The URL can be used to link to this page

11- Hazardous Material Mitigation DocumentationNovember 9, 2022 Mr. Jonathan K. Slater Project Manager Mass General Brigham Cooley Dickinson Hospital 30 Locust St Northampton, MA01060 Re: CDH Project #738482 Limited Asbestos Survey Cooley Dickinson Hospital Emergency and Endoscopy Departments 30 Locust St Northampton, MA 01060 Dear Mr. Slater: Pursuant to your request, Green Environmental Consulting, Inc (GEC) performed a limited asbestos survey at the above-referenced location. It is our understanding that areas located on the ground floor of the building, including the emergency (ED) and endoscopy department (ENDO), may undergo renovations. The extent of potential renovations were not finalized at the time of our survey or report preparation. The purpose of GEC’s survey was to assist Mass General Brigham with budgetary planning for scheduled building renovations by: •Supplementing previous asbestos surveys and sampling in the building; and •Providing general information on the types of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) present in the building. This report incorporates information from previous asbestos surveys by GEC in 2014 and 2016. The hospital was in full operation at the time of the survey. Our survey was limited to accessible areas of the building. Very limited exploratory demolition of flooring was performed. Access to occupied treatment rooms, wall cavities, to ceiling cavities, and below multi-layer flooring was also limited. Fieldwork associated with the project was performed on September 27-30, 2022, by Massachusetts- licensed Asbestos Inspector, David Abad (License #AI071927). Page of 31 Green Environmental Consulting, Inc 180 Pleasant Street, Suite 213 Easthampton, MA 01027 tel/fax 413-341-3418 www.GecEnviro.com Table No. 1, Non-Asbestos Materials Limited Asbestos Survey Cooley Dickinson Hospital’s Emergency and Endoscopy Departments Background GEC understands that the current scope of renovations includes the ED and ENDO. Both areas are located on the ground floor of the building. ENDO is located in entirely in the Outpatient Department (OPD) building. The ED is located in the OPD building, West-Wing and P-2000 areas. Ground Floor - Outpatient Department Building The OPD building was constructed in 1973. Interior finish materials include: suspended ceilings; original wall plaster with replacement sheetrock/joint compound wall systems; and replacement vinyl floor tiles over original asbestos-containing linoleum sheet flooring. Fiberglass pipe insulation with cementitious fittings are located above suspended ceilings and in wall cavities. A comprehensive asbestos survey of the 1st floor of the OPD building was performed by GEC in 2014. Laboratory reports and chains-of- custody for samples collected during GEC’s 2014 survey of the 1st floor of the OPD building are included in Attachment 4. Ground Floor - West Wing The West Wing was constructed in 1963. Interior finish materials include: suspended ceilings; original wall plaster with replacement sheetrock/joint compound wall systems; and vinyl floor tiles. Pipe insulation includes fiberglass with cementitious fittings and solid magnesia-type insulation on steam lines located above suspended ceilings and in wall cavities. A comprehensive asbestos survey of the ground floor of the west wing was performed by GEC in 2016. Laboratory reports and chains-of-custody for samples collected during GEC’s 2016 survey of the ground floor of the west wing are included in Attachment 5. P-2000 Area The P-2000 area was constructed in 1998. Interior finish materials include: suspended ceilings; sheetrock/ joint compound wall systems; and vinyl floor tiles. For the purpose of this limited survey asbestos sampling of materials in the P2000 area was not performed as asbestos-containing materials were not likely used in construction. Prior to renovations a comprehensive pre-demolition asbestos survey is required. Asbestos Sampling and Results A total of 50 samples of suspect ACMs were collected and submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (EPA 600/R-93/116). Materials determined to contain one percent or greater asbestos are considered to be ACMs. The results of the GEC’s asbestos sampling, as well as a review of previous asbestos sampling events performed in the the hospital, indicate that the following materials contain asbestos: 1.Ground Floor - Outpatient Department Building: •Gray/Tan pebble design linoleum throughout the ground floor and mostly below other types of flooring; •Damproofing in wall cavities on interior side of exterior brick walls; •Pipe fitting insulation (on fiberglass insulated pipes); and 1 •Brown duct sealant on metal ducts above suspended ceilings. Both asbestos and non-asbestos pipe fittings were identified on fiberglass insulated lines. Since both 1 materials are present in the same area and access for inspection is limited, GEC recommends that these materials be conservatively handled and disposed of as ACM. Page of 42 Limited Asbestos Survey Cooley Dickinson Hospital’s Emergency and Endoscopy Departments 2.Ground-Floor West Wing •Solid thermal magnesia type pipe insulation located on steam lines in wall and ceiling cavities; •Pipe fitting insulation1 (on fiberglass insulated pipes); and •9” floor tile in stairway. Refer to Attachment 1 for a summary of asbestos-containing materials, including estimated quantities. It is important to note that these quantities are estimations only. Actual quantities may vary and may only become evident during renovation or demolition activities. Should suspect materials be encountered during such events, activities should cease to allow proper sampling and laboratory analysis of the suspect material(s). ACM should be properly abated by EPA accredited and Massachusetts licensed asbestos abatement contractor. Refer to Attachment 2 for a summary of laboratory analytical results. Refer to Attachment 3 for the laboratory reports and chains-of-custody for samples collected during our limited survey of ground floor ED and ENDO renovation areas. Limitations This report is intended for the sole use of Cooley Dickinson Hospital (Mass General Brigham). This report is not intended to serve as a bidding document nor as a project specification. Actual site conditions and quantities should be field-verified. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users. The use or re-use of this document, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations herein is at the risk of said user. GEC’s sampling was limited to scheduled renovation areas as identified on project drawings supplied by PureSource, LLC. GEC was unable to access wall cavities, ceiling cavities, or below all floorings. Treatment rooms occupied by patients in ED and ENDO were inaccessible. The MassDEP and the US EPA currently recognize Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis as an acceptable analytical method for determining the asbestos content in non-friable, organically bound (NOB) materials. However, comparative studies between PLM analysis and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis have shown that PLM analysis may yield false negative analytical results for NOBs. GEC recommends that, prior to renovation activities, one sample from each homogeneous area of NOB materials that originally tested negative by PLM undergo confirmatory analysis by TEM, utilizing ELAP-198.4 TEM Method for Identifying and Quantifying Asbestos in NOB Bulk Samples. The sampling performed was limited in nature and does not a constitute a comprehensive inspection of the entire building. GEC recommends that additional inspections and sampling be performed, in accordance with the EPA’s NESHAP regulation prior to any renovation/demolition activities in the buildings that may disturb suspect ACMs not included in this report. Conclusions and Recommendations ACMs were identified in scheduled renovation areas during GEC’s sampling event and by previous surveys. Identified ACMs should be removed, handled, and disposed of properly, in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. GEC recommends that additional asbestos inspections and sampling be performed prior to renovations in accordance with the EPA’s NESHAP regulation in the following areas: •Wall and ceiling cavities in ground floor OPD Page of 43 Limited Asbestos Survey Cooley Dickinson Hospital’s Emergency and Endoscopy Departments •P2000 Area Any suspect ACM that is discovered during building renovation or demolition that is not included in this report should be assumed to contain asbestos until further bulk sampling and analysis is performed. GEC appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this important project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us at (413) 341-3418. Sincerely, Green Environmental Consulting, Inc. Asbestos Consulting Services Provider License #AF000242 Adam Lesko President 1 Asbestos-Containing Materials: Estimated Quantities Summary 2 Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Results 3 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2022 survey of ED and ENDO) 4 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2014 survey of 1st Floor OPD) 5 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2016 survey of Ground Floor West Wing) Page of 44 Attachment 1 Asbestos-Containing Materials: Estimated Quantities Summary Material Location Estimated Quantity Gray/tan pebbled linoleum Ground floor, OPD building (below various other types of flooring at many locations)17,000 Square Feet Interior damp proofing Ground floor, OPD Building exterior walls (assumed to present at junction to P200 Area)4,000 Square Feet Pipe fitting insulation (on fiberglass insulated lines, including roof drains)Ground floor, OPD Building 152 Each Pipe fitting insulation (on fiberglass insulated lines)Ground floor, west wing 18 Each Pipe Insulation - solid thermal magnesia type (on steam lines in walls and ceiling cavities) Ground floor, west wing 20 Linear Feet Brown duct sealant Ground floor, OPD Building (above suspended ceilings and in wall chases on metal ducts)100 Square Feet Transite Pipe Chase West wing stairway (ground floor landing)20 Square Feet 9” Brown Floor Tile West wing stairway (ground floor landing)100 Square Feet Notes: OPD=Outpatient Department Attachment 1 - Asbestos-containing Materials: Estimated Quantities Summary 1 Attachment 2 Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Results Material Location Sample Number(s)Asbestos Content Gray/tan pebbled linoleum OPD building: ED Nurse Practitioner Specialist Office 03691-01A None Detected Gray/tan pebbled linoleum OPD building: ED Ambulance Entrance 03691-01B 10% Chrysotile Gray/tan pebbled linoleum OPD building: ED Entrance - North Corridor By Electric Closet 03691-01C 10% Chrysotile Gray/tan pebbled linoleum mastic OPD building: ED Nurse Practitioner Specialist Office 03691-02A None Detected Gray/tan pebbled linoleum mastic OPD building: ED Ambulance Entrance 03691-02B None Detected Gray/tan pebbled linoleum mastic OPD building: ED Entrance - North Corridor By Electric Closet 03691-02C None Detected 4” Tan cove base OPD building: ED Nurse Practitioner Specialist Office 03691-03A None Detected 4” Tan cove base OPD building: ED Ambulance Entrance 03691-03B None Detected 4” Tan cove base mastic OPD building: ED Nurse Practitioner Specialist Office 03691-04A None Detected 4” Tan cove base mastic OPD building: ED Ambulance Entrance 03691-04B None Detected 12” Tan with black spots floor tile OPD building: ED northern storage closet 03691-05A None Detected 12” Tan with black spots floor tile mastic OPD building: ED northern storage closet 03691-06A None Detected 12” Dark tan mottled floor tile OPD building: ED northern storage closet 03691-07A None Detected 12” Dark tan mottled floor tile mastic OPD building: ED northern storage closet 03691-08A None Detected 12” Tan with specks floor tile OPD building: ED entrance: Northern hall by electric closet 03691-09A None Detected 12” Tan with specks floor tile mastic OPD building: ED entrance: Northern hall by electric closet 03691-10A None Detected 9” Black and white mottled floor tile West wing ground floor: Old OR #2 03691-11A None Detected 9” Black and white mottled floor tile mastic West wing ground floor: Old OR #2 03691-12A None Detected 12” Dark tan mottled floor tile OPD building: ENDO Nurses’ Station 03691-13A None Detected 12” Dark tan mottled floor tile mastic OPD building: ENDO Nurses’ Station 03691-14A None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ED Stretcher G location 03691-15A None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ED ambulance entrance 03691-15B None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ED hall by Room 22 03691-15C None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ED Administration Medical Director 03691-15D None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ENDO Administration Recovery Lounge 2 and 3 03691-15E None Detected Plaster skim coat OPD building: ENDO hall to Endoscopy 03691-15F None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ED Stretcher G location 03691-16A None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ED ambulance entrance 03691-16B None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ED hall by Room 22 03691-16C None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ED Administration Medical Director 03691-16D None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ENDO Administration Recovery Lounge 2 and 3 03691-16E None Detected Plaster base coat OPD building: ENDO hall to Endoscopy 03691-16F None Detected Sheetrock OPD building: ED hall outside Room 18 03691-17A None Detected Sheetrock OPD building: ED administration area 03691-17B None Detected Sheetrock OPD building: ENDO hall adjacent to communication closet 03691-17C None Detected Joint compound OPD building: ED hall outside Room 18 03691-18A None Detected Joint compound OPD building: ED administration area 03691-18B None Detected Attachment 2 - Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Results 1 Joint compound OPD building: ENDO hall adjacent to communication closet 03691-18C None Detected Interior damp proofing OPD building: ED Administration Medical Director 03691-19A 4% Chrysotile Interior damp proofing OPD building: ENDO Administration Recovery Lounge 2 and 3 03691-19B 5% Chrysotile OPD water heater tank insulation OPD building: sub-basement 03691-20A None Detected Pipe fitting - hot water main OPD building: sub-basement 03691-21A None Detected Pipe fitting - steam supply OPD building: sub-basement 03691-22A None Detected Pipe fitting - condensate return OPD building: sub-basement 03691-23A None Detected Pipe fitting - cold supply OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-above paint shop 03691-24A 2% Chrysotile Pipe fitting - hot supply OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-above paint shop 03691-25A 2% Chrysotile Rain leader - pipe fitting OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-above paint shop 03691-26A 2% Chrysotile Pipe fitting - hot water line OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-by welding bench 03691-27A None Detected Pipe fitting - cold water line OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-by welding bench 03691-28A 2% Chrysotile Rain leader pipe fitting OPD building: Basement OPD facility shop-by table saw 03691-29A None Detected Notes: OPD=Outpatient Department ED=Emergency Department ENDO=Endoscopy Material Location Sample Number(s)Asbestos Content Attachment 2 - Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Results 2 Attachment 3 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2022 ED and ENDO Renovations) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 042224311EMSL Order: Customer ID:GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Attention:Phone:David Abad (413) 341-3418 Fax:Green Environmental Consulting, Inc.(413) 341-3419 Received Date:180 Pleasant St 09/28/2022 9:30 AM Analysis Date:2nd Floor, Suite 213 10/04/2022 Collected Date:Easthampton, MA 01027 09/27/2022 Project:03691-Cooley Dickinson Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 03691-01A 042224311-0001 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)70%Cellulose Glass 25% 5% Gray/Tan Fibrous Homogeneous ED Nurse Practioner Specialist Office - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum HA: 1 03691-01B 042224311-0002 10%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)70%Cellulose20%Gray/Tan Fibrous Homogeneous ED Ambulance Entrance - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum HA: 1 03691-01C 042224311-0003 10%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)70%Cellulose20%Gray/Tan Fibrous Homogeneous ED Entrance - North Corridor By Electric Closet - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum HA: 1 03691-02A 042224311-0004 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Ed Nurse Practioner Specialist Office - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum Mastic HA: 2 03691-02B 042224311-0005 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Ambulance Entrance - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum Mastic HA: 2 03691-02C 042224311-0006 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Entrance - North Hall By Electric Closet - Gray/Tan Pebbled Linoleum Mastic HA: 2 03691-03A 042224311-0007 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Nurse Practioner Specialist Office - 4" Tan Cove Base HA: 3 03691-03B 042224311-0008 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Ambulance Entrance - 4" Tan Cove Base HA: 3 03691-04A 042224311-0009 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Nurse Practioner Specialist Office - 4" Tan Cove Base Mastic HA: 4 03691-04B 042224311-0010 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Ambulance Entrance - 4" Tan Cove Base Mastic HA: 4 03691-05A 042224311-0011 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED North Storage Closet - 12" Tan W/ Black Spots Floor Tile HA: 5 Initial report from: 10/05/2022 00:40:54 Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/5/2022 12:40 AM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 042224311EMSL Order: Customer ID:GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 03691-06A 042224311-0012 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED North Storage Closet - 12" Tan W/ Black Spots Floor Tile Mastic HA: 6 03691-07A 042224311-0013 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED North Storage Closet - 12" Dark Tan Mottled Floor Tile HA: 7 03691-08A 042224311-0014 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED North Storage Closet - 12" Dark Tan Mottled Floor Tile Mastic HA: 8 03691-09A 042224311-0015 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Entrance - North Hall By Electric Closet - 12" Tan W/ Speck Floor Tile HA: 9 03691-10A 042224311-0016 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Entrance - North Hall By Electric Closet - 12" Tan W/ Speck Floor Tile Mastic HA: 10 03691-11A 042224311-0017 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous West Wing - Old D.R. #2 - 9" Black & White Mottle Floor Tile HA: 11 03691-12A 042224311-0018 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous West Wing - Old D.R. #2 - 9" Black & White Mottle Floor Tile Mastic HA: 12 03691-13A 042224311-0019 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Endo - Nurses Station - 12" Dark Tan Mottled Floor Tile HA: 13 03691-14A 042224311-0020 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Yellow Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous Endo - Nurses Station - 12" Dark Tan Mottled Floor Tile Mastic HA: 14 Analyst(s) John Witcraft (16) Nancy Stalter (4) Samantha Rundstrom, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . The report reflects the samples as received. Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 “Interim Method”) but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 (”final”) version of the method. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis . Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367, LA #04127 Initial report from: 10/05/2022 00:40:54 Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/5/2022 12:40 AM OrderID: 042224311 Page 1 Of 2 OrderID: 042224311 Page 2 Of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 042224672EMSL Order: Customer ID:GECL78 Customer PO:03691 Project ID: Attention:Phone:EMSL Reports (413) 341-3418 Fax:Green Environmental Consulting, Inc.(413) 341-3419 Received Date:180 Pleasant St 10/03/2022 9:10 AM Analysis Date:2nd Floor, Suite 213 10/09/2022 - 10/10/2022 Collected Date:Easthampton, MA 01027 09/30/2022 Project:Cooley Dickinson Hospital ED/Endo Depts / 30 Locust Street / Northampton, MA 01060 / Project #03691 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 03691-15A 042224672-0001 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Stretcher Location G - Pipe Fitting - Hot Water Main HA: 15 03691-15B 042224672-0002 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Ambulance Entrance - Plaster Skim Coat HA: 15 03691-15C 042224672-0003 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Hall Outside Room 22 - Plaster Skim Coat HA: 15 03691-15D 042224672-0004 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Administration Medical Director Office - Plaster Skim Coat HA: 15 03691-15E 042224672-0005 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Administration Recovery Lounge 2 & 3 - Plaster Skim Coat HA: 15 03691-15F 042224672-0006 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Hall to Endoscopy - Plaster Skim Coat HA: 15 03691-16A 042224672-0007 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Stretcher Location G - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 03691-16B 042224672-0008 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Ambulance Entrance - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 03691-16C 042224672-0009 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Hall Outside Room 22 - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 03691-16D 042224672-0010 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Administration Medical Director Office - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 03691-16E 042224672-0011 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Administration Recovery Lounge 2 & 3 - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 Initial report from: 10/10/2022 10:47:53 Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/10/2022 10:47 AM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 042224672EMSL Order: Customer ID:GECL78 Customer PO:03691 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 03691-16F 042224672-0012 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Hall to Endoscopy - Plaster Base Coat HA: 16 03691-17A 042224672-0013 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Glass 15% 5% Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Hall Outside Room 18 - Sheetrock HA: 17 03691-17B 042224672-0014 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Glass 15% 5% Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Administration Area - Sheetrock HA: 17 03691-17C 042224672-0015 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Glass 15% 5% Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Hall Adjacent to Communication Closet - Sheetrock HA: 17 03691-18A 042224672-0016 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Hall Outside Room 18 - Joint Compound HA: 18 03691-18B 042224672-0017 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED Administration Area - Joint Compound HA: 18 03691-18C 042224672-0018 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Hall Adjacent to Communication Closet - Joint Compound HA: 18 03691-19A 042224672-0019 4%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)96%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ED - Adminstration Medical Director Office - Interior Damp Proofing - Perimeter Wall HA: 19 03691-19B 042224672-0020 5%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)95%Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous ENDO - Administration Recoverty Lounge 2 & 3 - Interior Damp Proofing - Perimeter Wall HA: 19 03691-20A 042224672-0021 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose Fibrous (Other) 15% 5% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Sub Basement - OPD - OPD Water Heater Tank Insulaiton HA: 20 03691-21A 042224672-0022 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 2% 78% Cellulose Fibrous (Other) 15% 5% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Sub Basement - OPD - Pipe Fitting - Hot Water Main HA: 21 03691-22A 042224672-0023 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 30% 65% Fibrous (Other)5%Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Sub Basement - OPD - Pipe Fitting - Steam Supply HA: 22 03691-23A 042224672-0024 None DetectedVermiculite Non-fibrous (Other) 3% 77% Cellulose Fibrous (Other) 15% 5% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Sub Basement - OPD - Pipe Fitting - Condensate Return HA: 23 Initial report from: 10/10/2022 10:47:53 Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/10/2022 10:47 AM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com 042224672EMSL Order: Customer ID:GECL78 Customer PO:03691 Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 03691-24A 042224672-0025 2%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - Above Paint Shop - Pipe Fitting - Cold Supply HA: 24 03691-25A 042224672-0026 2%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)88%Cellulose Min. Wool 5% 5% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - Above Paint Shop - Pipe Fitting - Hot Supply HA: 25 03691-26A 042224672-0027 2%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)88%Cellulose Min. Wool 5% 5% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - Above Paint Shop - Pipe Fitting - Pipe Fitting HA: 26 03691-27A 042224672-0028 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - By Welding Bench - Pipe Fitting - Hot Water Line HA: 27 03691-28A 042224672-0029 2%ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)73%Cellulose Min. Wool 5% 20% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - By Welding Bench - Pipe Fitting - Cold Water Line HA: 28 03691-29A 042224672-0030 None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)65%Cellulose Min. Wool 5% 30% Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous Basement - OPD Facility Shop - By Table Saw - Rain Leader Pipe Fitting HA: 29 Analyst(s) Andrea Doughty (7) Christopher Ratcliffe (23) Samantha Rundstrom, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . The report reflects the samples as received. Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 “Interim Method”) but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 (”final”) version of the method. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis . Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367, LA #04127 Initial report from: 10/10/2022 10:47:53 Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/10/2022 10:47 AM OrderID: 042224672 Page 1 Of 3 OrderID: 042224672 Page 2 Of 3 OrderID: 042224672 Page 3 Of 3 Attachment 4 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2014 survey of 1st Floor OPD) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131401754 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: Attn:Adam Lesko Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 3rd Floor, Suite 7 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:05/12/14 8:30 AM 00912 / CDH-West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 5/16/2014Analysis Date: Collected: Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy 00912-05D 131401754-0001 REHAB WAITING AREA - GREY FIRESTOP Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-05E 131401754-0002 TREATMENT ROOM 7 - GREY FIRESTOP Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose2%Non-fibrous (other)98% 00912-05F 131401754-0003 MAIN REHAB HALL - GREY FIRESTOP Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-32A 131401754-0004 BACK STAIRS - 12" BLUE FLOOR TILE Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-32B 131401754-0005 BACK STAIRS - 12" BLUE FLOOR TILE Gray None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-33A 131401754-0006 BACK STAIRS - 12" BLUE FLOOR TILE MASTIC Yellow None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-33B 131401754-0007 BACK STAIRS - 12" BLUE FLOOR TILE MASTIC Yellow None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-34A 131401754-0008 BACK STAIRS - LINOLEUM L2 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile15%Cellulose5%Non-fibrous (other)80% 1Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 5/16/2014 2:15:38 PM Steve Grise, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Analyst(s) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3 and VT AL357102 Initial report from 05/16/2014 14:15:38 Fievel Lam (19) Sean Ryan (17) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131401754 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: Attn:Adam Lesko Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 3rd Floor, Suite 7 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:05/12/14 8:30 AM 00912 / CDH-West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 5/16/2014Analysis Date: Collected: Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy 00912-34B 131401754-0009 BACK STAIRS - LINOLEUM L2 Tan Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile20%Cellulose5%Non-fibrous (other)75% 00912-35A 131401754-0010 BACK STAIRS - LINOLEUM L2 MASTIC Yellow None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-35B 131401754-0011 BACK STAIRS - LINOLEUM L2 MASTIC Yellow None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-36A 131401754-0012 SMALL REHAB HALL - 2X2 CEILING TILE Gray None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose40% Min. Wool40% Non-fibrous (other)20% 00912-36B 131401754-0013 MAIN REHAB HALL - 2X2 CEILING TILE Tan None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose40% Min. Wool40% Non-fibrous (other)20% 00912-37A 131401754-0014 VENT ABOVE CEILING - VENT SEALANT Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile18%Non-fibrous (other)82% 00912-37B 131401754-0015 VENT ABOVE CEILING - VENT SEALANT Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile18%Non-fibrous (other)82% 00912-38A 131401754-0016 MAIN REHAB HALL - COVE BASE/ SIDE RUG ADHESIVE Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose3%Non-fibrous (other)97% 2Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 5/16/2014 2:15:38 PM Steve Grise, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Analyst(s) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3 and VT AL357102 Initial report from 05/16/2014 14:15:38 Fievel Lam (19) Sean Ryan (17) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131401754 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: Attn:Adam Lesko Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 3rd Floor, Suite 7 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:05/12/14 8:30 AM 00912 / CDH-West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 5/16/2014Analysis Date: Collected: Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy 00912-38B 131401754-0017 LARGE REHAB ROOM OFFICE - COVE BASE/ SIDE RUG ADHESIVE Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose3%Non-fibrous (other)97% 00912-39A 131401754-0018 LARGE REHAB ROOM OFFICE - COVE BASE/ADHESIVE TAN White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-39B 131401754-0019 LARGE REHAB ROOM - COVE BASE/ADHESIVE TAN White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-40A 131401754-0020 TREATMENT ROOM 5 - RUG ADHESIVE GREEN Green None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Synthetic5%Non-fibrous (other)95% 00912-40B 131401754-0021 TREATMENT ROOM 1 - RUG ADHESIVE GREEN Green None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Synthetic5%Non-fibrous (other)95% 00912-41A 131401754-0022 LARGE REHAB ROOM OFFICE - WALL TILE GROUT White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-41B 131401754-0023 LARGE REHAB ROOM OFFICE - WALL TILE GROUT White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 3Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 5/16/2014 2:15:38 PM Steve Grise, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Analyst(s) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3 and VT AL357102 Initial report from 05/16/2014 14:15:38 Fievel Lam (19) Sean Ryan (17) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131401754 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: Attn:Adam Lesko Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 3rd Floor, Suite 7 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:05/12/14 8:30 AM 00912 / CDH-West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 5/16/2014Analysis Date: Collected: Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy 00912-42A 131401754-0024 REHAB WAITING AREA - SKIM COAT OVER FIRESTOP White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-42B 131401754-0025 TREATMENT ROOM 7 - SKIM COAT OVER FIRESTOP White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-42C 131401754-0026 MAIN REHAB HALL - SKIM COAT OVER FIRESTOP White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-43A 131401754-0027 MID HALL BY ELEVATORS - LINOLEUM SMALL GREY BLOCK Gray Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile25%Cellulose5%Non-fibrous (other)70% 00912-43B 131401754-0028 MID HALL BY ELEVATORS - LINOLEUM SMALL GREY BLOCK Gray Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile25%Cellulose5%Non-fibrous (other)70% 00912-44A 131401754-0029 MID HALL BY ELEVATORS - LINOLEUM SMALL GREY BLOCK MASTIC Brown None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 4Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 5/16/2014 2:15:38 PM Steve Grise, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Analyst(s) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3 and VT AL357102 Initial report from 05/16/2014 14:15:38 Fievel Lam (19) Sean Ryan (17) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131401754 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: Attn:Adam Lesko Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 3rd Floor, Suite 7 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:05/12/14 8:30 AM 00912 / CDH-West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 5/16/2014Analysis Date: Collected: Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy 00912-44B 131401754-0030 MID HALL BY ELEVATORS - LINOLEUM SMALL GREY BLOCK MASTIC Brown Possible contamination Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Chrysotile<1%Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-45A 131401754-0031 SMALL REHAB HALL - SHEETROCK Gray None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Glass5% Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)93% 00912-45B 131401754-0032 TREATMENT ROOM 7 - SHEETROCK Brown/White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose20% Glass2% Non-fibrous (other)78% 00912-46A 131401754-0033 TREATMENT ROOM 7 - JOINT COMPOUND White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-46B 131401754-0034 TREATMENT ROOM 4 - JOINT COMPOUND White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 00912-46C 131401754-0035 LARGE REHAB ROOM OFFICE - JOINT COMPOUND White None Detected Fibrous Homogeneous Cellulose20%Non-fibrous (other)80% 00912-46D 131401754-0036 SMALL REHAB HALL - JOINT COMPOUND White None Detected Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Non-fibrous (other)100% 5THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 5/16/2014 2:15:38 PM Steve Grise, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Analyst(s) EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3 and VT AL357102 Initial report from 05/16/2014 14:15:38 Fievel Lam (19) Sean Ryan (17) Attachment 5 Laboratory Reports and Chains-of-Custody (2016 survey of Ground Floor West Wing) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Attention:Phone:Mary McCarthy (413) 341-3418 Fax:Green Environmental Consulting, LLC (413) 341-3419 Received Date:180 Pleasant St 1/ 7/2016 9:23 AM Analysis Date:2nd Floor, Suite 213 1/ 7/2016 Collected Date:Easthampton, MA 01027 1/ 6/2016 Project:01527 / CDH-Ground Floor West Wing Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-01A 131600058-0001 White/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 3 - 9" Black and White Speckled Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-01B 131600058-0002 White/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - 9" Black and White Speckled Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-02A 131600058-0003 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 3 - 9" Floor Tile Mastic 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-02B 131600058-0003A Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 3 - 9" Floor Tile Mastic 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-03A 131600058-0004 Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - 6" Brown Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-03B 131600058-0005 Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - 6" Brown Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-04A 131600058-0006 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-04B 131600058-0007 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-05A 131600058-0008 Tan Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - 2'x2' Ceiling Tile 35% 35% Cellulose Min. Wool 30%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-05B 131600058-0009 Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Anesthesia Support - 2'x2' Ceiling Tile 40% 40% Cellulose Min. Wool 20%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-06A 131600058-0010 Brown/White Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Transportation & Mail Services - Sheetrock 10%Cellulose 90%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-06B 131600058-0011 Tan/White Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Sheetrock 10%Cellulose 90%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-07A 131600058-0012 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Transportation & Mail Services - Joint Compound 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-07B 131600058-0013 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Joint Compound 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-07C 131600058-0014 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedWomen's Locker by Lounge - Joint Compound 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 1 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-08A 131600058-0015 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedDirty Laundry - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08B 131600058-0016 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 2 - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08C 131600058-0017 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor North - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08D 131600058-0018 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08E 131600058-0019 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedAnesthesia Storage - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08F 131600058-0020 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room by Path Cutting Room - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-08G 131600058-0021 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room by Clinical Support Options - Plaster Skim Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09A 131600058-0022 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedDirty Laundry - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09B 131600058-0023 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 2 - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09C 131600058-0024 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor North - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09D 131600058-0025 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09E 131600058-0026 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedAnesthesia Storage - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09F 131600058-0027 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room by Path Cutting Room - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-09G 131600058-0028 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room by Clinical Support Options - Plaster Base Coat 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-10A 131600058-0029 Red Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor by OP2 - Brown/Red Firestop 3%Synthetic 97%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-10B 131600058-0030 Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedNurse's Station - Brown/Red Firestop 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-11 131600058-0031 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClinical Support Options - 12" Black Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-12 131600058-0032 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClinical Support Options - 12" Floor Tile Mastic 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-13A 131600058-0033 Clear Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - Panelboard Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 2 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-13B 131600058-0034 Clear Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClinical Support Options - Panelboard Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-14A 131600058-0035 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Break Room 2 - Ceramic Tile Mortar (Gray) 98%Non-fibrous (Other)2%Chrysotile The sample group is not homogeneous, Sample appears to be adhesive. 01527-14B 131600058-0036 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 3 - Ceramic Tile Mortar (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-15A 131600058-0037 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Break Room 2 - Black Sink Coat 88%Non-fibrous (Other)12%Chrysotile 01527-15B 131600058-0038 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Break Room 1 - Black Sink Coat 90%Non-fibrous (Other)10%Chrysotile 01527-16A 131600058-0039 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedDirty Laundry - White Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-16B 131600058-0040 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - White Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-17A 131600058-0041 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedDirty Laundry - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-17B 131600058-0042 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-18A 131600058-0043 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Gray Pebble Design Linoleum 10%Cellulose 90%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-18B 131600058-0044 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Gray Pebble Design Linoleum 15% 5% Cellulose Synthetic 80%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-19A 131600058-0045 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Linoleum Adhesive 30%Cellulose 70%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-19B 131600058-0046 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Linoleum Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-20A 131600058-0047 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedConference Room - Gray Duct Seam Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-20B 131600058-0048 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - Gray Duct Seam Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-21A 131600058-0049 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 1 - Yellow/Green Duct Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-21B 131600058-0050 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - Yellow/Green Duct Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-21C 131600058-0051 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 2 - Yellow/Green Duct Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-23A 131600058-0052 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - 12" Gray Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 3 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-23B 131600058-0053 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - 12" Gray Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-24A 131600058-0054 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Floor Tile Mastic (Yellow) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-24B 131600058-0055 Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedClean Room - Floor Tile Mastic (Yellow) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-25A 131600058-0056 Gray/White Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - 2'x2' Square Design Ceiling Tile 65% 10% Cellulose Min. Wool 25%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-25B 131600058-0057 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedMen's Locker Room by Lounge - 2'x2' Ceiling Tile 50% 30% Cellulose Min. Wool 20%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-26A 131600058-0058 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - Gray Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-26B 131600058-0059 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedWomen's Locker by Lounge - Gray Cove Base 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-27A 131600058-0060 Beige Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-27B 131600058-0061 Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedWomen's Locker by Lounge - Cove Base Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-28A 131600058-0062 White/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLinen's - 12" White w/Black Specks Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-28B 131600058-0063 White/Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - 12" White w/Black Specks Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-29A 131600058-0064 Orange Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLinen's - 12" Floor Tile Adhesive (Orange) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-29B 131600058-0065 Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLounge - 12" Floor Tile Adhesive (Orange) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-30 131600058-0066 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLinen's - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling Tile 60% 20% Cellulose Min. Wool 20%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-31A 131600058-0067 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Office by Anesthesia Storage - Black Interior Window Glaze 97%Non-fibrous (Other)3%Chrysotile 01527-31B 131600058-0068 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedNurse's Station - Black Interior Window Glaze 5%Cellulose 95%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-32 131600058-0069 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedAnesthesia Storage - White Sink Coat 20%Cellulose 80%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-33A 131600058-0070 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Light Green Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-33B 131600058-0071 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Light Green Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 4 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-34A 131600058-0072 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Dark Green Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-34B 131600058-0073 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Dark Green Floor Tile 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-35A 131600058-0074 Brown Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Floor Tile Mastic (Brown) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-35B 131600058-0075 White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho - 12" Floor Tile Mastic (Brown) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-36A 131600058-0076 Tan Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - Tan Pebble Design Linoleum 30%Cellulose 70%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-36B 131600058-0077 Gray Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - Tan Pebble Design Linoleum 20%Cellulose 80%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-37A 131600058-0078 Black/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - Linoleum Adhesive 3%Cellulose 97%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-37B 131600058-0079 Black/Yellow Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedCorridor Outside Clinic Support Options - Linoleum Adhesive 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-38A 131600058-0080 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Path Cutting Room - 9" Light Green Floor Tile 97%Non-fibrous (Other)3%Chrysotile 01527-38B 131600058-0081 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Path Cutting Room - 9" Light Green Floor Tile 98%Non-fibrous (Other)2%Chrysotile 01527-39A 131600058-0082 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedPath Cutting Room - 9" Floor Tile Mastic (Black) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-39B 131600058-0083 Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room by Path Cutting Room - 9" Floor Tile Mastic (Black) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-40A 131600058-0084 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Locker Room by Path Cutting Room - 9" Dark Green Floor Tile 97%Non-fibrous (Other)3%Chrysotile 01527-40B 131600058-0085 Green Non-Fibrous Homogeneous Locker Room by Path Cutting Room - 9" Dark Green Floor Tile 98%Non-fibrous (Other)2%Chrysotile 01527-41A 131600058-0086 Black Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedPath Cutting Room - Black Flooring Paper 70%Cellulose 30%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-41B 131600058-0087 Black Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedPath Cutting Room - Black Flooring Paper 70%Cellulose 30%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-42A 131600058-0088 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room Bath by Path Cutting Room - Ceramic Floor Tile Grout 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 5 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-42B 131600058-0089 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedLocker Room Bath by Path Cutting Room - Ceramic Floor Tile Grout 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Analyst(s) Alexander Maxinoski (1) Kevin Pine (45) Michael Mink (44) Alexander Maxinoski, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3, VT AL998919, Maine Bulk Asbestos BA039 Initial report from: 01/09/2016 14:07:02 Page 6 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33 PM SAMPLE ID DESCRIPTION APPEARANCE % MATRIX MATERIAL % NON-ASBESTOS FIBERS ASBESTOS TYPES Attn:Mary McCarthy Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 2nd Floor, Suite 213 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:01/07/16 9:23 AM 01527 / CDH-Ground Floor West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 1/21/2016Analysis Date: 1/6/2016Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131600058 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: No Asbestos Detected01527-01A 131600058-0001 White/Black 100O.R. 3 - 9" Black and White Speckled Floor Tile Fibrous Heterogeneous None No Asbestos Detected01527-02A 131600058-0003 White/Black 100O.R. 3 - 9" Floor Tile Mastic Fibrous Heterogeneous None Alexander Maxinoski, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test Report EPANOB-7.24.0 Printed: 1/21/2016 12:33:32 PM 1 Analyst(s) THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA Alexander Maxinoski (2) Initial report from 01/09/2016 14:07:02 OrderID: 131600058 Page 1 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 2 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 3 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 4 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 5 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 6 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 7 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 8 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 9 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 10 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 11 Of 12 OrderID: 131600058 Page 12 Of 12 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107 Woburn, MA 01801 Tel/Fax: (781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com / bostonlab@emsl.com 131601447EMSL Order: Customer ID: GECL78 Customer PO: Project ID: Attention:Phone:Mary McCarthy (413) 341-3418 Fax:Green Environmental Consulting, LLC (413) 341-3419 Received Date:180 Pleasant St 03/28/2016 9:00 AM Analysis Date:2nd Floor, Suite 213 03/28/2016 Collected Date:Easthampton, MA 01027 03/24/2016 Project:01527 / CDH-Ground Floor West Wing Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous Non-Asbestos Asbestos % Type 01527-43A 131601447-0001 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 2-Sink Cabinet Base - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-43B 131601447-0002 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedBreak Room 2-Upper Wall - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-43C 131601447-0003 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 2-Upper Wall - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-43D 131601447-0004 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedO.R. 3-Upper Wall - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) 01527-43E 131601447-0005 Gray Non-Fibrous Homogeneous None DetectedOrtho-Upper Wall - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray) 100%Non-fibrous (Other) Analyst(s) Alexander Maxinoski (5)Alexander Maxinoski, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA NVLAP Lab Code 101147-0, CT PH-0315, MA AA000188, RI AAL-107T3, VT AL998919, Maine Bulk Asbestos BA039 Initial Report From: 03/28/2016 14:33:28 Page 1 of 1PLM - 1.67 Printed: 3/28/2016 2:33 PM SAMPLE ID DESCRIPTION APPEARANCE % MATRIX MATERIAL % NON-ASBESTOS FIBERS ASBESTOS TYPES Attn:Mary McCarthy Green Environmental Consulting, LLC 180 Pleasant St 2nd Floor, Suite 213 Easthampton, MA 01027 Received:03/28/16 9:00 AM 01527 / CDH-Ground Floor West Wing Fax:(413) 341-3419 Phone:(413) 341-3418 Project: 4/1/2016Analysis Date: 3/24/2016Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 7 Constitution Way, Suite 107, Woburn, MA 01801 Phone/Fax:(781) 933-8411 / (781) 933-8412 http://www.EMSL.com bostonlab@emsl.com 131601447 CustomerID:GECL78 CustomerPO: ProjectID: EMSL Order: No Asbestos Detected01527-43A 131601447-0001 Gray 100Break Room 2-Sink Cabinet Base - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray)Fibrous Heterogeneous None No Asbestos Detected01527-43E 131601447-0005 Gray 100Ortho-Upper Wall - Ceramic Tile Adhesive (Gray)Fibrous Heterogeneous None Alexander Maxinoski, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test Report EPANOB-7.24.0 Printed: 4/1/2016 8:16:16 AM 1 Analyst(s) THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Woburn, MA Alexander Maxinoski (2) Initial report from 04/01/2016 08:16:16 OrderID: 131601447 Page 1 Of 1 J1560-02-01 July 6, 2022 Mr. Jonathan Slater Cooley Dickinson Heath Care 30 Locust Street Northampton, Massachusetts 01060 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Slater: O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. (OTO) is pleased to provide this letter report summarizing our geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed addition to the Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton, Massachusetts. The addition is a portion of the larger expansion/buildout of the emergency department. A Site Locus is provided as Figure 1. A Site Plan is provided as Figure 2. Our geotechnical recommendations are based upon subsurface conditions observed in four soil borings. Our services consisted of the full-time observation of the borings, review of the logs and soil samples, engineering analyses, and preparation of this report. This report is subject to the attached limitations. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions The project Site is located within to the east of the existing emergency department at the Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton, Massachusetts. The location of the Site is shown on Figure 1. The portion of the existing hospital adjacent to the project Site consists of a one- to two-story, slab on grade, brick building. We understand that there are also basement-level mechanical rooms in some areas. The Site is bounded to the north by Locust Street, to the east by paved parking lots and North Elm Street, and to the south and west by the existing hospital building. Topography on the hospital campus generally slopes downward from the northwest to the southeast. The ground surface in the vicinity of the proposed addition is generally flat, near elevation 126 feet. Proposed Construction The emergency department expansion project consists of the buildout of existing space within the hospital building and the construction of an approximately 9,000 square foot (footprint) addition. This report specifically addresses geotechnical engineering Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 2 recommendations for the proposed addition. The approximate location of the proposed addition is shown on Figure 2. We understand that the addition will be a single-story, slab on grade structure with a brick façade to match the existing building. We expect that the floor slab will be even with the existing first floor building slab, near existing grade. Therefore, we expect up to two feet of fill will be placed to achieve final grades and excavations on the order of four feet to construct the addition. We expect structural loads to be supported on both isolated column and continuous strip footings. Structural loads are unknown at this time. However, it is expected that maximum column loads will be on the order of 100 kips and that bearing walls will carry a load of approximately five kips per linear foot, or less. These assumptions should be confirmed by the design team. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND TESTING Subsurface investigations consisted of four soil borings (CD-1 through CD-4). The borings were performed on June 8, 2022, by Seaboard Drilling of Chicopee, Massachusetts. Borings were performed using a Mobile B-53 truck mounted drill rig and hollow stem drilling techniques. Each boring was performed within the footprint of the proposed addition and extended to a depth of 11 to 37 feet below ground surface. Boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Boring logs are attached. Soil samples were generally collected continuously from one to seven feet below ground surface, at a depth of ten feet, and every five feet thereafter. Soil samples were collected using a two-inch diameter split spoon sampler, driven 24 inches with a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches (American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method D1586 “Standard Test Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils”). The number of blows required to drive the sampler each six inches was recorded. The standard penetration resistance, or N-value, is the number of blows required to drive the sampler the middle 12 inches. Soil properties, such as strength and density, are related to the N-value. The field N-values are corrected to a standard 60% hammer efficiency, known as N60, to account for differing hammer efficiencies for each hammer type and drill rig. The N-values presented on the boring logs are field values, which are not adjusted for hammer efficiency. However, the adjusted N60 values were used in our engineering calculations and analysis. The headspace of each soil sample collected from the borings was screened using a MiniRAE Lite photo-ionization detector (PID). PID screening provides an assessment of volatile organic content of the samples. PID readings are provided on the boring logs. One representative composite sample of the near-surface fill (collected from boring CD-3 from one to seven feet below ground surface) was analyzed for grain size distribution (sieve only) by Allied Testing Laboratories of Springfield, Massachusetts. These tests were performed to evaluate the suitability of on-Site soils for use as engineered fill. Results are discussed below. Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 3 An O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. (OTO) engineer observed and logged the borings. Samples were classified according to a modified version of the Burmister Soil Classification System. After drilling, bore holes were backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with asphalt. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were interpreted based upon the soil borings and generally consisted of the following, in order of increasing depth: a surface layer of asphalt with granular base; non-engineered fill; and native granular and fine-grained soils. Soil Conditions Asphalt Pavement: Each of the borings were performed in existing paved areas. The pavement consisted of between four and six inches of asphalt, underlain by five to eight inches of granular base course. The granular base course generally consisted of fine to medium sand with little to some gravel and varying amounts of silt. Fill: Between 3 and 8.5 feet of fill soil was encountered in borings CD-1, CD-3, and CD-4. The fill consisted of medium dense to dense, fine to medium sand with little to trace silt, trace debris (brick, asphalt, ash, coal), and varying amounts of gravel and coarse sand. Upper Granular Soils: Native granular soils were encountered at a depth of between 1.5 and 8.5 feet below ground surface. This relatively recent alluvial deposit generally consisted of loose to medium dense, fine to medium sand with little to trace silt and varying amounts of gravel and coarse sand. Boring CD-4 was terminated within this layer at a depth of 11 feet below ground surface (approximate elevation 214 feet). Varved Clay: An approximately one- to ten-foot thick layer of fine-grained soils was encountered in borings CD-1 through CD-3 at a depth of 20 to 25.5 feet below ground surface (elevation 200 to 206 feet). This layer was very soft to very stiff and consisted of interbedded seams of sandy silty and silty clay – collectively known as varved clay – that were deposited in glacial meltwater at the end of the Pleistocene (most recent ice-age). We do not anticipate that the varved clay layer will impact the proposed construction, based upon depth to this layer and the anticipated structural loads. Lower Granular Soils: Granular soils were again encountered at a depth of 25 to 35.5 feet below ground surface (elevation 190.5 to 201 feet). The lower granular soil layer consisted of medium dense to dense fine to medium sand with little to trace silt and varying amounts of coarse sand and gravel. Borings CD-1 through CD-3 were terminated within these glacial or early post-glacial soils at a depth of 27 to 32 feet (elevation 189 to 199 feet). Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was encountered in borings CD-1 through CD-3 at a depth of 19 to 19.5 feet below ground surface, corresponding to approximate elevation 206.5 feet. Therefore, groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction or during the service life of the building. Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 4 Results of Environmental Field Screening The headspace of each soil sample was screened using a photoionization detector (PID). PID screening provides an assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of the samples. The PID readings were generally below the instrument detection limits. The sample from boring CD-1 sample S-1, which was collected from a depth of one to three feet below ground surface had a PID reading of 0.2 parts per million. This PID reading is typical of normal background readings and is not indicative of elevated levels of VOCs. PID readings are presented on the boring logs. Results of Grain Size Distribution Analysis The soil sample was classified as a fine to medium sand with trace amounts of fine gravel, coarse sand, and silt. The soil sample met characteristics of a Granular Fill. Laboratory data results are attached. SIGNIFICANT GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES The significant geotechnical issues for the proposed construction addressed in this report include the following: the presence of granular and possible non-engineered fill within the footprint of the proposed addition; foundation bearing capacity and settlement; seismic design considerations; and the suitability of on-Site materials for use as engineered fill. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are provided for the construction assumed in this report and refer to the 9th Edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code (MSBC), which includes amendments to the 2015 International Building Code (IBC). Existing Granular Fill and Non-Engineered Fill Fill was encountered in the upper 3 to 8.5 feet in borings CD-1, CD-3, and CD-4, which was likely placed during construction of the existing building and paved areas to achieve final grades. The fill generally consists of medium dense to dense, fine to medium sand with little to trace silt, trace debris (brick, asphalt, ash, coal), and varying amounts of gravel and coarse sand. We recommend that the fill be removed from beneath footings. Based upon the boring observations, it appears that this material was placed in a relatively controlled manner, due to the relatively similar composition and density. In addition, the fill meets requirements for use as Granular Fill, based upon the results of the grain size analysis. Therefore, this material may remain in place below the floor slab of the proposed addition if it is adequately proof compacted and does not contain significant amounts of debris. If this material is left in place below the proposed addition, OTO should be retained during construction to verify that conditions do not differ from those assumed in this report. Non-engineered fill (soil containing more than a de minimis amount of debris) should be removed and replaced with compacted engineered fill. We note that debris fill is often Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 5 encountered immediately outside foundation walls, in landscaped areas, and within utility trenches. The entire addition footprint should be thoroughly proof compacted prior to the placement of any engineered fill. Proof compaction should be accomplished by a minimum of six passes with a 6,000-pound vibratory roller. This will ensure that the footings bear on a firm, dense surface and will limit differential settlement. Foundation Recommendations The proposed addition can be founded on normal spread footing foundations bearing on the densified Site soils or compacted engineered fill. Provided the recommendations presented in this section are followed, a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of exterior and isolated column footings. We estimate that settlement of footings and slabs bearing on the densified native soils or compacted engineered fill should be small and largely elastic in nature. Maximum settlements should be less than one inch and should occur relatively quickly after load application (during construction). We recommend that the structural engineer assume one inch of differential settlement between the existing building and the addition. Exterior footings should be embedded a minimum of 48 inches below the lowest adjacent grade for frost protection. Interior footings should bear at least two feet below the surrounding floor slab. Strip footings, beneath the load bearing walls, should be at least 18 inches wide. Isolated column footings should be at least 24 inches wide. All other applicable requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code (MSBC) should be followed. Footings should not be placed on frozen soils. Footing excavations should be free of loose, disturbed, or deleterious (debris, organic) materials. Any boulders or cobbles larger than four inches in diameter should be removed from within one foot of the bottom of the footings and replaced with Sand and Gravel fill. The footing subgrades should be densified immediately prior to placement of footing concrete with at least three passes with a vibrating plate compactor. If loose materials are present in the excavations, they shall be recompacted to form a firm, dense bearing surface. Concrete Slabs We recommend that concrete floor slabs bear on at least 12 inches of compacted Sand and Gravel fill to provide uniform support and a capillary moisture break. The subgrade should also be free of large boulders or cobbles, if encountered. The Sand and Gravel fill beneath the concrete slabs should meet the grain size distribution characteristics outlined in Table 2. The subgrade within the footprint of the proposed building should be stripped of topsoil, asphalt, and any deleterious (debris, organic) material. Prior to the placement of any engineered fill, we recommend that the building footprint be thoroughly densified to treat Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 6 any loose areas present. If deleterious material or soft/disturbed areas are present, these materials should be removed and recompacted or replaced with compacted Sand and Gravel. Fill supporting slabs should be placed in accordance with the recommendations presented on Sheet 1. Seismic Considerations Earthquake loadings must be considered under requirements in Section 1613 and 1806 of the 9th Edition (October 2017) of the Massachusetts State Building Code (MSBC). The 9th Edition of the MSBC is based upon the International Building Code 2015 (IBC) with Massachusetts amendments. Note that the IBC refers to ASCE-7 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Site Class and Earthquake Design Factors Section 1613 of the IBC covers lateral forces imposed on structures from earthquake shaking and requires that every structure be designed and constructed to resist the effects of earthquake motions in accordance with ASCE-7. Lateral forces are dependent on the type and properties of soils present beneath the Site, along with the geographic location. Per Table 1604.11, the maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration at short periods (Ss) and at 1-sec (S1) was determined to be 0.171 and 0.066, respectively, for Northampton, Massachusetts. Soil properties are represented through Site Classification. Procedures for the Site-specific determination of Site Classification are provided in Chapter 20 of ASCE-7. At this Site, we evaluated Site Classification using one of the parameters allowed, Standard Penetration Resistance (N-value). The Site Class was determined to be Class D based upon soil data collected. Furthermore, the Site coefficients Fa and Fv were determined according to Tables 1613.3.3(1) and 1613.3.3(2) of the IBC (2015), using both the Ss and S1 values and the Site Class. For this Site, Fa and Fv were determined to be 1.6 and 2.4, respectively. Liquefaction Section 1806.4 relates to the liquefaction potential of the underlying soils. The liquefaction potential was evaluated for saturated Site soils, using Figure 1806.4c of the MSBC. However, based upon the observed density and soil conditions, it is unlikely that significant amounts of liquefaction-induced settlement would occur under the design earthquake. In addition, loose soil layers below the maximum depth explored are not anticipated. Exterior Slabs and Pavements This section provides recommendations for exterior entryways, slabs, and sidewalks, as well as flexible and rigid pavements. Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 7 Entryways and Sidewalks Exterior concrete slabs, such as those at entryways and sidewalks adjacent to the building should be designed to mitigate differential frost movement between adjacent slabs, doorways, and pavements. To address this concern, we recommend that concrete slabs at entryways be underlain by four feet of non-frost susceptible Sand and Gravel fill. Where exterior slabs butt against hard surfaces, we recommend that for the area beyond the edges of the slab, the bottom of Sand and Gravel fill should transition gradually upward at a slope of 3H:1V or flatter (zone of influence). A typical detail showing an entryway fill area is shown on Sheet 2. We recommend that concrete sidewalks that are outside the zone of influence of the building and entryways, as well as areas where differential frost movement would not cause a tripping hazard, bear on at least 12 inches of imported, compacted Sand and Gravel to provide uniform support and a capillary moisture break. Fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations for compaction provided on Sheet 1. Subgrades should also be free of large boulders. We recommend that the entire subgrade of the sidewalk be proof compacted with a heavy vibrating roller to treat any loose areas. In addition, we recommend that the design team incorporate drainage into the sidewalk areas to remove water from the subgrade, in order to limit frost and the resulting vertical movement of sidewalks. The Sand and Gravel fill beneath the concrete slabs and sidewalks should meet the grain size distribution characteristics described in Table 2. Flexible Pavement Design We understand that the proposed pavements will likely experience loads from light passenger vehicles, ambulances, and occasional delivery trucks. We have proposed a relatively robust flexible pavement section for use in heavily trafficked areas, such as ambulance lanes and staging areas. Recommended designs are presented for both loading conditions in Table 1. Table 1 Pavement Design Sections Layer Thickness (in) Light Vehicle Heavy Traffic Asphalt Finish Course 1.5 2 Asphalt Binder Course 1.5 2 Gravel Base Course 12 18 The project civil engineer should review the design of the Asphalt Finish Course and Binder Couse Layers. We recommend that the pavement subgrade be proof compacted to treat any loose areas present. Table 2 presents recommendations for gradation requirements for the Gravel Base Course material. Please note that the Gravel Base Course specification is Mass Highway M1.03.1, Processed Gravel for Subbase. Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 8 Earthwork Considerations We anticipate that earthwork for this project will include the following: removal and replacement of non-engineered fill (where required); excavations for footings; placement of compacted engineered fill beneath the building, floor slab and pavements (as needed); and the treatment of the existing soils to address any localized loose areas that may be present. Engineered Fill Recommendations Three engineered fill types are recommended: • Sand and Gravel for use immediately beneath footings, floor slabs, and sidewalks • Gravel Base Course for use beneath pavements • Granular Fill for use as miscellaneous fill Grain size distribution requirements are presented in Table 2. On-Site soils may be suitable for reuse as engineered fill, if free from deleterious and/or oversized material. If the contractor elects to use the on-Site material as fill, we recommend that a representative sample be collected, and a grain size distribution analysis be performed to obtain approval by the engineer. Please note that the Sand and Gravel specification is approximately that for Mass Highway M1.03.0, Type B Gravel Borrow. Table 2 Grain Size Distribution Requirements Size Sand and Gravel Gravel Base Course Granular Fill Percent Finer by Weight 3 inch 100 100 100 1 ½ inch --- 70-100 --- ¾ inch --- 50-85 --- ½ inch 50-85 --- --- No. 4 40-75 30-60 --- No. 10 --- --- 30-90 No. 40 10-35 --- 10-70 No. 200 0-10 0-10 0-15 Compaction Recommendations Fill, debris, topsoil, and organic soils should be removed from beneath the building footprint and should not be reused as fill beneath structures. To avoid point loads, any cobbles or boulders larger than four inches in diameter, encountered at the subgrade should also be removed. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with compacted Sand and Gravel fill. Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Emergency Department Expansion Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts July 6, 2022 9 O:\J1500\1560 Cooley Dickenson Hospital\02-01 ED Expansion Project\Report\OTO Geotech Report Cooley Dickinson ED Expansion 2022 July.docx Prior to the placement of any engineered fill, we recommend that the entire building footprint be thoroughly proof compacted. Proof compaction should be accomplished by a minimum of six passes with a 6,000-pound vibratory roller. To facilitate compaction, the moisture content of the on-Site material should be maintained at or near the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557. Compacted fill should be placed in lifts ranging in thickness between 6 and 12 inches depending on the size and type of equipment. Recommended degrees of compaction and compaction means and methods are presented on Sheet 1. Compaction within five feet of existing foundations should be performed using a hand-operated roller or vibratory plate compactor. Placement and compaction of engineered fill should proceed on both sides of frost walls, so that the difference in top of fill on either side does not exceed two feet. FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES It is recommended that O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. (OTO) be retained during final design to prepare and/or review appropriate specification sections and drawings, if necessary. During construction phases, we recommend that OTO be retained to provide engineering support and to document subgrade conditions and preparation. We appreciated the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely yours, O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. Dustin A. Humphrey, P.E. Ashley L. Sullivan, P.E. Project Manager Principal Attachments: Limitations, Site Locus, Site Plan, Sheets, Boring Logs, Laboratory Data Sheet LIMITATIONS 1. The observations presented in this report were made under the conditions described herein. The conclusions presented in this report were based solely upon the services described in the report and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of the project or the time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached to our proposal. 2. The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part upon the data obtained from widely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between these explorations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. 3. The generalized soil profile described in the text is intended to convey trends in subsurface conditions. The boundaries between strata are approximate and idealized and have been developed by interpretations of widely spaced explorations and samples; actual soil transitions are probably more erratic. For specific information, refer to the boring logs. 4. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the proposed structures are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing by O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates Inc. It is recommended that we be retained to provide a general review of final plans and specifications. 5. Our report was prepared for the exclusive benefit of our client. Reliance upon the report and its conclusions is not made to third parties or future property owners. PROJECT No. FIGURE No. 293 Bridge Street, Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 413.788.6222 www.OTO-ENV.com COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEP. EXPANSION NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS SITE LOCUSO:\J1500\1560 Cooley Dickenson Hospital\02-01 ED Expansion Project\Figures\Figure 1 - Site Locus.pdfJ1560-02-01 1 Map Version: 1964 Current As Of: 1979 Date: JUNE 2022 Topographic Map Quadrant: EASTHAMPTON, MA SITE 1:25,000 SCALE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929 10 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL 0 1000 FEET 0 0.5 1.0 MILES 0 0.5 1 KILOMETERS PROJECT NO. FIGURE NO.293 Bridge Street, Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 413.788.6222O'Reilly, Talbot & OkunE N G I N E E R I N G A S S O C I A T E Swww.OTO-ENV.comAPPROXIMATE FOOTPRINTOF PROPOSED ADDITION COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITALEMERGENCY DEP. EXPANSIONNORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTSSITE PLANO:\J1500\1560 Cooley Dickenson Hospital\02-01 ED Expansion Project\Figures\Figure 2 - Site Plan.pdfJ1560-02-01 2 DESIGNED BY: JE DRAWN BY: JE CHECKED BY: DAH DATE: 6/23/2022 REV. DATE: NOTES: 1. BASE MAP PROVIDED TO OTO IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO TAPED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN FROM EXISTING SITE FEATURES 3. ALL DATA IS TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE ONLY TO THE DEGREE IMPLIED BY THE METHODS USED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN CD-1 CD-2 CD-4 CD-3 APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATIONPERFORMED BY SEABOARD DRILLING ON6/8/2022, OBSERVED BY OTO LEGEND:SCALE IN FEET1" = 30' 0'15'30'60' PROJECT No. SHEET No. 293 Bridge Street, Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 413.788.6222 O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun E N G I N E E R I N G A S S O C I A T E S www.OTO-ENV.com Westfield Intermodal Transit Center Elm and Arnold Streets Westfield, Massachusetts N O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] ENGINEERING SITE C 2003 National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Topographic Map Quadrant: West Springfield, MA Map Version: 1977 Current as of: 1979 Table 1-1 Degree of Compaction Recommendations Location Minimum Compaction Below Structures (Foundations and Slabs) 95% Below Pavements/Sidewalks/Exterior Slabs 95% Against Basement Walls/Retaining Walls 92% Utility Trenches 95% General Landscaped Areas 90% Notes. 1. Percentage of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor ASTM D1557, Method C. 2. When location falls into two or more categories, the engineer should be notified to determine appropriate compaction efforts and/or methods. 3. Crushed stone should be compacted in lifts of 12 inches to form a dense matrix using either traditional compaction methods (vibratory plate and/or roller) or tamping with an excavator bucket in deep excavations. It is generally not necessary to perform laboratory or field density testing on crushed stone. Table 1-2 General Guidelines for Compaction Means and Methods Compaction Method Maximum Stone Size (Inches Diameter) Maximum Lift Thickness (Inches) Minimum Number of Passes Below Structures & Pavement Non- Critical Areas Below Structures & Pavement Non- Critical Areas Hand-operated Vibratory Plate and confined spaces 3 6 8 6 4 Hand-operated vibratory drum roller (less than 1000 pounds) 3 6 8 6 4 Hand-operated vibratory drum roller (at least 1,000 pounds) 6 8 10 6 4 Light vibratory drum roller (minimum 3000 pounds) 6 10 14 6 4 Heavy vibratory drum roller (minimum 6000 pounds) 6 12 18 6 4 Note: The contractor should reduce or stop drum vibration if pumping of the subgrade is observed. GENERAL COMPACTION GUIDELINESO:\J1500\1560 Cooley Dickenson Hospital\02-01 ED Expansion Project\Figures\Sheet 1 - Compaction.pdfDESIGNED BY: ALS DRAWN BY: DAH CHECKED BY: MJT DATE: 11/09/2016 REV. DATE: 06/23/2022 1 COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITALEMERGENCY DEP. EXPANSION NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS J1560-02-01 PROJECT No. SHEET No. 293 Bridge Street, Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 413.788.6222 O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun E N G I N E E R I N G A S S O C I A T E S www.OTO-ENV.com TYPICAL FOUNDATION SECTIONO:\J1500\1560 Cooley Dickenson Hospital\02-01 ED Expansion Project\Figures\Sheet 2 - Foundations.pdfDESIGNED BY: ALS DRAWN BY: DAH CHECKED BY: MJT DATE: 11/9/2016 REV. DATE: 6/23/2022 2 NOTES: 1. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY 2. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, REFER TO OTO's GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED JULY 2022 3. UNPAVED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE LOAM CAP AND SHOULD BE GRADED TO DIRECT SURFACE FLOW AWAY FROM BUILDING 4. PERMEABLE BACKFILL SHALL BE USED IN AREAS WITH UNDERDRAIN SYSTEMS COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEP. EXPANSION NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS J1560-02-01 BASE/SUBBASE TYPICAL FOUNDATION SECTIONSLAB ON GRADE FOOTING WITH ENTRANCE SLAB 13 FLOOR SLAB PREPARED SUBGRADE SAND ANDGRAVEL FILLGRANULARFILL SAND AND GRAVEL SEE NOTES 3 AND 4 PERIMETERDRAINAGESYSTEM TO BEDESIGNED BYOTHERS 4' (MIN) PAVEMENT SECTIONENTRANCE SLAB SLOPING PEROSHA STANDARDS BLOWS/FOOT (SPT N-Value) 0-4 Very soft 4-10 Soft 10-30 Medium Stiff 30-50 Stiff >50 Very stiff Hard MATERIAL FRACTION SMALLEST Coarse DIAMETER Fine None SILT Coarse 1/4" (pencil)Clayey SILT Medium 1/8"SILT & CLAY Fine 1/16"CLAY & SILT SILT/CLAY see adjacent table 1/32"Silty CLAY COBBLES 1/64"CLAY BOULDERS TERM % OF TOTAL and 35-50% some 20-35% little 10-20% trace 1-10% PID: Soil screened for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. Torvane: Undrained shear strength is estimated using an E285 Pocket Torvane (TV). Values in tons/ft2. Penetrometer: Unconfined compressive strength is estimated using a Pocket Penetrometer (PP). Values in tons/ft2. SUMMARY OF THE BURMISTER SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (MODIFIED) RELATIVE DENSITY (of non-plastic soils) OR CONSISTENCY (of plastic soils) STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) 1/4" to 3/4"GRAVEL 15-30 >30 MATERIAL: (major constituent identified in CAPITAL letters) COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS 8-15 1/16" to 1/4" Method: Samples were collected in accordance with ASTM D1586, using a 2" diameter split spoon sampler driven 24 inches. If samples were collected using direct push methodology (Geoprobe), SPTs were not performed and relative density/consistency were not reported.N-Value: The number of blows with a 140 lb. hammer required to drive the sampler the middle 12 inches. WOR: Weight Of Rod (depth dependent) WOH: Weight Of Hammer (140 lbs.) *Based upon uncorrected field N-values RQD: Rock Quality Designation is determined by measuring total length of pieces of core 4" or greater and dividing by the total length of the run, expressed as %. 100-90% excellent; 90-75% good; 75-50% fair; 50-25% poor; 25-0% very poor. COMMON FIELD MEASUREMENTS Wetted sample is rolled in hands to smallest possible diameter before breaking. Very High Cannot distinguish individual particles SAND 3" to 6" in diameter > 6" in diameter Note: Boulders and cobbles are observed in test pits and/or auger cuttings. ORGANIC SILT: Typically gray to dark gray, often has strong H2S odor. May contain shells or shell fragments. Light weight. Fibrous PEAT: Light weight, spongy, mostly visible organic matter, water squeezed readily from sample. Typically near top of layer. Fine grained PEAT: Light weight, spongy, little visible organic matter, water squeezed from sample. Typically below fibrous peat. DEBRIS: Detailed contents described in parentheses (wood, glass, ash, crushed brick, metal, etc.) BEDROCK: Underlying rock beneath loose soil, can be weathered (easily crushed) or competent (difficult to crush). Fill: Material used to raise ground, can be engineered or non-engineered. Varved clay: Fine-grained, post-glacial lake sediments characterized by alternating layers (or varves) of silt, sand and clay. ADDITIONAL CONSTITUENTS BORING LOGS COMMON TERMS Glacial till: Very dense/hard, heterogeneous mixture of sand, silt, clay, sub-angular gravel. Deposited at base of glaciers, which covered all of New England. IDENTITY High Non-plastic Slight PLASTICITY Finest visible & distinguishable particles 3/4" to 3" Low Medium GRAIN SIZE RANGE 1/64" to 1/16" Dense Very dense COHESIVE SOILSCOHESIONLESS SOILS BLOWS/FOOT CONSISTENCY(SPT N-Value) <2 2-4 4-8 RELATIVE DENSITY Very loose Loose Medium dense Page 1 of 2 32.0 225.5 Doug F. 8 Jarrett S. N/A Hollow Stem Auger A (1 5/8" O.D.) FIRST (ft)19.0 2" O.D. Split Spoon LAST (ft)N/A Automatic TIME (hr)N/A 140 lb / 30" DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 7/24 S-1 0.2 1(1-3')PPM 3.0 222.5 16/24 S-2 0.0(3-5')PPM 10/24 S-3 0.0 (5-7')PPM 12/24 S-4 0.0 (10-12')PPM 0/24 S-5 0.0(15-17')PPM 13/24 S-6 0.0 (17-19')PPM 206.5≡ 18/24 S-7 0.0 (20-22')PPM 21/24 S-8 0.0 25.5 200.0 (25-27)PPM 2 26.5 199.0 1.Soil screened in field using MiniRAE Lite photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million (PPM) by volume.2.Dense drilling conditions observed from 25-30' FINE TO MEDIUM SAND CLAY AND SILT FINE TO MEDIUM SAND Bottom 3": Medium dense, dark brown, fine to medium SAND, little silt, trace gravel, trace debris (brick, asphalt), damp (FILL; rock at tip) LOG OF BORING PROJECT Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion CONTRACTOR Seaboard Environmental Drilling START DATE 6/8/2022 DISTURBED SAMPLES HELPER CASE DIAMETER N/A JOB NUMBER 1560-02-01 FINAL DEPTH (ft)DRILLING EQUIPMENT B-53 Truck Mounted Rig LOCATION Northampton, MA SURFACE ELEV (ft)FOREMAN CASING CD-1 ENGINEER/SCIENTIST Jhonatan Escobar WATER LEVEL ROD TYPE HAMMER DROP N/A FINISH DATE 6/8/2022 UNDISTURBED SAMPLES BIT TYPE HAMMER WGT N/A BORING LOCATION Northeastern portion of proposed addition SAMPLER ROCK CORING INFORMATION HAMMER TYPE TYPE N/A HAMMER WGT/DROP SIZE N/A DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER) REMARKS/WELL CONSTRUCTION PENETR.RESIST. (bl / 6 in) REC.(in)TYPE/NO. FIELDTEST DATA PROFILE 4" ASPHALT; 5" Dark brown, fine to medium SAND, little silt,little gravel, damp (BASE COURSE) 11/15/14/17 Top 4": Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace silt, damp ASPHALTBASE COURSE FILL 5' 3/5/5/5 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, damp 12/12/10/9 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, dry 10' 3/2/4/3 Loose, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace (-) silt, damp 15' 6/4/4/3 NO RECOVERY 3/2/2/3 Loose, light brown, medium SAND, little fine sand, trace coarse sand,trace (-) silt, trace fine gravel, damp 20' 1/2/3/4 Loose, light brown to gray, medium SAND, little fine sand, trace fine gravel, trace coarse sand, trace (-) silt, wet 25' 2/5/14/19 Top 8": Medium dense, brown, medium SAND, little fine sand, trace (-) silt, wet CD-1 Remarks:PROJECT NO.1560-02-01 LOG OF BORING Middle 9": Very stiff, brown, CLAY and SILT, trace fine sand, wet (varved) Bottom 4": Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, dry Page 2 of 2 DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 11/24 S-9 0.0 (30-32')PPM 32.0 193.5 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (Continued) SAMPLES REMARKS/WELLCONSTRUCTION DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER)PENETR.RESIST.(bl / 6 in) FIELDTESTDATA LOG OF BORING REC.(in)TYPE/NO. PROFILE CD-1 Job No.1560-02-01 Medium dense, light brown, fine SAND, some medium sand, trace (-) silt, dry End of exploration at 32' 35' 30' 60' 55' 50' 45' 40' 7/10/19/21 Page 1 of 1 27.0 226.0 Doug F. 7 Jarrett S. N/A Hollow Stem Auger A (1 5/8" O.D.) FIRST (ft)19.5 2" O.D. Split Spoon LAST (ft)N/A Automatic TIME (hr)N/A 140 lb / 30" DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 1 17/24 S-1 0.0 1.5 224.5 (1-3')PPM 14/24 S-2 0.0 (3-5')PPM 11/24 S-3 0.0 (5-7')PPM 5/24 S-4 0.0(10-12')PPM 15/24 S-5 0.0 (15-17')PPM 206.5 20.0 206.0 24/24 S-6 0.0 2 (20-22')PPM 25.0 201.0 13/24 S-7 0.0 (25-27')PPM 27.0 199.0 1. Soil screened in field using MiniRAE Lite photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million (PPM) by volume.2. WOH = Weight of rods and 140 lb. hammer. CLAY AND SILT FINE SAND CD-2 FINE TO MEDIUMSAND End of exploration at 27' Remarks:PROJECT NO.1560-02-01 LOG OF BORING 25' 6/7/7/8 Medium dense, red to brown, fine SAND, little silt, damp (1/2" layer of silt at top) 20' WOH for 18"/5 Very soft, brown to gray, CLAY and SILT, little fine sand, trace medium sand, wet (varved) 3/5/5/6 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace fine gravel, trace (-) silt, damp (two 1/2" layers of silt near bottom) 15' trace gravel, damp (fractured stone in middle of sample) 10' 4/5/6/5 Medium dense, dark brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace (-) silt, 5' Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, trace coarse sand, dry 4/5/5/7 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, dry 12/14/10/8 trace (+) silt, damp (7" dark brown layer at center) little medium sand, damp (BASE COURSE)Bottom 13": Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, 6" ASPHALT; 4" Dark brown, fine SAND, some gravel, some silt,little medium sand, damp (BASE COURSE) 12/12/14/15 Top 4": Medium dense, dark brown, fine SAND, some gravel, some silt, ASPHALTBASE COURSE DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER) REMARKS/WELL CONSTRUCTION PENETR.RESIST. (bl / 6 in) REC.(in)TYPE/NO. FIELDTEST DATA PROFILE BORING LOCATION Northwest portion of proposed addition SAMPLER ROCK CORING INFORMATION HAMMER TYPE TYPE N/A HAMMER WGT/DROP SIZE N/A ENGINEER/SCIENTIST Jhonatan Escobar WATER LEVEL ROD TYPE HAMMER DROP N/A FINISH DATE 6/8/2022 UNDISTURBED SAMPLES BIT TYPE HAMMER WGT N/A LOG OF BORING CD-2 PROJECT Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion CONTRACTOR Seaboard Environmental Drilling START DATE 6/8/2022 DISTURBED SAMPLES HELPER CASE DIAMETER N/A JOB NUMBER 1560-02-01 FINAL DEPTH (ft)DRILLING EQUIPMENT B-53 Truck Mounted Rig LOCATION Northampton, MA SURFACE ELEV (ft)FOREMAN CASING Page 1 of 2 37.0 226.0 Doug F. 10 Jarrett S. N/A Hollow Stem Auger A (1 5/8" O.D.) FIRST (ft)19.5 2" O.D. Split Spoon LAST (ft)N/A Automatic TIME (hr)N/A 140 lb / 30" DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 14/24 S-1 0.0 1(1-3')PPM 8/24 S-2 0.0(3-5')PPM 16/24 S-3 0.0 (5-7')PPM 11/24 S-4 0.0 (7-9')PPM 8.5 217.5 12/24 S-5 0.0 (10-12')PPM 5/24 S-6 0.0(15-17')PPM 206.5≡ 13/24 S-7 0.0 (20-22')PPM 25.0 201.0 15/24 S-8 0.0 (25-27')PPM 1. Soil screened in field using MiniRAE Lite photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million (PPM) by volume.2. WOH = Weight of rods and 140 lb. hammer. FINE TO MEDIUM SAND CLAY AND SILT CD-3 FILL Remarks:PROJECT NO.1560-02-01 LOG OF BORING Middle 8": Medium dense, brown, medium SAND, some fine sand, little coarse sand, trace gravel, wet Bottom 2": Stiff, dark gray to brown, silty CLAY, some fine sand, wet (varved) 25' 2/5/6/3 Top 5": Stiff, dark gray to brown, CLAY and SILT, some fine sand, wet (varved) 20' 3/2/3/3 Loose, light brown, medium SAND, some fine sand, trace coarse sand, trace (-) silt, wet 3/4/3/4 Loose, light brown, medium SAND, some fine sand, trace (-) silt, damp 15' 10' 4/6/6/6 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, damp Middle 4": Dense, dark brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (+) silt, trace debris (coal), damp (FILL)Bottom 2": Dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, damp 20/26/24/20 Top 5": Dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (+) silt, damp (FILL) 5' 8/12/14/19 Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace debris (coal), trace silt, damp (FILL) 4/5/13/18 Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace fine gravel, little to trace silt, damp (FILL) trace debris (ash), damp (FILL) 4" ASPHALT; 8" Brown, fine SAND, some gravel, little medium sand, trace silt, damp (BASE COURSE) 6/7/6/9 Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace gravel, trace (+) silt, ASPHALTBASE COURSE DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER) REMARKS/WELL CONSTRUCTION PENETR.RESIST. (bl / 6 in) REC.(in)TYPE/NO. FIELDTEST DATA PROFILE BORING LOCATION Southwestern portion of proposed addition SAMPLER ROCK CORING INFORMATION HAMMER TYPE TYPE N/A HAMMER WGT/DROP SIZE N/A ENGINEER/SCIENTIST Jhonatan Escobar WATER LEVEL ROD TYPE HAMMER DROP N/A FINISH DATE 6/8/2022 UNDISTURBED SAMPLES BIT TYPE HAMMER WGT N/A LOG OF BORING CD-3 PROJECT Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion CONTRACTOR Seaboard Environmental Drilling START DATE 6/8/2022 DISTURBED SAMPLES HELPER CASE DIAMETER N/A JOB NUMBER 1560-02-01 FINAL DEPTH (ft)DRILLING EQUIPMENT B-53 Truck Mounted Rig LOCATION Northampton, MA SURFACE ELEV (ft)FOREMAN CASING Page 2 of 2 DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 22/24 S-9 0.0 2 (30-32')PPM 16/24 S-10 0.0 35.5 190.5 (35-37')PPM 37.0 189.0 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 60' 55' 50' 45' 40' trace gravel, trace silt, dry End of exploration at 37' 35' 7/15/17/16 Top 4": Hard, dark gray to brown, silty CLAY, little fine sand, wet (varved) Bottom 12": Dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, little coarse sand, 30' WOH for 6"/Soft, dark gray to brown, silty CLAY, little fine sand, wet (varved)1/1/1 CLAY AND SILT (Continued) Job No.1560-02-01 LOG OF BORING CD-3 DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER) REMARKS/WELLCONSTRUCTION PENETR.RESIST.(bl / 6 in) REC.(in)TYPE/NO. FIELDTESTDATA PROFILE Page 1 of 1 11.0 225.0 Doug F. 5 Jarrett S. N/A Hollow Stem Auger A (1 5/8" O.D.) FIRST (ft)N/E 2" O.D. Split Spoon LAST (ft)N/A Automatic TIME (hr)N/A 140 lb / 30" DEPTH (ft)ELEV. 12/24 S-1 0.0(1-3')PPM 15/24 S-2 0.0(3-5')PPM 5.0 220.0 2/24 S-3 0.0 (5-7')PPM 3/24 S-4 0.0 (7-9')PPM 17/24 S-5 0.0 (9-11')PPM 11.0 214.0 1. Soil screened in field using MiniRAE Lite photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million (PPM) by volume. CD-4 FILL FINE TO MEDIUMSAND Remarks:PROJECT NO.1560-02-01 LOG OF BORING 25' 20' 15' End of exploration at 11' 3/2/4/4 Loose, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (-) silt, damp 10' 5/4/4/3 Loose, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace (-) silt, damp 5' 6/5/4/5 Loose, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace fine gravel, trace (-) silt, damp (rock at tip) 8/5/5/5 Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace fine gravel, trace debris (brick), trace (-) silt, damp (FILL) trace debris (brick) (FILL) 4" ASPHALT; 8" Dark brown, fine to medium SAND, little silt, little gravel, damp(BASE COURSE) 9/10/9/10 Medium dense, brown, fine to medium SAND, some gravel, trace silt, ASPHALTBASE COURSE DEPTH (ft)/SAMPLES SAMPLES SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(MODIFIED BURMISTER) REMARKS/WELL CONSTRUCTION PENETR.RESIST. (bl / 6 in) REC.(in)TYPE/NO. FIELDTEST DATA PROFILE BORING LOCATION Southeastern portion of proposed addition SAMPLER ROCK CORING INFORMATION HAMMER TYPE TYPE N/A HAMMER WGT/DROP SIZE N/A ENGINEER/SCIENTIST Jhonatan Escobar WATER LEVEL ROD TYPE HAMMER DROP N/A FINISH DATE 6/8/2022 UNDISTURBED SAMPLES BIT TYPE HAMMER WGT N/A LOG OF BORING CD-4 PROJECT Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion CONTRACTOR Seaboard Environmental Drilling START DATE 6/8/2022 DISTURBED SAMPLES HELPER CASE DIAMETER N/A JOB NUMBER 1560-02-01 FINAL DEPTH (ft)DRILLING EQUIPMENT B-53 Truck Mounted Rig LOCATION Northampton, MA SURFACE ELEV (ft)FOREMAN CASING