06-001 \A1
lv A
AREA OF C13CAkiSis
Assessor's Map
11. List of Abutters: Address Sheet No. Parcel
1 Ethel G. Sloat, 600 Haydenville Road, Leeds 6 3
2 John E. and Elsie D. Heller, 582 Haydenville Rd LAAdg 6 4
3 Doanld R. Affhouser, 26 Sumner Ave. , Florence MaQs h 552
4. Elks, The benevolent and protective order, Lodge 997
-
43 Center 'street, Northampton, Mass. 6 !L8
6. Town of Williamsburg Planning Board, Haydenvi l l e, M9ag.
7. 1 l �✓�✓Y.ci �.t F LrXri ® ( ` L _ 7 1 40 a ll J J6/LAd C� `
8. ��c rU
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15._
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
THE^PRINIING PRE55
(Attach additional sheets, if necessary)
Do Application Number:` 7
Ix ;+ Filed Fee Pd. Rec'd. ZBA Map(s) ParceI(s)
gy r By " Date Amt. Date By Date
c; I 6 .�
9
APPLICPj, I' TO THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:
1, m�� iV,ts�eNADE
th L. Vile and Stephanie M. Vile
Na ��I a P
Address 666 Haydenville Road, Leeds, Massachusetts
2. Owner of Property Kenneth L. Vile and Stephanie M. Vile
Address aydenville , oad, Leeds, Massachusetts
3. Applicant is: Owner; El Contract Purchaser; ❑Lessee; ❑Tenant in Possession.
4. Application is made for:
VARIANCE from the provisions of Section V page 5-9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Northampton.
Li SPECIAL PERMIT under the provisions of Section page of the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Northampton.
i ;OTHER:
5. Location of Property 666 Haydenville Road, Leeds being situated on
the West side of Ha.ydenyille Road XXXXt; and shown on the Assessors' Maps,
Sheet No. 6 Parcel(s) 2
6. Zone SR
7. Description of proposed wQ4(,-�e use; Beauty Parlor
8. Sketch plan attached; �+Nes []No
9. Site plan: ! Attched ' Not Required
10. Set forth reasons upon which application is based: Substantial hardship
11. Abutters (see instructions; list on reverse side of form).
12. 1 hereby certify that information contained herein is true to the best of my knowledge.
Date July Z 1 !978 Applicant's Signature —
,'�,�x
U
r�3. `���
x A
00
I/Lo I
NING 30A'I.D OF
At its on s Iiednesday, F)eptember 6, the Zoning
board of Appealz for the i�ity of Northampton voted to dery
the
petition of Kt_�nneth and phar,'ie Vile for a variance to Qze�rate a
b0autY sh0P il, a suiburban resiAdential
Based upon evidence -,)re,�."e-Ited to the board, the Hoard made the
f'oll Twin g, i
,s in re�7,ard to the variance, :
1. The PrOP(CrtY in its present form has no speciai conditiors
which affect it but not other properties in the district.
2. The literal enforcement of the /,onin,,.,, Urdinance doc _3 rii�,t
create a hc'-. dshiP to the owners in that their being forced,
to vacate a dowj-jtowT-j location was not a resuit of' this
Zoning Urdinance and that although they might be havinT
trouble maintairiin,- the property,
this would not nece sar-
iiY be true of another owner.
'3 'I'lle PrOPO J,�d use wiii not be detrimentai to the pubii.c
good t1hi, kind of nuzines- woijId not create undue traf-
fic coriJeZtlon or
40 The prop,,)�7ec,,t
Id T`ul.lir'l Or the intent )i'
the �o,
w;,-)-JId allow a busines,,:; in
a jistr`Lf_I 2"J",eld f--jr re-:-,identiai 11�"e 3r-,.d bf,.ca,,i,-',e no spec-
ial Cf,-.)r, Ir'Lon tjc� nropert�, been hown.
j r
T777,
1 0 1978
Wn OF gUUNNG.IWECTIONS
AUG:MW M XI
01
SMUMN.MK 01060