Loading...
17A-297 13-429 140 Hillcrest Dr Florence Energy Efficiency PlanPage 1 of 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN Project Address: 140 Hillcrest Drive, Florence, MA Conditioned Floor Area 2,391 sq ft Building Type Single Family Detached Residence Bedrooms 3 1. Assumptions for Preliminary Home Energy Rating CET has completed a Preliminary Home Energy Rating with the following assumptions: a) The construction plans you have provided are accurate, including window dimensions and locations. b) Energy features not listed below in part c will meet the prescriptive requirements of the IECC 2009. c) The home will be built to incorporate the following energy features: Building Envelope Specifications Used in Analysis Basement Condition Full height basement insulated in walls, crawlspace insulated in ceiling Foundation Walls Insulation= 2” Thermax (basement), none (crawlspace) R-Value= 13, 0 Under Basement Slab Insulation Type = Rigid Foamboard R-Value= 10 Crawlspace Ceiling Insulation Type = Fiberglass Batts R-Value= 30 Rim & Band Joist Insulation Type = 1" Rigid Foamboard + Fiberglass Batts R-Value= 18 Above Grade & Walkout Walls Insulation Type = Dense-pack Cellulose + 1/2" Rigid Exterior Foamboard (Insulated Zip system) R-Value= 19.25 + 3.6 Grade=1 Windows & Glass Doors U-value = .29 predominant SHGC = .25 predominant Ceilings Insulation Type = Loose Blown Cellulose (flats), Dense-pack Cellulose (slopes) R-Value= 38, 38 Blower Door Test* 3.0 ACH50 or better Thermal Enclosure Checklist Sections 3 5 Meet ALL Checklist Requirements as verified by a HERS rater at pre- drywall and final inspection Mechanical Systems Specifications Used in Analysis Heating Equipment Type: Ducted Air-Source Heat Pump Efficiency: 9.0 HSPF, 10 KW electric resistance back-up Cooling Equipment Type: Ducted Air-Source Heat Pump Efficiency: 13 SEER Water Heating Equipment Type: Electric Heat Pump Efficiency: 240% Duct Leakage 6 CFM per 100 sq. ft. of finished floor area during duct test or less leakage to the outside at final inspection Duct Location 35% conditioned basement, 35% unconditioned crawlspace, 20% unconditioned attic, 10% conditioned space Whole House Ventilation (ASHRAE 62.2) High efficiency ERV/HRV, with controls capable of delivering 54-65 CFM continuous equivalent ventilation (2010 ASHRAE 62.2 Standard) Photovoltaic System 9.65 KW, South-Facing, 504 sq ft array, 97.5% inverter efficiency Lighting & Appliances Specifications Used in Analysis Lighting 80% or more compact fluorescent bulbs or LEDs Refrigerator Energy Star Certified Dishwasher Energy Star Certified ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN Page 2 of 2 ~ Please send signed form to the Center for EcoTechnology Tel (413) 586-7350 ext.242 ~ Fax (413) 586-7351 ~ greenhome@cetonline.org 2. Preliminary Home Energy Rating Results Based on the assumptions described above, we have calculated the following Preliminary Home Energy Rating results. Preliminary HERS Index: 20 Preliminary Improvement Over 2012-2013 v2 Massachusetts Reference Home: 27.0% ENERGY STAR HERS Index Target: N/A Note that Confirmed Home Energy Rating results may vary from the Preliminary Home Energy Rating results due to changes in building plans, energy features installed in the home, RESNET standards, software changes, and other factors. 3. Services Requested CET will provide a Confirmed Home Energy Rating for the purpose(s) indicated below. CET will charge fees for these activities based on the Price List attached to your Home Energy Rating Services Agreement. Stretch Energy Code compliance Mass Save Residential New Construction Performance Program Incentives – Tier I or II Mass Save Residential New Construction Performance Program Incentives – Tier III ENERGY STAR version 3 certification As part of these services, CET will verify that your home meets all the requirements listed in the attached Program Description. CET Internal Use Only HERS Rater: John Saveson Date of Preliminary Rating: 3/19/14 REM/Rate File Name: 13-429 140 Hillcrest Dr Florence plans.blg Form v2013-02-20 I have reviewed and understand this Energy Efficiency Plan. I have reviewed the assumptions in part 1 and confirm that the assumptions are correct. Signature: Date: Printed Name: Company: