31B-269 47 Ctr St T&B report 2011
47 Center Street
Northampton, Massachusetts
RTN 1-13601
Immediate Response Action
Completion Statement, Phase IV
Completion Statement, & Class A-2
Response Action Outcome Statement
Prepared For:
47 Center Street, LLC
Holyoke, Massachusetts
July 2011 Tighe&Bond Government • Real Estate • Education • Health Care • Industry
CONTENTSCONTENTS
Table of Contents Tighe&Bond
i
Section 1 Introduction
1.1 Release History ..............................................................................1-1
1.2 Conceptual Site Model ....................................................................1-2
1.3 Site Hydrology and Geology .............................................................1-3
1.3.1 Topography and Drainage ..................................................... 1-3
1.3.2 Surficial Geology and Soils .................................................... 1-3
1.3.3 Bedrock Geology .................................................................. 1-3
1.3.4 Groundwater Flow Direction ................................................... 1-3
1.4 Surrounding Resource Areas ............................................................1-3
1.5 Groundwater and Soil Classification ..................................................1-3
Section 2 Summary of Remediation and Site Assessment Activities
2.1 Site Remediation Activities ..............................................................2-1
2.1.1 Soil Excavation .................................................................... 2-1
2.1.2 Soil & Groundwater Treatment ............................................... 2-1
2.2 Soil Boring Advancement ................................................................2-1
2.2.1 Soil Conditions ..................................................................... 2-1
2.3 Monitoring Well Installation .............................................................2-2
2.4 Soil Sampling ................................................................................2-2
2.5 Groundwater Sampling ...................................................................2-2
2.6 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling .............................................2-3
2.7 Soil Gas/Indoor Air Sampling ...........................................................2-3
2.8 Management of Remediation Waste ..................................................2-3
Section 3 Nature and Extent of Release
3.1 Soil Analytical Results .....................................................................3-1
3.1.1 Excavation Confirmatory Sample Results ................................. 3-1
3.1.2 Soil Boring Sample Results .................................................... 3-1
3.2 Groundwater Analytical Results ........................................................3-1
3.3 Surface Water and Sediment Analytical Results ..................................3-2
3.4 Soil Gas/Indoor Air Analytical Results ...............................................3-2
3.5 LNAPL ...........................................................................................3-2
Section 4 Risk Characterization
4.1 Selection of Risk Characterization Method .........................................4-1
4.2 Determination of Applicable Standards ..............................................4-1
4.3 Exposure Pathway Evaluation ..........................................................4-1
4.3.1 Soil .................................................................................... 4-1
4.3.2 Groundwater ....................................................................... 4-1
4.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment ................................................. 4-1
4.3.4 Soil Gas/Indoor Air ............................................................... 4-1
Table of Contents Tighe&Bond
ii
4.4 Identification of Exposure Point Concentrations ..................................4-2
4.4.1 Soil .................................................................................... 4-2
4.4.2 Groundwater ....................................................................... 4-2
4.5 Characterization of Risk Harm ..........................................................4-2
4.5.1 Human Health, Public Welfare and Environment ....................... 4-2
4.5.2 Public Safety ....................................................................... 4-3
4.6 Feasibility of Achieving Background ..................................................4-3
4.7 Representativeness Evaluation and Data Useability Assessment ...........4-3
Section 5 Response Action Outcome and Public Notification
5.1 Response Action Outcome ...............................................................5-1
5.2 IRA and Phase IV Completion ..........................................................5-1
5.3 Public Notification ...........................................................................5-1
Appendices
A Figures
Figure 1 Site Locust Map
Figure 2 MassGIS Map
Figure 3 Site Plan
B Data Tables and Analytical Laboratory Reports
Table 1 Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 Soil Gas and Indoor Air Analytical Results
Table 4 NAPL Monitoring Results
Method 3 Risk Assessment Short Form
C Boring Logs
D Public Notification Documents
E Limitations
J:\N\N0633\N0633\REPORT\2011 RAO\N0633 RAO April 2011.Doc
1SECTION 1
Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 1-1
Section 1
Introduction
1.1 Release History
On behalf of 47 Center Street, LLC, Tighe & Bond has prepared this Class A-2 Response
Action Outcome (RAO) Statement, including an Immediate Response Action (IRA) and
Phase IV Completion statement to document the historical release and subsequent
closure of a No. 2 fuel oil release from a former underground storage tank (UST) at 47
Center Street, Northampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts (the site).
A subsurface release of No. 2 fuel oil was discovered at the site during the removal of a
1,000 gallon fuel oil UST on August 28, 2000. In response to the release, 44 tons of
petroleum impacted soils were excavated, disposed off site and four groundwater
monitoring wells were installed at the site by Cold Spring Environmental Consultants,
Inc. (CSEC). CSEC submitted an IRA plan to the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (MA DEP) on January 24, 2001 recommending the installation
of additional groundwater monitoring wells at the site.
Environmental Compliance Services, Inc. (ECS) of Agawam, Massachusetts was
contracted by the former site owner in July 2001. Between August 2001 and January
2003, ECS installed eight additional groundwater monitoring wells and one groundwater
extraction well at the site. Light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) was detected in six
wells at the site. Between January 2001 and January 2006, ECS conducted bail and
gauge activities at the site and removed a total of 19 gallons of an LNAPL/groundwater
mixture from groundwater monitoring wells.
ECS submitted a Phase I Initial Site Investigation report to MA DEP in August 2001, a
Phase II Scope of Work in September 2001, a Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment
Report and Phase III Remedial Action Plan in September 2005.
Exceedences of applicable Method 1 Groundwater Cleanup Standards for extractable
petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) and/or target polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
were detected in site groundwater during a sampling event in January 2003 by ECS.
Exceedences of applicable Method 1 Soil Cleanup Standards for volatile petroleum
hydrocarbons (VPH) were also identified at the site. This sampling was performed using
bailers.
On December 1, 2006 Tighe & Bond submitted a change of LSP letter to the MA DEP,
thereby changing the LSP-of-record for the site from Virginia Irvine of ECS to Tighe &
Bond.
On May 18, 2007, Tighe & Bond submitted an IRA Status Report for the site. IRA
activities summarized in the report included the replacement of an additional
downgradient groundwater monitoring well (MW-13), installation of two soil borings (B-1
and B-2 for soil observations), installation of additional groundwater monitoring wells at
the site, LNAPL gauging and groundwater sample collection.
In July 2007, Tighe & Bond submitted a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) for
the site. The Phase IV RIP proposed the implementation of in-situ chemical oxidation
(ISCO) as an appropriate remedial technology for the site to help reduce LNAPL
Section 1 Introduction Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 1-2
thickness. More specifically, the injection of a catalyzed mixture of peroxide and sodium
persulfate was proposed as an appropriate Comprehensive Remedial Action (CRA) to
help remove or reduce the LNAPL at the site. As discussed herein, prior to chemical
injections, all wells sampled via low flow sampling since 2005 did not contain petroleum
compounds above applicable GW-2 and GW-3 standards and still contained vaying
thickness of LNAPL.
On January 21, 2008, Tighe & Bond submitted an IRA Status and Phase IV Status Report
for the site. IRA and Phase IV activities summarized in the status report include LNAPL
gauging and removal activities and ISCO injection activities.
On May 19, 2008, Tighe & Bond submitted an IRA Status Report for the site. IRA and
Phase IV activities summarized in the report included the results of multiple rounds of
LNAPL gauging/removal and the results of one comprehensive round of low-flow
groundwater sampling. On April 9, 2008, groundwater samples were collected from
multiple monitoring wells throughout the site. Groundwater analytical results identified
temporary elevated EPH concentrations in two monitoring wells (MW-7 & MW-10) at
concentrations above applicable GW-2/GW-3 cleanup standards. As discussed herein,
concentrations in these two wells further stabilized to below GW-2 and GW-3 standards
(pre injection conditions).
1.2 Conceptual Site Model
The site is located in an urban/downtown area of Northampton, Massachusetts, and is
the location of a former Masonic Lodge, containing one brick building that is currently
not occupied. The City of Northampton municipal water supply provides drinking water
to the site and to surrounding properties. Surface water bodies are not located at, or in
close proximity to, the subject site.
One 1,000 gallon No. 2 fuel oil UST was removed from the site on August 28, 2000. The
UST was removed from the northeastern corner of the site and provided fuel to the
boiler located in the basement of the building. Documents prepared by CSEC, who
observed removal of the UST, indicated that petroleum impacted soil and groundwater
were observed in the tank grave when the UST was removed. Observations at the time
of UST removal indicate that the UST system failed, resulting in a historical release of
No. 2 fuel oil to the subsurface. The volume of fuel oil released at the site is unknown.
Fuel oil is currently provided to the basement boiler via a 330 gallon aboveground
storage tank located in the basement boiler room.
The former UST was located adjacent to the building foundation in the northeast corner
of the site. Soil conditions observed throughout the site are generally very fine sand,
silt and clay. Gauging data collected from monitoring wells throughout the site indicate
that groundwater is between approximately five and eight feet below surface grade.
LNAPL has been identified in exterior and interior monitoring wells installed through the
basement concrete slab of the building. Groundwater at the site is approximately eight
to 12 inches below the top of the basement concrete slab and five to eight feet below
surface grade.
All portions of the site in the vicinity of the former UST are paved. Nuisance odors have
not been identified at the site. Points of exposure to site contaminants include potential
indoor air impacts at the site building. Exposure to contaminated soil and groundwater
Section 1 Introduction Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 1-3
at the site is not likely and would only occur in the event of direct exposure to
subsurface soil and/or groundwater (e.g. excavation).
1.3 Site Hydrology and Geology
1.3.1 Topography and Drainage
The site is paved and is generally flat. Stormwater at the site flows to the north,
toward the grass area at the 2-4 Center Court residential property or toward the south
and into the Center Street roadway where catch basins are located.
1.3.2 Surficial Geology and Soils
Surficial soils at the site generally consist of very fine sand and silt with varying amounts
of clay. Groundwater at the site has been identified between five and eight feet below
surface grade. Boring logs for subsurface work conducted by Tighe & Bond in 2007 are
provided in Appendix C.
1.3.3 Bedrock Geology
Bedrock has not been encountered during assessment activities performed at the site.
1.3.4 Groundwater Flow Direction
Based on Figure 3 contained in previous reports prepared by ECS, the calculated
groundwater flow direction is to the northeast.
1.4 Surrounding Resource Areas
The site is located within a Non-Potential Drinking Water Source Area. The Mill River is
located approximately 2,000 feet west of the site. NHESP Priority Habitats for Rare
Wildlife and NHESP Estimated Habitats for Rare Wildlife are located approximately 1,800
feet west of the site. A Potentially Productive Medium Yield Aquifer is located
approximately 2,500 feet east of the site. Protected and Recreational Open Space is
located approximately 700 feet south, 2,000 feet south southwest, 1,300 feet east, and
1,800 feet northeast of the site. No surface water bodies are located at, or adjacent to,
the site. A MA DEP Priority Resource Area map is provided as Figure 2 in Appendix B.
1.5 Groundwater and Soil Classification
Groundwater and soils at disposal sites are characterized for risk characterization
purposes based upon location and uses of the site and site groundwater. Specific
Method 1 Standards have been developed for both soil and groundwater based upon
these uses and the potential for human and environmental exposure. Groundwater and
soil category classification criteria are set forth in 310 CMR 40.0932 and 40.0933,
respectively, and are summarized here for applicability to the site.
Three groundwater classifications have been developed by the MA DEP with respect to
the following criteria, as outlined in the MCP:
GW-1: GW-1 Standards apply within current or potential drinking water source
areas, which include areas such as public water supply Zone II areas,
undeveloped but Potentially Productive Aquifers (PPAs), and areas within 500 feet
of a private drinking water well. GW-1 is not applicable to the site.
Section 1 Introduction Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 1-4
GW-2: GW-2 Standards apply to groundwater considered to be a potential
source of vapors to indoor air. GW-2 is defined as groundwater that is within 15
feet of the ground surface and within 30 feet of an occupied structure. GW-2 is
applicable to the site.
GW-3: GW-3 applies to all groundwater in Massachusetts, based on its potential
to discharge to surface water. Therefore, GW-3 is also applicable to the site.
Soils at a site are classified based upon the potential for human exposure. These
potentials are based upon children’s and adults’ frequency of use of the area (high, low
or not present), the intensity of the use (high or low) and the accessibility of the soils
(accessible, potentially accessible or isolated). These criteria are listed in 310 CMR
40.0933(4) and are used to define exposure potentials for the three soil classifications
developed by DEP. Based on the applicability of each of these criteria, soils are
classified as S-1, S-2 or S-3. Category S-1 soil represents soil with the greatest
exposure potential while category S-3 represents soil with the least exposure potential.
Based on the known activities at the site (high frequency and low intensity use by adults
and children), the depth of residual impacted soil at the site and because the site is
paved, site soil is categorized as S-2.
2SECTION 2
Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 2-1
Section 2
Summary of Remediation and Site
Assessment Activities
2.1 Site Remediation Activities
2.1.1 Soil Excavation
A total of 44 tons of petroleum impacted soils was removed from the UST area by CSEC
following the August 28, 2000 UST removal.
2.1.2 Soil & Groundwater Treatment
On October 23 & 24, 2007, Redox Tech, LLC of Attleboro, Massachusetts was onsite to
perform ISCO remedial injection activities. Approximately 5,250 gallons of water and
sodium persulfate slurry were injected into 17 injection points throughout the release
area. A total of 15,400 pounds of sodium persulfate was injected at the site.
2.2 Soil Boring Advancement
A total of 20 soil borings have been advanced at the site since August 2000 to evaluate
soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the former UST. Seventeen of the soil
borings have been completed as groundwater monitoring wells. Soil borings have been
advanced using both hollow stem auger drilling methodology and direct push methods.
Soil boring and monitoring well locations are shown on the Figure 3 Site Plan in
Appendix A. Soil borings were advanced to a maximum of 23 feet below surface grade.
Multiple soil samples were collected from each soil boring. Select soil samples were
screened in the field for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a
photoionization detector (PID).
2.2.1 Soil Conditions
Three soil borings were advanced at the site by Tighe & Bond. Soil borings B-1, B-2 and
monitoring well MW-13 were advanced on May 30, 2007. Soil boring locations are
shown on the Figure 3 Site Plan in Appendix B. Soil boring MW-13 was completed as a
two inch groundwater monitoring well with a ten foot screened interval set to intersect
the observed groundwater table. Under the observation of a Tighe & Bond
Environmental Scientist, each of the three borings was advanced using 4.25 inch hollow
stem auger drilling methodology. Soil samples were collected from each boring. Soil
borings B-1 and B-2 were advanced near the former UST. Soil boring MW-13 was
advanced southeast of the former UST, across the Center Court roadway. Boring logs
from B-1, B-2 and MW-13 are included in Appendix C.
Soil boring B-1 was advanced to 19 feet below surface grade and soil samples were
collected continuously from five to 19 feet below surface grade. In general, soil
conditions encountered in B-1 were brown to grey silt and clay. Groundwater was
identified in B-1 at approximately 8.5 feet below surface grade. No overt evidence of oil
saturated soil was observed in this boring. At the time B-1 was advanced, the adjacent
monitoring well MW-1 was gauged and found to contain 8 inches of fuel oil.
Section 2 Summary of Remediation and Site Assessment Activities Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 2-2
Soil boring B-2 was advanced to 14 feet below surface grade and soil samples were
collected continuously from ten feet to 14 feet below surface grade. In general, soil
conditions encountered in B-2 were brown silt and clay. Groundwater was identified in
B-2 at approximately ten feet below surface grade. No overt evidence of oil saturated
soil was observed in this boring.
Soil boring MW-13 was advanced to 22 feet below surface grade and soil samples were
collected in five foot intervals from the ground surface to 22 feet below surface grade.
In general sand and urban fill were encountered to approximately seven feet below
surface grade and brown to grey silt and clay were encountered from ten to 22 feet
below surface grade. Groundwater was identified in MW-13 at approximately 12 feet
below surface grade. Soil boring MW-13 was completed as a groundwater monitoring
well. No overt evidence of oil saturated soil was observed in this boring.
Boring logs documenting borings B-1, B-2 and MW-13 are included in Appendix C.
2.3 Monitoring Well Installation
Seventeen groundwater monitoring wells have been installed as part of assessment and
remediation activities performed at the site since August 2000. Three monitoring wells
have been installed through the interior basement concrete slab. Thirteen viable
groundwater monitoring points currently remain at the site.
2.4 Soil Sampling
CSEC collected a total of five soil samples from the limits of the UST excavation for
laboratory analysis in September 2000. ECS advanced multiple soil borings and installed
several groundwater monitoring wells at the site between December 2000 and January
2003. ECS submitted a total of seventeen soil samples for laboratory analysis.
2.5 Groundwater Sampling
CSEC collected groundwater samples from the site on December 28, 2000. ECS
collected groundwater samples from the site on January 27, 2003 and July 12, 2005.
Following the October 2007 remedial injection, Tighe & Bond collected groundwater
samples from the site on April 9, 2008, September 25, 2008 and March 25, 2011. The
groundwater monitoring wells sampled during these sampling events are identified
below:
April 9, 2008: EW-1, MW-6, MW-7 & MW-9
September 25, 2008: MW-7 & MW-10
March 25, 2011: EW-1, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8D, MW-9D & MW-10
Each groundwater sample was collected in general conformance with Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) approved low-flow/low-stress groundwater sampling
methodology. Groundwater samples were submitted to Test America Laboratory of
Westfield, Massachusetts (TAL) for extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (EPH) and/or
volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) analyses.
Section 2 Summary of Remediation and Site Assessment Activities Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 2-3
2.6 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling
Surface water bodies are not located at or adjacent to the site. Neither surface water
nor sediment samples have been collected from the site.
2.7 Soil Gas/Indoor Air Sampling
Soil gas and indoor air samples were collected from the site on March 25, 2011. One
sub-slab soil gas sample, identified as SG-1, was collected in the site building from
below the concrete basement slab. One indoor air sample, identified as IA-1, was
collected within the building basement.
2.8 Management of Remediation Waste
Petroleum impacted soils were excavated from the site on August 28, 2000 during the
removal of the 1,000 gallon fuel oil UST. Forty-four tons of petroleum impacted soils
were excavated and transported off site for proper disposal.
LNAPL removal activities performed at the site to date have generated approximately 25
gallons of a LNAPL and groundwater mixture. LNAPL and groundwater removed from
site monitoring wells has been stored in a steel 55 gallon drum in a plastic overpack.
The drum was transported off site for proper disposal in March 2011.
3SECTION 3
Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 3-1
Section 3
Nature and Extent of Release
3.1 Soil Analytical Results
3.1.1 Excavation Confirmatory Sample Results
Five confirmatory soil samples, identified as E-Side-6’, Bot-E 9.5’, Bot-W 10.0, NW-Cor,
and SE-Cor, were collected from the UST grave by CSEC as part of the August 2000
UST removal. Each soil sample was submitted to a state certified laboratory for EPH
analysis. Soil sample analytical results are summarized Table 1 in Appendix B. As
indicated in Table 1, concentrations of EPH carbon fractions and EPH target analytes
were not detected above laboratory reporting limits in soil samples E-Side-6’, Bot-E 9.5’
or Bot-W 10.0. Concentrations of EPH carbon fractions, 2-methylnaphthalene and
phenanthrene were detected above laboratory reporting limits, but significantly below
Method 1 S-1/GW-2 and S-2/GW-2 cleanup standards, in soil samples NW-Cor and SE-
Cor.
3.1.2 Soil Boring Sample Results
Seventeen soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis from 15 soil borings
advanced at the site. Soil samples were submitted to a state certified laboratory for EPH
and/or volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) analysis. Soil sample analytical results are
summarized in Table 1 in Appendix B. As indicated in Table 1, concentrations of EPH
and/or VPH constituents were identified above laboratory reporting limits in soil samples
MW-4 (10’-12’), MW-6 (10’-12’), MW-10 (0-2’), SB-1 (5’-10’), SB-1 (7.5’-10’) and SB-3
(6.5’). Moreover, concentrations of petroleum constituents were detected above Method
1 S-1/GW-2 cleanup standards in soil samples MW-10 (0-2’) and SB-1 (7.5’-10’). More
specifically, concentrations of C9-C10 aromatic hydrocarbons were detected in soil
sample MW-10 (0-2’) at 120 mg/kg, above the Method 1 S-1/GW-2 cleanup standard of
100 mg/kg. Concentrations of naphthalene were detected in soil sample SB-1 (7.5’-10’)
at 450 mg/kg, above the Method 1 S-1/GW-2 and S-2/GW-2 cleanup standard of 40
mg/kg. With the exception of the two exceedances detailed above, positive detections
of petroleum constituents in soil were below the Method 1 S-1/GW-2 and S-2/GW-2
cleanup standards.
3.2 Groundwater Analytical Results
Following the October 23 and 24, 2007 remedial injection, Tighe & Bond collected
groundwater samples from the site on April 9, 2008, September 25, 2008 and March 25,
2011. Each groundwater sample was collected in general conformance with EPA low-
flow/low-stress groundwater sampling methodology and submitted to TAL for analysis.
Groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for EPH and/or VPH analysis. Groundwater
analytical results are summarized in Table 2 in Appendix B.
As shown in Table 2, wells MW-7 and MW-10 were the only wells that displayed a
temporary increase in contaminant concentrations above applicable standards following
the chemical injection events. Wells MW-7 and MW-10 have since stabilized to pre-
injection conditions and are currently below applicable Method 1 standards. All other
remaining groundwater monitoring wells display contaminant concentrations below
applicable Method 1 standards.
Section 3 Nature and Extent of Release Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 3-2
3.3 Surface Water and Sediment Analytical Results
Neither surface water nor sediment is located at, or within close proximity to, the
subject site. Neither surface water nor sediment has been sampled as part of
assessment activities performed at the site.
3.4 Soil Gas/Indoor Air Analytical Results
One soil gas sample and one indoor air sample have been collected from the site. On
March 25, 2011, one soil gas sample, identified as SG-1, was collected from below the
basement concrete slab of the site building and one indoor air sample, identified as IA-1,
was collected from within the basement. Soil gas sample SG-1 was collected over a 30
minute interval. Indoor air sample IA-1 was collected over an eight hour interval. Each
soil gas and indoor air sample was collected in a laboratory-supplied six liter SUMMA
canister and submitted to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory (Con-Test) of East
Longmeadow, Massachusetts for air petroleum hydrocarbons (APH) analysis. A copy of
Con-Test laboratory report number 11C0885 is included in Appendix B. Soil gas and
indoor air analytical results are summarized in Table 3 in Appendix B. Within Table 3,
soil gas results are compared to Method 2 Soil Gas Screening Levels for Evaluating
Indoor Air Impacts and indoor air results are compared to MADEPs Residential Typical
Indoor Air Concentrations.
As indicated in Table 3, concentrations of APH were identified in the soil gas sample
SG-1 that was well below the Method 2 soil gas screening levels.
As indicated in Table 3, concentrations of APH were identified in the indoor air sample
IA-1 that were below the indicated 75th and 90th percentile concentrations. Only the
concentration of C5-C8 aliphatics was detected at above the 75th percentile
concentrations but below the 90th percentile concentration.
It should be noted that one 330 gallon above ground fuel oil storage tank is located in
the basement and provides fuel to the boiler located in the basement.
3.5 LNAPL
Light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) has been historically identified in several
groundwater monitoring wells at the site. A summary of LNAPL gauging and recovery is
included as Table 4 in Appendix B. As indicated in Table 4, approximately 41 LNAPL
gauging and removal events have been conducted at the site. Within Table 4, wells with
a measured LNAPL thickness greater than ½ inch following the October 2007 remedial
injections are shaded.
As part of each LNAPL gauging event, measurable amounts of LNAPL were removed from
wells using either a bailer or a peristaltic pump with single-use polyethylene tubing. Oily
groundwater/LNAPL removed from wells was stored on site in an over packed 55-gallon
steel drum. As detailed in Table 4, a total of approximately 21.55 gallons of oily
groundwater and LNAPL has been removed from site groundwater monitoring wells
between December 29, 2000 and March 25, 2011.
As detailed in Section 2.2, soil conditions encountered at the site generally consist of silt
and clay to the maximum depth of boring advancement at the site, or 22 feet below
surface grade. Silt and clay soils are generally defined by their very small grain size
and, as a result, have more pore spaces and relatively high porosity. The small pore
Section 3 Nature and Extent of Release Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 3-3
spaces and high porosity of silts and clays result in increased surface tension, cohesion
and adhesion of groundwater within the subsurface formations. As a result,
groundwater does not easily flow or move through silts and clays and the specific yield
of these formations are very low as compared to sand and gravel, resulting in very low
permeability or hydraulic conductivity. The low permeability/hydraulic conductivity of
the silt and clay formations at the site significantly decrease the mobility of groundwater
and greatly reduce the migration potential of LNAPL at the site.
As summarized in Table 4 in Appendix B, LNAPL thicknesses in many of the wells have
varied significantly over the years of gauging. LNAPL thicknesses in the wells is a
function of many parameters, including soil type, groundwater elevation, and well
diameter.
In general, as the well diameter decreases, LNAPL thicknesses in the well increase. Most
wells are 1-inch diameter wells. The recovery well located within the former UST grave
is a 4-inch diameter well and has largely not had measurable oil in the well.
Soil types with finer grained silts/clays have much higher pore pressures than soils that
contain more sands and gravel. Higher pore pressures will result in a greater volume of
residual oil slowly accumulating in the wells.
As groundwater elevations increase, LNAPL thickness will tend to decrease and as
groundwater elevations decrease, LNAPL thicknesses in wells will tend to increase.
These conditions have been observed at the site.
It is generally recognized that in most subsurface soils, groundwater and LNAPL coexist
in soil pores and any LNAPL present will displace some of the groundwater within the soil
pores. The amount of LNAPL within soil pores generally decreases with depth until
LNAPL is not present and groundwater is not displaced. When a monitoring well or bore
hole penetrates the saturated zone, LNAPL and groundwater migrate into the well and
the thickness of the LNAPL within the well is generally greater than the actual thickness
of the oil in the aquifer. Because groundwater and LNAPL coexist in soil pores and
groundwater remains in the soil pores, the amount of oil in the soil formation is
significantly less than the measured LNAPL thickness in monitoring wells. The very low
concentrations of petroleum constituents detected in site soils, summarized in Table 1 in
Appendix B and observations of soil located adjacent to wells with LNAPL, provide
further evidence that soils are not saturated with LNAPL, that groundwater and LNAPL
coexist within soil pores at the site and that the measured thickness of LNAPL in site
monitoring wells is not representative of soil conditions.
It is evidenced by the gauging data that the LNAPL recovery performed over the years
has gradually reduced LNAPL thickness in wells. But LNAPL is still detectable within site
wells. The chemical injections were targeted to help reduce overall LNAPL
concentrations. An average LNAPL thickness was calculated for all wells gauged from
2008 to current from wells that historically contained measurable LNAPL, including MW-3
as this well is located within the source area. The 2008 data to current were selected
for the average as these data better represent stabilized groundwater conditions
following the chemical injections that were performed. The calculated average was 0.59
inches, which is slightly above the MCP upper concentration limit (UCL) of LNAPL of 0.5
inches.
Based on the information presented above, it is our opinion that the LNAPL levels
measured in site monitoring wells is not representative of actual site conditions with the
Section 3 Nature and Extent of Release Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 3-4
soil formation with respect to true oil thickness and does not accurately represent the
amount of LNAPL in soils at the site.
There is not appropriate guidance for calculating LNAPL thickness for comparison to the
UCL standard of 0.5 inches. Based on a relatively low average thickness calculated for
the recent gauging event from 2008 to current, primarily small diameter one-inch
diameter wells and silty/clay soils that don’t contain elevated petroleum concentrations
or observable oil saturated soils, the true oil thickness with the soil formation is likely
well below 0.5 inches. This is further supported by the 4-inch diameter well EW-1 that
has an approximate average thickness of 0.18 inches for gauging data from 2005 to
present.
DEP is currently working on new guidance for LNAPL projects that does not focus on the
0.5-inch standards. Although current draft documents should not be cited or quoted, a
draft approach circulated for comment included evaluating LNAPL sites with respect to
mobility, source control, and future risk. The criteria was as follows:
1. Adequate data for mobility evaluation with respect to soil properties, LNAPL
properties, and soil saturation. LNAPL recovery rates have been extremely low since
release discovery. During the years of periodic well gauging, LNAPL was removed.
Based on soil concentrations, soil types, and volume recovered, there is limited
LNAPL volume in the subsurface that is recoverable and corresponding dissolved
concentrations are below applicable standards. Therefore, based on data presented
above, adequate data have been collected with respect to mobility evaluations.
2. Has source been eliminated or controlled:
LNAPL migration – for this site, LNAPL is not migrating. Perimeter and
downgradient wells have not seen increase in LNAPL since release discovery. Some
residual LNAPL was temporality mobilized during chemical injections but this condition
has since returned to pre-injection conditions.
Groundwater contamination – for this site, groundwater concentrations are below
GW-2 and GW-3 criteria.
Vapor intrusion – for this site, vapor intrusion was demonstrated not to be
occurring.
3. Does LNAPL pose future risk to public welfare or environment – for this site, LNAPL
does not pose future risk to public or environment based on soil and groundwater
concentrations.
4. Does LNAPL pose future risk to public safety or human health – for this site, LNAPL
does not pose future risk to public safety or human health based on soil and
groundwater concentrations.
Therefore, based on the above draft criteria being met, a permanent solution Class
Response Action Outcome (RAO) can be achieved.
4SECTION 4
Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 4-1
Section 4
Risk Characterization
In support of this RAO statement, the characterization of risk at the site has been
evaluated in accordance with the Method 2/3 Risk.
4.1 Selection of Risk Characterization Method
In accordance with the 310 CMR 40.0980, Method 2 may be used to characterize the
risk of harm to health, public welfare, and the environment at disposal sites where site
investigations conducted in accordance with the MCP have determined that the release
of oil and/or hazardous material is limited to soil and/or groundwater. Because low-level
concentrations of APH have been identified in soil gas and indoor air at the site, limited
site-specific information has been used.
For evaluation of soil contaminants, MADEP Method 3 Risk Assessment Short forms for
residential exposure scenarios were used to evaluate risk to residual soil contaminants.
4.2 Determination of Applicable Standards
As detailed in Section 1.5, groundwater categories GW-2 and GW-3 are applicable to the
site.
4.3 Exposure Pathway Evaluation
4.3.1 Soil
Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected from the site indicate that residual
concentrations of petroleum constituents are present in subsurface soils at the site.
Subsurface soil is a potential exposure pathway at the site.
4.3.2 Groundwater
Laboratory analytical results from groundwater samples collected from the site on March
25, 2011 were below applicable GW-2 and GW-3 standards, indicating that residual
concentrations of petroleum constituents are present in site groundwater.
4.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment
No surface water bodies and/or sediments are located at the site and surface water and
sediment have not been impacted by this historical release. Surface water is not
considered a potential exposure pathway.
4.3.4 Soil Gas/Indoor Air
Laboratory analysis of soil gas and indoor air samples collected from the site on March
25, 2011 indicate that residual concentrations of APH are preset in soil gas and indoor
air at the site. Based on comparison of soil gas concentrations to Method 2 screening
levels established by the DEP and indoor air concentrations that are consistent with
typical residential indoor air concentrations, soil gas and indoor air are not considered
potential exposure pathways.
Section 4 Exposure Pathway Evaluation Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 4-2
4.4 Identification of Exposure Point Concentrations
Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) represent the concentration of oil and/or
hazardous material to which a human or environmental receptor may come in contact.
An exposure point may be defined as an area or zone of potential exposure, as well as a
single discrete point.
To remain conservative, soil EPCs were determined based on the maximum
concentrations detected for each detected compound of concern (COC). COCs detected
in soil include EPH and VPH carbon ranges, naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene,
phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (mixed isomers) and
naphthalene.
Groundwater EPCs were selected as the most recent groundwater sampling result for
each monitoring well. Since pre injection groundwater conditions were also all below
GW-2 and GW-3 standards (except earlier results from samples collected with bailers),
using the most recent results is appropriate. Since wells MW-7 and MW-10 temporarily
increased following chemical injections, these results are not considered representative
of groundwater conditions and therefore not used as part of the EPC. Concentrations
within these wells decreased to pre injection conditions. MW-8 (destroyed now, was
only sampled once in 2003 with a bailer) is not representative of site conditions. As
other wells sampled with a bailer that were subsequently resampled using low flow were
below standards, the one result from MW-8 is therefore not considered representative of
site conditions.
4.4.1 Soil
Twenty-two discrete soil samples have been collected from the site for laboratory
analysis between September 27, 2000 and January 27, 2003. Soil analytical results are
summarized in Table 1 in Appendix B. As indicated in Table 1, soil samples were
collected between five feet and 25 feet below surface grade. Concentrations of
petroleum constituents have been detected above laboratory reporting limits in eight of
the 22 soil samples submitted for analysis. Based on the maximum concentrations
being used as the EPC, the residual soil contamination does not pose a risk to human
health based on the results of the Method 3 Risk Assessment Short Form included in
Appendix B.
4.4.2 Groundwater
Seventeen groundwater monitoring wells have been installed and sampled at the site.
Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 2 in Appendix B. As indicated in
Table 2, dissolved concentrations of petroleum constituents temporarily increased in
monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-10 following the October 2007 remedial injection.
However, analytical results from the March 25, 2011 groundwater sampling event
showed a stabilization of petroleum concentrations to pre-injection conditions. With the
exception of MW-8 (as discussed above), representative groundwater concentrations are
below applicable Method 1 GW-2 and GW-3 Cleanup Standards.
4.5 Characterization of Risk Harm
4.5.1 Human Health, Public Welfare and Environment
Soil and groundwater EPCs are discussed above. Calculated soil EPCs do not pose a risk
to human health based on the results of the Method 3 Risk Assessment Short Form.
Section 4 Exposure Pathway Evaluation Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 4-3
Representative groundwater concentrations are less than Method 1 GW-2 and GW-3
standards and therefore is an indicator of lack of exposure potential. No soil or
groundwater concentrations exceed UCLs. LNAPL thicknesses within the soil formation
are also less than the UCL of 0.5 inches. Based on these data, it is our opinion that a
condition of No Significant Risk of harm to human health, public welfare and the
environment exists at the site.
4.5.2 Public Safety
No rusted or corroded drums or containers, open pits, lagoons, or dangerous structures
are located at the site. No threats of fire or explosion, including the presence of
explosive vapors resulting from a release of oil and/or hazardous materials are located
at the site. No uncontained materials which exhibit the characteristics of corrosivity,
reactivity or flammability are located at the site. Based on the information presented
within this report, a condition of No Significant Risk of harm to public safety exists at the
site.
4.6 Feasibility of Achieving Background
The feasibility of achieving background was evaluated following Immediate Response
Actions (IRAs) performed at the site. Background is defined as those levels of OHM that
would exist in the absence of the disposal site. For the purposes of assessing the
feasibility of achieving background, it is assumed that “background” concentrations of
petroleum constituents at the site are non-detect.
Residual petroleum concentrations are present in soil and groundwater at the site,
including residual LNAPL. Due to the tight silty/clay soil formations, the only
remediation strategy to fully remove any residual LNAPL in the subsurface is soil
excavation, which would require excavation beneath the existing structure. In
accordance with DEP Policy WSC-04-160, excavation beneath structures that may
compromise the structural integrity are considered “infeasible”.
4.7 Representativeness Evaluation and Data Useability
Assessment
The project involved field screening of soil samples with a photoionization detector
(PID), laboratory analysis of 22 soil samples, laboratory analysis of multiple rounds of
groundwater samples, and the collection and analysis of one soil gas and one indoor air
sample. Soil samples were analyzed for EPH and/or VPH. Groundwater samples were
analyzed for metals, EPH and VPH. Soil gas and indoor air samples were analyzed for
APH. Groundwater quality parameter measurements were collected from site monitoring
wells. Sampling has been conducted at the site since 2000 and has been performed in
compliance with MCP Data Quality Enhancement (DQE) protocols. The MCP Case
Narratives and Analytical Method Report Certification Forms are included in the soil gas
and indoor air and analytical reports provided in Appendix B. In accordance with the
DQE protocols, the laboratory analytical reports were reviewed for compliance with the
DQE policy.
The laboratory reports indicate that the soil gas and indoor air analytical data included in
this report meet all the requirements for “Presumptive Certainty” as described in Section
2.0 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the DEP documents CAM VII, Quality Assurance and Quality
Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data. Based on a
review of the data, field observations, and the laboratory MCP Case Narrative
Section 4 Exposure Pathway Evaluation Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 4-4
description, the data collected during cleanup and monitoring activities are
commensurate with their intended use and meet the PARCCS (precession, accuracy,
repetitiveness, completeness, comparability and sensitivity) criteria, recommended for
specifying quality assurance goals by the MA DEP. Sampling protocols and results are
discussed with respect to these criteria below.
Precision: Precision is the degree to which a set of observations or measurements of
the same property, usually obtained under similar conditions, conform to themselves.
Precision may be quantifiably measured through analysis of duplicates, or as discussed
in the Compendium of Analytical Methods (CAM), in lieu of field duplicates, sampling
precision related to the non-homogeneity of the impacted matrix may be most
appropriately addressed via the analysis of an adequate data set of samples using field
screening techniques. Twenty-two discrete soil samples were collected from the site and
screened in the field with a PID and submitted for laboratory analysis. In general, PID field
screening results, visual and olfactory observations, and laboratory analytical results
conform to each other.
Multiple rounds of groundwater sampling were performed at the site and multiple
groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. In general, concentrations of
petroleum constituents in site groundwater have decreased over time. In general, the
concentrations of petroleum constituents identified in site groundwater corroborate with
soil field screening results, soil analytical results and field observations while collecting each
groundwater sample.
Accuracy: Accuracy is the degree of agreement of a measurement with an accepted
reference or true value. QA/QC performance standards that were not met by the
laboratory are discussed in the MCP Case Narratives provided in the analytical laboratory
reports included in Appendix B. MCP regulatory standard criteria were specified for each
report.
According to the MCP Case Narrative in Con-Test analytical report number 11C0885 for soil
gas and indoor air samples collected on March 25, 2011, continuous calibration did not
meet method specifications and was biased on the high side for methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE). Data validation is not affected since the sample result was “not detected” for
MTBE.
According to the MCP Case Narrative in TAL analytical report 360-32914-1 for groundwater
samples collected on March 25, 2011, some laboratory reporting limits do not meet WSC-
CAM-III method reporting limits. Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, n-Hexatriacontane, and
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene failed the criteria low for the closing Continuous Calibration
Verification (CCV), resulting in some reporting limits to be biased high. No other difficulties
were encountered during the EPH analysis and all other quality control parameters were
within acceptable limits. No QA/QC issues were identified.
Representativeness: Representativeness expresses the degree to which data
accurately and precisely represent a characteristic of a population, parameter variation,
or environmental condition. Twenty-two discrete soil samples were collected from the site
and screened in the field with a PID. Each soil samples was submitted for EPH and/or VPH
laboratory analysis. In general, soil samples with higher PID field screening results
exhibited elevated concentrations of petroleum constituents as compared to soil samples
with lower PID field screening results. We can infer from this favorable comparison that
the laboratory results are valid.
Section 4 Exposure Pathway Evaluation Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 4-5
Multiple rounds of groundwater sampling were performed at the site and multiple
groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis over an eleven year period.
In general, concentrations of petroleum constituents in site groundwater have decreased or
have been stable over time (discounting for the temporary increase due to chemical
injections).
Completeness: Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid data obtained from
a measurement system compared to the amount expected under normal conditions.
Twenty-two discrete soil samples were collected from the site. A total of 31
groundwater samples were collected from the site over an 11 year period. One soil gas
sample and one groundwater sample were collected from the site on March 25, 2011.
The disposal site boundary/limits of RAO are shown on the Figure 3 Site Plan in
Appendix B and measure approximately 60 feet by 60 feet. It is our opinion that the soil
sample density, spatial distribution of the soils samples submitted for laboratory
analysis, spatial distribution of groundwater monitoring wells, the number of
groundwater sampling events and the location and number of soil gas and indoor air
sampling events was sufficient to characterize the release area.
Comparability: Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be
compared to another. This project involved field screening of soil samples with a PID,
laboratory analysis of soil samples for EPH and/or VPH, laboratory analysis of multiple
groundwater samples for EPH and/or VPH, and laboratory analysis of soil gas and indoor
air samples for APH. All soil and groundwater samples were analyzed by the MA DEP
EPH and/or VPH method. Soil gas and indoor air samples were analyzed by the MA DEP
APH method rev1. These analytical methods are the most current methodologies for
these analyses and are appropriate for site characterization of the site contaminant
(No.2 fuel oil).
Sensitivity: Sensitivity is the ability of the method to detect contaminants of concern
at the concentrations of interest. Reporting limits for all analyses were below their
respective Cleanup Standards for samples analyzed as part of the remedial and
monitoring activities performed at the site.
Based on this evaluation, it is our opinion that the data is both useable and
representative of site conditions and is appropriate to support an RAO.
FSECTION 5
Tighe&Bond
Response Action Outcome Statement RTN 1-13601 5-1
Section 5
Response Action Outcome and Public
Notification
5.1 Response Action Outcome
On behalf of 47 Center Street, LLC, Tighe & Bond has completed this Class A-2 RAO for
RTN 1-13601 for a release of No. 2 fuel oil from a former UST located at 47 Center
Street in Northampton, Massachusetts. Based on our assessment, delineation and
remedial activities performed and our review of the data collected from the site, it is our
opinion that the soil and groundwater contaminant concentrations have been adequately
reduced and there are no complete exposure pathways that could result in potentially
significant exposures. Therefore, a condition of No Significant Risk exists at the site and
a Class A-2 RAO Statement is appropriate for this release. The disposal site boundaries
and limits of the RAO are indicated on the Figure 3 Site Plan in Appendix A. A portion of
the RAO boundary is within the public right-of-way fro Center Court, therefore the City
of Northampton has been provided notice of this RAO. The original RAO Statement
Transmittal Form (BWSC 104) was submitted via eDEP.
5.2 IRA and Phase IV Completion
The objectives of IRA activities at the site have been completed, which have included
periodic monitoring and gauging of LNAPL thickness, removal of LNAPL, and additional
environmental media sampling (soil, groundwater, soil gas, indoor air). It is the opinion
of Tighe & Bond that the response actions that are the subject of this submittal have
been developed and implemented in accordance with the MCP and adequately addressed
the IRA condition of LNAPL present at the site. No further immediate response actions
are proposed at this point.
Phase IV activities included chemical injections. No additional chemical injections are
proposed and therefore Phase IV activities are complete. No specific final Phase IV
inspection is necessary since no remedial system was constructed as part of the Phase
IV activities. Based on this RAO filing, Phase V Operation, Maintenance, and/or
Monitoring activities will not be required.
The original IRA Transmittal Form (BWSC-105) and Phase IV Transmittal Form (BWSC-
108) was submitted via eDEP.
5.3 Public Notification
In accordance with the public notification requirements of the MCP, 310 CMR
440.1403(3)(f) and (h), the City of Northampton has been notified of the submittal of
this RAO Statement. Copies of all public notification documents are provided in
Appendix D.
Report limitations are provided in Appendix E.
J:\N\N0633\N0633\REPORT\2011 RAO\N0633 RAO April 2011.doc
A
APPENDIX A
J:\N\N0633\GIS-PDFS\usgs.pdf V:\Projects\N\N0633\usgs.mxd
47 CENTER STREET
NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Tighe&Bond
MAY 2007SCALE 1:25,000
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCUS
Mass."
BASED ON USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FOR
EASTHAMPTON & MT HOLYOKE
MASSACHUSETTS QUADRANGLE
REVISED 1979
10-FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL µ
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
CIRCLES INDICATE 500-FOOT AND 1/2-MILE RADII.
SITE LOCATION
J:\N\N0633\GIS-PDFS\gis.pdf V:\Projects\N\N0633\gis.mxdr BrookM il l R i v e r
M ill RiverROCKY HILL
POND
M ill River NEDS DITCH
Conne
ctic
ut Ri
verConnecticut RiverMill Rive NORTHAMPTON
TATE
ELWELLISLAND
ROUND
HILL
MANHAN MEADOWS
PYNCHON MEADOWS
Elwell
Island
§¨¦91
tu5
tu5
!(10
!(66
!(9
!(9
INTERSTATE 91BRIDGE ROAD
N O O K R O A D
SO UTH STREETH
OC
K
A
N
U
M
R
O
A
D
DAMON ROAD
MOUNT TOM ROADPROSPECT STREETELM STREET
KINGS HI
GHWAYWALNUT TREES PATHOLD FERRY ROAD
STATE STREETRU S S ELL ST R E E T
E A S T H A M P T O N R O A D
F
EDERAL
ST
REETW E S T S T R E E T KI
NG STREETNORTH STREETLYMAN ROADJACKSON STREETAQUAVITAE ROAD
C
O
NZ STR
EET
LOCUST STREET
PLEASANT STREETPROSPECT AVENUEGROVE STREET MAIN STREETO X B O W R O A DHINCKLEY STREETFAI
R STREETC
O
O
K
E A
V
E
N
U
E
VERNON STREETTEXAS ROADRI
V
E
R
B
A
N
K
ROA
D
IN
D
U
S
T
RIAL D
RIV
E
H
A
WL
E
Y
ST
RE
E
T
POTASH ROADCOLLEGE LANELANE PLANT ROAD
PAR ADISE R O ADB R A D F O R D S T R E E T
U NIO N STR EETPOMEROY TERRACEC R O S B Y S T R E E TEAST STREETMAI
N AVENUEBRIDGE STREETC H E R R Y S TR E E TM ID D L E M E A D O W R O A D
REVELL AVENUE
L IN D E N S T R E E T
FAIR STREET
FIGURE 2
DEP PRIORITY RESOURCE AREAS
47 CENTER STREET
NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Tighe&Bond
MAY 2007SCALE 1:25,000
!Þ Community Public Water Supply - Groundwater
89:Non-Community Non-Transient PWS
89:I Non-Community Transient PWS
EPA Designated Sole Source Aquifer
DEP Approved Wellhead Protection Area (Zone2)
DEP Interim Wellhead Protection Area (IWPA)
Public Surface Water Supply Protection Area (ZoneA)
Lake, Pond, Stream or other Fresh Water Feature
Fresh Water Non-Forested Wetland
Salt Water Wetland
Protected and Recreational Open Space
NHESP Certified Vernal Pools
Solid Waste Landfill
X!Þ Community Public Water Supply - Surface water
Non Potential Drinking Water Source Area: Medium Yield
Non Potential Drinking Water Source Area: High Yield
Potentially Productive Medium Yield Aquifer
Potentially Productive High Yield Aquifer
Public Surface Water Supply (PSWS)
Limited Access Highway
Multi-Lane Highway, NOT Limited Access
Other Numbered Hwy
Major Road - Connector
Minor Street or Road
Track or Trail
Town Boundary
County Boundary
Train
!Powerline\Pipeline
Aqueduct
Major Drainage Basin
Sub Drainage Basin
USGS Quadrangle Boundary
µ
1,000 0 1,000500 Feet
Bay Estuary or other Salt Water Feature
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)
MassGIS DATA VALID AS OF APRIL 2007.
NHESP Priority Habitats for Rare Species
NHESP Estimated Habitats for Rare Wildlife
SITE LOCATION
BAPPENDIX B
47 Center Street, Northampton, Massachusetts RTN 1-13601Sample ID E-Side-6' Bot-E 9.5 Bot-W 10.0 NW-Cor SE-Cor MW-1D MW-2 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 MW-7 MW-8 MW-8D MW-9 MW-9D MW-10 SB-2 SB-3Method 2 Direct ContactDepth (feet)6' 9.5' 10' 8' 7' 22.5-25' 5-7' 11-13' 14-16' 10-12' 10-12' 10-12' 15-17' 17.5-20' 22.5-25' 17.5-20' 22.5-25'0-2' (beneath basement)5-10' 7.5-10' 17.5-20' 6.5'EPCs S-1/GW-2 S-1/GW-3 S-1PID Field Screening (ppm)2 10 15 25 15 ND 8 25 2 22 ND 19 ND ND ND ND ND 157 8.2-10.9 10.9 2.6 3(max valueDate of Collection27-Sep-00 27-Sep-00 27-Sep-00 28-Sep-00 28-Sep-00 20-Jan-03 7-Dec-00 5-Dec-00 5-Dec-00 5-Dec-01 24-Aug-01 24-Aug-01 24-Aug-01 20-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 23-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 20-Jan-03 27-Jan-03used)EPH Carbon Fractions (mg/Kg)C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons <40 <40 <40 120 390 <40 <40 <40 <40 130 <40 71 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <50 190 NA <40 130 390 1,000 1,000 20,000C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons <40 <40 <40 80 150 <40 <40 <40 <40 62 <40 48 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <50 45 NA <40 <40 150 3,000 3,000 20,000C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons <40 <40 <40 100 187 <40 <40 <40 <40 101 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 94 254 NA <40 123 254 1,000 1,000 10,000EPH Target Analytes (mg/Kg)Naphthalene <0.180 <0.180 <0.190 <0.190 <0.180 <0.220 <0.190 <0.190 <0.210 <0.210 <0.190 <0.190 <0.190 <0.200 <0.210 <0.210 <0.220 <0.240 0.23 NA <0.200 <0.210 ND 40 500 10,0002-Methylnaphthalene <0.180 <0.180 <0.190 0.46 0.68 <0.220 <0.190 <0.190 <0.210 0.71 <0.190 <0.190 <0.190 <0.200 <0.210 <0.210 <0.220 0.67 0.12 NA <0.200 <0.210 0.71 80 300 5,000Phenanthrene <0.180 <0.180 <0.190 0.27 0.27 <0.220 <0.190 <0.190 <0.210 <0.210 <0.190 <0.190 <0.190 <0.200 <0.210 <0.210 <0.220 0.58 0.3 NA <0.200 0.49 0.58 500 500 10,000Fluoranthene <0.180 <0.180 <0.190 <0.190 <0.180 <0.220 <0.190 <0.190 <0.210 <0.210 <0.190 <0.190 <0.190 <0.200 <0.210 <0.210 <0.220 0.41 <0.180 NA <0.200 0.49 0.49 1,000 1,000 10,000Pyrene <0.180 <0.180 <0.190 <0.190 <0.180 <0.220 <0.190 <0.190 <0.210 <0.210 <0.190 <0.190 <0.190 <0.200 <0.210 <0.210 <0.220 0.39 <0.180 NA <0.200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,000VPH Carbon Fractions (mg/Kg)C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 26 NA 11 <3.0 NA 26 100 100 5,000C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 NA 58 <0.650 NA 100 1,000 1,000 20,000C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 120 NA 62 <0.468 NA 120 100 100 100 5,000VPH Target Analytes (mg/Kg)Benzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.140 NA <0.060 <0.094 NA ND 30 30 9,000Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.140 NA <0.060 <0.094 NA ND 500 500 10,000Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.26 NA 190 <0.094 NA 190 500 500 10,000Xylenes (mixed Isomers) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.4 NA 190 <0.142 NA 190 300 500 10,000Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.7 NA 450 <0.094 NA 450 40 500 500 10,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.140 NA <0.060 <0.094 NA ND 100 100 5,000<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardND - not detectedUCLsTable 1Soil Analytical DataMW-3SB-1Method 1 Cleanup StandardsJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 2Groundwater Analytical Data47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601Sample IDMW-1Sampling Method GW-2 GW-3low flowbailerSampling Date1/27/03 7/12/05 12/12/07 1/16/08 4/9/08 3/25/11 6/7/07 1/16/08 2/15/08 4/9/08 12/28/00 7/12/05Metals (ug/L)Arsenic NS 900 9,000NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NASilver NS7 1,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NABarium NS50,000 100,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA 89 NA NA NA NA NABeryllium NS50 2,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA NA NACadmiumNS4 50 NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA NA NAChromium NS300 3,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NAAntimony NS8,000 80,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NASelenium NS100 1,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NALead NS10 150 NA NA NA NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NANickel NS200 2,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NAVanadium NS4,000 40,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NAZinc NS900 50,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <50 NA NA NA NA NAIron NSNS NS NA NA NA NA NA NA 22,000 NA NA NA NA NAManganese NSNS NS NA NA NA NA NA NA 5,000 NA NA NA NA NAThallium NS3,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA NA NAMercury NS20 200 NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.20 NA NA NA NA NAExtractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)2-Methylnaphthalene 2,000 20,000 100,000 46 11.7 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000 27 4.76 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Acenaphthylene 10,000 40 100,000 <5.0 NA NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Acenaphthene NS6,000 60,000 6 1.48 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Fluorene NS40 400 5.5 2.0 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Phenanthrene NS10,000 100,000 5.1 2.34 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Anthracene NS30 600 <5.0 NA NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Fluoranthene NS200 2,000 <5.0 NA NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0Pyrene NS20 800 <5.0 1.24 NA NA <10 <10 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <1.0C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000 920 1,200 NA NA 230 <100 NA NA NA NA <200 <200.C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NS 50,000 100,000 570 700 NA NA 250 100 NA NA NA NA <200 <200C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 50,000 5,000 100,000 3,000 1,500 NA NA 200 130 NA NA NA NA <200 <200Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)Benzene 2,000 10,000 100,000 <5.0 NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAToluene 50,000 40,000 100,000 6.1 NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAEthylbenzene 20,000 5,000 100,000 16 NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAXylenes (mixed Isomers) 9,000 5,000 100,000 76 NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NANaphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000 55 NA NA NA <10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAMethyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) 50,000 50,000 100,000 <5.0 NA NA NA <5.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAC5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 50,000 100,000 250 NA NA NA <100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAC9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000 530 NA NA NA <100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAC9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 7,000 50,000 100,000 970 NA NA NA 130 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASulfate (ug/L)NS NS NS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAField ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)NS NS NS NA NA 6.18 3.65 4.58 1.93 0.00 2.14 6.71 6.13 NA NAOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)NS NS NS NA NA 498 159 233 48 -144 323 184 -21 NA NApHNS NS NS NA NA 5.01 6.15 5.60 5.79 6.26 4.72 5.33 6.08 NA NASpec. Cond. (MilliSiemens/cm)NS NS NS NA NA 9.34 4.54 0.404 1.60 0.391 8.86 1.35 1.29 NA NATemperature (Celcius)NS NS NS NA NA 15.13 9.15 NA 7.17 15.5 11.30 11.76 14.22 NA NATurbidity (NTU)NS NS NS NA NA NA NA NA 16.4 15 NA NA NA NA NAMW-3Method 1 StandardsUCLsEW-1 MW-1D<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardBoxed value indicates concentration exceeds applicable Method 1 Cleanup StandardJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 2Groundwater Analytical Data47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601Sample IDSampling Method GW-2 GW-3Sampling DateMetals (ug/L)Arsenic NS 900 9,000Silver NS7 1,000Barium NS50,000 100,000Beryllium NS50 2,000CadmiumNS450Chromium NS300 3,000Antimony NS8,000 80,000Selenium NS100 1,000Lead NS10 150Nickel NS200 2,000Vanadium NS4,000 40,000Zinc NS900 50,000Iron NSNS NSManganese NSNS NSThallium NS3,000 30,000Mercury NS20 200Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)2-Methylnaphthalene 2,000 20,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Acenaphthylene 10,000 40 100,000Acenaphthene NS6,000 60,000Fluorene NS40 400Phenanthrene NS10,000 100,000Anthracene NS30 600Fluoranthene NS200 2,000Pyrene NS20 800C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NS 50,000 100,000C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 50,000 5,000 100,000Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)Benzene 2,000 10,000 100,000Toluene 50,000 40,000 100,000Ethylbenzene 20,000 5,000 100,000Xylenes (mixed Isomers) 9,000 5,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) 50,000 50,000 100,000C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 50,000 100,000C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 7,000 50,000 100,000Sulfate (ug/L)NS NS NSField ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)NS NS NSOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)NS NS NSpHNS NS NSSpec. Cond. (MilliSiemens/cm)NS NS NSTemperature (Celcius)NS NS NSTurbidity (NTU)NS NS NSMethod 1 StandardsUCLsMW-5bailer lowflow low flow bailer12/28/00 1/27/03 10/29/07 12/12/07 1/16/08 4/9/08 8/24/01 1/27/03 7/12/05 6/7/07 10/29/07 4/9/08 3/25/11NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA530 110 NA NA NA NA <5.0 430 16.7 <10 NA <10 <48120 66 NA NA NA NA <5.0 240 6.3 <10 NA <10 <4822 <0.5 NA NA NA NA <5.0 <0.5 <1.0 <10 NA <10 <4866 7 NA NA NA NA <5.0 57 2.07 <10 NA <10 <4876 7.5 NA NA NA NA <5.0 27 3.2 <10 NA <10 <48160 8.8 NA NA NA NA <5.0 97 5.2 <10 NA <10 <4824 <5.0 NA NA NA NA <5.0 10 <1.0 <10 NA <10 <485.1 <5.0 NA NA NA NA <5.0 16 <1.0 <10 NA <10 <4824 <5.0 NA NA NA NA <5.0 26 2.1 <10 NA <10 <4871,000 1,200 NA NA NA NA 400 120,000 3,800 450 NA 1,000 <48031,000 550 NA NA NA NA 1,700 40,000 2,300 230 NA 1,600 1,00069,000 4,200 NA NA NA NA <200 70,000 3,500 370 NA 930 800NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA 13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA 3.81 11.72 0.25 13.76 NA NA NA 0.00 10.89 2.01 0.94NA NA 444 622 520 582 NA NA NA -60 401 150 83NA NA 8.71 2.91 3.27 2.85 NA NA NA 6.42 7.09 6.27 6.59NA NA 99.9 58.6 34.6 18.7 NA NA NA 0.519 22.8 2.17 3.91NA NA 16.1 14.8 12.70 12.13 NA NA NA 14.8 18.8 9.52 6.74NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 390 NA 270 919MW-4MW-6<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardBoxed value indicates concentration exceeds applicable Method 1 Cleanup StandardJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 2Groundwater Analytical Data47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601Sample IDSampling Method GW-2 GW-3Sampling DateMetals (ug/L)Arsenic NS 900 9,000Silver NS7 1,000Barium NS50,000 100,000Beryllium NS50 2,000CadmiumNS450Chromium NS300 3,000Antimony NS8,000 80,000Selenium NS100 1,000Lead NS10 150Nickel NS200 2,000Vanadium NS4,000 40,000Zinc NS900 50,000Iron NSNS NSManganese NSNS NSThallium NS3,000 30,000Mercury NS20 200Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)2-Methylnaphthalene 2,000 20,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Acenaphthylene 10,000 40 100,000Acenaphthene NS6,000 60,000Fluorene NS40 400Phenanthrene NS10,000 100,000Anthracene NS30 600Fluoranthene NS200 2,000Pyrene NS20 800C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NS 50,000 100,000C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 50,000 5,000 100,000Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)Benzene 2,000 10,000 100,000Toluene 50,000 40,000 100,000Ethylbenzene 20,000 5,000 100,000Xylenes (mixed Isomers) 9,000 5,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) 50,000 50,000 100,000C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 50,000 100,000C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 7,000 50,000 100,000Sulfate (ug/L)NS NS NSField ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)NS NS NSOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)NS NS NSpHNS NS NSSpec. Cond. (MilliSiemens/cm)NS NS NSTemperature (Celcius)NS NS NSTurbidity (NTU)NS NS NSMethod 1 StandardsUCLsMW-8bailer6/7/07 10/29/07 4/9/08 9/25/08 3/25/11 1/27/03 7/12/05 10/29/07 3/25/11NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA33 NA <51 150 28 120 3 NA <9.115 NA <51 <100 16 26 <1.0 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 <9.1 <5.0 <1.0 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 <9.1 <5.0 1 NA <9.1<10 NA 66 300 <9.1 <5.0 1.7 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 <9.1 30 5.7 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 <9.1 <5.0 1.4 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 9.7 <5.0 4.7 NA <9.1<10 NA <51 <100 <9.1 <5.0 3.8 NA <9.11,300 NA 21,000 48,000 2,500 11,000 2,700 NA 120450 NA 6,300 14,000 1,300 5,900 2,200 NA 110900 NA 11,000 41,000 1,800 17,000 2,100 NA 140NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.00 7.15 1.54 0.42 0.66 NA NA 5.04 6.46-190 581 -120 -149.8 -70 NA NA 421 756.39 3.16 6.01 6.25 6.21 NA NA 8.07 5.770.298 18.2 1.51 1.017 1.68 NA NA 42.8 2.3815.8 14.2 11.58 14.50 10.13 NA NA 13.7 8.4935 NA 110 16.1 232 NA NA NA 52.3MW-8DMW-7<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardBoxed value indicates concentration exceeds applicable Method 1 Cleanup StandardJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 2Groundwater Analytical Data47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601Sample IDSampling Method GW-2 GW-3Sampling DateMetals (ug/L)Arsenic NS 900 9,000Silver NS7 1,000Barium NS50,000 100,000Beryllium NS50 2,000CadmiumNS450Chromium NS300 3,000Antimony NS8,000 80,000Selenium NS100 1,000Lead NS10 150Nickel NS200 2,000Vanadium NS4,000 40,000Zinc NS900 50,000Iron NSNS NSManganese NSNS NSThallium NS3,000 30,000Mercury NS20 200Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)2-Methylnaphthalene 2,000 20,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Acenaphthylene 10,000 40 100,000Acenaphthene NS6,000 60,000Fluorene NS40 400Phenanthrene NS10,000 100,000Anthracene NS30 600Fluoranthene NS200 2,000Pyrene NS20 800C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NS 50,000 100,000C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 50,000 5,000 100,000Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)Benzene 2,000 10,000 100,000Toluene 50,000 40,000 100,000Ethylbenzene 20,000 5,000 100,000Xylenes (mixed Isomers) 9,000 5,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) 50,000 50,000 100,000C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 50,000 100,000C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 7,000 50,000 100,000Sulfate (ug/L)NS NS NSField ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)NS NS NSOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)NS NS NSpHNS NS NSSpec. Cond. (MilliSiemens/cm)NS NS NSTemperature (Celcius)NS NS NSTurbidity (NTU)NS NS NSMethod 1 StandardsUCLsbailer1/27/03 7/12/05 6/7/07 6/13/07 10/29/07 4/9/08 1/27/03 10/29/07 3/25/11 4/9/08 9/25/08 3/25/11NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA600 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 170 280 21140 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 130 140 13<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 29 <100 10<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 <10 <100 <10<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 51 160 13160 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 27 <100 <10<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 <10 <100 <10<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 <10 <100 <10<5.0 <1.0 NA <11 NA <10 <1.0 NA <10 14 <100 <1062,000 300 NA 130 NA <100 700 NA <100 8,500 16,000 78032,000 300 NA <110 NA <100 500 NA <100 2,900 6,800 33066,000 <200 NA 250 NA <100 600 NA <100 6,600 20,000 1,000NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA 3.86 NA 7.37 10.53 NA 7.63 5.73 5.30 1.14 0.00NA NA 106 NA 367 375 NA 360 225 395 260.7 -111NA NA 6.50 NA 8.50 4.92 NA 8.73 4.66 5.99 5.95 6.49NA NA 1.57 NA 52.9 12.1 NA 63.8 8.58 22.6 17.71 7.21NA NA 17.4 NA 15.6 10.58 NA 16.5 11.14 14.98 18.23 9.46NA NA 550 NA NA 130 NA NA 331 MAX 690 13.5MW-9D MW-10MW-9<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardBoxed value indicates concentration exceeds applicable Method 1 Cleanup StandardJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 2Groundwater Analytical Data47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601Sample IDSampling Method GW-2 GW-3Sampling DateMetals (ug/L)Arsenic NS 900 9,000Silver NS7 1,000Barium NS50,000 100,000Beryllium NS50 2,000CadmiumNS450Chromium NS300 3,000Antimony NS8,000 80,000Selenium NS100 1,000Lead NS10 150Nickel NS200 2,000Vanadium NS4,000 40,000Zinc NS900 50,000Iron NSNS NSManganese NSNS NSThallium NS3,000 30,000Mercury NS20 200Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)2-Methylnaphthalene 2,000 20,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Acenaphthylene 10,000 40 100,000Acenaphthene NS6,000 60,000Fluorene NS40 400Phenanthrene NS10,000 100,000Anthracene NS30 600Fluoranthene NS200 2,000Pyrene NS20 800C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NS 50,000 100,000C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 50,000 5,000 100,000Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ug/L)Benzene 2,000 10,000 100,000Toluene 50,000 40,000 100,000Ethylbenzene 20,000 5,000 100,000Xylenes (mixed Isomers) 9,000 5,000 100,000Naphthalene 1,000 20,000 100,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) 50,000 50,000 100,000C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 50,000 100,000C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 5,000 50,000 100,000C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 7,000 50,000 100,000Sulfate (ug/L)NS NS NSField ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L)NS NS NSOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)NS NS NSpHNS NS NSSpec. Cond. (MilliSiemens/cm)NS NS NSTemperature (Celcius)NS NS NSTurbidity (NTU)NS NS NSMethod 1 StandardsUCLs6/7/07 6/13/07 10/29/07 12/12/07 1/16/08 2/15/08 4/9/08NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <10 NA NA NA NA NANA <100 NA NA NA NA NANA <100 NA NA NA NA NANA 140 NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA 0.2 NA NA NA6.71 NA 1.62 0.00 2.68 8.38 6.6481 NA 394 283 146 277 3286.89 NA 6.74 6.36 6.56 5.74 5.810.402 NA 99.9 4.56 5.92 6.31 6.9617.1 NA 17.9 17.34 15.44 14.44 15.758.75 NA NA NA NA NA NAMW-13<500 - Not detected at the quantitation limit shownNA - Not available or not analyzedNS - No standardBoxed value indicates concentration exceeds applicable Method 1 Cleanup StandardJ:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Soil and GW data (current).xls
TABLE 3Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results47 Center StreetNorthampton, MA RTN 1-13601Sample Identification SG-1 MCP IA-1Sample Type Soil GasMethod 2(1) Indoor AirTypical Indoor Air Concentrations (3)Sample Date 3/25/2011 Standard 3/25/2011 75th Percentile 90th PercentileAir Petroleum Hydrocarbons (µg/m3)C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 9,500 111,000 240 130 330C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 4,300 117,000 42 110 220C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 220 104,000 11 NR 441,3-Butadiene <0.42 - 0.49 NR NRMethyl tert butyl ether <0.68 - <0.38 6.9 39Benzene 12 - 1.1 3.6 11Toluene 14 36,000 1.3 21 54Ethylbenzene6.513,000<0.822.47.4Ethylbenzene6.513,0000.822.47.4Naphthalene 2.2 - 0.97 NR 2.7m/p-Xylene 5.594,000(2)1.0 6.9 21o-Xylene 3.394,000(2)<0.82 2.5 8Results in micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3)(1) Method 2 Soil Gas GC Screening Levels for Evaluating Indoor Air Impacts from MADEP VPH/EPH Final Policy WSC-02-411 (October 31, 2002)(2) Total xylenes(3) DEP's Residential Typical Indoor Air Concentrations Technical Update (December 2008) NR - No ReferenceNote to reader: Compare soil gas result to MCP Method 2 standard and compare indoor air result to typical indoor air concentrations.J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Table 3 Soil gas & indoor air data.xls7/27/2011
TABLE 4Summary of LNAPL, Groundwater Monitoring Data LNAPL Recovery
47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601
Monitoring Well ID Sampling Depth to Depth to LNAPL LNAPL Groundwater
Approx. Gals of
LNAPL
(PVC diameter)Date Water (ft) LNAPL (ft) Thickness (ft) Thickness (in) Elevation (ft) Removed
MW-1 12/28/2000 15.05 14.33 0.72 8.64 84.60 0.00
(2")7/3/2001 15.05 12.30 2.75 33.00 84.60 1.50
el. = 99.65 ft 7/6/2001 15.05 13.84 1.21 14.52 84.60 0.15
8/17/2001 15.05 13.77 1.28 15.36 84.60 0.25
8/24/2001 15.05 14.71 0.34 4.08 84.60 0.19
11/5/2001 15.05 14.01 1.04 12.48 84.60 0.16
1/31/2002 15.05 14.10 0.95 11.40 84.60 0.06
3/12/2002 15.05 14.05 1.00 12.00 84.60 0.10
5/22/2002 12.41 12.14 0.27 3.24 87.24 0.07
7/25/2002 12.37 11.74 0.63 7.56 87.28 0.09
8/26/2002 14.05 13.53 0.52 6.24 85.60 0.18
9/20/2002 15.00 14.24 0.76 9.12 84.65 0.08
10/29/2002 15.07 14.90 0.17 2.04 84.58 0.01
11/18/2002 14.96 ND 0.00 0.00 84.69 0.00
12/23/2002 15.06 14.97 0.09 1.08 84.59 0.01
1/27/2003 14.10 13.90 0.20 2.40 85.55 0.07
3/25/2003 13.29 ND 0.00 0.00 86.36 0.00
4/25/2003 10.92 10.91 0.01 0.12 88.73 0.01
5/19/2003 10.64 10.57 0.07 0.84 89.01 0.07
6/10/2003 10.40 10.35 0.05 0.60 89.25 0.00
7/31/2003 11 18 10 93 025 300 88 47 0077/31/2003 11.18 10.93 0.25 3.00 88.47 0.07
7/27/2004 14.11 13.55 0.56 6.72 85.54 0.07
12/2/2004 14.11 13.55 0.56 6.72 85.54 1.50
7/12/2005 12.39 11.51 0.88 10.56 87.26 0.16
8/31/2005 14.00 13.30 0.70 8.40 85.65 0.75
9/22/2005 15.03 14.15 0.88 10.56 84.62 0.25
9/28/2005 14.91 ND 0.00 0.00 84.74 0.00
11/17/2005 15.11 14.57 0.54 6.48 84.54 0.80
12/23/2005 15.05 14.42 0.63 7.56 84.60 0.37
1/30/2006 11.79 11.59 0.20 2.40 87.86 0.01
4/26/2007 12.53 12.03 0.50 6.00 87.12 0.00
5/30/2007 12.41 11.74 0.67 8.04 87.24 0.50
6/7/2007 12.55 12.41 0.14 1.68 87.10 0.00
10/23/2007 15.33 ND 0.00 0.00 84.32 0.00
10/29/2007 12.39 12.29 0.10 1.20 87.26 0.00
12/12/2007 13.74 13.53 0.21 2.52 85.91 0.15
1/16/2008 11.91 ND 0.00 0.00 87.74 0.00
2/15/2008 10.27 10.24 0.03 0.36 89.38 0.00
4/9/2008 8.86 ND 0.00 0.00 90.79 0.00
9/25/2008 11.02 ND 0.00 0.00 88.63 0.00
3/25/2011 10.51 ND 0.00 0.00 89.14 0.00
MW-1D 1/27/2003 22.90 ND 0.00 0.00 76.98 0.00
(1")7/27/2004 3.31 1.21 2.10 25.20 96.57 0.25
el. = 99.88 ft 12/2/2004 22.60 21.51 1.09 13.08 77.28 0.25
7/12/2005 22.58 21.21 1.37 16.44 77.30 0.12
8/31/2005 22.59 21.49 1.10 13.20 77.29 0.25
9/22/200 22 69 22 0 029 38 9 0069/22/2005 22.69 22.40 0.29 3.48 77.19 0.06
12/23/2005 22.6 21.80 0.83 9.96 77.25 0.93
1/30/2006 10.42 9.59 0.83 9.96 89.46 0.13
4/26/2007 22.93 20.66 2.27 27.24 76.95 0.00
5/30/2007 23.56 20.59 2.97 35.64 76.32 0.08
6/7/2007 19.94 ND 0.00 0.00 79.94 0.00
10/23/2007 21.37 ND 0.00 0.00 78.51 0.00
10/29/2007 13.41 12.75 0.66 7.92 86.47 0.00
12/12/2007 15.93 15.81 0.12 1.44 83.95 0.10
1/16/2008 17.02 16.97 0.05 0.60 82.86 0.00
2/15/2008 13.85 13.74 0.11 1.32 86.03 0.10
4/9/2008 17.23 17.09 0.14 1.68 82.65 0.10
9/25/2008 22.08 ND 0.00 0.00 77.80 0.00
3/25/2011 15.89 15.65 0.24 2.88 83.99 0.10
7/7/2011 7.46 ND 0.00 0.00 92.42 0.00
MW-2 7/3/2001 9.69 ND 0.00 0.00 90.26 0.00
(2")7/6/2001 9.72 ND 0.00 0.00 90.23 0.00
el. = 99.95 ft 8/17/2001 10.57 ND 0.00 0.00 89.38 0.00
8/24/2001 10.80 ND 0.00 0.00 89.15 0.00
11/5/2001 11.19 11.2 0.01 0.12 88.76 0.1
1/31/2002 10.42 ND 0.00 0.00 89.53 0.00
3/12/2002 10.11 ND 0.00 0.00 89.84 0.00
5/22/2002 8.70 ND 0.00 0.00 91.25 0.00
7/25/2002 9.65 ND 0.00 0.00 90.30 0.00
8/26/2002 12.67 ND 0.00 0.00 87.28 0.00
9/20/2002 11.56 ND 0.00 0.00 88.39 0.00
10/29/2002 12.59 ND 0.00 0.00 87.36 0.00
11/18/2002 13.04 ND 0.00 0.00 86.91 0.00
12/23/2002 6.02 ND 0.00 0.00 93.93 0.00
1/27/2003 8.32 ND 0.00 0.00 91.63 0.00
3/25/2003 5.41 ND 0.00 0.00 94.54 0.00
12/2/2004 18.81 18.60 0.21 2.52 81.14 1.00
10/23/2007 12.10 12.10 0.00 0.00 87.85 0.00
1/16/2008 5.28 ND 0.00 0.00 94.67 0.00
2/15/2008 3.45 ND 0.00 0.00 96.50 0.00
4/9/2008 5.17 ND 0.00 0.00 94.78 0.00
9/25/2008 6.63 ND 0.00 0.00 93.32 0.00
3/25/2011 5.35 ND 0.00 0.00 94.60 0.00
J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Graphs Summary of LNAPL GW Gauging Data.xlsx
TABLE 4Summary of LNAPL, Groundwater Monitoring Data LNAPL Recovery
47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601
Monitoring Well ID Sampling Depth to Depth to LNAPL LNAPL Groundwater
Approx. Gals of
LNAPL
(PVC diameter)Date Water (ft) LNAPL (ft) Thickness (ft) Thickness (in) Elevation (ft) Removed
MW-3 12/28/2000 7.18 ND 0.00 0.00 92.51 0.00
(2")7/3/2001 5.49 ND 0.00 0.00 94.20 0.00
el. = 99.69 ft 7/6/2001 5.51 ND 0.00 0.00 94.18 0.00
8/17/2001 5.46 ND 0.00 0.00 94.23 0.00
8/24/2001 5.56 ND 0.00 0.00 94.13 0.00
11/5/2001 5.73 ND 0.00 0.00 93.96 0.00
1/31/2002 5.50 ND 0.00 0.00 94.19 0.00
3/12/2002 5.20 ND 0.00 0.00 94.49 0.00
5/22/2002 5.23 ND 0.00 0.00 94.46 0.00
7/25/2002 5.36 ND 0.00 0.00 94.33 0.00
8/26/2002 5.72 ND 0.00 0.00 93.97 0.00
9/20/2002 5.59 ND 0.00 0.00 94.10 0.00
10/29/2002 5.42 ND 0.00 0.00 94.27 0.00
11/18/2002 4.91 ND 0.00 0.00 94.78 0.00
12/23/2002 4.64 ND 0.00 0.00 95.05 0.00
1/27/2003 5.32 ND 0.00 0.00 94.37 0.001/27/2003 5.32 ND 0.00 0.00 94.37 0.00
3/25/2003 4.55 ND 0.00 0.00 95.14 0.00
7/27/2004 5.48 ND 0.00 0.00 94.21 0.00
12/2/2004 5.11 ND 0.00 0.00 94.58 0.00
7/12/2005 5.20 ND 0.00 0.00 94.49 0.00
8/31/2005 5.40 ND 0.00 0.00 94.29 0.00
9/22/2005 5.53 ND 0.00 0.00 94.16 0.00
9/28/2005 5.49 ND 0.00 0.00 94.20 0.00
11/17/2005 5.26 ND 0.00 0.00 94.43 0.00
12/23/2005 5.18 ND 0.00 0.00 94.51 0.00
1/30/2006 4.84 ND 0.00 0.00 94.85 0.00
4/26/2007 4.71 ND 0.00 0.00 94.98 0.00
5/30/2007 4.90 ND 0.00 0.00 94.79 0.00
6/7/2007 4.78 ND 0.00 0.00 94.91 0.00
12/12/2007 4.55 ND 0.00 0.00 95.14 0.00
1/16/2008 4.30 ND 0.00 0.00 95.39 0.00
4/9/2008 3.68 ND 0.00 0.00 96.01 0.00
9/25/2008 4.55 ND 0.00 0.00 95.14 0.00
3/25/2011 3.55 ND 0.00 0.00 96.14 0.00
MW-4 12/28/2000 12.62 ND 0.00 0.00 87.05 0.00
(2")7/3/2001 7.46 7.22 0.24 2.88 92.21 0.10
el. = 99.67 ft 7/6/2001 8.23 7.98 0.25 3.00 91.44 0.10
8/17/2001 11.30 10.88 0.42 5.04 88.37 0.25
8/24/2001 12.43 12.17 0.26 3.12 87.24 1.00
11/5/2001 12.65 12.49 0.16 1.92 87.02 0.10
1/31/2002 8.56 ND 0.00 0.00 91.11 0.00
3/12/2002 784 783 001 012 91 83 0003/12/2002 7.84 7.83 0.01 0.12 91.83 0.00
5/22/2002 5.19 ND 0.00 0.00 94.48 0.00
7/25/2002 10.36 10.31 0.05 0.60 89.31 0.00
8/26/2002 11.85 11.64 0.21 2.52 87.82 0.01
9/20/2002 8.61 ND 0.00 0.00 91.06 0.00
10/29/2002 5.83 ND 0.00 0.00 93.84 0.00
11/19/2002 6.27 ND 0.00 0.00 93.40 0.00
12/23/2002 4.81 ND 0.00 0.00 94.86 0.00
1/27/2002 8.75 ND 0.00 0.00 90.92 0.00
3/25/2003 7.59 ND 0.00 0.00 92.08 0.00
4/25/2003 6.49 ND 0.00 0.00 93.18 0.00
5/19/2003 6.39 ND 0.00 0.00 93.28 0.00
6/10/2003 7.92 ND 0.00 0.00 91.75 0.00
7/31/2003 8.93 ND 0.00 0.00 90.74 0.00
7/27/2004 11.75 11.69 0.06 0.72 87.92 0.01
12/2/2004 13.08 12.78 0.30 3.60 86.59 0.50
7/12/2005 11.02 10.92 0.10 1.20 88.65 0.00
9/22/2005 12.46 12.45 0.01 0.12 87.21 0.00
9/28/2005 12.99 12.68 0.31 3.72 86.68 0.25
12/23/2005 11.37 11.14 0.23 2.76 88.30 0.09
1/30/2006 4.66 ND 0.00 0.00 95.01 0.00
4/26/2007 8.30 8.20 0.10 1.20 91.37 0.00
5/30/2007 10.47 10.21 0.26 3.12 89.20 0.04
6/7/2007 10.87 10.70 0.17 2.04 88.80 0.00
10/23/2007 13.30 13.30 0.00 0.00 86.37 0.00
12/12/2007 10.15 10.10 0.05 0.60 89.52 0.10
1/16/2008 7.57 ND 0.00 0.00 92.10 0.00
4/9/2008 8.18 ND 0.00 0.00 91.49 0.004/9/2008 8.18 ND 0.00 0.00 91.49 0.00
9/25/2008 10.25 10.14 0.11 1.32 89.42 0.10
3/25/2011 Well destroyed/not found/paved over
MW-5 8/24/2001 19.52 ND 0.00 0.00 80.28 0.00
11/5/2001 9.07 9.06 0.01 0.12 90.73 0.00
el. = 99.80 ft 1/31/2002 8.51 ND 0.00 0.00 91.29 0.00
3/12/2002 7.75 ND 0.00 0.00 92.05 0.00
J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Graphs Summary of LNAPL GW Gauging Data.xlsx
TABLE 4Summary of LNAPL, Groundwater Monitoring Data LNAPL Recovery
47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601
Monitoring Well ID Sampling Depth to Depth to LNAPL LNAPL Groundwater
Approx. Gals of
LNAPL
(PVC diameter)Date Water (ft) LNAPL (ft) Thickness (ft) Thickness (in) Elevation (ft) Removed
MW-6 11/5/2001 20.20 ND 0.00 0.00 79.36 0.00
(2")1/31/2002 19.28 19.20 0.08 0.96 80.28 0.10
el. = 99.56 ft 3/12/2002 16.14 16.00 0.14 1.68 83.42 0.01
5/22/2002 14.30 14.25 0.05 0.60 85.26 0.00
7/25/2002 15.97 15.51 0.46 5.52 83.59 0.02
8/26/2002 17.73 17.22 0.51 6.12 81.83 0.01
9/20/2002 18.62 18.11 0.51 6.12 80.94 0.04
10/29/2002 18.02 17.94 0.08 0.96 81.54 0.02
11/18/2002 16.47 ND 0.00 0.00 83.09 0.00
12/23/2002 14.53 14.42 0.11 1.32 85.03 0.01
1/27/2003 13.75 ND 0.00 0.00 85.81 0.00
3/25/2003 10.22 ND 0.00 0.00 89.34 0.00
4/25/2003 9.65 9.64 0.01 0.12 89.91 0.01
5/19/2003 11.24 ND 0.00 0.00 88.32 0.00
6/10/2003 7.48 ND 0.00 0.00 92.08 0.00
7/31/2003 11.43 11.34 0.09 1.08 88.13 0.01
7/27/2004 12.95 ND 0.00 0.00 86.61 0.00
12/2/2004 4.53 ND 0.00 0.00 95.03 0.00
7/12/2005 10.35 ND 0.00 0.00 89.21 0.00
8/31/2005 10.40 ND 0.00 0.00 89.16 0.00
9/22/2005 15.72 ND 0.00 0.00 83.84 0.00
9/28/2005 15.44 ND 0.00 0.00 84.12 0.00
11/17/2005 1.41 ND 0.00 0.00 98.15 0.0011/17/2005 1.41 ND 0.00 0.00 98.15 0.00
12/23/2005 11.75 ND 0.00 0.00 87.81 0.00
1/30/2006 7.19 ND 0.00 0.00 92.37 0.00
4/26/2007 10.34 10.33 0.01 0.12 89.22 0.00
5/30/2007 14.69 ND 0.00 0.00 84.87 0.00
6/7/2007 8.00 ND 0.00 0.00 91.56 0.00
12/12/2007 1.70 ND 0.00 0.00 97.86 0.00
1/16/2008 8.62 ND 0.00 0.00 90.94 0.00
2/15/2008 5.16 ND 0.00 0.00 94.40 0.00
4/9/2008 10.68 ND 0.00 0.00 88.88 0.00
9/25/2008 12.93 ND 0.00 0.00 86.63 0.00
3/25/2011 5.07 ND 0.00 0.00 94.49 0.00
MW-7 11/5/2001 18.78 18.36 0.42 5.04 80.96 0.00
(2")1/31/2002 16.79 16.52 0.27 3.24 82.95 0.01
el. = 99.74 ft 3/12/2002 13.34 13.21 0.13 1.56 86.40 0.00
5/22/2002 10.58 ND 0.00 0.00 89.16 0.00
7/25/2002 12.57 12.31 0.26 3.12 87.17 0.01
8/26/2002 16.07 15.50 0.57 6.84 83.67 0.03
9/20/2002 14.90 14.48 0.42 5.04 84.84 0.02
10/29/2002 12.66 12.65 0.01 0.12 87.08 0.02
11/18/2002 14.75 14.46 0.29 3.48 84.99 0.02
12/23/2002 9.63 9.52 0.11 1.32 90.11 0.01
1/27/2003 14.01 13.65 0.36 4.32 85.73 0.01
3/25/2003 6.35 6.18 0.17 2.04 93.39 0.01
4/25/2003 9.61 ND 0.00 0.00 90.13 0.00
5/19/2003 11.15 11.08 0.07 0.84 88.59 0.01
6/10/2003 9.60 9.54 0.06 0.72 90.14 0.016/10/2003 9.60 9.54 0.06 0.72 90.14 0.01
7/27/2004 11.55 ND 0.00 0.00 88.19 0.00
12/2/2004 9.61 9.58 0.03 0.36 90.13 2.00
7/12/2005 11.83 11.79 0.04 0.48 87.91 0.00
8/31/2005 14.60 14.49 0.11 1.32 85.14 0.00
9/22/2005 16.60 16.33 0.27 3.24 83.14 0.50
9/28/2005 11.39 11.21 0.18 2.16 88.35 0.25
11/17/2005 13.58 13.53 0.05 0.60 86.16 0.20
12/23/2005 13.89 13.62 0.27 3.24 85.85 0.01
1/30/2006 4.32 ND 0.00 0.00 95.42 0.00
4/26/2007 6.12 6.06 0.06 0.72 93.62 0.00
5/30/2007 13.33 13.23 0.10 1.20 86.41 0.00
6/7/2007 10.08 10.06 0.02 0.24 89.66 0.00
12/12/2007 10.88 10.87 0.01 0.12 88.86 0.00
4/9/2008 9.18 8.94 0.24 2.88 90.56 0.10
9/25/2008 12.83 ND 0.00 0.00 86.91 0.00
3/25/2011 7.91 ND 0.00 0.00 91.83 0.00
MW-8 1/27/2003 12.78 ND 0.00 0.00 86.96 0.00
4/25/2003 16.31 ND 0.00 0.00 83.43 0.00
el. = 99.74 ft 5/19/2003 19.96 ND 0.00 0.00 79.78 0.00
6/10/2003 14.97 ND 0.00 0.00 84.77 0.00
7/31/2003 17.66 ND 0.00 0.00 82.08 0.00
MW-8D 1/27/2003 19.91 ND 0.00 0.00 79.83 0.00
(2")3/25/2003 6.26 ND 0.00 0.00 93.48 0.00
el. = 99.74 ft 7/27/2004 19.87 ND 0.00 0.00 79.87 0.00
12/2/2004 19 14 ND 000 000 80 60 00012/2/2004 19.14 ND 0.00 0.00 80.60 0.00
7/12/2005 18.67 ND 0.00 0.00 81.07 0.00
8/31/2005 22.03 ND 0.00 0.00 77.71 0.00
9/22/2005 22.80 ND 0.00 0.00 76.94 0.00
11/17/2005 18.64 ND 0.00 0.00 81.10 0.00
12/23/2005 18.28 ND 0.00 0.00 81.46 0.00
1/30/2006 13.32 ND 0.00 0.00 86.42 0.00
4/26/2007 15.52 ND 0.00 0.00 84.22 0.00
5/30/2007 18.64 ND 0.00 0.00 81.10 0.00
6/7/2007 17.81 ND 0.00 0.00 81.93 0.00
12/12/2007 17.87 ND 0.00 0.00 81.87 0.00
2/15/2008 2.83 ND 0.00 0.00 96.91 0.10
4/9/2008 6.18 ND 0.00 0.00 93.56 0.00
9/25/2008 17.96 ND 0.00 0.00 81.78 0.00
3/25/2011 5.95 ND 0.00 0.00 93.79 0.00
J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Graphs Summary of LNAPL GW Gauging Data.xlsx
TABLE 4Summary of LNAPL, Groundwater Monitoring Data LNAPL Recovery
47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601
Monitoring Well ID Sampling Depth to Depth to LNAPL LNAPL Groundwater
Approx. Gals of
LNAPL
(PVC diameter)Date Water (ft) LNAPL (ft) Thickness (ft) Thickness (in) Elevation (ft) Removed
MW-9 1/27/2003 14.35 ND 0.00 0.00 85.54 0.00
(1")3/25/2003 11.17 ND 0.00 0.00 88.72 0.00
el. = 99.89 ft 4/25/2003 11.41 ND 0.00 0.00 88.48 0.00
5/19/2003 11.95 ND 0.00 0.00 87.94 0.00
6/10/2003 11.54 ND 0.00 0.00 88.35 0.00
7/31/2003 12.41 ND 0.00 0.00 87.48 0.00
7/27/2004 15.76 ND 0.00 0.00 84.13 0.00
12/2/2004 8.60 ND 0.00 0.00 91.29 0.00
7/12/2005 11.19 ND 0.00 0.00 88.70 0.00
8/31/2005 12.09 ND 0.00 0.00 87.80 0.00
9/22/2005 14.95 ND 0.00 0.00 84.94 0.00
9/28/2005 11.32 ND 0.00 0.00 88.57 0.00
11/17/2005 7.71 ND 0.00 0.00 92.18 0.00
12/23/2005 12.79 ND 0.00 0.00 87.10 0.00
1/30/2006 6.59 ND 0.00 0.00 93.30 0.00
4/26/2007 6.56 ND 0.00 0.00 93.33 0.00
5/30/2007 12.86 ND 0.00 0.00 87.03 0.00
6/7/2007 9.99 ND 0.00 0.00 89.90 0.00
12/12/2007 12.40 ND 0.00 0.00 87.49 0.00
1/16/2008 9.66 ND 0.00 0.00 90.23 0.00//
2/15/2008 9.06 ND 0.00 0.00 90.83 0.00
4/9/2008 7.01 ND 0.00 0.00 92.88 0.00
9/25/2008 12.42 ND 0.00 0.00 87.47 0.00
MW-9D 1/27/2003 22.80 ND 0.00 0.00 77.12 0.00
(1")3/25/2003 18.37 ND 0.00 0.00 81.55 0.00
el. = 99.92 ft 7/27/2004 21.25 ND 0.00 0.00 78.67 0.00
12/2/2004 19.71 ND 0.00 0.00 80.21 0.00
7/12/2005 19.61 ND 0.00 0.00 80.31 0.00
8/31/2005 20.85 ND 0.00 0.00 79.07 0.00
9/22/2005 23.63 ND 0.00 0.00 76.29 0.00
9/28/2005 20.74 ND 0.00 0.00 79.18 0.00
11/17/2005 15.28 ND 0.00 0.00 84.64 0.00
12/23/2005 19.80 ND 0.00 0.00 80.12 0.00
1/30/2006 15.94 ND 0.00 0.00 83.98 0.00
4/26/2007 16.93 ND 0.00 0.00 82.99 0.00
5/30/2007 20.36 ND 0.00 0.00 79.56 0.00
6/7/2007 19.52 ND 0.00 0.00 80.40 0.00
12/12/2007 13.23 ND 0.00 0.00 86.69 0.00
1/16/2008 11.14 ND 0.00 0.00 88.78 0.00
2/15/2008 8.10 ND 0.00 0.00 91.82 0.00
4/9/2008 11.04 ND 0.00 0.00 88.88 0.00
9/25/2008 20.15 ND 0.00 0.00 79.77 0.00
3/25/2011 12.59 ND 0.00 0.00 87.33 0.00
MW-10 1/27/2003 1.50 1.01 0.49 5.88 91.52 0.00
(1")5/19/2003 0.75 0.58 0.17 2.04 92.27 0.01(1 )5/19/2003 0.75 0.58 0.17 2.04 92.27 0.01
el. = 93.02 ft 7/27/2004 3.31 1.21 2.10 25.20 89.71 0.75
7/12/2005 4.20 1.05 3.15 37.80 88.82 0.23
9/28/2005 1.51 1.50 0.01 0.12 91.51 0.00
11/17/2005 1.83 0.98 0.85 10.20 91.19 0.68
12/23/2005 1.43 1.05 0.38 4.56 91.59 0.01
5/30/2007 0.31 0.15 0.16 1.92 92.71 0.01
6/7/2007 0.40 ND 0.00 0.00 92.62 0.00
12/12/2007 0.80 ND 0.00 0.00 92.22 0.00
1/16/2008 0.31 0.25 0.06 0.72 92.71 0.00
2/15/2008 0.60 0.50 0.10 1.20 92.42 0.05
4/9/2008 0.33 ND 0.00 0.00 92.69 0.00
9/25/2008 0.71 0.59 0.12 1.44 92.31 0.10
3/25/2011 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.52 0.00
7/7/2011 0.84 0.80 0.04 0.48 92.18 0.00
MW-11 6/7/2007 0.40 ND 0.00 0.00 92.62 0.00
(1")12/12/2007 4.50 ND 0.00 0.00 88.52 0.00
el. = 93.02 ft 1/16/2008 1.56 1.34 0.22 2.64 91.46 0.00
2/15/2008 3.53 3.50 0.03 0.36 89.49 0.05
4/9/2008 2.15 1.97 0.18 2.16 90.87 0.05
9/25/2008 7.35 6.79 0.56 6.72 85.67 0.20
3/25/2011 UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK 0.40
7/7/2011 6.40 6.38 0.02 0.24 86.62 0.00
MW-12 6/7/2007 ND ND 0.00 0.00 0.00
(1")12/12/2007 DRY - Not Measured
el = 93 02 ft 2/15/2008 DRY - Not Measuredel. = 93.02 ft 2/15/2008 DRY - Not Measured
4/9/2008 DRY - Not Measured
9/25/2008 DRY - Not Measured
3/25/2011 DRY - Not Measured
MW-13 6/7/2007 18.86 ND 0.00 0.00 74.16 0.00
(2")12/12/2007 13.84 ND 0.00 0.00 79.18 0.00
el. = 93.02 ft 1/16/2008 11.94 ND 0.00 0.00 81.08 0.00
2/15/2008 11.77 ND 0.00 0.00 81.25 0.00
4/9/2008 11.01 ND 0.00 0.00 82.01 0.00
9/25/2008 12.32 ND 0.00 0.00 80.70 0.00
3/25/2011 12.13 ND 0.00 0.00 80.89 0.00
J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Graphs Summary of LNAPL GW Gauging Data.xlsx
TABLE 4Summary of LNAPL, Groundwater Monitoring Data LNAPL Recovery
47 Center Street, Northampton, MARTN 1-13601
Approx Gals of Monitoring Well ID Sampling Depth to Depth to LNAPL LNAPL Groundwater
Approx. Gals of
LNAPL
(PVC diameter)Date Water (ft) LNAPL (ft) Thickness (ft) Thickness (in) Elevation (ft) Removed
EW-1 8/24/2001 20.10 20.00 0.10 1.20 79.71 0.00
(4")11/5/2001 11.71 ND 0.00 0.00 88.10 0.00
el. = 99.81 ft 1/31/2002 10.08 ND 0.00 0.00 89.73 0.00
3/12/2002 9.10 ND 0.00 0.00 90.71 0.00
5/22/2002 7.46 ND 0.00 0.00 92.35 0.00
7/25/2002 13.30 ND 0.00 0.00 86.51 0.00
8/26/2002 17.32 17.17 0.15 1.80 82.49 0.01
9/20/2002 19.35 19.05 0.30 3.60 80.46 0.05
10/29/2002 18.61 18.30 0.31 3.72 81.20 0.05
11/18/2002 12.56 ND 0.00 0.00 87.25 0.00
12/23/2002 6.86 ND 0.00 0.00 92.95 0.00
1/27/2003 13.21 ND 0.00 0.00 86.60 0.00
7/27/2004 18.92 18.53 0.39 4.68 80.89 0.50
7/12/2005 9.18 ND 0.00 0.00 90.63 0.00
8/31/2005 14.30 ND 0.00 0.00 85.51 0.00
9/22/2005 15.90 15.74 0.16 1.92 83.91 1.00
9/28/2005 14.49 ND 0.00 0.00 85.32 0.00
11/17/2005 11.41 ND 0.00 0.00 88.40 0.00
12/23/2005 8.19 ND 0.00 0.00 91.62 0.00
1/30/2006 4.39 ND 0.00 0.00 95.42 0.00
4/26/2007 8.83 ND 0.00 0.00 90.98 0.00
5/30/2007 13.91 ND 0.00 0.00 85.90 0.00
6/7/2007 11.80 ND 0.00 0.00 88.01 0.00
10/23/2007 18 96 18 88 008 096 80 85 00010/23/2007 18.96 18.88 0.08 0.96 80.85 0.00
12/12/2007 10.50 ND 0.00 0.00 89.31 0.00
1/16/2008 5.36 ND 0.00 0.00 94.45 0.00
4/9/2008 4.99 ND 0.00 0.00 94.82 0.00
9/25/2008 12.31 ND 0.00 0.00 87.50 0.00
3/25/2011 6.56 ND 0.00 0.00 93.25 0.00
Average NAPL Thickness: 0.59
Total LNAPL
Removed 21.55 Gallons
Notes:
NA is not available / not applicable
ND is not detected
Horizontal line indicates timeframe that chemical injections occurred.
Shaded areas represent LNAPL thickness greater than 1/2-inch following chemical injections.
Average NAPL thickness based on 2008 to current gauging data from wells that historically contained measurable NAPL, including MW-3 as well is located within source area.
J:\N\N0633\N0633\DATA\Graphs Summary of LNAPL GW Gauging Data.xlsx
Resident - Soil: Table RS-1ShortForm Version 4-06Exposure Point Concentration (EPC)Vlookup Version v0808Based on Resident Ages 1-31 (Cancer), 1-8 (Chronic Noncancer), and 1-2 (Subchronic Noncancer)ELCR (all chemicals) =Chronic HI (all chemicals) =3E-01**Do not insert or delete any rows**Subchronic HI (all chemicals) =8E-02Click on empty cell below and select OHM using arrow.Oil or EPC Chronic SubchronicHazardous Material (mg/kg)ELCRingestionELCRdermalELCRvegetableELCRtotalHQingHQdermHQvegetableHQtotalHQingHQdermHQvegetableHQtotalAliphatics C9 to C18 3.9E+02 9.5E-03 4.0E-02 5.0E-02 2.6E-03 7.6E-03 1.0E-02Aliphatics C19 to C36 1.5E+02 1.8E-04 1.5E-04 3.4E-04 1.7E-04 9.8E-05 2.6E-04Aromatics C11 to C22 2.5E+02 7.4E-03 1.7E-02 2.5E-02 2.0E-03 3.3E-03 5.3E-03Aliphatics C5 to C8 2.6E+01 1.6E-03 1.3E-02 1.5E-02 4.3E-04 2.5E-03 3.0E-03Aliphatics C9 to C12 1.0E+02 2.4E-03 1.0E-02 1.3E-02 6.7E-04 2.0E-03 2.6E-03Aromatics C9 to C10 1.2E+02 9.7E-03 4.1E-02 5.1E-02 2.7E-03 7.8E-03 1.0E-02Naphthalene 4.5E+02 2.0E-02 4.6E-02 6.6E-02 5.4E-03 8.8E-03 1.4E-02Methylnaphthalene, 2- 7.1E-01 1.5E-04 3.7E-04 5.2E-04 4.3E-04 6.9E-04 1.1E-03Phenanthrene 5.8E-01 1.7E-05 4.0E-05 5.7E-05 4.6E-06 7.5E-06 1.2E-05Fluoranthene 4.9E-01 1.1E-05 2.5E-05 3.6E-05 2.9E-06 4.8E-06 7.7E-06Pyrene 1.0E+03 2.9E-02 6.9E-02 9.8E-02 8.0E-03 1.3E-02 2.1E-02Ethylbenzene 1.9E+02 4.6E-03 7.8E-03 1.2E-02 1.3E-03 1.5E-03 2.7E-03Xylenes (mixed isomers) 1.9E+02 2.3E-03 2.4E-03 4.7E-03 6.3E-03 4.4E-03 1.1E-021 of 1Sheet: EPCs
Page 1 of 16
Page 2 of 16
Page 3 of 16
Page 4 of 16
Page 5 of 16
Page 6 of 16
Page 7 of 16
Page 8 of 16
Page 9 of 16
Page 10 of 16
Page 11 of 16
Page 12 of 16
Page 13 of 16
Air Sampling Media Certificate of Analysis
Date Analyzed:2/25/2011 Batch #:11B0072
Certification Type:Batch Certified Individual Certified
Media Type:Summa Canister Flow Controllers
Media IDs:BC1838
Note:Two ID's grouped together, for example BC2136/BC3145, represents matched pairs of certified summa
canisters and flow controllers.
Units:PPBv Ug/M3
<0.19 1,3-Butadiene <0.41 1,3-Butadiene
<0.19 Methyl tert-butyl Ether <0.68 Methyl tert-butyl Ether
<0.19 Benzene <0.60 Benzene
<0.19 Toluene <0.71 Toluene
<0.19 Ethylbenzene <0.81 Ethylbenzene
<0.19 m,p-Xylenes <0.81 m,p-Xylenes
<0.19 o-Xylene <0.81 o-Xylene
<0.17 Naphthalene <0.87 Naphthalene
<8.5 C5 - C8 Aliphatic Range
<13.3 C9 - C12 Aliphatic Range
<9.6 C9 - C10 Aromatic Range
Special Notes:
Analyst Initials/Date:TPH 3/30/11
Page 14 of 16
Air Sampling Media Certificate of Analysis
Date Analyzed:3/8/2011 Batch #:11B0089
Certification Type:Batch Certified Individual Certified
Media Type:Summa Canister Flow Controllers
Media IDs:BC1724
Note:Two ID's grouped together, for example BC2136/BC3145, represents matched pairs of certified summa
canisters and flow controllers.
Units:PPBv Ug/M3
<0.19 1,3-Butadiene <0.41 1,3-Butadiene
<0.19 Methyl tert-butyl Ether <0.68 Methyl tert-butyl Ether
<0.19 Benzene <0.60 Benzene
<0.19 Toluene <0.71 Toluene
<0.19 Ethylbenzene <0.81 Ethylbenzene
<0.19 m,p-Xylenes <0.81 m,p-Xylenes
<0.19 o-Xylene <0.81 o-Xylene
<0.17 Naphthalene <0.87 Naphthalene
<8.5 C5 - C8 Aliphatic Range
<13.3 C9 - C12 Aliphatic Range
<9.6 C9 - C10 Aromatic Range
Special Notes:
Analyst Initials/Date:TPH 3/30/11
Page 15 of 16
Page 16 of 16
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Westfield
Westfield Executive Park
53 Southampton Road
Westfield, MA 01085
Tel:(413)572-4000
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1
Client Project/Site: N-0633
For:
Tighe & Bond
53 Southampton Road
Westfield, Massachusetts 01085
Attn: Mr. Jason M Perry
Authorized for release by:
04/08/2011 11:45:36 AM
Joe Chimi
Report Production Representative
joe.chimi@testamericainc.com
Designee for
Lisa Worthington
Project Manager II
lisa.worthington@testamericainc.com
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC requirements for accredited parameters,
exceptions are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAC, this report may not be reproduced
except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact
the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature
is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Page 1 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table of Contents
Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1
Page 2 of 23
TestAmerica Westfield
04/08/2011
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Sample Receipt Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Project #:
RTN:
Matrices:Groundwater/Surface Water Soil/Sediment Drinking Water Air
7470/7471 Hg Mass DEP VPH 8081 Pesticides 7196 Hex Cr
CAM III B CAM IV A CAM V B CAM VI B
7010 Metals Mass DEP EPH 8151 Herbicides 8330 Explosives
CAM III C CAM IV B CAM V C CAM VIII A
6020 Metals 8082 PCB
9014 Total
Cyanide/PAC 332.0 Perchlorate
CAM III D CAM V A CAM VI A CAM VIII B
A
Yes No
B Yes No
C Yes No
D
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
F Yes No
G Yes No1
H Yes No
I Yes No
Signature:Position:
Printed Name:Date:
This form has been electronically signed and approved
TO-15 VOC
CAM Protocols (check all that apply below):
360-32914-(1-7)
Were all samples received in a condition consistent with those described on the Chain-of-Custody,
properly preserved (including temperature) in the field or laboratory, and prepared/analyzed within
method holding time.
8270 SVOC
8260 VOC
CAM II A
Mass DEP APH
Affirmative Responses to Questions A through F are required for "Presumptive Certainty" status
is accurate and complete.
Were the reporting limits at or below all CAM reporting limits specified in the selected CAM
protocol(s)?
Were results reported for the complete analyte list specified in the selected CAM protocol(s) ?
Were the analytical method(s) and all associated QC requirements specified in the selected CAM
protocol(s) followed?
Steven C. Hartmann 4/8/11 11:45
MassDEP Analytical Protocol Certification Form
I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for
obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
Data User Note: Data that achieve "Presumptive Certainty" status may not necessarily meet the data usability and
representativeness requirements described in 310 CMR 40. 1056 (2)(k) and WCS-07-350
CAM IX B
Other:
47 Center St., Northampton MA
Laboratory Director
CAM III A
CAM II B
6010 Metals
Does the laboratory report comply with all the reporting requirements specified in CAM VII A,
"Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical
Data"?
b. APH and TO-15 Methods only: Was the complete analyte list reported for each method?
E
Were all required corrective actions and analytical response actions specified in the selected CAM
protocol(s) implemented for all identified performance standard non-conformances?
a. VPH, EPH and APH Methods only: Was each method conducted without significant
modification(s)? (Refer to the individual method(s) for a list of significant modifications).
Were all applicable CAM protocol QC and performance standard non-conformances identified and
evaluated in a laboratory narrative (including all "No" responses to Questions A through E)?
TestAmerica Westfield
CAM IX A
This form provides certifications for the following data set: list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s):
Project Location:
Were all QC performance standards specified in the CAM protocol(s) achieved?
1 All negative responses must be addressed in an attached laboratory narrative.
Responses to Questions G, H and I below are required for "Presumptive Certainty" status
Laboratory Name:360-32914-1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 3 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case Narrative
Client: Tighe & Bond TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1
Project/Site: N-0633
Job ID: 360-32914-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Westfield
Narrative
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 03/28/2011; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the
coolers at receipt was 6.0 C.
Note: All samples which require thermal preservation are considered acceptable if the arrival temperature is within 2 C of the required
temperature or method specified range. For samples with a specified temperature of 4 C, samples with a temperature ranging from just
above freezing temperature of water to 6 C shall be acceptable. Samples that are hand delivered immediately following collection may not
meet these criteria, however they will be deemed acceptable according to NELAC standards, if there is evidence that the chilling process
has begun, such as arrival on ice, etc.
TestAmerica’s Reporting Limits (RLs) for this report do not meet WSC-CAM-III method reporting limits due to various reasons such as
methodology, dilutions or moisture content (soils). TestAmerica’s MA pivot table EDD documents which compound(s) exceed certain
regulatory standards. If not included with your deliverables, please contact your Project Manager about the availability of this EDD for your
report.
EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Samples EW-1 (360-32914-1), MW-6 (360-32914-2), MW-7 (360-32914-3), MW-8D (360-32914-4), MW-10 (360-32914-5), MW-9D
(360-32914-6) and MW-9D (FILTERED) (360-32914-7) were analyzed for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons in accordance with MA DEP
MA-EPH. The samples were prepared on 04/06/2011 and analyzed on 04/07/2011.
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, n-Hexatriacontane and Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene failed the criteria low for the closing CCV.
The samples submitted for MA DEP EPH analysis were received with sufficient preservation (pH <2).
According to EPH method reference 11.2.6.2, using GC/MS, the laboratory has identified a single component contaminant that appears at
the same retention time in all laboratory and field samples. This contaminant is derived from the method's SPE cartridge and is not
included in the calculation of the C11-C22 Aromatics range.
No other difficulties were encountered during the EPH analyses.
All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 4 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Detection Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Client Sample ID: EW-1 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-1
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Method Prep TypeDDil Fac
C19-C36 Aliphatics 100
RL
100 ug/L MA-EPH Total/NA1
RL
C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA130100ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA130100ug/L 1
Total EPH MA-EPH Total/NA230100ug/L 1
Client Sample ID: MW-6 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-2
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Method Prep TypeDDil Fac
C19-C36 Aliphatics 1000
RL
480 ug/L MA-EPH Total/NA1
RL
C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA800480ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA800480ug/L 1
Total EPH MA-EPH Total/NA1800480ug/L 1
Client Sample ID: MW-7 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-3
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Method Prep TypeDDil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 2500
RL
91 ug/L MA-EPH Total/NA1
RL
C19-C36 Aliphatics MA-EPH Total/NA130091ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA180091ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA190091ug/L 1
Total EPH MA-EPH Total/NA560091ug/L 1
Fluoranthene MA-EPH Total/NA9.7 9.1 ug/L 1
2-Methylnaphthalene MA-EPH Total/NA289.1 ug/L 1
Naphthalene MA-EPH Total/NA169.1 ug/L 1
Client Sample ID: MW-8D Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-4
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Method Prep TypeDDil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 120
RL
91 ug/L MA-EPH Total/NA1
RL
C19-C36 Aliphatics MA-EPH Total/NA11091ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA14091ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA14091ug/L 1
Total EPH MA-EPH Total/NA37091ug/L 1
Client Sample ID: MW-10 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-5
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Method Prep TypeDDil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 780
RL
100 ug/L MA-EPH Total/NA1
RL
C19-C36 Aliphatics MA-EPH Total/NA330100ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA1000100ug/L 1
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)MA-EPH Total/NA1100100ug/L 1
Total EPH MA-EPH Total/NA2100100ug/L 1
Acenaphthylene MA-EPH Total/NA1010ug/L 1
Fluorene MA-EPH Total/NA1310ug/L 1
2-Methylnaphthalene MA-EPH Total/NA2110ug/L 1
Naphthalene MA-EPH Total/NA1310ug/L 1
Client Sample ID: MW-9D Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-6
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: MW-9D (FILTERED)Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-7
No Detections.
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 5 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Method Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
MA DEPMA-EPH Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)TAL WFD
Protocol References:
MA DEP = Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection
Laboratory References:
TAL WFD = TestAmerica Westfield, Westfield Executive Park, 53 Southampton Road, Westfield, MA 01085, TEL (413)572-4000
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 6 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sample Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
360-32914-1 EW-1 Water 03/25/11 12:25 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-2 MW-6 Water 03/25/11 13:10 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-3 MW-7 Water 03/25/11 14:50 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-4 MW-8D Water 03/25/11 15:35 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-5 MW-10 Water 03/25/11 16:45 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-6 MW-9D Water 03/25/11 13:55 03/28/11 09:50
360-32914-7 MW-9D (FILTERED)Water 03/25/11 13:55 03/28/11 09:50
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 7 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Analytical Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-1Client Sample ID: EW-1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 12:25
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1
Analyte
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1C19-C36 Aliphatics 100
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)130
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)130
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Total EPH 230
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1AcenaphtheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1AcenaphthyleneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1AnthraceneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1ChryseneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1FluorantheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1FluoreneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 12-Methylnaphthalene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1NaphthaleneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1PhenanthreneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 94 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 91 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 140-140
o-Terphenyl 73 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 81 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 15:37 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-2Client Sample ID: MW-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:10
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics ND 480 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1
Analyte
480 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1C19-C36 Aliphatics 1000
480 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)800
480 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)800
480 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Total EPH 1800
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1AcenaphtheneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1AcenaphthyleneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1AnthraceneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1ChryseneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1FluorantheneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1FluoreneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 8 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Analytical Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-2Client Sample ID: MW-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:10
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
2-Methylnaphthalene ND 48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1
Analyte
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1NaphthaleneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1PhenanthreneND
48 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 113 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 110 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 140-140
o-Terphenyl 86 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 73 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:11 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-3Client Sample ID: MW-7
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 14:50
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 2500 91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1
Analyte
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1C19-C36 Aliphatics 1300
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)1800
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)1900
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Total EPH 5600
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1AcenaphtheneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1AcenaphthyleneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1AnthraceneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1ChryseneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Fluoranthene9.7
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1FluoreneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 12-Methylnaphthalene 28
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1Naphthalene16
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1PhenanthreneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 114 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 112 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 140-140
o-Terphenyl 84 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 68 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 16:45 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-4Client Sample ID: MW-8D
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 15:35
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 120 91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1
Analyte
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1C19-C36 Aliphatics 110
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)140
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 9 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Analytical Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-4Client Sample ID: MW-8D
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 15:35
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)140 91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1
Analyte
91 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Total EPH 370
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1AcenaphtheneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1AcenaphthyleneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1AnthraceneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1ChryseneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1FluorantheneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1FluoreneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 12-Methylnaphthalene ND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1NaphthaleneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1PhenanthreneND
9.1 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 109 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 106 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 140-140
o-Terphenyl 83 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 62 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:19 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-5Client Sample ID: MW-10
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 16:45
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics 780 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1
Analyte
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1C19-C36 Aliphatics 330
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)1000
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)1100
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Total EPH 2100
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1AcenaphtheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Acenaphthylene10
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1AnthraceneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1ChryseneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1FluorantheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Fluorene13
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 12-Methylnaphthalene 21
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1Naphthalene13
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1PhenanthreneND
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 10 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Analytical Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-5Client Sample ID: MW-10
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 16:45
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Pyrene ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1
Analyte
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 85 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 83 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 140-140
o-Terphenyl 60 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 55 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 17:53 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-6Client Sample ID: MW-9D
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:55
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1
Analyte
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1C19-C36 Aliphatics ND
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)ND
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)ND
100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Total EPH ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1AcenaphtheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1AcenaphthyleneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1AnthraceneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1ChryseneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1FluorantheneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1FluoreneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 12-Methylnaphthalene ND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1NaphthaleneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1PhenanthreneND
10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 112 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 110 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 140-140
o-Terphenyl 87 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 77 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 18:27 140-140
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-7Client Sample ID: MW-9D (FILTERED)
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:55
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
C9-C18 Aliphatics ND 180 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1
Analyte
180 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1C19-C36 Aliphatics ND
180 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)ND
180 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)ND
180 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Total EPH ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1AcenaphtheneND
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 11 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Analytical Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-7Client Sample ID: MW-9D (FILTERED)
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:55
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Acenaphthylene ND 18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1
Analyte
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1AnthraceneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Benzo[a]anthracene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Benzo[a]pyrene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1ChryseneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1FluorantheneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1FluoreneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 12-Methylnaphthalene ND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1NaphthaleneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1PhenanthreneND
18 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1PyreneND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 124 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 1
Surrogate
2-Fluorobiphenyl 121 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 140-140
o-Terphenyl 89 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 140-140
1-Chlorooctadecane 85 04/06/11 11:31 04/07/11 19:01 140-140
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 12 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Qualifier Definition/Glossary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
☼Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis.
Abbreviation
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ND Not Detected above the reporting level.
MDL Method Detection Limit
RL Reporting Limit
RE, RE1 (etc.)Indicates a Re-extraction or Reanalysis of the sample.
%R Percent Recovery
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points.
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 13 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Association Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
GC Semi VOA
Analysis Batch: 71525
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
MB 360-71549/1-A Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549MB 360-71549/1-A
LCS 360-71549/2-A Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549LCS 360-71549/2-A
LCSD 360-71549/3-A Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549LCSD 360-71549/3-A
EW-1 Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-1
MW-6 Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-2
MW-7 Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-3
MW-8D Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-4
MW-10 Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-5
MW-9D Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-6
MW-9D (FILTERED)Total/NA Water MA-EPH 71549360-32914-7
Prep Batch: 71549
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
MB 360-71549/1-A Total/NA Water 3510CMB 360-71549/1-A
MW-9D (FILTERED)Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-7
LCS 360-71549/2-A Total/NA Water 3510CLCS 360-71549/2-A
LCSD 360-71549/3-A Total/NA Water 3510CLCSD 360-71549/3-A
EW-1 Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-1
MW-6 Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-2
MW-7 Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-3
MW-8D Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-4
MW-10 Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-5
MW-9D Total/NA Water 3510C360-32914-6
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 14 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Surrogate Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)
Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Water
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-140)(40-140)(40-140)(40-140)
2BN1 FBP1 OTPH1 1COD2
EW-1 94 91 73 81360-32914-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
MW-6 113 110 86 73360-32914-2
MW-7 114 112 84 68360-32914-3
MW-8D 109 106 83 62360-32914-4
MW-10 85 83 60 55360-32914-5
MW-9D 112 110 87 77360-32914-6
MW-9D (FILTERED)124 121 89 85360-32914-7
LCS 360-71549/2-A 98 97 85 63LCS 360-71549/2-A
LCSD 360-71549/3-A 106 105 81 79LCSD 360-71549/3-A
MB 360-71549/1-A 99 98 88 79MB 360-71549/1-A
Surrogate Legend
2BN = 2-Bromonaphthalene
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl
OTPH = o-Terphenyl
1COD = 1-Chlorooctadecane
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 15 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Quality Control Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)
Client Sample ID: MB 360-71549/1-ALab Sample ID: MB 360-71549/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 71525 Prep Batch: 71549
Result Qualifier Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil FacRLRL
C9-C18 Aliphatics ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1
MB MB
Analyte
ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1C19-C36 Aliphatics
ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1C11-C22 Aromatics (Adjusted)
ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)
ND 100 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Total EPH
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Acenaphthene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Acenaphthylene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Anthracene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Benzo[a]anthracene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Benzo[a]pyrene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Chrysene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Fluoranthene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Fluorene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 12-Methylnaphthalene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Naphthalene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Phenanthrene
ND 10 ug/L 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1Pyrene
% Recovery Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil FacLimits
2-Bromonaphthalene 99 40-140 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1
MB MB
Surrogate
98 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 12-Fluorobiphenyl 40-140
88 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 1o-Terphenyl 40-140
79 04/06/11 11:31 04/06/11 20:17 11-Chlorooctadecane 40-140
Client Sample ID: LCS 360-71549/2-ALab Sample ID: LCS 360-71549/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 71525 Prep Batch: 71549
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
C9-C18 Aliphatics 600 428 ug/L 71 40 -140
LCS LCS
DAnalyte
C19-C36 Aliphatics 800 810 ug/L 101 40 -140
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)1700 1760 ug/L 104 40 -140
Acenaphthene 100 93.7 ug/L 94 40 -140
Acenaphthylene 100 94.2 ug/L 94 40 -140
Anthracene 100 102 ug/L 102 40 -140
Benzo[a]anthracene 100 130 ug/L 130 40 -140
Benzo[a]pyrene 100 102 ug/L 102 40 -140
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 100 112 ug/L 112 40 -140
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 100 101 ug/L 101 40 -140
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 100 114 ug/L 114 40 -140
Chrysene 100 115 ug/L 115 40 -140
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 100 110 ug/L 110 40 -140
Fluoranthene 100 105 ug/L 105 40 -140
Fluorene 100 105 ug/L 105 40 -140
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 16 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Quality Control Data
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Method: MA-EPH - Massachusetts - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: LCS 360-71549/2-ALab Sample ID: LCS 360-71549/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 71525 Prep Batch: 71549
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 100 100 ug/L 100 40 -140
LCS LCS
DAnalyte
2-Methylnaphthalene 100 86.7 ug/L 87 40 -140
Naphthalene 100 77.2 ug/L 77 40 -140
Phenanthrene 100 100 ug/L 100 40 -140
Pyrene 100 104 ug/L 104 40 -140
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 98 40 -140
LCS LCS
Surrogate
972-Fluorobiphenyl 40 -140
85o-Terphenyl 40 -140
631-Chlorooctadecane 40 -140
Client Sample ID: LCSD 360-71549/3-ALab Sample ID: LCSD 360-71549/3-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 71525 Prep Batch: 71549
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit
C9-C18 Aliphatics 600 431 ug/L 72 40 -140 1 25
LCSD LCSD
DAnalyte
C19-C36 Aliphatics 800 813 ug/L 102 40 -140 0 25
C11-C22 Aromatics (unadjusted)1700 1660 ug/L 98 40 -140 6 25
Acenaphthene 100 89.2 ug/L 89 40 -140 5 25
Acenaphthylene 100 89.4 ug/L 89 40 -140 5 25
Anthracene 100 94.7 ug/L 95 40 -140 7 25
Benzo[a]anthracene 100 122 ug/L 122 40 -140 6 25
Benzo[a]pyrene 100 96.9 ug/L 97 40 -140 5 25
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 100 109 ug/L 109 40 -140 2 25
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 100 97.1 ug/L 97 40 -140 4 25
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 100 106 ug/L 106 40 -140 7 25
Chrysene 100 108 ug/L 108 40 -140 6 25
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 100 107 ug/L 107 40 -140 4 25
Fluoranthene 100 97.0 ug/L 97 40 -140 8 25
Fluorene 100 99.1 ug/L 99 40 -140 6 25
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 100 99.6 ug/L 100 40 -140 0 25
2-Methylnaphthalene 100 83.7 ug/L 84 40 -140 4 25
Naphthalene 100 75.1 ug/L 75 40 -140 3 25
Phenanthrene 100 93.7 ug/L 94 40 -140 7 25
Pyrene 100 96.3 ug/L 96 40 -140 7 25
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
2-Bromonaphthalene 106 40 -140
LCSD LCSD
Surrogate
1052-Fluorobiphenyl 40 -140
81o-Terphenyl 40 -140
791-Chlorooctadecane 40 -140
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 17 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lab Chronicle
Client: Tighe & Bond TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1
Project/Site: N-0633
Client Sample ID: EW-1 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 12:25
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 15:37 CT TestAmerica Westfield
Client Sample ID: MW-6 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:10
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 16:11 CT TestAmerica Westfield
Client Sample ID: MW-7 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 14:50
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 16:45 CT TestAmerica Westfield
Client Sample ID: MW-8D Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 15:35
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 17:19 CT TestAmerica Westfield
Client Sample ID: MW-10 Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 16:45
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 17:53 CT TestAmerica Westfield
Client Sample ID: MW-9D Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:55
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 18:27 CT TestAmerica Westfield
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 18 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lab Chronicle
Client: Tighe & Bond TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1
Project/Site: N-0633
Client Sample ID: MW-9D (FILTERED)Lab Sample ID: 360-32914-7
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/25/11 13:55
Date Received: 03/28/11 09:50
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total/NA Prep 3510C 71549 04/06/11 11:31 OG TestAmerica Westfield
Total/NA Analysis MA-EPH 1 71525 04/07/11 19:01 CT TestAmerica Westfield
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 19 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Certification Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 360-32914-1Client: Tighe & Bond
Project/Site: N-0633
Laboratory Program Certification IDAuthorityEPA Region
TestAmerica Westfield PH-0494State ProgramConnecticut 1
TestAmerica Westfield E87912NELACFlorida4
TestAmerica Westfield MA00014State ProgramMaine 1
TestAmerica Westfield M-MA014State ProgramMassachusetts 1
TestAmerica Westfield 2539NELACNew Hampshire 1
TestAmerica Westfield MA008NELACNew Jersey 2
TestAmerica Westfield 10843NELACNew York 2
TestAmerica Westfield 647North Carolina DENRNorth Carolina 4
TestAmerica Westfield LAO00057State ProgramRhode Island 1
TestAmerica Westfield VT-10843State ProgramVermont 1
Accreditation may not be offered or required for all methods and analytes reported in this package. Please contact your project manager for the laboratory’s current list
of certified methods and analytes.
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 20 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
State Accreditation Matrix
New
Hampshire
(NELAC) prim. Mass Conn
Florida
(NELAC)
North
Carolina
821-R-02-012 Toxicity, Acute (48-Hour)(list upon request)NP NP
SM 4500 Cl F Chlorine, Residual NP
SM 9215E Heterotrophic Plate Count (SimPlate)P
SM 9222D Coliforms, Fecal (Membrane Filter)P/NP
SM 9223 Coliforms, Total, and E.Coli (Colilert-P/A)P
SM 9224 Coliforms, Total, and E.Coli (Enumeration)P
1103.1 E.coli
Enterolert Enterococcus
200.8 Rev 5.4 Metals (ICP/MS) (list upon request)NP/P NP/P NP/P
200.7 Rev 4.4 Metals (ICP)(list upon request)NP/P NP/P NP/P
6010B Metals (ICP)(list upon request)NP/SW NP/SW
245.1 Mercury (CVAA)NP/P NP NP/P
7470A Mercury (CVAA)NP NP
7471A Mercury (CVAA)SW SW
SM 2340B Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation NP/P NP NP/P
3005A Preparation, Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals NP/P NP/P
3010A Preparation, Total Metals NP/P NP/P
3020A Preparation, Total Metals NP/P/SW NP/P/SW
3050B Preparation, Metals SW SW
504.1 EDB, DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP (GC)P P P
608 Organochlorine Pest/PCBs (list upon request)NP NP NP
625 Semivolatile Org Comp (GC/MS)(list upon request)NP NP
3546 Microwave Extraction SW
3510C Liquid-Liquid Extraction (Separatory Funnel)NP NP
3540C Soxhlet Extraction SW
3550B Ultrasonic Extraction SW SW
600/4-81-045 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC)NP NP
8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)(list upon request)NP/SW NP/SW
8082 PCBs by Gas Chromatography(list upon request)NP/SW NP/SW
8270C Semivolatile Comp.(GC/MS)(list upon request)NP/SW NP/SW
CT ETPH Conn - Ext. Total petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)NP/SW
MA-EPH Mass - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)NP/SW NP/SW
524.2 Volatile Org Comp (GC/MS)(list upon request)P P P
524.2 Trihalomethane compounds P P P
624 Volatile Org Comp (GC/MS)(list upon request)NP NP NP
5035 Closed System Purge and Trap SW SW
5030B Purge and Trap NP NP
8260B Volatile Org Comp. (GC/MS)(list upon request)NP/SW NP/SW
MAVPH Mass - Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (GC)NP/SW NP/SW
180.1 Turbidity, Nephelometric P P P
300 Anions, Ion Chromatography NP/P NP/P NP/P
410.4 COD NP NP NP
1010 Ignitability, Pensky-Martens Closed-Cup Method SW SW
10-107-06-2 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl NP NP NP
7196A Chromium, Hexavalent NP/SW NP/SW
9012A Cyanide, Total and/or Amenable NP/SW NP/SW
9030B Sulfide, Distillation (Acid Soluble and Insoluble)NP NP
9040B pH NP NP
9045C pH SW SW
L107041C Nitrogen, Nitrate NP P NP/P
L107-06-1B Nitrogen Ammonia NP NP NP/P
L204001A CN Cyanide, Total P NP/P NP/P
L210-001A Phenolics, Total Recoverable NP NP NP
SM 2320B Alkalinity NP/P NP/P NP/P
SM 2510B Conductivity, Specific Conductance NP/P NP/P NP/P
SM 2540C Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS)NP/P NP/P NP/P
SM 2540D Solids, Total Suspended (TSS)NP NP NP
SM 3500 CR D Chromium, Hexavalent NP NP
SM 4500 H+ B pH NP/P NP/P NP/P
SM 4500 NO2 B Nitrogen, Nitrite NP P NP/P
SM 4500 P E Phosphorus, Orthophosphate NP/P NP NP/P
SM 4500 P E Phosphorus, Total NP NP NP
SM 4500 S2 D Sulfide, Total NP NP
SM 5210B BOD, 5-Day NP NP NP
SM 5310B Organic Carbon, Total (TOC)NP/P NP NP/P
Not all organic compounds are accreditied under NELAC
For methods with multiple compounds all compounds may not meet NELAC criteria, listing should be obtained from the laboratory
The lab carries additional accreditations with several states. This is the laboratories typcial listing but is subject
to change based on the laboratories current certification standing.
State where Primary Accreditation is Carried
Method Name Description
ambient/
source
NP=Non Potable P= Potable SW=Solid Waste WI-QA-040r5 last updated 3/2/2011
Page 21 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Tighe & Bond Job Number: 360-32914-1
Login Number: 32914
Question Answer Comment
Creator: Knollmeyer, Tim D
List Source: TestAmerica Westfield
List Number: 1
N/ARadioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below
background
N/AThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
TrueSamples were received on ice.
TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.
TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.
TrueCOC is present.
TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.
TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.
TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
TrueThere are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and
the COC.
TrueSamples are received within Holding Time.
TrueSample containers have legible labels.
TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.
TrueSample collection date/times are provided.
TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.
TrueSample bottles are completely filled.
TrueSample Preservation Verified
TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
N/AVOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in
diameter.
TrueIf necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT
needs
TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.
TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.
TestAmerica Westfield
Page 22 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 23 of 23 04/08/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CAPPENDIX C
Well/Boring No. B-1
Sheet 1 Of 1
Project: Job Number:
Client:Date Started: Finished:
Purpose: Rig Type:
Driling Contractor: Martin Geo-Environmental Groundwater Depth:
Driller:
Type & Quantity Core
Sand: NA Type: NA
Bentonite: NA Diameter: NA
Cement: NA Weight NA
Casing/Cap: NA Fall: NA
Depth Recov PID
Ft (In.) (ppm)
5-7 24
7-9 20
▼
9-11 24
11-13 24
13-15 24
15-17 24
17-19 24
Note: No overt evidence of oil saturated soil located throughout boring
Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency trace 0 to 10% clay cl veryfine vf trace tr
0-4 Very Loose 0-2 Very Soft little 10 to 20% silt slt fine f little lt
5-9 Loose 3-4 Soft some 20 to 35% sand snd medium med some sm
10-29 Med. Dense 5-8 Med. Soft and 35 to 50% gravel gvl coarse c and +
30-49 Dense 9-15 Med. Stiff
50+ Very Dense 16-30 Very Stiff
Casing Sample Well
Wet, brn-grey clay, little silt
Moist-wet, brn-grey silt and clay
Moist, brn-grey silt and clay
Per 6"
8
13
Moist, brn-grey silt and clay
47 Center Street
47 Center Street LLC 5/30/2007
TEST BORING / WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Tighe & Bond Consulting Engineers, Westfield, Massachusetts
N-0633
5/30/2007
PROPORTIONS
USED
ABBREVIATIONSPENETRATION RESISTANCE
140 Lb. Wt. Falling 30" on 2" O.D. Sampler
Moist-wet, brn-grey clay and silt
Well
Construction
General
22
27
Moist, brn-grey silt, little clay,tr f snd
Blows
6
8
11
12
StratigraphySample Description
6
15
19
19
16
1
4
9
11
14
3
4
6
5
7
3
3
3
4
6
Wet, brn-grey clay, little silt.
19' EOB
Mobil Drill B-53
Approx. 8' below surface grade
Fuel Oil Release Deliniation
Mike Martin, Doug
Well/Boring No. B-2
Sheet 1 Of 1
Project: Job Number:
Client:Date Started: Finished:
Purpose: Rig Type:
Driling Contractor: Martin Geo-Environmental Groundwater Depth:
Driller:
Type & Quantity Core
Sand: NA Type: NA
Bentonite: NA Diameter: NA
Cement: NA Weight NA
Casing/Cap: NA Fall: NA
Depth Recov PID
Ft (In.) (ppm)
5-7 NA
7-9 NA
10-12 24 ▼
12-14 24
Note: No overt evidence of oil saturated soil located throughout boring
Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency trace 0 to 10% clay cl veryfine vf trace tr
0-4 Very Loose 0-2 Very Soft little 10 to 20% silt slt fine f little lt
5-9 Loose 3-4 Soft some 20 to 35% sand snd medium med some sm
10-29 Med. Dense 5-8 Med. Soft and 35 to 50% gravel gvl coarse c and +
30-49 Dense 9-15 Med. Stiff
50+ Very Dense 16-30 Very Stiff
Mobil Drill B-53
Approx. 10' below surface grade
Fuel Oil Release Deliniation
Mike Martin, Doug
9
10
11
3
7
8
11
10
NA
StratigraphySample Description Well
Construction
General
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5/30/2007
TEST BORING / WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Tighe & Bond Consulting Engineers, Westfield, Massachusetts
N-0633
5/30/2007
140 Lb. Wt. Falling 30" on 2" O.D. Sampler
PROPORTIONS
USED
ABBREVIATIONSPENETRATION RESISTANCE
Blows
Per 6"
NA
NA
47 Center Street
47 Center Street LLC
NA
NA
Moist, brn silt and clay
Moist, brn silt and clay
14' EOB
Casing Sample Well
Well/Boring No. MW-13
Sheet 1 Of 1
Project: Job Number:
Client: Date Started: Finished:
Purpose: T&B Inspector:
Drilling Contractor: Rig Type:
Driller: Groundwater Depth:
Type & Quantity
Sand Type
Bentonite Diameter
Cement Weight
Casing/Cap Fall
Depth Recov PID
Ft (In.) (ppm)
0-2 15 concrete &
8" road box
2" diameter
schedule 40
5-7 24 PVC,
0.010 slot
screen 10-20'
backfilled w/
10-12 24 No.1 well sand
▼to 4'
15-17 24
20-22
Note: No overt evidence of oil saturated soil located throughout boring
Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency trace 0 to 10% clay cl veryfine vf trace tr
0-4 Very Loose 0-2 Very Soft little 10 to 20% silt slt fine f little lt
5-9 Loose 3-4 Soft some 20 to 35% sand snd medium med some sm
10-29 Med. Dense 5-8 Med. Soft and 35 to 50% gravel gvl coarse c and +
30-49 Dense 9-15 Med. Stiff
50+ Very Dense 16-30 Very Stiff
Moist-wet grey clay, tr silt
22' EOB
Moist-wet, brn-grey silt and clay
Moist-wet grey clay, tr silt
Tighe & Bond Consulting Engineers, Westfield, Massachusetts
Core WellCasing Sample
(road base)
9
9
7
No.1 silica well sand
TEST BORING / WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
7
7
3
5
2
4
5
5
10
11
14
4
14
15
20
13
5
Well
Construction
PROPORTIONS
USED
ABBREVIATIONS
Blows
Per 6"
PENETRATION RESISTANCE
140 Lb. Wt. Falling 30" on 2" O.D. Sampler
Moist-wet, brn f-c snd, tr. Gvl, tr coal/coal ash
Mobil Drill B-53
General
StratigraphySample Description
8" flush mount road box
Moist, brn f-med snd and silt, tr. F gvl
PVC
2"
Sched 40
Mike Martin, Doug
47 Center Street, Northampton MA
47 Center Street LLC
Fuel Oil Release Deliniation
Martin Geo-Environmental
Approx 12' below surface grade
5/30/2007
N-0633
5/30/2007
JMP
APPENDIX D
53 Southampton Road • Westfield, MA 01085 • Tel 413.562.1600 • Fax 413.562.5317
N-0633
July 28, 2011
Mayor Clare Higgins
City of Northampton
210 Main Street, Room 12
Northampton, MA 01062
Re: Response Action Outcome Statement
47 Center Street
Northampton, Massachusetts
RTN 1-13601
Dear Mayor Higgins:
In accordance with the Public Notification Procedures of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan
(MCP, 310 CMR 40.1403(3)(f) and (h)), we are writing to notify you of the submittal to the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) of a Immediate Response
Action Completion, Phase IV Completion and Response Action Outcome (RAO) Statement for
the above-referenced site. The 47 Center Street site is the location of a historical release of
No. 2 fuel oil from an underground storage tank (UST). The RAO Statement details
assessment and remedial activities performed at the site in response to the historical fuel oil
release.
As a result of assessment and remedial activities performed at the site, a Class A-2 RAO
Statement has been prepared for the release, indicating that a condition of No Significant
Risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare and the environment exists at the site and no
further response actions are required. A portion of the disposal site boundary is located
with Center Court (City public right-of-way), therefore you are receiving a copy of this
report also. A copy of the RAO submittal is also available for review online at DEP’s website.
The file can be accessed at the following web address:
http://public.dep.state.ma.us/wsc_viewer/main.aspx,
under the file listed for DEP RTN 1-13601. In addition, public file review sessions are
scheduled weekly by appointment. For more information about file reviews, please call the
MADEP Service Center at (413) 784-1100. If you have any questions or comments about
this correspondence, please contact me at (508) 471-9621.
Very truly yours,
TIGHE & BOND, INC.
Marc J. Richards, P.E., LSP
Senior Project Manager/Associate Enclosure – Copy of RAO Report
Copy: City of Northampton Health Department
MA DEP Western Regional Office
47 Center Street, LLC – Mr. Eric Suher
J:\N\N0633\N0633\REPORT\2011 RAO\RAO Public Notification_City.doc
EAPPENDIX E
Tighe & Bond
1 5/27/09
REGULATORY LIMITATIONS
Each report and any and all work product provided in connection with the
performance of each environmental site assessment is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Each report is prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of 47 Center
Street LLC (Client) and is subject to and issued in accordance with the
Agreement and the provisions thereof. Each report and any findings contained
therein shall not, in whole or in part, be provided to or used by any other
person, firm, entity or governmental agency in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of Client and Tighe & Bond. However, Tighe & Bond acknowledges and agrees that, subject to the Limitations set forth herein and
prior written approval by Tighe & Bond, a report may be provided to specific
financial institutions, attorneys, title insurers, lessees and/or governmental
agencies identified by Client at or about the time of issuance of a report in
connection with the conveyance, mortgaging, leasing, or similar transaction involving the real property which is the subject matter of a report and any work
product. Use of a report for any purpose by any persons, firm, entity, or
governmental agency shall be deemed acceptance of the restrictions and
conditions contained therein, these Limitations and the provisions of Tighe &
Bond’s Agreement with Client. No warranty, express or implied, is made by way
of Tighe & Bond’s performance of services or providing an environmental site assessment, including but not limited to any warranty with the contents of a
report or with any and all work product.
2. In preparing a report, Tighe & Bond, Inc. may rely on certain information
provided by governmental agencies or personnel as well as information and/or
representations provided by other persons, firms, or entities, and on information
in the files of governmental agencies made available to Tighe & Bond at the time
of the site assessment. To the extent that such information, representations, or
files may be inaccurate, missing, incomplete or not provided to Tighe & Bond,
Tighe & Bond is not responsible. Although there may be some degree of overlap
in the information provided by these various sources, Tighe & Bond does not assume responsibility for independently verifying the accuracy, authenticity, or
completeness of any and all information reviewed by or received from others
during the course of the site assessment.
3. No attempt is made to assess the compliance status of any past or present
Owner or Operator of a site with any Federal, state, or local laws or regulations,
unless specifically indicated otherwise in writing.
4. Tighe & Bond does not assume responsibility for the impacts of any changes in
environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to the preparation of each report.
Tighe & Bond
2 5/27/09
5. If additional environmental or other relevant information is developed at a later
date, Client agrees to bring such information to the attention of Tighe & Bond
promptly. Upon evaluation of such information, Tighe & Bond reserves the right
to recommend modification of this report and its conclusions.
6. Chemical constituents that are not the subject of this investigation and which
are not included in the list of analyzed parameters for a study may be present in
soil and/or ground water at a site, and Tighe & Bond assumes no responsibility
therefore.
7. If included, any database search is conducted under the Notice of
Disclaimer/Waiver of Liability included in the database search report.
J:\N\N0633\N0633\REPORT\2011 RAO\RegLimit.doc
Offices are located
throughout New England.
www.tighebond.com Tighe&Bond