03-007 (4) PROPOSED DRIVE YOOMOM(TOWAL) 11/i ALVN A RFJ�K 79.63' • g R � =
ElOSI1N0 DmVmy TO BE ASANDONED TIYPICAL) k.�R L.REJNm / x
Cly • MMAL F.CURM POND PONT w"vy w How
15 Nvti ,160.00' //(/I I/I III -PRIYO,hRR11AY to
CCP NFLORN RIS
L PA
if
I.P. ._,B,
_ E 551 .37'
66.46' ,��,� �° ^ �.(�M1 1bS/SPLLwIIY AST- 76 POND
20.8
P sPRLwY ' /(
N28'3VOYE NK-768.63 // u
36.70'
FOR REC,STRY USE
'� ,� NSCSO'2tw•-+ 257.67• PROPOSED BARN I / / / // \\ 110
148 / /
�T�Z
s 93.9w -east 4y 4r LOT #2 \\ / / �//// / //// I /PROPOSW HOUSE\:
O PAIN + F 1�5.807Aa 146— j/
LOT #1 / / //�, / / I I , FIAC LOT CIRCLE c 2615'DIAMETER>
\ , ames S.F. x p O I O P
si V3rww I.P. 756 Ao -1
94.4• N!NRABLA7KABAT
v5,to,A7
e
oyff ^ D 1!/ �Y
°dt
1r• a9
{ LEGEND
APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDMSION
CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED. r ?T t "J ,.. gwiv E10 7M DIVE
NORTHAMPTON PLANNINGP8 +
BOARD
MDABERS: w N66221�w EIOBING DRIVE TO BE ABNOONED
PROPFRIY LNE AT
COLES STAR 10+000 RoAO N/f CARL MORN
SDV 6+08 C". 168.0
200 2Do
DATE:
PLAN OF LAND
NOTES' DRIVEWAY CENITIUNE GRADE IN
1.) Tw PARCETS an"ARE unam N Tw RR zom ISO NORTHAMPTON, MA
L) LOTS t AND 2.ToorniER,ARE SIIOIW!AS ASSESSOR
MAP 3 PARCEL 7.
3.) THE PROPERTY PEIOIEIER NFOIONIION WAS COMPRFD
FROM A PLAN DMnM.PLAN OF LAND N NORn7AWMK PREPARED FOR:
MASBACHUSETO SURVEYED FOR GEORGE w.PAW am HUM"
'M OF NNORiMAJAPI la. ' E`` GEORGE W. PAGE, JR.
4.) LOT a A FLAG Lm:auLDNG,5 PIDWSInD OIAY ISO 158 CENTRAL PARK DRIVE
N WRH TIE SPETyAL FlAO lDT PROY190N5 160
OF THE NORTNAIMM ZONNC OFDK%WE. PROPOSEv GARAGE HOLYOKE, MA 01040
5.) ALL DRIVE YODIFICAMe SHALL PROVIDE AN 60 Fr srA: tB+73.a EUM. 14440
NNLMUL RADRIS,UK=anoase NOTED. PREPARED BY: s s►��OF �
DRIVEWAY PROFILE BRUCE SALUK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I cERTIFY THAT-Tas PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED HORIZONTAL SCALE' « 576 BOSTON POST ROAD
IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE RULES AND REGUTATIONS VER ICAL SCALE
OF THE REGISTERS JU DEEDS of THE COMMON- I40 140 MARLBOROUGH, MA 01752
WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
-7-74- DATE: JUNE 15, 1994 SCALE: *0■••M
DATE REC. LAND SURVEYOR Rd.AA s T.7964
� o o Ft>R so 720
8+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 1 4+00 73+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 18+00 20+00 GRAPHIC SCALE
10. Do any signs east on the property? YES NO X
IF YES,describe size,type and location:
Are there any proposed changes to or additions of signs intended for the property?YES N/A NO
IF YES,describe size,type and location:
11. 'ALL INFORMATION MUST BE COMPLETED, or PERMIT CAN BE DENIED DUE TO
LACK OF INFORMATION.
22" cc U== to be ti?od in
_ by the Rmild1 n part= ne
!Required
Existi..9 "ronosed �� By Zoning
Lot size
6.927 Ac. Same 80,000 Sq. Ft.
Frontage 105.15' 50' 50'
Setbacks '
- side L: R: L:1151 R: 125' 40'
- rear
220' 100`
Building height 30' 35'
Bldg Square footage
%Open Space:
(Lotarea minus bldg
&paved parking
85%
# of Parking spaces N/A
# of Loading Docks N/A
Fill:
(volume & location) N/A
13 . Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein
is true and accurate to the best of my knowl dge.
DATE: A)12S AFJ� APPLICANT's SIGNATU
NOTE: Issul9knatfi of a zoning permit does not relle a an pplioa is burden to oomply with all
zoning requirements and obtain all required per its m the Board of Health, Conservation
Commission, Department of Publlo Works and of applioable permit granting authorities.
FILE if
Q J� C ~
F11 a No.
DlJf OF
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFOMMTION
P5/►tcrc,c� ��1 si.
1. Name of Applicant: Margaret Hughes Z U"fM'e5 A'4z.I ""Jc'e y 4E, Vv�aF MiQ
Address: 160 Appleton Street, Cambridee.MA Telephone: 1-617-876-1895 �"��ZG�►-7d��
02138
2. Owner of Property: Nancy Hughes
Address:P.O. Box 9, Deer Isle, Maine 04627 Telephone:
3. Status of Applicant: Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee
Other(explain): Sisters
4. Street Address: Coles Meadow Rd. , Norhtampton ,
Parcel Id: Zoning Map# 3 Parcel# 7 District(s): RR/WSP
(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT)
5. Existing Use of Structure/Property Existing Woods & Open Fields, Currently Subject
to Flag Lot Permit.
6. Description of Proposed Use/Work/Project/Ogcypation: (Use additional sheets if necessary):
Applicant Wishes to Construct 3A Family Residential Structurpgfor
Retired Family Members.
7. Attached Plans: Sketch Plan Site Plan Engineered/Surveyed Plans
Answers to the following 2 questions may be obtained by checking with the Building Dept or Planning Department Files.
8. Has a Special Permit/Variance/Finding ever been issued for/on the site? (Flag Lot)
NO DON'T KNOW YES X IF YES,date issued:
IF YES: Was the permit recorded at the Registry of Deeds?
NO DON'T KNOW YES X
IF YES: enter Book 4563 Page 126 and/or Document#
9. Does the site contain a brook,body of water or wetlands? NO DON'T KNOW YES X
IF YES, has a permit been or need to be obtained from the Conservation Commission?
Needs to be obtained X Obtained ,date issued:
(FORM CONTINUES ON OTHER SIDE)
FILE # 9389
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON• J4 A,—/'11' '7 A�' L-/,
ADDRESS/PHONE:
PROPERTY LOCATION: C�
MAP PARCEL: 17 ZONE X
THIS SECTION FOR-OFFICIAL USE ONLY:
PERNUT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
ENCLOSED REQUIRED DATE
ZONING FORM FILLED OUT ,4�-3
Rliildin2 Permit Filled mit
THE FOLLOWING ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN ON THIS AP ICATION-
Approved as presented/based on information presented
v Denied as presented:
Special Permit and/or Site Plan Required under: §.�•L..'PLANNING BOARD BOARD ZONING BOARD
Received&Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
Finding Required under:§ w/ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Received&Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
I/
Variance Required under: § w/ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Received&Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
Other Permits Required:
Curb Cut from DPW Water Availability Sewer Availability
Septic Approval-Bd of Health Well Water Potability-Bd Health
!Permit from Conservation Com s' u
Z. leq-5---
Signature of B ding r ate
NOTE:Issuance of a zoning permit does not relieve an appiioants burden to oomply with all
zoning requirements and obtain all required permits from the Board of Health, Conservation
Commission, Department of Publio Works and other applioable permit granting authorities. —
Hughes Project
Total Lot Area 301,739 Sq. Ft. = 6.927 Ac.
Area Open Space, Including Easement 151,641 Sq. Ft. = 3.481 Ac.
(3.481 Ac. = 50.2% of the Lot)
Wetland & Land of 20% Slope or greater = 0.778 Ac.
(0.778 Ac. = 20.88% of Open Space)
protect natural resources & water supplies
C. Estimated daily and peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed use,
traffic patterns for vehicles and pedestrians showing adequate access to and
from the site, and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site.
CONSULT ZONING FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR MAJOR PROJECTS.
Minimal Size of Project.
Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared (and stamped) by a registered Architect,
Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer.
A. LOCUS (show where your project is on this or another map)
See Site Plan
(dell\pb\siteplan.pb 3/6/92)
SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS--OPTIONAL REQUEST FOR WAIVER
The application MUST include a site plan and documentation with the following
information. Upon written request, the Planning Board may waive the submission of any
of the required information, provided that the Applicant provides some written
information on each of the items and explains why a waiver is appropriate.
For each requested waiver circle the item number and fill in the reason for your
request in the space provided. Use additional sheets if necessary. See the Zoning
Ordinance for all site plan requirements.
B. Site plan(s) at a scale of 1" = 40' showing- F.xi sti nz Conditions & 'Pro=used Tm=rovements.
B-1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of the project, date
and scale of plans; Nancy. Hughes. P, .s Box 9. De
B-2. Location and boundaries of the lot, adjacent streets or ways, location and owners
names of all adjacent properties and those within 300 feet of the property line,
and all zoning district boundaries; -
B-3. Existing and proposed buildings, setbacks from property lines, building
elevations, and all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans of all exterior
facades structures are encouraged);
B-4. Present & proposed use of the land and buildings;
B-5. Existing and proposed topography at two foot contour intervals, showing
wetlands, streams, surface water bodies, drainage swales, floodplains, and
unique natural land features (for intermediate projects the permit granting
authority may accept generalized topography instead of requiring contour
lines);
B-6. Location of parking & loading areas, public& private ways, driveways, walkways,
access & egress points, proposed surfacing•
B-7. Location and description of all stormwater drainage facilities, (including
applicable calculations and drainage public & private utilities, sewage disposal
facilities, and water supply;
(3B-8 Existing & proposed landscaping, trees and plantings (size &type of plantings),
stone walls, buffers, and fencing; Applicant Wishes to Treat the Landscaping.
as Same as any Single Family Residence.
B-9. Location, dimensions, height, color, illumination of existing and proposed signs;
None Proposed
CB- 0 'rovisions for refuse removal, with facilities for screening of refuse when
appropriate; Trash Cans to be Stored in the Garages.
B-11 An erosion control plan (for major projects only) and other measures taken to
E. The requested use meets any special regulations set forth in the Zoning
Ordinance.
The proposed project is a permitted use by special permit and will provide
protection for open space and protect the integrity of the area.
F. , The requested use bears a positive relationship to the public convenience
or welfare. The use will not unduly impair the integrity of character of
the district or adjoining zones, nor be detrimental to the'-health,.-morals,
or general welfare. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of the Ordinance.
The proposed project will protect a large beaver pond, provide the opportunity
to construct walking trails to connect other land owned by the City and provide
controls on the development not provided with the construction of a single
family residence.
r tiw
Question 9: How does the project comply with Special Permit criteria:
A. The requested use protects adjoining premises against seriously detrimental
uses.
The subject property is a portion of a previously approved flag lot. The
paved driveway has been constructed and underground utilities and two (2)
wells have been installed. The location of the proposed buildings has been
moved to the north of the original building location. Part of the bituminous
concrete driveway has been removed and a new gravel driveway will be constructed
to better serve the house locations. The proposed cluster of homes is surrounded
by wooded areas and will have no impact on any adjoining premises.
B. The requested use will promote the convenience and safety of vehicular
and pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets, minimize
traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area.
The proposed project has the driveway in existence and will generate a minimum
amount of traffic and have a minimal impact on Coles Meadow Road.
C. The requested use will promote a harmonious relationship of structures
and open spaces to the natural landscape, existing buildings and other
community assets in the area.
The proposed houses are designed to blend into the natural landscape and are
not visible from Coles Meadow Road.
D. The requested use will not overload, and will mitigate adverse impacts
on, the City's resources including the effect on the City's water supply
and distribution system, sanitary and storm sewage collection and treatment
systems, fire protection, streets and schools.
The proposed project has on site water and sanitary facilities. All storm
water runoff will be recharged on site and will not impact any municipal services.
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1. PERMIT AUTHORITY(IES): ZBA Planning Board x Council
2. Applicant's Name: James Lawrence as Agent for Margaret Hughes
Address: 85 Mountain St. , Williamsburg Telephone: 268-7099
3. Property Owner: Nancy Hughes
Address: P.O. Box 9, Deer Isle, Maine 04.627 Telephone:
4. Status of Applicant:Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee
Other (explain) Contractor
5. Parcel Identification: Zoning Mae fJarce1 Zoning District: RR wsP
Street Address:--,.
6. Special Permit requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 11 . 4 , Pg 11 - 8
7. Site Plan is for:Intermediate Project x or Major Project
None (only for a Sign)
8. Narrative Description of the Proposed Project (Use additional sheets if
necessary): Construction of 3 Single Family Residential Structures
for Retired Family Members.
9. How does project comply with Special Permit criteria: (See Applicant's Guide for
criteria-use additional sheets is necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
10. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers, must be attached.
11. . Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached.
12. 1 certify that I have read the permit criteria and that the information contained
herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I (or the landowner
if I am not the landowner) grant the Zoning Board and Planning Board
permission to enter the property to review this application.
Date: Applicant's Signature: If
(memorex\wp\forms\siteplan.pb 4/2/93)
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development u ice'
City Hail - 210 Main Street s
Northampton, MA 01060 - (413) 586-6950 ' ' $
FAX(413) 586-3726
-Community and Economic Development $ t
-Conservation -Historic Preservation
-Planning Board-Zoning Board of Appeals
-Northampton Parking Commission
TO: Frank Si,enkiewicz, Building Inspector
RE: Permit application
FROM: Laura Vrutzler , Board Secretary/OPD
DATE: November 28, 1995
Would you please review and return the
Special Permit with Site
enclosed Plan Approval application
before the Planning Board
meeting scheduled for December 14, 1995S0
that we can advisethe Boards of any
concerns you may have.
Thank you.
• D�
PRECAUTIONS DURING BUILDING OPERATIONS
SECTION 3019.0 HEALTH HAZARDS
3019.1 General: Every construction or maintenance operation which results in the
diffusion of dust, stone and other small particles, toxic gases or other harmful
substances in quantities hazardous to health shall be safeguarded by means of local
ventilation or other protective devices to insure the safety of the public as required
by the regulations of the administrative official.
3019.2 Removal of dust: Dust, sand blasts or other harmful agents,when employed
or occurring in construction operations, shall be disposed of at or near the point of
origin to prevent their diffusion over adjoining premises or streets.
3019.3 Protective equipment: Facilities shall be provided in approved closed
containers for housing the necessary vision, respiratory and protective equipment
required in welding operations, and in accordance with the regulations of the
administrative official. '
SECTION 3020.0 WELDING SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
3020.1 Welding enclosures: All welding and flame-cutting operations shall be
performed in protected areas with full consideration of safety and fire hazards. Such
closed spaces shall be properly ventilated while welding or cutting is being done.
Suitable protection against the rays of the electric arc shall be maintained by the
contractor where arc welding operations might be viewed within harmful range by
persons other than the welding operators and inspectors.
3020.2 Flammable materials: Proper precautions shall be taken to avoid all risk
of fire or explosion, and flammable or explosive materials shall not be stored in the
Vic' 't of welding or cutting operations. S
SANITATION
9,4 a
.a
u
.m or rep., it shall
�
et and
i i ce vvtt e assn use ate lumti ng ode (248 GMR
SECTION 3022.0 DISPUTES
3022.1 General: The building official, when requested by any person, aggrieved or
otherwise, shall serve a written notice on any owner, tenant and their agents who fail
to conform to the requirements of this article directing such person to take the
necessary remedial action. If the person whose duty it is to protect his own or
adjoining property under those provisions fails to proceed to fully comply with such
780 CMR - Fifth Edition 30-11
We the undersigned Residents of Coles Meadow Road are opposed to cluster
housing on 478 Coles Meadow Road for the following reasons:
1 . The units are 100 feet off the Broad Brook
2. Soil conditions are wet.
3. The area is subject to .flash flood in rain storms.
4. The units are in a water supply protection district.
5. The extra sewage will cause a high impact on water supply.
6. Street traffic will increase greatly.
7. A survey count recorded from 8:00 am to 4:00pm on a week before
construction began showed 144 cars and trucks.
8. We have no sidewalks. The street are narrow and winding with no signs
posted -For speeding.
9. Will have major impact on wild life.
10. Initially we were told there is going to be one single family unit and now
it has changed to "Cluster Housing."
Sincerely,
7�
St DDHFlRTI� Lo'Drt�A LO) C°LS S NC-)1Do tJ O eA .
9. HOW DOES THE PROJECT COMPLY WITH SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA
First, the lot meets the other minimum requirements of Section 16.9, namely,
the lot size is well in excess of 80,000 square feet-and the coverage of impervious
surfaces is well below fifteen (15) percent.
Second, the proposed use meets the specific criteria of section 16.7 (C)(1).
Applicant's proposal meets the goals of Section 16 by providing a system that
recharges all drainage run off from impervious surfaces on site, prevents
contamination of groundwater by use of gas and oil traps in the driveway area, and
by installation of subsurface sewage disposal system meeting Title 5 requirements,
and controls soil erosion and sedimentation by use of a hay bale barrier during
construction.
Specifically, the proposal:
(a) "is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the By-Law and will
promote the purposes of the Water Supply Protection District" by providing a low
impact residential use that is designed to avoid any reduction of the quality or quantity
of the public drinking water resources;
(b) "is appropriate to the natural topography, soils, and other characteristics
of the site to be developed";
(c) "has suitable soil for on-lot sewerage and water systems";
(d) "will not, during construction or thereafter, have an adverse
environmental impact on groundwater resources in the district"; and
(e) "will not adversely affect the existing or potential quality and quantity of
water in the Water Supply Protection District".
8. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Applicant wishes-to build-a residential structure with garage, which structure
would be a significantly reduced building envelope as compared to Special Permit#93-
SP-42, eliminating the area for a pool as well. A special permit was originally required
because the proposed improvement is partly within 200 feet of a water course in the
Water Supply Protection District. The wetlands adjacent to the water course were
marked when Owner applied for and received a permit to dredge the pond and grade
around it.
The location of the proposed improvements are shown on the attached plan,
submitted with the Application. The following features are similar to those in 93-SP-
42:
A. A proposed subsurface sewerage disposal system located as shown on
the plan. The original application for a disposal works construction permit was
approved June 3, 1991 , and a Disposal Works Construction Permit issued that
same day. Since the scale of the project will be greatly reduced, it is
applicant's intention to build a smaller disposal unit subject to approval by the
Board of Health.
B. The two catch basins to be located at the northwesterly end of the
driveway adjacent to the house (hereinafter referred to as "catch basin one"
and "catch basin two") shall be constructed pursuant to 93-SP-42.
C. Catch basins one and two shall discharge through an outlet pipe into the
catch basin three. Water shall then discharge through an outlet pipe to the
catch basin four located on the northerly side of the property, all as shown on
the plan. However, given the down-sizing of the project, applicant would
propose that these catch basins may be different.
D. There shall be a foundation drain around the house which shall discharge
into catch basis three or possibly into catch basin four. The roof gutters and
down spouts shall also discharge into a pipe leading to catch basin three or
catch basin four, as shown on the plan.
E. If need be, catclT basin four shall discharge by outlet pipe under the cart
path shown on the plan to a stone masonry endwall. At the endwall will be a
riprap apron twelve feet long and eight feet wide. The total depth of the apron
shall be at least twenty-four inches, with twelve inches or more of angular
stone on top of a twelve inch gravel base. It may be appropriate given the
down sizing of the project to have the outlet pipe come off catch basin three
to an end wall, provided, however, that the same type of riprap apron shall be
constructed .
F. All work shall take place outside the 100 foot wetland buffer zone
pursuant to the requirements set forth in 93-SP-42.
protect natural resources:&water..supplies not applicable - an intermediate project
C. Estimated-dat71/ and peak tour vehicle trips generated by the proposed.use,
t-dffc patterns for vehicles and pedestrians-showing adequate access to and
from the site, and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site.
CONSULT ZONING FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR MAJOR PROJECTS,
not applicable - intermediate project.
Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared (and stamped) by a registered Architect
Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer
A. LOCUS (show where your project is on this or another map)
: r
(deii\pb\sitepiarLpb 316/92)
SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS--OPTIONAL REflUEST FOR WAIVER :..
The application MUST include a sib plan and -documentation with the following
_ Information. Upon written request,the Planning Board.may waive the submission of any
of the required information, provided that the Applicant provides some written
information on each of the items and explains wiry a waiver is appropriate.. .
For each requested waiver circle the item number and fill in the reason for your
request Iri the space provided: *Use additional sheits if necessary. ,See the Zoning
Ordinance for all site plan requirements.
Applicant had .existing topographical
US, " Site plan(s) at a scale of 1" = 40' showing- survey at scale of 1" - 20' .
B-1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of the project, date ,
and scale of plans' See attached.
Location and boundaries of the lot,adjacent streets or ways,location and owners
- names of all adjacent properties'and those within 300 feet of the property Gne,
and all zoning district boundaries; Survey shows areas of lot (totalling over 15+
acres) in which improvements have been made or are .proposed.
Existing and proposed buildings, setbacks from property lines, building
i. elevations, and all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans of all exterior
facades structures are encouraged)' Setbacks now shown; but can be determined
from scale. Elevations now shown, but not applicable to special permit
re uest.
13B 4.:Present & proposed use-df the land and buildings'_ residential
- " B-5. Existing and proposed topography at two foot contour intervals, showing
wetlands, streams, surface water bodes, drainage swales, floodplains, and
unique natural land features (for intermediate projects the permit granting
'- authority may accept generalized topography instead of requiring contour
lines)-
B-8: Location of parking.&loading area's,public&private ways;driveways,walkways,
-`- -.-access & egress points,'proposed surfacing-
B-7. Location and description of all stormwater drainage facilities, (including
— applicable calculations and drainage public & private utilities, sewage disposal
--- facilities, and water supply-
B-8. Existing & proposed landscaping,-trees and plantings (size &type of plantings),
stone walls, buffers, and fencing; Not applicable to special permit request.
C' t. Location, dimensions, height, color,illumination of existing and proposed signs;
- Not applicable to :residential use.
B-10 revisions for refuse removal, with faclities for screening of refuse when
appropriate' Not applicable to residential use.
B-11 An erosion control plan (for major projects only) and other measures taken to
I..x +�
i
+z,rx
C1
IMIT TY OF NORTHAMPTON
PT C[ s )iG INSPECTION AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1. PERMIT AUTHORITY(IES): ZBA x Planning Board Council
2 t' Applicant's Name:' Margaret--,Hughes, Nancy Hughes and John Hughes
Address: P'-O- 'Box 9 , Deer zsI6, ME - Telephone: 207-348-6687
04627
3. Property Owner. George W. Page, Jr. ,
-- Address: 158 Central Park Drive, Telephone: 413-532-1800
Holyoke, MA 01040
4. Status of Applicant:Owner Contract Purchaser x Lessee
_ - Other (explain) -
'5. -Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # Parcel Zoning District: RR/WSP
Street Address: 478 Coles Meadow Road
6. Special Permit requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 16. 7 . Pg 16- 4
7. Site Plan. is for.Intermediate Project x or Major Project
--- --- None (only for a Sign)
8. - , Narrative Description of the Proposed Project (Use additional sheets if
necessary): Applicants wish to purchase - the- property (for which
-': a flag lot special permit application is being pursued
cori'temporaneously by owner) to be comprised of 15.97+ acres and to amend
the residential building envelope previously approved by the ZBA (93-SP 42
by..:reducing the impervious surface area.
9. How does project comply with Special Permit criteria: (See Applicant's Guide for
criteria-use additional sheets is.necessa_ry).
See attached
10. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers, must be attached.
11. Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached.
12 1 certify that 1 have read the permit criteria and that the information contained
herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I (or the landowner
If I am not the landowner) grant*the Zoning Board and Planning Board
• permission to enter the property to review this application.
Date:' 7/11/9 4 Applicant's Signature: 1
(memcrex\wp\tctms\siteptampb 4/2193)
r 0021941 1*
Date Filed File No.
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION (510 . 2)
1 . Name of Applicant: /(, - -keg
Address: 4C. {� ' -3
2 . owner of Property: L L
Address: Cr , mac✓ - Telephone: 41 3 t.3 z /boa
3 . Status of Applicant: Owner Contract Purchaser
Lessee Other (explain: )
4 . Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheet# 3 � ,, Parcel#�,
Zoning District(s) (include1,overl ys)
Street Address \
Required
5 , Existing Proposed by Zonin
Use of Structure/Property
(if project is only -interior work, skip to #6)
Building height
%B1dg. Coverage (Footprint)
Setbacks - front
- side L: R: L: R:
- rear
Lot size
Frontage .
Floor Area Ratio
oOpen Space (Lot area minus
building and parking)
Parking Spaces
Loading
Signs
Fill (volume & location)
6 . Narrative Description of Proposed Work/Project: (Use additional sheets
if necessary) �--
} f,- 7�,L- ,
L` ? !ti 7 - •I .^ 1 \ 9 -7 t' �� �S
1 a ( c !
7 . ki, r2-c/c{C ►� f�-� i wt Q,'�1 c�:SS 5�L cc r
t ached Plans : Sketch Plan Site Plan
8 . Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein
is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. /
Date : hu-< // - /1 elt Applicant' s Signature: l�rl l l�•^
THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:
Approved as presented/based on information presented
—�/benied as presented--Reason: �,%3 L��-rS�"c&;'ArP
special' Permit and/or Site Plan Required:' t/
Finding Required: variance Required:
S gnature of difig Inspector Wat6
NOTE: issuance of a zoning permit does not relieve an applicant's burden to comply with all zoning requirements and obtain all required permits
from the Board of Health,Conservation Commission, Departmoni of Public Works and other applicable permit granting authorities.
i T)-
Owners and
RCF11I1 PARCEI, ADDRESS Owners ' flailing Address
- 032-001 COLES MEADOW RD VOLLINGER JOHN J & GRACE F
460 NORTH FARIiS RD
NORTHAMPTON
MA 01060
001 -001 414 COLES MEADOW RD REJNIAK ALVIN A & JEAN L
414 COLES HEADOW RD
NORTHAMPTON
MA 01060
- 002-001 COLES MEADOW RD REJNIAK ALVIN A & JEAN L REJNI
41.4 COLES ItEADOW RD
C NORTHAMPTON
11A 01060
Assessor' s Certification: 11-r, ro 0— �,
Date: A-, c"
NORTHAMPTON ASSESSOR ' S LABELS
Owners and
PARCEL PARCEL ADDRESS Owners ' planing Address
02 -017-001 COLES MEADOW RD ANDROS DOROTHY
22 FAIRFIELD AVENUE
NORTHAMPTON
HA 01060
02 -018-001 COLES MEADOW RD MICHAEL F . CURTIN POST 8006
V.F .W. HOME ASSOCIATION INC .
18 MEADOW ST
NORTHAMPTON
MA 01060
03 -005-001 COLES MEADOW RD ANDROS DOROTHY
22 FAIRFIELD AVENUE
NORTHAMPTON
HA 01060
03 -006-001 COLES MEADOW RD KABAT THADDEUS L & HELEN
15 MAIN ST PO BOX 472
HATFIELD
ItA 01038
03 -008-001 471 C'OI-,ES MEADOW RD BATRANO JOHN J & VIOLA If
471 COI,ES MEADOW RD
;i RTI►Ap1I'i 0iv'
MA 01060
03 -009-001 501 COLES MEADOW RD ANDROS DOROTHY
22 FAIRFIELD AVENUE
NORTHAMPTON
MA 01060
-014-001 472 COLES MEADOW RD KRIEGER BARRY P & MARY C
472 COLES MEADOW RD
NORTHAMPTON
MA 01060
07 -031-001 COLES MEADOW RD MORIN DENNIS C
220 LINSEED ROAD
W. HATFIELD
HA 01088
Page 1
07/05/94
---
9� 0028611 Date Filed
File No.
ZONING PERMIT APPLI//CI1ATION
1 . Name of Applicant:
Address:_ i S- C�• y %i�; ;� Telephone: ,
2 . Owner of Property:
Address : Telephone:
3 . Status of Applicant:�Owner Contract Purchaser
Lessee Other (explain )
4 . Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheet# arcel#�_,
Zoning District(s) (include overlays)
Street Address .
Required
5. Existing Pro osad by Zoning
Use of Structure/Property v Cn„t
(if project is only interior work, skip t0 6)
Building height
%B1dg. Coverage (Footprint)
Setbacks - front
- side L: R: L: R:
- rear
Lot size Fl_ /57 cr
Frontage
Floor Area Ratio
oOpen Space (Lot area minus
building and parking)
Parking Spaces
Loading
Signs
Fill (volume & location)
6. Narrative Description of Proposed Work/Project: (Use additionalsheets
if necessary) _ I �.,,\o! T J - (F►_,at� CCA
'Y
7. Attached Plans : Sketch Plan Site Plan
8 . Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein
is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Date: Applicant's Signature:
THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:
Approved as presented/based on information presented
/Denied as presented--Reason:
Special' Permit and/or Site Plan Required:
nd' g Re 'red: variance Required,
gnatur o€ uildi ate
NOTE: Issuance of a zoning permit does not relieve an applicant's burden to comply with all zoning requirements and obtain all required permits
from tho Board of Health,Conservation commission, Department of Public Works and other applicable permit granting authortuos.
ic?'L
protect natural resources & water supplies
C Estimated daily and peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed use,
traffic patterns for vehicles and pedestrians showing adequate access to and
from the site, and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site.
CONSULT ZONING FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR MAJOR PROJECTS.
Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared (and stamped) by a registered Architect,
Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer
A. LOCUS (show where your project is on this or another map)
(dell\pb\siteplan.pb 3/6/92)
SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS--OPTIONAL REQUEST FOR WAIVER
The application MUST include a site plan and documentation with the following
information. Upon written request, the Planning Board may waive the submission of any
of the required information, provided that the Applicant provides some written
information on each of the items and explains why a waiver is appropriate.
For each requested waiver circle the item number and fill in the reason for your
request in the space provided. Use additional sheets if necessary. See the Zoning
Ordinance for all site plan requirements.
(�) Site plan(s) at a scale of 1" = 40' showing Plan at i" = 60'
B-1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of the project, date
and scale of plans;
(B-� Location and boundaries of the lot, adjacent streets or ways, location and owners
names of all adjacent properties and those within 300 feet of the property line,
and all zoning district boundaries; Plan does not include all owners within
300 feet.
(:B-:3) Existing and proposed buildings, setbacks from property lines, building
elevations, and all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans of all exterior
facades structures are encouragEed);Not all setbacks shown, but can be
determined from scale. levations not shown but not applicable to special
permit request.
B-4. Present & proposed use of the land and buildings;
B-5. Existing and proposed topography at two foot contour intervals, showing
wetlands, streams, surface water bodies, drainage swales, floodplains, and
unique natural land features (for intermediate projects the permit granting
authority may accept generalized topography instead of requiring contour
lines);
B-6. Location of parking & loading areas, public&private ways, driveways,walkways,
access & egress points, proposed surfacing;
B-7. Location and description of all stormwater drainage facilities, (including
applicable calculations and drainage public & private utilities, sewage disposal
facilities, and water supply; --
Existing & proposed landscaping, trees and plantings (size & type of plantings),
stone walls, buffers, and fencing; Not applicable to special permit request.
(9. Location, dimensions, height, color, illumination of existing and proposed signs;
�� Not applicable to residential use.
(!�O)appropriate;Provisions for refuse removal, with facilities for screening of refuse when
Not applicable to residential use.
B-11 An erosion control plan (for major projects only) and other measures taken to
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1. PERMIT AUTHORITY(IES): ZBA Planning Board x Cou ! 3
/VhCJ MI�W+Tb)W �} S 2. Applicant's Name: George W. Pa e �C h ()F BUR INGIN"FLCTIONS
pM N MA 0106
Address: 158 Central Park Dr. , Holyoke, MA Telephone: (413) , _._ .
01040
3. Property Owner: George W. Page, Jr.
Address: 158 Central Park Dr. , Holyoke, MA Telephone: (413) 532-1800
01040
4. Status of Applicant:Owner x Contract Purchaser Lessee
Other (explain)
5. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # l:,; Parcel-Am Zoning District: RR
Street Address: r(',' ' Coles Meadow Road
6. Special Permit requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 6 .13, Pg 6
7. Site Plan is for:Intermediate Project x or Major Project
8. Narrative Description of the Proposed Project (Use additional sheets if
necessary):: ` from an existing 17.67 acre parcel. The
flag lot would have 105 feet of frontage and an area of 15.8 acres.
The remaining parcel would be a conforming lot.
9. How does project comply with Special Permit criteria: (See Applicant's Guide for
criteria-use additional sheets is necessary) The lot and proposed building
site meet all of the requirements of 6.13 for a flag lot.
10. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers, must be attached.
11. Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached.
12. 1 certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best
of my knowledge.
Date: Applicant's Signature:
ut-Fl E USE ONLY: Date riled: e #:
(deRpb:siteplan.pb 3/6/92)
n -PAP- :i. . Oy / _ �/', 3 . ITY CF NC , T,,% \
' TC
Cf � . CiAL �LTT�; ' LliT
SUZJcCT LCC.' Ti0\ . CCL: L ti . �C 1, RD
AEJtv :A ,K ALVIIli A J E A L r
14 COL : ih _AD '
N RTnAMPTC;+ f:A !1C �C
M ICNAL0WSKI CH LcS L T E _ CiL_: Yi D :A x
:C HENRY
N0RTnAi•1HTC:i f.A 01Ca
a � Ya FETE L = n T T
t.CHTh,: :•IF' TC 4 L T�,c SnIP AT .C ,D zy -C ,? -Ci
L 0 TriAi' ? T0t. rtlL
i+CRTHA PTC;1
nA ;;PTC . L _J r�..TPt_ rtCNI 4TwC : �
1!AIL . 7i � �i;i+ PTO,\ HILT`'
nT.;1T ?� i• �11 �
i•:CJ L OIL C-3 R KAT70N
PERTY TAx.
CALL Tx 7 1
L _i' . I _ � r iTivCr.J'n r yT,,C ;V
�
. ~ n ' LT'
_
CPTnA:1PTC:� r
iSAiSACnUSCT 7 S -^.yiti\�_N'A ALT}' CF L7 C,c i^ _
� -Ccc-CG
A 1'wOC ✓ � }i
N0 T'riA IPTC 0 1 C
r ;, ' * ^ - - .--- ---------------- -
SS : SSC S Cc R. TIf :C r T
Obi' 2 g i�3
i
CITY CL=iKS CF=+CE
NORTN.�'APTQP�..'��SS. )1050
rAnED : uy / 2y/ ^, ? CITY CF NCrq Tr = '4PT;',
: �L a:LTTc4 ' . LIST
SU> J �C �CCAT,C,% CZLc i r . .40Cv KJ
,=N " ';,S DCnJThY CCLES MEAL,"�^
c = RFIELD AV ." ALE
�� R C3 -CGS-CO1
N0RTHAMPTCN , 106 �
K ; IEUEK CARRY P „ AARY C �7c CCL[ 3 y : A Rv C3 —114-CG1
472 CCLES YEA)-L + PC
NCnTHA,1PTCN i!A 01060
JCH J C -C'3c-C G1
`+ L _ CLr '1 ,71 CCLES YE ,.C•C�� �D
471 C'CLE �i YEA0O*" ri
NC .ZTHA ill PTCN' Y C 1 C C
ANDRCS GCnJTh 't SC1 :CL E : t+ ErD;'e 4i; C3 -CJS-CJ1
FAIRFIELi. ALcNLE
i,C'TnA,11PTCN irk J1C�G
FLNK 0 E N N I S L LINDA L C ,L ?3
343 CCLES i%. Ea0:'A AC
NCRTHAMPTCN ,yA G1 )C
rRINGLE FRANC P Jn % FHYLL : S _ 3c� ; ,LES rEA .4 �� C3 -C1C-001
36 : CCLES V, EADC'A RC
NCATnAMPTC + �A 01C3';
MCZ'LANEY LLCYC 4 * LINCA - -^LE _
lrr. r1, � Iti _ hii'�.�d KL C) —1.U4—C vl
340 CCLES yEAD'C „
N C k T H A M P T C N Y.L ir1C3 :
K 3 A T THADDELS L _ HELcN CCLES t D A ,C' C3 -C-9-.-C 01
13 MAIN ST rO cDX 472
r,ATr" IELD f A C1 �33
i! ICHAEL F . CLRTI% PC T E3 CCLES EAD^;, C2 -C1 '?-C 01
V . F . . . HCi" ;. Assoc IA T ICw :NC .
1E :MEA00t. ET
NCRTmA Nil TCN fwA 011C-3C
ilCkIN )E N N I S CC C7 -C31 -001
�2j LINS =Ec R-DAC
HATFIELD 'MA 01 --13
REJNIAK ALVIN A - JEAN L 414 CCLES YE:,OC'A RC C3 -CJ1 -CC1
414 CCLES r EADCt% RC
uGRTHAMPTCN i~A .31COC
"CS DCFCThY C ::LES C2 -C17-C �O1
L2 IFE: �+V-
TriAPI?TCt, . 1 c C M
VCLLINGER JOh:v J - = � U ulEc �'EAOC„ Ri C7 -C32-C '01
4CG NORTH F.4K;•l
,,ORThA '!P1Ct� :MA 01 C" t�f2 8S
CITY CLERKS OFl•10E
NORTHAMPTON MASS 01060
-
9 �
Date Filed
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
1 . Name of Applicant: ,
u
Address : loo >3 k. -7 - or l�%� � e ephonba 2-c j
2 . Owner of Property:Address :_,
114-4
3 . Status of Applicant: Owner contract Purchaser _
Lessee Other (explain: )
4 . Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheeto 3 Parcel#�_,
Zoning District(s) (include/,}overl ys)
Street Address l.d 4 t e_ttx-, \
Required
5 . Existincr Proposed by Zoning
Use of structure/Property
(if project is only interior work, skip to #6)
Building height
°aB1dg . Coverage (Footprint)
Setbacks - front
- side L: R: L• R:
- rear
Lot size
Frontage.
Floor Area Ratio
. %Open Space (Lot area minus
building and parking)
Parking spaces
Loading
Signs
Fill (volume & location)
6 . Narrative Description of Proposed Work/Project: (Use additional sheets
if necessary) A �,llrr�„�? L,,,cl, nc„�,-l_ �c� tZ-� ��� �/�Y LvL L 4--
�CG Jr LC(C �/i1il / Gt ) r r ' i Pr lam^ Lt✓ �� Cart �Crtl-
c 7 rrZ
r a v V z 114 3S
7 . tac/��hed Plans: Sketc Plan Site Plan
8 . Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein
is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Date: d GL� Applicant's Signature: A 11,fI
THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:
Approved as presented/based on information presented
T�benied as presented--Reason:_pg -- �y„13 zoT-.SAC/ �flP
Special' Permit and/or Site Plan Requiredl%
Finding Required: Variance Required:
'17/,x 1e-V
Signature of ding Inspector a
NOTE: Issuance of a zoning permit does not reffave an applicant's burden to comply witli all zoning requirements and obtain ap required permits
from tho Board of Hoalth, Conservation CornmlSSlon,Department of Pubilc Works and other appiicabto permit granting authoritloa.
Planning Board has since approved a flag lot. Bill Brandt said
that there. is a reduction in the lot size to 15 acres and a big
_ reduction- in the impervious surface.
Alex Ghiselin moved to take the matter under advisement and reach
a decision at a later time. William Brandt seconded the motion
which passed unanimously 3:0. y:--
. 4 _
Alex Ghiselin moved to approve the special Permit with the
conditions as outlined in the special permit granted to George W.
Page, Jr. on November 17, 1993 and tiled with the City Clerk
December 1, 1993 and to approve the site Plan entitled Plan of Land
in Northampton, MA Prepared for George W. Page, Jr. and Prepared
by: Bruce saluk i Associates, 576 Boston Post Road, Marlborough,
MA 01752, and dated June 15, 1996. William Brandt seconded the
motion which passed unanimously 3:0.
F
J
II
a permit if any future housing were planned. Neiman said that any
cluster would be limited to 2-3 units because of the 105' frontage.
Any cluster would have to be within the building envelope already
approved.
Mark Raney said he had no problem with a single-family home on the
property but still worried about future development on the parcel.
Sanford Weil said that the Board could stipulate that any changes
in the approved plan would have to be approved by the ZBA.
Al Ramiec who lives on the south side of the property said he was
worried about the septic system. He was told that one septic plan
has already been approved by the Board of Health and would have to
be approved again by the Board of Health if there were changes. He
said he was concerned about the septic system leaching into the
brook.
Paulette Kuzdeba reviewed the original approval of the plan.
Sanford Weil explained the appeal process.
Shirley Kobasiak of 248 Coles Meadow Road said when George Page
applied for a Special Permit, it was granted on the basis of the
entire frontage of the property, not just 105' frontage that the
current application is based upon. She said she thinks the
original permit should be voided. Paulette Kuzdeba said that this
application was under the Water Supply Protection District, and
that the Board was concerned with coverage by impervious surface.
Kobasiak said the lot was very wet. The Board will approve or deny
the application based on the amended plans. All conditions from
the original Special Permit will remain in effect. The impervious
surface area in the applicant's request has been reduced by half
from the original permit.
Mr. Raniec said that the area is wet and muddy all the time. Weil
said that the Planning Board had already approved the Site Plan.
Todd Sienkiewicz of 501 Coles Meadow Road asked whether the
approval was based on a single-family home. Weil said that the
Board would stipulate specific plans for a single-family home in
their decision. Kuzdeba cautioned the Board against such a
stipulation since an accessory or in-law apartment would be allowed
by right. Kuzdeba said that the permit request is for building
coverage and not for the type of building.
William Brandt moved to close the Public Hearing. Alex Ghiselin
seconded the motion which passed unanimously 3:0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Ghiselin said that he thought the area was fairly fragile.
Kuzdeba said that the Board was not considering any change in any
type of units, but were supposed to consider amount of impervious
surface, building size, and any impacts on the Water Supply
Protection District. Ghiselin said that the Special permit was
predicated on the fact that the property was a 17 acre parcel. The
ZBA Meeting of August 17, 1994
Vice Chairman Weil opened the Public Hearing on the request of
Margaret, Nancy and John Hughes to amend a Special Permit and Site
Plan Review under §16.7, page 16-4 of the Zoning Ordinance for the
construction of a residential building at 478 Coles Meadow Road.
Present and sitting on the case were: Vice Chair M. Sanford Weil,
Jr. , Associate Member William R. Brandt, and Member Alex Ghiselin.
A Legal Notice of this public hearing was published in the Dail
Hampshire Gazette on August 3, 1994 and August 10, 1994 . Vice
Chair Weil reviewed procedures for conducting public hearings.
Attorney Kenneth Neiman was present on behalf of the applicants.
Margaret Hughes was also present. Attorney Neiman said that the
original Special Permit was granted to George W. Page, Jr. but that
the Hughes were applying to amend the Special permit dated November
17, 1993 because they have a purchase and sales agreement with Mr.
Page and plan to build a home on the land. The Planning Board
approved the establishment of a flag lot on the property. The
Hughes currently live in Deer Isle, Maine and want to move to
Northampton. John and Margaret Hughes are husband and wife and
Nancy Hughes is Mr. Hughes sister. The previous Special Permit
allowed for construction of a home and coverage of 12, 000 square
feet of impervious surface including a deck and a swimming pool.
The Hughes have eliminated plans for the swimming pool and will
build a much smaller home than Mr. Page had planned to build on the
property. The Hughes will then be covering less impervious surface
than the ZBA previously approved. The Planning Board has
recommended that the ZBA approve the request. The conditions on
the original Special Permit shall remain in effect for the amended
Special Permit.
Correspondence received from the Board of Health and the DPW noted
no concerns on the proposal.
Attorney Neiman said that abutters at the Planning Board meeting
had expressed concern about further sub-division of the land. He
said that technically there was enough land to create another flag
lot on the property but that the Hughes had no intention of
creating further sub-divisions of the land. Paulette Kuzdeba urged
the ZBA that a specific plan should be sited in the decision.
No one spoke in favor of the plan.
Mark Raney of Gilbert Road in Southampton said his father owns the
abutting land and they had concerns and questions about the future
use of the land. He expressed concern about the possibility of a
future sub-division on the property and whether there might be
cluster housing allowed on the site.
Attorney Neiman said the plans call for a single-family home but
there may be future plans for a cluster house for Nancy Hughes, but
he noted that the applicants would have to come back to the ZBA for
Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws (MGL) , Chapter 40A,
_ Section 11, no Special Permit, or any extension, modification or
renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have
elapsed after the decision has been filed, or if such an appeal
has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded
in the Hampshire County registry of Deeds or Land Court, as
applicable and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The
fee for such recording or registering shall be paid by the owner
or applicant. It is the owner or applicant's responsibility to
pick up the certified decision from the City Clerk and record it
at the Registry of Deeds.
The Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals hereby certifies that an
Amendment has been Granted to the existing Special Permit and
that copies of this decision and all plans referred to in it have
been filed with the Planning Board and the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 15,
notice is hereby given that this decision is filed with the
Northampton City Clerk on the date below.
If anyone wishes to appeal this action, an appeal must be filed
pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17, with the Hampshire
County Superior Court or the Northampton District Court and
notice of said appeal filed with the City Clerk within twenty
days (20) of the date of that this decision was filed with the
City Clerk.
Applicant: Margaret, Nancy and John Hughes
478 Coles Meadow Road
DECISION DATE: AUGJUST 17, 1994
DECISION FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: AWRIST 31 1994 T
M. Sanford eil, Jr.
J
William V. B dt
�X
Alex Ghisel.in
ATTACHMENT A
- Water Supply Protection District
SPECIAL PERMIT for:
478 Coles Meadow Road
In Granting the Special Permit, the Zoning Board of Appeals found
that the requested use meets all special regulations set forth in
the Zoning ordinance, specifically Section 16.7 (C) (1) (a-e) -
Uses by Special Permit.
In making this decision, the Zoning Board of Appeals found:
a. The use is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
by-law and will promote the purposes of the water Supply
Protection District because:
The amended plan shows a large parcel (15. 8 acres) , and the
requested use for development of a residential structure is
the least offensive use for the property.
b. The use is appropriate to the natural topography, soils and
other characteristics of the site to be developed because:
The area of the parcel to be developed in relation to the
overall size of the parcel will not be changed dramatically,
from the original plan approved by the Board.
C. The applicants have shown that the use has suitable soil for
on-site sewerage and water supply systems.
d. The use will not, during construction or thereafter, have an
adverse environmental impact on groundwater resources in the
district because: -
Prior to construction, the applicant has proposed to take
the necessary precautions to assure that no adverse
environmental impact on groundwater resources occurs, and
after construction, when the land has revegetated, the
disturbances shall be minimal.
e. The use will not adversely affect the existing or the
potential quality or quantity of water in the Water Supply
Protection District because:
The use will not increase the quantity of water consumed and
should cause no adverse affect on the quality of water.
4
-3-
Hughes -SP
2. Any future increases in lot coverage must be approved by the
Zoning Board of Appeals. Any future changes to the plans
that result in a decreased area of impervious cover, does
not require approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
3 . If future changes are made that result in a decrease in
impervious coverage, an "As-Built" plan must be submitted to
the Office of Planning & Development, to become part of the
file.
4 . All previous findings and permit conditions, not amended by
permit conditions # 1,2,3, listed above, shall remain in
effect and become part of the amended permit.
3
-2-
Hughes - SP
4. The requested use will not overload any public water,
drainage or sewer system, or any other municipal system to
such an extent that the requested use or any developed use
in the immediate area or in any other area of the City will
be unduly subjected to hazards affecting health safety or
the general welfare, because the use will not utilize public
water or sewers, as a private well and septic system will be
installed as per the regulations of the water Supply
Protection District.
5. The requested use meets all special regulations set forth in
the Zoning Ordinance, specifically Sections 16.7 (C) (1) (a-
e) , see "Attachment A", for criteria.
6. The requested use will not unduly impair the integrity of
character of the district or adjoining zones nor will it be
detrimental to the health, morals, or general welfare and
the use will be in harmony with the general purpose and
intent of the Ordinance because the underlying zoning
district is Rural Residential, in which single family
dwellings are allowed by right, with additional conditions
added, and the size of the parcel and the reduction of the
development under the amended plan are in keeping with the
character of the zone and will protect the zone more
effectively, than if the parcel were developed more
intensely.
In reviewing the site Plan, submitted with the Special Permit,
the Planning Board:
1. Voted Grant the waivers as requested.
conditions imposed upon the project are as follows:
1. Development shall be done in accordance with the amended
plans submitted with the Special Permit entitled and dated:
Topographic survey, Coles Meadow Road, for the Hughes
Family; at a scale of 1"=20' ; dated 8/3/94; Prepared by
Bruce Salak & Assoc. , Inc. 576- Boston Post Road, Marlboro,
MA 01752 .
2
City of Northampton, Massachusetts -_ -� .-- �.,_ - 0 rO,y
_Office of Planning and Development } $
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 - (413) 586-6950 `,
FAX (413) 586-3726 u I 6•Community and Economic Development { �t
•Conservation -Historic Preservation DEPT U��?t�li plraG INSPECTiJt�S
•Planning Board•Zoning Board of Appeals l(f'El ILDI G INS O1Q ff s�
•Northampton Parking Commission
DECISION OF
NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICANT: MARGARET, NANCY AND JOHN HUGHES
ADDRESS: P O BOX 9, DEER ISLE, MAINE 04627
OWNER: GEORGE W. PAGE, JR.
ADDRESS: 158 CENTRAL PARR DRIVE, HOLYOKE, MA 01040
RE LAND OR BUILDINGS IN NORTHAMPTON AT:
MAP AND PARCEL NUMBERS:
At a meeting conducted on August 17, 1994 the Northampton Zoning
Board of Appeals unanimously voted 3 • e ue
Margaret, Na Hu hes
rovisions
"Oection 16.-7. a e - e or am ton Zonin Ordinance,
Zoning Board Members present and voting were: Vice-Chairman M.
Sanford Weil, Jr. , Member Alex Ghiselin, and Associate Member
William Brandt.
In Granting the Special Permit, the Zoning Board of Appeals
found:
1. The requested use for construction of a single family
dwelling in the Water Supply Protection District is listed
as a Special Permit in Section 16.7 of this Ordinance.
`tom j 2. The requested use bears a positive relationship to public
convenience or welfare because the amended plan continues to
encourage a low impact use of the property, for residential
purposes and includes protective measures to avoid impacts
on waster supply resources, as outlined in Section 16 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
3 . The requested use will not create undue traffic congestion
or unduly impair pedestrian safety because the development
of the property for residential purposes will generate a
smaller amount of traffic than any other use, except
agricultural uses, allowed in the zoning district.
1
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER