The URL can be used to link to this page

23B-046 (239) Maintenance > The contractor or subcontractor will be responsible for implementing each control shown on the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. In accordance with EPA regulations,the contractor must sign a copy of a certification to verify that a plan has been prepared and that permit regulations are understood. > The on-site contractor will inspect all sediment and erosion control structures periodically and after each rainfall event.Records of the inspections will be prepared and maintained on-site by the contractor. Silt shall be removed from behind barriers if greater than 6-inches deep or as needed. > Damaged or deteriorated items will be repaired immediately after identification- >- The underside of hay bales should be kept in close contact with the earth and reset as necessary. > Sediment that is collected in structures shall be disposed of properly and covered if stored on-site. > Erosion control structures shall remain in place until all disturbed earth has been securely stabilized.After removal of structures,disturbed areas shall be regraded and stabilized as necessary. Mr 40 OF P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc .............................................................................................................................................................................................. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Techniques The following recommended erosion and sedimentation controls will be employed during the earthwork and construction phases of the project.The following controls are provided as recommendations for the site contractor and do not constitute or replace the final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan that must be implemented by the Contractor in Compliance with EPA NPDES regulations. Hay Bale Barriers Hay bale barriers will be placed to trap sediment transported by runoff before it reaches the drainage system or leaves the construction site.Bales will be set at least four inches into the existing ground to minimize undercutting by runoff. Silt Fencing In areas where high runoff velocities or high sediment loads are expected,hay bale barriers will be backed up with silt fencing. This semi-permeable barrier made of a synthetic porous fabric will provide additional protection.The silt fences and hay bale barrier will be replaced as determined by periodic field inspections. Catch Basin Protection Newly constructed and existing catch basins will be protected with hay bale barriers w (where appropriate)or silt sacks throughout construction. Gravel and Construction Entrance/Exit A temporary crushed-stone construction entrance/exit will be constructed.A cross slope will be placed in the entrance to direct runoff to a protected catch basin inlet or settling area. If deemed necessary after construction begins,a wash pad may be included to wash off vehicle wheels before leaving the project site. P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc on Appendix C: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc W Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfal1=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 9 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/312004 Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.99" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 92.61 cfs@ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 270,301 cf Outflow = 80.96 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 255,354 cf, Atten= 13 0/g Lag= 2.5 min Primary = 80.96 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 255,354 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 183.15'@ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 9,840 sf Storage=37,544 cf Plug-Flow detention time=38.4 min calculated for 254,506 cf(94% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=18.8 min ( 794.3 -775.6 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 37,544 cf Custom Stage Data (Pyramidal)sted below x 1.2 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area _(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 177.00 2,000 0 0 2,000 178.00 3,000 2,483 2,483 3,020 u . 179.00 4,350 3,654 6,137 4,391 180.00 5,350 4,841 10,979 5,429 181.00 6,300 5,819 16,797 6,427 182.00 7,250 6,769 23,567 7,432 183.00 8,200 7,720 31,287 8,445 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei?=2.56 Primary OutFlowMax=78.21 cfs@ 12.12 hrs HW=183.08' (Free Discharge) L1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei(Weir Controls 78.21 cfs @ 5.3 fps) �w ON Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here) Page 8 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 qx Reach 21R: Off Site-SS Inflow Area = 61,732 sf, Inflow Depth = 5.69" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 8.95 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 29,285 cf Outflow = 8.95 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 29,285 cf, Atten= 01/ Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs w Proposed Type ///24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfal1=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 20R: Wetland 2 Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.77" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 80.96 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 255,354 cf Outflow = 80.96 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 255,354 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs .A �w • Proposed Type I// 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 10R: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 sf, Inflow Depth = 4.74" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 cf Outflow = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min '"" Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ■ Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 21 S: Parking Structure Runoff = 8.95 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 29,285 cf, Depth= 5.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 53,680 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 61,732 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description .■ _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Proposed Type ///24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 4 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/312004 Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff = 92.61 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 270,301 cf, Depth= 3.99" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" _ Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B Ow 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 89,814 98 Paved parking & roofs No 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 99,979 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 104,000 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 812,192 81 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minumum Proposed Type 111 24-hr Hamps-900 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 3 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 ct Depth= 4.74" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking& roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fVft) (fVsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum A. ON OW MR Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 2 H droCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=4.74" Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf w. Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=812,192 sf Runoff Depth=3.99" Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=92.61 cfs 270,301 cf no Subcatchment 21S: Parking Structure Runoff Area=61,732 sf Runoff Depth=5.69" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=8.95 cfs 29,285 cf no Reach 1OR:Wetland 1 Inflow=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf Outflow=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf Reach 20R: Wetland 2 Inflow=80.96 cfs 255,354 cf Outflow=80.96 cfs 255,354 cf Reach 21 R: Off Site-SS Inflow=8.95 cfs 29,285 cf Outflow=8.95 cfs 29,285 cf a. Pond 1P: Basin Peak Elev=183.15' Storage=37,544 cf Inflow=92.61 cfs 270,301 cf Outflow=80.96 cfs 255,354 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,234,734 sf Runoff Volume = 442,027 cf Average Runoff Depth =4.30" 100-Year Storm Event- Proposed .w I 10 P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.d oc OM MO Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 17 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 g Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.38" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 55.73 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 161,013 cf Outflow = 47.21 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 148,867 cf, Atten= 15 1/q Lag= 3.3 min Primary = 47.21 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 148,867 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 182.29'@ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 7,526 sf Storage=25,866 cf ,. Plug-Flow detention time=44.8 min calculated for 148,867 cf(92% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=19.1 min ( 806.8 -787.7 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 31,350 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismati )sted below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store PW (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 177.00 2,000 0 0 178.00 3,000 2,500 2,500 no 179.00 4,350 3,675 6,175 180.00 5,350 4,850 11,025 181.00 6,300 5,825 16,850 182.00 7,250 6,775 23,625 183.00 8,200 7,725 31,350 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap We&=2.56 Primary OutFlowMax=46.38 cfs@ 12.13 hrs HW=182.27' (Free Discharge) t--1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei(Weir Controls 46.38 cfs @ 4.6 fps) �.. Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 16 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 21R: Off Site-SS Inflow Area = 61,732 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.96" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 6.27 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 20,387 cf Outflow = 6.27 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 20,387 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs ■ PW WX Proposed Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 15 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 go Reach 20R: Wetland 2 go Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.20" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 47.21 cfs@ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 148,867 cf Outflow = 47.21 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 148,867 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min we Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs OM an Wa �w Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 14 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 1OR: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.01" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf Outflow = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs e. I'M Proposed Type 111 24-hr Hamps-90 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 13 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/312004 Subcatchment 21 S: Parking Structure Runoff = 6.27 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 20,387 cf, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 53,680 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 61,732 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-90 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 12 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/312004 Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff = 55.73 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 161,013 cf, Depth= 2.38" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 89,814 98 Paved parking & roofs .. 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 99,979 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 104,000 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 812,192 81 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minumum on Proposed Type Ill 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 11 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf, Depth= 3.01" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking & roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A w. 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average ON Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fVsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Proposed Type Ill 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 10 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=3.01" Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf go Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=812,192 sf Runoff Depth=2.38" Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=55.73 cfs 161,013 cf Subcatchment 21S: Parking Structure Runoff Area=61,732 sf Runoff Depth=3.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=6.27 cfs 20,387 cf Reach 10R: Wetland 1 Inflow=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf Outflow=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf Reach 20R: Wetland 2 Inflow=47.21 cfs 148,867 cf Outflow=47.21 cfs 148,867 cf "" Inflow=6.27 cfs 20,387 cf Reach 21 R: Off Site-SS Outflow=6.27 cfs 20,387 cf Pond 1P: Basin Peak Elev=182.29' Storage=25,866 cf Inflow=55.73 cfs 161,013 cf Outflow=47.21 cfs 148,867 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,234,734 sf Runoff Volume = 271,956 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.64" on 10-Year Storm Event- Proposed P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc Proposed Type Ill 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfal1=3.00" Prepared by{enter your company name here) Page 9 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/312004 Pond 1P: Basin Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 28.49 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 82,139 cf Outflow = 21.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 70,327 cf, Atten= 24% Lag= 4.6 min Primary = 21.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 70,327 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 181.43'@ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 6,707 sf Storage= 19,753 cf Plug-Flow detention time=68.4 min calculated for 70,327 cf(86% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=25.8 min ( 828.8 - 802.9 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 31,350 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatid)sted below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 177.00 2,000 0 0 178.00 3,000 2,500 2,500 179.00 4,350 3,675 6,175 180.00 5,350 4,850 11,025 181.00 6,300 5,825 16,850 182.00 7,250 6,775 23,625 183.00 8,200 7,725 31,350 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weil=2.56 Primary OutFlowMax=21.40 cfs@ 12.16 hrs HW=181.42' (Free Discharge) t-1=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei('Weir Controls 21.40 cfs @ 3.7 fps) Proposed Type Ill 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems _ 6/3/2004 W Reach 21 R: Off Site-SS Inflow Area = 61,732 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.59 for Hamps-02 event ON Inflow = 4.15 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 13,325 cf Outflow = 4.15 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 13,325 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min W Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs �w +e. go Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 20R: Wetland 2 Inflow Area = 812,192 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.04" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 21.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 70,327 cf Outflow = 21.71 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 70,327 cf, Atten= 0°/a Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 10R: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.70" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 17.62 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf Outflow = 17.62 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf, Atten= 0°/a Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs PM �w Proposed Type 11124-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 21 S: Parking Structure Runoff = 4.15 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 13,325 cf, Depth= 2.59" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area (so CN Description 53,680 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,684 98 Paved parking & roofs w 61,732 98 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description P. (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum M O• Proposed Type 111 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4 HydroCAM 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 20S: Western Side ON Runoff = 28.49 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 82,139 cf, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 89,814 98 Paved parking & roofs 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 99,979 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C ,. 104,000 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 812,192 81 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minumum Proposed Type 111 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfal1=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 17.62 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf, Depth= 1.70" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area (so CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B P• 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking & roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fVft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum PM Proposed Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 2 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=1.70" Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf wo Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=812,192 sf Runoff Depth=1.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=81 Runoff=28.49 cfs 82,139 cf PM Subcatchment 21S: Parking Structure Runoff Area=61,732 sf Runoff Depth=2.59" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=4.15 cfs 13,325 cf ON Reach 10R: Wetland 1 Inflow=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf Outflow=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf Reach 20R: Wetland 2 Inflow=21.71 cfs 70,327 cf Outflow=21.71 cfs 70,327 cf so Inflow=4.15 cfs 13,325 cf Reach 21 R: Off Site-SS Outflow=4.15 cfs 13,325 cf Pond 1 P: Basin Peak Elev=181.43' Storage=19,753 cf Inflow=28.49 cfs 82,139 cf Outflow=21.71 cfs 70,327 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,234,734 sf Runoff Volume = 146,645 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.43" 04 w* 2-Year Storm Event - Proposed P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc MW i0 w r Eastern Side Weste n Side pw Parking f3tructure III. Basin Off Site-SS Wetland 1 Wetland 2 * Su1C� teach, DC3 �ipk Drainage Diagram for Proposed Prepared by tenter your company name here} FHydroCAD�D 6/3/2004 7.00 stn 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10 em HydroCAD Analysis: Proposed Conditions P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-900 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 19 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Pond 1 P: (new Pond) Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 4.20" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 103.08 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 303,292 cf Outflow = 82.88 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 287,858 cf, Atten= 20 1/q Lag= 1.5 min Primary = 82.88 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 287,858 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 183.10'@ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 8,200 sf Storage=28,500 cf �.. Plug-Flow detention time=33.5 min calculated for 287,858 cf(95% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=14.8 min ( 785.9 -771.1 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 28,500 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatid)sted below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store "" (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 177.00 2,000 0 0 178.00 2,500 2,250 2,250 179.00 3,000 2,750 5,000 180.00 4,350 3,675 8,675 181.00 6,300 5,325 14,000 182.00 7,250 6,775 20,775 183.00 8,200 7,725 28,500 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Weld=2.56 2 Primary 183.00' 45.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head(feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlowMax=82.57 cfs@ 12.10 hrs HW=183.10' (Free Discharge) tI=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei(Weir Controls 79.12 cfs @ 5.3 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular We#Weir Controls 3.44 cfs @ 0.8 fps) M Existing Type 111 24-hr Hamps-900 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here) Page 18 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 on Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.99" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 82.88 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 287,858 cf Outflow = 82.88 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 287,858 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs N on on W Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 17 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 1 R: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 sf, Inflow Depth = 4.74" for Hamps-100 event Inflow = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 cf Outflow = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 cf, Atten= 0 1/6, Lag= 0.0 min '" Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Ow +w Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-900 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 16 HydroCAD&7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 ON Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff = 103.08 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 303,292 cf, Depth= 4.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B ■s 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 143,494 98 Paved parking & roofs 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 75,391 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 128,588 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 865,872 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum w. �w • Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 15 HydroCAD9 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 47.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 142,441 cf, Depth= 4.74" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-100 Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking & roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A ,�. 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum M o Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-900 Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 14 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 4M Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS 4. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=4.74" OR Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=865,872 sf Runoff Depth=4.20" Tc=5.0 min CN=83 Runoff=103.08 cfs 303,292 cf ,o Reach 1R: Wetland 1 Inflow=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf Outflow=47.10 cfs 142,441 cf Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow=82.88 cfs 287,858 cf Outflow=82.88 cfs 287,858 cf Pond 1P: (new Pond) Peak EIev=183.10' Storage=28,500 cf Inflow=103.08 cfs 303,292 cf Outflow=82.88 cfs 287,858 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,226,682 sf Runoff Volume = 445,732 cf Average Runoff Depth = 4.36" 100-Year Storm Event - Existing P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 13 H droCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 PM Pond 1 P: (new Pond) Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.55" for Hamps-10 event qM Inflow = 63.39 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 184,114 cf Outflow = 53.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 174,352 cf, Atten= 15 0/g Lag= 3.0 min Primary = 53.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 174,352 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/ 2 Peak Elev= 182.47'@ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 7,699 sf Storage=24,424 cf Plug-Flow detention time=35.1 min calculated for 173,773 cf(94% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=16.3 min ( 799.2 -782.9 ) # Invert Avail Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 28,500 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatid)sted below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 177.00 2,000 0 0 178.00 2,500 2,250 2,250 179.00 3,000 2,750 5,000 180.00 4,350 3,675 8,675 181.00 6,300 5,325 14,000 182.00 7,250 6,775 20,775 183.00 8,200 7,725 28,500 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei?= 2.56 2 Primary 183.00' 45.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head(feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlowMax=52.75 cfs@ 12.13 hrs HW=182.45' (Free Discharge) t1=Sh arp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei('Weir Controls 52.75 cfs @ 4.8 fps) 2=B road-C rested Rectangular Wei(rControls 0.00 cfs) Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 12 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 2.42" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 53.70 cfs@ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 174,352 cf Outflow = 53.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 174,352 cf, Atten= 0% Lag= 0.0 min "" Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 1 R: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 sf, Inflow Depth = 3.01" for Hamps-10 event Inflow = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf Outflow = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf, Atten= OO/A Lag= 0.0 min *" Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs we war �. Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 10 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff = 63.39 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 184,114 cf, Depth= 2.55" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 143,494 98 Paved parking & roofs 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 75,391 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 128,588 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 865,872 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft(ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 9 HydroCAD®7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 30.67 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 90,557 cf, Depth= 3.01" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking & roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum RM w IM ■ Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-10 Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 on Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method am Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=3.01" Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf ON Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=865,872 sf Runoff Depth=2.55" Tc=5.0 min CN=83 Runoff=63.39 cfs 184,114 cf Reach 1R: Wetland 1 Inflow=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf Outflow=30.67 cfs 90,557 cf Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow=53.70 cfs 174,352 cf Outflow=53.70 cfs 174,352 cf Pond 1P: (new Pond) Peak Elev=182.47' Storage=24,424 cf Inflow=63.39 cfs 184,114 c Outflow=53.70 cfs 174,352 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,226,682 sf Runoff Volume = 274,670 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.69 Ow 10-Year Storm Event - Existing P: 09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 on Pond 1 P: (new Pond) FM Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.34" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 33.65 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 96,820 cf Outflow = 27.30 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 87,375 cf, Atten= 19 1/4 Lag= 3.7 min Primary = 27.30 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 87,375 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/2 Peak Elev= 181.64'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 6,912 sf Storage= 18,368 cf Plug-Flow detention time=51.8 min calculated for 87,375 cf(90% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=20.3 min ( 817.9 - 797.6 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 177.00' 28,500 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatid)sted below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sQ-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 177.00 2,000 0 0 178.00 2,500 2,250 2,250 e 179.00 3,000 2,750 5,000 180.00 4,350 3,675 8,675 181.00 6,300 5,325 14,000 182.00 7,250 6,775 20,775 183.00 8,200 7,725 28,500 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 180.00' 45.0 deg x 3.5' long Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap WeO=2.56 2 Primary 183.00' 45.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head(feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 w 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlowMax=27.00 cfs@ 12.14 hrs HW=181.63' (Free Discharge) 11=Sharp-Crested Vee/Trap Wei('Weir Controls 27.00 cfs @ 4.0 fps) 2=Broad-C rested Rectangular WeirControls 0.00 cfs) M Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow Area = 865,872 sf, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 27.30 cfs @ 12.14 hrs Volume= 87,375 cf Outflow = 27.30 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 87,375 cf, Atten= 0°/a Lag= 0.0 min '"' Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs NNW Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Reach 1R: Wetland 1 Inflow Area = 360,810 st Inflow Depth = 1.70" for Hamps-02 event Inflow = 17.62 cfs@ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf Outflow = 17.62 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf, Atten= 0 1/q Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs RM OR Existing Type 111 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 4 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff = 33.65 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 96,820 cf, Depth= 1.34" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area (sf) CN Description 36,764 73 Woods/grass comb., Poor, HSG B 1,788 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 54,106 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 143,494 98 Paved parking & roofs 34,572 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A " 85,906 98 Paved parking & roofs 186,096 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 2,986 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C • 102,911 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 1,450 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 75,391 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 128,588 98 Paved parking & roofs 11,820 77 Brush, Fair, HSG D 865,872 83 Weighted Average Om Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fVft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Existing Type 11124-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 3 HydroCAD®7 00 s/n 001234 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff = 17.62 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 51,180 cf, Depth= 1.70" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area (sf) CN Description 1,778 65 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG B 43,090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 146,648 98 Paved parking & roofs 18,233 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 58,356 76 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG C 21,600 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 4,255 70 Brush, Fair, HSG C 52,797 98 Paved parking & roofs 1,079 76 Gravel roads, HSG A 763 43 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG A 2,827 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 9,384 98 Paved parking & roofs 360,810 88 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Existing Type /// 24-hr Hamps-02 Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 6/3/2004 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10S: Eastern Side Runoff Area=360,810 sf Runoff Depth=1.70" Tc=5.0 min CN=88 Runoff=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf Subcatchment 20S: Western Side Runoff Area=865,872 sf Runoff Depth=1.34" Tc=5.0 min CN=83 Runoff=33.65 cfs 96,820 cf Reach 1R: Wetland 1 Inflow=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf Outflow=17.62 cfs 51,180 cf g. Reach 2R: Wetland 2 Inflow=27.30 cfs 87,375 cf Outflow=27.30 cfs 87,375 cf MR Pond 1P: (new Pond) Peak Elev=181.64' Storage=18,368 cf Inflow=33.65 cfs 96,820 cf Outflow=27.30 cfs 87,375 cf Total Runoff Area = 1,226,682 sf Runoff Volume = 148,000 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.45" 2-Year Storm Event - Existing P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc go to oS .... ...o Eastern Side Weste n Side .._...... ............. ............................... ............................... (new ond) Nt7 Wetland 1 2 Wetland 2 { m �.t Drainage Diagram for Existing S Rah tl{fi Prepared by{enter your company name here} 6/3/2004 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 ©1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems on Appendix B: HydroCAD Analysis P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc 172 TABLE 17.--CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOILS Soil name ; Family or higher taxonomic class 1 1 i Agawam--------------------; Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Amostown------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Belgrade------------------; Coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Aquic Dystric Eutrochrepts Boxford-------------------; Fine, mixed, mesic Aquic Dystric Eutrochrepts Charlton------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Deerfield----------------=; Mixed, mesic Aquic Udipsamments 04 Enosburg------------------; Sandy over loamy, mixed, nonacid, mesic Mollic Haplaquents Freetown------------------; Dysic, mesic Typic Medisaprists Gloucester----------------; Sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Hadley--------------------; Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Udifluvents Haven---------------------; Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Hinckley------------------; Sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Udorthents Hollis--------------------; Loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrepts Holyoke-------------------; Loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrepts Limerick------------------1 Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Fluvaquents Maybid--------------------; Fine, illitic, nonacid, mesic Typic Humaquepts Merrimac------------------; Sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Montauk-------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts *Narragansett--------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Ninigret------------------; Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Aquic Dystrochrepts Paxton--------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts Pollux--------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts *Pootatuck-----------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Raynham-------------------; Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aeric Haplaquepts Ridgebury-----------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts *Rippowam------------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aeric Fluvaquents Saco----------------------; Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Fluvaquentic Humaquepts Scarboro------------------; Sandy, mixed, mesic Histic Humaquepts Scitico-------------------; Fine, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Haplaquepts Scituate---------------- -i Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts Sudbury-------------------; Sandy, mixed, mesic Aquic Dystrochrepts Suncook-------------------; Mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamments Swansea-------------------i Sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, dysic, mesic Terric Medisaprists Walpole-------------------; Sandy, mixed, mesic Aeric Haplaquepts Wethersfield--------------; Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts, Whitman-------------------i Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Humic Fragiaquepts Windsor-------------------; Mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamments Winooski------------------; Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aquic Udifluvents Woodbridge----------------i Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts * The soil is a taxadjunet to the series. See text for a description of those characteristics of the soil that are outside the range of the series. e U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.1981-336-68611059 00 up #rABL- .).--S.,-..IND 4v. A FEA,v,n3--Cunt.Aued ' w Flooding 1 High water table ! Bedrock ; Risk of corrosion � Soil name and ;Hydro-1 , —T T--�— !Potential; T -- U , group map symbol ! logic; Frequency 1 Duration !Months ; Depth 1 Kind !Months 1 Depth !Hardness! frost !Uncoated ;Concrete ' ' ' ' ' action ' steel ! m , , , , , n , , i 0 Sb**--------------! D !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 +1-1 .O1ApparentlJan-Dec; >60 ! --- !High-----!High-----!High. Scarboro --------- Sc------- ; C ;None--------! --- ! --- ! 0-1.0lApparentlNov-May! >60 ! --- !High-----;High-----;Moderate. U) Scitico 0 SgB, ShB, ShC-----1 C !None--------1 --- ! --- 11.5-3.0!Perched !Nov-May! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!High. c N Scituate , , Sr A, SrB----------1 B !None--------1 --- 1 --- 11.5-3.01Apparent!Dec-Apr! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!High. En Sudbury , 0 CD , , , , Su----------------, A ,Common------,Brief-----,Mar-May,4.0-6.O,Apparent,Jan-Apr, >60 , --- !Low------,Low------,!High. � Suncook Sw----------------1 D ;None--------1 --- ! --- ! 0-1.0!Apparent!Jan-Dec; >60 1 --- !High-----!High-----!High. Swansea UdorthentS Wa----------------! C ;None--------! --- ! --- ! 0-1.0lApparentlNov-Apr! >60 ! --- ;High-----;Low------;High. Walpole WeR, WeC, WfB, WfC, WgB, WgC----! C !None--------! --- ! --- 11.5-2.51Perched !Feb-Mar! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------;Moderate. Wethersfield ! ! WhA**-------------! D ;None--------1 --- ! --- 1 +1-0.51Perched !Sep-Jun! >60 ! --- ;High-----!High-----!High. Whitman WnA, WnB, WnC, WnD--------------! A !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ! --- 1 >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------;High. Windsor WoA, WoB, WoC-----1 A !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- 1 --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. Windsor Wp*: ! ! Windsor----------1 A !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. Scitico----------1 C !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 0-1.0lApparentlNov-May! >60 ! --- !High-----!High-----!Moderate. Amostown---------1 C !None--------1 --- ! --- 11.5-3.0!ApperentlDec-Apr! >60 ! --- !Moderate ;Moderate !Moderate. Ws----------------1 B !Occasional !Brief-----!Feb-Apr! 1.5-3.O1ApparentlNov-Apr! >60 1 --- !High-----!Moderate !Moderate. Winooski ' Wt A, WtB, Wt C, WvB, WvC, WxB, ! ! ! ! ! ! WxC, WxD---------1 C !None--------1 --- ! --- 11.5-3.0!Perched !Nov-May! >60 ! --- !High-----!Low------!Moderate. Woodbridge * See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit. ** In the "High water table--Depth" column, a plus sign preceding the range in depth indicates that the water table is above the surface of the soil. The first numeral in the range indicates how high the water rises above the surface. The second -+ v numeral indicates the depth below the surface. --• TABLE 16.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued -4 0 1 1 Flooding , High water table , Bedrock , , Risk of corrosion Soil name and ;Hydro-1-- , , , , I !Potential , map symbol logic! Frequency ; Duration !Months ; Depth 1 Kind {Months 1 Depth :Hardness! frost !Uncoated ;Concrete group action 1 steel 1 1 I ' *, NaD*: NaC Rock outcrop: I I 1 1 I i I 1 NgA, NgB----------1 B :None--------: --- { --- 11.5-3.01ApparentlNov-Apri >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!High. Ninigret , Pa B, Pa C, PaD, PbB, PbC, PbD, I 1 PeB, PeC, PcD, PcE-------------- ! ! ! 11.5-2.5!Perched !Feb-Mar, >60 --- ,Moderate !Low------!Moderate. I C ,None-------- --- _-- 1 I ; 1 1 Paxton Pd*: Paxton-----------I C :None--------: --- : --- 11.5-2.5{Perched !Feb-Mari >60 { --- !Moderate !Low------!Moderate. I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 Charlton---------1 B !None-------- --- i --- i >6:0 { --- { --- i >60 { --- Mow------Mow------!High. Urban land. I 1 P *. Pits I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 PuA, PuB, PuC-----I C :None--------: --- ! _-_ ! >6.0 ! --- : --- ! >60 1 --- !Moderate !Low------!High. Pollux , I I I I I I I 1 I I Pv----------------' B !Frequent----!Brief-----:Nov-Apr11.5-3.0{ApparentlNov-Apr: >60 ! --- !Moderate :Moderate :Moderate. Pootatuck I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 Qu*' Quarries I 1 1 1 I f 1 I 1 1 I 1 Ra----------------! C !None--------{ --- : --- 10.5-2.01Apparent!Nov-May! >60 : --- :High-----!High-----!Moderate. Raynham I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 RdA, RdB, ReA, ReA--------------I C !None--------1 --- : --- 1 0-1.51Perched :Nov-May! >60 i --- !High-----!High-----!High. Rid ebur g Y 1 I I I I I ---------� Rm------- ! C !Frequent----!Brief-----!Nov-Apri 0-1 .5iApparentlNov-May: >60 : --- !High-----!High-----!High. Rippowam : ! I 1 Ro*. Rock outcrop I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I RoC*, RoE*• Rock outcrop. 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 --- I --- ' 1 --- I --- 1 >60 I I I , arragansett-----, B ,None--------, , , >6.0 , --- ,Moderate ,Low------,Moderate. I ! 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 Holyoke----------1 C/D !None--------1 --- i --- { >6.0 1 --- i --- 1 10-20 :Hard !Moderate :Low------!High. I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I Sa----------------! D !Frequent----:Brief-----!Nov-May! 0-0.5{Apparent{Sep-Jun! >60 : --- !High-----!Low------:Moderate. Saco I 1 1 1 1 , I 1 , I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 0 N C See footnote at end of table. z m z TABLE 16.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued w 3 v _ Flooding High_ ---------wa table Bedrock _, ! Risk of corrosion Soil name and ,Hydro-, , , , , �— , , ;Potential; ; � map symbol ! logic! Frequency ; Duration !Months ; Depth ; Kind !Months ! Depth !Hardness! frost !Uncoated !Concrete (D r , , !group i i T_ ; i i i action i steel i_ o t In ---------! Fm------- ; D ;None--------; --- ; --- ; 0-1 ,OlApparentlJan-Dee; >60 ; --- ;High-----;High--..---;High. " Freetown U) i , , , , i , , i i , , GfB, GfC, GhB, i i i i , , , , , , , N, GhC, GxB, GXC, GxD--------------1 A (None--------1 --- { --- ! >6.0 ! --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- lLOw------;LOW------lHlgh. C W Gloucester , , m Ha----------------1 B ;Occasional !Brief-----!Feb-Aprl4.0-6.0;ApparentlNov-Apr; >60 ! --- !High-----;Low------!Moderate. Hadley n(D Hadley ' B !Occasional !Brief-----;Feb-A rl4.0-6.0!A parent!Nov-A r; >60 ; --- ;High-----!Low------;Moderate. '- Winooski---------1 B !Occasional !Brief-----!Feb-Aprl1.5-3.0!ApparentlNov-Apr; >60 ; --- !High-----!Moderate ;Moderate. a Urban land. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HfB, HfC----------; B !None--------! --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ; --- 1 >60 1 --- !Moderate !Low------!High. Haven Hg A, HgB, HgC, HgD, HgE---------1 A !None--------1 --- 1 --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ! --- i >60 i --- !Low------!Low------!High. Hinckley Hinckley---------1 A !None--------1 --- 1 --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ! --- ! >60 ; --- !Low------!Low------!High. , --- ' --- 1 --- ! --- 1 >60 , Merrimac---------, A ,None--------, , , >6.0 , , --- Mow------!Low------,High. Urban land. HvC---------------1 C/D !None--------1 --- 1 --- ! >6.0 1 --- ! --- 1 10-20 ;Hard ;Moderate ;Low------!High. Holyoke Lk----------------1 C !Frequent----l Brief-----!Jan-Jun!0.5-1.5!ApparentlNov-Jung >60 ! --- !High-----!High-=---!Low. Limerick Ma**--------------1 D !None--------! --- ! --- 1 +1-0.5lApparent!Oct-Aug; >60 ! --- !High-----!High-----!Moderate. Maybld ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MeA, MeB, MeC, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MeD--------------1 A !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 ! --- ! ! >60 , --- � --- ,Low------,Low------,High. Merrimac MoB, MoC, MSC, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MxB, MxC, MxD----1 C ;None--------1 --- ! --- 12.0-2.51Perched !Feb-May! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!High. Montauk NaC*, NaD*: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Narragansett-----! B !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- 1 --- 1 >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!Moderate. Holyoke----------1 C/D !None--------! --- ! --- ! >6.0 1 -=- ! --- 1 10-20 !Hard !Moderate !Low------!High. See footnotes at end of table. 0) cD J TABLE 16.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES O) 00 ["Flooding" and "water table" and terms such as "rare," "brief," "apparent," and "perched" are explained in the text. The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern] I Flooding High water table ; Bedrock , ,_Risk of corrosion Soil name and ;Hydro-!- , , , ;Potential; _T map symbol 1 logic! Frequency ; Duration !Months 1 Depth 1 Kind !Months ; Depth !Hardness! frost ;Uncoated !Concrete 1 1 ! ! I !group , , ! action ; steel 1 1 1 I I I 1 I In I I I I AgA, AgB, AgC-----j B !None--------! --- ! --- 1 >6.0 --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. Agawam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! AmA, AmB----------! C !None--------! --- ! --- 11.5-3.0lApparentiDec-Apr! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Moderate !Moderate. Amostown ; 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 I I 1 I AU*: ! ! Amostown---------! C !None--------! --- ! --- 11.5-3.0!Apparent!Dec-Apr! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Moderate !Moderate. I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I Windsor----------1 A !None--------! --- ! --- 1 >6.0 ! --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. Urban land. I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I f I I I I 1 f 1 1 BaA, BaB----------! B !None--------1 --- 1 --- 11.5-3.5!ApparentlNov-Apr; >60 ! --- !High-----!Moderate ;Moderate. Belgrade 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I i I I I I I I 1 I BoA, BoB, BoC-----1 C !None--------! --- ! --- 11.5-3.01ApparentlNov-Apr! >60 1 --- !High-----!High-----!Moderate. Boxford 1 r r I r 1 1 r 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 CkB, CkC, CmB, CmC, CnB, CnC, CnD--------------1 B !None--------! --- ! --- ! >6.0 ! --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. Charlton 1 1 I 1 I 1 f 1 i f 1 1 r 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I i I 1 1 I I CoE*: ! ! Charlton---------1 B ;None--------1 --- ! --- ! >6.0 ! --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. I 1 I 1 1 I Gloucester-------1 A !None--------1 --- 1 --- 1 >6.0 1 --- 1 --- ! >60 ! --- Mow------Mow------!High. I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 CpC*, CpD*: ! ! Charlton---------1 B !None--------1 --- ! --- 1 >6.0 1 --- ! --- ! >60 ! --- !Low------!Low------!High. I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I I 1 Hollis-----------1 C/D !None--------! --- ! --- ! >6.0 ! --- ! --- 1 10-20 !Hard !Moderate !Low------!High. 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 CrC*, CrE*: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Charlton---------! B !None--------! --- ! --- 1 >6.0 ! --- ! --- 1 >60 ! --- Mow------!Low------!High. 1 I I I 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 i I i I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rock outcrop. 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I Hollis-----------1 C/D !None--------! --- ! --- ! >6.0 ! --- ! --- 1 10-20 !Hard !Moderate !Low------!High. 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I DeA---------------1 B !None--------! --- ! --- 11.5-3.0!Apparent!Dec-Apr! >60 ! --- !Moderate !Low------!Nigh. Deerfield 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 Du*. 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dumps ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! EsA, EsB----------1 D !None--------! --- ! --- 1 0-1.0!Apparent!Nov-May! >60 1 --- !Moderate !High-----!Moderate. �n 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I V+ Enosburg 0 — I c See footnote at end of table. co �c W go 166 Soil survey TABLE 15.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--Continued : : : ; ! ; Erosion 1 lit Soil name and ;Depth; Clay 1 Moist' !Permeability ;Available; Soil ;Shrink-swell 1 factors ; Organic map symbol ; ; ; bulk ; 1 water ;reaction' otential '-T-' p , , 1 matter 1 ; ; density ;capacity 1 : 1 K T ; n Pct cm n r in/in p c MR Pg*• Pits I i I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I PuA, PuB, PuC----: 0-4 1 4-10 11.00-1.20; 2.0-6.0 10.11-0.16;4.5-7.3 !Low----------;0.28; 3 1 2-5 Pollux ; 4-30; 4-10 ;1.20-1.50; 2.0-6.0 10.12-0.15!4.5-6.0 !Low----------;0.28! 1 130-601 2-15 11.30-1.60; 0.06-0.6 ;0.16-0.2114.5-7.3 !Low----------;0.64; e 1 1 1 1 Pv---------------1 0-10; 2-6 11.10-1.351 0.6-6.0 10.11-0.24;4.5-6.5 !!Low----------;0.20; 3 1 2-6 Pootatuck 110-341 1-6 ; 1.20-1.45; 0.6-6.0 ;0.09-0.1814.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.20; 134-601 0-2 ;1.25-1.50; >6.o 10.01-0.1314.5-6.5 !Low----------!0.171 : I I I I I QU* Quarries Ra---------------1 0-10; 3-16 ;1.20-1.50; 0.6-2.0 10.20-0.3015.1-7.3 ;Low----------!0.491 3 1 3-10 Raynham 110-371 3-16 11.20-1.501 0.2-2.0 10.18-0.2615.1-7.3 !Low----------10.64; : 137-60; 3-16 11.20-1.50; 0.06-0.2 10.18-0.2215.6-7.8 !Low----------;0.64; ; RdA, RdB---------1 0-2 ; 3-10 11.00-1.301 0.6-6.0 ;0.06-0.2414.5-6.0 !Low----------;0.24; 3 1 4-7 Ridgebury 1 2-151 2-8 11.60-1.901 0.6-6.0 10.04-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------10.32! ! 115-601 2-8 11.80-2.00! <0.2 ;0.01-0.05!4.5-6.0 !Low----------;0.24! ReA, ReB---------; 0-2 ! 3-10 11.00-1.301 0.6-6.0 10.06-0.2114.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.20! 3 1 4-7 Ridgebury ; 2-15; 2-8 11.60-1.90; 0.6-6.0 10.04-0.2014.5-6.0 ;Low----------;0.32; ; ; 15-60: 2-8 11.80-2.001 <0.2 ;0.01-0.05:4.5-6.0 !Low----------10.241 I 1 ! 1 I : I : ; Rm---------------1 0-5 ; 2-6 ; 1.10-1.35: 0.6-6.0 :0.11-0.2414.5-6.5 !Low----------:0.20; 3 1 3-8 Rippowam 1 5-241 1-6 11.20-1.451 0.6-6.0 10.09-0.1814.5-6.5 !Low----------10.20! ! 124-601 0-2 11.25-1.501 >6.0 10.01-0.1314.5-6.5 !Low----------10.171 ! !� Ro*• Rock outcrop 1 I i I I 1 1 I I t I 1 I I 1 I I I I I RoC*, RoE*: Rock outcrop. Narragansett----: 0-131 3-10 :1.00-1.25; 0.6-2.0 10.13-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.32: 3 1 2-5 113-311 3-10 :1.35-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.431 ! 131-601 2-6 11.40-1.601 2.0-20.0 10.02-0.1214.5-6.0 ;Low----------10.281 : No Holyoke---------1 0-4 1 1-8 11.10-1 .251 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.2213.6-6.0 :Low----------10.20! 2 1 2-5 1 4-16; 1-8 11.30-1.55; 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.2213.6-6.0 !Low----------!0.431 1 1 I I I i 1 I ------------1 I I 16 Sa---------------1 0-121 4-10 11.00-1 .401 0.6-2.0 10.17-0.3015.1-6.5 !Low----------10.491 5 : 3-20 Saco 112-441 2-10 11.20-1.501 0.6-2.0 :0.15-0.2615.1-6.5 fLow----------:0.641 : 144-601 1-8 11.30-1.60! >6.0 10.01-0.1315.6-7.3 !Low----------10.101 : Sb---------------1 5-0 ; --- 10.55-0.75; 6.0-20.0 10.20-0.4514.5-6.0 !Low----------;----; 5 f --- Scarboro 1 0-8 1 1-7 11.00-1.201 >6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------10.171 : : 8-60: 0-2 11.35-1.551 >6.0 10.02-0.1314.5-6.0 !Low----------10.10! : Sc---------------1 0-101 10-40 11.05-1 .251 0.2-2.0 10.14-0.30!5.1-7.3 !Low----------10.49! 3 1 2-7 Scitico 110-361 20-60 11.40-1.701 <0.2 10.11-0.2115.1-7.3 !Moderate-----;0.43; ; 136-601 35-60 11.50-1.751 <0.2 10.09-0.2115.6-7.3 :Moderate-----10.281 : SgB--------------; 0-4 1 4-10 11.00-1.30: 2.0-6.0 10.11-0.2113.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 3 1 2-6 Scituate 1 4-211 2-9 11.25-1.501 2.0-6.0 10.09-0.1613.6-6.0 ;Low----------10.241 ! 121-601 2-9 : 1.75-2.051 0.06-0.2 10.01-0.0713.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.24; I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 ShB, ShC---------1 0-4 1 4-10 11.00-1 .301 2.o-6.o 10.08-0.1513.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.17; 3 1 2-6 Scituate 1 4-211 2-9 11.25-1.501 2.0-6.0 10.09-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.24; : :21-601 2-9 : 1.75-2.051 0.06-0.2 :0.01-0.0713.6-6.0 :Low----------!0.241 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I SrA, SrB---------1 0-101 2-6 11.10-1 .401 2.0-6.0 :0.10-0.25:3.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.241 3 1 2-6 Sudbury 110-161 2-7 11.15-1.451 2.0-6.0 10.07-0.1813.6-6.0 fLow----------;0.24; f 116-281 0-4 ; 1.25-1.45; 2.0-20 10.01-0.1513.6-6.0 :Low----------!0.171 1 128-601 0-3 11.30-1.451 6.0-20 10.01-0.0613.6-6.0 !Low----------!0.101 ! See footnote at end of table. Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 165 TABLE 15.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--Continued Erosion 1 Soil name and !Depth! Clay P � Y ! Moist ;Permeability ;Available; Soil ;Shrink-swell ; factors : Organic map symbol ; ; ; bulk ; 1 water !reaction! potential 1------T-i matter density ; !capacity I ; ; K ; T In-I -i Pet em : In/hr 1 in/in T`pH r r -- ivC--------------1 0-4 1 1-8 11.10-1 .251 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.22!3.6-6.0 !Low----------10.20! 2 : 2-5 Holyoke 1 4-161 1-8 11.30-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.2213.6-6.0 :Low----------10.43! ! 1 16 1 --- : --- ! --- ; --- ! --- :-------------l----: ; M,k---------------1 0-121 4-10 11.10-1 .501 0.6-2.0 10.18-0.30;5.1-7.3 !Low----------10.491 3 1 2-5 Limerick 112-201 2-10 11.10-1.501 0.6-2.0 :0.18-0.2615.6-7.3 !Low----------10.491 ; 120-601 1-8 11.20-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.18-0.2515.6-7.3 !Low----------10.491 : Ma---------------1 0-131 20-35 11.00-1.301 0.2-0.6 10.12-0.3015.1-6.0 !Low----------10.321 5 3-10 MW Maybid 113-241 20-55 11.40-1 .601 <0.2 10.09-0.1715.6-7.3 !Moderate-----10.431 ! 124-601 35-55 11.40-1.601 <0.2 10.09-0.1816.1-7.3 !Moderate-----:0.491 ! ! : ! : ; ! : : : : A eA, MeB, MeC, ! ! ! ! : ! : ! ! ; _MeD-------------1 0-161 3-7 11.10-1.20: 2.0-6.0 10.14-0.1913.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 3 1 1-5 Merrimac 116-241 1-4 11.20-1 .401 2.0-6.0 10.14-0.1713.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 1 124-601 0-3 11.30-1.501 >6.0 10.01-0.0613.6-6.0 ;Low----------10.101 ; ,40B, MoC---------1 0-6 1 6-18 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.o 10.16-0.2013.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.321 3 1 2-6 Montauk ; 6-21 ! 6-18 11.30-1.60; 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 ! 121-601 1-18 11.70-1.90; 0.06-0.6 10.02-0.0813.6-6.0 !Low----------10.24; ; 1sC--------------1 0-6 1 6-18 11.00-1.251 o.6-6.o 10.11-0.1513.6-6.0 !Low----------10.17; 3 1 2-6 Montauk 1 6-211 6-18 :1.30-1 .601 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 121-601 1-18 11.70-1.90: 0.06-0.6 10.02-0.16:3.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 ! ! : : : ! : : : : : ixB, MxC, MxD----1 0-6 1 6-18 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.o :0.11-0.1513.6-6.0 !Low----------10.171 3 ; 2-6 Montauk 1 6-21! 6-18 11.30-1.601 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.16:3.6-6.0 !Low----------!0.241 : 121-601 1-18 11.70-1.901 0.06-0.6 :0.02-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.241 1 WfaC*, NaD*: Narragansett----! 0-131 3-10 11.00-1.251 0.6-2.0 10.13-0.2014.5-6.0 :Low----------10.32: 3 1 2-5 :13-311 3-10 11.35-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.20:4.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.431 ! 131-601 2-6 11.40-1 .60: 2.0-20.0 10.02-0.1214.5-6.0 !Low----------10.281 1 ,Holyoke---------1 0-4 1 1-8 11.10-1 .251 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.2213.6-6.0 !Low----------10.201 2 1 2-5 1 4-161 1-8 11.30-1.551 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.2213.6-6.0 !Low----------10.431 1 1 16 ! --- : --- : --- : --- ! --- :-------------:----: : Rock outcrop. gA, Ng B---------1 0-101 3-7 11.00-1.251 2.0-6.0 10.13-0.2514.5-6.0 ;Low----------;0.281 3 1 2-8 Ninigret 110-31 : 3-7 11.35-1.601 2.0-6.0 ;0.06-0.1814.5-6.0 !Low----------10.321 ! 131-601 0-2 11.45-1.701 6.0-20 10.01-0.1314.5-6.0 :Low----------10.101 : pJaB, PaC, PaD----! 0-3 1 3-12 11.00-1 .251 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.23:4.5-6.5 :Low----------10.241 3 1 2-5 Paxton 1 3-261 3-12 11.35-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.06-0.2014.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.321 i 126-601 3-12 11.70-2.001 <0.2 10.05-0.12:4.5-6.5 !Low----------!0.241 : PbB, PbC, PbD----! 0-3 1 3-12 :1.00-1.251 o.6-6.o 10.08-0.2314.5-6.5 !Low----------10.201 3 1 2-5 RaPaxton : 3-26: 3-12 11.35-1 .601 0.6-6.0 10.06-0.2014.5-6.5 !Low----------10.321 1 126-601 3-12 11.70-2.001 <0.2 :0.05-0.1214.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.241 ! PcB, PcC, PCD, PcE-------------: 0-3 : 3-12 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.1514.5-6.5 !Low----------10.201 3 1 2-5 Paxton ! 3-26: 3-12 11.35-1 .601 0.6-6.0 10.06-0.2014.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.32: 126-601 3-12 11.70-2.001 <0.2 :0.05-0.12!4.5-6.5 !Low----------10.24! ! Pd*: Paxton----------1 0-3 1 3-12 11.00-1 .251 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.2314.5-6.5 !Low----------10.24! 3 1 2-5 OR 1 3-261 3-12 11.35-1.601 0.6-2.0 10.06-0.2014.5-6.5 !Low----------10.321 : 126-601 3-12 11.70-2.001 <0.2 10.05-0.1214.5-6.5 !Low----------10.241 : Charlton--------1 0-7 1 3-8 11.00-1 .251 0.6-6.0 10.08-0.2314.5-6.0 ;Low----------;0.241 3 1 2-5 1 7-22! 3-8 11.40-1.651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------10.321 : RM 122-601 1-8 11.45-1.701 0.6-6.o 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 !Low----------10.24! 1 Jrban land. pw See footnote at end of table. 164 Soil survey TABLE 15.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--Continued Erosion , MR Soil name and !Depth; Clay ! Moist ;Permeability !Available! Soil ;Shrink-swell ! factors 1 Organic map symbol ! ! bulk ! 1 water !reaction! potential :��! matter density ! !capacity 1 1 ! K ! T In 1 P_ct cm in/hr j In/In , PH _e ! ! ! ! ! ! P" CrC*, CrE*: ! ! ! Charlton--------1 0-7 1 3-8 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.0 ;0.05-0.1514.5-6.0 !Low----------10.20! 3 1 2-5 1 7-22; 3-8 11.40-1.651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------10.321 ! 122-601 1-8 11.45-1.701 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.16 14.5-6.0 ;Low----------;0.241 ; r I I 1 r Rock outcrop. I I I I I I Hollis----------1 0-5 ! 3-10 11.10-1.401 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.21 14.5-6.0 !Low----------;0.17! 2 1 2-5 ! 5-191 1-8 11.30-1.551 0.6-6.0 10.06-0.18 14.5-6.0 !Low----------;-0.32; 1 - --- ! DeA--------------1 0-9 1 2-7 ;1.00-1.20; 6.0-20 ;0.07-0.13 14.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.171 5 1 1-4 Deerfield 1 9-601 0-5 11.40-1.50; >6.0 10.01-0.0814.5-6.5 :Low----------10.15; ; Du*. ; 1A Dumps EsA, EsB---------1 0-9 ; 1-5 11.20-1.501 6.0-20 10.10-0.1814.5-6.5 !Low----------;0.171 3 1 3-6 Enosburg 1 9-251 1-5 11.30-1.501 6.0-20 10.04-0.0814.5-7.3 !Low----------:0.171 1 ;25-601 3-16 11.30-1.701 0.2-0.6 10.18-0.3116.1-7.3 !Low----------10.43! 1 Fm---------------1 0-601 --- 10.10-0.301 0.6-6.0 10.35-0.4513.6-4.4 !Low------ 1----1--- 1 >50 Freetown 1 1 1 1 1 ! GfB, GfC---------1 0-5 1 1-8 11.00-1.201 6.0-20 10.08-0.1613.6-6.0 ;Low----------!0.241 3 1 1-2 Gloucester 1 5-141 1-8 11.20-1.50! 6.0-20 10.06-0.1013.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.17! ; 114-601 0-5 11.50-1.751 6.0-20 10.03-0.09 13.6-6.0 ;Low------- ;0.171 ! 1 ! ! 1 i i i ! ! 1 GhB, GhC---------1 0-5 1 1-8 ;1.00-1.30! 6.0-20 10.07-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----- ----!0.171 3 1 1-2 Gloucester 1 5-141 1-8 11.20-1.501 6.0-20 ;0.06-0.1013.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.17! 1 114-601 0-5 11.50-1 .751 6.0-20 10.03-0.0813.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.171 ! , I r GxB GxC GxD----1 0-5 1 1-8 11.00-1.301 6.0-20 10.07-0.1613.6-6.0 ;Low----------!0.171 3 1 1-2 Gloucester 1 5-141 1-8 11.20-1.501 6.0-20 1D.06-0.1013.6-6.0 !Low----------;0.17; ; 114-601 0-5 :1.50-1.751 6.0-20 :0.03-0.0813.6-6.0 !Low----------10.171 ! WAN 1 1 ! 1 Ha---------------1 0-111 4-10 11.20-1.501 0.6-2.0 ;0.15-0.2514.5-7.3 !Low----------!0.491 5 ! 2-5 Hadley 111-681 2-10 11.20-1.501 0.6-6.0 10.13-0.2014.5-7.8 !Low----------;0.49; 168-721 1-8 11.20-1 .501 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.2015.1-7.8 !Low----------10.491 1 Hd*: Hadle Y---------- 1 0-111 4-10 11.20-1.501 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.25;4.5-7.3 ;Low----------10.491 5 1 2-5 111-681 2-10 11.20-1 .501 0.6-6.0 10.13-0.2014.5-7.8 !Low----------;0.491 1 168-721 1-8 11.20-1.501 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.20;5.1-7.8 ;Low----------;0.491 ' I r I Winooski--------1 0-171 5-10 11.15-1.351 0.6-6.0 10.15-0.2314.5-7.3 !Low----------10.49; 5 ! 2-5 117-601 2-10 11.20-1.50; 0.6-6.0 ;0.13-0.21 !4.5-7.3 !Low----------10.491 Urban land. ! ! HfB, HfC---------1 0-221 5-18 11.10-1.401 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.25 14.5-6.0 !Low----------10.43; 3 1 2-6 Haven 122-601 0-3 11.45-1.65; >20 ;0.01-0.03!4.5-6.0 ;Low----------10.17! 1 r HHgD,HHgE- H-C----1 0-8 ! 4-8 ;0.90-1.101 6.0-20 10.05-0.2013.6-6.0 !Low----------10.201 3 1 2-7 OR Hinckley 1 8-131 1-5 11.20-1.401 6.0-20 10.01-0.10 13.6-6.0 ;Low----------10.17! ; 113-601 0-3 ; 1.30-1.501 >20 ;0.01-0.0613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.10! ; 1 1 1 ! Hu 10.201 3 1 ' u-8 :0.90-1.101 6.0-20 10.05-0.2013.6-6.0 !Low---------- - Hinekley--------1 0-8 I 1 8-13; 1-5 11.20-1 .40; 6.0-20 10.01-0.1013.6-6.0 1Low----------;0.17; ! 113-60; 0-3 !1.30-1.501 >20 10.01-0.0613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.101 1 ; ! 1 1 1 ; 1 ; 1 1 1-5 Merrimac--------1 0-161 3-7 ;1.10-1.20! 2.0-6.0 10.14-0.1913.6-6.0 !Low----------10.24, 3 ;16-241 1-4 11.20-1.401 2.0-6.0 10.14-0.17 13.6-6.0 ;Low----------10.241 1 124-601 0-3 ;1.3D-1.501 >6.0 10.01-0.0613.6-6.0 ;Low----------!0.101 ; 1 Urban land. 1 1 1 ww See footnote at end of table. Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 163 TABLE 15.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS [The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Entries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire �I11! profile. Entries under "Organic matter" apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not available or were not estimated] T- Erosion 1 ON Soil name and !Depth! Clay ; Moist !Permeability ;Available; Soil ;Shrink-swell 1 factors : Organic map symbol ; bulk ; 1 water ;reaction; potential . 1- matter density : !capacity , ' K I T I n Pct em In/hr n in p c I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 11MAgA, AgB, AgC----: 0-111 4-10 11.10-1.201 2.o-6.0 10.13-0.2514.5-6.5 !Low----------10.281 3 1 1-5 Agawam 111-161 1-10 11.20-1.40.1 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.2114.5-6.5 !Low----------10.371 : 116-261 1-3 11.30-1.401 2.0-20 0.11-0.1814.5-6.5 !Low----------10.281 : 126-55: 1-2 11.30-1.401 6.0-20 0.01-0.0914.5-6.5 :Low----------:0.171 ! 155-601 0-2 11.30-1 .501 6.0-20 0.01-0.0914.5-6.5 :Low----------10.101 1 AmA, AmB---------; 0-7 1 4-10 11.00-1.201 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.1814.5-7.3 !Low----------10.281 3 1 2-5 Amostown 1 7-321 1-5 :1.20-1.40: 2.0-6.o 0.10-0.1514.5-6.0 !Low----------10.281 1 132-601 1-3 11.30-1 .501 0.06-0.6 10.15-0.2114.5-7.3 !Low----------10.64! 1 Amostown--------1 0-7 1 4-10 11.00-1.201 2.0-6.0 10.11-0.18 14.5-7.3 !Low----------10.28! 3 1 2-5 1 7-321 1-5 11.20-1.401 2.0-6.0 10.10-0.15:4.5-6.0 !Low----------10.281 ! 132-601 1-3 11.30-1.501 0.06-0.6 0.15-0.2114.5-7.3 :Low----------!0.641 ! ON Windsor---------1 0-8 1 1-3 11.00-1.201 >6.0 I 10.08-0.12!4.5-5.5 !Low----------10.171 5 1 2-4 ! 8-211 0-3 11.30-1 .551 >6.0 :0.02-0.1214.5-5.5 !Low----------10.171 ! 121-451 0-2 11.40-1.65! >6.0 10.01-0.0814.5-5.5 !Low----------10.171 ! 145-601 5-35 11.30-1.601 0.2-0.6 10.15-0.2015.1-6.5 !Low----------10.431 : Urban land. i I I I I I I I i 1 3aA, BaB---------1 0-101 4-15 10.95-1.151 0.6-2.0 10.18-0.2514.5-7.3 ;Low----------10.49: 3 1 1-5 Belgrade 110-511 4-15 11.10-1.401 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.2014.5-7.3 :Low----------10.64! : 151-601 2-20 17.20-1.401 0.06-6.0 10.06-0.2015.1-7.3 !Low----------:0.641 : i I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 3oA, BOB, BoC----1 0-8 ! 20-40 11.05-1.251 0.2-0.6 10.16-0.2414.,6-6.5 ;Low----------10.321 3 1 2-6 Boxford 1 8-211 25-50 11.20-1.451 0.06-0.2 10.15-0.2214.6-6.5 !Low----------!0.491 ! ;21-371 35-50 11.40-1 .601 <0.2 10.13-0.1515.1-7.3 !Moderate-----10.491 : 137-601 35-50 11.40-1.601 <0.2 10.11-0.15!5.1-7.3 (Moderate-----10.491 ! CkB, CkC---------1 0-7 1 3-8 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.0 10.08-0.2314.5-6.0 ;Low----------10.241 3 1 2-5 Charlton 1 7-221 3-8 11.40-1.651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.321 : 122-601 1-8 11.45-1.701 o.6-6.0 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 !Low----------10.241 : "*'MB, CmC---------1 0-7 1 3-8 :1 .00-1.25! 0.6-6.0 10.08-0.2314.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.201 3 : 2-5 Charlton ! 7-221 3-8 11.40-1.651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.32: : 122-601 1-8 11.45-1.70: 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 !Low----------:0.241 1 CnB, CnC, CnD----1 0-7 1 3-8 11.00-1.251 o.6-6.0 10.05-0.1514.5-6.0 !Low----------10.201 3 ! 2-5 Charlton ; 7-221 3-8 11.40-1 .651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 !Low----------10.321 : :22-601 1-8 11.45-1.701 o.6-6.o 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 :Low----------10.24! : COE*: Charlton--------1 0-7 ! 3-8 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.1514.5-6.0 (Low----------10.201 3 ! 2-5 "M 1 7-221 3-8 11 .40-1 .651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 (Low----------10.321 : 122-601 1-8 11.45-1 .701 0.6-6.o 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 (Low----------!0.241 : Gloucester------1 0-5 1 1-8 11.00-1 .301 6.0-20 10.07-0.1613.6-6.0 !Low----------10.171 3 1 1-2 1 5-141 1-8 11.20-1.501 6.0-20 10.06-0.1013.6-6.0 !Low----------10.171 : : 14-601 0-5 11.50-1.751 6.0-20 10.03-0.0813.6-6.0 !Low----------10.17: : :pC*, CpD* Charlton--------1 0-7 1 3-8 11.00-1.251 0.6-6.o 10.05-0.1514.5-6.0 1Low----------10.201 3 1 2-5 7-221 3-8 11.40-1 .651 0.6-6.0 10.05-0.2014.5-6.0 (Low----------!0.321 : 122-•601 1-8 :1.45-1.701 0.6-6.o 10.05-0.1614.5-6.0 1Low----------10.241 : 1 1 I I , 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Hollis----------i 0-5 ! 3-10 11.10-1.401 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.2114.5-6.0 !Low----------10.171 2 1 2-5 1 5-191 1-8 11.30-1 .551 0.6-6.0 10.06-0.1814.5-6.0 ;Low----------10.321 : ! 19 I I , , , ' ------------i , I See footnote at end of table. 160 Soil survey TABLE 14.--ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued I Classification IFrag- I Percentage passing ON Soil name and !Depth! USDA texture I I lments 1 sieve number-- _;Liquid i Plas- map symbol ! I ! Unified I AASHTO I > 3 1 i I ! limit 1 ticity I i ! ! linchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 1 index 1 In 1 I I r Pet 1 Pet 1 I I I I I 1 I SgB--------------1 0-4 !Fine sandy loam ISM, ML IA-2, A-4, 1 0-5 180-95 170-90 140-85 120-65 1 <20 1 NP-4 I I 1 1 I I I I I I i Scituate I 1 I I A-1 I I 1 , I I I 1 4-211Fine sandy loam, ISM, ML 1A-2, A-4, 1 0-15 170-95 160-90 135-85 120-65 1 <20 1 NP-4 1 1 sandy loam, 1 1 A-1 I I I I I I 'I 1 1 loam. I I I I I I 1 I ,I I lII 121-601Loamy fine sand, ISM, SP-SM 1A-2, A-1 1 0-10 170-95 150-85 120-65 1 5-25 1 <15 1 NP-2 ! ! loamy sand. I I ! I ! I I ! ! 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I � r ! , , ShB, ShC---------I 0-4 !Very stony ISM, ML 1A-2, A-4, 115-35 160-90 155-85 135-80 120-65 1 <20 1 NP-4 Scituate 1 1 fine sandy loam. ! 1 A-1 I I I I I I I Uw 1 4-21 !Fine sandy loam, ISM, ML IA-2, A-4, 1 0-15 170-95 160-90 135-85 120-65 1 <20 1 NP-4 1 1 loam, sandy 1 1 A-1 I I I I I I I 1 1 loam. ! I I ! I ! I I I 121-601Loamy fine sand, ISM, SP-SM 1A-2, A-1 1 0-10 170-95 150-85 120-65 1 5-25 ! <15 1 NP-2 I I- loamy sand. I I ! ! ! ! 1 ! I I I � 1 I I I I I I I I I SrA, SrB---------I 0-101Fine sandy loam ISM, ML !A-2, A-4, 1 0-5 185-100170-100140-90 120-55 1 --- 1 NP Sudbury ! ! ! 1 A-1 I I I I ' I I I 110-161Sandy loam, fine ISM IA-2, A-4, 1 0-5 185-100160-100140-80 120-50 1 --- 1 NP 1 1 sandy loam, 1 1 A-1 I I I I I I 1 I , , 1 1 1 1 gravelly sandy I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 , I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I loam. I � I 1 I I , 1 I 116-281Gravelly coarse ISM, SP-SM IA-1 , A-2, I 0-5 170-100160-100130-70 1 5-35 1 --- 1 NP 1 1 sand, loamy 1 1 A-3 I I I` 1 i ` I I I I 1 1 sand, sandy I I I I I ! I I I AAIM 1 ! loam. ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! ! 128-601Stratified sand 1SP, SP-SM, IA-1, A-2 110-40 135-70 125-55 115-45 ! 0-10 1 --- 1 NP ! ! and gravel. 1 GP, GP-GMI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I Su---------------1 0-101Loamy fine sand ISM 1A-2 1 0 195-100185-100165-70 115-35 1 --- 1 NP go Suncook 110-60IStratified loamy 1SP, SM, 1A-2, A-3, I 0 190-100170-100120-80 I 0-35 1 --- 1 NP 1 1 fine sand to 1 SP-SM 1 A-1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! coarse sand. I I I I I I I I I I I i ` I I I 1 1 I f I Sw---------------1 0-21ISapric material IPT 1 Swansea IA-8 --- f1s 121-40ISapric material, 1PT 1A-8 I --- --- 1 1 hemic material. 1 1 1 ! ! ! I ! I 140-60ISand, loamy ISM, SP-SM 1A-1, A-2, 1 0 155-100145-100130-70 1 5-30 1 --- 1 NP 1 1 coarse sand, 1 I A-3 I ! I ! I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 gravelly loamy AAAA ! 1 coarse sand. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ud* Udorthents Aw Wa---------------1 0-4 !Fine sandy loam ISM IA-2, A-4 1 0-5 190-100185-100170-100130-50 1 <25 1 NP-3 Walpole 1 4-23IFine sandy loam, ISM IA-2, A-4 1 0-5 185-100160-100140-95 125-50 1 --- 1 NP I ! sandy loam, I ! ! I ! I 1 ! I ! ! gravelly sandy ! ! 1 ! I 1 ! ! ! I ! loam. 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I go 123-60!Gravelly loamy ISP, SM, IA-1 , A-2, 1 0-20 155-100150-100125-90 1 0-25 1 --- 1 NP 1 1 sand, gravelly 1 SP-SM 1 A-3 I I I I I ! ! 1 1 sand, coarse I ! ! 1 ! ! ! I I 1 ! sand. I I I 1 1 1 I I I I ' I I I I 1 f 1 I 1 1 I so WeB, WeC---------! 0-9 !Fine sandy loam IML, CL-ML 1A-4 I 0-5 180-95 175-95 165-85 155-70 1 <40 1 NP-8 Wethersfield . 1 9-23ILoam, silt loam, lML, CL-ML !A-4 1 0-5 180-95 175-95 165-85 155-70 1 <40 I NP-8 1 1 fine sandy loam.! I I I I I I I I 123-60!Gravelly loam, ISM, ML, IA-4 1 0-10 175-95 170-90 l60-80 140-65 ! <40 ! NP-8 1 ! loam, gravelly I CL-ML, I I 1 ! ! ! ! ! !M I ! fine sandy loam. ) SM-SC I ! ! ! 1 I ! I i I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 See footnote at end of table. uw AIM 158 Soil survey TABLE 14,--ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued Classification rag- , Percentage passing , Soil name and !Depth; USDA texture ; , iments 1 sieve number-- !Liquid 1 Plas- map symbol i i ; Unified 1 AASHTO !I > 3 1 1 i 1 limit I ticity I !inches! 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 1 index I In 1 I , , Pot Fct 1 PbB, PbC, PbD----1 0-3 ;Stony fine ism, ML, !A-2, A-4 1 5-20 180-95 175-90 160-85 130-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 1 t 1 1 I 1 I I I t , Paxton , , sandy loam. , SM-SC , , , I I I , 1 1 3-261Fine sandy loam, 1SM9 ML, !A-2, A-4 1 5-20 170-90 165-90 150-85 125-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 loam, gravelly i SM-SC sandy loam, i 126-60;Fine sandy loam, ism, ML, !A-2, A-4 1 5-15 170-90 160-85 150-75 120-60 1 <30 1 NP-10 loam, gravelly 1 SM-SC I sandy loam. PCB, PcC, PcD, PcE-------------1 0-3 !Very stony ism, ML, !A-2, A-4 110-25 180-90 170-85 160-80 130-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 1 I t 1 i I 1 1 , i 1 Paxton , , fine sandy loam„ SM-SC , , , , 1 , 1 1 1 3-26IFine sandy loam, ism, ML, !A-2, A-4 ! 5-20 i70-90 165-90 150-85 125-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 1 loam, gravelly 1 SM-SC i ! i i i i i i i 1 sandy loam. I i i i i i i i i 126-60!Fine sandy loam, ism, ML, 1A-2, A-4 1 5-15 170-90 160-85 150-75 120-60 1 <30 1 NP-10 loam, gravelly 1 SM-SC 1 i sandy loam. Pd*: w Paxton----------1 0-3 !Fine sandy loam ism, ML, lA-2, A-4 1 0-10 180-95 175-90 160-85 130-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 i i SM-SC 1 i i i i i i i 1 3-26IFine sandy loam, ism, ML, 1A-2, A-4 1 0-15 170-90 165-90 150-85 125-65 1 <30 1 NP-10 loam, gravelly 1 SM-SC i i i i i i i i , , i 1 1 1 1 1 I I I sandy loam. , , , 1 , , 1 I 126-60!Fine sandy loam, 1SM, ML, !A-2, A-4 1 0-15 170-90 i60-85 150-75 120-60 1 <30 1 NP-10 loam, gravelly i SM-SC i , sandy loam. 1 I 1 1 I t I 1 t I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 Charlton--------1 0-7 !Fine sandy loam ism, ML iA-2, A-4 1 0-10 185-95 175-90 150-85 125-65 1 <25 1 NP-5 1 7-22!Fine sandy loam, ism, ML !A-2, A-4 1 5-15 165-90 160-90 140-80 120-65 1 <25 1 NP-3 i 1 gravelly fine sandy loam, gravelly loam. 122-60IGravelly sandy ism !A-2, A-4 1 5-15 160-90 460-85 140-75 120-50 1 --- 1 NP , , I loam, gravelly I 1 , 1 fine sandy loam, , loam. Urban land. Pg* Pits PuA, PuB, PuC----1 0-4 !Fine sandy loam ism, ML !A-41 A-2 1 0 195-100;85-100155-95 130-75 1 <25 1 NP-10 Pollux i 4-301Sandy loam, fine ISM, ML lA-21 A-4 1 0 190-100185-100155-95 125-65 I <25 1 NP-10 , t i, ,, 1 1 i sandy loam. , , , I 1 1 ;30-60!Stratified silt 1ML, SM, !A-4, A-2,1 0 1 100 1 100 165-100125-90 1 <25 1 NP-20 1 loam to very 1 CL, CL-MLI A-6 i i i i i i i , I fine sand, Pv---------------1 0-10IFine sandy loam ism, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 195-100180-100155-95 130-75 i <25 ! NP-4 Pootatuck 110-34ISandy loam, fine ism !A-2, A-4 1 0 195-100180-100155-85 130-50 1 <20 1 NP-2 1 sandy loam. i i i i i i i i i 134-60ISand, loamy sand, !SP-SM, SM !A-1, A-2 ! 0 170-100150-100130-45 1 5-20 1 --- 1 NP 1 I I 1 I 1 t I 1 1 I gravelly sand. Quarries ------1 ' Ra--------- 1 0-10lSilt loam--------1ML, CL-ML lA-4 1 0 i 100 195-100180-100155-95 1 <25 ! NP-10 Raynham 110-371Silt loam, silt, 1ML, CL-ML 1A-4 i 0 1 100 145-100180-100155-95 ! <25 1 NP-10 t I 1, very fine sandy i loam. 137-601Si1t loam; silt, IML, CL-ML lA-4 ; 0 1 100 195-100190-100170-95 1 <25 1 NP-10 I I 1 very fine sandy , I i loam. 1 f 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 See footnote at end of table. ON 156 Soil survey TABLE 14.--ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued Classification ,Frag- , Percentage passing pa Soil name and !Depth! USDA texture 1 , lments 1 sieve number-- !Liquid ; Plas- map symbol ; ! i Unified ! AASHTO ! .> 3 ! , i 1 limit 1 ticity ! ! ! ! !inches! 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 I 1 index , n , 1 Pet , et 00 HgA, HgB, HgC, HgD, HgE--------1 0-8 !Loamy sand-------ISM, SP-SM 1A-1, A-2, 1 0-5 180-95 175-85 130-80 ; 5-50 1 --- 1 NP Hinckley ! ! ! 1 A-4 i ' ' ' ' 1 8-131Gravelly loamy 1SM, SP-SM !A-1, A-2,1 0-20 150-95 130-85 115-70 1 2-30 1 --- ; NP ! 1 , sand, loamy finer ' A-3 r sand, very gravelly loamy coarse sand. , , , , , , , , , 113-60!Stratified very ;SP, SP-SM,1A-1 , A-2 1 5-30 120-65 120-50 110-40 1 0-20 1 --- 1 NP ! ! gravelly loamy 1 GP, GP-GM! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! on fine sand to cobbly coarse ! 1 sand. Hu*: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! No Hinckley--------1 0-8 !Loamy sand-------1SM, SP-SM 1A-1, A-2, 1 0-5 180-95 175-85 130-80 1 5-50 1 --- 1 NP ! ! ! 1 A-4 i i ' ' i 1 8-131Gravelly loamy 1SM, SP-SM 1A-1, A-2, 1 0-20 150-95 130-85 115-70 1 2-30 1 --- 1 NP , sand, loamy fine,, , , , ,, A-3 , , , , , , , ! ! sand, very ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! gravelly loamy ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! coarse sand, 113-601Stratified very 1SP, SP-SM,!A-1 , A-2 ! 5-30 120-65 120-50 110-40 1 0-20 1 --- 1 NP ! ! gravelly loamy 1 GP, GP-GM! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! fine sand to ! ! cobbly coarse ! ! sand. Merrimac--------! 0-161Fine sandy loam ISM, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 185-95 170-90 140-85 120-55 1 --- 1 NP 116-241Sandy loam-------1SM !A-2, A-1 1 0 175-95 170-90 140-60 12D-35 1 --- 1 NP 124-60!Stratified sand 1GP, SP, 1A-1 , A-2 1 5-25 140-65 130-60 115-40 1 0-10 1 --- ! NP ! i to very gravelly! SP-SM, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! coarse sand. 1 GP-GM ! 1 1 1 ! ! ! Urban land. HvC--------------1 0-4 !Stony silt 1ML, SM !A-2, A-4 1 5-15 175-95 155-90 145-85 125-75 1 <25 1 NP-5 Holyoke ' ' ' ' i ' i ' i Y , , loam. , , , , , , , , , 1 4-161Silt loam, loam, 1ML, SM 1A-2, A-4 1 0-15 175-95 155-90 145-85 125-75 1 <25 1 NP-3 gravelly fine , , sandy loam. , --- 16 ,Unweathered ! ! bedrock. Lk---------------1 0-12!Silt loam--------,'ML 1A-4 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-95 1 --- 1 NP Limerick 112-201Silt loam, very !ML 1A-4 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-95 1 --- 1 NP fine sandy loam. , 120-601Silt loam, very ;ML 1A-4 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-95 1 --- 1 NP fine sandy loam. ,, !M Ma---------------1 0-13!Silt loam--------1ML, CL 1A-4, A-6, 1 0 1 100 1 100 190-100175-95 1 30-50 1 4-26 Maybid ! ! 1 1 A-7 ! ! ! 1 ! 1 ! 113-241Silty clay, silty!CL, ML 1A-6, A-7 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100185-95 1 30-50 1 10-26 i , clay loam, clay., , , , , , ,, , ,, 124-60!Silty clay loam, 1CL, ML !A-6, A-7 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100185-95 1 30-50 1 10-26 WO , , silty clay, clay. MeA, MeB, MeC, MeD-------------1 0-161Fine sandy loam 1SM, ML 1A-2, A-4 1 0 185-95 170-90 140-85 120-55 1 --- 1 NP Merrimac 116-241Sandy loam-------1SM 1A-2, A-1 1 0 175-95 170-90 140-60 120-35 1 --- 1 NP 124-601Stratified sand iGP, SP, 1A-1, A-2 1 5-25 140-65 130-60 115-40 1 0-10 1 --- 1 NP ! to very gravelly) SP-SM, coarse sand. , GP-GM See footnote at end of table. go 152 Soil survey TABLE 14.--ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES [The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] asst ica ion ; rag- Percentage passing Soil name and ;Depth! USDA texture ! , lments 1 sieve number-- -!Liquid 1 Plas- map symbol i ! 1 Unified 1 AASHTO 1 > 3 1 ! limit 1 ticity , , i ,inches, 4 , 10 , 40 200 , , index In , '! , , Pet , , , , , Pct , AgA, AgB, AgC----1 0-111Fine sandy loam 1SM, ML 1A-4 1 0 195-100190-100165-95 140-65 ! <25 1 NP-3 Agawam 111-161Fine sandy loam, 1SM, ML 1A-4 1 0 195-100185-100165-95 140-65 1 <25 1 NP-3 very fine sandy , loam, loam. , 116-261Fine sandy loam 1SM, SP-SM !A-2, A-3, ! 0 190-100185-100160-95 1 5-45 1 <20 1 NP-3 , , , , , , , 126-551Fine sand, loamy ISM, SP-SM 1A-2, A-1 1 0 190-100185-100140-90 1 5-35 1 --- 1 NP fine sand, loamy,, r r send. , � 155-60!Stratified fine 1SM, SP-SM, !A-1, A-2, 1 0-5 150-100130-100115-80 1 5-35 1 --- 1 NP sand t0 very 1 GM, GP-GM1 A-3 gravelly loamy �1 sand. AmA, AmB---------1 0-7 !Fine sandy loam 1SM, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 195-100190-100155-95 130-70 1 <25 1 NP-10 Amostown ! 7-321Fine sandy loam, 1SM, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 190-100185-100150-95 125-65 1 <25 ! NP-10 sandy loam. , , , , , , , , , 1'w 132-6013tratified silt 1ML, SM !A-4, A-2 1 0 ! 100 1 100 165-100125-90 1 <25 1 NP-10 loam t0 very fine sandy loam., Aug: Amostown--------1 0-7 !Fine sandy loam 1SM, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 195-100190-100155-95 130-70 1 <25 1 NP-10 1 7-321Fine sandy loam, lSM, ML !A-2, A-4 1 0 190-100!85-100150-95 125-65 ! <25 1 NP-10 , , , , , , , , sandy loam. , , , , , , , , , 132-601Stratified silt 1ML; SM !A-4, A-2 1 0 1 100 1 100 165-100125-90 1 <25 1 NP-10 loam to very , , , , , , , , , fine sandy loam. ,, Windsor---------1 0-8 !Loamy sand-------1SM 1A-1, A-2 1 0 195-100185-100135-85 120-35 1 --- 1 NP 1 8-21 !Loamy sand, loamy!SW-SM, SM, 1A-1, A-2 1 0 195-100185-100145-85 110-30 I --- 1 NP , , , , , fine sand, sand. , SP-SM , ,, , , , , , , Iw 121-451Sand, fine sand :SP-SM, SM, !A-1, A-2, 1 0 190-100175-100140-95 1 5-20 1 --- 1 NP ! SW-SM 1 A-3 ! ! ! ! 145-601Silt loam, very 1ML, CL, 1A-4, A-6 1 0 195-100190-100175-90 155-80 1 20-40 1 NP-25 , fine sandy loam, , CL-ML , , Silty clay loam. ! Urban land. BaA, BaB---------1 0-10!Silt loam--------1ML !A-4 ! 0 1 100 195-100190-100160-95 ! <35 ! NP-8 Belgrade 110-5113ilt loam, very 1ML 1A-4 ! 0 1 100 195-100!85-100150-90 1 <35 1 NP-8 fine sandy loam, , , , , loamy very fine ,1 , sand. ,, 151-601Silt loam, loamy 1ML, SM, !A-1, A-2, 1 0 175-100155-100135-100115-90 1 <35 1 NP-8 1 1 very fine sand, 1 CL-ML ! A-4 sand and gravel. , BoA, BoB, BoC----1 0-8 !Silt loam--------lML, CL 1A-4, A-5, 1 0 198-100!95-100190-100185-95 1 30-45 1 5-15 Boxford ! ! 1 1 A-6, A-71 ! ! i ! ! 8-211Silt loam, silty 1ML, CL 1A-4, A-5, 1 0 198-100195-100190-100185-95 •1 30-45 1 5-15 I clay loam. 1 1 A-6, A-7! ! ! ! ! ! ! 121-37lSilty clay loam, 1ML, CL ,1A-4, A-6 1 0 198-100!95-100190-100185-95 1 20-40 1 5-18 , , , Silty clay. , , , , , , i i i 137-60!Silty clay loam, lML, CL !A-4, A-6 1 0 198-100195-100190-100180-95 1 20-35 1 5-18 Silty Clay, clay. See footnote at end of table. 150 Soil survey on TABLE 13.--WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued Limitations for ; Features affecting-- Soil name and ; Pond ; Aquifer—fed : Terraces 10 map symbol ; reservoir ! excavated Drainage I Irrigation and ! Grassed areas : ponds ! : ! diversions ; waterways I Sa----------------;Moderate: :Severe: ;Flooding, :Wetness, ;Wetness--------;Wetness. Saco ! seepage. ; cutbanks cave. ! frost action, ! flooding. ! , ! cutbanks cave. ; ! ' I Sb----------------!Severe: !Severe: lCutbanks cave, :Ponding, lPonding, !Wetness, Scarboro 1 seepage. ! cutbanks cave. ! frost action. ! fast intake, ! too sandy. ! droughty. droughty. ---------I I Sc------- !Slight---------!Severe: !Peres slowly, !Wetness, !Wetness, !Wetness, Scitico ! I slow refill. ! frost action. ! peres slowly, ! peres slowly, ! peres slowly, I ! erodes easily. ! erodes easily. ! erodes easily. 11111 I � SgB---------------!Severre: !Severe: !Peres slowly, !Wetness, !Wetness, !Rooting depth, Scituate ! seepage. ! no water. ! slope. ! peres slowly, ! rooting depth, ! peres slowly. I ! ! ! slope. ! peres slowly. ! NO ShB---------------!Severe: !Severe: !Peres slowly, !Peres slowly, !Wetness, !Rooting depth, Scituate ! seepage. ! no water. ! slope. ! wetness, ! rooting depth, ! peres slowly. slope. ! peres slowly. sm , , I ShC---------------!Severe: !Severe: !Peres slowly, ;Peres slowly, !Slope, !Slope, Scituate ! seepage, ! no water. I slope. ! wetness, ! wetness, ! rooting depth, slope. ! ! ! slope. peres slowly. ! Peres slowly. I SrA---------------!Severe: !Severe: :Cutbanks cave !Wetness--------!Too sandy, Favorable. Sudbury ! seepage. ! cutbanks cave. ! ! ! wetness. SrB---------------!Severe: ;Severe: iSlope, !Wetness, :Too sandy, !Favorable. Sudbury ! seepage. ! cutbanks cave. ! cutbanks cave. ! slope. ! wetness. -------- ' 1 Su-------- !Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water :Droughty, !Too sandy------:Too sandy. Suncook ! seepage. : no water. ! ! fast intake, : flooding. ! ! ! ! ! ! Sw----------------:Severe: !Severe: lCutbanks cave, :Wetness--------!Wetness, !Wetness. Swansea ! seepage. ! cutbanks cave. 1 frost action. : ! too sandy. : 1 Ud*. Udorthents Wa----------------!Severe: !Severe: !Frost action, :Wetness--------!Wetness, :Wetness. Walpole ! seepage. ! cutbanks cave. ! cutbanks cave. ! ! too sandy. I WeB---------------!Moderate: !Severe: ;Deep to water !peres slowly, !Peres slowly, !Peres slowly, Wethersfield : slope. ! no water. ! I rooting depth, : rooting depth. : rooting depth. I ! ! slope. WeC---------------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Peres slowly, !Slope, !Slope, Wethersfield I slope. ! ev water. ! I rooting depth, : peres slowly, ! peres slowly, I ! ! 1 slope. ! rooting depth. rooting depth. #m : WfB---------------:Moderate: !Severe: !Deep to water :Peres slowly, !Rooting depth, !Peres slowly, Wethersfield I slope. : no water. ! ! rooting depth, ! peres slowly. ! rooting depth. 1 : slope. ! WfC---------------'Severre: !Severe: ;Deep to water !Peres slowly, :Slope, !Peres slowly, Wethersfield I slope. ! no water. ! ! rooting depth, ! rooting depth, ! slope, 1 slope. ! peres slowly. ! rooting depth. WgB---------------!Moderate: :Severe: ;Deep to water :Peres slowly, :Rooting depth, !Peres slowly, 11111 Wethersfield ! slope. I no water. ! ! rooting depth, peres slowly. ! rooting depth. I , slope. I ' ' I i WgC---------------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Peres slowly, !Slope, !Peres slowly, Wethersfield I slope. : no water. : : rooting depth, ! rooting depth, ! slope, slope. I peres slowly. ! rooting depth. WhA---------------:Slight---------:Severe: ;Peres slowly, :Ponding, :Wetness, :Wetness, Whitman ! ! slow refill. : frost action. ! peres slowly, ! peres slowly, ! peres slowly, : rooting depth. : rooting depth. : rooting depth. See footnote at end of table. go Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 149 TABLE 13.--WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued Limitations for-- Features affecting-- Soil name and ; Pond 1 Aquifer-fed 1 I ! Terraces map symbol ! reservoir 1 excavated I Drainage ; Irrigation ! and ! Grassed 1 areas ; ponds ; ! ; diversions 1 waterways r I 1 , I ? POD, PcE-----:Severe: !Severe: ;Deep to water :Slope, !Slope, !Slope, xton I slope. i no water. ! ! large stones, ! rooting depth, ! rooting depth, peres slowly. : peres slowly. 1 peres slowly. I 1 I ?d*: Oaxton-----------!Moderate: !Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, :Peres slowly, :Peres slowly, slope. ! no water. ; 1 peres slowly, ! rooting depth. : rooting depth. ! ! ! ! rooting depth. ! ! 1 Charlton---------!Severe: iSevere: iDeep to water :Slope----------!Favorable------!Favorable. 00 1 seepage. 1 no water. I I I ! I ! I I I , I ban land. ! I I I ! I , I ?g*. ; *%t s ?e- ---------------!Slight---------!Severe: ;Deep to water !Peres slowly---!Erodes easily, (Erodes easily, Pollux ! 1 no water. ; ! ! peres slowly. ! peres slowly. ! I 'tom---------------!Moderate: !Severe: !Deep to water ;Peres slowly, !Erodes easily, !Erodes easily, 1 flux ! slope. i no water. ! ! slope. ! peres slowly. 1 peres slowly. I 'uC---------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Peres slowly, !Slope, !Slope, Pollux 1 slope. ! no water. ! ! slope. ! erodes easily, , erodes easily, : ! peres slowly. , peres slowly. : ! �v; .______________;Severe: ;Severe: ;Flooding, !Wetness, 'Wetness, 'Favorable. Pootatuck ! seepage. ; cutbanks cave. ! cutbanks cave. ; floodin g ! too sand y. LOA I r C'. 3rrles ' slow! ,y ! P eres s r.. 1a----------------!Slight---------!Severe: !Peres slowly, !Wetness, ;Wetness, ,Wetness, Raynham ! ; slow refill. ! frost action. ! peres slowly, ,r peres slowly, III ! ! ! erodes easily. , erodes easily. , erodes easily. I , 1 I& ---------------!Slight---------!Severe: ;Peres slowly, !Wetness, !Wetness, !Wetness, Ridgebury ; ! no water. ! frost action. ; peres slowly, ! peres slowly, ! peres slowly, ! ! rooting depth. ! rooting depth. : rooting depth. 2d i Moderate i:Severe: iSP e r ;Slope, i W , R gebury ! slope. no water. pe res slowly, wetne ss peres slowly, 1 slowly, frost actio n percs slowly. rooting depth. depth . rooting depth. ! rooting ! F ?ePO------- !Slight---------!Severe: ;Peres slow! 'Wetness ,Wetness :Wetness R'_''gebury ! ! no water. ! frost action. ! peres slow! h. eres slow!depth. eres slowl ooting dept I I P 2eB---------------!Moderate: !Severe: ;Slope, !Slope, !Wetness, y' :Wetness, y' RORgebury 1 slope. ! no water. ! peres slowly, ! wetness, ! peres slow! peres slow! frost action. ! Peres slowly. 1 rooting depth. : rooting dept tm----------------!Severe: iSevere: iFlooding, !Wetness, !Wetness, !Wetness. lw owam 1 seepage. ! cutbanks cave. ! cutbanks cave, ! flooding. ! too sandy. I , ! frost action. Rock outcrop ! ! I I I RoE*: Rc' < outcrop. I Narragansett-----!Severe: iSevere: ;Deep to water !Slope----------!Slope, iSlo too sandy. e. ! P ! seepage, ! no water. ! I , IWO ! slope. He ,yoke----------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Slope, !Slope, e slope, ! no water. ! { depth to rock. erodes easily, ! erodes easily, depth to rock. ! ! ! ! depth to rock. , depth to rock. I ! ! ! I I aee footnote at end of table. ,I �;I in 148 Soil survey TABLE 13.--WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued Limitations for-- ; Features affecting-- Soil name and ; Pond : Aquifer—fed : ; : Terraces map symbol ; reservoir ; excavated ; Drainage : Irrigation : and Grassed areas ; ponds ; ; ; diversions , waterways Lk----------------!Moderate: !Moderate: !Flooding, ;Wetness, ;Wetness, ;Wetness, Limerick ; seepage. ; slow refill. : frost action. : flooding, : erodes easily. ; erodes easily. r , : i erodes easily. ; , Ma----------------:Slight---------!Severe: !Peres slowly, ,Pondin ' g, :Pending, ;Wetness, Maybid ; : slow refill. ! pending, : peres slowly. : erodes easily, ; pares slowly, frost action. : : peres slowly. ; erodes easily. MeA---------------:Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water :Favorable------;Too sandy------:Favorable. Merrimac ; seepage. ! no water. , MeB---------------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water :Slope----------:Too sandy------!Favorable. Merrimac : seepage. : no water. MeC, MeD----------!Severe: :Severe: !Deep to water !Slope----------!Slope, :Slope. Merrimac : slope, ; no water. ; ; : too sandy. seepage. MOB---------------!Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water !Peres slowly, :Rooting depth, !Rooting depth, Montauk : seepage. ! no water. : ! rooting depth, : peres slowly. ! peres slowly. ! slope. MOC, MSC----------:Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water :Peres slowly, !Slope, Montauk P !Slope, : seepage, : no water. : : rooting depth, : rooting depth, : rooting depth, slope. : ; : slope. : peres slowly. ! peres slowly. P" : : : : : : MxB---------------!Severe: !Severe: :Deep to water !Peres slowly, :Rooting depth, :Rooting depth, Montauk ; seepage. ! no water. : : rooting depth, ! peres slowly. : peres slowly. slope. po MxC, MxD----------:Severe: !Severe: !Deep to water !Peres slowly, :Slope, :Slope, Montauk : seepage, : no water. : : rooting depth, : rooting depth, : rooting depth, slope. slope. peres slow! � � � � y. : peres slowly. NaC*, NaD*: ; PW Narragansett-----:Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water :Slope----------!Slope, :Slope. seepage, : no water. : : : too sandy. slope. ; Holyoke----------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water :Slope, !Slope, !Slope, p No : slope, : no water. : : depth to rock. ! erodes p erodes easily, ! depth to rock. : : : 1 depth to rock. : depth torock Rock outcrop. ' lA NgA---------------,Severe: ;Severe: ;cutbanks cave :Wetness--------:Wetness, :Favorable. Ninigret : seepage. : cutbanks cave. ! : : too sandy. NgB---------------!Severe: :Severe: :Slope, :Slope, :Wetness, :Favorable. Ninigret : seepage. I cutbanks cave. : cutbanks cave. : wetness. : too sandy. PaB---------------:Moderate: :Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Peres slowly, !Peres slowly, Paxton slope. , no water. , peres slow! ' y, : rooting depth. : rooting depth. : rooting depth. : WX PaC, PaD----------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, :Slope, :Slope, Paxton : slope. : no water. : : peres slowly, : peres slowly, ! peres slowly, ! rooting depth. : rooting depth. ! rooting depth. PbB---------------:Moderate: !Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Rooting depth, :Rooting depth, !0 Paxton : slope. : no water. : : large stones, : peres slowly. : peres slowly. peres slowly. ! PbC, PbD----------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water :Slope, !Slope, :Slope, Paxton I slope. I no water. ! ! large stones, ! rooting depth, : rooting depth, slowly. es slow! ' y. : p er y. : peres slowly. PeB---------------:Moderate: :Severe: :Deep to water !Slope, !Rooting depth, :Rooting depth, Paxton I slope. : no water. : : large stones, : peres slowly. ! peres slowly. peres slowly. ! See footnote at end of table. now !wlampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 147 TABLE 13.--WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued Limitations for-- Features affecting-- Soil name and ; Pond : Aquifer-fed : : ! Terraces map symbol ; reservoir I excavated ; Drainage ! Irrigation : and ; Grassed : areas ; ponds : ! : diversions ; waterways ----------- ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water ;Slope, ;Large stones, ;Large stones, C? :)ucester ; seepage. ; no water. ! ; droughty, ; too sandy. : droughty. large stones. 1 1 1 1 I I } ---------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water ;Slope, ;Slope, ;Slope, (` oucester ! slope, ; no water. ! ! droughty, ! large stones, ! large stones, ! seepage. ; ; ; large stones. ; too sandy. : droughty. I I I I I I I I I I I I ,hB---------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water ;Slope, ;Large stones, ;Large stones, W ucester ! seepage. ; no water. ; : large stones, ; too sandy. : droughty. droughty. 1 I f 1 1 I 3hC---------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water ;Slope, ;Slope, ;Slope, Gloucester : slope, ; no water. ; ; large stones, 1 large stones, ! large stones, seepage. : : ; droughty. I too sandy. ; droughty. 3: ---------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water ;Slope, ;Large stones, ;Large stones, Gloucester : seepage. : no water. I large stones, too sandy. ! droughty. droughty. 3,, , GxD----------;Severe: ;Severe: :Deep to water ;Slope, !Slope, ;Slope, ('. Ducester ; slope, no water. : : large stones, ! large stones, : large stones, : seepage. ; : ! droughty. : too sandy. : droughty. 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 i --------------:Severe: !Moderate: ;Deep to water !Flooding, :Erodes easily ;Erodes easily. Y iley ! seepage. : deep to water. ! : erodes easily. ! p a*. I 1 1 I I I l I I 1 I I I Hadley-----------!Severe: !Moderate: !Deep to water !Flooding, :Erodes easily !Erodes easily. : seepage. : deep to water. ! ! erodes easily. ! : I 1 1 f 1 I I I I I ! 6 •icoski---------!Severe: ;Moderate: !Frost action---:Wetness, !Erodes easily, !Erodes easily. : seepage. : deep to water. : : erodes easily, ! wetness. : ! flooding. ! : 1 1 t I LG )an land. 1 I 1 I I I HfB---------------:Severe: iSevere: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Erodes easily, !Erodes easily. Haven ! seepage. ! no water. ! ! erodes easily. ! too sandy. 1 1 1 1 I Ht- ---------------:Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water !Slope, !Slope, !Slope, F ven ! seepage, : no water. ! : erodes easily. ! erodes easily, ! erodes easily. : slope. : : : : too sandy. I 1 1 I 1 1 HOW--------------:Severe: !Severe: !Deep to water !Droughty, !Large stones, :Large stones, F ickley : seepage. I no water. : : fast intake. ! too sandy. ! droughty. HgB---------------!Severe: iSevere: ;Deep to water :Slope, !Large stones, !Large stones, Hinckley : seepage. ! no water. ! : droughty, ! too sandy. : droughty. fast intake. : 1 I I 1 i I I I I I I I H&_ HgD, HgE-----!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Slope, !Large stones, Hinckley ! slope, ! no water. : : droughty, 1 large stones, ! droughty, : seepage. ! ! ! fast intake. : too sandy. ! slope. 1 I 1 I I I i I I I I 1 Ht F_.ickley---------!Severe: !Severe: !Deep to water !Slope, !Large stones, :Large stones, : seepage. : no water. ! : droughty, : too sandy. ! droughty. fast intake. : I I I N ---------:Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water !Slope----------!Too sandy------!Favorable. seepage. ! no water. 1 1 , Urban land. HN- ---------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, !Slope, :Slope, F_iyoke ! slope, ! no water. ! : depth to rock. ! erodes easily, : erodes easily, depth to rock. : : : : depth to rock. ! depth to rock. See footnote at end of table. in joi lampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 145 TABLE 13.--WATER MANAGEMENT � o me terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not evaluated] Limitations for-- : Features affecting-- Soil name and : Pond 1 Aquifer—fed ; : 1 Terraces map symbol : reservoir 1 excavated ; Drainage 1 Irrigation : and ; Grassed areas ponds : diversions 1 waterways I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1---------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water :Favorable------:Too sandy------;Favorable. =° 3awam : seepage. ; no water. I I I 1 I I Ag3---------------!Severe: iSevere: !Deep to water !Slope----------!Too sandy------!Favorable. Agawam ; seepage. ; no water. E` .---------------:Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water :Slope----------:Slope, ;Slope. ,awam 1 slope, ; no water. : ; : too sandy. : seepage. ---------:Slight---------!Severe: !Favorable------:Wetness, :Erodes easily, !Erodes easily, iostown : 1 slow refill. : : peres slowly. i wetness, : peres slowly. peres slowly. 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I AmB---------------;Moderate: !Severe: !Slope----------:Wetness, !Erodes easily, :Erodes easily, mWostown : slope. ! slow refill. : : peres slowly, 1 wetness, 1 peres slowly. slope. : peres slowly. ; I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Au*: Amostown---------!Slight---------;Severe: ;Favorable------,Wetness, !Erodes easily, :Erodes easily, slow refill. : : peres slowly. 1 wetness, : peres slowly. 1 Peres slowly. 1 1 I I I I I Windsor----------:Severe: iSevere: !Deep to water :Droughty, !Too sandy------!Droughty. : seepage. 1 no water. : : fast intake, 1 peres slowly. I I I ! I I •ban land. I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I BaA---------------:Severe: iSevere: ;Peres slowly, :Wetness, !Erodes easily, !Erodes easily, O,olgrade : seepage. : cutbanks cave, 1 frost action. : Peres slowly. : wetness. 1 peres slowly. slow refill. : t 1 1 I I I Bab---------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Peres slowly, !Wetness, :Erodes easily, !Erodes easily, Belgrade : seepage. : cutbanks cave, ! frost action, 1 peres slowly, 1 wetness. : peres slowly. : slow refill. : slope. : slope. : 1 I I I 1 I B .---------------;Slight---------!Severe: ;Peres slowly, :Wetness, :Erodes easily, !Wetness, Boxford : : slow refill. 1 frost action. 1 peres slowly. : wetness, 1 erodes easily, peres slowly. 1 peres slowly. I I I I I B ---------------!Moderate: :Severe: ;Peres slowly, :Wetness, ;Erodes easily, !Wetness, xford 1 slope. 1 slow refill. 1 frost action, 1 peres slowly, : wetness, 1 erodes easily, slope. 1 slope. : peres slowly. 1 peres slowly. ---------i B�------ :Severe: iSevere: ;Peres slowly, :Wetness, :Slope, :Wetness, xford 1 slope. : slow refill. 1 frost action, 1 peres slowly, ; erodes easily, 1 slope, slope. : slope. 1 wetness. : erodes easily. I I I I I I I I I I 1 I CkB---------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope----------!Favorable------;Favorable. i. 40arlton : seepage. 1 no water. I I C ---------------!Severe: :Severe: :Deep to water :Slope----------!Slope----------!Slope. Charlton : slope, i no water. I : seepage. C• ---------------:Severe: !Severe: !Deep to water !Slope, :Large stones---:Large stones. arlton : seepage. : no water. : : large stones. CmC---------------!Severre: ;Severe: ;Deep to water !Slope, ;Slope, !Slope, 40arlton I slope, : no water. : : large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. I : seepage. CnB---------------!Severe: iSevere: !Deep to water !Slope, !Large stones---;Large stones. Charlton I seepage. : no water. : : large stones. I I I i I 1 See footnote at end of table. w 142 Soil survey TABLE 12.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued 1 #fw Soil name and ; Roadfill ; Sand ; Gravel : Topsoil map symbol Qua. Quarries Ra--------------------!Poor: :Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Raynham : wetness. ; excess fines. ; excess fines. ; wetness. RdA, RdB, ReA, ReB----:Poor: !Improbable: :Improbable: !Poor: Ridgebury ; wetness. ; excess fines. ; excess fines. ; wetness, small stones, area reclaim. Rm--------------------:Poor: :Probable-------------:Improbable: :Poor: Rippowam ; wetness. ; ; too sandy. ; wetness. Rod. Rock outcrop RoC*: Rock outcrop. i Narragansett---------;Good-----------------;Improbable: ;Improbable: ;Fair: excess fines. ! excess fines. : small stones, area reclaim, slope. Holyoke--------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: thin layer, ; excess fines. : excess fines. : large stones, area reclaim. ; ; area reclaim. RoE*: Rock outcrop. Narragansett---------!Poor: !Improbable: ;Improbable: !Poor: slope. ; excess fines. ! excess fines. : slope. I Holyoke--------------!Poor; !Improbable: !Improbable: ;Poor: slope, : excess fines. ; excess fines. : slope, thin layer, ! ! ! large stones, area reclaim. ; ! : area reclaim. Sa-------------------- !Poor: ;Probable-------------!Improbable: ;Poor: Saco ! wetness. ; ; too sandy. ! wetness. Sb--------------------!Poor: :Probable-------------!Improbable: :Poor: Scarboro : wetness. ! : too sandy. ! too sandy, ponding. Sc--------------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Scitico : low strength, : excess fines. : excess fines. : wetness, wetness. : : ! too clayey. SgB-------------------!Fair: !Improbable: :Improbable: :Fair: Scituate ! wetness. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. : small stones, area reclaim. ShB, ShC--------------:Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: :Poor: Scituate : wetness. : excess fines. : excess fines. : small stones. Sr A, SrB--------------:Fair: l Probable-------------!Probable-------------:Poor: Sudbury : wetness. : small stones, too sandy, area reclaim. Su--------------------l Good-----------------!Probable-------------!Improbable: !Poor: Suncook : : : too sandy. ! too sandy. See footnote at end of table. 140 Soil survey TABLE 12.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued Soil name and ! Roadfill - ! Sand ; Gravel ! Topsoil map symbol HgA, HgB, HgC---------lGood----------------- Probable-------------:Probable-------------!Poor: too sandy, Hinckley ! ! area reclaim, small stones. HgD-------------------!Fair: !Probable-------------!Probable-------------]Poor: Hinckley ! slope. ! ! ! slope, too sandy, i small stones. as HgE-------------------!Poor: :Probable-------------!Probable------------ !Poor: Hinckley ! slope. ! ! ! slope, too sandy, ! ! ! small stones. w Hu*: Hinckley-------------:Good----------------- Probable------------- Probable-------------!Poor: too sandy, ! ! area reclaim, ! ! ! small stones. Merrimac-------------:Good-----------------!Probable-------------:Probable-------------!Poor: small stones, area reclaim. Urban land. HvC-------------------!Poor: (Improbable: ;Improbable: !Poor: Holyoke ! thin layer, ! excess fines. : excess fines. ! large stones, area reclaim. ! : ! area reclaim. Lk--------------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Limerick ! wetness. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! wetness. Ma- ------------------!Poor: !Improbable: :Improbable: !Poor: MaybiTi ! wetness, ! excess fines. : excess fines. ! too clayey, ! low strength. wetness. MeA, MeE, MeC---------!Good-----------------:Probable-------------:Probable-------------!Poor: Merrimac ! ! ! ! small stones, area reclaim. MeD-------------------:Fair: :Probable-------------!Probable-------------!Poor: Merrimac ! slo e. ! ! slope, i small stones, area reclaim. MoB, MoC, MsC, MxB, MxC------------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Montauk ! wetness. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! small stones. MxD-------------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Montauk ! wetness, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, slope. ! ! ! small stones. i NaC*: Narragansett---------!Good-----------------!Improbable: !Improbable: !Fair: excess fines. ! excess fines. ! small stones, � ! ! area reclaim, slope. Holyoke--------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: : thin layer, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! large stones, area reclaim. ! ! ! area reclaim. Rock outcrop. i See footnote at end of table. �u 138 Soil survey TABLE 12.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS [Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of e1 ! "good," "fair," "poor," "probable," and "improbable." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] I 1iu Soil name and ! Roadfill ; Sand ; Gravel ; Topsoil map symbol I I AA A B A C---------!Good-----------------1 Probable-------------!Probable-------------!Poor: g ' g ' g ! ! too sandy, Agawam ! ! area reclaim. ! ' I I ! ! I I AmA AmB--------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Fair: Amostown ! low strength, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! small stones. wetness. I , Au*: Amostown-------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Fair: low strength, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! small stones. I wetness. ! ! ! ! Windsor--------------l Good-----------------l Probable-------------!Improbable: !Poor: I ! excess fines. ! too sandy. 1 Urban land. BaA, BaB--------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Good. Belgrade ! low strength, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. I wetness. BoA, Bo B, BoC---------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Boxford ! low strength. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! too clayey. CkB-------------------:Good-----------------!Improbable: !Improbable: !Fair: Charlton ! ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! small stones. CkC-------------------l Good-----------------!Improbable: !Improbable: !Fair: Charlton ! ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, small stones. CmE s r r CmC CnB CnC----!Good-----------------!Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Charlton ! ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! large stones. CnD-------------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: Charlton ! slope. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, large stones. CoE*: Charlton-------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: slope. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, large stones. Gloucester-----------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: slope. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, small stones, area reclaim. CpC*: Charlton-------------!Good-----------------!Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: excess fines. ! excess fines. ! large stones. ! ! ! ! Hollis---------------!Poor: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: thin layer, ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! large stones, Oft area reclaim. ! ! ! area reclaim. � , I , I � CpD*: Charlton-------------!Fair: !Improbable: !Improbable: !Poor: slope. ! excess fines. ! excess fines. ! slope, I ! ! large stones. I I ' See footnote at end of table. on *wpshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 135 TABLE 11.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued Soil name and ! Septic tank ; Sewage lagoon ! Trench ; Area ! Daily cover map symbol ! absorption ; areas ; sanitary ; sanitary ; for landfill fields ; ; landfill ; landfill )ck outcrop. Narragansett-------{Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: w i slope. ; slope, ! slope, ! slope, ! slope. seepage. ; seepage. ! seepage. nolyoke------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: ! slope, ! slope, ! slope, ! slope, ; slope, depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ; thin layer, area reclaim. ------------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: Saco ! flooding, ! flooding, ! flooding, ! flooding, ; wetness. WA ! wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness. ; ! poor filter. ; seepage. ; seepage. S`o------------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: Scarboro ! ponding, ! seepage, ; seepage, ; seepage, ! seepage, poor filter. ; excess humus, ; ponding, ! ponding. ; too sandy, ponding. ! too sandy. ! ! ponding. So------------------;Severe: ;Slight-----------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: Scitico ! wetness, ; ; wetness, ! wetness. ; too clayey, peres slowly. ; ; too clayey. ; ! hard to pack, wetness. SgB, ShB------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Fair: Scituate ! peres slowly, ! seepage. ; wetness. ; seepage. ; small stones, wetness. ; ; ; wetness. S.' '-------- ---;Severe: !Severe: :Severe: ;Severe: ;Fair: Scituate ! peres slowly, ! slope, ; wetness. ! seepage. ! small stones, wetness. ; seepage. ; ; ! wetness. S , SrB------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Poor: dbury ! wetness, ! wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness, ! seepage, poor filter. ! seepage. ; seepage, seepage. ; too sandy, too sandy. ! ! small stones. S'' -----------------;Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: ncook ! flooding, ! flooding, ! flooding, ; seepage, ! seepage, poor filter. ! seepage. ! seepage, ; flooding. ; too sandy. too sandy. S -----------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Poor: ansea ! wetness, ! wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness, ! poor filter. ; excess humus, ! too sandy, ; seepage. ! excess humus, seepage. ; seepage. ! ! seepage. U ; orthents Wa------------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Poor: *01pole ! wetness, ! wetness, i seepage, ; seepage, ; wetness, poor filter. ; seepage. ! wetness, ! wetness. ! seepage, too sandy. ; ; too sandy. WeB-----------------!Severe: !Moderate: ;Moderate: !Moderate: !Fair: 00thersfield ! peres slowly. ; slope. ! wetness. ! wetness. ; small stones, wetness. WeC-----------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Fair: Wethersfield ! eres slowly. ! slope. ! wetness, I wetness, ; small stones, P Y slope. ; slope. ; slope, wetness. See footnote at end of table. 1 134 Soil survey TABLE 11.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued Soil name and ; Septic tank ! Sewage lagoon ! Trench ! Area ! Daily cover map symbol ; absorption areas ; sanitary ; sanitary ! for landfill fields ! landfill ! landfill Pd*: Paxton-------------!Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Fair: I peres slowly. ; slope. ; wetness. ; wetness. ; small stones, wetness. Charlton-----------;Slight-----------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Fair: seepage. ! seepage. ; seepage. ; small stones. I I Urban land. I 1 Pg*• Pits � , I PuA PuB------------;Severe: ;Severe: !Slight-----------!Severe: Good. Pollux ! peres slowly. ; seepage. ! ; seepage. I PuC-----------------!Severe: ;Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Fair: Pollux ; peres slowly. ; slope, ; slope. seepage. slope. seepage. i pv------------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: Pootatuck ; flooding, ! seepage, ; flooding, ! flooding, ; too sandy, wetness, ! wetness, ; seepage, ! seepage, ; seepage, poor filter. ; flooding. ; wetness. ! wetness. thin layer. Quarries Ra------------------!Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: Raynham ! peres slowly, ! wetness. ; wetness. ! wetness. ! wetness. 1 , I wetness. RdA-----------------!Severe: !Slight-----------!Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: Ridgebury ! peres slowly, ! ! wetness. I wetness. ! wetness. wetness. ! ! ! ! ! RdB-----------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Ridgebury ! peres slowly, ! slope. ; wetness. wetness. wetness. ! wetness. ! I I I ! ! 1 I W ReA-----------------!Severe: ;Slight-----------!Severe: !Severe: !Poor: wetness. ; wetness. wetness. Ridgebury , peres slowly, I , I � wetness. ! ; � , I ReB-------—---------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: MR Ridgebury ; peres slowly, ! slope. ! wetness. ! wetness. ! wetness. I wetness. Rm------------------!Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Rippowam ! flooding, I wetness, i wetness, I wetness, ! wetness, wetness, ! flooding, ! flooding, ! flooding, ; too sandy, poor filter. ! seepage. ! seepage. ! seepage. seepage. Ro*. I Rock outcrop WX I I I I 1 RoC*: Rock outcrop. ! ! 1 Narragansett ;Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Fair: g ! slope. ; slope, ; seepage. ! seepage. ! small stones, . ! ! slope, seepage � ! ! , thin layer. Holyoke------------!Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ' !Poor: ll ! + P depth to rock. ! slope, ! depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ! thin layer, ! depth to rock. ! , ! area reclaim. ! ! ! , I See footnote at end of table. P" 132 Soil survey TABLE 11.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued Soil name and I Septic tank : 'Sewage lagoon : Trench : Area ! Daily cover map symbol I absorption ; areas ; sanitary ; sanitary ; for landfill fields ; : landfill ; landfill HgC-----------------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: ;Poor: Hinckley ; poor filter., : slope, : seepage, ; seepage. ; too sandy, seepage. ; too sandy. ; : seepage, small stones. Op HgD, HgE------------!Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Poor: Hinckley : slope, : slope, ! slope, : slope, : slope, ! poor filter. ! seepage. : seepage, : seepage. : too sandy, too sandy. : : seepage. 111 Hu*: Hinckley-----------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Poor: poor filter. : seepage. : seepage, : seepage. : too sandy, too sandy. : ! seepage, small stones. Merrimac-----------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Poor: I poor filter. : seepage. : seepage, ! seepage. ! seepage, too sandy. : : too sandy, small stones. on Urban land. i HvC-----------------(Severe: Severe: !Severe: :Severe: !Poor: Holyoke , depth to rock. : slope, : depth to rock. : depth to rock. : thin layer, depth to rock. ! : : area reclaim. Lk------------------!Severe: :Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: !Poor: Limerick : flooding, I flooding, : flooding, : flooding, : wetness. wetness. I wetness. ! wetness. : wetness. Ma------------------!Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Maybid : ponding, : slope. ! ponding, : ponding. : ponding, peres slowly. : : too clayey. : ! too clayey. "M MeA, MeB------------:Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Merrimac I poor filter. ! seepage. : seepage, : seepage. : seepage, too sand : ! too sandy, y : small stones. OW MeC-----------------:Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: !Poor: Merrimac I poor filter. ! slope, : seepage, : seepage. : seepage, seepage. : too sandy. ! : too sandy, small stones. _No MeD-----------------:Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Poor: Merrimac : slope, : slope, : slope, : slope, : slope, poor filter. : seepage. seepage, : seepage. : seepage, i too sandy. ! ! too sandy. MoB-----------------:Severe: :Moderate: :Slight-----------!Severe: !Poor: Montauk : peres slowly. : slope. : : seepage. I seepage. MoC, MsC------------:Severe: :Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: :Poor: Montauk : peres slowly. : slope. : slope. : seepage. : seepage. MxB-----------------!Severe: :Moderate: !Slight-----------!Severe: :Poor: Montauk I peres slowly. I slope. : : seepage. i seepage. MxC-----------------!Severe: !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Poor: Montauk : peres slowly. : slope. : slope. : seepage. : seepage. MxD-----------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Montauk : peres slowly, : slope. I slope. : slope, : seepage, slope. ! ! seepage. : slope. i See footnote at end of table. OF Oampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 131 TABLE 11.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued t 00 Soil name and 1 Septic tank ! Sewage lagoon ; Trench ; Area I Daily cover map symbol : absorption ; areas : sanitary ; sanitary ! for landfill fields ; : landfill ; landfill 'm------------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Freetown : wetness. : wetness, : wetness, : wetness, : excess humus, excess humus, : excess humus, ! seepage. : wetness. seepage. ! seepage. PRfB-----------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Gloucester : poor filter. ! seepage. : seepage. ! seepage. : seepage, small stones. GfC-----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Poor: "Gloucester : poor filter. : seepage, : seepage. ! seepage. : seepage, slope. : : : small stones. GhB-----------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Gloucester : poor filter. : seepage. : seepage. : seepage. ! small stones, seepage. :hC-----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Poor: Gloucester ! poor filter. I seepage, I seepage. : seepage. I small stones, I slope. : ! : seepage. 40 I xB-----------------:Severe: !Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Gloucester : poor filter. : seepage. : seepage. : seepage. ! small stones, seepage. ~xC-----------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Gloucester : poor filter. : seepage, I seepage. : seepage. : small stones, slope. : : : seepage. xD-----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Gloucester 1 slope, ! seepage, ! slope, ! slope, : slope, poor filter. : slope. I seepage. : seepage. : small stones, seepage. a------------------:Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Good. Hadley : flooding. I flooding, I flooding, : flooding, : I seepage. : seepage, : seepage. ! , : wetness. : i adley-------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Good. flooding. : flooding, ! flooding, : flooding, : seepage. : seepage, : seepage. I : wetness. : Winooski-----------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Good. I flooding, I flooding, I flooding, : flooding, wetness. 1 wetness, : wetness, : wetness, : seepage. ! seepage. : seepage. "Urban land. : "nfB-----------------:Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Poor: Haven : poor filter. 1 seepage. ! seepage, : seepage. ! seepage, too sandy. : : small stones, too sandy. i `nfC-----------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Poor: Haven : poor filter. : slope, ! seepage, : seepage. : seepage, seepage. : too sandy. : : small stones, !1 ! ! ! too sandy. i ngA, HgB------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Poor: Hinckley : poor filter. I seepage. : seepage, : seepage. : too sandy, too sandy. : ! seepage, small stones. See footnote at end of table. 4 IpHampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 129 TABLE 11.--SANITARY FACILITIES Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair," and other terms. Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] Soil name and ; Septic tank ; Sewage lagoon ; Trench ; Area ! Daily cover map symbol ; absorption ! areas ! sanitary ; sanitary ; for landfill fields ; ; landfill ; landfill ; IgA, AgB------------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Poor: Agawam ! poor filter. ! seepage. ! seepage, ; seepage. ! seepage, ! too sandy. ; ! too sandy. I , I I I I gC-----------------'!Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Agawam ; poor filter. ! slope, ! seepage, ! seepage. ; seepage, seepage. ! too sandy. ! ; too sandy. AmA, AmB------------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Fair: Amostown ! wetness, ; seepage, ! wetness. wetness, ! wetness. ww ! peres slowly. ; wetness. ! ; seepage. Au*: I � Amostown-----------;Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: air: wetness, ! seepage, ! wetness. ! wetness, ! wetness. peres slowly. ! wetness. ! ! seepage. I Windsor------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Poor: peres slowly. ! seepage. ! too sandy. ! seepage. ! seepage. Urban land. EaA, BaB------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Fair: Belgrade ! wetness, ; wetness, ! wetness, ! wetness, ! wetness. peres slowly. ! seepage. ! seepage. ! seepage. SoA-----------------!Severe: !Slight-----------!Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Boxford ! wetness, ! ! wetness, ! wetness. ! too clayey, peres slowly. , , too clayey. I wetness. I � loB-----------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Severe: !Poor: Boxford ! wetness, i slope. I wetness, ; wetness. ! too clayey, peres slowly. ! ! too clayey. ! ! wetness. q*oC-----------------!Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: !Poor: Boxford ! wetness, ! slope. I wetness, wetness. ! too clayey, ! peres slowly. ! ! too clayey. wetness. CkB-----------------:Slight-----------!Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Fair: Charlton ; ; seepage. ! seepage. ! seepage. ! small stones. ' , I kC-----------------!Moderate: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Fair: Charlton ! slope. ! seepage, ! seepage. ! seepage. ! slope, I ! slope. small stones. ! ; I � mB-----------------!Slight-----------!Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: Fair: Charlton ! ; seepage. ! seepage. ! seepage. ! small stones. CmC-----------------!Moderate: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Fair: XwCharlton ! slope. ! seepage, ! seepage. ; seepage. ! slope, ! ! slope. ! ' small stones. CnB-----------------:Slight-----------!Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Fair: Charlton ! ! seepage. ! seepage. ! seepage. I small stones. ! I I I I nC-----------------!Moderate: ;Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Fair: Charlton ! slope. ! seepage, ! seepage. ! seepage. ! slope, slope. ! ' small stones. I , •AnD-----------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Poor: ?` Charlton I slope. ! seepage, ! seepage, ! seepage, ! slope. I slope. ! slope. ! slope. I � ' See footnote at end of table. I ! PO 126 Soil survey on TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued I I Soil name and ; Shallow : Dwellings ; Dwellings ; Small ; Local roads ; Lawns and on map symbol : excavations ; without ; with ; commercial ; and streets ; landscaping basements ; basements buildings I I I I Sc----------------:Severe: :Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: Severe: ;Severe: Scitico ; wetness. ; wetness. ; wetness. ; wetness. ; low strength, ; wetness. wetness, frost action. I I I I I I SgB---------------;Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Scituate : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : slope, : frost action, : wetness. wetness. : wetness. I I I I I ShB---------------:Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Scituate : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, : frost action, : small stones, slope. : wetness. : large stones. ShC---------------:Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: Scituate : wetness. : wetness, : wetness. ; slope. : wetness, : slope, slope. : : : slope, : small stones, frost action. : large stones. SrA---------------!Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight. Sudbury : wetness, I wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, I cutbanks cave. : : : : frost action. -' SrB---------------:Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight. Sudbury : wetness, I wetness. : wetness. : slope, : wetness, cutbanks cave. : : : wetness. : frost action. I I I I I 1 ` Su----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Moderate: Suncook : cutbanks cave. : flooding. : flooding. : flooding. : flooding. : flooding, droughty. �Sw----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Swansea : wetness, : wetness, : wetness. : wetness, : wetness, : wetness, excess humus, : low strength. : : low strength. : low strength, : excess humus. cutbanks cave.: : : : frost action. I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I Ud*. Udorthents I I I 1 Wa----------------:Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Walpole wetness, I wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, : wetness. cutbanks cave. : : : : frost action. I I I I I I I I I I 1 s WeB---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate:, :Moderate: :Moderate: -:Slight. Wethersfield : dense layer, : wetness. : wetness. I wetness, I wetness, wetness. : : : slope. : frost action. I I I 1 1 I �eC---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: Wethersfield : dense layer, : wetness, : wetness, : slope. : wetness, : slope. slope, : slope. : slope. : : slope, wetness. : : : : frost action. I I I I I I 4fB---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Wethersfield : dense layer, : wetness. : wetness. : slope, : frost action, : large stones. wetness. : : : wetness. ; wetness. I 1 I I i I MJfC---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: Wethersfield : slope, : slope, : slope, : slope. : slope, : slope, dense layer, : wetness. : wetness. : : frost action, : large stones. wetness. : : : : wetness. I I I I I I W1gB---------------;Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Wethersfield : dense layer, : wetness. : wetness. : slope, : frost action, :. large stones. : wetness. : : : wetness. : wetness. WgC---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: Po Wethersfield : slope, : slope, : slope, : slope. : slope, : slope, : dense layer, : wetness. : wetness. : : frost action, : large stones. wetness. : : : : wetness. 40 See footnote at end of table. WHampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 125 TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued 40 Soil name and : Shallow : Dwellings : Dwellings : Small ; Local roads : Lawns and map symbol ; excavations ; without : with : commercial : and streets ; landscaping basements : basements ; buildings I I I I 1 I I , 1 I 1 I I 'its 1 1 ' PuA---------------!Slight---------;Slight---------!Slight---------!Slight---------:Moderate: ;Slight. Pollux : ; : : : low strength, W ; ; : frost action. ._B---------------:Slight---------:Slight---------!Slight---------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight. Pollux ; : : : slope. : low strength, : frost action. I I I I I I C---------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: _ollux : slope. : slope. : slope. : slope. : low strength, : slope. slope, frost action. : I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I ----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: .00tatuck : cutbanks cave, : flooding. : flooding, : flooding. : flooding. I flooding. wetness. wetness. : : ' I I uarries I 1 1 Ra----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: .6aynham : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. I wetness. : frost action, : wetness. wetness. , , 1 I : i I huA, RdE, ReA, , , 1 ReB--------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: .Ridgebury : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, : wetness. , I frost action. ---------' f 1 ' ' 1 hiii------- :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Rippowam : wetness, : flooding, : flooding, : flooding, 1 flooding, : wetness, cutbanks cave. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, I flooding. I frost action. I I I I Roy. Rock outcrop : I , >ck outcrop. Narragansett-----:Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: cutbanks cave. : slope. : slope. : slope. : slope, : slope. frost action. Holyoke----------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: (Severe: :Severe: :Severe: : depth to rock. : depth to rock. : depth to rock.: depth to rock, : depth to rock. : thin layer. : slope. R I I i 1 I Hock outcrop. I 1 #*rragansett-----:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: slope, : slope. : slope. : slope. : slope. : slope. I cutbanks cave. : I 1 Holyoke----------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: on : slope, : slope, : slope, slope, : slope, I slope, depth to rock. : depth to rock. : depth to rock. : depth to rock. : depth to rock. : thin layer. Sa----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Saco : wetness, : flooding, : flooding, : flooding, : flooding, : flooding, cutbanks cave. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, I wetness. frost action. : Sb----------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: ponding. Scarboro : cutbanks cave : : ponding. : ponding. : ponding, : ponding, ponding. frost action. : excess humus. I � ' I , I I See footnote at end of table. Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 123 TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued 40 Soil name and ; Shallow ! Dwellings : Dwellings I Small I Local roads : Lawns and map symbol ; excavations ; without ! with I commercial : and streets landscaping basements : basements buildings inckley---------!Severe: !Slight---------!Slight---------!Moderate: :Slight------ Moderate: small stones cutbanks cave. ! slope. I ! droughty. errimac-------- :Severe: l Slight---------:Slight---------!Moderate: !Slight---------!Slight. ! cutbanks cave. : : : slope. � Urban land. "C---------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: olyoke ! depth to rock. ! depth to rock. : depth to rock. ! depth to rock, : depth to rock. ! thin layer. slope. --- - ----------:Severe: !Severe: Severe: :Severe: 1Severe: g' :Severe:flooding, imerick ! wetness. ! flooding, , flooding, , flooding, , flood in i wetness. wetness. wetness. ! wetness wetness. frost action. ----------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: aybid : ponding. ! ponding. ! ponding. ! ponding. ! ponding, : ponding. low strength, frost action. -----------:Severe: !Slight---------:Slight---------!Slight---------:Slight---------:Slight. errimac ! cutbanks cave. ! MeB---------------:Severe: :Slight---------:Slight---------!Moderate: !Slight---------,Slight. Merrimac ! cutbanks cave. ! ! : slope. 40 C_______________!Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: errimac ! cutbanks cave. : slope. ! slope. ! slope. slope. I slope. MeD---------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: errimac ! slope, : slope. ! slope. : slope. ! slope. ! slope. ! cutbanks cave. ! I MOB-------------- !Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: !Slight. Montauk ! dense layer, : wetness. ! wetness. ! wetness, ! wetness, slope. ! frost action. ! wetness. ! � , , I ,C---------------:Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: ! Montauk ! dense layer, : wetness, ! wetness, ! slope. � wetness, slope. wetness, : slope. ! slope. : : slope, slope. frost action. ! ! I C---------------!Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: :Moderate: !Moderate: small stones Montauk ! dense layer, ! wetness, ! wetness, ! slope. ! wetness, , slope, ! large stones, ! wetness, , slope. ! slope. � � � ! slope. : frost action. : slope. 1 B---------------!Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: Montauk ! dense layer, : wetness. I wetness. I wetness, ! wetness, ! small stones, wetness. ! ! : slope. : frost action. ! large stones. -----------------:Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: ontauk ! dense layer, ! wetness, ! wetness, I slope. ! wetness, ! small stones, slope, ! large stones, wetness, ! slope. slope. p , � ! ! frost action. : slope. slope. I„ ---------------:Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe !Severe ontauk ! slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. ! slope. ! slope. NaC*: Allarragansett-----!Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: : slope. cutbanks cave. ! slope. ! slope. I slope. 1 slope, frost 00 See footnote at end of table. �w 122 Soil survey TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and ; Shallow I Dwellings ; Dwellings ; Small ; Local roads ; Lawns and map symbol I excavations ; without ; with ; commercial ; and streets ; landscaping basements ; basements buildings I I 1 I I I GfB---------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: ;Moderate: !Moderate: ;Moderate: Gloucester ; cutbanks cave. : large stones. ; large stones. ; slope, ; large stones. : small stones, large stones. ; ; droughty. I I I GfC---------------;Severe: ;Moderate: !Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: Gloucester ; cutbanks cave. ; slope, ; slope, I slope. ; slope, ; slope, large stones. ; large stones. ; ; large stones. ; small stones, droughty. I I I I I I GhB---------------,;Severe: ;Moderate:: Moderrate: ;Moderate: :Moderate: ;Moderate: Gloucester ; cutbanks cave. ; large stones. ; large stones. ; large stones ; large stones. ; small stones slope. ; ; droughty. -I ' ' ' ' I GhC------ ---- ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: Gloucester ; cutbanks cave. ; large stones, ; large stones, ; slope. ; slope, ; slope, slope. ; slope. ; ; large stones. ; small stones, droughty. I GxB---------------;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: Gloucester I cutbanks cave. ; large stones. ; large stones. large stones, ; large stones. ; large stones. ! ; slope. I I I I I I I I I I GxC---------------;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Severe: Gloucester ; cutbanks cave. ; large stones, ; large stones, ; slope. ; slope, : large stones. slope. ; slope. ; ; large stones. ; GxD---------------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: Gloucester ; slope, ; slope. ; slope. ; slope. ; slope. ; slope, { cutbanks cave. ; ; ; ; : large stones. I Ha----------------;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Moderate: NO Hadley ; flooding. ; flooding. ; flooding. I flooding. ; flooding, I flooding. frost action. ; Hadley-----------;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Moderate: flooding. ; flooding. ; flooding. I flooding. flooding, ; flooding. frost action. ; I I I I I I I I I I I Winooski---------;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Moderate: flooding. ; flooding. ! flooding, ; flooding. ; flooding, ; flooding, wetness. ; ; frost action. ; wetness. I I 1 I I Urban land. "M HfB---------------;severe: ;Slight---------;slight---------;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Slight. Haven ; cutbanks cave. ; ; ; slope. ; frost action. ; -----I I I ' ' I HfC---------- ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: Haven ; cutbanks cave. ; slope. ; slope. 1 slope. ; slope, ; slope. frost action. ; I I I , HgA---------------;Severe: ;Slight---------:Slight---------;Slight---------;Slight---------:Moderate: Hinckley ; cutbanks cave. ; ; ; ; small stones, droughty. , I I HgB---------------;Severe: !Slight---------;Slight---------;Moderate: ;Slight---------;Moderate: Hinckley ; cutbanks cave. ; ; ; slope. ; ; small stones, droughty. I I HgC---------------;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: Hinckley ; cutbanks cave. ; slope. : slope. ; slope. ; slope. I small stones, droughty, I slope. I I HgD, HgE----------;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: Hinckley ; slope, ; slope. ; slope. ; slope. I slope. ; slope. I I cutbanks cave. ; ; I I I I • See footnote at end of table. 120 Soil survey TABLE 10.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT [Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] I i I I I I I Soil name and ! Shallow ; Dwellings Dwellings ; Small ! Local roads ; Lawns and map symbol ! excavations ; without ; with ; commercial ! and streets ; landscaping basements basements ! buildings : I ! I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I AgA---------------:Severe: !Slight---------!Slight---------!Slight---------!Slight---------!Slight. Agawam ! cutbanks cave. ! 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 AgB---------------!Severe: !Slight---------!Slight---------!Moderate: !Slight---------:Slight. Agawam ! cutbanks cave. ! ; ; slope. : I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I AgC---------------!Severe: :Moderate: ;Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: Agawam ; cutbanks cave.! slope. ; slope. slope. ; slope. : slope. I I I 1 I I ! I ! AmA---------------I;Severe: !Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Amostown ; wetness. ; wetness. I wetness. ; wetness. ; frost action, ! wetness. low strength, wetness. ; I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I AmB---------------:Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: :Moderate: ;Moderate: !Moderate: Amostown ; wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : slope, : frost action, : wetness. wetness. ! low strength, I I I 1 I wetness. : I I I I I I I I I I Au*: Amostown---------:Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: wetness. ! wetness. ! wetness. : wetness. ! frost action, ! wetness. low strength, : : wetness. I I I I I Windsor----------I:Severe: :Slight---------!Slight---------:Slight---------:Slight---------:Moderate: : cutbanks cave. ! : ! : ! droughty. I I I I I I I I I I 1 I Urban land. I I I ! ! I BaA---------------!Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: MR Belgrade ! wetness, : wetness. ! wetness. ! wetness. ! frost action. ! wetness. cutbanks cave. : ! ! ! ! ! ! BaB---------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: :Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: Belgrade : wetness, ! wetness. ! wetness. ! slope, ! frost action. ! wetness. ON ! cutbanks cave. : ! : wetness. ! : I I ' I I I I I I BoA---------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: :Moderate: Boxford ! wetness. ! wetness, ! wetness. : wetness, ! low strength, : wetness. shrink-swell. ! : shrink-swell. ! frost action. I I I I ! ! I 1 I I /11! BoB---------------:Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: Boxford ! wetness. ! wetness, ! wetness. ! wetness, ! low strength, : wetness. shrink-swell. : : slope, ! frost action. shrink-swell. I 1 ! ! I BoC---------------I!Severe: :Moderate: !Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Moderate: Boxford ! wetness. : wetness, ! wetness. ! slope. ! low strength, I wetness, slope. : ! ! frost action. : slope. I I I I I I ! 1 I I CkB---------------I l Slight---------l Slight---------:Slight---------!Moderate: !Slight---------!Slight. Charlton : ! ! ! slope. I I I I I I I I I 1 I CkC---------------,!Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: Charlton ! slope. : slope. ! slope. ! slope. ! slope. ! slope. CmB---------------:Slight---------l Slight---------:Slight---------:Moderate: :Slight---------!Moderate: Charlton ! ! ! slope. ! ! large stones. 1 I I ! ! I CmC---------------!Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: ps Charlton ! slope. : slope. ! slope. ! slope. 1 slope. ! slope, : large stones. I I I I I CnB---------------:Slight---------l Slight---------!Slight---------!Moderate: !Slight---------!Moderate: Charlton ! ! ! : slope. ! ! large stones. I I ! ! I I See footnote at end of table. 118 Soil survey on TABLE 9•--WILDLIFE HABITAT--Continued Potential for habitat elements ; Potential as habitat for-- Soil name and ; Grain : ;Wild : ; : ; : : : map symbol : and :Grasses:herba-:Hard- :Conif-:Shrubs;Wetland;Shallow:Openland ;Woodland : Wetland : seed : and : ceous: wood : erous: :plants ; water ;wildlife ;wildlife ;wildlife I crops :legumes:plants:trees :plants: : : areas : I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Sc-----------------:Poor ;Fair. :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- :Good ;Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair. Scitico SgB----------------;Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Good :Good :Very Scituate : : : : : : : : poor. : : : poor. ShB----------------:Very :Very :Good ;Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Poor :Fair :Very Scituate poor. poor. I poor. ' , , poor. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ShC----------------:Very :Very :Good :Good :Good : --- :Very :Very :Poor :Fair :Very Scituate : poor. : poor. : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I I 1 SrA----------------:Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Poor :Good :Good :Poor. Sudbury : I I I I I I I I I I I SrB----------------:Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Good ;Good :Very Sudbury Y , , , , I I 1 I poor. , , I Poor. I I I I I I I I I Su-----------------:Poor :Fair :Fair :Poor :Poor : --- :Very :Very :Fair :Poor :Very I" Suncook : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. 1 I I I I I I I I I I Sw-----------------:Very :Poor :Poor :Poor :Poor I --- :Good :Good :Poor :Poor :Good. Swansea : poor. pa Ud* I I I I I I I I I I Udorthents : Wa-----------------:Poor :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- :Good :Good :Fair :Fair :Good. Walpole : No WeB----------------:Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Good :Good :Very Wethersfield : : : ; : : : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I I I I I I WeC----------------:Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Very :Very :Good :Good :Very on Wethersfield : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I I I I I WfB----------------:Very :Poor :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Poor :Good :Very Wethersfield : poor. : : : : : : : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I I I I I No WfC----------------:Very :Poor :Good :Good :Good : --- :Very :Very :Poor :Good :Very Wethersfield : poor. : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I WgB----------------:Very :Very :Good :Good :Good --- :Poor :Very :Poor :Fair :Very Wethersfield : poor. : poor. : : : : poor. : : : poor. PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , : I I WgC----------------:Very :Very :Good :Good :Good --- :Very :Very :Poor :Fair :Very I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 Wethersfield , poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. I poor. , I I poor. I I 1 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I WhA----------------:Very :Poor :Poor :Poor :Poor ; --- :Good :Fair :Poor :Poor :Fair. Pff Whitman : poor. : I I I 1 I I I I I WnA, WnB, WnC, WnD-:Poor :Poor :Fair :Poor :Poor --- :Very :Very :Poor :Poor :Very Windsor : : : : : : : poor. poor. : : : poor. 1 I I I I I I I I I I WoA, WoB, WoC------:Poor :Fair :Fair :Poor :Poor : --- :Poor :Very :Fair :Poor :Very Windsor : ; : : : : : poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I I I 1 Wp*: I I I I I I I YY Windsor-----------:Very :Poor :Fair :Poor :Poor : --- :Very :Very :Poor :Poor :Very At : poor. : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 Scitico-----------:Poor :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- :Good :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair. 1 I I I I I Amostown----------:Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Good :Good :Very poor. : : : poor. I I I I I I See footnote at end of table. 1 -Iwnpshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 117 TABLE 9•--WILDLIFE HABITAT--Continued Potential for habitat elements I Potential as habitat for-- go Soil name and : Grain ; !Wild map symbol : and lGrasses:herba-;Hard- :Conif-!Shrubs:Wetland:Shallow:Openland ;Woodland ; Wetland : seed : and : ceous! wood : erous! !plants : water :wildlife !wildlife !wildlife ! , I , !plants! I crops legumes,plants,trees ,plants, I areas , �:.. ;----------------,Very !Very !Good !Good :Good , --- !Poor !Very !Poor !Fair :Very xton ' ' ' poor. , poor. , , , , , , poor. , , , poor. cC, PcD, PcE------'Ver y 'Ver y ,Good 'Good !Good l --- !Ver y ,Ver y 'Poor (Fair ,Ver y OMxton , poor. : poor. ! : : ; poor. 1 poor. 1 : : poor. • 1 , , 1 I 1 I I , 1 , Good! Paxton------------!Fair !Good :Good :Good i --- !Poor :Very 'Good IGood Vp poor. oor. I , I , , arlton----------!Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor !Very :Good :Good !Very , 1 1 1 poor. i ! poor. % I Urban land. MR IS. ,F s IuA, PuB-----------:Good !Good !Good !Good :Good I --- !Poor !Very :Good :Good !Very §Llux , , , , : ! , : poor. , poor. t'- ----------------!Fair !Good :Good !Good :Good : --- :Very !Very :Good :Good :Very Pollux ' ! 1 I I I I I poor. , poor. I 1 I poor. I 1 ----------------,Poor !Fair :Fair !Good !Good --- :Poor !Poor !Fair !Good :Poor. F )tatuck u* Quarries a` •---------------!Fair !Fair !Fair :Fair !Fair !Good !Fair !Fair !Fair ,Fair. P=_;nham dA------------ :;. ----!Poor !Poor :Fair !Fair :Fair I - :Good !Fair !Fair :Fair :Fair. RMgebury d-- ---------------!Poor !Poor I : ,Fair ,Fair ,Fair , --- ,Poor ,Very ,Fair ,Fair . ,Very �1 Rid ebur g Y ! ! ! I ! I ! I pOOr. : 1 1 poor. e ---------------t I ! 1 ! : I ! 1 : : ,Very ,Very ,Fair ,Fair ,Fair , --- ,Good ,Fair ,Poor ,Fair ,Fair. l R gebur 1 y i poor. i y !Fair poor. eB---------------- Very !Very 'Fair !Fair ! --- :Poor !Very :Poor :Fair :Very ! ! I I I I 1 ! I Ridgebury : poor. : poor. 1 : poor. 1 1 p oor. ! I ! I 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! ! m- _-------- !Poor , ! ! I 1 ! ! ------ ,Fair ,Fair ,Fair (Fair , --- ,Good ,Good ,Fair ,Fair ,Good. � Ri owam 'Yp 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I 0..ii,, I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I Rik outcrop o(� RoE*: Rock outcrop. 1 I ! I I ! ! ! I ! G N •agansett------!Very !Very !Good !Good :Good : --- :Very !Very !Poor !Fair !Very I 1 I I ! : 1 ! 1 I poor. , poor. , I ! ! , poor. , poor. , ! ! poor. iiolyoke-----------:Very !Very !Fair !Poor !Poor : --- :Very !Very :Very poor:Poor :Very : poor. ! poor. ! : : : ! poor. : poor. ! : : poor. I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I a- ------!Very !Poor !Poor :Poor :Poor : --- :Good !Good !Poor !Poor :Good. Sa'o ! poor. c ----------------!Very !Poor :Poor :Poor :Poor : --- :Good :Fair :Poor !Poor !Fair. 1 ! 1 ! I 1 ! I I ! 1 5 `'boro , poor. See footnote at end of table. J, lip 116 Soil survey on TABLE 9.--WILDLIFE HABITAT--Continued Potential for habitat elements ; Potential as habitat for-- Soil name and : Grain : :W'i-ld : : : : : : : map symbol ; and lGrasses;herba-lHard- :Conif-:Shrubs:Wetland:Shallew!Openland !Woodland ; Wetland seed : and ! ceous! wood ! erous! :plants ; water !wildlife :wildlife :wildlife crops ;legumes:plants:trees !plants! : : areas : _: : Merrimac----------:Fair :Fair !Fair :Fair :Fair I --- :Very :Very :Fair :Fair ,Very poor. , poor. ,, P oor. Urban land. Om , HvC------- ------!Very Very ,Poor ,Fair ,Poor ,Poor , --- ,Very ,Very ,Poor ,Poor ,Very Holyoke : poor. ! : : : : ! poor. : poor. : ! : poor. Lk-----------------!;Poor :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- !Good :Good :Fair :Fair :Good. Limerick Ma-----------------!Very :Poor !Poor :Poor !Poor : --- !Good :Poor ;Poor !Poor !Fair. Maybid ! poor. : MeA, MeB, MeC------:Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- ;Very. :Very :Fair :Fair :Very Merrimac : : : : ! ! : poor. : poor. : : : poor. -----, , MeD---------- ;Poor :Fair :Fair :Fair :Fair : --- :Very :Very :Fair :Fair ;Very Merrimac : : ; : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. ON MoB----------------!Fair :Good :Good :Good !Good : --- :Poor !Very !Good !Good :Very Montauk : : : : ! : : : poor. : : : poor. MoC----------------:Fair !Good :Good !Good :Good ! --- :Very !Very !Good !Good :Very po Montauk : : : : : : ! poor. : poor. : : : poor. --------- MsC------- :Very :Poor :Good :Good :Good : --- :Very !Very :Poor :Good ;Very Montauk , poor. , , , , , , poor. , poor. poor , MxB----------------!Very :Very !Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor !Very :Poor :Fair :Very Montauk : poor. : poor. : : : : : : poor. : : : poor. ------I , MxC, P7xD----- :Very :Very !Good :Good :Good : --- :Very :,Very :Poor :Fair :Very Montauk , poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. 1 poor. �, P oor. NaC*, NaD*: Narragansett------:Very :Very :Good :Good !Good : --- :Very !Very :Poor :Fair !Very poor. ! poor. : : : : : poor. : poor. : : 1 poor. Holyoke-----------!Very !Very !Fair :Poor !Poor : --- :Very :Very ;Very poor:Poor :Very poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. , poor. ,, P oor. Rock outcrop. ------ , NgA---------- :Good :Good !Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor ;Poor :Good ;Good :Poor. Ninigret NgB----------------!Fair !Good :Good !Good !Good : - :Poor !Very !Good :Good :Very Ninigret : : : : : ! : : poor. : : poor. PaB----------------!Fair :Good :Good :Good :Good : --- :Poor !Very :Good :Good !Very Paxton : : : : : : : : poor. : : : poor. PaC----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good :Good : --- :Very !Very :Good !Good :Very , Paxton : : : : : : : poor. 1 poor. : : poor. PaD----------------!Poor !Fair !Good :Good ',Good ! --- :Very !Very :Fair :Good !Very Paxton : : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. ' PbB----------------!Very :Poor :Good !Good :Good : --- :Poor :Very :Poor :Good !Very Paxton : poor. : : : ; : : : poor. ! : : poor. ----------I PbC, PbD-----------:Very :Poor :Good :Good :Good ! --- :Very :Very :Poor :Good :Very Paxton : poor. : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : ! poor. See footnote at end of table. Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 115 TABLE 9.--WILDLIFE HABITAT--Continued : Potential for habitat elements ; Potential as habitat for-- Soil name and : Grain : :Wild : : : : : 1 : map symbol ; and !Grasses:herba-:Hard- !Conif-:Shrubs:Wetland:Shallow!Openland ;Woodland ; Wetland : seed : and : ceous! wood : erous! :plants : water :wildlife !wildlife :wildlife : crops :legumes:plants:trees !plants! : : areas 1 i I I I 1 I I I I I • harlton----------:Very !Very :Good :Good :Good : --- :Very :Very !Poor !Fair :Very I I , , , , , , 1 I , poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. , poor. , , , poor. �ollis------------:Very :Very !Fair !Poor !Poor : --- :Very !Very !Very poor:Poor !Very poor. poor. : : : : poor. , , , , , , p oor. poor. p 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I C*, CrE*: Charlton----------,Very Very ,Good ,Good ,Good , --- ,Very !Very ,Poor ,Fair ,Very I , I ! , I I , poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. , poor. , , , poor. ock outcrop. Hollis------------:Very !Very :Fair :Poor :Poor : --- :Very :Very :Very poor:Poor !Very poor. , Poor. , , , , , Poor. , poor. , , , poor. Is` A : : : : : : : : : : : 'veerfield �mPs E A----------------',Poor ,,Fair I I Fair ,I Fair 1 I Fair I --- I I Fair ,I Fair ,I Fair ,I Fair ,I Fair. 'f Enosbur 8 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I ----------------!Poor !Fair !Fair !Fair !Fair : --- :Poor :Very :Fair :Fair :Very iosburg , , 1 I I I 1 � poor. I , I poor. !! Fm-----------------I Very I I Poor I I Poor I I Poor I I Poor , --- ,1 Good I 1 Good !Poor ,I Poor 1, Good. eetown : poor. G- 3, GfC-----------:Poor !Fair !Fair !Poor !Poor : --- :Very !Very !Poor :Poor !Very uiou Lester ' ' ' ' poor. I poor. , , , poor. --------' : :Poor --- :Very !Very !Poor !Poor !Very G�, GhC--- ,Very ,Poor ,Poor Poor Poor oucester Poor. , , , , , , poor. , poor. I I I poor. GZE, GxC, GxD------:Very :Very :Poor :Poor !Poor I --- :Very :Very !Very poor:Poor !Very Gloucester , poor. , poor. , , , , , poor. , poor. I , , poor. H ----------------!Good !Good !Good :Good !Good : --- :Poor !Very :Good !Good !Very I , ! , I , I , 1 dley I I I I I I , I poor. I 1 , poor. Hd*: *$dley------------!Good 'Good :Good !Good (Good ! --- !Poor Wery :Good !Good !Very , Winooski----------:Good !Good :Good !Good !Good : --- :Poor !Poor !Good !Good :Poor. I I I 1 I i I I I I Wan land. H: ----------------!Fair !Good !Good :Good :Good --- :Poor !Very :Good :Good ! Very Haven poor. poor. H uh---------------!Fair :Good !Good :Good :Good : --- :Very !Very :Good !Good !Very i I I I I , , I I I F= ✓en I I I , I I I poor. , poor. : I I poor. ii 1 I ! I I I 1 1 I 1 HgA, HgB, HgC, HgD-:Poor !Poor :Poor !Poor !Poor : --- :Very :Very !Poor :Poor :Very Hinckley : : : : : : : poor. : poor. : : : poor. HE ----------------:Very !Poor :Poor !Poor !Poor : --- !Very :Very :Poor !Poor :Very ! , 11 1 I I I 1 1 , f-, �ckley , poor. , , , , , , poor. , poor. , , , poor. Hu*: • ----------1 !Poor !Poor I :Very I 1 I f�/ilekley ,Poor ,Poor ,Poor ,Poor ,-Poor , --- ,Very ,Very ,Poor ,Poor ,Very poor. : Poor. : : : poor. r;l See footnote at end of table. �I IJ l' 114 Soil survey TABLE 9.--WILDLIFE HABITAT [See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "very poor." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] O Potential for habitat elements ! Potential as habitat for-- Soil name and ; Grain ! !Wild ! ! ! ! ! map symbol ! and !Grasseslherba-!Hard- !Conif-1 Shrubs:Wetland:ShallowlOpenland ;Woodland ! Wetland #* ! seed ! and ! ceous! wood ! erous! !plants ! water !wildlife !wildlife !wildlife I I 1 I I areas crops I,legumesi plants,I trees ,plants, , , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 AgA----------------!Good !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very ;Good !Good !Very 1 I I I I I I I I I I I !� Agawam I I I I I I I poor. , I I p oor. I I I I I I I I I AgB----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very !Good !Good !Very I I I I I I I I I I I Agawam 1 r 1 I 1 , I , poor. I I I P oor. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 AgC----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Good !Good !Very Agawam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! poor. AmA----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Poor !Good !Good !Poor. Amostown ! go AmB----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very !Good !Good !Very Amostown ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I I I Au*: ! Amostown----------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Poor !Good !Good !Poor. Windsor----- -----I Poor :Fair !Fair :Poor !Poor --- :Poor (Very !Fair !Poor !Very I I I I I I I poor. I I I poor. I I I Urban land. ! I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I BaA----------------!Good !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Poor !Good !Good !Poor. Belgrade ! BaB----------------!Fair !Good ;Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Good !Good !Very Belgrade ! ; ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I I I I I BoA----------------!Good !Good !Good !Good ;Good ! --- ;Poor !,Poor !Good !Good !Poor. BOxford ! BoB----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very !Good !Good !Very I I I I I I 1 I I I I Boxford , , , 1 I , 1 , poor. , I I P oor. I I I I I I I I I 1 , BoC----------------I I Fair I I Good I I Good I I Good I I Good , --- I I Very I I Very I,Good 1 I Good I 1 Very I I I I I I I I IIOXford , I , I I I I poor. , poor. , I I poor. I I I I CkB----------------!Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very !Good !Good !Very Charlton ! ; ! ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I I I I ---------I CkC------- !Fair !Good !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Good !Good !Very I I I I I I I I I I , Charlton , I , I 1 1 , poor. , poor. , I I poor. I I, I I I I I I CmB----------------,Very ,Poor ,Good !Good !Good I --- :Poor ,Very ,Poor IGood ,Very Charlton ! poor. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I ! ! ! CmC----------------!Very !Poor !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Poor !Good !Very Charlton ! poor. ! ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I 1 I 1 ! ---------I I I I I I I I I I CnII------- !Very !Very !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Poor !Very !Poor !Fair !Very Charlton ! poor. I poor. I ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I CnC, CnD-----------!Very !Very !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Poor !Fair !Very Charlton ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I I I I CoE*: ! Charlton----------!Very !Very !Good !Good !Good ! --- !Very !Very !Poor !Fair !Very poor. ! poor. ! ! ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! poor. I I I I I I I I I I Gloucester--------!Very !Very !Poor !Poor !Poor ! --- !Very !Very !Very poorlPoor !Very ! poor. ! ! ! poor. ! poor. ! poor. ! ! ! ! ! P oor. P I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I ! I ! I See footnote at end of table. 4ampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 111 TABLE 8.--RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT--Continued IM Soil name and : Camp areas ; Picnic areas ; Playgrounds : Paths and trails : Golf fairways I map symbol I I , I I I I I I Holyoke--------------;Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: :Slight------------:Severe: : depth to rock, : depth to rock, : slope, thin layer. : large stones. I large stones. : large stones, : depth to rock. )E*: Lock outcrop. ' ' I I I I I Narragansett---------:Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: 1 : slope, : slope. : slope, : slope. : slope, : large stones. : : large stones. : : large stones. Holyoke--------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: : slope, : slope, : slope, : slope. : slope, !# : depth to rock, : depth to rock, : large stones, : : thin layer. : large stones. : large stones. : depth to rock. Sa--------------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Saco : flooding, : wetness, : flooding, : wetness, : flooding, !! : wetness, : excess humus. : wetness, : excess humus. : wetness. excess humus. excess humus. : : : : ' Sb--------------------:Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: Scarboro : ponding, : ponding, : ponding, : ponding, : ponding, : excess humus. : excess humus. : excess humus. : excess humus. : excess humus. I ------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Scitico : wetness, : wetness, : wetness, : wetness. : wetness. : peres slowly'. : peres slowly. : peres slowly. : B-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: '-cituate : wetness, : wetness, : slope, : wetness. : wetness. : peres slowly. : peres slowly. : small stones, : I wetness. , I B-------------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: ' cituate : large stones. : large stones. : large stones, : wetness. : small stones, I I : small stones. : : large stones. I I � , C-------------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: cituate : large stones. : large stones. : slope, : wetness. : slope, : large stones, : : small stones, : small stones. : large stones. ; A-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight------------ :Slight. I - udbury : wetness. : wetness. : wetness, : small stones. f I I ' ST-B -------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight------------:Slight. udbury : wetness. : wetness. : slope, : I : wetness, small stones. : I I I ----------------:Severe: :Slight----------:Moderate: :Slight------------:Moderate: ancook : flooding. : : flooding. : : flooding, : droughty. Sw--------------------:Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: �ransea : wetness, : wetness, : wetness, : wetness, I wetness, : excess humus. : excess humus. : excess humus. : excess humus. I excess humus. U,_ Udorthents I � I yP .-------------------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: alpole : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. : wetness. I � See footnote at end of table. 110 Soil survey TABLE 8.--RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and ; Camp areas ; Picnic areas ; Playgrounds ; Paths and trails ; Golf fairways 1 I map symbol ; I � , I PcD-------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: ;Moderate: :Severe: Paxton ! slope, : large stones, : slope, ! slope. ! slope. I : large stones. ! slope. : large stones. PcE-------------------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Paxton ! slope, ! large stones, : slope, : slope. : slope. I : large stones. : slope. : large stones. I Pd*: Paxton---------------!Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Slight------------:Slight. w : peres slowly. ! peres slowly. : slope, peres slowly, small stones. I Charlton-------------!Slight----------:Slight----------:Moderate: !Slight------------:Slight. go ! ! slope, small stones.- : I I Urban land. Pg*. Pits PuA-------------------:Slight----------!Slight----------:Slight----------!Slight------------!Slight. I I Pollux : ! PuB-------------------:Slight----------!Slight----------:Moderate: !Slight------------:Slight. I ' Pollux : I slope. PuC-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: !Severe: :Slight------------:Moderate: Pollux : slope. i slope. : slope. : I slope. i , I : Pv--------------------:Severe: :Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: Pootatuck : flooding. : flooding, : flooding. ! wetness, ! flooding. wetness. : 1 flooding. I I Quarries I Ra--------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: Raynham : wetness. I wetness. : wetness. I wetness, : wetness. I I erodes easily. , i Rd A, RdB--------------!Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Severe: Ridgebury I wetness, I wetness, I wetness, I wetness. ! wetness. peres slowly. : Peres slowly. : peres slowly. ReA, ReB--------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: Ridgebury : large stones, : large stones, : wetness, I wetness. I wetness. wetness, : wetness, : large stones, peres slowly. : peres slowly. : small stones. Rm--------------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: Rippowam : wetness I wetness. I wetness, : wetness. I wetness, : flooding. : : flooding. : : flooding. 1 Ro*. Rock outcrop I � ' I � RoC*: Rock outcrop. Narragansett---------!Severe: :Moderate: !Severe: !Slight------------:Severe: : large stones. : slope, : slope, I large stones. large stones. : large stones. I � See footnote at end of table. ew 108 Soil survey TABLE 8 --RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and i Camp areas ; Picnic areas i Playgrounds ! Paths and trails ; Golf fairways map symbol i ! i HgD-------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: ;Moderate: :Severe: Hinckley ; slope. ; slope. ; slope. i slope. ; slope. i : ! HgE-------------------:Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: (Severe: Hinckley I slope. ! slope. I slope. ! slope. slope. Hu*: ! i Hinckley-------------(Slight----------:Slight----------!Moderate: !Slight------------:Moderate: slope, : small stones, : small stones. ; droughty. No Merrimac-------------:Slight----------:Slight----------;Moderate: :Slight------------!Slight. slope, ! ! ; ; small stones. Urban land. ! ! : HvC-------------------!Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: :Slight------------:Severe: Holyoke ; depth to rock. ; depth to rock. ; slope, ; ; thin layer. large stones, lIAII ; ; i depth to rock. Lk--------------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Severe: !Severe: Limerick ; flooding, ; wetness. I wetness, wetness. 1 flooding, : wetness. , ! flooding. wetness. Ma--------------------:Severe: !Severe: :Severe: !Severe: :Severe: Maybid 1 ponding, i ponding, i ponding, ; ponding. ! ponding. peres slowly. i peres slowly. ; peres slowly. ! MeA-------------------:Slight----------:Slight----------!Moderate: :Slight------------;Slight. Merrimac : ; ! small stones. ! MeB-------------------:Slight----------!Slight----------:Moderate: :Slight------------!Slight. Merrimac : i : slope, NO : small stones. : Me :Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Slight------------:Moderate: Merrimac ! slope. : slope. : slope. : : slope. MeD-------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: :Moderate: :Severe: Merrimac : slope. : slope. : slope. ! slope. ! slope. MoB-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: !Slight------------:Slight. Montauk ! Peres slowly. : peres slowly. ! slope, ! : small stones. MoC-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: :Severe: :Slight------------:Moderate: Montauk : slope, : slope, : slope. : i slope. peres slowly. : peres slowly. : MsC-------------------;Moderate: :Moderate: !Severe: :Slight------------:Moderate: Montauk : slope, : slope, ! large stones, ! i small stones, : large stones. : large stones. 1 slope, : i large stones, : small stones. ! : slope. MxB-------------------I:Severe: :Severe: :severe: :Slight------------;Moderate: Montauk : large stones. I large stones. : large stones, i : small stones, : small stones. i : large stones. MxC-------------------:Severe: :Severe: :Severe: :Slight------------;Moderate: Montauk ! large stones. i large stones. : large stones, : : small stones, : slope, : ! large stones, small stones. slope. See footnote at end of table. to lWampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 107 TABLE 8 --RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT--Continued RM I 1 Soil name and ! Camp areas I Picnic areas ; Playgrounds ; Paths and trails ! Golf fairways map symbol to 1 1 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------:Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Severe: :Severe: reetown ; wetness, ; wetness, wetness, ; wetness, ! wetness, excess humus. ; excess humus. ; excess humus. ! excess humus. ; excess humus. I I I I 4B------------------- Moderate: IM,oderate• :Severe: !Slight------------ Moderate: ' loucester 1 small stones. 1 small stones. ; small stones. ; small stones droughty. I I I I I I I I I I GfC-------------------!Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: !Slight------------:Moderate: loucester ! slope, 1 slope, ; slope, ; slope, ! small stones. ; small stones. ; small stones. ; small stones, droughty. I I 1 I I I I I 1 I GhB-------------------!Moderate: !Moderate: ;Severe: ;Slight------------!Moderate: loucester ; large stones. ! large stones. ! large stones, ! small stones, small stones. ; ! droughty. GnC-------------------!Moderate: !Moderate: :Severe: !Slight------------!Moderate: Gloucester ! slope, ! slope, ; slope, ! ! slope,, large stones. ! large stones. large stones, ; ! small stones, small stones. ; ! droughty. I I t I I I GxB-------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: ;Moderate: !Severe: Gloucester ! large stones. ! large stones. ! large stones, ! large stones. ! large stones. small stones. 1 I 1 I I 1 ! I I C :-------------------!Severe: !Severe: :Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: Gloucester ! large stones. ! large stones. ! slope, ! large stones. ! large stones. large stones, small stones. t I 1 1 I I I I I I -------------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: Gloucester ! slope, ! slope, ! slope, ! large stones, ! slope, large stones. ! large stones. ! large stones, ! slope. ! large stones. small stones. I I 1 H --------------------!Severe: !Slight----------!Moderate: !Slight------------!Moderate: Hadley ! flooding. ! ! flooding. ! ! flooding. I 1 I 1 I H40: ! ' idley---------------!Severe: !Slight----------!Moderate: !Slight------------!Moderate: ! flooding. ! ! flooding. ! ! flooding. ! ! ! ! ! Winooski-------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Slight------------!Moderate: flooding. ! wetness. ! flooding, ! ! flooding. wetness. ! ! ! ! ! Urban land. ! ! ! ! ! H-ven----------------!Slight----------!Slight----------:Moderat:Moderate: IMdderateeasily. !Slight. small stones. 1 I 1 I I I I I I I HfC-------------------!Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Severe: !Moderate: PNen ! slope. ! slope. ! slope. ! erodes easily. ! slope. I I 1 1 I I I I I Hb -------------------:Slight----------!Slight----------!Moderate: !Slight------------!Moderate: Hinckley ! ! ! small stones. ! ! small stones, droughty. HE; !Slight----------!Slight----------!Moderate: ;Slight------------!Moderate: P: ickley ! ! ! slope, ! ! small stones, small stones. ! ! droughty. 1 I I ! I 1 I ! HE -------------------!Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Slight------------!Moderate: F^( iekley ! slope. ! slope. ! slope. ! ! small stones, droughty, slope. 1 I I ! I 1 I 1 I See footnote at end of table. lIIIIIIIIII9mpshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 105 TABLE 8 --RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT II: F me terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of I,I' "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry indicates that the soil was not rated] Soil name and : Camp areas ! Picnic areas : Playgrounds ; Paths and trails ! Golf fairways map symbol p* ------------------!Slight----------:Slight----------:Slight----------!Slight------------'Slight. awam kgd-------------------!Slight----------;Slight----------!Moderate: :Slight------------!Slight. I' Agawam ! ; ; slope. A"--------------------:Moderate: !Moderate: :Severe: !Slight------------:Moderate: ,awam ! slope. ! slope. : slope. : : slope. AmA-------------------:Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: jl', �ostown : wetness. : wetness. ! wetness. : wetness. : wetness. A --------------------!Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: Amostown : wetness. : wetness. : slope, ! wetness. I wetness. : ! : wetness. ostown-------------!Moderate: !Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: !Moderate: III wetness: ! wetness. , wetness. wetness. : wetness. )Ondsor--------------!Slight----------:Slight----------!Slight----------!Slight------------:Moderate: : droughty. Urban land ' 3 -------------------!Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate: !Severe: :Moderate: lgrade ! wetness. : wetness. : wetness. ! erodes easily. : wetness. 3Belgrade IMwetness. :Mwetness. :Mslope, 1S r1 erodes easily. : wetness. III wetness. i 3c; BoB--------------:Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: ;I Boxford : wetness, ! wetness. : wetness : wetness. ! wetness. : peres slowly. : : peres slowly. : '1116. 3c: ------- ------------ c lSpvere• „evere• !Severe• !Moderate' 'Moderate: II, 6 (ford , wetness, , wetness. , slope, : wetness. ! wetness' ' eres slowly. wetness : slope. peres slowly. ! Il, ;k -------------------:Slight----------:Slight----------!Moderate: :Slight------------:Slight. C' 3rlton : : ! slope, small stones. : Eli IL J�3rlton slope. 'Moderate: slope. �Sslope. !Slight C :mB-------------------:Moderate: !Moderate: :Severe: :Slight------------:Moderate: Charlton : large stones. : large stones. : large stones. : ! large stones. - lC. irlton I larrge�stones. , larrge�stones. larrge�stones. g ! large stones. ----------- m — ,Moderate• !Moderate: ,Severe: :slight i ;nPO------------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: :Slight------------!Moderate: stones. : large stones. C, irlton , large ,stones. , large stones. , large � ;nC-------------------!Severe: :Severe: :Severe: !Slight------------:Moderate: I � Charlton ! large stones. ! large stones. : slope, : ! slope, large stones. ! : large stones. I1 See footnote at end of table. j I,, OM �lampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 103 TABLE 7.--WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY--Continued 1 : Management concerns : Potential productivity : Soil name and !Ordi- 1_: Equip- 1 map symbol lnationlErosion I ment 1 Wind- !Seedling! Common trees ;Site 1 Trees to plant :symbol:hazard ! limita-1 throw : mortal-! :index! : ! : tion : hazard : ity -----------------! 4w !Slight !Severe !Severe !Severe !Red maple----- 6 -----1 :Easternwhitepine, I' i PP owam : : : ,Eastern white 5 spruce. I ROC": ock outcrop. IAA! P• arragansett------1 4x !ModeratelModerate:Slight :Slight !Northern red oak----1 60 :Eastern white pine, !Eastern white pine--1 68 1 eastern hemlock. ,Sugar maple---------, 55 1 olyoke-----------1 5x !Slight :Moderate:Moderate:Severe :Northern red oak----: 47 :Eastern white pine. :Eastern white pine--: 55 1 ,White ash-----------1 60 1 ock outcrop. Narragansett------! 4x !Severe :Moderate:Slight :Slight !Northern red oak----1 60 :Eastern white pine, : : ! !Eastern white pine--! 68 : eastern hemlock. !Sugar maple---------1 55 1 (' Dlyoke-----------1 5x I Moderate:ModeratelModerate:Severe :Northern red oak----1 47 :Eastern white pine. !Eastern white pine--: 55 1 !White ash-----------1 60 1 5' -----------------! 5w :Slight !Severe :Severe !Severe :Eastern white pine--1 50 !White spruce, eastern aco Sb --------! 5w !Slight :Severe :Severe :Severe !Eastern white pine--; 55 :White spruce,-- l e, eastern !Red maple-----------, 55 , hemlock, balsam fir. -----------------1 5w :Slight !Severe :Severe !Severe !Eastern white pine--: 55 !Eastern white pine, Scitico ! : : : : !Red maple-----------1 55 1 white spruce. !White ash-----------: 67 1 MM ! : : i ! : S 4----------------i 40 !Slight 'Slight ;Slight ;Slight !Sugar Eastern whit-opine--1 55 'Ewhitensprice pine, it situate : ! : : : :Eastern white ine--: spruce. I S", ShC-----------1 4x !Slight :Moderate:Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 61 !Eastern white pine, ituate ! : : : : !Eastern white pine--! 65 : white spruce. :Sugar maple---------: 55 1 SrA, SrB-----------1 4o !Slight !Slight :Slight :Slight :Eastern white pine--! 60 !Eastern white pine, Wdbury : : ! ! : !Northern red oak----1 45 ! white spruce, Norway spruce. Su------ 5s 'Slight :Slight !Slight !Severe Eastern white- 50 pine-_! :Eastern white pine. Suncook ! ,Northern red oak----, 50 , P 50 ,Red maple -----I hemlock, balsam fir. Sw-----------------: 4w :Slight :Severe :Severe :Severe :Red maple--------- : 50 :White spruce, eastern � Swansea : ! ! : : :Eastern hemlock : 55 : he to , PM :Green ash-----------: 35 : I W_ ----------------I 4w :Slight :Severe !Severe :Severe !Eastern white pine--! 68 !Eastern white pine, Walpole ! ! ! : i !Red maple-----------: 43 1 white spruce, Norway spruce. Wc?-, WeC, WfB, WfC-! 3o :Slight :Slight :Slight :Slight :Northern red oak----1 74 :Eastern white pine. 1.._thersfield :Eastern white pine--: 75 : II :Sugar maple-------- 63 ' I: i cw See footnote at end of table. 'f l j 102 Soil survey TABLE 7.--WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY--Continued Management concerns Potential productivity Soil name and :Ordi- 1 1 Equip- I map symbol lnation:Erosion I ment 1 Wind- !Seedling; Common trees !Site 1 Trees to plant lsymbol:hazard I limita-! throw I mortal-: !index! I 1 1 tion I hazard I ity I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I NaD*: Holyoke-----------1 5x l Moderate!Moderate:Moderate:Severe ;Northern red oak----! 47 !Eastern white pine. I ! I I I (Eastern white pine--: 55 1 !White ash-----------1 60 1 I I i 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I Rock outcrop. I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I NgA, NgB-----------I 3o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine 1 75 !Eastern white pine, Ninigret I I I I I !Red maple-----------1 60 1 white spruce. I I I I !Northern red oak----1 65 1 I I I I I !Sugar maple---------1 55 1 I I I I I I I I 1 PaB, PaC-----------I 3o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 65 :Eastern white pine, Paxton I I I I I !Eastern white pine--1 66 1 Norway spruce. I I ! I I !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 I I I I I ! ! ' PaD----------------! 3r :Slight lModeratelSlight !Slight !Northern red oak----! 65 !Eastern white pine, Paxton I I ! ; I !Eastern white pine--! 66 1 Norway spruce. I ,I ,I ,I 1 , ,Sugar maple---------1 75 I PbB, PbC-----------1 30 !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 65 ;Eastern white pine, Paxton I I I I I !Eastern white pine--! 66 ! Norway spruce. !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 I I I 00 PbD----------------I 3r !Slight !Moderate:Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 65 !Eastern white pine, Paxton I I . I I I !Eastern white pine--: 66 1 Norway spruce. !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 I i I I PcB, PcC-----------1 3x !Slight :Moderateislight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 65 !Eastern white pine, po Paxton : ! I I I :Eastern white pine--! 66 1 Norway spruce. I I I I I !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 I I I --------I ! I I I PcD-------- ! 3x !Slight lModeratelSlight !Slight !Northern red oak----! 65 !Eastern white pine, Paxton I I I I I !Eastern white' pine--! 66 1 Norway spruce. I I I I I !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 1 I I ! I I I I Pd*. I Paxton------------! 30 !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----! 65 !Eastern white pine, I I ! I !Eastern white pine--! 66 1 Norway spruce. A ! I I I I I !Sugar maple---------1 75 1 I I I I. I I I 1 Charlton----------I 4o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----1 65 !Eastern white pine, I I I I I !Eastern white pine--! 65 1 white spruce, I I I I I !Red maple---------- 55 ! eastern hemlock. PP ! I I I I !Shagbark hickory----1 60 1 I I I I !Sugar maple---------1 55 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ! I Urban land. I I I I 1 ! ! ! I I PuA, PuB, PuC------! 40 !Slight !Slight :Slight !Slight ;Eastern white pine--! 70 !Eastern white pine, Pollux I I I I I ;Northern red oak----1 65 1 white spruce. !Sugar maple---------1 60 1 I I I I I I 1 I Pv-----------------! 30 :Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--! 75 !Eastern white pine, Pootatuck ! ! ! ! ! :Red maple-----------1 60 1 white spruce. !Yellow birch--------1 60 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ra-----------------1 4w !Slight !Severe !Severe !Severe !Eastern white pine--! 65 !Eastern white pine, Raynham I ! ! ! ! !Red maple-----------1 1 white spruce. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RdA, RdB-----------I 4w !Slight !Severe !Severe !Severe !Northern red oak----1 57 !Eastern white pine, Ridgebury ! 1 ! i ! !Eastern white pine--: 63 1 white spruce. I I I !Sugar maple---------1 52 1 I I I I I I I I ' Re A, ReB-----------1 4x !Slight !Severe !Severe !Severe !Northern red oak----1 57 !Eastern white pine, Ridgebury 1 ! ! ! ! !Eastern white pine--I 63 1 white spruce. I ! ! ! ! !Sugar maple---------1 52 1 I ! I See footnote at end of table. Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 101 TABLE 7.--WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY--Continued Management concerns 1 Potential productivity pw Soil name and lOrdi- : : Equip- map symbol lnationlErosion I ment : Wind- !Seedling! Common trees !Site : Trees to plant !symbol:hazard : limita-: throw : mortal-! !index: : tion ! hazard ! ity : I I I I I I I i 1 I I I 1 I I I t 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I ! I I I gA, HgB, HgC------! 5s !Slight !Slight !Slight !Severe !Northern red oak----: 49 !Eastern white pine. iinckley : : ! i : :Eastern white pine--! 60 ! ' :Sugar maple---------! 57 ! I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I PWD, HgE-----------! 5s :Slight :Moderate:Slight :Severe !Northern red oak----! 49 :Eastern white pine. :Eastern white pine--: 60 ! !Sugar maple---------: 57 ! I I 1 I I I I I I ! ! I 1 I Hui: pWinckley----------: 5s ;Slight :Slight !Slight ;Severe nwred oak----: 60 !Eastern white pine. Eastern v ! !Sugar maple---------: 57 ! I i I I I I Merrimac----------! 4s !Slight :Slight !Slight !ModeratelNorthern red oak----! 51 !Eastern white pine. !Eastern white pine--! 64 :Sugar maple---------I 58 : Urban land. I 1 1 I I I 1 1 WC----------------! 5d !Slight !Slight lModeratelSevere !Northern red oak----: 47 !Eastern white pine. iolyoke ! : : ! : !Eastern white pine--! 55 : i ! :White ash-----------1 60 : 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Lk-----------------: 4w !Slight :Severe :Severe :Severe :Eastern white pine--! 65 :Eastern white pine; �II �!imerick : : ! ! : :Red maple-----------: 60 ! white spruce. I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I -----! 5w :Slight !Severe :Severe !Severe !Red maple-----------! 55 : Maybid l"A, MeB, MeC------: 4s :Slight :Slight !Slight !Moderate:Northern red oak----! 51 !Eastern white pine. errimac ! : ! ! : :Eastern white pine--: 64 : :Sugar maple---------! 58 : 1 I I I 1 I I I ---------I 1 I I I I I I MeD------- : 4s !Slight :Moderate:Slight lModeratelNorthern red oak----: 51 :Eastern white pine. #Merrimac : : ! : : :Eastern white pine--: 64 ! !Sugar maple---------: 58 : I 1 I I I I I I MoB, MoC-----------: 30 !Slight :Slight !Slight :Slight :Sugar maple--------- 65 :Norway spruce white ,Aontauk :Northern red oak----! 70 s pruce. i :Eastern white pine--! 75 : I I I I I I I 1 ----------I 1 1 I I 1 1 I t;..0------ : 30 :Slight :Slight :Slight !Slight !Sugar maple---------! 65 !Norway spruce, white Montauk ! ! ! ! : !Northern red oak----! 70 ! spruce. P ! 3x !Slight :Moderate:Slight :Slight :Eastern white pine--! 75 (Eastern white pine. ntauk MxD---------------- 3 x !Slight :Moderatel Sli ht !Slight :Eastern white P ine--! 75 :Eastern white pine. Montauk i� Jill 1, it ,,arragansett------: 4x :Moderate:ModeratelSlight :Slight :Northern red oak----! 60 !Eastern white pine, : !Eastern white pine--: 68 ! eastern hemlock. :Sugar maple---------! 55 ! I! I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I >lyoke-----------: 5x !Slight lM,oderate:ModeratelSevere !Northern red oak----! 47 !Eastern white ine. P ; !Eastern white pine--! 55 : !White ash-----------! 60 : I I I I I I I )ck outcrop. 1 I I I I I ! ! Narragansett------! 4x :Severe :Moderate:Slight !Slight :Northern red oak----: 60 !Eastern white pine, :Eastern white pine--: 68 : eastern hemlock. : ! : !Sugar maple---------! 55 ! I I I 1 I I I See footnote at end of table. IC. t E MpHampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 99 TABLE 7.--WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY [Only the soils suitable for production of commercial trees are listed. Absence of an entry indicates that information was not available] ! ! Management concerns ; Potential productivity Soil name and !Ordi- ! ! Equip- ! ! ! ! map symbol :nation!Erosion ! ment ! Wind- ;Seedling; Common trees ;Site ; Trees to plant lsymbol:hazard ! limita-! throw ! mortal-: !index! ! ! ! tion ! hazard , ity ,I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 gA, AgB, AgC------! 4o !Slight ;Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--! 70 !Eastern white pine, Agawam ! ! ; ! ! !Northern red oak----: 65 ! white spruce, ! ! ! ! ! !Sugar maple---------! 60 ! Norway spruce. AmA, AmB-----------! 3o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--: 75 !Eastern white pine, Amostown ,Northern red oak----, ' 70 ! white spruce, ! ! ! ! ! !Sugar maple---------! 65 ! eastern hemlock. I I I I I I t 1 Au*: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Amostown----------! 3o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--! 75 !Eastern white pine, ! ! ! ! ! !Northern red oak----! 70 ! white spruce, I I I I ! (Sugar maple---------, 65 ! eastern hemlock. I I I 1 1 Windsor-----------! 4s !Slight ;Slight !Slight !Severe !Eastern white pine--! 60 !Eastern white pine. ! ! ! ! ! !Northern red oak----! 55 ! ! ! ! t ! !Sugar maple---------! 60 ; I I 1 I I Urban land. I I I I 1 1 I I ,AaA, BaB-----------! 3o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--: 75 !Eastern white pine, Belgrade ! ! ! ! ! ,Northern red oak----, 62 ! white spruce. I 1 I I I 1 I zoA, BoB-----------! 4c, !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--! 65 !Eastern white pine, Boxford !Northern red oak----! 55 ! white spruce. I oC----------------! 4r !Moderate!Moderate!Slight !Slight !Eastern white pine--! 65 !Eastern white pine, Boxford ! ! ! ! ! !Northern red oak----! 55 ! white spruce. I 1 ! I 1 1 I I CkB CkC-----------, 4o !Sli g ht !Slight ,Sli g ht ,Sli g ht ,Northern red oak----, 65 !Eastern white pine Charlton !Eastern white pine--! 65 ! white spruce, �' ! ! ! ! ! !Red maple-----------! 55 ! eastern hemlock. !Shagbark hickory----! 60 ! ! ! ! ! ! !Sugar maple---------! 55 ! I I I 1 I 1 I I - , #&n B, CmC-----------! 4o !Slight !Slight !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----: 65 !Eastern white pine, Charlton !Eastern white pine--, 65 ! white spruce, ! ! ! ! ! :Red maple-----------: 55 ! eastern hemlock. !Shagbark hickory----! 60 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 'AnB, CnC, CnD------! 4x !Slight :Moderate:Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----! 65 !Eastern white pine, Charlton ! ! ! ! ! !Eastern white pine--! 65 ! white spruce, !Red maple-----------: 55 !' eastern hemlock. :Shagbark hickory----! 60 ! a,oE*: ! ! ! : ! ! ! ! 'III, Charlton----------! 4x lModerate!Severe !Slight !Slight !Northern red oak----! 65 !Eastern white pine, d ! 1 I 1 1 1 ! I I ! ! ,Eastern white pine--,! 65 1 white spruce, !Red maple-----------! 55 ! eastern hemlock. ! ! ! ! ! !Shagbark hickory----! 60 ! hl II4 I I I I I I I I 1 i I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 Gloucester--------: 4x :ModeratelSevere !Slight lModerate:Northern red oak----! 60 !Eastern white pine. !Eastern white pine--! 61 ! I ! 1 I I I I 1 II,pC*, CpD*: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Charlton----------! 4x !Slight lModeratelSlight !Slight !Northern r.ed oak----! 65 :Eastern white pine, !Eastern white pine--: 65 ! white spruce, ! ! ! ! ! !Red maple-----------! 55 ! eastern hemlock. ! ! ! ! ! !Shagbark hickory----! 60 ! go Hollis------------: 5x :Slight !Moderate!ModeratelSevere !Northern red oak----! 47 !Eastern white pine. ! ! ! ! ! !Eastern white pine--: 55 ! :Sugar maple---------! 56 ! ! ! I I I I 1 ! I ! I 1 1 I 1 0 See footnote at end of table. I II !il �I Ikmpshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 97 TABLE 5•--YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE--Continued I I 1 I 1 1 ICI j Soil name and ; ; ; ; ; Grass- ; map symbol 1 Corn silage i Sweet corn i Tobacco ; Alfalfa hay I legume hay 1 Grass-clover II; i Ton i Ton i Lb i Ton i Ton i AUM* ReB-Y----------------i --- i --- i --- i -- i -- ' --- it .d g ebdr I I tm---=-------------------- 20 I --- I --- I --- 3.5 I 6.7 j6ppowam i nuck outcrop --------------------1 ___ I --- I --- I --- I --- 1 --- t ck outcrop- arragansett-Holyoke i I I I I III I I 1 I I 1 lack outcrop- arragansett-Holyoke id------------------------ --- --- --- --- --_ ��I I 1 1 1 I 1 Saco i ---------------------- `- arboro I 16 i - I --- i --- i 3.5 i 6.7 ll, fl Ic------------------------ -- Wtico j- ------------------------I 24 --- --- i 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.7 Scituate ' ----------------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- i � �t ShC-- Ltuate 1 1 I -_ TA----------------------- 18 i 5.9 i - i 4.0 ; 3.5 i 6.7 Ilil Sudbury ,r ----------------------- 18 i 5.9 i --- i 4.0 i 3.5 1 6.7 1bury i i i i i i ii -------------- u---------- � 12 I 3.0 I -- i 2.5 I 2.0 3.8 ill: Sopcook _ __ __ _ Swansea d -------' I I I I I I I U,- rthents I , __ ----------------------i 18 i - i --- i --- i 3.0 i 5.7 Walpole e ---------- I 22 I 5.9 I --- I 4.5 I 4.0 I 7.6 W hersfield eC I I I - 20 I 5.6 1 - 3.5 , 4.0 1 f, WfC--- ---------------i --- i --- it pl;, Wethersfield go" WgC------------------ i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- We "hersfield l --- --- --- °- --- --- j' Whitman ----- -- --- 3.0 1 2.5 4.8 I .zj � i _ i i i V6ee footnotes at end of table. IEi i is If pop 96 Soil survey TABLE 5•--YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE--Continued 40 Soil name and i i i i Grass- 1 map symbol i Corn silage ; Sweet corn ; Tobacco 1 Alfalfa hay ; legume hay 1 Grass-clover Ton ; Ton ; Lb i Ton ; Ton ; AUM* on ' -- --- MoII-----------------------I 22 I 1 I 4.0 3.5 1 6.5 Montauk I I 1 ' ' I I I I I I MOC-----------------------i 20 i --- i --- i 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.5 Montauk 1 1 I I ' I 1 1 MsC----------------------- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- Montauk ; I I MxB, MxC, MxD------------- i --- i --- i --- i --- i - i --- Montauk 1 ; I I ' 1 i I I 1 1 NaC----------------------- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- Narragansett-Holyoke- 1 , I I Rock outcrop I I NaD----------------------- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- Narragansett-Holyoke- Rock outcrop , i 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 NgA, NgB--------- 22 5.9 --- 4.0 3.5 6.7 Ninigret I I ' I PaB-----------------------i 24 i 5.9 i --- i 4.5 1 4.0 i 7.5 Paxton 1 1 i ' I 1 1 I 1 PaC-----------------------i 22 i --- i --- i 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.7 I 1 Paxton I I I I PaD-----------------------1 20 i --- i --- i 3.5 i 3.0 i 5.7 , I Paxton i 1 I I 1 PbB, PbC, PbD------------- i --- Paxton 1 , � I I PcB, PcC, PcD, PcE-------- i --- i --- 1 --- --- --- --- 1 Paxton 1 Pd------------------------1 --- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- I 1 Paxton-Charlton-Urban 1 land i I Pits go i 1 I --------- PuA-------------- i 24 i 6.3 i --- I 4.5 i 4.0 i 7.6 Pollux PuB----------------------- 24 6.3 1 --- 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 7.6 Pollux I I PuC-----------------------1 22 i 5.6 i --- i 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.7 Pollux 1 � ---------------I Pv--------- i 24 i 6.3 i --- i 4.0 i 4.5 i 8.6 Pootatuck QU**--7------------------- i --- i --- --- i --- i --- i --- Quarries I I 1 --- Ra------------------------1 18 I --- --- 3.5 6.7 I Raynham 1 --- I --- 1 --- 1 RdA, RdB------------------1 16 3.5 1 6.7 Ridgebury i 1 I See footnotes at end of table. 'I I� Ij 00ampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 95 TABLE 5.--YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE--Continued Soil name and ; ; ; ; ; Grass- map symbol ; Corn silage 1 Sweet corn ; Tobacco ; Alfalfa hay i legume hay ; Grass-clover 11 I i I 1 I Ton ; Ton ; Lb ; Ton ; Ton ; AUM* ------------------- ,umps ---' --- j --- i --- i --- i --- i --- illl EsA EsBg-- --------------- 18 ; --- 3.0 I 5.7 I I --- i ill I I I , , �nosbur --- -- --- . reetown --- --- i 4.0 3.0 5.7 I I I I I loucester I 14 --- --- 4.0 I 3.0 I 5.7 d GEC----------------------- i Gloucester "^! loucester i i i i i GxB, Gx C, Gx D-------------1 low F ------------------------I 28 6.3 1 --- 5.0 , 4.5 I 1 8.5 `n a d l e Y ---i --- i --- ; --- i --- i --- i --- ii jl idley-Winooski-Urban ; and H f B- 1 24, 6.0 4.5 4.0 7.6 Wen Ij I IG I H -----------------------i 22 i 5.0 i --- i 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.7 Haven 1 1 I i ' H B------------------' 1 I I I I , g I 14 , 4.5 I --- I 3.5 , 3.0 5.7 ui nckleY igc Hinckley -------- 12 --- '-- i 3.0 I 2.5 I 4.8 II[ -----------------------' --- --- --- I --- I 1.5 1 2.8 E , 1 , i nckley L ckley ----------------------- --- --- i --- Hinckley-Merrimac-Urban , 34 la ----------------------i E '.yoke I I I I 1 I --- --- 6 .k------------------------i 20 i 4.9 i i i 3.5 1' 6.6 ICI L e r i c k 1d- -----------------------i Maybid leow MeB------------------; 18 i 6.1 i 1,200 4.0 3.0 i 5.7 I M. rimac _- IeC-----------------------i 16 i 6.0 i - i 4.0 i 3.0 5.7 Merrimac j Ie ----------------------i 14 ' --- 3.5 , 2.5 4.8 i M rimac I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 *Wee footnotes at end of table. Ij 111` a'* 94 Soil survey TABLE S.--YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE [Yields are those that can be expected under a high level of management. Absence of a yield indicates that the soil is not suited to the crop or tiie crop generally is not grown on the soil] Soil name and i Grass- map symbol ; Corn silage ; Sweet corn 1 Tobacco 1 Alfalfa hay i legume hay 1 Grass-clover Ton ; Ton ; Lb i Ton Ton i AUhJ* AgA---------------------- 24 6.3 I 1,500 ; 5 4.5 I 8.5 4!1 Agawam i 1 AgB-----------------------1 24 ; 6.1 i 1,450 i 4.5 i 4.0 i 7.6 Agawam AgC-----------------------i 22 I 5.9 1 1,400 i 4.5 i 4.0 1 7.6 Agawam 1 AmA-----------------------i 22 i 5.9 I --- i 4.0 1 3.5 1 6.6 Amostown ; AmB-----------------------i 20 ; 5.5 i --- 4.0 i 3.5 i 6.6 Amostown 1 Amostown-Windsor-Urban land BaA-----------------------i 24 i 6.3 i --- 1 4.5 I 4.0 i 7.5 Belgrade I BaB-----------------------i 22 1 6.0 --- I 4.0 3.5 1 6.7 Belgrade 1 1 1 1 BoA-----------------------i 22 i --- i --- i --- i 3.0 i 5.7 Boxford BoB-----------------------1 20 --- I --- 1 --- 1 3.5 1 6.7 Boxford I BoC-----------------------1 18 1 --- I --- 1 --- 1 3.5 I 6.7 Boxford 1 CkD-----------------------i 24 i 5.9 i --- i 5.0 1 4.5 i 8.6 Charlton CkC-----------------------1 22 5.3 I --- 1 4.0 1 3.5 1 6.6 Charlton 1 1 1 1 1 1 CmB, CmC------------------ i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- i --- Charlton CnB, CnC, CnD------------- 1 --- --- 1 --- I --- 1 --- 1 --- Charlton Charlton and Gloucester --- Charlton-Hollis CrC----------------------- --- i --- ; --- i --- i --- Charlton-Rock outcrop- Hollis 1 1 1 °- --- --- Charlton-Rock outcrop- , Hollis De A-----------------------1 22 i 5.0 i 1,400 i 3.5 i 3.0 i 5.8 Deerfield See footnote at end of table. orHampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 93 TABLE 4.--ACREAGE AND PROPORTIONATE EXTENT OF THE SGILS--Continued Map ; symbol Soil name Acres !Percent ! sm�cD ;Paxton very stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes-------------------------! 2,973 1 2.1 cE !Paxton very stony fine sandy loam, steep-------------------------------------------! 415 1 0.3 'd ;Paxton-Charlton-Urban land complex-------------------------------------------------1 795 ; 0.6 ?g !Pits, gravel-----------------------------------------------------------------------! 1,093 ! 0.8 PuA ;Pollux fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes--------------------------------------! 402 0.3 uB !Pollux fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------------! 657 1 0.5 uC !Pollux fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent sloes------------------------------ 279 0.2 v !Pootatuck fine sandy loam----------------------------------------------------------! 1,599 Qu !Quarries---------------------------------------------------------------------------! 15 ! Ra lRaynham silt loam------------------------------------------------------------------! 2,287 1 1.6 "JdA !Ridgebury fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------ 173 1 0.1 4444-� :dB !Ridgebury fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------ 133 'r 0. 1 eA ;Ridgebury very stony fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------! 832 1 0.6 "neB ;Ridgebury very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------------- 1,965 ; 1.4 Rm ;Rippowam fine sandy loam___________________________________________________________1 1,315 ! 0.9 Pao !Rock outcrop------------------------------------------------------------------ 4444-; 412 ; 0.3 t' oC !Rock outcrop-Narragansett-Holyoke complex, sloping----------------------------4444-; 667 ! 0.5 of !Rock outcrop-Narragansett-Holyoke complex, steep------------------------------4444-, ' sa !Saco silt loam------------- 3,939 2.7 ------------------------------4444-- ! 841 1 0.6 -------------------- SbIScarboro muck----------------------------------------------------------------------! 772 ! 0.5 p �c !Scitico silt loam---------------------------------=--------------------------------! 2,235 1 1.5 >,-gB ;Scituate fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------ 243 1 0.2 r hB !Scituate very stony fine sand loam 3 to 8 -----------' Y Y Y percent slopes , 515 ! 0.4 shC !Scituate very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------! 137 ; 0. 1 SrA ;Sudbury fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------- 1,620 1.1 rB ;Sudbury fine sandy loam, p p 885 1 0.6 u !Suncook loamy fine sand------------------------------------------------------------! 464 ; 0.3 1 w ;Swansea muck--------------------------------------------------------- - -- --! 983 ! 0.7 -- ------ ;Ud lUdorthents, smooth------------------------------------------------------------4444-! 286 1 0.2 Wa ;Walpole fine sandy loam------------------------------------------------------------ -----�-----------------------------------------------------i 3,446 1 2.4 _*B !Wethersfield fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------! 615 1 0.4 2C ;Wethersfield fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------ 550 1 0.4 °B !Wethersfield stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes---------------------4444-; 499 1 0.3 l!I WfC ;Wethersfield stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes--------------------4444- 686 1 0.5 W B ;Wethersfield very stony fine sandy loam 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------- 504 ' 0.3 I- 4*C !Wethersfield very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-------------- 665 1 0.5 , iA !Whitman very stony fine sandy loam-------------------------------------------------; 525 1 0.4 iA ;Windsor loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes----------------------------------- 1,292 ; 0.9 WnB !Windsor loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------------! 2,825 1 2.0 ^' WnC !Windsor loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------------4444-! 1,050 ; 0.7 #n D !Windsor loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes----------------------------------------! 409 ! 0.3 >A !Windsor loamy sand, silty substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------ 258 1 0.2 , ,E !Windsor loamy sand, silty substratum, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------; 488 ! 0.3 WoC !Windsor loamy sand, silty substratum, 8 to 15 percent slopes-----------------------! 373 1 0.3 Wp !Windsor-Scitico-Amostown complex---------------------------------------------------! 1,123 1 0.8 OR Winooski silt loam--------------- - 2, B ,Woog Y , 3percent slopes-----------------------------4444-! 196 ! 0.1 dbridge fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------- 614 ! 0.4 ! WvB :Woodbridge stony fine loamy 8 am, 3 percent 176 ; 0.1 WvB lWoodbrid e ston fire sand loam "WC !Woodbridge stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 p ercent slopes-------------------- 1 , 0.1 I i I B !Woodbridge very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-----------------------, 1 , 182 ! 0.8 !Woodbridge Y stony fine sandy loam, 1t1P slopes 1 , O WxD :Woodbridge very stony finesandy loam, 5to25percentslopes--------------------- 4 286 W ,Water----------_ - _ - _ - 57 3. Total------------------------- ------------------------------------------1 1 0 44-20--;-100. ' 4444-- 144,200 ! 100.0 * Less than 0.1 percent. Ilt i �I �w 92 Soil survey a TABLE 4.--ACREAGE AND PROPORTIONATE EXTENT OF THE SOILS I I I I I so Map ; Soil name i Acres :Percent symbol; I : I � I I I I I I AgA ;Agawam fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes--------------------------------------1 1,350 ; 0.9 AgB ;Agawam fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------------1 1,167 ; 0.8 AgC ;Agawam fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------------- 373 1 0.3 AmA :Amostown fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------------1 1,700 ; 1.2 AmB :Amostown fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------1 1,831 1.3 Au :Amostown-Windsor silty substratum-Urban land complex-------------------------------: 2,352 : 1.6 BaA :Belgrade silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------------------: 697 : 0.5 BaB :Belgrade silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------------: 1,437 1 1 .0 BOA :Boxford silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes-------------------------------------------: 484 : 0.3 BOB :Boxford silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-------------------------------------------1 1,490 : 1.0 BOC :Boxford silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------------------: 554 : 0.4 CkB :Charlton fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------: 306 1 0.2 CkC :Charlton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-----------------------------------: 280 1 0.2 CmB :Charlton stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------- ---: 276 1 0.2 ---------------- CmC :Charlton stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-----------------------------: 234 : 0.2 CnB :Charlton very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-------------------------1 433 : 0.3 CnC :Charlton very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------: 1,039 1 0.7 CnD :Charlton very stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes-----------------------: 1,283 1 0.9 COE :Charlton and Gloucester very stony fine sandy loams, steep-------------------------: 671 1 0.5 CPC :Charlton-Hollis fine sandy loams, rocky, 3 to 15 percent slopes--------------------: 1,818 : 1 .3 CpD :Charlton-Hollis fine sandy loams, rocky, 15 to 25 percent slopes-------------------1 342 : 0.2 CrC :Charlton-Rock outcrop-Hollis complex, sloping--------------------------------------1 2,794 1 1 .9 CrE :Charlton-Rock outcrop-Hollis complex, steep----------------------------------------1 8,687 1 6.0 DeA :Deerfield loamy fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes-----------------------------------: 1,369 : 0.9 Du :Dumps------------------------------------------------------------------------------: 105 : 0.1 EsA :Enosburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------------: 1,527 : 1.1 IN EsB :Enosburg fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------: 496 0.3 Fm :Freetown muck----------------------------------------------------------------------1 1,593 1 1 .1 GfB :Gloucester fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------------------------------1 218 1 0.1 GfC :Gloucester fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---------------------------------1 139 : 0.1 GhB :Gloucester stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------------------------1 371 : 0.3 O GhC :Gloucester stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---------------------------: 246 : 0.2 GxB :Gloucester very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-----------------------: 876 : 0.6 GxC :Gloucester very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes----------------------: 954 : 0.7 GxD :Gloucester very stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes---------------------: 704 1 0.5 Ha :Hadley silt loam-------------------------------------------------------------------: 6,111 1 4.2 W Hd :Hadley-Winooski-Urban land complex-------------------------------------------------1 398 : 0.3 HfB :Haven very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------------------------------1 177 1 0.1 HfC :Haven very fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes---------------------------------1 417 1 0.3 HgA :Hinckley loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes-----------------------------------------1 3,352 1 2.3 HgB :Hinckley loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes-----------------------------------------: 4,176 : 2.9 pa HgC :Hinckley loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------------- 2,171 : 1.5 HgD :Hinckley loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes---------------------------------------: 1,684 : 1 .2 Hg :Hinckley loamy sand, 25 to 35 percent slopes---------------------------------------: 1,056 1 0.7 Hu :Hinckley-Merrimac-Urban land complex-----------------------------------------------: 2,804 : 1.9 HvC :Holyoke stony very fine sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes-------------------------: 916 1 0.6 #w Lk :Limerick silt loam-----------------------------------------------------------------1 2,330 : 1 .6 Ma :,Maybid silt loam-------------------------------------------------------------------: 694 1 0.5 MeA :Merrimac fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------------1 3,101 1 2.1 Me :Merrimac fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes------------------------------------1 3,494 1 2.4 MeC :Merrimac fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-----------------------------------1 1,478 1 1.0 00 MeD :Merrimac fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes----------------------------------: 510 1 0.4 MOB :Montauk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-------------------------------------: 147 1 0.1 MOC :Montauk fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------------: 121 : 0.1 MsC :Montauk stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes------------------------------: 261 : 0.2 MxB :Montauk very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------: 584 : 0.4 on MxC :Montauk very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes------------------------ : 958 : 0.7 MxD :Montauk very stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes------------------------: 290 ; 0.2 NaC :Narragansett-Holyoke-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slope-------------------1 396 : 0.3 NaD :Narragansett-Holyoke-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes-----------------1 794 1 0.5 NgA :Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes------------------------------------1 1,250 : 0.9 ;W NgB :Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes----------------------------------- : 486 : 0.3 PaB :Paxton fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes-------------------------------------- 1,120 : 0.8 PaC :Paxton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-------------------------------------1 728 : 0.5 PaD :Paxton fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes------------------------------------1 218 1 0.1 PbB :Paxton stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------1 541 1 0.4 am PbC :Paxton stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes-------------------------------1 494 1 0.3 PbD :Paxton stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes----------------------------- 1 229 : 0.2 PoB :Paxton very stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes---------------------------: 1,307 1 0.9 FCC :Paxton very stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes--------------------------1 3,390 1 2.3 36 Soil survey PX to 50 acres. Stones 5 to 20 feet apart are-on the positions, and the Walpole soils are in lower positions. surface. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the acreage Typically, the surface layer of these soils is very of these units. friable, dark brown fine sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The permeability of these Sudbury soils is moderately The subsoil is friable and is 17 inches thick. It is rapid in the subsoil and rapid in the substratum. yellowish brown fine sandy loam in the upper 9 inches, Available water capacity is moderate. The root zone dark yellowish brown sandy loam in the next 4 inches, extends to the loose substratum. The soils have a and dark yellowish brown, mottled sandy loam in the seasonal high water table which is in the lower part of lower 4 inches. The substratum is firm, mottled loamy the subsoil in winter and spring. Reaction of the soils in sand to a depth of 60 inches or more. It is grayish brown unlimed areas ranges from extremely acid to medium in the upper 5 inches and gray in the lower part. acid. Included with these soils in mapping are a few small Many areas of these soils are farmed. A few areas are areas of Woodbridge, Montauk, and Ridgebury soils that in woodland, and the soils are suited to trees. Some make up about 15 percent of the acreage of the units. areas have been developed for homesites. The permeability of these Scituate soils is moderately These soils are well suited to cultivated crops and to rapid in the subsoil and slow in the substratum. Available hay and pasture. Good tilth is easily maintained in water capacity is moderate. The root zone extends to cultivated areas. Wetness is the major management the firm substratum. These soils have a seasonal concern, and subsurface drains are needed in places. perched water table above the substratum in winter and Minimum tillage and the use of cover crops and grasses spring and for short periods after prolonged rains. and legumes in the cropping system help to reduce Reaction of the soils ranges from extremely acid to runoff and improve tilth. The use of contour tillage in unit medium acid. SrB helps to control the moderate hazard of erosion. Most areas of these soils are in woodland. Some have Mixing crop residue and manure into the surface layer been developed for homesites. also improves tilth and increases the organic matter The stones on the surface make these soils poorly content. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and suited to cultivated crops or to hay and pasture. In areas pasture rotation help to maintain desirable pasture plant used for pasture, proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, species. and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable pasture The seasonal high water table is the main limitation of plant species. these soils as a building site and as a site for septic tank These soils are suited to trees, but the stones on the absorption fields. The rapid permeability causes a hazard surface limit the use of harvesting equipment. of contamination'to ground water and nearby wells in The seasonal perched water table limits these soils as areas used for septic tanks. a building site. Slope is an additional limitation for Unit SrA is in capability subclass llw, and unit SrB is in building sites in unit ShC. The seasonal perched water capability subclass Ile. table and slow permeability limit the soils as a site for septic tank absorption fields. Su—Suncook loamy fine sand. This soil is deep, The capability subclass is Vlls. nearly level, and excessively drained. It is on flood plains adjacent to rivers. Most areas of this soil are on low SrA—Sudbury fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent natural levees. The areas are long and narrow and range slopes. from 5 to 20 acres. SrB—Sudbury fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent Typically, the surface layer is loose, dark gray loamy slopes. fine sand about 10 inches thick. The underlying layers These soils are deep and moderately well drained. extend to a depth of 60 inches or more. They consist of Map unit SrA consists of a nearly level soil in broad stratified loose and friable, dark grayish brown loamy fine areas. Map unit SrB consists of a gently sloping soil on sand. hills. The areas are irregular in shape and range from 5 Included with this soil in mapping are a few small to 30 acres. areas of Hadley, Winooski, and Pootatuck soils that Typically, the surface layer of these soils is very make up about 15 percent of the unit. friable, dark brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches The permeability of this Suncook soil is rapid or very thick. The subsoil is brown and is 18 inches thick. It is rapid throughout. Available water capacity is low. The friable fine sandy loam in the upper 6 inches and loose, root zone extends into the underlying layers. Flooding for mottled gravelly loamy sand in the lower 12 inches. The brief periods is common. Reaction of the soil in unlimed substratum is loose, light brownish gray, mottled very areas is strongly acid or medium acid. gravelly loamy sand and gravelly sand to a depth of 60 Most areas of this soil are in woodland. Some areas inches or more. are farmed. Included with these soils in mapping are a few small This soil is suited to cultivated crops and to hay and areas of Hinckley, Merrimac, and Walpole soils. The pasture. The low available water capacity makes Hinckley and Merrimac soils typically are in higher irrigation a major management concern. Mixing crop g Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 31 wthe subsoil in late fall, in winter, and in spring. Flooding The permeability of this Raynham soil is moderate or for brief periods is common. Reaction of the soil in moderately slow in the subsoil and slow in the unlimed areas ranges from very strongly acid to slightly substratum. Available water capacity is high. The root acid. zone extends into the substratum. This soil has a go Most areas of this soil are farmed. Many areas are in seasonal high water table which is at a depth of less woodland, and the soil is well suited to trees. than 2 feet in late fall, in winter, and in spring and for This soil is well suited to cultivated crops and to hay short periods after prolonged rains. Reaction of the soil and pasture. The main management concern is wetness in unlimed areas ranges from strongly acid to neutral in "caused by the seasonal high water table. The main the subsoil and medium acid to neutral in the management needs include installing field drains where substratum. needed, proper timing of farming operations, and Most areas of this soil are in woodland. Some areas planting after the spring floods. Mixing crop residue and are farmed. manure into the surface layer improves tilth and This soil is suited to cultivated crops and to hay and increases the organic matter content. Proper stocking pasture. Wetness is the main limitation for these uses, rates, deferred grazing, pasture rotation, and restricted and the soil needs drainage. Minimum tillage and the use grazing when the soil is saturated help to maintain of cover crops and grasses and legumes in the cropping ? desirable pasture plant species. system help to improve tilth and increase the organic Flooding and the seasonal high water table limit this matter content. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, soil as a building site and as a site for septic tank and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable pasture absorption fields. plant species. The capability subclass is Ilw. The seasonal high water table makes this soil poorly suited to trees. The water table causes a high rate of Qu—Quarries. This unit consists of areas that have seedling mortality and restricts rooting, making trees been excavated for granite. The areas typically are on susceptible to uprooting during windy periods. It also :he sides and tops of ridges that range from nearly level limits the use of harvesting equipment to periods when " co vertical. The areas consist of layers of exposed the soil is frozen or when the water table has receded. bedrock. The walls are mainly vertical, and the bottom is Planting water-tolerant species helps to lower the rate of enerally excavated in steps. Small pools of water are at seedling mortality, and establishing dense stands helps he bottom of many quarries, and some areas have small to control uprooting. piles of broken granite at the bottom and along the The seasonal high water table is the main limitation of ,pdges. this soil as a building site and, along with the moderate These areas are generally idle after mining is or moderately slow permeability, limits the soil as a site .:ompleted. The lack of soil material and difficulty of for septic tank absorption fields. excavation prevent reclamation, and very few areas have The capability subclass is Illw. w een reclaimed. Very little vegetation grows in or around he quarries. The areas have poor potential for most RdA—Ridgebury fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent .jses because of exposed bedrock, a high percentage of slopes. small stone fragments, and very low available water RdB—Ridgebury fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent eapacity. Onsite investigation is necessary to determine slopes. he suitability for any proposed use. These soils are deep and poorly drained and This unit is not assigned to a capability subclass. somewhat poorly drained. The soil in map unit RdA is nearly level or is in depressions. The soil in unit RdB is Ra—Raynham silt loam. This soil is deep, nearly gently sloping and is along drainageways or at the base Bvel, and poorly drained. It is in broad flat areas that of steeper slopes. The areas are long and narrow or range from 5 to 20 acres. irregular in shape and range from 5 to 15 acres. Typically, the surface layer is very dark brown silt loam Typically, the surface is very friable, very dark gray fine "'.bout 10 inches thick. The subsoil is 20 inches thick. It is sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is mottled ark brown, mottled silt loam in the upper 6 inches and and is 13 inches thick. It is very friable, grayish brown grayish brown, mottled very fine sandy loam in the lower fine sandy loam in the upper 5 inches and friable, gray ,A4 inches. The substratum is mottled and extends to a sandy loam in the lower 8 inches. The substratum is firm, epth of 60 inches or more. It is grayish brown silt loam olive, mottled fine sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches or i the upper 4 inches, grayish brown very fine sandy more. loam in the next 3 inches, and gray stratified loamy fine Included with these soils in mapping are a few small *and, silt, and fine sandy loam in the lower 23 inches. areas of Whitman, Woodbridge, and Scituate soils. The Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas of Whitman soils are at lower positions, and the soils with slopes of 3 to 8 percent. Also included are a Woodbridge and Scituate soils typically are at higher few small areas of Belgrade, Scitico, and Maybid soils. positions. Included areas make up about 15 percent of cluded areas make up about 15 percent of the unit. the acreage of these units. MW I OW 24 Soil survey The high water table is the main limitation of this soil The capability subclass is IIs. as a building site and, along with the slow or very slow permeability, is a limitation for septic tank absorption MeC—Merrimac fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes. fields.The capability subclass is Vlw. MeD—Merrimac fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes. MeA—Merrimac fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent These soils are deep and somewhat excessively slopes. drained. Map unit MeC is moderately sloping. This soil is MeB—Merrimac fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent on hills and the side slopes of small drainageways. Map slopes. unit MeD is moderately steep. This soil is on the side These soils are deep and somewhat excessively slopes of hills and narrow ridges adjacent to flood plains. drained. The soil making up map unit MeA is in broad, The areas of these units are irregular in shape and range nearly level areas. The soil making up unit MeB is on from 5 to 75 acres. gently sloping hills and in long, narrow areas. The areas Typically, the surface layer of these soils is dark brown of unit MeA range from 5 to 100 acres and MeB from 10 fine sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is to 150 acres. yellowish brown and is 14 inches thick. It is fine sandy Typically, the surface layer of these soils is dark brown loam in the upper part and sandy loam in the lower part. fine sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is The substratum extends to a depth of 60 inches or yellowish brown and is 16 inches thick. It is fine sandy more. It is loose, stratified grayish brown and light loam in the upper part and sandy loam in the lower part. brownish gray sand and gravelly sand. The substratum extends to a depth of 60 inches or Included with these soils in mapping are a few small more. It is loose, stratified grayish brown and light areas of Hinckley soils. Also included in unit MeC are a brownish gray sand and gravelly sand. few areas of Agawam and Sudbury soils. Included areas Included with these soils in mapping are a few small make up about 15 percent of the acreage of these units. areas of Agawam, Hinckley, and Sudbury soils. Included The permeability of these Merrimac soils is moderately areas make up about 15 percent of the acreage of these rapid in the subsoil and rapid or very rapid in the units. substratum. Available water capacity is moderate. The The permeability of these Merrimac soils is moderately root zone extends into the substratum, but root growth is rapid in the subsoil and rapid or very rapid in the restricted by loose sand and gravel in the substratum. substratum.Available water capacity is moderate. The Reaction in unlimed areas ranges from extremely acid to root zone extends into the substratum, but root growth is medium acid. restricted by loose sand and gravel in the substratum. Many areas of these soils are farmed. Many areas are Reaction in unlimed areas ranges from extremely acid to in woodland, and a few have been developed for medium acid. homesites. Many areas of this soil are farmed. Some areas are in These soils are suited to cultivated crops and to hay woodland, and many have been developed for and pasture. A severe erosion hazard and droughtiness homesites. are the main limitations. Minimum tillage, contour These soils are well suited to cultivated crops and to cultivation, terracing, and using cover crops and grasses hay and pasture. Droughtiness is the main limitation. and legumes in the cropping system help to reduce Good tilth is easily maintained in cultivated areas. runoff and control erosion. Striperopping is an additional Minimum tilage and the use of cover crops and grasses practice that helps to reduce runoff and control erosion and legumes in the cropping system help to reduce in unit MeC. Mixing crop residue and manure into the runoff and improve tilth. The use of contour tillage in unit surface layer of these soils improves tilth and increases MeB helps to control the moderate hazard of erosion. the organic matter content. Proper stocking rates, Mixing crop residue and manure into the surface layer deferred grazing, and pasture rotation help to maintain improves tilth and increases the organic matter content. desirable pasture plant species. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture The soils are suited to the growth and harvesting of rotation help to maintain desirable pasture plant species. trees, but slope limits the use of harvesting equipment in These soils are suited to the growth and harvesting of unit MeD. Droughtiness in these soils causes a high rate trees, but droughtiness causes a high rate of seedling of seedling mortality. Reducing plant competition and * mortality. Reducing plant competition and planting planting drought-resistant species will help to reduce drought-resistant species will help to reduce seedling seedling mortality. mortality. Slope limits these soils as a building site and as a site These soils have essentially no limitations for for septic tank absorption fields. The rapid or very rapid homesites. Slope is a limitation for small commercial permeability also limits these soils as a site for septic buildings in unit MeB. The rapid or very rapid tank absorption fields and causes a hazard of permeability limits these soils as a site for septic tank contamination to ground water and nearby wells. absorption fields and causes a hazard of contamination Unit MeC is in capability subclass Ille; unit MeD is in to ground water and nearby wells. capability subclass We. P 01 iampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 23 sandy loam 15 inches thick. It is dark brown in the upper proper timing of farming operations, using water-tolerant 3 inches and reddish brown in the lower 12 inches. plant species, and planting after spring flooding. Mixing Basalt bedrock is at a depth of 17 inches. crop residue and manure into the surface layer improves O„ Included with this soil in mapping are a few small tilth and increases the organic matter content. Proper !? areas of Haven, Narragansett, and Paxton soils and soils stocking rates, deferred grazing, pasture rotation, and chat have bedrock 20 to 40 inches below the surface. restricted grazing when the soil is saturated help to Also included are areas of Ridgebury soils in maintain desirable pasture plant species. iepressions. Included areas make up about 35 percent This soil is poorly suited to the growth and harvesting )f the unit. of trees. The high water table causes a high rate of The permeability of this Holyoke soil is moderate, and seedling mortality, which can be reduced by planting available water capacity is low. The root zone extends to water-tolerant species, and limits the use of harvesting '"'bedrock. Reaction in unlimed areas is very strongly acid equipment to periods when the soil is frozen or the water ? )r strongly acid. table has receded. The shallow rooting depth makes Most areas of this soil are in woodland. A few areas trees on this soil subject to uprooting during windy re farmed, and some have been developed for periods. Uprooting can be reduced by planting trees in a omesites. dense stand to reduce the effect of the wind. The stones on the surface make this soil poorly suited The seasonal high water table and flooding hazard are to cultivated crops, but the soil is suited to hay and the main limitations of the soil as a building site and as a ,„p,asture. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and site for septic tank absorption fields. ►asture rotation help to maintain desirable pasture plant The capability subclass is Illw. species. Removal of the surface stones improves the Ma—Maybid silt loam. This soil is deep, nearly level, suitability of the soil for cultivation. and very poorly drained. It is in depressions and low- pm This soil is poorly suited to the growth and harvesting lying areas. The areas are oval to irregular in shape and of trees. Droughtiness causes a high rate of seedling range from 5 to 25 acres. nortality. The shallow depth to bedrock makes trees on Typically, the surface layer is very friable silt loam this soil susceptible to uprooting during windy periods. about 10 inches thick. It is very dark brown in the upper P" The depth to bedrock limits this soil as a building site part and very dark gray and mottled in the lower part. nd as a site for septic tank absorption fields. Slope is The subsurface layer is firm, dark greenish gray silt loam an additional limitation of the soil as a site for small 3 inches thick. The subsoil is firm, dark gray silty clay commercial buildings. loam 11 inches thick. The substratum extends to a depth The capability subclass is Vis. of 60 inches or more. It is firm, dark gray, thinly stratified Lk—Limerick silt loam. This soil is deep, nearly level, silty clay, clay, and silt. n Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas of d poorly drained. It is on flood plains adjacent to � treams and rivers. The areas are crescent-shaped or soils with a surface layer and subsoil of very fine sandy loam. Also included are a few small areas of Scitico and re irregular in shape, and range from 5 to 30 acres. Saco soils. Included areas make up about 15 percent of Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown silt am about 12 inches thick. The substratum is mottled the unit. end extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. It is dark The permeability of this Maybid soil is slow or very p slow throughout. Available water capacity is high. The E Jrayish brown very fine sandy loam in the upper 8 root zone is restricted by a high water table that is at or inches. The lower part is dark gray silt loam with thin near the surface most of the year. Reaction ranges from Viands of fine sand and very fine sand. medium acid to neutral in the subsoil and slightly acid or Included with this soil in mapping are a few small neutral in the substratum. 'areas of Winooski and Saco soils that make up about 15 This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops and to hay I percent of the unit. and pasture. The high water table, which keeps the soil ! The permeability of this Limerick soil is moderate, and wet throughout the year, is the major limitation for ✓ailable water capacity is high. The root zone extends farming. Installing drainage is difficult because of the into the substratum, but root growth is restricted by a clayey texture of the soil and the lack of adequate seasonal high water table which is within 18 inches of outlets. Grazing during wet periods causes surface 1"1e surface in winter and spring. Flooding is common on compaction. e soil for brief periods. Reaction ranges from medium The soil is poorly suited to the growth and harvesting acid to neutral. of trees. The high water table causes a high rate of Most areas of this soil are in woodland. A few areas seedling mortality, which can be reduced by planting We farmed. water-tolerant species, and limits the use of equipment This soil is suited to cultivated crops and to hay and to periods when the soil is frozen or dry. The shallow pasture. The seasonal high water table keeps the soil rooting system makes trees on this soil subject to gpturated through late spring. The main management uprooting during windy periods. Uprooting can be reds include installing field drains where feasible, reduced by establishing a dense stand. s r is t ur4lampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 21 P" Included with these soils in mapping are a few small cultivated areas. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, treas of Windsor and Sudbury soils. Also included are and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable pasture areas that have less gravel in the subsoil and substratum plant species. an these Hinckley soils. Included areas make up about These soils are suited to the growth and harvesting of 10 percent of the acreage of these units. trees. Droughtiness causes a high rate of seedling The permeability of these Hinckley soils is rapid in the mortality. Reducing plant competition and planting subsoil and very rapid in the substratum. Available water drought-resistant species will help to reduce seedling "capacity is low. The root zone extends into the mortality. ubstratum, but root growth is restricted by loose, These soils have essentially no limitations as a site for tratified sand and gravel in the substratum. Reaction in dwellings. Slope is a limitation of the soils as a site for unlimed areas ranges from extremely acid to medium small commercial buildings unit H B. The rapid and e.cid. 9 9 P Most areas of these soils are in woodland. Some very rapid permeability limits these soils as a site for areas are farmed, and some have been developed for septic tank absorption fields and causes a hazard of homesites. contamination to ground water and nearby wells. These soils are suited to cultivated crops (fig. 8) and The capability subclass is Ills. hay and pasture. Droughtiness is a.limitation, and irrigation is needed in most years. Erosion is a moderate HgC—Hinckley loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes. ,4azard in unit HgB. Minimum tillage, using cover crops HgD—Hinckley loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent nd grasses and legumes in the cropping system, and slopes. fixing crop residue into the surface layer help to HgE—Hinckley loamy sand, 25 to 35 percent improve tilth and increase organic matter content in slopes. RT a. nY I Figure 8.—Shade-grown tobacco on Hinckley loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. I 20 Soil survey The lack of open space makes this unit poorly suited long and narrow or irregular in shape and range from 20 or unsuited to farming and woodland, but the soils are to 100 acres. well suited to gardens. Typically, the surface layer is brown very fine sandy Flooding is the main limitation of these soils as a loam about 3 inches thick. The subsoil is very fine sandy building site or as a site for septic tank absorption fields. loam 17 inches thick. It is yellowish brown in the upper The high water table limits the Winooski soils for 10 inches and brown in the lower 7 inches. The homesites and septic tank absorption fields. substratum is loose sand or sand and gravel to a depth This unit is not assigned to a capability subclass. of 60 inches or more. It is yellowish brown in the upper 8 inches and light brownish gray in the lower part. Included with this soil in mapping are a few small HfB—Haven very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent areas of Holyoke, Hinckley, Merrimac, Sudbury, and .� slopes.This soil is deep, gently sloping, and well Ninigret soils. The Sudbury and Ninigret soils typically drained. It is at the base of steeper hills. The areas are in lower positions, and the Holyoke and Hinckley are irregular in shape and range from 10 to 75 acres. soils are in higher positions. Also included are a few Typically, the surface layer is brown very fine sandy areas of Haven soils with slopes of 20 to 25 percent. loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is very fine sandy Included areas make up about 15 percent of the unit. loam 17 inches thick. It is yellowish brown in the upper The permeability of this Haven soil is moderate in the 10 inches and brown in the lower 7 inches. The subsoil and very rapid in the substratum. Available water substratum is loose sand or sand and gravel to a depth capacity is moderate. The root zone extends into the of 60 inches or more. It is yellowish brown in the upper 8 substratum, but root growth is restricted by the loose inches and light brownish gray in the lower part. sand and gravel in the substratum. Reaction in unlimed Included with this soil in mapping are a few small areas is very strongly acid or strongly acid. areas of Holyoke, Hinckley, Merrimac, Sudbury, and Most areas of this soil are in woodland, and the soil is Ninigret soils. The Sudbury and Ninigret soils typically well suited to trees. Some small areas are farmed, and are in lower positions, and the Holyoke and Hinckley some have been developed for homesites. soils in higher positions. Included areas make up about This soil is suited to cultivated crops and to hay and 15 percent of the unit. pasture. Good tilth is easily maintained in cultivated The permeability of this Haven soil is moderate in the areas, but the erosion hazard is moderate. Minimum subsoil and very rapid in the substratum. Available water tillage, contour tillage, striperopping, terracing, and using capacity is high. The root zone extends into the cover crops and grasses and legumes in the cropping substratum, but root growth is restricted by loose sand system help to reduce runoff and control erosion in and gravel in the substratum. Reaction in unlimed areas cultivated areas. Mixing crop residue and manure into is very strongly acid or strongly acid. the surface layer improves tilth and increases the Most areas of this soil are in woodland, and the soil is organic matter content. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable on well suited to trees. Some small areas are farmed, and some have been developed for homesites. pasture plant species. This soil is well suited to cultivated crops and to hay Slope is the main limitation of this soil as a building and pasture. Good tilth is easily maintained in cultivated site. The very rapid permeability in the substratum limits w areas, but the erosion hazard is moderate. Minimum this soil as a site for septic tank absorption fields and tillage, contour tillage, and the use of cover crops and causes a hazard of contamination to ground water and grasses and legumes in the cropping system help to nearby wells. reduce runoff and control erosion in cultivated areas. The capability subclass is Ille. Mixing crop residue and manure into the surface layer improves tilth and increases the organic matter content. HgA—Hinckley loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture HgB—Hinckley loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes. rotation help to maintain desirable pasture plant species. These soils are deep and excessively drained. The This soil has essentially no limitations for homesites, areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 to 100 but slope is a limitation for small commercial buildings. acres. Map unit HgA consists of a nearly level soil in The very rapid permeability in the substratum limits the broad areas; map unit HgB consists of a gently sloping 0. soil as a site for septic tank absorption fields and causes soil on hills and ridges and on side slopes of small a hazard of contamination to ground water and nearby drainageways. wells. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown The capability subclass is Ile. loamy sand about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is 21 inches thick. It is loose, brown loamy sand in the upper 5 inches and loose, brown gravelly sand in the lower 16 HfC—Haven very fine sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent inches. The substratum extends to a depth of 60 inches slopes. This soil is deep, moderately sloping, and well or more. It is loose, brownish yellow, stratified sand, drained. It is at the base of steeper hills. The areas are coarse sand, gravelly sand, and gravel. so 12 Soil survey into the subsoil. These soils have a seasonal high water woodland, and some have been developed for table in the lower part of the subsoil in winter and early homesites. spring and for short periods after prolonged rains. This soil is suited to cultivated crops and is well suited Reaction in unlimed areas ranges from strongly acid to to hay and pasture. Controlling erosion and wetness are WN slightly acid throughout the soil. the main management concerns. Installing drainage Many areas of these soils are farmed. Some areas are systems helps to control wetness. Farming on the in woodland, and the soils are suitable for trees. Some contour, minimum tillage, striperopping, terracing, and areas have been developed for homesites. using cover crops and grasses and legumes in the These soils are well suited to cultivated crops and to cropping system help to reduce runoff and control hay and pasture. Installing surface drains helps to erosion. Mixing crop residue and manure into the surface control wetness, which is the main limitation. Minimum layer improves tilth and increases the organic matter tillage, contour tillage, and the use of cover crops content of the soil. Proper stocking rates, deferred reduces runoff and helps to control the moderate grazing, and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable erosion hazard in unit BoB. Using grasses and legumes pasture plant species. Restricted grazing when the soil is in the cropping system and mixing crop residue and wet prevents damage to the sod. manure into the surface layer improve tilth and increase The soil is suited to trees, but slope limits the use of the organic matter content of these soils. Proper harvesting equipment. Constructing logging roads on the stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation contour helps to control erosion. help to maintain desirable pasture plant species. The seasonal high water table and slope are the main Restricted grazing when the soils are wet prevents limitations of this soil as a building site. The slow damage to the sod. permeability and seasonal high water table are The seasonal high water table and a shrink-swell limitations for septic tank absorption fields. potential are the main limitations of these soils as a The capability subclass is [Ile. building site. Slope is a further limitation for small commercial buildings in unit BoB. The slow permeability of these soils and seasonal high water table limit the CkB—Charlton fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent soils as a site for septic tank absorption fields. slopes. This soil is deep, gently sloping, and well P Unit BoA is in capability subclass llw, and unit BoB is drained. It is on ridges and on the lower slopes of hills. in capability subclass Ile. The areas of this soil are irregular in shape or rectangular and range from 5 to 25 acres. Typically, the surface layer is very friable, dark brown BoC—Boxford silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes. fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is This soil is deep, moderately sloping, and moderately friable and is 15 inches thick. It is yellowish brown fine well drained. It is in long, narrow areas that range from 5 sandy loam in the upper 6 inches and light olive brown to 15 acres. gravelly fine sandy loam in the lower 9 inches. The Typically, the surface layer is friable, very dark grayish substratum is firm, olive gravelly sandy loam to a depth brown silt loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is 20 of 60 inches or more. inches thick. It is friable, brown silt loam in the upper 2 Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of inches; friable, olive brown silty clay loam in the next 6 Paxton and Woodbridge soils that have a dense inches; and firm, olive brown, mottled silty clay loam in substratum. The Woodbridge soils typically are in lower the lower 12 inches. The substratum consists of firm, positions. Included areas make up about 15 percent of olive, mottled layers of silt and clay to a depth of 60 the unit. inches or more. The permeability of this Charlton soil is moderate or Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas with moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. a surface layer of very fine sandy loam and a few small The root zone extends into the substratum. Reaction in areas with small amounts of gravel throughout. Also unlimed areas ranges from very strongly acid to medium included are a few small areas that are not mottled and acid throughout the soil. that are at a higher position on the landscape than this Many areas of this soil are farmed. Some areas are in Boxford soil. Included areas make up about 15 percent woodland, and the soil is well suited to trees. Some of the unit. areas have been developed for homesites. The permeability of this Boxford soil is slow, and This soil is well suited to cultivated crops and to hay available water capacity is high. The root zone extends and pasture. Good tilth is easily maintained in cultivated into the subsoil. This soil has a seasonal high water areas. Where this soil is farmed, minimum tillage and use table at the lower part of the subsoil in winter and early of cover crops and grasses and legumes in the cropping spring and for short periods after prolonged rains. system help to reduce runoff and the moderate hazard Reaction in unlimed areas ranges from strongly acid to of erosion and help to increase the organic matter slightly acid throughout the soil. content. Proper stocking rates and deferred grazing help �„� Many areas of this soil are farmed. Some areas are in to maintain desirable pasture plant species. PW ,,Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 11 Pkilth and increases the organic matter content. Proper of nearly level and broad areas or long, narrow areas. stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation Unit BoB consists of gently sloping small hills. help to maintain desirable pasture plant species. Typically, the surface layer of these soils is friable, Restricted grazing when the soils are saturated helps to very dark grayish brown silt loam about 8 inches thick. " revent damage to the sod. The subsoil is 25 inches thick. It is friable, brown silt The seasonal high water table is the main limitation of loam in the upper 6 inches; friable, olive brown silty clay these soils as a building site. Slope is also a limitation of loam in the next 7 inches; and firm, olive, mottled silty *,jinit BaB as a site for small commercial buildings. The clay loam in the lower 12 inches. The substratum Slow permeability of these soils and the seasonal high consists of firm, olive, mottled layers of silt and clay to a mater table are limitations for septic tank absorption depth of 60 inches or more. fields. Included with these soils in mapping are a few areas w Unit BaA is in capability subclass llw, and unit BaB is with a surface layer of very fine sandy loam and a few n capability subclass Ile. small areas with small amounts of gravel throughout. Also included are a few small areas of Scitico soils. BoA—Boxford silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the acreage ! + BoB—Boxford silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes. of these units. These soils are deep and moderately well drained. The permeability of these Boxford soils is slow, and fhe areas range from 5 to 30 acres. Unit BoA consists available water capacity is high. The root zone extends Tlii �� :xe '� '��A � �x�,� `' •�*�,- ,r r 3 r- r ,'^te ,-•. '£ F- ^c fir.#'° 'w •"'•,. ... '' ..- m '� 'nom'nxfs'''Fr,�, ;,'* •.°`' _° xt, ., •,fit >.� +rF xr�., ��k`. w: .'"'`L -� w� } ��. St •n`Y-�f -`.L�` �'s- [ ",. G 9 'k • x r , n r dx rt_ = : Figure 5.—Harvesting cabbage on Belgrade silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. I so *ampshire County, Massachusetts, Central Part 9 P" The capability subclass is Ille. Au—Amostown-Windsor silty substratum-Urban land complex. This unit consists of deep, nearly level AmA—Amostown fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent and gently sloping soils and broad, level areas covered slopes. by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, roads, and railroads AmB—Amostown fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent (fig. 4). The areas of this unit are irregularly shaped or slopes. rectangular and range from 10 to 50 acres. They are These soils are deep and moderately well drained. about 35 percent moderately well drained Amostown Whe areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 to 50 soils, 25 percent excessively drained Windsor soils that acres. Map unit AmA consists of broad, nearly level have a silty substratum, 25 percent urbanized areas, and areas, and unit AmB consists of gently sloping hills. 15 percent other soils. The Amostown and Windsor soils Typically, the surface layer of these soils is very dark and the urbanized areas are so intricately mixed that it w9rayish brown fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The was not practical to map them separately. ubsoil is light olive brown fine sandy loam 25 inches Typically, the surface layer of the Amostown soils is snick. It is mottled in the lower 8 inches. The substratum very dark grayish brown fine sandy loam about 7 inches is mottled and extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. thick. The subsoil is light olive brown fine sandy loam 25 """! inches thick. It is mottled in the lower 8 inches. The . is stratified gray and dark yellowish brown very fine and and silt. substratum is mottled and extends to a depth of 60 Included with these soils in mapping are a few small inches or more. It is stratified gray and yellowish brown ,greas with more gravel in the subsoil than these very fine sand and silt. ,mostown soils and many areas which have loamy sand Typically, the surface layer in the Windsor soils is very ;,.A the lower part of the subsoil. Some units have small friable, very dark grayish brown loamy sand about 8 areas of Pollux and Agawam soils. Also included in unit inches thick. The subsoil is loose loamy sand 13 inches V AmB are a few small areas where the slope is 8 to 15 thick. It is strong brown in the upper 4 inches and ercent. Included areas make up about 25 percent of the yellowish brown in the lower 9 inches. The substratum acreage of units AmA and AmB. extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. It is loose, The permeability of these Amostown soils is yellowish brown sand between depths of 21 and 40 11114ioderately rapid in the subsoil and moderate to slow in inches and friable, grayish brown silt loam at a depth of ie substratum. Available water capacity is moderate. more than 40 inches. The root zone extends into the substratum. These soils Included with this complex in mapping are small areas art have a seasonal high water table which is in the lower of poorly drained and very poorly drained soils and areas of the subsoil in winter and early spring. Reaction in of moderately sloping soils. -ilimed areas is very strongly acid or strongly acid in the The permeability of the Amostown soils is moderately subsoil and ranges from strongly acid to neutral in the rapid in the subsoil and moderately slow to slow in the Owbstratum. substratum. Available water capacity is moderate in the Many areas of these soils are farmed. Some areas are Amostown soils, and the root zone extends into the woodland, and the soils are well suited to trees. Some substratum. A seasonal high water table is in the subsoil areas have been developed for homesites. of the Amostown soils in winter and early spring. ors These soils are well suited to cultivated crops and to Reaction of the soils is very strongly acid or strongly acid ay and pasture. Good tilth is easily maintained in in the subsoil and ranges from strongly acid to neutral in °cultivated areas. Wetness is the major management the substratum. concern, and subsurface drains are needed in places. The permeability of the Windsor soils is rapid or very Minimum tillage and the use of cover crops and grasses rapid in the subsoil and rapid, very rapid, or moderately ad legumes in the cropping system help to reduce slow in the substratum. Available water capacity in the runoff and improve tilth in cultivated areas. The use of Windsor soils is low, and the root zone extends into the ,Qntour tillage in unit AmB helps to control the moderate substratum. Reaction of the soils is very strongly acid or (. izard of erosion. Mixing crop residue and manure into strongly acid in the subsoil and ranges from strongly acid e surface layer improves tilth and increases the to slightly acid in the substratum. organic matter content. Proper stocking rates, deferred Most areas of these soils have been developed for azing, and pasture rotation help to maintain desirable homesites and small commercial buildings. A few areas isture.plant species. are wooded, and a few are in parks. The seasonal high water table is the main limitation of The lack of open space makes areas of this unit Poorly suited or unsuited to farming or woodland. The these soils as a site for homesites and small commercial Windsor soils have essentially no limitations as a building Mildings and, along with the slow permeability, is a site, but the seasonal water table limits the Amostown ajor limitation for septic tank absorption fields. Slope is soils for this use. Slow permeability and the seasonal also a limitation of these soils for small commercial high water table of the Amostown soils are the main ildings in unit AmB. limitation for septic tank absorption fields. he capability subclass is llw. This unit is not assigned to a capability subclass. ! ww HAMPSHIRE COUNTY, MASSACF Re. 14' BaB (Joins sheet 10) 10 A A Sc g CrE Laurel } N Sc Ma w Pork . Q 91 .ifs Ha ' ik �k CrE' U Pg ' Y Pg l Fttzgerald� crc cry ��`: e� w Lake �d . ° P = � ReBw �� WoYI L� ; o CrE a PB Lk Ha Q Pg "CrC HgA Au Lk �, Mxc - GANARY - CrC' -- REBRE Pg Ha ISLAND V c—F� p Ra - Ra CEMETER ,- .= '` `, ` 't, O r71 x -Y H A PB. �� i B J }' _ h tt t r a � �" �- y "'-.max �*$a. r '. BaB . �� 't Cam` ,� t' ��,�� x�„� � ^� CrE MzB tbLk ti BaB ` s Sw qRa V Au hs ar v Sw Au } t f ha QU ,:,,K.. a a " Ha a 'R � T 3. * Ji t � f °WbA 'F i l I j I � CrC .,-,,x- � � � i S �WhE4 F CrC .- � � � �. �ReB` --�,�� ,�''�•" _�� ,° -�,_,�� ,-,. F^.e met, 4 s v ' CrC Au _ Au ik ;Ha x \� c BaB ;. Su '• l 4 - 'f_ j i - -tom , _ Au - S @aA a � � �^ � Ba6 �:- Ha 'a"�x , Cl(i � Hg8 BaB NTERCHA GAu `,t C� Ba +1BA t�`= Ra. WS EL LL LF V� 'r `� j� Wo Ra S� Lk 07 r gB A " BaB INgC a Lk rn _Ba6 a�: ` Hg N rn AmA qu ` Au Sc .+ lld A Ws 4 0 o Ra ` �`RVS��m6 Au �; Av N, m "^° 6 WoA AmA BaB �� _ Pg y Hg6 P Au , Oy'?` '=4 �� 9 HBA AlTrB y. , �y>. ` ,w`, p �l gA Sq s# y A, 3 Au s op EsA Ra v f Ud PB� u'3P Ud �. �. A� 'AmA C " 9 Ud Ud� HgA• ,Y�nA�. � WnA,;� -e r �� Wo6�, Ra x a BaA Ra L ° .HgA � Bob Wo,B !' z o ATA y Ra BaB c k - ` .a s.'r ks7r xe �+�' BOB [`1'd 2+' ,. 1 !t WoC qu' 4unA Sc .° t f 4 r Hg`A �EsE Rz Ra 111 HgA f ;` afi HBA jyly U � \., � HgA �- "�, �.5; BaA � tL�, ;� 9°� o SBA BaBP � a Au O o BaB WoC' r # FiBA F a' 3 Ra R1m8 BoC w r BaA Ra '�; Ra AmA �Ma Bob $ � BaB Au � �� a � Ra¢ Bo8 go n p e'do S[A Ma 'Ra EsA a �aB p i�� m op _ _ Ra �" � ., �r �r o Ra Ra 'Srq �� '` � N Sc Ba6 BaA � � Y� .8�� r Sa 6 SrA 9a c�ri �o� 80 9 _ r Au � �G�� p PbB t °BaA _ : �,- - a- �_ F o Sc Qq6 Sc Pd \ j y Au Ba6 Qom$ Pu. srA __ = Qda,.,' ROUnd Ntll i ,.qC AU ice• Au ` qu Rni s�9 r An; eaq BaAr NCR �A PION Rm ! _ is uYrty s t�,. Pv:w Au q� O Au.,1 — B y BaB (Joins sheet 18) 290000 FEET - .. b��l ,.;<. BRA .-0 ;; ... . .. �� •� � iii SD/4 '9 700'BFI u^_; 4 K. 'l Ow F`. _ t •- ..�.�.., ..�'~.� Fib, , Soils e q Fool �?c z '• N o cyst .w�,"I". :•;d k., rte c s a�Pt sod �?a h :•: �s sPital y . 4(100 IN }YN A. g .•T ti 75 150 Feet 0 Appendix A: NRCS Soil Information P: 0901 S.00\reports\Drainage\appendices.doc MVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. !1 6 Conclusion in order to protect the surrounding environment from potential impacts associated with the proposed project,the proposed development will include the re- """ construction of an existing stormwater management system with new components that comply with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protections Stormwater Management Policy. ±w. Key features,including catch basins with hoods and sumps,and oil/gas separator OW that provide sediment removal prior to discharge. The development will control stormwater quantity to maintain peak flow rates less than or equal to those for existing conditions for the 2,10 and 100-year storm frequencies,prevent erosion and provide recharge at rates which approximate existing conditions. Incorporation of the above described best management practices will allow W development of the project site,benefiting the local economy,without having adverse effects on the stormwater runoff. PR P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 14 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis 1110 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table 7: Peak Discharge Rates(cfs*) Design Point 2-year 10-year 100 year Design Point 1,000 (Flow to East Wetland) Existing 17.62 30.67 47.10 Proposed 17.62 30.67 47.10 Design Point 2,000 (Flow to West Wetland) Existing 27.30 53.70 82.88 Proposed 21.71 47.21 80.96 *Cubic feet per second The results of the analysis indicate that there is a reduction in the summation of the peak flow rates from the Site between the existing and proposed conditions,resulting primarily from removal of a portion of the flow from the collection system and connection to the municipal sewage collection system. This portion of flow is estimated as follows: Flow Rate to Sewer: 4.15 cfs 6.27 cfs 8.95 cfs The proposed drainage system improves water quality by implementing a series of best management practices,including new catchbasins with 4-foot sumps and hooded outlets,oil/gas separator that provides sediment removal,and roadway and parking area sweeping. In addition to these BMP's,water quality is controlled by attenuating the peak flows to levels less than those for existing conditions. ON P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 13 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis YHB Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 5 Hydrologic Analysis Hydrologic Analysis The rainfall-runoff response of the Site under existing and proposed conditions was evaluated for storm events with recurrence intervals of 2,10 and 100 years. Rainfall volumes used for this analysis were based on the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Type III,24-hour storm event for Hampden County;they were 3.0, 4.5 and 6.4 inches,respectively. Runoff coefficients for the existing conditions and proposed conditions,as previously shown in Tables 4 and 6,respectively,were determined using NRCS Technical Release 55 (TR-55)methodology as provided in "0 HydroCAD. Drainage areas used in the analysis of existing and proposed conditions were described in previous sections and area shown on Figures 2 and 3.The HydroCAD model is based on the NRCS Technical Release 20(TR-20)Model for Project Formulation Hydrology. Detailed printouts of the HydroCAD analyses are included in Appendix B. Table 7 presents a summary of the existing and proposed conditions peak discharge rates. The following assumptions were made in the calculations: > Runoff curve numbers for the drainage areas are weighted averages based on the different types of ground cover. > A minimum time of concentration of 5 minutes was utilized as a conservative measure. Because the existing stormwater collection system is unmapped in certain areas of the campus,utilizing the minimum time of concentration provides a conservative approach to the site reaction to collected stormwater > The existing stormwater management system has been maintained to the maximum extent practical. > Infiltration and groundwater recharge has not been provided under this project. Infiltration was provided and permitted for the previous surface parking lot design.This project proposed to reduce the overall amount of on-site impervious areas. This project is considered a redevelopment of a previously developed and permitted project. P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 12 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis P:=1 8X=&MPhw&0DPANAr2&PRdwg w w ■ LEGEND DESIGN POINT DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY TIME OF CONCENTRATION r FLOW LINE SOIL TYPEBOUNDARY •..iYJ 'i ........._ 100' BUFFER ZONE .. 4-i2 0 4_4219 WETLAND BOUNDARY F r r N�~ r . r .Ij �w Vanasse Hangen Brustfin,Inc. Figure 3 May 2004 Proposed Conditions Drainage Areas Cooley Dickinson Hospital 0 Bo 160 Feet Northampton,Massachusetts ON nn MO Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. WX The proposed stormwater collection system will consist mainly of new collection mains of equal size as existing mains to relocate the existing system around the building area of the proposed garage.All new collection catchbasins will employ 4- foot sump areas and hooded outlets.This relocated collection system will continue to convey collected stormwater from upper components of the existing drainage system to the existing detention basin. The existing detention basin and outfall have been reviewed as part of this project for identification of maintenance items that would correct erosion or capacity issues. Field inspection of the detention basin have not identifies erosion issues which go require correction.Discussions with hospital personnel have not identified capacity issues with the existing basin that require correction.Therefore,there is no proposed work associated with the detention basin or existing outlet structure. PM 1* P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 10 Proposed Conditions MnVanasse Hangen Brust in,Inc. area is included as contributing flow area.This flow is directed to the on-site sewage O. collection system,which outlets to the municipal sewage collection system. Table 5 provides a comparison of the pervious and impervious surfaces for each of O„ the above described drainage areas.These conditions are included on Figure 3, Proposed Conditions Drainage Areas. Table 5: Proposed Conditions—Impervious/Pervious Surfaces Drainage Area Impervious Pervious Total Description Surface Surface Area (acres) (%) (acres) (%) (acres) Area 10 5.24 63.3% 3.04 36.7% 8.28 Area 20 6.50 34.9% 12.15 65.1% 18.65 Area 21 1.42 100.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.42 IM Totals 13.16 46.4% 15.19 53.6% 28.35 of Table 6 summarizes the key hydrologic parameters for each drainage area used in the proposed conditions analyses. Table 6: Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Data w* Description Design Area Curve Time of (Drainage Area#) Point (acres) Number Concentration(min) Area 10 X1000 8.28 88 5.0 Area 20 X2000 18.65 81 5.0 Area 21 1,42 98 5.0 ON MM P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 9 Proposed Conditions MBVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 4 Proposed Conditions The Parking Garage project includes removal of existing bituminous pavement, ew reconstruction of a portion of the existing stormwater collection system and construction of a new parking garage for 660-spaces,with all associated underground utilities. The existing drainage patterns have been maintained to the maximum extent possible,but have been altered in one area in order to allow for construction of the parking garage.The post construction hospital campus will contain three drainage areas,described as follows. Drainage Area 10 is the same composition as Drainage Area 10 analyzed under existing conditions.This drainage area is composed of the eastern portion of the campus,and includes the existing hospital buildings,parking areas and on landscape/grass areas. The existing stormwater runoff from this area is analyzed at design point X1000,which flows directly into the wetland area located south of W. Drainage Area. Drainage Area 20 is composed of the western portion of the campus as well as flow from a large parking area located between the existing hospital building and Locust Street.This drainage area is also the same drainage area analyzed under existing conditions with one exception.The drainage flow from the proposed parking garage is removed from the stormwater collection system and connected to the municipal sewage system.The result of this connection is a reduction in stormwater flow to the existing detention basin located south of the project site.This drainage area includes rw the remaining parking areas and landscape/grass areas for the hospital campus.The existing stormwater runoff from this area is analyzed at design point X2000,and flows into the wetland area located south of Drainage Area 20 after treatment by an existing detention basin. Drainage Area 21S is the afore-mentioned stormwater flows originating from the proposed parking garage.The footprint area of the garage is less than that of the existing surface parking. The analysis of the stormwater flow from the garage includes the majority of flow originating from the top parking deck,which is ±! exposed to full weather. The remaining 3-lower decks are shielded from weather by the upper decks and the parapet walls surrounding the deck area,thus reducing the amount of contributing flow.For these three lower deck areas,5-percent of the floor P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 8 Proposed Conditions i i� ! t �. �� 1 A, � 11 '!,+' - � � � i i i i i f j t i i i �B� 0 BVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. According to the NRCS Soil Survey of Hampden County,Massachusetts,Central Part,the Site consists of numerous soil types.The various soil types and their corresponding soil hydrological group are shown below in Table 3and represented in Figure 4. R Table 3 Existing Soil Groups Map Symbol Soil Name Hydrologic Soil Group Au Amostown Windsor B BoB Boxford Silt Loam C BoC Boxford Silt Loam C HgA Hinckley Loamy Sand A Ma Meckesville Loam C Ra Raynham Silt Loam C SrA Sudbury fine sandy Loam B AmB Amostown Fine Sandy Loam C Table 4 summarizes the key hydrologic parameters for each drainage area used in the existing conditions analysis. Table 4: Existing Conditions Hydrologic Data Description Design Area Curve Time of (Drainage Area#) Point (acres) Number Concentration(min) Area 10 X1000 8.28 88 5 Area 20 X2000 19.88 83 5 P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 6 Existing Conditions I11B Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,lnc. 3 Existing Conditions The Project Site that will be built upon at this time consists of an existing bituminous No surface parking lot for approximately 187 patient,visitor and staff vehicles. There are natural resources found adjacent to the work site,including a large wetland area located to the south Mp The existing conditions hydrologic analysis was performed for both Drainage areas of the hospital campus.Drainage Area 10 is composed of the eastern portion of the W, campus,and includes the existing hospital buildings,parking areas and landscape/grass areas.The existing stormwater runoff from this area is analyzed at design point X1000,which flows directly into the wetland area located south of Drainage Area. Drainage Area 20 is composed of the western portion of the campus as well as flow from a large parking area located between the existing hospital building and Locust Street.This drainage area includes the remaining parking areas and landscape/grass areas for the hospital campus.The existing stormwater runoff from this area is analyzed at design point X2000,and flows into the wetland area located south of Drainage Area 20 after treatment by an existing detention basin. Table 2 provides a summary of the pervious and impervious surfaces for each of the above described drainage areas.These existing conditions are shown on Figure 2, Existing Conditions Drainage Areas. Table 2: Existing Conditions—Impervious/Pervious Surfaces Drainage Area Impervious Pervious Total Description Surface Surface Area (acres) (%) (acres) (%) (acres) Area 10 5.24 63.3% 3.04 36.7% 8.28 Area 20 8.29 41.7% 11.59 58.3% 19.88 Totals 13.53 48.0% 14.63 52.0% 28.16 P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 5 Existing Conditions I110 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 2 Introduction OR This proposed project consists of the removal of an existing surface parking area and stormwater collection system, reconstruction of an existing stormwater collection system to accommodate the construction of a proposed parking garage,and the actual construction of a 660-space,4-level parking garage. The overall hospital campus is divided into two separate drainage areas, each outletting to two separate wetlands located south of the campus. The drainage area and wetland system to the east is unaffected by this proposed project,with pre and post construction stormwater flows unchanged. The drainage area and wetland system to the west will experience a slight reduction in stormwater flows as a result of the proposed project. This report provides an analysis of the existing and proposed stormwater management systems for the 2,10 and the 100-year storm. . w P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 4 Introduction PAM18.00cadMP1anm ure I.dwa s X, PIR �t Marys cem Pill Site .v� it -�-4 * 44- } •fit a• { f� �i+ r.? � �^ �' •� ti a.., r)�'`t } a r _ j •. F '� >�f �A * S .� '�•#`-- M.':-�+'""r•. # ''�'w' i+M�.r. * nom•::: • _�• � �1� f�••; r +� �- • Sch w PP, *Fire St8 ` • ' •� • �•k.• �, • •• `� � y Sib E , � - - ' `Jf• > AR f r • • �y • • � a� . �� "t 'R �. 4,. �Y Shopping, Center c rr• POP • t G r � M a Ines; Field t� t, � ✓ x f M1 �' s �� `►�► •• ri ` y *• f •• -.�. • ••i• / �. y ( E4 ..... <-_ .,� �, r'A •��-. ',��Y{ .A..,�� of{ •�•� �� Gall:t?S •, ./ , - ,Aiu! . '�!� k �, ' `� , 1 (` '• �0�Q '� � ) ! � y�`�' "1ft18 f�1`�:�,3tOf1 v • • k • f �� Site Location Map Figure 1 June 2004 T Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton,Massachusetts N.T.S. esewn� !�� s� � �� -s �� A�sel�� si�� Ilw�� 11��1�� CIA �� +�w� ew�+� mn.w �•..� !� o te. N►GE-rxaq ,. ` ::....:' : LEGEND EA. s DESIGN POINT X DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY sf of TIME OF CONCENTRATION : ; '- .�= I ;�•.1; � s'� ,':••� FLOW LINE 's� ;;_..--_ :::•::�:�::, SOIL TYPEBOUNDARY _ 'sf — — — — — 100' BUFFER ZONE 200 zzo 4_219 WETLAND BOUNDARY a.. : . s s a � ' :Z.:/ ARE Vanasse ■ Figure 2 May 2004 Existing Conditions Drainage Areas Cooley Dickinson Hospital W 0 60 160 Feet Northampton,Massachusetts as ? - Y NOTE: NRCS SOIL TYPES WERE TAKEN j FROM "SOIL SURVEY OF HAMPSHIRE COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, CENTRAL '.... F FF. BOB PART, DECEMBER 1981, SHEET 14." .h z? 04:Can.. : •• W 4-1 r: F r x :.m , .,.. .:.:. .. .............? 9A.� .................... N& LEGEND :r.4r .:.. �.: •YF.•vri: :. . �/F�try � �>"` r;- ''t•,. ,/�/// /"Fj/.!/.�/// ///� rF,��, 'hE,}�y.. ;} rye: /� // // ,:•{:? '` , i• r DESIGN POINT ` " x: f DRAINAGE ARE A BOUNDARY ' ;;+ ,,.:; _'`Mi:'<' 3Et f <• TIME OF CONCENTRATION F <N "aY ''•g FLOW LINE Ra T SOIL TYPEBOUNDARY w >' } F ` 100' BUFFER ZONE �? / +-220 4-279 WETLAND BOUNDARY 4. F � i u if FF /."• 5• 'i:' •'LV;: 2;':;::,} Fw:�:'yd :;YR•}•?: ,;Fr k?j } * ytzP v. . ............... } `rr f�• : HgA .h•• �,..V.: Si f x Figure 4 May 2004 Soils Map Cooley Dickinson Hospital 0 75 150 Feet Northampton,Massachusetts vi MVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. present in the field. The proposed conditions evaluation considers each work area as a separate design point, which are cumulatively considered in determining downstream impacts. Table 1 presents a summary of these conditions peak discharge rates: Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates(cfs*) Design Point 2-year 10-year 100 year Design Point 1,000 (Flow to East Wetland) Existing 17.62 30.67 47.10 § Proposed 17.62 30.67 47.10 Design Point 2,000 (Flow to West Wetland) Existing 27.30 53.70 82.88 Proposed 21.71 47.21 80.96 *Cubic feet per second The analysis indicates that the project experiences an overall decrease in post development stormwater runoff rates from all design storms. With this reduction, there is an increase in flow to the municipal sewage collection system,resulting from the parking garage flow. This flow is calculated as follows: Flow Rate to Sewer: 4.15 cfs 6.27 cfs 8.95 cfs The proposed stormwater management system will maintain stormwater water quality by implementing a series of best management practices, including deep sump catchbasins, oil/gas and sediment separators, and garage parking area sweeping. Recharge to groundwater is accomplished through previous design efforts permitted at the time of the surface parking lot, which is accomplished through infiltration areas located below the detention basin outlet elevations. In summary, the best management practices and stormwater management system included in the design of this overall project will provide a benefit to the environment through enhanced stormwater quality and reduced downstream flooding. P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 2 Executive Summary I11u Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Executive Summary This Drainage and Stormwater Quality Report was prepared for The Cooley Dickinson Hospital in support of a project that proposes to construct a 660-space, 4-level parking garage. The garage is located on land currently owned by Cooley Dickinson Hospital on Locust Street in the City of Northampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts. This stormwater management report analyzes the project and summarizes total project impacts to the downstream watershed area. The proposed project will be placed on an area currently utilized as a surface parking lot. This area is currently paved and improved to include a stormwater collection system and stormwater detention basin,both of which were previously permitted and approved through the City of Northampton The detention basin outlets to an established wetland resource area located further south on the overall hospital campus. The proposed parking structure has been sized so the footprint of the structure fits within the limits of the existing bituminous surface parking lot. With the structure being slightly smaller in footprint area than the parking lot,the resulting impact with respect to impervious area is that post construction will realize a reduction in impervious area. Overall drainage patterns will be maintained to the maximum extent practicable, with the following exception. Because the surface drainage will now originate from a structure, collected in floor drains placed within the deck of the parking garage,the drainage from the structure must be treated through an oil and gas separator. The Massachusetts Plumbing Code requires that outlets from interceptors and separators be connected to the sewerage system. The net effect of this connection will be a reduction in flow realized by the existing detention basin, and an increase in flow to the municipal sewage collection system. Outletting the oil and gas separator to the detention basin, and ultimately the wetland area, will increase the possibility of fuel product causing contamination of the resource area. The remnants of the existing stormwater management system will require minor reconstruction to remove them from the footprint area of the proposed structure and accommodate grade changes required for the project. This relocated system will consist of hooded catch basins with deep sumps, out-letting to detention basins designed for the 100- year storm. This will improve stormwater quality and reduce peak flow rates for the 2, 10 and 100-year storm,thus reducing the possibility of downstream flooding. A HydroCAD model,using TR-20 methodology,was developed to evaluate the existing and proposed conditions. The existing conditions evaluation is based on the conditions currently P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 1 Executive Summary MBVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary..........................................................................................................1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................4 ExistingConditions..........................................................................................................6 ProposedConditions........................................................................................................9 HydrologicAnalyses......................................................................................................13 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................15 List of Figures Figure 1: Key Map of Site Areas Figure 2:Existing Conditions Drainage Areas Figure 3: Proposed Conditions Drainage Areas Figure 4:Soils Map List of Tables Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates-Executive Summary Table 2: Existing Conditions—Impervious/Pervious Surfaces Table 3: Existing Soil Groups Table 4: Existing Conditions Hydrologic Data Table 5: Proposed Conditions—Impervious/Pervious Surfaces Table 6: Proposed Conditions—Hydrologic Data Table 7: Peak Discharge Rates Appendices Appendix A: NRCS Soils Information Appendix B: Hydrologic Analyses Appendix C: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan P:\09018.00\reports\Drainage\report.doc 1 Table Of Contents r7l"ll II Stormwater Management Report Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared by VMNanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Springfield, Massachusetts June 2004 4. w�+w � o i wo-way 3iop k-onTxoi rage./, of z, Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 12.8 LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) 12.8 [Approach LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d PP am 1, A + A P)I/)Ann Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Elm Street at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2010 Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Elm Street North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 r Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments +, Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 i L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 25 185 0 0 195 25 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 28 212 0 0 237 30 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 "" — 0 -- 4 Median type Undivided * FIT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 i L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 0 35 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.78 ,,, Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 76 0 44 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 1 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 28 120 Capacity, cm(vph) 1297 583 /c ratio 0.02 0.21 Queue length (95%) 0.07 0.77 r- rrr. r. m..n m.. ..-, ., i• • it M r.nn ,. m � � . rn rnnn Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.8 23.9 LOS A C Approach delay 23.9 (s/veh) Epproach LOS C P0 HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d pgCF Ps F. Fm I WO-w ay 3wp UOnLroi ra�c i ui TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i General Information Site Information .. Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Woodlawn Avenue Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 211712004 nal sis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 Build Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion f East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Woodlawn Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 a Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ,,,, Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 120 695 0 0 590 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate 149 868 0 0 670 22 (veh/h Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided „ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 G Configuration L T TR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 190 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 5 0 211 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy i, 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHV 0 0 Percent.grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Dela , Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound t Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume,1v(vph) 149 216 Capacity, cm (vph) 898 402 /c ratio 0.17 0.54 Queue length (95%) 0.59 3.08 *, io.iir.�r� ,o„r�01�n�„ am�nentlrnrtc\�rnofAT�,\T nr X101 7n Cattir,nc\TPrrrn\„71rSFi trr+r All I'Mnd F imn�vvuyzzop umo�o/ �a�c �oz � pproach delay pproach LOS -- D HCS200drm Copyright 0 2003 University of Flori&� U1 Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Pm � 0� �` '"`^``-------^-",""--^",="cl-^'-_^,--.-",, ---,", ^n, jl%^"' � 1 wo-way stop uonrroi rage 1 of TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection VMHDD2 lm Street Agency/Co. VHR, Inc. Jurisdiction Date Performed 17/2 004 nalysis Year Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion I East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Elm Street r Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments F Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 550 25 330 450 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 687 31 375 511 0 I (veh/h) I Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHV 0 -� -- 3 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 15 0 265 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 15 0 281 0 0 0 (veh/h Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration I R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v(vph) 375 15 281 Capacity, cm (vph) 878 40 440 sip /c ratio 0.43 0.38 0.64 Queue length (95%) 2.16 1.28 4.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.1 141.4 26.5 vim A Mt i,)nnn Two-Way Stop Control Fage 2,of 2 PM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 8.6 19.6 LOS B A C Approach delay (s/veh) 19,6 [Approach LOS HCS2000rM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d t. P" A I I/r%n A Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 or TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL_ SUMMARY i General Information Site Information Route 9 at Denniston nal st LMC Intersection Place Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 1712004 Analysis Year 010 Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Pr East/West Street: Route 9 oject Description CDH Hospital Ex ansion North/South Street: Denniston Place Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ** Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R i Volume veh/h) 295 505 0 15 460 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.75 1.00 s Hourly Flow Rate 327 561 0 20 613 0 (veh/h Proportion of heavy 0 _ _ 0 ehicles, PHV Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes i 1 0 0 1 0 a Configuration L TR LT ! Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 *, L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 0 75 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Hourly Flow Rate 6 0 100 0 0 0 (veh/h Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 ehicles, PHV Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LR Volume,v(vph) 327 20 106 Lei, Capacity, cm (vph) 976 1020 352 /c ratio 0.34 0.02 0.30 Queue length (95%) 1 1.48 0.06 1.24 ___t elf nn[ _uC-�_\T__��\__ 17_AT��_ A/117 11Nr1rlA HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions - w/signal adjustment 3- Route 9 & Prospect Street Evening Peak Hour j Lan f Configurations fcl'a�` -`o l�~1�. .��° 190D_ '1.�0= �;t.9T�D .�9_D0� -�.� �• �•�'`t� •,��--�x�` == t=y-:...-�ae£� � 4.,.<rict�«rna-:.n.�g .,.°;r�,K ':e�;..sV m-. x:.-.�^...�.,�.:�t`+.,.x_-�..u.`..-,:.�'.^g.�,+'w�... .• K.y�."�ss.':�_.,�.....,vt�'...��a2+�3.:�a:,: °-"ss��` Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ Frt 1.00 0.85 0.85 ` `i •c• _'.�- -,�- ., ,u,. i s'° '.,.. .:�-s�w:s-• � i�x�. `• .�.:';..�.,..... _ ..:�*�» K.'�`.,'a_ xgcn+x. m.w�,�' �s�i.�� E Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1615 1615 Satd. Flow(perm) _1805 1615 �� ' ^Y � �}� � •, �� _.. awv �r�'_"�,w- � � ,..,,��•" .'��,� rte' � � ,-�^�' . Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 I Lane Group Flowoo(vph) 0 60 343 42 a Sys. .,. c5 -_°, h° Turn Type Split Perm Perm q y a sxx t — 5 .b .w.,�.,5.�� 1 .�,�r �� 'ia .,«e:.;•..� -.a.�":�: Permitted Phases _ 4 4 ME Effective Green,g (s) 20.3 20.3 20.3 �. Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 I 4� .x �x Lane Grp Cap(vph) 431 385 385 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.03 Uniform Delay,d1 25.5 31.3 25.3 _ r^+'c ^c ^Is p M-t,: Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 21.8 0.1 MMW�1s � M Level of Service C D C Approach LOS D WIN f. \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Main PM35K.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 no HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions - w/signal adjustment 9 p 3: Route 9 & Prospect Street Evening Peak Hour I Lane Configurations ��, ►� ��, �r '1'F ciFf �-��QOJ00 190 1�,, Q0� On 9 D Q0�90( " 1 �;-90Q,_�1900�.F Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4.0 4.0 0 t7 ff�m X10 Frt 0 99 1 00 0.99 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.85 Satd Flow (prot) 3505 1787 3526 1805 1615 1697 1553 -yam _ �. 5 _. Satd. Flow (perm) �y 3283 1787 352(6��' 1805 1615 1697 155{3y '2T, aY�v.GiiF S�'t.w.9 +aa S`�1 W Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 . 0.90 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.75 0.75 Wi Lane Group Fiow(vph) �0 702 0 17 495 0 0 146 189 140 0 3 Tum Type Perm Prot Split Perm Prot custom Permitted Phases 2 3 9 Effective G reen,g (s) 19.9 3 2 271 11.6 11.6 10.1 10.1 Clearance Time(s) 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 768 67 1123 246 220 201 184 .6 �- .-'RFNM .. v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 c0.12 0.01 p Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 39.8 23.0 34.5 36.0 36.0 33.3 Incremental Delay, d2 15.3 2.0 0.3 3.8 26.7 10.0 0.2 Level of Service D D C D E D C ram+^ x• •. Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay 42.1 HCM Level of Service D Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85 1 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 c Critical Lane Group do \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Main PM35K.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 OR Two-Way Stop Control rage 2,OT 2, LOS A A E D Approach delay 39.6 30.5 (s/veh) Approach LOS E D HCS2000M Copyright(D 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d ppa I W(.)-VVQy 3LOP l,_01ILJUI rQ�'C 1 01 G I see TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed V1 7/2004 Analysis Year 2010 Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments €' Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 605 15 20 725 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.97 ourllly Flow Rate 5 679 16 20 747 5 Proportion of heavy _ vehicles, PHV 0 _ 0 E Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 20 0 15 5 0 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 f Hourly Flow Rate 26 0 20 6 0 6 veh/h' Proportion of heavy 0 D vehicles, P 0 0 0 0 HV 1. Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 ■ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,,,, Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LR olume,v(vph) 5 20 46 12 Capacity, cm(vph) 867 910 149 153 /c ratio 0.01 0.02 0.31 0.08 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.07 1.22 0.25 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 9.0 39.6 30.5 e f;lo-//( -\Tln�nmcntc�7(lon�lQ17(1QA+t:n rc\1 �ctalli\T nrolCl/�C1Cctt�nno\Tamr+\n �l 1R tm.+ AP)1I MCIA RM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions -w/signal adjustment 3: Route 9 & North Maple Street Evening Peak Hour Lane Configurations , j �w NdE1a•.v��v � ,a�0��.;.��904��9900' 1�OOA�,1.9}OD_t�1 09 0�900�,�t:90Q90�� 1�DD �-19�O�P��00` Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 . Frt 0.99 0.99 0 g 0 5 OW ., _. ,.w..y, .�`.,.<' m : }}9Pt•ar '.. ,yam, a''ti' ,r` , ,: 'e 5 Satd. Flow{prot) 1819 18511 173_7 1740 Satd. Flow (perm) 1642 1688 1542 1586 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 569 0 0 755 0 0 192 0 0 261 0 Turn Type Perm _ Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 6 - 8 ^ 4 WN - Effective Green, g (s} 35.0 5.0 17.0 17.0 s : yew_ Clearance Time(s) 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ` y 3 � v/s Ratio Prot _ - v/c Ratio 0.59 0.77 0.44 0.58 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k g... 9-.:. ��_, - �.z.. sY� •,..ate'��.�°_„,°z�° _"are.""Pxsxa..,d".'°�- "--..,ks -....- Delay(s) 1 Q.7 15.1 20.8 23.9 i i Approach Delay(s) 10.7 15.1 20.8 23.9 ; v HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 n - y - o- last Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.8% ICU Level of Service F r 2 \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Maple PM35k.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 Im I YVV-TV ay I-ILLIIJ �,UIIUUI r ago G ui Control Dela (s/veh) 7.6 10.5 LOS A B Approach delay 10.5 (s/veh) .Epproach LOS B HCS200drM Copyright m 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Il file //(' \T�nrnmPntc�/�7(land%�(1CPttinacllractPlli\T nral%7f)CPttinoc\TPmn\n7kd1 tm-n d/?1 IX)OA w I wv-vv ay 3Lv.P �vuuvl rage 1 OI L low i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Elm Street at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Im Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2010 Build I Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Elm Street North/South Street: Hospital Road i Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 E Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 k L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 35 225 0 0 80 60 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate F (veh/h) 38 244 0 0 97 73 Proportion of heavy t vehicles, PHV 2 -- -- 0 -- -- z e Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound E; K Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R - Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 15 0 15 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.80 +w Hourly Flow Rate D 0 0 18 0 18 (veh/h Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 D 0 0 D 0 i Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N C Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 } Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 k Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume,v (vph) 38 36 Capacity, cm(vph) 1407 691 /c ratio 0.03 0.05 Queue length (95%) 0.08 0.16 f;la //('•\Tlnrimantc�l7(lan��7nCatt�nrTO\1��etP11�\T nn o1Q/2(1Cattirnc\TAm,.\„71 11 tm,� AIlI1)nnn ON Two-Way Stop Control Page 2,of 2, MR Control Delay(s/veh) 8.9 14.4 LOS A Pq A proach delay 14.4 (s/veh) Epproach LOS -- B HCS2000,"'4 Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d F. Cf Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 i i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information '" Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Woodlawn venue i Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 7712004 nalysis Year 010 Build Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour s i Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Woodlawn Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 i I Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 175 765 0 0 435 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 z Hourly Flow Rate 175 765 0 0 435 20 ,, veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 ehicles, PHV 4 -- -- -- s Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 p Configuration L T TR ! ! stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 +*" L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 75 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 w, Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 5 0 75 (veh/h) t Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 5 vehicles, PHv Percent grade (%) 0 0 Y Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR olume,v(vph) 175 80 + , Capacity, cm (vph) 1095 464 /c ratio 0.16 0.17 Queue length (95%) 0.57 0.62 �" I WU-VV dy 3 LU.P 1-1111U U1 LOS B E E Approach delay (s/veh) 44.6 Approach LOS -- E RCS2000TM Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d N. Y. it A 11i P)AA A Two-Way Stop Control rage i of 2, L TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i General Information Site Information ► Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Elm.Street Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2010 Buiid Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Elm Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 L T R L T R i Volume veh/h) 0 590 15 170 340 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.86 1.00 ... Hourly Flow Rate 0 678 17 197 395 0 veh/h Proportion of heavy Jim vehicles, PHV 0 __ -- 4 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 A. Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T !Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 1 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h). 10 0 350 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 P Hourly Flow Rate 10 0 376 0 0 0 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, P Hv 5 0 5 0 0 0 , Percent grade (%) 0 0 ` Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 197 10 376 Capacity,cm (vph) 891 107 442 /c ratio 0.22 0.09 0.85 Queue length (95%) 0.84 0.30 8.45 Control Delay(s/veh) 10.2 42.1 44.7 w I WO-Wdy 3LOP%-,UI1LIOI Ul L Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 9.3 13.1 Los A A Approach delay (s/veh) 13.1 bpproach LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1. ii AI)I Ilmn A 1 wo-way stop uomroi rage 1 OT 2- TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Denniston Place Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 1712004 Analysis Year 2010 Build Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Denniston Place Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 i Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 405 650 15 55 285 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 421 677 15 73 380 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1. l Configuration L TR LT , Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound is Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 0 0 10 0 0 0 r Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 10 0 0 0 (veh/h) G Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 D 0 0 0 0 ism Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 r RT Channeiized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Dela Queue Len th, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound w Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LR Volume,v(vph) 421 73 10 Capacity, cm (vph) 1190 912 452 /c ratio 0.35 0.08 0.02 Queue length (95%) 1.62 0.26 0.07 :imp 4W A/'11 trinnA i F I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions - w/signal adjustment I 3: Route 9 & Prospect Street Morning Peak Hour Lane Configurations ` I idalow , php) s1900 190Q-�- 190Q'=11900 .. _ _,. .-a nm_.. . _ ,, ,saw -�, •. I Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 I >.,.ta8' 'ix�'�G-.r, �m �M .-.a �.'••4.�..- 4'r.,�eMFkr�.-.:w- i�.Y._ z.:w"..`r.-..^s-x±.,��ivnSVS.... ,v. rc-4_!. ,e5...r= ._•�s - ,.,�+ `�'-'�;vt?S?*.c:..F3: I Frt 1.00 0.85 0.85 P %MEW PR aatd Flow(prof). i 805 1615 i 6 i 5 � E Satd Flow(perm) 1805 1615 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.4 0.91 0.91 0.91 t Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 115 176 22 E Turn Type Split Perm Perm =x s a . Permitted Phases 77j� _ Effective Green,g (s) 12 4 12 4 12.4 " _ k Lane Grp Cap(vph) 263 235 235 4 v/s Ratio Perm C0.11 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 33 2 34.9 31 5 - I Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 12.3 0.2 - iL." mist- Level Y. +Pig- may_ '!• of Service C D C w 1 4 -.< � - - [ oar 7, h - !i. 5 - Approach LOS D 1 1L I' i l f' p.. < K H \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Main AM35K.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions -w/signal adjustment ^^ 3: Route 9 & Prospect Street Morning Peak Hour a NM 'N f j Lane Configurations 0 ^ t - 9 _ { IdeI F1Tarirptpl} 1�0 y90d100 19dD i 90 1900 19(30 1"900 190© X9.00 �90Qk 60 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 I Frt 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.85 1.00 0.85 , Satd Flow(prof) 3514 1719 3393 1713 1490 1770 1583 Satd. Flow(perm) 3351 1719 3393 1713 1490 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.96 0.96 0.96 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 932 £0 69 287 0 0 70 70 146 104 0 a 79- o Q Turn Type Perm Prot custom Permitted Phases 2 t 4 4 8 Effective Green, g (s) 28.5 5.7 38.2 8.0 8.0 10.5 10.5 Clearance Tim�pe (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 _ rib W! HIT MEN $7i 7 .. u.:. fx. Lane .._v a .-..n ...,.a Grp Cap (vph) 1122 115 1523 161 140 218 195 fl4 G :08 v/s Ratio Perm u w c0.28?�B r� _ 0.07 _ � �� iw,".-dr,:6L'a.'l � ,�� ..?��•3 Y� -°`�'t--3t Y �� s17ry ��` Uniform Delay,d1 26.1 38.6 14.1 36.4 36.6 35.6 35.0 t Incremental Delay, d2 5.4 8.2 0.1 X1.9 2.8 7.6 2.8 f Level of Service C D B D D D D f ��-��,��Qii 'L/ -,.� =a- ��i -��` n..o,.- �� '� �,ti. -. j:.- �� -�.�" •ter- f. ... Approach LOS C C D D HCM Average Control Delay 32.8 HCM Level of Service C I•-f£�� e tom �it�� to• �,�:.� 7�==�-:y�_�' �._.._w_....��' -�`��`-�'`� y --`- ____zs� `; � Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.1 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 l: ttersect } Ut� 90 �t_ uelenn8 e ' ii :'au _ c Critical Lane Group r AM \\mawaid\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Main AM35K.sy6 +.. Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 i PO Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 .ON LOS A 3 E D pproach delay 40.3 27.4 (s/veh) pproach LOS E D .HCS2006TM Copyright C 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d yf tti ON qi L 1 wo-way,siop Lontrol rage t or L TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ion Analyst LMC Intersection. Route 9 at Hospital Road i Agency/Co.. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2010 Build Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour i Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hos itai Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 3 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T - R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 875 20 15 395 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate 5 961 21 16 424 5 (veh/h Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 4 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R *� Volume veh/h) 20 0 15 5 0 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 F Hourly Flow Rate 26 0 20 6 0 6 "' (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 4 0 4 0 0 0 Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 ,,, RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR j Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound t Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 e Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LF? Volume, v(vph) 5 16 46 12 Capacity, cn, (vph) 1130 695 147 173 /c ratio 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.07 1.24 0.22 irae Control Delay (s/veh) 1 8.2 10.3 40.3 27.4 ')A--.]!7 n x'11 PI and I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Build Conditions - w/signal adjustment 3: Route 9 & North Maple Street Morning Peak Hour 1 I Lane Configurations Idea!�l aver(fi x 7 900 190f} 1900 190D 9017 xi J00 1900 900 r�71900 1:900 "1900 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 E LanTw' i� ..,.FU..m�u : `1 a0 -} t 1 00;I ,4- �„F I wxz...:�;i� s.'r .. .. '._ _zm..s-.. a .,.�.... \ � .. . Frt 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.97 f✓I�s�P�'o-tie ,,��. ,� � � �.3:9- -f,.;�.�<� a �,� °,� . � ; .,- � , - Satd.Fiow (prof) 712 1805 1659 1733 Satd. Flow (perm) 1684 1481 1561 1489 OM Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.82 f on RM aitU Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 873 0 0 444 0 0 188 0 0 195 0 -g z- . k � �� 814 6� Turn Type Perm Perm Perm _ Perm Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 =_4�ctive - 6 1 w 0 s) 35.0 35 0 17 0 17 0 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -.cn � . , s . _ m s' �i v/s Ratio Prot f} � v/c Ratio 0.89 0.51 0.43 0.46 _Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 a 1.00 - Delay(s) 22.7 _ 9.6 _ 20.5 21.3 ; Approach Delay(s) 22.7 9.6 20.5 21.3 !¢s HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.6% ICU Level of Service F \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\Build\35K-MOB\R9-Maple AM35k.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 I --I -I -- -I .--,.1 ._..4,1 ..-A .--I ---1 _..-A ---1 --1 --A :I_-1 1 -:-,-I -z --I :I Two-Way Stop Control Pale 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 12.1 A LOS B Approach delay 12.1 (stv-eh) jApproach LOS B Copyright 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d BCS200OTM IMF ri no Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Elm Street at Hospital nalyst LMC intersection Road j Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour E Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/!`lrest Street: Elm Street North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 t Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 i L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 20 185 0 0 195 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.82 0,82 Hourly Flow Rate 22 212 0 0 237 24 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy 2 ' -- { -- 0 -- s vehicies, PHV „ Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound a Movement 7 8 9 10 1 11 12 69 L T R L _ _ T R Volume(veh/h} 0 0 0 45 1 0 25 r Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 0.78 1.00 0.78 ■. Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 57 0 32 '. (veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 vehicles, PHV Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service l Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound . Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v(vph) 22 89 Capacity, cm (vph) 1303 593 /c ratio 0.02 0.15 0.53 Queue length (95%) 0.'05 F PM Two-Way Stop Control Paae 2 of 2 t Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 21.7 LOS A C i Approach delay _ _ 21.7 (s/Veh) _ Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2006TM Cop)Tight 2003 linivmiTy of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d { I i f RM x e x h i t E k G w l s e G t r 'r P V E f! k h I((; Ei r: r PF f F 4 G ..R Two-Way Stop Control Paue 1 of 2 i r i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Woodlawn Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Avenue Date Performed 211712004 Jurisdiction MHD D2 Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour nafysis Year 2010 No Build 1 t i Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/bliest Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Woodlawn Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments "'" Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 115 625 0 0 570 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF. 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 s Hourly Flow Rate 143 781 0 0 647 22 * (veh/h) Proportion of heavy 3 _ 0 -- y vehicles, PHV Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR 6 Upstream Signal L 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound F Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 4 Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 185 =, Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 205 Proportion of heavy *s, 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHV Percent grade /.) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 D 1 0 1 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 1 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 143 210 Capacity, cm (vph) 916 422 /c ratio 0.16 0.50 Queue length (95%) 0.55 2.70 Pa Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Jt LOS B F C pproach delay (s/veh) 25,5 jApproach LOS D I-JCS2000TIII Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d hh kP Ee r. f. r. ii Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information "" Analyst LMC jintersection IRoute,9 at Elm Street Agency/Co. VHS, Inc. Purisdiction JMHD 02 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year PO No Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Elm Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 8 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 490 25 325 430 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) p 672 31 369 488 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 7 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 15 0 250 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 l Hourly Flow Rate 15 0 265 0 0 0 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 1 0 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N r Storage 0 0 . RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R 160 Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound a Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 w. Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 369 15 265 Capacity, cm (vph) 937 50 485 /c ratio 039 0.30 0.55 Queue length (95%) 1.90 1.04 3.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3 105.3 21.0 .r, Control Delay(s/veh) 10.0 8.4 22.7 LOS B A C Approach delay ?" 22.7 (s/veh) pproach LOS HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I I I t { 1 { 11 F f1fEF E E� y�n t E f �i f T, 4 i; f I. G \l�nrlimintc%?Tan,�0 7�?n.Cettinacl lrac telli\T tmn TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ,,, Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 of Denniston Place Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour F oject Description CDH Hospital Expansion st/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Denniston Place f ersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 ! i ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound I Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 270 515 0 5 450 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 270 515 0 6 600 0 g Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 w Lanes 1 i 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound t Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R " Volume (veh/h) 5 0 15 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 20 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 11-anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR AM Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LR Volume, v(vph) 270 6 26 Capacity, cm (vph) 987 1061 229 /c ratio 0.27 0.01 0.11 Oueue length (95%) 1.12 0.02 0.38 wee fi Mn U1l nnn4 WO No Build Conditions Evening Peak Hour PW 3: Route 9 & Prospect Street Default Movement SWL2 SWL SWR SWR2 I Lane Configurations f Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' Lane-Util. Factor 1.00 1,00 .1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.85 Protected- 0 95? 1 00, 1 OQ Satd Flow (prot) 1805 1615 i 615 FIt Perm fitt .66 Satd Flow (Perm) 1805 1615 1615 s V o'lur�e(v_ph} = }_0. 25 285 35 _.: r Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 I Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 42 343 42 Jeaue'hacJes Turn Type Split Perm Perm a J' otecterl_Ptaases 7. _ - ya-av- Permitted_Phases 7 7 Actinreer G (s 19 6J 5t 'a13 r— -_._ ` L Effective Green, g (s) 20.6 20.6 20.6 n xlctt�at� �C#.��i:� , � '�� D21 - r� 1��5� s.��•"`Bi'� -.:�h .a- ,, s 3 . _ _ . .� s, I. s Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 385 344 344 _ 7 h v/s Ratio Perm c0 21 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 30.7 38.0 30.7 - F tits ' incremental Delay, d2 0.1 47.4 0.2 PO Dews 30 8 E., Level of Service C F C .pro c3a ay`( 4 7 � _° r .. ... � � . Approach iLOS E Intersection Summary O 4 t I' ` \\mawaid\checkin\06855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\No_Build\R9-Main PMNB_sy6 Synchro 5.0 FW Page 2 VANASSLVL7-FF51 ,.P i No Build Conditions Evening Peak Hour 3: Route 9 & Prospect Street Default - -► '� '� 4 imp Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBR2 SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations *'T tT. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190.0 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0:95 1.00 0.95 1:00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 FIt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00Y 0.95 1:0Q 0:95 .1- Satd. Flow(prot) 3518 1787 3525 1805 1615 1736 1553 Flt Pd.rmitted. 0�4 0 95 00 0,24: 1 OQ 0 95 1°OD Satd. Flow (perm) 3296 1787 3525 463 1615 1736 1553 ., Uolume (vph) 45 25` S5 410 __ _._ s Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ad1,; 1ow(up1,) ._6572 17, 444 °, 45. 30=; f 34 107 27 7 3 ' Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 696 0 11 489 0 0 97 134 107 40 0 _ % 0%' Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perri Prot N Protected Phases`- yz. Permitted Phases 2 4 4 8 Effective Green, g (s) 25.0 1.2 30.2 19.6 19.6 10.3 10.3 M Xlc ate XTtatio 0�6 r _ 0 20'3 2D �0.Ili r 0 1 x g0 01 0 L ' _.. Clearance Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.0 5.0 �/shcle E�ensior�=�s��'�_ �..._�� -3� �.0,`,� }��4 r:•� 5 0-, .�3� � 3frD �1��,��. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 852 22 1101 94 327 185 165 v/s Ratio Perm w c0.21 c0.21 0.08 - 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 33.7 47.5 26.5 38 5 33.5 41.1 39.6 Incremental Delay, d2 6.1 16.8 0.3 101.8 0.8 4.3 0.8 14�34 4 I'M € O Ian/s _ 39 _ y 64 2w26 8 U _ .._ ..� __ .�..�,. Level of Service D E C F C D D Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 49.0 HCM Level of Service D iC7�/Ir\rolursae to Caacrtyzrfio 0 89 - x r Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.7 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection rapacity UiGlizatton9 6%0 aC11 Level of Service c Critical Lane Group ius \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_Analysis\NO_Build\R9-Main PMNB.sy6 Synchro 5.0 Page 1 .. VANASSLVL7-FF51 ion fi Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS A A E D Approach delay _ 37.5 29.2 (s/veh) D Approach LOS -- E -on RCS200d"4 Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i. ii t. RP Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information "" Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed T1 7/2004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build "" Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hospital Road """ Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (t rs): 0.25 R Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 590 10 15 700 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 5 662 17 75 721 5 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy ehicles, PH 0 V 0 -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 ` Minor Street Northbound I Southbound r. Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 G L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 25 0 25 5 0 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1:00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 ourly Flow Rate 33 0 33 6 0 6 w eh/h) oportion of heavy hicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%} 0 0 Flared approach N I N it r; Storage 0 0 kw RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Configuration LR LR „�„ Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound k Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 m Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LR Volume, v (vph) 5 15 66 12 i Capacity, cm (vph) 886 927 175 161 40 Jc ratio 0.01 0.02 0.38 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.05 1.62 0.24 was Control Delay(s/veh) 9.7 8.9 37.5 29.2 i iw i I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis No Build Conditions 3: Route 9 & North Maple Street Evening Peak Hour Nlo2me NO ,._. � ti3t3t� cE3 $E , 1alt�12 ttrB NE�q SBIi i Lane Configurations , Ideal FowvAt2 1900 1900 ._7900 s 1.900 1900 1900 1900 19Db '1900 'Ty 900 1900, .Y Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4.0 4.0 4-.0 .-.,:.'>�?:�•...z;,••l�.r?s._w.-.:,.r, ..r� _,,.,.. xs'z-=�.ci....x,.��3,-.,�J y._.-.>,_`.��C .r,.:*ate .--T.MU..�� _,� .. = *s.,.�.:- .°. Frt p 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95 SS �CV�.n. .s> J' 4„+e_" F.€' '°f -£yt Tk h -E.'�.^-.'�4KT E Satd. Flow (prot) 1818 1851 1737 1740 ~ ._ ti Ro.. ;486 .� � .g & BJ Satd. Flow (perm) 1566 1629 1543 1574 Rak-hour factor, PHF 0. 87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0-90 0.90 Lane Groupp, Flow (vph) 0 546 0 0 734 0 0 192 0 0 261 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2� 6 8 a Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 6.0 41.0 41.0 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 v/c Ratio Pla 1.06 0 26 0 34 - �.� Progression Factor 1.00 1:00 1..00_ 1.00 on .��z�^-,^`.� �iSS Delay(s) 32.8 77.0 13.8 14.9 �- WHIM ". g Approach Delay(s) 32.8 .- 3=77.0 13.8 1 . 1, F _a+M rives. I' � 1 HGM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 i ai 8 Sidi s>- K 0�' .� s Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.5% ICU Level of Service . F is i; i. \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity Analysis\No Build\R9-Maple PMNB.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 Two-Way Stop Control Pale 2 of 2 i Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 70.1 LOS A B :w Approach delay (s/veh) -- `- 10.1 Approach LOS -- -- 8 HCS2000T'",, Copyright©3003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I i� Z t h i E i k ow ionaw f L C t r i I i am Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 I , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LMC Intersection Elm Street at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build Analysis Time Period Mornin Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion I ! East/West Street: Elm Street North/South Street: Hospital Road E Intersection Orientation: East-West JStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ¢ l Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R i Volume (veh/h) 20 225 0 0 80 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 I l Hourly Flow Rate 21 244 0 0 97 54 (veh/h) F Proportion of heavy 2 ! D g vehicles, PHV Median type Undivided RT Channeiized? 0 0 po Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Sic 0 0 Im Minor Street Northbound Southbound k Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 i L T R L T R i Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 10 0 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 12 0 12 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy r 0 0 0 0 0 D ehicles, PHv Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound F Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph} 21 24 Capacity, cm (vph) 1430 725 /c ratio 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.70 Queue length (95%) i Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.7 13.6 LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) 13.6 Approach LOS -- -- B j HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Resm-coed Version 4.1d F f 6m kom I i r f IMw nw impN k L ON imp Two-Tay Stop Control Page 1 of 2 f i i f TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information I Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Woodlawn venue FN Agency/Go. VHB. Inc. Date Performed 2117 12004 urisdiction MHD D2 Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour nalysis Year 2010 No Build s go Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion i East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Woodlawn Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 t F RM L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 170 755 0 0 385 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 170 755 0 0 385 20 Proportion of heavy ehicles, P 4 -- -- 0 -- -- xv 6 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal I 1 0 0 a Minor Street Northbound Southbound T Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 70 !P Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 5 0 70 1 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 5 0 5 vehicles, PHv R Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 PP Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service OF Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 170 75 Capacity, cm (vph) 1143 494 1c ratio 0.15 0.15 Queue length (95%) 0.52 0.53 t'; Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 f LOS A E E j Approach delay 40.7 (s/veh) Approach LOS - -- E RCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d E s lew i t 0 6 k 6 k 6 S c C N r4 k G Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 t i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information i Analyst LfV?C intersection IRoute 9 at Elm Street Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD.D2 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour i ear Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion E East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Eirn Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound k Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R F Volume (veh/h) 0 580 15 155 300 0 k t Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.86 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 666 17 180 348 0 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 4 -- Median type Undivided t RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T t r: Upstream Signal 0 0 d Minor Street Northbound Southbound r Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r Volume veh/h) 10 0 345 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1:00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 10 0 370 0 0 0 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy 5 0 5 0 0 0 vehicles, PHV F Percent grade (%) 0 0 [Lanes lared approach N N } Storage 0 0 T Channelized? 0 0 'f 1 0 1 0 D 0 r Configuration L R Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound j Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 .11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v(vph) 180 10 370 Capacity, cm (vph) 901 125 449 /c ratio 0.20 0.08 0.82 Queue length (95%) 0.74 0.26 7.83 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.0 36.3 40.8 v Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 8.9 12.6 LOS A A e j pproach delay 12.6 (s/veh) pproach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyri.ght O 2003 University of Florida,All Riehts Reserved Version 4.1 d ! m 3 i r i 1 L imma I'I a iwt G f files IIC� \T�nrnmPntcQl �nanrlol7(1Catiin rc\7racrPlli\T nralQ/7nCPrtinnclTPmn1n71( tmn ;11 ni')nnA M i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I General Information Site Information I nalyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Denniston Place gency/Co. VHB, Inc. k4 Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2,11712004 lAnalysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour nalysis Year 010 No Build i Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Denniston Place Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 l F Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ! Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 390 645 0 20 280 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 390 645 0 26 373 0 (veh/h) to Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 -- -- 0 -- — Median type Undivided Pill RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 . 0 1 0 P Configuration L TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I r L T R L T R I: Volume(vehih) 0 0 5 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pill Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 5 0 0 0 ' (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 y Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N F Storage 0 0 ; ON RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound F r Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lade Configuration L LT Ln Volume, v(vph) 390 26 5 III Capacity, cm (vph) 1197 950 I 476 /c ratio 0.33 0.03 0.01 Queue length (95%) 1.43 0.08 0.03 film/1C'•\T�nrnmantc�7(lanrlo/7n<`attincre\lractall;\T nr-a1�7 7nCattnrrc\Tamr\n')lr(` tmr ;n ninnnA I� HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis No Build Conditions I 3:Route 9&Prospect Street Morning Peak Hour -. -- ^_ L �._..6WL Lane Configurations ._�* _ fdeaFFlow(Y,phP7) :'::'1900. 1900,190D190D�^190© ,1900-P.79D0 :7800 19Q0-:''1900_ 1900 1900 -19D0 3BOD>7900 1900_ ;is -� Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LaneUtil F.actdr .. - 0:95 °:1 D0'� 95>�r _..' =1.00 1 00;=.':1{YO- }00 0.99 IM OM 1.00 085 1.00 0.85 1 AO 0 6s 0.85 Flt:Pralected � •- '- 1:OQ .. _,-r`09g 7,06.x.,,a_ ,.:e: ,.,,'0;95 100:` 0°5 100 ..,.� A.°o Satd.Flow(prot) 3520 1719 3395 1752 1566 1 1563 1805 1615 1615 _ FIiPermified,' "+�u-.•.x, .... .A=Qa .,- J}9o.� 1300 .. a,. -, 26 t00.:-vpo5¢ tu:011. �0:95 tOD 100. .., _ ilw, Satd.Flow(perm) 3357 1719 3395 475 1568 1770 1583 1805 1615 1615 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.96 0-96 0.96 0-80 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.75 0-75 0,96 0.96 0-96 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 -22.. •..,,_a`z=:r'"e'..�--i._l._n... .��i.':` I Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 901 0 50 Soo 0 0 40 67 146 83 0 0 67 176 22 FJeavtR9fi11-fes_°/).aE�.x_ �".:2°7:s... . '?z.: c2 � - 3?7u._ ,",,-3-17E,„°",.3 .O9,h. rOf,.<..p°ro".. "Ms-_ Tum Type Perry Prot Perm Perm Prot Split Perm Perm PrP�we3P�2se?.�.t�-�,.•,. :.��....��.-..:<2 .-+�.,al._1,�,.:.`*. ',6; `sa'�'"'-' -"M`'�' _z8�.„,iim�..� '� }�--� - ,..�Pteci .�,,.=�'.w-"r�`.iw.:•�+-4--,��.: .3;�.L.�...�;..� �.,c�.,:ca,..w Permined Phases 2 4 4 8 7 7 i a- _,.� Effective Green,g(s) 38.0 4.1 46.1 13.0 13 0 12.4 12 4 15.4 15.4 15.4 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 I '- Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1240 68 1521 60 198 213 191 270 242 242 v/s Ratio Perm c0 27 s. MOB 0.04 0.05 c0 11 0.01 !11141 gr-""'s ". «' Uniform Delay,dl 28.0 48.9 17.2 42.9 41.0 43.4 42.0 39.1 41.7 37.7 .�..sa."��.` �5-0 ,� '�a'�f� 'lo..�,°-��' �. ,` .Dy�"�� -�. _ ..• Incremental Delay,d2 2.2 33.4 0.1 24.5 1'0 B.8 1.6 1).7 16.4 0.2 level of Service _ C F B E D D D _D D D _ ..mc..,....�.la"�°�°�+='�i.'''tt`" -3D��._�,ai,`.�.��-..�� »x '.✓�,.�.�-1�-03�� ..s;-.x,,,�-�.-. ;'.��4..�. .ssm� `._`'� ,'��'-�.�-�'.%N'_+ .. ��- 1 Aooroach LOS C C D D D I HCM�aAFSverage Control Delay 35.6 HCM Level of Service D } Actuated Cycle Length(s) 102 9 Sum of lost tirr>r(s) 0.0 7.@ M.,fe�ectiorrv" u��l��:a ..- .�,.�-.4+��,r;"•��.. �,Va:el fS--+'�"�-: � >=�.�,_ �':��'�,� �" .�-:�3` = e: '� a, �_'."�r�' ��.. _.. >x �,Y«�.. c Cnfical Lane Group l ) f OM p !ti f I ii x111141 r I'. n� ttk r N N Vvnawald�,-heckin\08855Ue ch,,Capacity_Analysis\No_BuilelR9-Main MONS.sy6 Syndhro 5 Reporl VANASSLVL7-FF51 Two-Way Stop Control Pale 2 of 2 LOS A B E D Approach delay 38.2 26.8 (s/vah) Approach LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4 1 d Crt f. OR Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst ILMC Intersection Route 9 at Hospital Road gency/Co. VHB, Inc, Jurisdiction MHD D2 I Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2010 No Build nalysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 t Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments i Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Y L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 850 25 25 390 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate 5 934 27 26 419 5 (veh/h) w Proportion of heavy rvehicies, PHv 2 -- -- 4 — -- u Median type Undivided G iYwr RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR h Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R. Volume (veh/h) 15 0 10 5 0 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 20 0 13 6 0 6 Proportion of heavy 4 vehicles, PHv D 4 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach /v i N Storage 0 0 FT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0. (; Configuration LR LR s. Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ** Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LR Volume, v(vph) 5 26 33 12 Capacity, cm (vph) 1135 708 141 177 /c ratio 0.00 0.04 0.23 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.11 0.86 0.22 �a Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 10.3 38.2 26.8 a I i Aw HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis No Build Conditions 3: Route 9 & North Maple Street Morning Peak Hour ` fc??MtiBE 1BT N3:R� :SBL ,S:B� ._.SB.Ft Lane Configurations 4 _ r_ OR f deal F�ovu�vpl�p eta X190©� 190 19nD:r�1900Tt 190 1900 1900 19D0 19D0 7 900 _�9;00 �,190Q Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 x,13 X00 , jK-...v.y.-curs...= �i31y4I .rY ":5" "F•+m...ms'�Y .3- ,:._-• Frt _ 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.97 n I FFPrateete 0 a�.,, 0 ME Satd Flow (prot) 1805 1711 1659 1733 1 _ _., a e , �tted n Satd Flow (perm) 1658 1369 1575 1477 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.79 0 79 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.82 i Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 851 0 0 431 0 0 188 0 0 195 0 $"a1/ fl�'� >�. � � '€. � 'v�p O/� yX�a�� 6.✓.� ^" ('j;o�' o'�,...,,. o a Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm �' 1?•r a ss � �,; � _ . � �-..�--°".�" Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Effective Green, g (s) o0 0 36.0 41.0 41 0 u e • Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio 1.21 0.74 0.25 0.27 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 Delay(s) 132 9 _ 9.0 13.7 14.1 PUMP °' WE Approach Delay(s) ~132.9 29.0 13.7 14.1 f y}N �� y+ ..y �i'ifW'yn� •-C..:a �°'-^i�+ie+at3� ..��'� � Y�p�L'�iy'S./ I �V - .�_..�Fr. rc�e+w ,.. a�''.-M(`.. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 .�. '$: �- •.'m!:6n.851 �a<�fll'®f-D t �e'� ��ra� ,�-r r •. Intersection Capacity Ut�lizafion 103 8% !CU Level of Service F �._. •,U. A "�"E;�iHIE' ;�-Y4."�...Nn'Y..x"�a..kydnr:-1 _ 1ec$.!Y-.{:--E '��. r i' lO RM \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity Analysis\No Build\R9-Maple AMNB.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 am Two-Way Stop Control Pale 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 11.9 i LOS A B ,,, Approach delay (s/veh) 11'9 Appraach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright e 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Rserved Version 4.1d i t s f E n F f �t t C t' C u P i E hm l: Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 f i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY } General Information Site Information Elm. Street at Hospital 4 Analyst LMC Intersection Road j Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 f Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour { t Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Elm Street North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 f Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 20 175 0 0 185 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate 22 201 0 0 225 24 (veh/fh) Proportion of heavy F vehicles, PHV ! 2 0 Median type Undivided - R E RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR z Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 d 11 12 7 L T R L T R k R. Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 45 0 25 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 57 0 32 veh/h) Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 1 0 1 vehicles, PHV k Percent grade N o 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 K RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR 'Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 22 89 Capacity, cm (vph) 1317 609 P" /c ratio 0.02 0.15 0.51 Queue length (95%) 0.05 Two--Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 16.7 LOS A C Approach delay (s/veh) -" '" 16.7 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS2000TM Copyright m 2003 University of Florida,All Riahts Reserved Version 4.1d r 6. s p 4 i R L F f } k i Iw aws i k C E Aw i Y Two-Walt Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 p TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information nalyst LMC Intersection Route 9 of Woodlawn j Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Avenue f urisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 nalysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion ! East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Woodlawn Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound l t Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 110 560 0 0 460 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate 6 (veh/h) 137 699 0 0 522 22 t iProportion of heavy I po tvehicles, P v 0 -- ! -- Median type II Undivided RT Channeiized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 c Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 175 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 5 0 194 E (veh/h) Proportion of heavy r vehicles, PHV 0 D 0 0 0 0 Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WS Northbound Southbound ` r Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR volume,v (vph) 137 199 Capacity, cm (vph) 1020 504 /c ratio 0.13 0.39 1.87 Queue length (95%) 0.46 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 I sOS B F C pproach delay 20.4/veh) pproach LOS -- -- c 1 HCS2000T" Copyrigbt©3003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 41d i l i s k �III�1 5 an aim ;I Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 2 i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst LMC Intersection IRoute 9 at Elm Street gency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction JMHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 004 4 Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Elm Street j Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0,25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R I Volume (veh/h) 0 435 25 305 330 0 l Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 1.00 t Hourly Flow Rate 0 543 31 346 375 0 E (veh/h) r Proportion of heavy vehicles, P,, 0 ! "" i 3 "- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 foiume inor Street Northbound Southbound po ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R (veh/h) 15 0 235 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 15 0 250 0 D 0 I Proportion of heavy R ehicles, PHV 1 D 1 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 c Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R. I ' t Controt Delay, Queue Length, Lever of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound JIM Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Rp Volume, v (vph) 346 15 250' Capacity, cm (vph) 994 74 531 /c ratio 0.35 0.20 0.47 Queue length (95%) 1.57 0.70 2.49 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 65.6 17.7 ti i� pproach delay (s/veh) -- — 18.6 j pproach LOS -- -- C I Hcs2oodm Copyright 2005 U--4v--�sity of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d imp { I 6 r !tam, E e pw e 'v ;III E E k nn& M f F E fft G t F A is t P "r. u WR h r t Y P. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t General Information Site Information Analyst LMC intersection Roure 9 at Denniston P/ace Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 i Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period Evening Peak Hour { Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion i East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Denniston Place Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 4 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 R L T R L T R ; Volume (veh/h) 290 415 0 5 350 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 290 415 0 _ 6 466 0 Proportion of heavy -vehicles, PHV 0 0 Median type Undivided s ) RT Channelized? 0 0 i Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LT a Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound P" Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R G Volume veh/h) 5 0 15 0 0 0 _ Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate_(veh/h) 6 0 20 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N pR Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ pa Configuration LR r, Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LR Volume,v(vph) 290 6 26 Capacity, cm (vph) 1106 1155 291 /c ratio 0.26 0.01 0.09 Queue length (95 0/.) 1.06 0.02 0.29 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.4 8.1 18.6 LOS A A C P .W. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Evening Peak Hour L 3:Route 9&ProsDect Street Existing Conditions Moetnent= -Y _;TEBL �$Fi._ 1M8L �WB .yJ8N8f2 _TIBL_TIBfi2'_i DEL �E "_.SER2.54 L2'"SWG'SWR StNH2 s' x-^"a j Lane Configurations 431 *t ?A ?1 K �► j ��_._ Ideal�low(ypyyl -,� .=1900 -_i90Q, 1906"I900�_1900 790D-'190D;,='1900 1900;` Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4ane.tlti7,Fa-a(x " 49g _ _. <100 OQ 'rrt 0-99 1.00 4.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 _ F(fP.tofected' .:.; _ '1':.QO, ,.�:, ➢95 -L00' __-'.,_ ;4:95 1-OOi 0,95 -J 90_ ?095 1 -Ito O.i.: Satd.flow(prof) 3515 1787 3510 7805 1615 1736 1553 1805 1615 1615 F11=Pemrtler�<� r-..�-° � D:9?i �`P-,¢95` �100„1, .�;�"z,,,,,,z_'f125 "1;➢0:° 095,"100.. ,_•- .�_ �-0_9�1�DOr T00 �"' .... ,,... ,„. , Said.Flow(perm) 9299 1787 3510 477 1615 1736 1553 1805 1615 1615 Peak-hourlactor,PHF _0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 I.OD 0-82 0-62 0.82 0-75 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 s �rl'�3nws�P„� �:.'�/' ;,5.7�r�.v 5'2��.a.3?1 .-3;.333,��.�9 W�i.,6��'�4.u.fr',�„0�°'27 13�;�"12•..z:::: �'30 .325a. �4�`-Y, a..�.�s:�,� ...:L-��-...;: Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 612 0 11 378 0 0 97 134 100 40 0 0 42 325 42 Neew�.eh'ra ?2°�. .. 27�,:r��7=:,6 .��",`" R�e"?v�,,>a�-, .aD�,'rr��_4-�°�.;as.�r�A.Jo'_`:,,o.�i-__to?��.3x0°:o"�.A9✓�,`."�.,:a t4� s -�.'..^,.., = x Tum Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Prot Split Perm Perm Permitted Phases 2 4 4 8 7 7 i Effective Green,g(s) 222 1.2 27.4 19.6 19 6 9 8 9.8 20.7 20.7 20.7 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 k 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 &0 F Lane Grp Cap(vph) 783 23 1029 100 339 182 163 400 358 358 v. Ti.PLO +.. .:•„R-: r. ""_07-.,.a,--cA::`>C- "°�` °.- -- °•t`�p - - sue."`+' .'w�` °'. p.s; Ws Ratio Penn c0.19 c0.20 0.08 0.03 c02 1 0.03 M1 Uniform Delay,d1 314 45.8 26.2 36.7 31.8 39.8 38 p 29.0 35.5 291 t Incremental Delay,d2 5.1 14.8 0-2 79.3 0.8 3.4 0.8 0.1 25.7 0"1 D..��S'.5 Level of Service D E C r C D D C E C Approach LOS D C _ D D k ^.�-��'.�-��';��•�.- �HHCccM Average Control Delay 43.8 HCM Level o`Service D h Jim Actuated Cycle Length(s) 915 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0. 1,�,'f i�e`�D�~C��if'.'�11Za,..a��•aicf� .,�`:�:-�=r�m�'.`�'�.�'1MY .+..�,�,..3,� �-:'��: ��.' .��m �.i1:,,.,5�i+_:`'qy-�*�.:5�. -.,^e�:'. ��.,.'..��`A3�'�a='�'.,r�rY_�`� +--..ec� Y c Critical Lane Group t P }[[S} 1EE 4' t c G P. G� li 1 ( tl4M f s i' so 1lmawald\checkin108855\tech\Capacity_An2lysi8\Existing\R9-Main PMEX sy6 S_vnchro 5 Report I �rnninCC1 VI 7_7F:;1 f S W Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 Pm LOS A A D C LA Approach delay 27.0 22.8 sIveh OR Approach delay Epproach LOS D C PM HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.)d 1p kP iif kL F. Pm .V ji Pa Pm Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection Route 9 at Hospital Road i Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period _Evening Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period 'hrs): 0.25 i Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R r. Volume (veh/h) 5 525 10 15 585 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly Flow Rate 5 589 11 15 603 5 I (veh/h) Proportion of heavy _ 0 Evehicles, PHV 0 ` N Median type Undivided RT Channelized? D 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 +. L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 25 0 25 5 0 5 r Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 1.00 0.75. 1 0.75 1.00 0.75 Hourly Flow Rate w® (veh/h) 33 0 33 6 0 6 Proportion of heavy C 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHV imp Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach H N Storage 0 0 '"' RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LR Volume, v (vph) 5 15 66 12 Capacity, cm (vph) 980 987 229 214 /c ratio 0.01 0.02 0.29 0.06 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.05 1.15 0.18 w� Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 8.7 27.0 22.8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions 3: Route 9 & North Maple Street Evening Peak Hour C3 ? to % M RM, W ��Sf-3 SB '7-- V, V MX R 9a 7 AMU, MAO Lane Configurations 4, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94 ........... I Satd. Flow(prot) 1815 1847 1738 1740 Satcl. Flow (perm) 1608 1651 1541 1587 ry M 4� ai., Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 JIM ORM as 1- - L Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 489 0 0 609 0 0 180 01 0 245 aQ ON FUTIF W_NOW�17_c 1 i Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm I W-ME I MW MEN Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 & PIN Effective Green,.g (s) 36.0 36.0 41 0 MW Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ws Ratio Prot MAOMONWIMR,IMMI-M.-�_QM_F4 RX vJc Ratio 0.72 0.87 0.24 0.32 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wG ZIM F'M Z ,M WOM Delay(s) 26.7 36.4 13.7 14.6 AW ,MWMF�- II W Approach Delay(s) 26.7 36.4 13.7 14.6 1: lill! Mil P aw- A-321RIN g Zk AlIlW MEWM 13 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 MIR MEMB-z- R E41- 1-1 Mae ,MM_M UNIM.- M�30 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.3% ICU Level of Service E "M \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity AnaIysis\Existirg\R9-Maple PMEX.syS Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 .,. Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 L Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 70.0 LOS A B Approach delay _ 10.0 (s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- 8 HCP_000TM Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d il lipP s 3 wit Y u is +Iw r 1�! w RPM Two-Way Stop Control Pale 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst LMC Intersection Elm Street at Hospital k gency/Co. VHB, Inc. Road Date Performed 2117 12004 urisdiction MND D2 Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour nalysis Year 2004 Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West.Street: Elm Street No th;South Street: .Hospital Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments E Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 20 210 0 0 75 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 21 228 Q 0 91 54 Proportion of heavy WR ehicles, PHA 2 ! 0 — € Median type Undivided RT Channeiized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound F Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 r L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 10 0 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate 0 0 0 12 0 12 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy i` vehicles, PHV 0 0 0 D 0 D { Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 21 24 Capacity, cm (vph) 1437 740 /c ratio 0,01 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.04 0.10 Two-Way Stop Control Pa-t 2 of 2 i R Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 12.6 LOS A B ,, Approach delay (s/veh) -- '- 72.6 Approach LOS -- -- B HCS2000TM Copyright®2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d low t w r r _ r �w K i� 'r: i� ill! 4 #R t S i� V Two-Way Stop Control Pag,c 1 c 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i General Information Site Information j nalyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Woodlawn Avenue Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD 02 Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion EastlWest Street: Route 9 North/South Street: W.oodlawn Avenue g Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 °"M L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 160 645 0 0 340 20 E our factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 160 645 0 0 340 20 I Proportion of heavy _ vehicles, PHV 4 Median type Undivided f RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 i Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Y Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 65 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 D 65 ! Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 5 0 5 ehicles, PHV I i I t— I Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N s Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WI3 Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v(vph) 160 70 Capacity, cm (vph) 1188 546 1c ratio 0.13 0-13 Queue length (95%) 0.47 0.44 Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS A D C Approach delay (slveh) -- -- 24.4 i" pproach LOS -- -- C HCS200OTM Copyright C 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i i i im r i I s i E X !IA! t L E h. is L r r: I'w P 4 6m f Am Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information r Analyst LMC Intersection Route 9 at Elm Street j Agency/Co. VHB, Inc. Jurisdiction MHD D2 ! Date Performed 2/1712004 Analysis Year 2004 Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour k taw Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Elm Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period(hrs): 0.25 E Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments f Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 475 15 145 260 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.86 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 0 545 17 168 302 0 ` (veh/h) Proportion of heavy t ehicles, PHV 0 -- 4 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 E Configuration I TR L T Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I L T R L T R c E Volume (veh/h) 10 0 325 0 0 0 x Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 10 D 349 0 0 0 (veh/h) F Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 5 0 5 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N ^J Storage 0 0 J RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R k Y Control Delay, Queue Length, LeveI of Service Approach EB WS Northbound Southbound P8 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 168 10 349 Capacity, cm (vph) 999 170 526 /c ratio 0.17 0.06 0.66 Queue length (95%) 0.60 0.79 4.85 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 27.5 24.3 i i Approach delay(slveh) -- 11.6 Approach LOS -- — B Hcn000m Copyright©2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i i !1114 t f 1 I fF t f 4 i 4 kro t 111111 i, i C i' 4 p E G t. r i /R r. 1s1 ww ■111 I i ! i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information i Analyst !LMO Intersection lRoute 9 at Dennisto;,�Place ! Agency/Co. iVHB, Inc. Jurisdiction IMHD D2 C ! Date Performed 211712004 Analysis Year 004 i Analysis Time Period Morning Peak Hour i "R Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Denniston Place Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 i Im F Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments E Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R I Volume (veh/h) 370 535 0 20 245 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 370 535 0 26 326 1 0 Proportion of heavy S vehicles, PHV 0 __ -- 0 -- -- i Median type I Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 , Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 ; Configuration L TR LT Upstream Signal___ 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 r L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 5 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 A Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 5 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy ehicies, P 0 0 0 D 0 0 l Hv N: Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service t Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LR Volume, v(vph) 370 26 5 Capacity, cm (vph) 1245 1043 549 /c ratio 0.30 0.02 0.01 Queue length (95%) 1,25 0.08 0.03 IIIR Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 8.5 11.6 . LOS A A B 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Morning Peak Hour 3: Route 9& Prospect Street Existing Conditions Lane Configurations Ce a«our� phF[j r,7:900 •„i900 v_ l9D0:-�1�JDIJ;-1�D0 .1900,_ 7900, 19Q0 7300_ 7900 ;;i900 19ULL ,1_9D0 . 190,0 1900' 500' Total Lost time(s) 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4-0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4-0 Frt 0.99 1.01) 0.99 1.00 0.85 1 00 0.85 1.00 M5 0.85 IF PEW 1400 1 OQ f Satd.Flow(prot) ym 3517 1719 3388 1752 1568 1770 1583 1805 7615 1615 95 `. 05 +1a` aR« 0.•2 _ 1 04� 0 9 �Q = 0 45_r 00 r 1 0 Satd,Flow(perm) 3354 1719 3388 483 1568 1770 1583 1805 1615 1615 i Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.96 0.96 0-96 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.75 075 0.95 0-96-96 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 E Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 776 0 50 256 0 0 40 67 135 83, 0 0 87 165 22 fly Turn Type -Perm Prot Perm Perm Prot Split Perm Perm F L Permitted ��..1w; -�`� Permitted Phases 2 4 4 8 7 7 at_e�l'�ceert ':�.� � 7'8��...- �0 •�4_,�'�.�„',. a. ;`fy-�"':�T•��5 33 b' 4�� ` 1�`,r a�'. Y• G - •.� mss,:: _s :.� -t-nx"h�src�9t�. ` .,�....-;..n., _d.�_�'�-T�.a...�,.. s. -,.; �.. - ` ,. aw �Effective Green,g(s) 38.8 4.0 46.8 12.8 12.8 11.6 11.6 12.9 12.9 12.9 € ^` ' Clearance Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5-0 2 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1300 69 1584 62 201 205 183 233 208 208 tw "�7 .'." ,.�- ?s..,,.»�., -�.'.•„ca��`'�s}z 0��" �`�� P v/s Ratio Perm c 23 c0.08 0.04 0.05 c0.10 0.01 •�'r,.��„=-', �..� ��1 X7,.2 x�..,z,�.:t .W.:�.,. ` �.'£5� �3��--.�:� b`� �`� '-a .�.�. �.. � Uniform Delay,d1 24.4 47 5 15.4 41.5 39-8 4L4 41,3 39.9 42.3 38.5 } 1 t� `_ � s=aE!r7 f39� Q OQ' °p6 r Incremental Delay,d2 0-7 31.2 0,0 20.7 1.0 7.4 1.8 1.0 18.5 0.2 f Eu 67`} Z Level of Service C E B E D D D D E D Approach LDS C C D D D r � � HCM Average Control Delay 34.1 HCM Level of Serve C « Actuated Cycle Length(s) 100.1 Sum of lost time(s) 20.0 c Critical Lane Group �i 4 I. IFI f i L i Vmawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity_AnalysislExisting\R9-Main AMEX.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 > i Two-Way Stop Control Paoe 2 of 2 LOS A A D C Approach delay (s/veh) 28.5 21.4 Approachl.-Os D C HCE2000T"*" Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Vcrsi on 4.1d F. Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY , General information Site Information Analyst Intersection Route 9 at Hospital Road Agency/Co. VHB, Inc, Jurisdiction MHD D2 Date Performed 2117 12004 Analysis Year 2004 �* Analysis Time Period IMomingPeak Hour I Project Description CDH Hospital Expansion East/West Street: Route 9 North/South Street: Hospital Road ■� ntersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement ] 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 730 25 25 345 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate 5 802 27 26 370 5 (veh/h) 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 -- -- 4 — -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 15 0 10 5 0 5 -- . Peak-hour factor, PHF 01 75 3.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.75 r Hourly Flow Rate 20 0 13 6 0 6 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy }; vehicles, PHV 4 0 4 0 0 0 tw Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR , Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LR LR Volume, v (vph) 5 26 33 12 Capacity, cm (vph) 1183 794 186 231 ion /c ratio 0.00 0.03 0.18 0.05 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.10 0.63 0.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 9.7 28.5 21.4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions g P tY 3' Route 9 & North Maple Street Morning Peak Hour �a1 �R r� L n� l�lB s 8esBR Lane Configurations +4 -__. 4 IcJI FYCV�J�1 X90 90D 19D0�196D90t3 %7900_ 19001904 �19OD y1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 .4.0 F - Frt 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.96 i w - Satd. Flow (prof) 180�1j 1707 1658 1729 K. :cti Satd. Flow (perm) 1679 1405 1572 1492 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.82 i Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 724 0 0 373 0 0 176 0 0 183 0 I'm Turn Type Perm Perm` rK Perm Perm x x= i=• _ _�f�_ _. =. X __ w`- __ F Permitted Phases c 6 8 4 Effective Green, g (s) 30 0 36.0 41.0 41.0 Clearance Time (s) 5 0 5 0 5.0 5 0 P v/s Ratio Prot , 7: ,~1 A 02 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.63 023 5 Progression Factor 1 00 i.00 1.00 1.00 CIS-r. w .. G,c •. r Delay(s) 62 9 24.2 13.5 13.8 I Approach Delay(s) 62.9 24.2 13.5 13.8 G. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92 7% ICU Level of Service E L MR \\mawald\checkin\08855\tech\Capacity Analysis\Existing\R9-Maple AMEX.sy6 Synchro 5 Report VANASSLVL7-FF51 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 0-4 Capacity Analyses • 2004 Existing • 2010 No Build • 2010 Build Mp f. PO OR ComPutations Project: Project# Location: Sheet Of Calculated by: Date: Checked by: Date: Title mct 1z ,ao 2C B3 B180 (n -�Yga s5-) A Jt P-d c (i,-L 6) 35 S� ;1A kv it 145�*rt 2-5 mk9r.iorms.humanres.computatom.pmA 1,'anasse Hangen Brustfin,Inc. vmVanasse Hangen Bmstlin,Inc. Trip Generation r. L jl COLLISION DIAGRAM INTERSECTION. 7, PERIOD FROM TO MUNICIPAL!TY r. p REPARED BY- JOB NUMBER.. 0. 2 -DATE PREPARED p NORTH ARROW TL x, PAVEMENTA TYPES OF COLLISION ACCIDENT SUMMARY PAVEMENTA D DRY REAR END C CLEAR DAYLIGHT NIGHT TOTALS M W WET HEAD ON PROP '.'Xm R TYPE FATAL INJURY DAM, FATAL INJURY PROP. R RAIN SIDE SWIPE FATAL INJURY PROP.0.' DAMP_ TOTAL F FOGGY 8 SNOWY,ICY OUT OF CONTROL RIGHTANGLE 0 0 0 OTHER LEFT TURN REAR-END DL DAYLIGHT N DARK-No LIGHTS RIGHT ANGLE L DARK-LIGHTED HEAD-ON SYMBOLS LEFT TURN SIDESWIPE MOVING VEHICLE ❑ FIXED OBJECT FIXED OBJECT BACKING VEHICLE • FATAL ACCIDENT PEDESTRIAN 0 INJURY ACCIDENT PARKED CAR PARKED VEHICLE OTHER Iwo TOTAL COLLISION DIAGRAM vm INTERSECTIO N � PERIOD- FROM TO MUNWALITY _PREPARED BY JOB NUMBER-f-' DATE PREPARED ILI 1 16 NORTH ARROW �jl fi ----___. � � ,�Ids / � yII r PAVEMENT/WEATHER/LIGHTNING TYPES OF COLLISION ACCIDENT SUMMARY D DRY REAR END t C CLEAR HEAD ON DAYLIGHT NIGHT TOTALS PROP. W WET PROP. '20 R RAIN SIDE SWIPE TYPE FATAL INJURY DAM. FATAL INJURY DAM. FATAL INJURY A,,p TOTAL F FOGGY OUT OF CONTROL RIGHT ANGLE S SNOWY,ICY 0 OTHER �-LEFTTURN REAR-END DL DAYLIGHT RIGHT ANGLE IN DARK-NO LIGHTS HEAD-ON L DARK-LIGHTED SYMBOLS LEFT TURN SIDESWIPE MOVING VEHICLE 0 FIXED OBJECT "FIXED OBJECT BACKING VEHICLE • FATAL ACCIDENT ----PEDESTRIAN 0 INJURY ACCIDENT PARKED CAR PARKED VEHICLE IOTHER TOTAL � �- __.___.-_-_.�_.__...._._�:..___.._�_.___..__�_.._n_� Vanasse Hangen Brusthn,Inc. Crash Diagrams F. f. II N'S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 L EM Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 I Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 1 ---- ------ Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East From West_ ! _Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru__ __ !R t App.Total Left Thru ,' App.Total Int.Total so Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45- Peak 1 of 1 —-- Intersection 16.00 Volume 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 .5 5 7 Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 00 0.0 100 0 1615 Volume 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 I 5 Peak Factor j 0.350 High ht 1615 1600 16:15 Volume 1 0 0 4 4 Peak Factor 0.250; 0.250 ! 0.312 osp a o Out In Total .01 -1 --- 11 I I Imm 0i 11 Right Left 1 I I i I Io iol North _ ol I s m E ' � 2/1 V2004 4:00:00 PM ; I I 15-3 X111/20044:45:00 PM !Trucks ) j v:— I 7 li t r i Ow t t I 1' C ( e K t I fi _w tiMlfS Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 W Street Elm.Street p78-664-2565 Site Code :88550005 rty/State : Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 ! Page No 1 Weather : Cloudy : I !I Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St -- I _ From North _ _ From East From West _ i Start-ime Left Right App Total Thru Right App Total Left Thru App.Total ! Int.Total "ak Hour From 16:D0 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 1600 Volume 42 26 68 179 20 199 : 19 167 1861 453 j Percent 61.8 382 89.9 10.1 10.2 89.8 P" 16:30 Volume 10 8 18 46 1 47 5 50 55 120 ! Peak Factor 0.944 High Int.. 1600 16:00 : 16:30 Volume 14 8 22 48 12 60 5 50 55 Peak Factor 0.773 0.829 0 845 f Pw Hospital Out In Total 391 68 r 107' i OR zs 43) t Rigl-t Left I p@ 4 r: k 4 iv 1O IMoim: D �= North x rn k 2%11/20544'00:00 PM w �;I? 2/1112004445:00 PM t Oic°v` aio PIN oim ml G Y _ p li F r l I i 4 r t' a F N/S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name :88550005 +� E/W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :211112004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 r� Hospital Rd Elm Si— Elm St From North From East From West _ _ Start Time Left Right App Total Thru_ Right App.Total Left Thru : App.Total I Int.Total II Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45- Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 43 26 69 180 20 200 19 172 191 ! 460 Percent 62.3 37.7 90.0 10.0 9.9 90.1 16:00 Volume 14 8 22 49 12 61 4 34 36 121 Peak Factor i 0.950 High Int 16:00 16:00 16:30 i e Volume 14 8 22 49 12 61 5 50 55 i Peak Factor 0.784 0.820 0.868 I Hospial Ra Out In Total 39, 691 ( 108' i i 1 X261 43i 1 Rignt Left I g i I E owl IN o m North E J &1772-064- 1 720644i00:00PM T I� Iojg3 I W 711 112 0 0 4 4:45'00 IM Kars 01"' (Trucks f hio lipsr 1 P. ii 'S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name :88550005 =! W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550005 ty/State Northampton: NA Start Date :2/1112004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 PIP Groups Printed-Trucks_ Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St i From North From East From West } Start Time Left Pight Th_ru Righi Left' Thru _ _ Int.Total i 16:00 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 16:15 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 !! 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.45 0 0 I 0 0 0 0? 0 Total 1 D 0 0 5 — 7 I 17:00 0 0 0 0 , 0 1 1 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1730 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 17:45 0 01 D Oj 0 1 � 1 Total 0 - _D i -- - -- 0 0 - 4 --- —- `-4 € Grand Total 1 O 1 1 0 : 0 9 I 11 Apprch% 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0' 0.0 100.0' E P" Total% 9.1 0.0' 9.1 0 0 0.0 81.8, Hospital Rd Elm St a Elm St � From North i _ From East _ _— From West Start Time Leh Right App Total Thru Right App.Total Left Tnr_u __�,pp Total I Int.Total ', ak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:.00 I Volume 1 0 1 1 0 1 f 0 5 5 1 7 AAA Percent 100.0 0.0 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 16:15 Volume 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 ( 0 4 4 I 5 - Peak Factor 0.350 High Int. 16:15 16:00 1 16:15 Volume 1 0 1 I 1 0 1 0 4 4 Peak Factor 0.250 0.250 ; 0.312 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 16:00 16:D0 16:00 F PF Volume 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 5 Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 High Int. 16:15 i 16:00 16:15 Volume 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 4 4 E Peak Factor 0.250 f 0.250 0.312 !1 Pw t i F f, Y t. I+ Y p I Y k Y. N/S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 E/W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 City/State Northampton; MA Start Date 2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars_ Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East From West Start Time Left Right: Thru Right Left Thr Int.Total 16 00 14 8 - - 48-- -12 4 33_ 119 16:15 12 6 42 4 7 43 ! 114 16:30 10 8 46 1 5 50 120 16:45 6 4 . 43 3 - 3 41 ! 100 p Total 42 26' — 179 20 19 — 167 453 17:00 11 5 32 1 1 41 91 17:15 5 1 66 3 2 39 I 116 17:30 9 2 35 1 2 22 1 71 17:45 5 0 i 48 0 : 1 36: 90 Total 30 - 8 - 181 5 6 1381 _-368 Grand Total 72 34 350 25 l 25 305 821 Apprch% 67.9 32.1 93.5 6.5 76 92.4 ! 6m Total% 8.8 41 1 43.8 3.0 3.0 37.1 'I Hospital Rd Elm St From North _ From East j From West Start Time Left Right! App.Total �_ Thru , _Right f App.Total Left Thru 1 App_Total —Int.Total ! Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 l Intersection 16:00 l Volume 42 26 68 179 20 199 19 167 186 I 453 t Percent 61.8 38.2 I 89.9 10.1 10.2 89.8 imp 16:30 Volume 10 8 18 ! 46 1 47 5 50 55 120 Peak Factor 0.944 High Int. 16:00 l 16:00 16:30 t Volume 14 8 221 48 12 60 j 5 50 55 lm Peak Factor 0.773 : 0.829 ! 0.845, Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 16:00 i 16:00 j 16:15 Volume 42 26 68< 179 20 199 j 16 175 191 "' Percent 61.8 38.2 ! 89.9 10.1 8.4 91.6 High Int. 16:00 16:00 1 16:30 Volume 14 8 22 i 48 12 60 5 50 55 t Peak Factor 0.773 0.829 0.868 I Ift r F l i i� k PM Accurate Counts File Name :88550005 ,'S Street: Hospital Road 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 ENV Street: Elm Street Start Date :2/11/2004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 Oeather Cloudy Groups Printed-Cars-Trucks Elm St Hospital Rd Elm St i From North From East From West Left Thru !nt Total Start Time Left Right Thru Right 34 - 121 12 4 16:00 14 8 49 7 47 119 16:15 13 6 4 46 1 5 50 120 16:30 10 8 3 3 _ 41 —— 100 j 16:45 6 4 180 20 19 172 460 Total 43 26 : 1 42 92 17:00 11 5 32 3 ! 2 40 117 p 17:15 5 i ! 66 1 2 23 1 72 17:30 9 2 35 1 _37'; - 91 17:45 5 0 48 g 1421 372 Total 30 8 181 314 832 25 25 ! 4 Grand Total 73 34 361 92.6' t 68.2 ' 93.5 6.5 7.4 1 APPrch% 31.8 43.4 3.0 ! 3.0 37.7 Total% 8.8 4.1 Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St P j _ From East From West t L- From_North _ —. _ - Total I Int.Total Start Time Left Right App.Total Thru i Right _ App.Tota! Left Thru _ App. _ pock yrur From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 i 191 i 460 Intersection 1600 69 180 20 200 19 172 Volume 43 26 g.g 90.1 Percent 62.3 37.7 90.0 10.0 34 22 49 12 3g 121 j 61 4 14 8 0.950 16:00 Volume Peak Factor � 16'00 i 16:30 High Int. 15:00 61 5 1 12 50 55 IM Volume 14 8 22 : 49 0.8681 0784! 0.820 . Peak Factor € Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 16:00 16:15 By Approach 1600 200 16 180 196 Volume 43 26 69 i 180 20 g.2 91.8 Percent 62.3 37.7 i 90.0 10.0 16:00 1630 High Int. 16:00 22 12 61 : 5 50 55 volume 14 8 49 0 861 0.891 ' Peak Factor 0.784 n is n Y N/S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 L. E/W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 6w Hospita!Rd -- Elm St Elm St - ----- From North From East From West Start Time Leff Right App. Total Thru i Right, App Total Left Thru ! App.Total Int.Total Peak Hour From D7:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07.00 Volume 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 5 5 9 { Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 i 07:30 Volume 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 4 tea Peak Factor 0.562 High Int. 6.45:00 AM 07.30 07:00 Volume 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 ! Peak Factor 0.333 i 0.417 :. i Hospital Out In Totat t of i _ �r 0r Right Left i JIM i I J 1 1 °i I I 'cam ICIIR o North T;112004 7:0000 AM I =3 y ? 201 1/2004 7,4 5:00 AM i low c A 'Trucks OI o: Iw 60 C I' iu f �R u tA� i� fi 77IS Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name 88550005 =<-/VV Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 2111/2004 City/State Northampton,MA Start Date : 1 Weather Cloudy Page No : i i p Elm St Elm St App _ From East Frol l West + Hospital Rd From North — - Start Time Left Pight A p Total Thru Right__ ApP_Total Left T_h_ru_- App.Total ! Int.Total 'eak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 J I Intersection 0715 � Volume 14 11 25 91 68 159 24 292 316 500 { Percent 56.0 44.0 57.2 42.8 7.6 92.4 1 ' 07:15 Volume 4 2 6 29 10 39 5 1 i7 122 167 r 0.749 c Peak Factor High Int. 07'.30 07:30 07:15 ' Volume 5 4 9 ! 25 24 49 I 5 117 122 Peak Factor 0.694 0.811 ! 0,6481 1 osprta CI i Out In Total ! { � ! 921 25J 1771 11I 1471 j I Right Left j P I e I plCi lol� 6 ~ �I North n c P111220D47:15DDAM M a'2 011120D4 8.00.00 AM OM � 7 O�I SIN 4 i I' 1 l t t j• a I N/S Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 E/W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 I City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 j Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 I Hospit'al Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East _ -ram West --_ - - - - _Start Time P Left Riaht App Total Thru Right App.Total Left Thru AeP.Total _ Int.Total Peak Hour From 07'00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07.15 Volume 14 11 25 95 68 163 24 295 319 507 i Percent 56.0 44.0 58.3 41.7 7.5 92.5 07:15 Volume 4 2 6 30 10 40 5 117 1221 168 0.754 Peak Factor i High Int. 07:30 01:30 07.15 I Volume 5 4 9 1 28 24 52 ! 5 117 122 Peak Factor 0.694 0.784 0.654 i Hospital Out In Total_ 92 281 —1 ---117' j AMR i Right Left j N � I E ! 1 ~I North X1 ^Imp ! I- 7J11/2004 715:00 AM B E ' g' -i iw= !Z11 V2004 B'00'00 AM o f 1 Cars o 5!'-` ',Trucks t t! t F. l i� I i Ow 4 i r. File Name :88550005 { CIS Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts l _fw Street: Im Street 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550005 E 2111/2004 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date : Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 _ Groups Printed-Trucks Hospitai Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East From West _ Start Time Left Right Thru Right" Left _Thu Int-Total 07 00 0 —p` p 0 0 -- 3 —3 I 07:15 0 0 1 0j 0 0. 1 07:30 0 0 ! 3 0 ; 0 1 { 4 i 07.:45 0 0 ; 0 0 - 0 - --- $� 9 i Total p 0 - - 4 0 i 08:00 0 0 ' 0 0 0 1 1 1 08:15 0 1 2 0 0 01 I 3 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 i 0_8:45 0 0 I 2 0 0 0, 2 { Total 0 _4 - 0 0 4 i --------9 Grand Total 0 1 8 0 ! 0 9 1 18 Apprch% 10 100.0 100.0 00; 0.0 100.0 Total% OA 5.6 44.4 00 . 00 50.0 Hospital-- RI - -- - - -- - - Elm St ospital d Elm St i I t From North From East i From West I Start Time Left Right App.Total ? Thru j _R—fight I— App_Total ! Left Thru;_App_Total I Int.Total' Peak Hour From 07:00 to 0_8:25_-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 j Volume 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 5 9 I � Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 {i € 07:30 Volume 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 { 0.562 4 Ef Peak Factor High Int. 6.45:00 AM '07:30 07:00 Volume 0 0 0 j 3 0 3 0 3 3 0333 0.417 . Peak Factor E Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 ON By Approach 07:30 `07:30 07:00 5 0 5 Volume 0 1 1 5 0 Percent 0.0 100:0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 High Int. 08-15 07:30 i 07:00 Volume 0 1 1 3 0 31 0 3 3 { 0.417 Peak Factor 0.250 0.417 j j f e F c h I: r E e r, t i c u 41 I' r. Accurate Counts File Name : 88550005 N/S Street: Hospital Road Site Code :88550005 E/W Street: Elm Street 978 664-2565 Start Date :2/11!2004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 I Weather Cloudy Groups Printed-Cars Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East _ From West _ Right- g eft 9 ^40 Int.Total Start T ime Left Ri � i hr8 Ri i t Thru _ 65 07:00 2 1 8 07:15 4 2 29 10 5 117 167 { 07730 5 4 25 24 7 57; 122 07:45 4 1 : 19 21 8 62 —_ _115 Total 15 8 : 81 64 ! 25 276 469 f 08:00 1 4 18 13 4 56 i 96 F 08.15 0 1 21 13 5 as 1 8 i 9 3 471 78 1 14 S 08:30 4 53 1 91 0845 4 0 17 _9 _$ Tofai 9 — 6--- 70 -- -- —— 200 j 44 20 349 Grand Total 24 14 151 108 j 45 476 818 F Apprch% 63.2 36.8 58.3 41.7 ! 8.6 91.4 Total% 2-9 1.7 i 18.5 13.2 ! 5.5 58.2, i i St Eim f Hospital Rd -- — From West From North From East L 6tart Tirne Left i Right App.Total Thru Right I App.Total Left Thru1 App_Total Int.Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 ! k 25 , 91 68 159 ! 24 292 3161 500 Volume 14 11 7.B 92.4 Percent 56.0 44.0 i 57.2 42.8 s 07:15 Volume 4 2 6 i 29 10 39 5 117 122 i67 I 0.749 G Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 07:30 07:15 122 Volume 5 4 9I 25 24 491 5 117 Peak Factor 0.694 j 0.811 0.648 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 07:15 I f By Approach 07:15 ;07:15 Volume 14 11 25 j 91 68 159 24 292 316 Percent 56.0 440 57.2 42.8 7.6 92.4 r High tnt 07:30 07:30 07:15 Volume 5 4 9I 25 24 49 5 117 122 G.122 i Peak Factor 0.694 0.811 j i i 1: t 1; I r Iw" E i f P P� r i P'NS Street: Hospital Road Accurate Counts File Name :88550005 W Street: Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550005 City/State : Northampton, MA Start Date 2/1112004 Bather Cloudy Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars-Trucks Hospital Rd Elm St Elm St From North From East From West Start Time . Lek-: Right Thru Right Len _ihru _€nt_Tota! 07:00 2_ - 1 - 8 - - - 9 5 43 — -68 07-15 4 2 30 10 5 117 168 07:30 5 4 28 24 7 581 126 07:45 4 1 19 _ _ 21 8 63 j 116 Total 15 _ 8 ----- 85 64 25 281 i 478 08:00 1 4 18 131 4 57 97 08:15 0 2 i 23 13 5 44 87 08:30 4 1 ; 14 9 3 50 81 I 08:45 4 0 i -- 19 9 8 53 ,_ --- 93 Total 9 --7 74 - 44 - 20 2041 358 1 Grand Total 24 151 159 108 45 485, 836 Apprch% 61.5 38.5 59.6 404 8.5 91.5 Total% 29 1.8 j 19.0 12.9 : 5.4 58.0 f ! Hospital Rd i — - Elm St -- - Elm St F _ From North From East ! __ From West Start Time Leff j Right _App.Total L�_ Thru j _ Right j A1P,Tota(l _ Left f Thru r App.Total Int.Total }, aak Hour. rorn 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 _ Intersection 07:15 Volume 14 11 25 j 95 68 163 24 295 319 507 Yp Percent 56.0 44.0 58.3 417 I 7.5 92.5 07:15 Volume 4 2 6 30 10 40 5 117 122 168 0.754 Peak Factor + I High Int. 07:30 07:30 07:15 Volume 5 4 9 + 28 24 52 i 5 117 122 Peak Factor 0.694, 0J84 0.654 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 07:15 07:15 07:15 wo Volume 14 11 25 95 68 163 24 295 319 Percent 56.0 44.0 58.3 41.7 7.5 92.5 c High Int 07:30 07`.30 07:15 F Volume 5 4 9 28 24 52 5 117 122 V Peak Factor 0.694 0.784 0.6541 r f r. u i r E M �i f C H l f N/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts File Name :88550004 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550004 EAN Street: Woodlawn Avei Elm Street Start Date :2/11/2004 City/State Northampton,MA Page No : 1 Weather Cloudy North Elm St woodlawn St Elm St Elm Sty From North From c_ East From South rem West ApP, App. 1 Int. Start Time Left Thru Right Total Leff Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total —Total Ills Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 13 1 14 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 5 1 2 4 7 26 I Percent 0.0 929 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 !fie 16:00 0 3 1 4` 0 0 0 0 ; 1 2 0 3 , 0 0 1 1 8 Volume 0.812 I a Peak Factor 1630 High Int, 1645 16:00 1 2 0 3 1 I Volume 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 j 0417 1 1 0.583 . Peak Factor 0.583 I l North Lim t Out In Total t-- 1j 13i 0� Right Thru Left MIR I I. i e I � � ml°v 1 10 {� North � — ! 742 M w 2111120044:45:00 PM io� i Iol Cr 0 N I _ I k { � I Left Thru RAht b 2j 3%I.O; i 15i I J i ui i _ Out In Total Elm St is 4w. I I St Accurate Counts File Name :88550004 S Street: North Elm Street/Elm Site Code :88550004 'W Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 978-664-2565 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date 2/11/2004 : 1 eather Cloudy Page No : i North Elm St Woodiawn St Elm St Elm St From North From East From South From "Jest Int RX Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Totai`Left Thru Right T � Left Thru ' Right 1 Total Total "teak Hour From 16:00 to 17 46-Peak 1 of 1 intersection 16:30 Volume 4 410 24 438 0 162 10 172 160 323 25 508 12 112 119 243 1361 Percent 09 93 6 5.5 0.0 94.2 5.8 31.5 63.6 49 49 461 49.0 iT.00 0 103 9 112 Q 39 3 42' 37 101 5 143 3 24 25 52 ' 349 I Volume 0.975 t Peak Factor High lnt. 16:30 16:30 17:00 16:45 Volume 1 109 6 116 0 45 2 47, 37 i01 5 143 3 25 39 0 907! 4 Peak Factor 0.944 0.915; 0-888' 't Nom Eirn t i Out In Total f 3451 438 I� 7831 4 241 ?ht Thru Left a "m North Imo) + 1 f11120044:30:00PM w E I j �/11V004 515:00 PM i ww F 6 - E - k I h F 11 4 1� ,Left Thru Ril ht � 3231._25 529' 508; I 10371 Gut In Total i; Elm St it i I { N/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts Fife Name 885500045 EM+ Street Woodlawn Ave!Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550004 Start Date :2/11/2004 City./State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 Weather Cloudy `w North Elm St Woodlawn St Eim St Elm St From North From East From South From West A Int. wM Start Time Left Thru Right App* Left Thru Right Total , Left Thru Right otal Left Thru Right Total Total g Total — - - — -- Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:30 Volume 4 420 24 448 0 162 10 1721 160 325 26 511 13 115 121 249 1380w Percent 0 9 93 8 54 0.0 94.2 5.8 31.3 63 6 5.1 5.2 46.2 48.6 7'00 0 104 9 113 0 39 3 42 37 103 6 146' 3 25 25 53 . 354 Volume 0 975 Peak Factor 1645 ! 111"High Int. 16'30 16:30 17:00 Volume 1 112 6 119 0 45 2 47i 37 103 6 146 3 25 40 0 968 Peak Factor 0 941 0.915 0.875 i E North Llm St ?� Out n Total 3481 I 44J 1 7961 t 4 241 4201 4j t might Thru Left i_ i nl O m.rnl � e North J ° �I �2'7 — r } 2/1120044:30:00 PM ,r U.1 2111120D4 5:15:00 PM i � i Ln cars I T o' I fIo O.n 'Trucks - -----� I w Yt fIf'I Left Thru Riqht E 160'- 32T--_26_1 F ;4 0521, j i Out In Total Elm St ;'.111! F:111! -;wtlw i i i IS Street: North Elm Street i Elm St Accurate Counts File Name :88550004 078-664-2565 Site Code :88550004 tffl Street: Woodlawn Aver Elm Street Start Date :2/1112004 City/State Northampton. MA Page No : 1 i poVeather Cloudy _Groups Printed Trucks Elm St North Elm St Woodlawn St Elm St From North From East_ From South _ From West _ I ez Right int.Total Start Time Left Thru Right: Left Thru_ Rignt_' Leff Thr2 Righo �O 0 1 8 1600 0 3 1 ; 0 0 0 ! 5 16:15 0 1 0 ; 0 0 0 ! 1 1 0 i 6 16:30 0 3 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1i 7 1_6',45 0 6 0 j 0 0 0 D 0 2 - 4 -- 26 i Total 6 13 1 0 0 0; 2 3 0 1 1700 0 1 Q i 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 u^ 1 D: 1 17:15 0 0 01 0 0 0 ; 1 0 0 1I 5 17:30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 D I t Pq 0 0 0! 0 3 0'. 0 0 01 17:45 0 2 Oi 16 Total 0 6 0` 0 6 0 0 5 2 D 2 1 ' Grand Total 0 19 1 0 0 0 1 2 8 2 ; 1 4 5 42 Apprch% 0.0 95 0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 16.7 66-7 16.7 j 10.0 40-0 50.0 Total% 0.0 452 2.4! 0.0 0.0 0.0( 4.8 190 4.8i 2.4 9.5 11.9 --- - Elm St Elm N dl North Elm si Wooawn St PM _ From North From East From South From A ---- APP App i pp, lnt.1 Start Time Left Thru ' Right Total ! Left Thru Right _ 1 Left Thru Right Total . Left I Thru T Right' Total 1 Total _Total ' L__-- - Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17745-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 q 2 4 7 26 j Voiume 0 1"3 1 4 0 0 D 0 2 3 0 5 j F Percent 0.0 92.9 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 i 40.0 60 0 0.0 143 28.6 57.1 h 16:00 8 Volume 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 O 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 0.812 Peak Factor 16-DO 16:3D High Int. 16:45 Volume 0 6 0 6; 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.417 1 1 1 0.583 Peak Factor D.583 'eak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 17:00 16:00 By Approach 16:00 i 16:00 p 5 2 7 % Volume 1 2 4 7 0 13 1 14 0 0 0 0 D 0 71.4 28.6 14.3 28.6 57.1 Percent 0.0 92.9 7.1 - - 16'30 High int. 16:45 - 1 17:00 2 1 3 ! 1 1 1 3 Volume 0 6 0 6 - - 0 Peak Factor 0.583 0.583: 0.583 1 N s Accurate Counts File Name : 88550004 L N/S street: North Elm Street/Elm St Site Code :88550004 E/W Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 978_664-2565 Start Date :2/11/2004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 I Weather Cloudy ___ 6, Groups Printed-Cars Elm St W North Elm Si oodlawn St Elm St From North From East _ From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru ; Right Left: Thru Right Int_Total 36 1 36 85 2 5 22 32 342 16 00 1 116 6 0 24 25 304 16:15 1 92 7 1 38 2 36 72 4 2 1 26 70 7 3 31 23 323 16:30 1 109 6 0 45 2 8 3 25 39 345 16:45 2 96 4 0 40 3i 39 86 - Total 5 413 23 1 159 8 : 137 313 21 13 102 119( 1314 wa 37 101 5' 3 24 251 349 17:10 0 103 9 0 39 2 58 17:15 1 102 5 0 38 66 5 1 3 32 32j 344 p 30 16 i 319 17:30 0 75 4 2 35 1 j 53 98 5: s 17:45 0 64 8 0 34 1 _ 3_3 6_4 _4 I 6 26 _ 18 _ 258 - Total 1 344 26 2 146 7; 181 329 19 12 112 91 1270 Grand Total 6 757 49 3 305 15i 318 642 40 25 214 2101 2584 [ Apprch% 0.7 93.2 6.0 1 0.9 94.4 4.6( 31.8 64.2 4.0 I 5.6 47.7 46.8 Total% 02 29.3 1.9! 0.1 11.8 0.6 12.3 24.8 1.5 1.0 8.3 8.1 _. - - --•-- -- - _ Elm Sf m St North Elm St Woodlawn St El r From g Total j 1 From South From West North From East _ __ i - --- App- App Left i Thru I Right I Dotal I Ina. ! Left: Thru Right ht App. Left Thru Right Left i Thru I Right I Total ! Total i Total Start Time j _ Total - Peak Hour From 16:OC to 1745-Peak 1 of 1 I i Intersection 16:30 2431 1361 Volume 4 41 C 24 438 I 0 162 10 1721 160 323 25 508 12 11 49.0 ° Percent 0.9 93.6 5.5 0.0 94.2 5.8 31.5 63.6 4.9 I 17:00 0 103 9 112 0 39 3 42j 37 101 5 143 3 24 25 521 349 4 Volume 0.975 Peak Factor 16:45 High Int. 16:30 16:30 17:00 Volume 1 109 6 116 1 0 45 2 47 37 101 5 0.888 3 25 39 0.907 j Peak Factor 0.944 0.9151 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 116-45 16:30 23 561 12 112 149 243 1 By Approach 16'00 16:15 Volume 5 413 23 441 1 162 10 1731 187 351 : Percent 1.1 93.7 5.2 0.6 93.6 5.8 33.3 62.6 4.1 4.9 46.1 49.0 16:30 1 17:30 16:45 High Int. 16:00 158 3 25 39 67 Volume 1 116 6 123 ! 0 45 2 471 53 98 5 0.899 0.907 Peak Factor 0.896 1 0.920 1 u i� inn t V i. quo r O 1 i Accurate Counts File Name :88550004 �1/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Coon Site Code :88550004 /W Street: Woodlawn Ave!Elm Street Start Date :2/11/2004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 Weather Cloudy - Groups Printed-Cars Trucks Elm St North Elm St Woodlawn Si Elm St From East _ From South From West From North -- I µ Thru Right i lnt.Total Start Time Left Thru Right' Left Thru_ Pigh-t Len Thru R!9rt °'` -- 22 33 350 5 16'00 1 119 7 0 36 1 37 87 2 2 25 26 309 i 16:15 1 93 7`; 1 38 2 37 73 4 32 241 329 1630 1 112 6 : D 45 2 26 70 7 4 1 i 16:45 2 102 4; D 40-- 3; 39 86 8 3 25 _ 40 352 Total 5 426 24 1 159 8 139 316 21 14 104 123j 1340 3 25 251 354 00 0 104 9' 0 39 33 37 103 6 32' 345 i 17:15 1 102 5i 0 38 I 53 6 ! 0 30 17 324 l 17:30 0 78 4 2 5 1 98 33 g 26 18, 263 17:45 0 66 8 : 0 34 1 33 67 4 -- - Total 1 350 26 2 146 7 1 B1 334 21 ! 12 114 92 I 1286 E 7 26 5 218 211 2626 € Grand Total 6 76 50 3 305 151 320 650 42 Apprch% 0.7 93.3 6.0 0.9 94 4 4.6 1 3".6 64.2 4.2 ! 5J 47.5 46.8 Total% 0 2 29.6 1.9 0.1 11.6 0.6 12.2 24.8 1.6', 1.0 8.3 8-2 - Elm St North Eim Si Woodlawn St - From West Time From East From South Int From North _- - L - - __ APP• , APP• ' i Left Thru RI ht App' Left Thru I Right I App I Left' Thru I Right I Total Left Thru I Right Total Total E Start g Total ; Total , _ __ --- -- In Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of! Intersection 16:30 115 1 62 i 0 172 160 325 26 511 I 13 115 121 249 i 380 Volume 4 420 24 448; 5.2 46.2 48.6 € Percent 0.9 93.8 54 0.0 94.2 5.8 31.3 63.6 5.1 17:00 0 104 9 1131 0 39 3 421 37 103 6 146 3 25 25 531 3b4 t Volume i I 0.975 c !! Peak Factor 17:00 16:45 w High Int. 16:30 16:30 40 681 Volume 1 112 6 119 j 0 45 2 47 37 103 6 146 3 25 0.915 I i` Peak Factor 0.941 ; 0.915 0.875 i Fq'eak Hour From 16:00 to 17.45-Peak 1 of 1 16:15 ' 16:45 ! 16:30 By Approach 16:00 162 10 173 187 353 25 56511 13 115 121 249 Volume 5 426 24 4551 1 5.2 46.2 48.6 r 93.6 5 3 I 0.6 93.6 5.8 I 33.1 62.5 4.4 Percent 1 17:30 16:45 P�X High Int. 16:00 16:30 47! 53 98 6 107 ' 3 25 40 68 Volume 1 119 7 127i 0 45 2 0.900 0.915 Peak Factor 0.896 0.920 G F I N/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts File Name : 88550004 bw E/W Street: Woodlawn .Ave/Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550004 City/State Northampton; MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 !North Lim St 1Noodiawn sf Elm St Elm St From North From East From South From West { qPP qPP.-- - -- APP qPP. )nt. t Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Left! Thru- Right - — - -- ---- Total ! g I .- to ; Total �""" Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08.45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 Volume 1 24 4 29. 0 3 0 3 ! 4 20 0 24 3 3 4 10 66 Percent 3.4 82.8 13 8 0.0 100.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 07:30 1 12 2 15 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 2 0 0 2 25 Volume Peak Factor 0.660 High Int. 07:30 08:15 07:30 07:45 ins Volume 1 12 2 15 : 0 3 0 3 1 7 0 8 0 2 2 41 Peak Factor 0.483 0.250 ! 0.750 0.625 t i orth Glm t inn Out In Total ; 2:3 _29] i 521 4i 241 1! Right Thru Left imp t s j I i y N! A _ r � o j ~ �!� North 1t2 004E _ 22 730.00AM £F- 11� 1211112004815'00ANi o -5 Trucks id Left Thru ___Right 4i 20JL 1 it s 28! ! 24� i_ 52j Out In Total Elm St r lRl r +RIB #YR "FS Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts File Name : 88550004 Code :88550004 W Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 97B-664-2565 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 4eather Cloudy Page No : 1 s North Elm St Woodlawn St Elm St Elm St ~ From North From East_ From South From West _ Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru _Right_ App. -Left; Thru Right App. Left Thru Right I Total Total ' __ _.. i r e-ak Hour From 07.0-0 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07'15 1 Volume 9 376 30 415 2 67 9 78 ` 114 264 17 395 40 140 162 342 1230- Percent 2.2 90.6 7 2 2 6 85.9 11.5 28.9 668 43 117 40.9 47.4 07:15 4 69 13 86 i 31 1 33 1 54 58 5 117 23 34 32 89 325 Volume 0.946 Peak Factor High Int. 07:45 07:15 07:15 . 0-7:45 Volume 2 107 9 118 1 31 1 33 54 58 5 117 4 36 54 94j Peak Factor 0.879 0.591 0.844 0.910 ! I orth tlm i PIP I E Out In Total p i 313 I 41J I_ 728f i 3o1 3761 `91 kt4 Right That Left ; i i I f M - �G wiJ — North 'rLj r 1 7J11/20047:15'OOAM- � �rnl � IJh £ E w +— pjl 1/2604 8 00'00-AM I — Nly r pars I I a~ 0NI ' AI 7; i r F I i i i F Left Thru Right 1941 2 441 171 540? j 3°5 ' °35 -Out In Total I G Elm St c s j! j r. E _ 1 Accurate Counts File Name :885500 04 N/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Site Code : 88550004 ENV Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 978-664-2565 Start Date :2/11/2004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 Weather Cloudy North Elm St Woodlawn St Elm St Eim St ' From North From East From South From%Jest _ f App j Int. : App-Start Tim Left Thru Right App. Left Thru Right Total Left. Thru . Right Total Left Thru Right Total •. Total ! E ° g Total ---- --- -— -- - — -- — ; Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 Volume 10 396 34 440 2 67 9 78 115 285 17 417 43 142 166 351 1286 Percent 2.3 90.0 7.7 2.6 85.9 11.5 27.6 683 4.1 123 405 473 07:15 4 71 13 88 i 31 1 33 54 63 5 122 23 34 32 89 i 332 Volume 0 968 Peak Factor OT45 I High Int. 07:45 07:15 07:15 EM Volume 2 110 11 123 1 31 1 33 ; 54 63 5 855 4 38 56 98 0.894 i 0.591 0 0 895 Peak Factor i R f t on tm t out In Total I 3371 Z�j F 777 i I 341 3961 110, I low Right Thru Left i i I Cpl ` 4- ' f C I: m1� iNorth o � j j -il I � j o ti E dM 7J11/20D4 7:15:00 AM } t w 11/2004 8'00'00 AM ii ri .co� imlr Care OINi •�I� .. Trucks I �l I44 1 k r � F I.� Left _Thru Right 4 1151 -28-5T- 17 j t 5641 1 4i7 1 Tot—at Out In Tott al i Elm St k r. r �l File Name :88550004 f S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts Site Code : 88550004 LW Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 978-664-2565 Start Date :2/1112004 City/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 weather Cloudy I Groups Printed-Trucks North Eim St Woodlawn St Elm St Elm St I From North From East _ From=S outh F_ro_m West Thru Right Int.Total Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right_ Left Thru Right Leff 13 I MIR 07:00 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 2 i 07:15 0 2 0 ' 0 0 0 : 0 5 0 7 0 0 Oj tt 07:30 1 12 2 0 0 0; 1 7 0 2 0 0; 25 07:45 0 3 2 0 0 0_i 0 5 0 , 0 2 _ 2 - - 14 I Totai 1 18 4 0 2 0 2 21 0 3 4 4 59 08:00 0 3 Do 0 0 0 ; 0 4 0 1 0 2 1 10 0815 0 6 of 0 3 01 3 4 0� G 1 O 17 1 08:30 0 7 0 ' 0 0 01 D 3 0! 0 4 08:45 0 6 1 i 0 0 _ _ 0L 3._ ___ 2 _. _ 0 0 01 bb i Total 0 22 1 0 3 01 6 13 O 1 6 3 f Grand Total 1 40 51 0 5 0 8 34 0 4 10 7 114 [ Apprch% 2.2 87.0 10.91 0.0 10D.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 0.0 ! 19 0 47.6 33.3 Total% 0.9 35.1 4.4 ! 0.0 4.4 0.0 I 7.0 29.8 0.0 3.5 8.8 6.1 , North Eim 5t Woodlawn St I Elm St 31m St 1 From North From East From South From West -� - - -? I App. Int. i App. 1 Start Time Left Thru Right; Total Left Thru Right Total I Left i Thru Right I Total Left Thru i Right Total _Total L _ - -- - - Peak Hour From 07:00 to D8:45-Peak 1 of 1 E !Intersection 07:30 € Volume 1 24 4 291 0 3 0 3 4 20 0 24 3 3 4 10 66 Percent 3.4 52.8 13.8 0.0 100.D 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 i 30.0 30.0 40.0 07:30 1 12 2 15 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 2 0 0 2 1 25 Volume 0.660 Peak Factor High Inf. 07:30 08:15 07:30 !07:45 i Volume 1 12 2 15 I 0 3 0 3 i 1 7 0 8 0 2 2 41 f Peak Factor 0.483 0.250 0,7501 D-625 1 E :ak Hour From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 C " 3y Approach 07:30 ;07:30 107:30 07:45 I Volume 1 24 4 29 0 3 0 3 ? 4 20 0 24 i 7 5 13, Percent 3.4 82.8 13.8 OA 100.0 00 1 16.7 83.3 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 G 08:30 I High int. 07:30 08:15 j 07:30 1, Volume 1 12 2 15 1 0 3 D 3 1 7 0 8 I 0 4 1 5 Peak Factor 0 483 ! 0.250 0.750 0.650 is e C k C I i` N/S Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Accurate Counts File Name : 88550004 EM Street: Woodlawn Ave/Elm Street 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550004 City/State Northampton; MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 _ Groups Printed-Cars North Elm 5t Woodlawn St Elm St Etm St From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right _ Len Thru_ Right Left Thru Right Int.Total y 07 00 6 41 8 6 21 0 ! 32 36 1 5 22 27 199 07:15 4 69 13 1 31 1 54 58 5 23 34 32: 325 07:30 3 93 3 0 14 2 J 21 68 6. 9 36 34 289 0745 2 107 9% 0 9 3 _ 19 71 2; 4 36 54! 316 Total 15 310 33 1 75 6! 126 233 14 41 128 147i 1129 08:00 0 107 5 1 1 13 31 20 67 4 4 34 42j 300 DS'15 1 105 4 1 0 12 1 21 57 7 3 30 42' 283 08:30 1 108 0 0 19 1 16 50 2 ; 2 41 46 I 286 08:45 2 118 51 1 14_ 1 i 22 62 5 j 1 36 35i 3D2 ? Total 4 438 141 2 58 6! 79 236 18 10 141 1651 1171 ! ' Grand Total 19 748 471 3 133 12! 205 469 32 ` 51 269 3121 2300 i Apprch% 23 91.9 5.8 1 2.0 89.9 8.1 29.0 66.4 4.5 1 8.1 42.6 49.4 Total% 0.8 32.5 2 0 1 01 5.8 0.51 8.9 20.4 1.4 2.2 11.7 13.6 North Elm St Woodlawn St - Elie St _ Elm St R From North _ From East _ From South From West ! Start Time I Left Thru Right i App. i Left. Thru Right App' Left Thru ! Right App' Left I Thru Right App. Int. L _ Tota_I ! i Total Total Total I Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45- Peak 1 of 1 - - k Intersection 07:15 Volume 9 376 30 4'51 2 67 9 78i 114 264 17 395; 40 140 162 3421 1230 an Percent 2.2 90.6 7.2 2.6 85.9 11.5 1 28.9 66.8 4.3 11.7 40.9 47.4 Volume 4 69 13 86l 1 31 1 331 54 58 5 117' 23 34 32 89 1 325 Peak Factor I ; 0.946 High Int. 07:45 1 07:15 07:15 07:45 Volume 2 107 9 1181 1 31 1 33 54 58 5 117: 4 36 54 94 Peak Factor 0.879; 0.591 ; 0.844: 0.910 e 0 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach Vollume 08:00 4 438 14 456 ±07:00 75 6 82 D715 114 264 17 395,07:15 1 40 140- 162 342 Percent 09 95.1 3.1 1.2 91.5 7.3 I 28.9 66.8 4.3 11.7 40.9 47.4 +' High Int. 08:45 07:15 07:15 07:45 4 Volume 2 118 5 1251 1 31 1 33 I 54 58 5 117 4 36 54 94 Peak Factor 0.912; 0.621 0.844: 0.910 I r a j- r, k bell On bAs Y i Accurate Counts File Name :88550004 IWS Street: North Elm Street/Elm St Site Code :88550004 t fW Street: Woodlawn Ave!Elm Street 978-664-2565 Start Date :2/1112004 r'-ry/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 Weather Cloudy Groups Printed-Cars-Trucks - Elm St North Elm St Woodlawn St Elm St I From North From East From South _ From West Start Time Leif Thru Right Left Thru : 4 yht Left Thru Right Left' Thru :_ Right i Int.Total 07',00 6 42 8; 0 23 0 j 33 40 1 6 24 29 j 212 07'15 4 71 13 1 31 1 54 63 5 23 34 32; 332 11 36 34 i 314 07:30 4 105 5i 0 14 2 22 75 6 4 38 5DI 330 07.45 2 110 11 0 9 3; 19 76 2 a4 132 151 1188 I - Total 16 328 37! 1 - 77 - 6 1i -128 254 14 5 34 44 310 08:.00 0 110 5 1 13 3' 20 71 4 , 3 31 42. 300 08'15 1 111 4 0 15 9 24 61 7 2 45 47 i 301 08:30 1 115 0 0 19 1 ' 16 53 2 _ 315 25 64 _5 j 1 37 351 08:45 2 124 6 1 _ _ 14 __ _ 1 - - Total 4 460 15 ; 2 61 6; 85 249 18 11 147 168 1226 Grand Total 20 788 52' 3 138 121 213 503 32 55 279 319 2414 Apprch al 2.3 91.6 6.0 2.0 90.2 7.8 1 28.5 67.2 4.3 i 8.4 42.7 48.9 f Ie Total % 0.8 32 6 2..2 0.1 5.7 0.51 8.8 20.8 1.3 2 .3 11..6 13.2 i r North Elm St Woodlawn St Elm St From West _1 I From North From East _ I From South _ - _ App APP• Int. E _ PP- A Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total I Total Start Time 1 Left Thru Right 1 Total Left' Thru I Right I _otal j _ _1 g Total - _ Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of Intersection 07:15 pp Volume 10 396 34 440 I 2 67 9 78 I 115 285 4 i7 92.3 ag 5 6B 351 1286 Percent 2 3 90.0 7.7 2.6 85.9 11.5 27.6 68.3 41 - 07:15 4 71 13 88 1 31 1 33! 54 63 5 122 i 23 34 32 89 332 Volume I 0.968 4 Peak Factor 07:45 High int. 07:45 '07:15 07:15 122' 4 38 56 98 � r Volume 2 110 11 123 1 31 1 i 54 63 5 0-8551 0.8951 Peak Factor 0.894 i 0.591 91 k Fkak Hour From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 07:15 t "'- '3y Approach 08:00 07:00 07:15 G Volume 4 460 15 479 1 1 77 6 84 115 285 17 417 : 43 142 166 359 Percent 0.8 96.0 3.1 1.2 91.7 7.1 27.6 683 4.1 12.3 40.5 47.3 07:15 67:15 07:45 11110 High int. 08:45 i 54 63 5 122 j 4 38 56 98 Volume 2 124 6 132 . 1 31 1 0:636 0.855 0.895 j Peak Factor 0 907 Fill r. F 4 11 • r z Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No : 2 North m St 77 rospect t Out In Total 0 _......4- - -- ? Right Thru Le ft H a r d .9h�° •,� Left �q \`: �Or — m,� = H ° m O N NOr1F1 � C Im 2/I11/20044:00:00PM 2/11/20044:45:00PM 1 a ICI — 2 to= TI rucks - a r to _ T xv / Bear -/ Left Thru Right Right Out n Tofil Hos Ital Dr N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date : 2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From E_ast Frorn South From West Bear Hard Hard Bear Start Time Hard left Thru Righ App Hard Bear Rig Rig App Left Thru Righ Rig App. Left Thru Rig Righ App. Left Bear Thru Righ App. Int Left t Total Left Left ht hl Total t ht Total ht t Total Left t Total Total Peak Hair From 16:00 to 17.45-Peak 1 of 1 - - Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 20 Percent 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 83,3 0.0 16:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 6 Volume Peak 0.833 Factor High Int 16:30 16:00 16:45 Volume 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 Peak 0.500 0.500 0.600 Factor IL Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No : 2 North fn t rospect t Out In Total 144 96 240 6 16 74 0 y !� _ I �a ght 7t ru Lek Nard Ri 9h�a 1- --/ Left peed Yi. To tid r .�.G m ,o m North 'o !, iw� i2J1U20044:00:00PM "' ��;� IN�- 2/11/2004 4:45:00 PM N_- I Cars I I � I 1 Bear Left Thru Right Right 25_52T— 65.1_ _44 - 72 —__186 258 Out n Total H050ltal Dr N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name :88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date : 2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North Frorn Northeast From East From South From West Hard Bear Hard Hard ear Ri App Start Time Left Left Thru Riglt Total H B Left Left Rig Rig Total Left Thru Rig t Rig Total Left Thru Rig g t Left Total Ilea' Th Left ru Rig t Total Total ht ht._ _._ _ ... _ _. ._.ht _ht..._._- Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 74 16 6 96 10 22 264 34 330 12 290 45 0 347 25 52 65 44 186 13 219 258 22 512 1471 Percent 0.0 77.1 16.7 6.2 3.0 6.7 80.0 10.3 3.5 83,6 13.0 0.0 13.4 2B.0 34.9 23.7 2.5 42.8 50.4 4.3 16:00 0 29 9 3 41 2 8 56 5 71 2 82 11 0 95 11 18 '17 11 57 3 62 72 8 145 409 Volume Peak 0.899 Factor High Int 16:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16.00 Volume 0 29 9 3 41 1 5 78 16 100 2 82 11 0 95 11 18 17 11 57 3 62 72 8 145 Peak 0.585 0.825 0.913 0.816 0.883 Factor IL t '_-A _'A Accurate Counts File Namo ' 08550003 978-664-2565 5 Site Code : 08550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No : 2 Out In Total Left North �j IT x Q/11/2004 4:45:00 PM 3 Cars 2 cl -Pli� -A Bear _Leq Thru Right Right IAOST�Ital or _--.-.__�.-.......,......._�._...._.__.....�.-_..__............._..-.._...�.............,._......... ...,..«.-...,..,,,..<...o,«....:f.�..._...,�...�.:<...._..:...,...,�........<..,,..,....:.d-,......as,.+v-.-.w......,<...��w.-,,.-.s-y._..v_L�..-�._-�..z.-„___ ._�-..:y __.J_..._i_, ..:n_: ..,. :._:_::. :.......... . .-.,.-. ., t _..- ..__ .,...x._ N/S Street : North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : B8550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West Bear Hard Hard Bear Start Time Hard Left Thru Righ App, Hard Bear Rig Rig Apt)' Thru Righ Rig App. Left Thru Rig Righ App. Left Bear Thru Righ App Int Left - t Total Left Left ht ht Total t ht Total ht t Total Left t Total Total Peak I-lour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 76 17 7 100 10 22 264 34 330 12 294 45 0 351 25 52 65 44 186 13 221 268 22 524 1491 Percent 0.0 76.0 17.0 7.0 3.0 6.7 80.0 10.3 3.4 83.8 12.8 0.0 13.4 28.0 34.9 23.7 2.5 42.2 51.1 4.2 16:00 0 29 9 4 42 2 8 56 5 71 2 84 11 0 97 11 18 17 11 57 3 63 74 8 148 415 Volume Peak 0.898 Factor High Int 16:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16:00 Volume 0 29 9 4 42 1 5 78 16 100 2 84 11 0 97 11 18 17 11 57 3 63 74 8 148 Peak 0.595 0.825 0.905 0.816 0.885 Factor _-I _ A --A __4 N/0Stmet: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 80550003 ENV Street: Route 8/Prospect St 878-604'2505 Site Code :08550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/1i/2004 VVooVhor Cloudy ��P� Page No : 1 - - ___--� __.- wonhsm`a� Route -- ---�--- -Rnmeo From North ' � - - - - �� - - - - ---� ' Fp'p� weo/ s�nn»o Hard Left T»m Right Hard Boa� B*^ A»^fuw T» Right Hard Len Thm Dma' Right Left gr�r l� Right |m Total Lott Left _� n� n� n� n�16:00 o n o 1 o n ƒ b- -2 b V b � o u 1 z o o 16:15 o o o n o o O o o 1 n n n u o o 0 o 1 o z 16:30 n 1 1 u u o o n n 1 » » « n o o n 1 z o o 16:45 n 1 o o o _ o o y y o 0 0 » p [ 0 � 0 o o o Total o 2 1 1 0 _o 0 -_ 0- o- --0_ - o o -_n 0 iV n:om o n o o n o o o n 1 1 o o o o n o n 1 o a 1715 n n o u o o o n o o o u u o n ` u o / o z 17:30 o o o o/ u o n o n n o o u o n 1 o o 1 o 17:45 17:45 o 1 _u �� -_� `�__D-_.�L--_� !_ 1 _�- _0 � 0 0 �g y' o o c o p n Total 1 o o o o o o 1 -z - e- - o- 0-�--0 o - c--- u 6- 3 ' n �u Grand Total n a 1 ` n n o o 1 o o n o o o z V z 13 n ou x»prch% 0.0 60.0 20.0 208 oo uu 8.0 0.0 62 37.5 562 0.0 ou 0.0 no 100.0 0.0 133 007 oo Total% oo 7.9 ua cai 0.0 no oo 0.0 za 15.8 23J oo1 oo 0.0 ou 5.3 0.0 5.3 34�2 no � North Elm S[�- ------� ---' -Prospect St Route 9 - . - - . ' ---- - -- ---^--- --�---^--------�''-- /'------� '--�--�__-'Aar. ~~~ "Hard Righ App. Hard Bear = APp R�h App ' Bear o��Time ' �ou �an rnm t Total Left �� mo mg / Left xw mo -Left rx Rig. n�x xnn, �on Bear T»n" _n�-»- APP 'Int.Int.�/ '' / m � � Total t Total Total H6u��6m l�0d76l�� | � Intersection 16:00 vmom* n 2 1 1 4 o o u u o n 4 o n :1 n o o n n! o e m u 12 20 Percent ou ouo 25.0 25.0 | 0.0 oo uu uo 0.0 100 oo oo | oo no n» 0.0 ' 0.0 16-7 83.3 uu 16-45 o 1 o o 1i o o o n o, o o o o o| o o u n 0' n o s u » n Volume Peak ' paom, ' 0.833 xigh|nt. 16:30 16x0 | i1e4o Volume n 1 1 o c O u o o o o u u o c' o o o 0 n/ u n o o o ravm, ».««o 000n 0.600 poax Hour From 16:00 to 17:45 pouk I o,1 By Approach 1U�0 �0�0 17:08 18:45 16:80 Volume umo z l 1 41 0 0 O o o 1 z o o �zi o o n z u, o z 10 n 12 percen nu 50.0 25.0 25.0 8.3 1e7 75.0 0.0 100. High|ni 18:30 v 0o 10J non 0.0 Volume 0 1 1 O 2 17�4s 1715 16:45 poax ' 1 j - u O 10 0 o 0 1 0 0 5 » o Factor 0.500| ' | n�O0| oa8o| / \ \ � | o�aun | ' \ N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date : 2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West Start Time Hard Left Thru Right Hard Bear Bear Hard Left Thru Right turd Left Thru Bear Right Left Bear ThrU Right Int Total Left g Left Left Right Right Fight Right Left _ 16:00 0 29 9 3 -2 8 56 5 2 83 11 0 11 98 17 -11 3 62 72 II 409 16:15 0 17 3 1 4 6 64 3 6 64 13 0 4 10 15 9 5 44 64 6 338 16:30 0 13 1 1 3 3 66 10 2 73 9 0 3 15 21 13 1 54 69 I 358 16:45 0 15 3 1 .. --1 5 - 78 16_ -12 - 71 --_12. ._ 0. _. 7 _.. 9 - 12 _-11 _- 4 - 59 53 7 366 Total 0 74 16 6 10 22 264 314 12 No 45 0 25 52 65 44 13 219 258 22 1471 17:00 0 18 6 1 7 4 62 11 6 80 12 0 2 17 7 6 5 61 78 4 387 17:15 0 19 4 0 0 10 76 6 4 62 8 0 8 10 13 11 1 52 56 2 342 17:30 0 13 5 0 0 6 62 9 9 91 13 0 4 3 10 0 0 49 46 2 322 17:45 0 12 3 _. 1.. ._.__.2 ----6 - -57 1 2 9 62 6 _.. 2.._..--3. -7 ...-- 5. 3_ 39 57 2 288 Total 0 62 18 2 9 26 257 38 28 295 39 0 16 33 37 22 9 201 237 10 1339 Grand Total 0 136 34 8 19 48 521 72 40 585 84 0 41 85 102 66 22 420 495 32 2810 Apprch% 0.0 76.4 19.1 4.5 2.9 7.3 78.9 10.9 5.6 82.5 11.8 0.0 13.9 28.9 34.7 22.4 2.3 43.3 51.1 3.3 Total% 0.0 4.8 1.2 0.3 0.7 1.7 18.5 2.6 1.4 20.8 3.0 0.0 ; 1.5 3.0 3.6 2.3 0.8 14.9 17.6 1.1 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From_Northeast - From East From South T From West _ _ __ , .-- -- - --------. 1.------ 1--l- --- _ . Bear Hard Hard Bear Start Time Hard Left Thru Righ App. Hard Bear Rig Rig App' Left Thru Righ Rig App' Left Thru , Rig 1 Righ App Left Bear Thru Righ App Int. Left t Total Left Left ht ht Total t' ht Total hl t Total Left I t I Total Total -L.-- L --- L �-- ---.._.�_�_..._._�1---�_ -1-- -- . - Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 74 16 6 96 10 22 264 34 330 12 290 45 0 347 25 52 65 44 186 13 219 258 22 512 1471 Percent 0.0 77.1 16.7 6.2 3.0 6.7 80.0 10.3 3.5 83.6 13.0 0.0 13.4 28.0 34.9 23.7 2.5 42.8 50.4 4.3 16:00 0 29 9 3 41 2 8 56 5 71 2 82 11 0 95 11 18 17 11 57 3 62 72 8 145 409 Volume Peak 0.899 Factor High Int. 16:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16:00 Volume 0 29 9 3 41 1 5 78 16 100, 2 82 11 0 85 11 18 17 11 57 3 62 72 8 '145 Peak Factor 0.585 0.825 0.913 0.816 0.883 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 By 16:00 16:30 16:45 16:00 16:15 Approach Volume 0 74 16 6 96 11 22 282 43 358 21 304 45 0 370 25 52 65 44 186, 15 218 264 18 515 Percent 0.0 77.1 16.7 6.2 3.1 6.1 78.8 12.0 5.7 82.2 12.2 0.0 i 13.4 28.0 34.9 23.7 2.9 42.3 51.3 3.5 High Int. 16:00 16:45 17:30 ) 16:00 , 17:00 Volume 0 29 9 3 41 1 5 78 16 1001 9 91 13 0 113 11 11 17 11 57 5 61 78 4 1481 Fac ok 0.585 I 0.895 1 0.819 I 0.816 I 0.870 N:3Snon : North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 80550003 E8WStrao(: Route 9/P utSt 978'004-2565 Site Code 08550003 City/State NnrtUampWn, M,A Start Date 2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No � 1 u�� wonh��t -- -Pr�ve��T-' '--- ----R��9--- --- -------'-��[DF -- ' - �- --lRoute 9-From Northeast Fmmwmm - - � --' . - -- F-�m�ast --'-- o-- - -- ---'- ''�om' �x\ Start Time Hard Lon T»m n/"�x �� B�' �aFHard --- Tmo ni�^' Hard ,~yt TxmBear R�m^ "�u bear Tx ru mom Int. To�|Left Left Left x�� n�m Right R�� Lon fflAn 3 6a7^ a 415 16:00 o eV o 4 z 8 oa 2 M 1 16:15 o n o 1 4 o 64 u o nu 13 u 4 m 15 8 5 44 sn a 340 16:30 o 14 e 1 » x no m z 74 9 n/ u 15 21 13 , oo 71 1 no* 16:*5 » 16 u -1_ _ 1 - 5 Zu- -16.-_-�L �1 - 12 0 - Z 9 tZ � 4--_69 -- 58 r urz total o Te ir 7 'o _n^ � -un^__ 4�_- __ � _zu- _- '86- _w_ 13 2z1_ znu 22 1491 nxm o m n 1 r 4 nc n e e1 13 o 2 17 7 0 n 61 rn 4 000 17:15 o 19 4 o o 10 76 o 4 oc 8 o o m 13 iu 1 oz 57 2 3*4 17:30 o 13 o o u a om o o 91 m u * 3 10 1 u *n *r o oe* 1/7:4P P - 3 _� `-_�_ _ _ 63 -_ 140 r -- a' ---a _38 57 2 299 m� v om m z y uo uar no ue 297 48 33 --3f 0 uo1 240 m 1357 Grand Total o 130 35 e 1e 48 521 72 41 591 oo u 41 05 102 68 22 422 508 32 2848 Appmxv6 0.0 76o 191 4.9 2.9 7.3 7e-9 10.9 5.7 81.5 12.o 0.0, 13.9 28.7 34.5 23.0 2.2 429 516 33 ruta|m 0.0 4.y 1.2 o.0/ 0.7 1.7 18.3 2.5 1.4 20.8 3.3 0.0, 1.4 3.0 3.6 zx { uo 148 no 11 - - --North Elm St- --------'- Prospect St Route 9 Hospital ' --- Route-~�nm-N�m / From ~~~ '=" e�nr»ne' *am �an �7om n�» xPP Ham omn mo mo App L»� T»m ' n�h nem App um= RWx App. oo» _ n�-h_-� App. - In(.Left | Total Left Left Total I R� '�� . / ��/ Txn~ Peak ��. Left t Total Total-|)HouF From 16:00 to _of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume n 76 17 r 100 10 22 264 34 330 12 294 45 o 351 25 so nn 44 180| 18 221 zne zz 524 '1491. e ,=, 0.0 76.0 17.0 7.0 3.0 u' 80.0 10.3 3.4 83.8 12,e un . 13.4 28.0 |. �49 csr 1 cs 4�2 n1. 1 4.2 16,00 |u zV o 4 4o| e u ns o 7� u a* 11 vom,= n o711 18 17 11 57/ o eu �4 u 148 ' 415 poax ' Factor 0.898 yighm/. 16:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 ' 1e:00 Volume o 29 y 4 4z� 1 u ro 16 100. z ew 11 n o7i 11 18 n 11 571 Peak ` a 03 r* o 148 Factor 0.595 0,825 0.905' u./wo / 0,885 Peak Hour From 1uoom )/:4s Peak 1m1 By Approach 1U�8V l7�OO 10:00 1015 Volume 0 76 17 7 100 , 11 22 282 43 358i 29 297 48 o 3741 25 52 65 *4 1861 15 219 273 18 525 Percent Ko 70o no zo 3.1 6.1 7e.8 12o | 78 794 12.8 oD | 1a.4 2o.0 34.9 z3.7 2.e w.7 cuo 3.4 � 10o ' 1�4 17:3O 16:00 High 17:00 Volume o ze e * *z | 1 n rn 16 100 e 81 13 0 113 11 18 17 11 o7| u n` rn x we Poak Factor o�eo ooSs 0.827 uo1s 0.881 / Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No :2 North m rospec Out In Total —...--- 1 0 7 o p�da Right Thru Left Nard h �0 Left f 4 Pf iN O O M W J IO -.- North - C o + D ._ /11/2004 8:00:00 AM � rn rn._. r� o af l�h r X Bear 4 Left_ Thru Right Right —0� - �L 0�_ —0 Out In Total Hci to Or N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 North Elm St Prospect St f,e 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West _. . Bear Hard Hard Bear ft Bear Righ App, Int Start Time Hard Left Thru Righ App. Hard Bear Rig Rig App. Left Thru Righ Rig App Left Thru Rig Righ App. Le Thru Left t Total Left Left ht ht Total t ht Total ht t Total Left t Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak I'd 1 ------ — -- - Intersection 07:15 Volume 0 7 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 ` 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 18 41 Percent 0.0 87.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 04.4 0.0 flm 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 Volume 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 14 e Peak 0.732 Factor i High Int. 07:45 6:45:00 AM 08:00 6:45:00 AM 07:30 Volume 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 g Peak 0.500 Factor 0.750 0.562 Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No :2 North m M --7705pec. Out n Total 70 229 299 p 73 _..-63-....143._ .--0 Right Thr ...TeR Hard 9hr� �Q� �6 Lei pl0 North nio iNiµ - m m '2111!2004 730:00 AM ;2/11/2004 8:15:00 AM 4-- I _vl m 5 MI Cars wl it I ' Bear Left Thru Ri ht RIghl 32_20 211' 88 299 Out 'Iri - Total Ho pital D KI I _ J _ .-[ _-A _—i _A _-A _ .-1 _—1-1 _ 1 _- .4 --.--I __I __-1 __I , I _ N/S Street: North Elm Su/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name 88550003 E8N8treet: Route 8/Prospect St 878'064-2505 Site Code 80550003 City/State Northampton, MA 8tartDate :2/11/2004 VVromor Cloudy Page No : 1 North Eirn-St - - --- Prospect 7St---'— ------7Ruute 9'--------- -- -- Hospital Dr --------- Route From North From Northeast From East _ _From South From West Hard mox App *pm Bear -u_*»' Hard _A-p_p_� -,u-_e_�_h'Hard App Bear R�_x'_-A_y Be mox App In( Start /�h Txm R� mg Lu�' Tx po Left Thm Rig p �on ar Tx,v Left | To/a| Left Left ,o � Total / ht Total � \ Total Left \ Total Total | Peak Hour pmrnnrnomoa14o Peak 1 of Intersection 07:30 Volume n 143 63 23 229 m 78 148 27 263 * 203 24 o un 17 m 32 20 88 o mz mm 26 047 1*98 pomant oo 62.4 27.5 Mn 3.8 29.7 56.3 10.3 16.2 74.9 Vo uo 19.3 21.6 364 zzJ 0.0 ^uu 47.8 4.0 m�m � 0 cT 18 u o* 1 25 49 0 uu 5 65 0 0 78 8 7 10 0 33 0 75 69 3 147 305 Volume pomk 0.948 Factor nNxmt 07:45 07:30 / or:no nrnn 08:15 Volume 0 5`1 17 S 74 1 25 40 8 uo s 85 u O 78 u 7 10 o ax o u: 86 a lno Factor Peak 0,774 0J92 0.869 0.6e7 0.884 Accurate Counts File Name :88550003 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 Start Date : 2/11/2004 Page No :2 -- art m t / FIrospect,t Out In Total _ 72 237 309 24 63' - 150 0 Right That Left [lard /- Left lyaa�Q �r min .o Y ;0_ ...- °1O i0 �- _. North G t�pl I (MlCo —___.__..__—___._—. x/1112004 7:30:00 AM 1112004 8:15:00 AM O° N L Cars d i /, /- Bear Left Th_ru_ Right R'ht_ �17 19 32.(M20 211 88_ 299 Out _ In rota) h os ital Dr N/S Street: North Elrn St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name :88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 North Elm St Prospect St -Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West Bear Hard Hard Bear Start Time Hard I eft Thru Righ App Hard Bear Rig Rig App. Left Thru Righ Rig App' Left Thru Rig Righ App. Left Bear Thru t Rigl App Int Left [ Total Left Left ht ht Total t ht Total ht t Total Leff t Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 Volume 0 150 63 24 237 10 78 148 27 263 44 214 25 0 284 17 19 32 20 88 0 314 323 26 663 1535 Percent 0.0 63.3 26.6 10.1 3.8 29.7 56.3 10.3 15.5 75.4 92 0.0 19.3 21.6 36.4 22.7 0.0 47.4 48.7 3.9 07:30 0 29 18 9 56 1 25 49 8 83 5 68 9 0 82 8 7 10 8 33 0 76 76 3 155 409 Volume Peak Factor 0.938 High Int 07:45 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:15 Volume 0 55 17 6 78 1 25 49 8 83 5 68 9 0 82 8 7 10 8 33 0 85 97 3 '185 Peak 0.866 Facctor tor 0.760 0.792 0.667 0.896 i N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date : 2/1,1/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Trucks North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West .. -- ----...__.._._ - --------....,.. . -- --- - _.........._... - Hard Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Bear Bear Hard Left Thru Right Hard Left Thru Bear Right Left Bear Thru Right Int Total Left Left Left Right Right. Right Right Left 07:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 07:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 07:30 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 14 07:45 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 Total 0 9 0 6. b.- 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 0 39 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 10 08:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 ; 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 10 08:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 01 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 8 Total 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 11 0 32 Grand Total 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 6 24 0 71 Apprch% 0.0 84.6 0.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 Total% 0.0 15.5 0.0 2.81 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.8 2.8 0.01 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 8.5 33.8 0.0 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast _From East_ From South From West Left - t Total -Left Left r Bear Hard --Total I 9 t' Hard I Total ----- --; Bear g.� .__.-__._.._. _ __ .._... _ Hard I Righ App Hard Bear A Ri h A Ri h App. Bear Righ App. Int. Start Time Left Thru Rig Ri I --, Left Thru J - v i Rig Left j Thru , -Ri I Left Thru I l ht ht Total i Left I t Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 Volume 0 7 0 1 8, 0 0 0 0 01 0 13 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 18 41 Percent 0.0 87.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i 0.0 86.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 0.0 07:30 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 j 0 0 0 0 0' 0 1 7 0 8 14 Volume Peak 0.732 Factor High Int 07:45 6:45:00 AM 08:00 6:45:00 AM 07:30 Volume 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 01 1 0 4 1 °0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 Peak Factor 0.500 0.750 0.562 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 By 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:15 Approach Volume 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 15 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 17 0 18 Percent 0.0 100. 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 93.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 0.0 High Int. 07:45 - 07:00 08:30 07:30 Volume 0 4 0 0 4 - II 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 7 0 8 � Peak 0.562 -1 0.750 0.500 I 0.562 Factor i N/S Street: North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : II8550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550003 Date City/State Northampton, MA Start Dte : 88550004 Weather Cloudy Page a : 1 Groups Printed-Cars --- - North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West Hard Hard Bear Bear Hard Hard Bear Bear Start]-!me Left Left Thru Right Left Left Right Right Left Thru Right Right Left Thru Right Right Left Thru Right Int.Total - Left 07:00 0 15 13 2 3 12 21 4 6 36 2 6 3 0 5 3 0 20 40 3 188 07:15 0 29 12 5 7 23 37 10 9 52 7 0 , 2 . 4 2 2 0 53 79 6 339 07:30 0 27 18 9 1 25 49 8 5 65 8 0 8 7 10 8: 0 75 69 3 395 07:45 0 51 17 - .. _6_ 5... _..._21 30 11 17 44 _. __..... 0.. - 2- ----9 -_..4:. _ _0 .. ..64 72 _ 17 384 Total 0 122 60 22 16 81 137 33 37 197 24 0 15 18 26 17 0 212 260 .29 ....... _1306 08:00 0 32 15 1 1 21 31 5 10 53 6 0 4 2 4 4 0 89 72 3 353 08:15 0 33 13 7 3 11 38 3 12 41 3 0 3 3 9 4 0 84 96 3 366 08:30 0 38 8 8 4 13 45 7 9 36 3 01 5 5 4 3 3 72 91 9 363 08:45 0 25 . . ..._21 7 __-21 ...--38-----2.. --9- -._41.. _.._ 5 -........0__ 8. -0-...--13" ._...__._5! 0 _ -...86 86 12 382 Total 0 128 57 19 15 66 152 17 40 171 17 01 20 10 30 16 3 331 345 27 1464 Grand Total 0 250 117 41 31 147 289 50 77 368 41 0 35 28 56 33 3 543 605 56 2770 Apprch% 0.0 61.3 28.7 10.0 6.0 28.4 55.9 9.7 15.8 75.7 8.4 0.0 23.0 18.4 36.8 21.7 0.2 45.0 50.1 4.6 Total% 0.0 9.0 4.2 1.5 1.1 5.3 10.4 1.8 2.8 13.3 1.5 0.0 I 1.3 1.0 2.0 1.2 0.1 19.6 21.8 2.0 North Elm St Prospect St ------.__.---.-____-- -__---- -- -- P Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South --- ------- - From West Bear Hard Hard - . .. Hard Ri h A Hard Bear A 9 pp, Bear Ri h A Bear Ri Start'rime Left Thru g Pal Rig Rig, t al Left Thru Ri h Rig A Left Thru Rig 1 g PP Left Thru gh App. Int Left -I-- t i Total I Left 1 Left I ht- ht Total �_--J - _._L.. .__t I_- ht Total I --I _h�-t I Total Left I t Total I Total (Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 ---- - I- .......... . Intersection 07:30 Volume 0 143 63 23 229 10 78 148 27 263 j 44 203 Percent 24 0 271 I 17 19 32 20 88 0 312 309 26 647 I 1498 fl 0.0 62.4 27.5 10.0 3.8 29. . . 16.2 74.9 8.9 0.0 19.3 21.6 36.4 22.7 0.0 482 47:8 4.0 Volume me 7 563 103 0 27 18 9 54 1 25 49 8 831 5 65 8 0 781 8 7 10 8 33 0 75 69 3 Peak 147� 395 i Factor 1 0.948 I High Int. 07:45 07.30 07:30 07:30 08:15 Volume 0 51 17 6 74 1 25 49 8 83 5 65 8 0 78 8 7 10 .8 33 0 84 96 3 183 Peak Factor 0.774 0.792 0.869 0.667 0.884 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 By 07:30 Approach 07:15 07:15 07:30 08:00 Volume 0 143 63 23 229 14 90 147 34 285 . 41 214 28 0 283 17 19 32 20 88 3 331 345 27 706 Percent 0.0 62.4 27.5 10.0 4.9 31.6 51.6 11.9 14.5 75.6 9.9 0.0 19.3 21.6 36.4 22.7 0.4 46.9 48.9 3.8 High Int. 07:45 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:45 Volume 0 51 17 6 74 1 25 49 8 83 5 65 8 0 78 8 7 10 8 33 0 86 86 12 184 Peak Factor 0.774 0.858 0.907 0.667 0.959 N/S Street : North Elm St/Hospital Dr Accurate Counts File Name : 88550003 E/W Street: Route 9/Prospect St 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550003 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Cloudy Page No : 1 Groins Printedd Cars-_Trucl<s North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West -------- ----- .. _. Hard Left Bear Bear Hard Hard Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right -Left Thru Bear Right Left Bear n Thru Right It.Total Left Left Left Right Right _- ..____ _._ Right _ .._ -Right _ _ Left 07:00 0 17 13 2 3 12 21 4 6 41 2 0 3 0 5 3 0 21 40 3 196 07:15 0 30 12 5 7 23 37 10 9 55 7 0 2 4 2 2 0 53 83 6 347 07:30 0 29 18 9 1 25 49 8 5 68 9 0 , 8 7 10 8 0 76 76 3 409 07:45 0 55 17 6 5 21 30 11 17 47 7 0 2 7 9 4 0 64 74 17 393 Total 0 131 60 22 16 81 137 33 37 211 25 0' 15 18 26 17 6 214 273 29 1345 08:00 0 32 15 2 1 21 31 5 10 57 7 0 4 2 4 4 0 89 76 3 363 08:15 0 34 13 7 3 11 38 3 . 12 42 3 0 3 3 9 4 0 85 97 3 370 08:30 0 38 8 8 4 13 45 7 9 39 3 0 5 5 4 4 3 74 95 9 373 08:45 0 26 . _.,__21_._- 4 7..__. ..21 38. - 2 I -_g - --43. -----5 - - 01 a- 1--- 13 - 51 - 0-- 87 88 12, 390 Total 0 130 57 21 15 66 152 17 40 181 18 0 20 11 30 17 3 335 356 27 1496 Grand Total 0 261 117 43 31 147 289 50 77 392 43 0 35 29 56 34 3 549 629 56 2841 Apprch% 0.0 62.0 27.8 10.2, 6.0 28.4 55.9 9.71 15.0 76.6 8.4 0.0! 22.7 18.8 36.4 22.1 0.2 44.4 50.8 4.5 Total% 0.0 9.2 4.1 1.5 1 1.1 5.2 10.2 1.81 2.7 13.8 1.5 0.0 1.2 1.0 2.0 1.21 0.1 19.3 22.1 2.0 North Elm St Prospect St Route 9 Hospital Dr -Route 9 From North From Northeast From East From South From West Bear Hard Hard Bear Hard Righ App. Hard Bear i App. I Righ App. I Righ App Bear Righ App Int, Start Time Left Left Thru t Total I Left' Left Rht Rig t I Total Left Thru t I Rig Total Left Thru Rig t Total Left i Left Thru t Total Total �. ._ -, _ . ht I� �_-n�---_ -. - -L----I --L - (Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 Volume 0 150 63 24 237 ; 10 78 148 27 2631 44 214 26 0 2841 17 19 32 20 88' 0 314 323 26 663 1535 Percent 0.0 63.3 26.6 10.1 3.8 29.7 56.3 10.3 15.5 75.4 9.2 0.0 19.3 21.6 36.4 22.7 0.0 47.4 48.7 3.9 Volume 0 29 18 9 561 1 25 49 8 83 '; 5 68 9 0 82! 8 7 10 8 331 0 76 76 3 155 409 Peak 0,938 Factor High Int. 07:45 ! 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:15 Volume 0 55 17 6 78 I 1 25 49 8 83 5 68 9 0 82! 8 7 10 8 33; 0 85 97 3 1851 Peak Factor 0.760 ' 0.792 I &866' 0.667 0.896 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Approach 07:30 07:15 07:15 07:30 08:00 Volume 0 150 63 24 237 14 90 147 34 285 41 227 30 0 298' 17 19 32 20 88 3 335 356 27 721 Percent 0.0 63.3 26.6 10.1 I 4.9 31.6 51.6 11.9 13.8 76.2 10.1 0.0 - 19.3 21.6 36.4 22.7 0.4 46.5 49.4 3.7 i High Int. 07:45 07:30 07:30 '07:30 08:45 Volume 0 55 17 6 78 i 1 25 49 8 83 5 68 9 0 82 8 7 10 8 33' 0 87 88 12 187 Peak 0.760 I 0.858 1 0.909 0.667 I 0.964 Factor I N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 j EM' Street, Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 City/State Northampton. MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East From South _ From West APP. . - -- Apo ------- --APP• APP Int. Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left: Thru Right Total Left Thru Right. Total :_Total Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 0 2 1 3 1 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10; 20 Percent 0.0 66.7 33.3 14.3 85.7 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 100.0 0.0 I 16:00 Volume 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 Peak Factor 0 625 High Int. 16:00 16:00 16'45 Volume 0 i 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 1 Peak Factor 0.375 ' 0.438 j 0.500 fi lce or Out In Total 6R o! i 3I [- —C)1 r Right That Left a 1 � Y i i ! s i I I I 1 F I ' ;d I North �i, I°I r J O F i J rn loi io; l p 1i °'—� � � ► 2111120044'0000 PM 12/11i20044'45,00PM r o ;Trucks 0 ` ' F I I I 1 I: Left Thru Right 0 0' 0 3! 01 i_ —31 Out In Total West Hospital Dr IAs �I rlw �1A i NIS Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 401W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550002 i •ity/State : Northampton, MA Start Date 2111/2004 `vJeather : Clear Page No : 1 I I Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East From South From West App Int. Start Time ' Left Thru- Right T pad Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right App� Left Thru Right` Total Total ak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 intersection 16:15 Volume 10 2 4 16 12 554 4 570 ! 25 0 21 46 4 509 12 525 . 1157 Percent 625 12.5 25.0 2.1 97.2 0.7 54.3 0.0 45.7 08 97.0 2.3 we 17:00 5 2 2 g 3 139 2 144 6 0 4 10 1 145 5 151 ! 314 Volume Peak Factor j 0.921 High int. 17:00 16:45 i 16:15 17:00 Volume 5 2 2 9 1 145 1 147 ' 7 0 6 13 i 1 145 5 151 Peak Factor 0.444 0.969 I 0.885 0.869 I -ice Dr a I Out_1 In Total € 16 1-- ?4 € _ k t j 41 21 iDi E Right Thru Lef, I I r I F ' I p t a c PM piol .. I tno t ° North = �'`" .°r>'L ► 25i 9U20044115:ODPM 2/11/2004 5:00:00 PM la loi OI _�'� ;Cars 1�lo` I G y ' k i i k Left Thru Ri ht I 251 01 211 j i I 261 46 C 721 Out In Total West Homital Dr c N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 E/W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 City/State Norithampton, MA Start Date :211112004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East From South From West App -- — — APP• - — — APP -- APP. Int. i Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right. Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total S Teak Hour Prom 16.00 to 17^.5-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:15 i Volume 10 3 4 17 12 559 4 575 25 0 21 46 4 518 12 534 1172 Percent 58.8 176 23.5 2.1 97.2 0.7 54.3 00 45.7 0.7 97.0 2.2 Volume 5 2 2 9 3 141 2 146 6 0 4 10 1 146 5 152 317 Peak Factor 0.924 High Int. 17:00 ! 16.45 '16:15 17:00 Volume 5 2 2 9 1 146 1 148 7 0 6 13 1 146 5 152! ;_ Peak Factor 0472 0.971 0.885 I 0.878; " i Office r j € Out In Total E i 81 j 17 7=, . 41 .3 ,1-101 j E Right Thru Left 4 I i 'MCI i MINI I i �1C• No th I I O :5 7111/2D04 4'15:00 PIN -i A iii Imo,E iutt !2111,12004 5-00:00 PM I Iii i sf �ml Ti`o Cars ml ,; rO ;Trucks --- 'In i i Le_ft Thru Right 25 01 211 271 I 4] 73� CIS Ou In Total West Hospital or t !AI! �I N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name : 88550002 Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 8855000 amity/State Northampton. MA Start Date :2!1112004 Heather Clear Page No : 1 Groups_Printed-T_r_u cks _ Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 i _ From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left _ Thru Right Left Thru . Right Left Thru I Right! Int.Total 16:00 0 1 1 1 3 0; 0 0 0 0 2 oi 8 1615 0 1 0 . 0 1 01 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 16:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 t 16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0! 0 0 0 . 0 5 0 _ 6 Total 0 2 1 1 6 0 0 D 0 6 10 0 20 17-00 0 0 0 i 0 2 01 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 t 17.15 0 2 0 ; 0 0 0! D 2 Oi 0 1 1 6 f 17:30 0 1 0 0 0 01 0 D 01 0 1 Oi 2 I 1_7:45 0 0 0 ; 0 1 0 _ - 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0; 1 f Totai 6 3 O i 0 3 O 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 12 Grand Total 0 5 1 1 9 0 0 2 0 0 13 1 1 32 Apprch% 0.0 83.3 16.7 10.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 ' Total% 0.0 15.6 3.1 i 3.1 28.1 0.0 0.0 62 0.0 0.0 40.6 3.1 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East i From South _ From West Start Time I Left Thru Right App. Left Thru? Right I App ! Left Thru Right: App' Left Thru Right i App nt. Total ! I Total i i Total _ _ Total i Total eak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 oil s Intersection 16:00 I 1, Volume D 2 1 3i 1 6 0 7 0 0 0 01 0 10 0 10 20 Percent 0.0 66.7 33.3 14.3 85.7 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 16:00 0 1 1 2 ' 1 3 0 4I 0 0 0 0 ' D 2 0 2 8 Volume E 0.625 Peak Factor High Int. 16:00 , 16:00 16:45 i PM Volume 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 Peak Factor 0.375 0.438 0.500 j Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17-45-Peak 1 of 1 v Approach 16:00 16:00 1 16:30 i 6:00 I L Percent 0.0 66.7 33.3 3 14.3 85.67 0.0 7 0.0 100 0 0.0 2 16 40 100.0 0.0 10 I High Int. 16.00 16.00 17. 5 Volume 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 5 !Peak Factor 0.375 0.438 D.250 0.500 i tl li i 4 i f I. PIN 1:- .. N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 L E/W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 f Groups Printed-_C_ars Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 * From North From East_ _ From South From West Start Time Lert Thru Right Left; Thru Right Leff Thru Right Left_ Thru Right; I nt.Total I 16 00 1 0 0 3 142 0, 3 0 8 : 2 142 3' 304 16-15 1 0 0 4 138 0; 7 0 6 2 113 2 273 16:30 4 0 21 4 132 1 6 0 5 1 133 21 290 1_6:45 0 0 0 1 145 1 _6 0 6 0 118 3 I 280 Total 6 0 2 12 557 2 22 0 25 5 506 10, 1147 ? 17:00 5 2 2 : 3 139 2 6 0 4 1 145 5 314 1715 1 0 2, 1 143 Oi 5 0 2 0 107 3i 264 17:30 0 0 1 ; 3 145 0 2 0 4 5 90 4 254 17:45 2 1 2 2 130 0 i 5 0 3 0 99 - 51 249 E Total 8 3 7 9 557 2' 18 0 13 6 441 171 1081 60 Grand Total 14 3 9i 21 1114 4 i 40 0 38 11 947 27 2228 Apprch% 53.8 11.5 34.6 1.8 97.8 OA I 51.3 0.0 48.7' 1.1 96.1 2.7 Total% 0.6 01 04 ! 0.9 50.0 0.21 1.8 0.0 1.7; 0.5 42.5 1.2 i Office Dr Route 9 ! West Hospital Dr Route 9 E j From North From East _ �_ _ From South_ From West S Start Time! Left Thru ; Right: App'I Left' Thru Right App I Leff Thru Right! App. Left Thru Right App. Int. L Total i T_otal Total I Total Total ----- - -- - - -- - Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17 45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:15 i k Volume 10 2 4 161 12 554 4 570 25 0 21 46. 4 509 12 5251 1157 Percent 62.5 12.5 25.0 21 97.2 07 1 54.3 0.0 45.7 0.8 97.0 2.3 Volume 5 2 2 9� 3 139 2 144 6 0 4 10 1 145 5 151 314 Peak Factor I 0.921 High Int. 17'00 ! 16:45 16:15 17:00 Volume 5 2 2 91 1 145 1 147 7 0 6 13 1 145 5 151 Peak Factor 0.444 1 0.969 0.885; 0.869 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 16:30 ` 16:45 16:00 16:15 Volume 10 2 6 18 8 572 3 583 22 0 25 47 , 4 509 12 5251 Percent 55.6 11.1 33.3 1.4 98.1 0.5 46.8 0.0 53.2 0.8 97.0 2.3 1 High!nt. 17:00 1 17:30 16:15 1 17:00 I Volume 5 2 2 9 3 145 0 1481 7 0 6 13 1 1 145 5 151 Peak Factor 0.5001 0.985 I 0.904 j 0.869 r a im h t on II!# 1 N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name : 88550002 */W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550002 ity/State Northampton, NSA Start Date :2/11!2004 ,Veather Clear Page No : 1 Grou ssPrinted-Cars-Trucks Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 I From North From East _ From South F_rom West I Start Time Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right: Left Thru Right Left Thru Right int.Total g - 9 i 16:00 1 1 1 4 145 0 3 0 8 2 144 3! 312 16:15 1 1 0 4 139 0, 7 0 6 2 114 2 276 PP 16:30 4 0 2 . 4 133 1 . 6 0 5 1 135 2 293 I 16:45 0 0 0 1 146 1 6 0 6 0 123 3! 286 Total 6 2 3 13 563 2 22 0 25 5 516 10; 1167 17:00 5 2 2 3 141 2i. 6 0 4 1 146 5; 317 17:15 1 2 2 i 1 143 0 5 2 2 D 108 4! 270 17:30 0 1 1 ! 3 145 0 2 0 4 5 91 4 256 1_7.45 2 1 2 2 131 0 j 5 0 3 0 99 5; 250 Total 8 6 7 ! 9 560 2 18 2 13i 6 444 181 1093 Grand Total 14 8 10 j 22 1123 4' 40 2 38' 11 960 28 2260 s Apprch% 438 25.0 31.2 ! 1.9 97.7 0.3 50.0 2.5 47.5 1.1 96.1 2.8 Total% 0.6 0.4 D4 ; 1.0 49.7 0.2 1.8 0.1 1.71 0.5 42.5 1.2 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East From South From West L App. i App. APP --- APP. ! Int. " Start Time i Left Thru i Right Left Thru -Right j Left Thru Right Total ; Left Thru Right Total I Total Total Total i i_- -___j Hour From 16:00 to 1745-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:15 Volume 10 3 4 17 12 559 4 575 25 0 21 46 4 5i8 12 534 i 1172 [ Percent 58.8 17.6 23.5 I 2.1 97.2 0.7 ; 54.3 0.0 45.7 0.7 97.0 2-2 17:00 5 2 2 9' 3 141 2 146 6 0 4 10 1 146 5 152 317 Volume 0.924 Peak Factor High Int. 17:00 16:45 16:15 17:00 Volume 5 2 2 9 1 146 1 1481 7 0 6 13 1 146 5 152 i Peak Factor 0.472 1971 11 0.885 0.878 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17,45-Peak 1 of 1 113y Approach 17:00 16:45 1 16:00 ; 16:15 12 534 L Volume 8 6 7 21 8 575 3 586 22 0 25 47i 4 518 Percent 38.1 28.6 33.3 1.4 98.1 0.5 46.8 0.0 53.2 0.7 97.0 2.2 r High Int. 1700 ' 16:45 16:15 j 17:00 Volume 5 2 2 9 1 146 1 148 7 0 6 13 1 146 5 152 Peak Factor 0.583 0.990 0.904 0.878 I L R F w N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts Fife Name :88550002 ENV Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 iw City/State Northampton; MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East _ From South From West App.Start Time Left Thru Right Total Lett Thru Right Total Left i Thru Right TAovta' Left Thru Right Total Total Peak Hour From 07.00 to 08-45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07,15 Volume 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 21 2 0 0 2 0 19 0 19 42 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 95.2 00 100.0 0.0 00 00 100.0 00 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 : 13 Volume 0.808 Peak Factor High Int. 6:45,00 AM 07 15 107:15 ;07:30 Volume 0 0 0 0 : 0 6 0 61 2 0 0 2 0 8 0 8 i lip Peak Factor 0.8751 0.2501 0.594 UhIET r Out In Total 0_ Oj I,_oi i 1s11 Right Thru Left imp , I I 4 I ICC[f' 10 "n � North slo I`n m I I y o 0 2112004 7:1 00 AM f S� 1111 O I I :H C;OI I �NI N 7/11/2004 8'00:00 AM 1 af IN OiL ! Ni ITrucks Io p! fE r �Itl I Left Thru Richt _ 0— 0] t _' 2i a 3i 11111 Out to Total West Hospital Dr 11111! 11111 i N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name : 88550002 WW Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550002 s'ity/State Northampton, MA Start Date 2/11/2004 -YJeather : Clear Page No : 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East South From West _ _ A� int. Start Time Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Right App. Left Thru Right Total Lett Thru Right Total I Total Total _ Total _ _ _ _. — ak our From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 i Intersection 07:30 Volume 2 0 2 4 22 356 7 385 20 0 11 31 10 647 34 691 1111 Percent 500 0.0 50.0 5.7 92.5 1.8 64,5 0.0 35.5 14 93.6 4.9 07:30 0 0 2 2 3 128 2 133 9 0 3 12 2 156 15 173 1 320 j Volume 0.868 I Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:15 1 Volume 0 0 2 2 3 128 2 133 9 0 3 12 0 174 6 180 PwPeak Factor 0.500 0.724 ! 0.646 0.960 `s t j Unjoe Dr Out In Total g 17 _ 41 L ?J i 2' 01 21 Right Thru Left i G k I i I - i h� North J i 2/11/20047 30:00-AM- W1 o 1/2004 6:15'00 AM � 1 � K (Cars. t i c I I I is Left Thru Right 201.._ oq 11. 56 _ 1 31 L �) . Out in Total West HOSOital Dr PM IWO ii N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 f E1W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date .2/11/2004 l Weather Clear Page No : 1 Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From East From South From West _ Int. pp 1 i App Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right TTo al Left! Thru Right Total Left Thru_Right 1 Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07-15 Volume 1 0 3 4 24 393 7 424 27 0 13 40 11 629 42 682 i 1150 # Percent 250 0.0 75.0 5 7 927 1 7 67 5 0 0 32 5 1.6 92.2 6.2 0730 0 0 2 2 ' 3 132 2 137 9 0 3 12! 2 164 15 181 332 Volume { 0.866 Peak Factor { High Int. 07:30 07:30 07:15 1 07.30 j Volume 0 0 2 2 ; 3 132 2 137 10 0 3 13 f 2 164 15 181 i � Peak Factor 0.500 0.774,1 0.7691 0.942 r s mce or i Out In Total 18; 3 0 1; t Right Thru Left y �ll.. G M A t ol" o North w l m I ; �ImICI!K 2 2Y 12004 7:15'00 AM 2111120048:00:00 AM SIN i c,o ,Cars �iro I�lo i L) ;rr ITrUGks iA� irn'm_ I I 1 " I Left Thru Right k f7i 01 131 68i 4'4 i 106 hw Out In Total West Hosoital or ii i i� �i i N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 /W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550002 'ity/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 _ _ Groups Printed-Trucks __ 5ffice Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 ! From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left. Thru Right; Left Thru Right Left; Thru I_Right.- Int.Total 1 07:00 0 0 0 0 6 0; 0 0 0 0 1 1 ! 8 111! 07:15 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 13 07:30 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0! 12 0_7:45 0 0 0_ 0 5 _ 0 1 _0 0 _ 0 0 2 O I 7 - - _ - 7 Totai 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 16 1 i 40 j RA 08:00 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 ! 0 4 01 10 08:15 0 0 01 1 1 01 0 0 0, 0 1 01 3 08:30 0 0 0 0 3 Oi 1 0 0 i 0 6 0( 10 E 08:45 0 0 0' 1 4 01 0 0 0 0 4 01 9 Total 0 0 0 3 13 01 1 0 0 0 15 01 32 € Grand Total 0 0 0 3 34 01 3 0 0 0 31 1 j 72 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 81 91.9 0.0 i 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.9 3.1 Total% 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 47.2 0.01 4.2 0.0 0.0 ; 0.0 43.1 1.4 Office Dr Roufe 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 p From North From East_ _ i _ From South___ From West Start Time Left Thru 1 Right App Left Thru I Right, App. I Left Thru I Right App Left Thru Right App. Int. Total L Total ? ! _Total Total, Total eak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 Volume 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 21 i 2 0 0 2 0 19 0 19! 42 Percent 00 0.0 0.0 1 4.8 95.2 0.0 ! 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OA 07:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 0 0 21 0 5 0 5 13 Volume Peak Factor 0-808 tl High Int. 6:45:00 AM 07:15 07:15 j 07:30 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 0 0 2 0 8 0 8! Peak Factor 0.8751 0.250 0.5941 6 i Oeak Hour From 07:00 to 08.45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 07:00 D7:00 07:00 !07:15 r Volume 0 0 0 0j D 21 0 21 2 0 0 2 0 19 0 19 Percent - - - ( 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 High int. - 07:00 07:15 07:30 F pp Volume - - 0 6 0 6 I 2 0 0 21 0 8 0 8 w. Peak Factor -, 0.875 i 0.250 0-594 h i% pp fi f: ? I I N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name : 88550002 E/W Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550002 City/State Northampton, VIA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North _ From East From South From West Start Time Left' Thru Right i Left Thru RR jg ht Left Thru Right Left Thru! Right 1 Int.Total - 07:00 1 0 0; 7 48 0 2 - 0 - 1 2 68 8; 137 0715 0 0 1 8 88 2. 8 0 3 1 137 144 262 07:30 0 0 2 3 128 2 9 0 3 2 156 is! 320 07:45 1 0 0; 5 71 3: 6 0 6 _8 150 _ 61 256 Total 2 0 3 23 335 7; 25 0 13 13 511 43; 975 08:00 0 0 0 7 86 0i 2 0 1 0 167 71 270 w 08:15 1 0 0 7 71 2 3 0 1 0 174 6 265 0830 0 0 3i 5 86 2 6 0 2; 1 167 0 277 08:45 2 0 0 j 2 84 0i 3 - 0 3 j 0 193 7 294 Total 3 0 3 21 327 4 14 0 7i 1 701 251 1106 Grand Total 5 0 6 44 662 11 1 39 0 201 14 1212 681 2081 Apprch% 45.5 0.0 54.51 6.1 92.3 1.51 66.1 0.0 33.91 1.1 93.7 5.31 Total% 0.2 0.0 0.31 2.1 31.8 0.51 1.9 0.0 1.011 0.7 58.2 3.31 w Office Dr Route 9 - West Hospital Dr - Route 9 From North j From East _I From,South From West l - - App -- T- qPP• I - -r -- i ApP - -- APP. Int. lI Start Time Left Thru I Right ' Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leff Thru Right Total 1 Total Total; I Total Total i Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:30 3 !! Volume 2 0 2 4 1 22 356 7 385 j 20 0 11 31 10 647 34 691 i 1111 G Percent 50 0 Q.0 50.0 5.7 92.5 1.8 64.5 0.0 35.5 � 1.4 93.6 4.9 M 07:30 0 0 2 2 3 128 2 133 ( 9 0 3 12; 2 156 15 173 320 Volume Peak Factor 0.868 High Int. 07:30 i 07:30 1 07:30 08:15 Volume 0 0 2 2 ; 3 128 2 133 I 9 0 3 121 0 174 6 180 Peak Factor 0.5001 0.724 0.646 0.960 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 08:00 07:15 107;00 1 08:00 Volume 3 0 3 6 23 373 7 403 25 0 13 38 1 701 25 7271 Percent 50.0 0.0 50.0 j 5.7 92.6 1.7 65.8 0.0 34.2 0.1 96.4 3.4 High Int. 08:30 i 07:30 07:30 i 08:45 j Volume 0 0 3 3 3 128 2 1331 9 0 3 121 0 193 7 200 I Peak Factor 0.500 0.758 1 0.7921 0.909 i_. f I: I' am IM Y N/S Street: West Hospital Drive Accurate Counts File Name :88550002 I,WIVV Street: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550002 ,ity/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/1112004 n`Weather Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars-_Trucks w Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North From _ _ From South From West I Start Time Leff Thru Right' Left! Thru Right Left Thru Right Leftj Thru Right i lnt.Total 07:00 1 0 0 7 54 0 2 0 - 1 2 69 9; 145 07.15 0 0 1 8 94 2 ; 10 0 3 : 1 142 14t 275 07:30 0 0 2 3 132 2 9 0 3 2 164 151 332 07:45 1 0 01 5 _ 76 3 I 6 _ 0 _ 6 ! 8 _ 152 61 263 i Total 2 0 3' 23 356 7 ; 27 0 13 13 527 44i 1015 !w? 08:00 0 0 O j 8 91 0 1 2 0 1 0 171 71 280 08:15 1 0 0i 8 72 2 3 0 1 0 175 61 268 08:30 0 0 3 5 89 2; 7 0 2! 1 173 0+ 287 k D_8:45 2 0 0: 3 88 O i 3 0 3 0_ _ 197 71 _ 303 Total 3 0 31 24 340 41 15 0 7 1 716 25j 1138 Grand Total 5 0 61 47 696 11 42 0 20i 14 1243 69 2153 i Apprch% 45.5 0.0 54.5 6.2 92.3 1.5 J 67.7 0.0 32.3 1.1 93.7 52 Total% 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.2 32.3 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.9 ! 0.7 57.7 3.2 e t Office Dr Route 9 West Hospital Dr Route 9 From North - From East � From South __ ! From West i Start Time Leff Thru Right App Left Thru !, Ri ht App I Left I Thru Right App I Left Thru Ri ht I App. Int.1 E g Total i g I Total g _Total 1 1 _ 9 Total ! Total eak Hour From 0T00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 € Volume 1 0 3 41 24 393 7 424 I 27 0 13 40 11 629 42 682� 1150 Percent 25.0 0.0 75.0 1 57 92.7 1.7 67.5 (1,0 32.5 1.6 92.2 6.2 i Volume 0 0 2 2 3 132 2 137 9 0 3 12 2 164 15 181 332 Peak Factor 0.866 High Int. 07:30 1 07:30 07:15 07:30 Volume 0 0 2 2 3 132 2 137 10 0 3 13 2 164 15 181 g Peak Factor 0 500 0.7741 0.769 0.942 t H Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 M"By Approach 08:00 07:15 07:00 ;08:00 f Volume 3 0 3 61 24 393 7 424 I 27 0 13 40 I 1 716 25 742 i Percent 500 0.0 50.0 1 5.7 92.7 1.7 1 67.5 O.D 32.5 0.1 96.5 3.4 r High Int. 08:30 07:30 i 0 7:15 08'45 Volume 0 0 3 3: 3 132 2 137 10 0 3 13 0 197 7 204 Peak.Factor 0.500 i 0.774 I 0.769 0.909 PIN r k f E h r 1: j N/S Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 } ETW Location- Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 City/State Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 j I North Maple St Route 9 Maole St Route 9 From North From East From South From West App. int. i Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total . Peak Hour From 1 0:00 to 17-45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 1600 Volume 1 3 1 5 1 6 0 7 3 0 1 4 0 11 2 131 29 I Percent 20 0 60.0 20-0 14.3 85.7 00 75.0 0.0 250 00 846 15.4 16:30 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 8 peer Volume 1 Peak Factor 0'900 High Int. 16:30 16:00 16:15 1645 i Volume 1 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 4 1 51 Peak Factor 0 417 0 438 0.500 0-650 orth Maple St Out In Total I Oi 5�_ 51 1; 3_ 1i l Right Thru Left i 10 - E North L ► 2/11%2004 4:OQ00 PM o F m 11/2004 445`00 PM j mI i m of NI.... r ° m o — Trucks ply is r t Left Thru Right 3 E TO 1/! 06i In Total Maple st r e NIS Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name : 88550 001 978-664 2565 /W Location: Route 9 Site Code : 88550001 Start Date :2/1112004 i ',ity/State Northampton; MA Page No : 1 Weather : Clear I on Route 9 ! North Maple St Route 9 Maple St m Fro West j From North From East From South _ _ _— A -- App. App. int. Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total ; Total —-- -- s weak Hour From 16:00 to 1745-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 E Volume 48 75 88 211 61 453 53 567 39 62 51 152 43 328 33 404 1334 I Percent 22.7 35.5 41 7 10.8 799 9.3 25.7 40.8 33.6 1&6 81.2 8.2 1 PO 16:00 12 32 15 59 17 109 19 145 ' 10 14 13 37 18 86 6 110 ! 351 I Volume 0.950 Peak Factor 16:30 High Int. 16:00 16:00 16:30 i Volume 12 32 15 59 17 109 19 145' 6 19 17 42 8 96 13 117 1 Peak Factor 0 894 0.978 0.905 0.863 s i ortn Maple put In Total 158; 21'11 3691 - E SBi 753 481 - Right Thru Left DFQ k 1 E r. I' J North m jot m j; I O 7J 1120044:00`.00 PM . r Pw cn! ern! m 0 2111/20044:45:00 PM - -- ' ,Cars Oi, a!m F I F l � k G ti IMP Left Thru Right 391 62[ 511 169 152. I 321; f Out In Total Maole Si 'il .�t I N/S Location :North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 E/W Location,. Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550001 City/State - Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather : Clear Page No : 1 ! North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East From South From West _ H 1m. pp Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total -- n� Peak Hour From 16:00 to 1745-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 49 78 89 216 62 459 53 574 42 62 52 156 43 339 35 417 ! 1363 Percent 227 361 41 2 10.8 800 9.2 26.9 39.7 33.3 10.3 81 3 8.4 16:00 12 33 15 60 17 113 19 1491 10 14 13 37 18 89 6 113 359 Volume 0.949 Peak Factor High Int. 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:30 } Volume 12 33 15 60 17 113 19 149 i 17 15 11 43 8 99 13 120 1, w Peak Factor 0 900 0.963' 0.907 0.869 6 ortn Maple t so Out In Total I 158, 2161 3741 891 782 i Right Thru left { ' V b prrp1 �IRIT r aO North 01 � - ( 2/11%2004 4'DO'OD PM 0 2/11/20044'45.00 PM L D :Cars i Si O'"' 'Trucks l I Left Thru Right 42; 621 521 t - 17.5� '1561 I_ 331 Out In Total Maole St L Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 NiS Location : North Maple StreetliViaple Site Code : 88550001 i 0.91W Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Start Date :2/1112004 :ity/State Northampton, MA Page No : 1 .Jeather : Clear Groups Printed-T_rucks North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North Fro_m East _ From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru . Rightt Left Thru Right Left Thru Right! Int.Total i i6:0p 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 U D a 0 ' 8 16:15 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 OR 16.30 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 D 1 0 3 D 8 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 .1 6 Total 1 3 1 1 6 0 3 0 1 0 11 2' 29 wx 1 7:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 ': 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 7:15 0 0 0 0 3 Oj 1 0 0 1730 0 1 D 0 1 0, 0 0 0 0 2 OI 1_7:45 0 0 0 ' 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0; 2 Total 0 1 0 1 7 1 1 0 1 0 5 01 17 o- Grand Total 1 4 1 2 13 1 4 0 2 . 0 16 2� 46 Apprch% 16.7 667 16.7 12.5 81.2 6.21 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 88.9 11.1 y Total% 22 8.7 2.2 4.3 28.3 2.2! 8.7 0.0 4.3 ! 0.0 34.8 4.3 � S North Ma pie St Route 9 Maple St From West From East _ __ From South _ - From North g A qpp Int. Start Time Left Thru Right A Left Thru Right App Left Thru Ri ht pp Left Thru Right Total Total App' g Total g Total 9 Total � -- - y =ak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 1 3 1 5 1 6 0 7 3 0 1 4 0 11 2 13 29 MP Percent 20.0 60.0 20.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 75.0 0.0 250 00 84.6 15.4 16:30 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 j 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 1 8 1, Volume I 0.906 Peak Factor High Int. 16:30 • 16:00 16:15 16:45 Pill Volume 1 2 0 3 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 2 D 4 1 5 Peak Factor 0.417 0.438 0.500 0.650 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Way Approach 16:00 17:00 16 00 1 16:00 Volume 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 3 0 1 4 0 11 2 13 Percent 20.0 60.0 20.0 11.1 77,8 11 1 75.0 0.0 250 0.0 84.6 15.4 ` High Int. 16:30 17:00 16:15 16:45 i Volume 1 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 2 0 0 PIP eak Factor 0.417 0.562 0.500 0.650 c G f Y F. f r I, C I!. n Pill I N/S Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 E/W Location, Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 City/State Northampton; MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather : Clear Page No : 1 ; Groups Printed-Cars _ North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North _ From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru _Right Int.Total 16:00 12 32 1 s i 7 108 19 10 i 4 13 its 86 6 351 1615 15 13 29 16 117 10 15 15 11 8 65 6'i 320 16:30 12 13 19 12 111 12 6 19 17 8 96 13 338 1_6:45 9 17 25 16 116 12 8 14 10 9 81 8 _ 325 Total 48 75 88 01 453 53. 39 62 51 43 328 33', 1334 17,00 13 12 24 18 105 20 9 21 8 12 67 81 317 17:15 9 19 23 11 124 23 9 9 9 8 66 8; 318 1730 12 16 27 10 96 11 7 12 i3 10^ 62 1 289 j 1745 10 20 20 14 101 141 8 7 8 10 74 8; 294 ; Total 44 67 94 53 426 68 33 49 38 46 269 31 ; 1218 Grand Total 92 142 182 114 879 121 72 111 89 89 597 641 2552 Apprch% 22.1 34.1 43.8 10.2 78.9 10.9 26-5 40.8 32.7 11 9 79.6 8.51 Total % 3.6 5.6 71 45 344 4.7 2.8 4.3 3.5 3.5 23.4 2.5 j i North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East _ From South From West � qPP• - - - qPP. - � APP- - T -----r App. '---Int. j Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru_ Right Total i Left Thru l Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total i ss Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 intersection 1600 I `t Volume 48 75 88 211 61 453 53 5671 39 62 51 152 43 328 33 404 1334 Percent 227 35.5 41 7 10.8 79.9 9.3 ! 25.7 408 33.6 10.6 81.2 8.2 16:00 12 32 15 59 17 109 19 145 10 14 13 37 . 18 86 6 110 351 Volume 0.950 Peak Factor High Int- 16:00 16:00 1fi:30 16:30 Volume 12 32 15 59 17 109 19 145 j 6 19 17 42 8 96 13 117 Peak.Factor 0.894 0.978! 0.905 0 863 j Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17 45-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 1600 16:30 16:15 16:00 1 Volume 48 75 88 211 57 456 67 580 38 69 46 153 43 328 33 4041 Percent 22.7 355 41.7 9 8 78.6 11.6 24.8 45.1 30.1 10:6 81.2 8.2 High Int. 16:00 17:15 16:30 16:30 Volume 12 32 15 59 11 124 23 1581 6 19 17 42 1 8 96 13 117 l Peak Factor 0.894 0.9181 0.911 0.863 I ;an jott ; e N/S Location: North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 "M Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :885500 j i ylState : Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 ` vVeather Clear Page No : 1 _Groups Printed-Cars-Trucks ______ 1 g North Maple Si Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left _Thru Right Int.Total 16:00 12 33 15 17 113 19 1D 14 13 18 89 6� 359 16:15 15 13 30 17 118 10 17 15 11 8 66 7 j 327 0111111 16:30 13 15 19 12 112 12 6 19 18 8 99 13 . 346 1645 9 17 25 16 116 12 s 9 14 10 9 85 9 I 331 Total 49 7s 89 62 459 53 42 62 52 43 339 35 1363 17:00 13 12 24 19 107 21 9 21 8 12 68 8 I 322 17:15 9 19 23 11 127 23 ; 10 9 9 8 58 81 324 E 17:30 12 17 27 10 97 11 I 7 12 13 16 64 7 i 293 1_7:45 10 20 20 14 102 14 8 7 9 10 74 8 i_ 296 Total 44 68 94 54 433 69 ! 34 49 39 46 274 31 j 1235 Grand Total 93 146 183 116 892 122 j 76 111 91 89 613 661 2598 { Apprch% 22.0 34.6 43.41, 10.3 78.9 10.81 27.3 39.9 32.7 11.6 79.8 8.6 Total% 3.6 5.6 7 0! 4.5 34.3 4.7 ' 2.9 4.3 3.5 3.4 23.6 2.5 ' 4� a North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East _ From _South From West^_ A to Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right! Total Left Thru - Right Totl Total -a _ :ak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16'00 k Volume 49 78 89 216 62 459 53 574 42 62 52 156 43 339 35 417 j 1363 39.7 Percent 22.7 36.1 41.2 10.8 80.0 9.2 26.9 33 3 10.3 81.3 B.4 16:00 89 33 15 50 17 113 19 149 10 14 13 37 18 89 6 113 359 Volume 0.949 Peak Factor High Int. 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:30 Volume 12 33 15 60 17 113 19 149 17 15 11 43 j 8 99 13 120 P 'eak Factor 0.900 0.963 I 0.907 ! 0.869 i Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45-Peak 1 of 1 My Approach 16:00 16:30 6:15 16:00 Volume 49 78 89 216 58 462 68 588 41 69 47 157 43 339 35 417 'Percent 22.7 36.1 41.2 9.9 786 11.6 26.1 43.9 29.9 103 81.3 8.4 F High int. 16.00 17:15 16:15 16 30 Volume 12 33 15 60 11 127 23 161 ! 17 15 11 43 B 99 13 120 Weak Factor 0.900 0.913 0.913 0.869 E 'n C i' G C I: Rn I. f .w. N/S Location. North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 EM/ Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code : 88550001 City/State : Northampton, MA Start Date :2111/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 I North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From __East _ _ From South From West Left Thru Right I App. Int App Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Total Total Peak Hour;From 07:00 to 0845- Peak 1 of 1 i Intersection 08:00 Volume 1 2 4 7 3 18 2 23 2 2 5 9 3 22 2 27 66 Percent 143 28 6 57.1 13.0 783 8.7 22.2 22.2 556 11.1 81 5 7.4 08-45 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 11 0 0 1 1 0 9 1 10 22 Volume 0.750 Peak Factor High Int.. 08:30 0845 0800 08-45 p Volume 0 1 4 5 1 8 2 11 1 1 2 4 0 9 1 101 Peak Factor 0.350 0.523 0.562 0'675 North Maple st Out In_ Total i 7; 71 j 141 4 2� Right Thru Left tE _ f I 4 m'n: O ID-' �7I iN � North L � �'11l20048:00:00AM 211,1/2004 8'45',00 AM i �N- rn 'Trucks m o : 4 _ I 1 Low ! 1 Left Thru Right 4 2 2i Sj Out In Total Ma le St K ;#III i I LUS Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name : 88550001 7W Location:Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 ty/State : Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 f Weather :Clear Page No : 1 1 North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 ; From North From East From South From West j Start Time Left Thru Right App' Left Thru Riaht App Left Thru Riaht APP• eft Thru Right; App' Int. Total Total Total Total Total I `:ak Hour From 07:00 to 08.45-Peak 1 of 1 I Intersection 08.00 Volume 55 53 36 144 35 180 45 260 23 49 71 143 63 516 42 6211 1168 Percent 38-2 36.8 25.0 13.5 69.2 17.3 16.1 343 497 10.1 83.1 68 } 08.15 Volume 19 i2 10 41 4 60 13 77 7 11 20 38 23 142 8 173 ' 329 I Peak Factor 0.888 ! High Int. 08:45 08:45 08:15 08:15 j Vp Volume 15 17 14 46 17 45 17 79 7 11 20 38 23 142 8 173 Peak Factor 0.783 0 823 0.941 0.897 1 4 Imarth Maple St Out In Total 1571 144,• 30l f 36i 53� 55 ' Right Thru Left I t I i t i I, _ t F N i tCD rFFt m North N i mT o d ~ 2/11/2004 8:45:OO AM ° N;� o ICars ! TIC I i pp o,N r✓ .- � �I, Flo l Ci- iN ti I! L Left Thru Right � -�23 1301 1431, 2731 Out in Total Maole St i N/S Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 E/W Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 City/State : Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 i North Maple St Route 9 Maple Si Route 9 From North From East _ From South From West int. Start Time Left Thru Right App otal Left Thru Right Total± Left Thru Right Total Left Thru_Right Total ! Total I! Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection D8:00 Volume 56 55 40 151 3-8 198 47 283 . 25 51 76 152 66 538 44 648 1234 ; Percent 371 364 265 13.4 70.0 16.6 164 33.6 50.0 10.2 83.0 6.8 I 08:45 15 17 14 46 18 53 19 90 9 13 16 38 11 138 22 171 345 Volume 894 Peak Factor High Int 08:45 08:45 0815 08:15 Volume 15 17 14 46 18 53 19 90 1 7 12 21 40 24 146 8 1781 Peak Factor 0.821 0786 0 950 0.910 ortn Map—le-9t j Out In Total 1641 I 1511 315'; (41! --t-- 401 55; 561 Right Thru Lett zis 1 1 �1I11 t z k North .nl to 2/11/2004 800:00 AM ° 211112004 8-45:.00 Aivl i 3��i ,v m •Cars :v�, ,. O� X ;Trucks Left Thru Right 251 511 76i i — . : _ F 137' 1521 I 2891 Out In Total Maple St I� A4A MR i N/S Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name : 88550001 , ,,E/W Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 City/State : Northampton. MA Start Date :2/1112004 Weather : Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Trucks North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 RM From North From East From South From West_ Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru_ Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right` Int Total j 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 i 8 07'15 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 12 j 07:30 0 1 0 2 13 0 0 0 1 0 8 0; 25 07:45 0 0 1 3 5 1 0 1 0 0 2 0_ 13 Total 0 2 1 7 23 1 0 1 1 0 20 2 58 i 08:00 1 0 0 0 4 04 1 1 2 0 2 1 I 12 ? 08:15 0 1 0 1 4 0 I 0 1 1 1 4 01 13 E 08:30 0 1 4 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 7 01 19 0_8:45 0 0 0 1 8 2 i 0 0 1 0 9 _ 1 _ 22 Total 1 2 4 3 18 2 2 2 5 3 22 21 66 Grand Total 1 4 5: 10 41 3 2 3 6 3 42 4 124 Apprch% 10.0 40.0 50.0 18.5 75.9 5.61 18.2 27.3 54.5 6.1 85.7 8.2 Total% 0.8 32 40 ' 6.1 331 2.4; 1 6 24 4.8 2.4 33.9 3.2, 4 North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 = From North From East From South From W_ est 6 - APP• APP I Total Total lopt Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right I Total ' Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right APP• - 'eak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 08:00 V Volume 1 2 4 7 3 18 2 23 ` 2 2 5 9 ! 3 22 2 27 ' 66 Percent 143 28.5 57.1 13.0 78.3 8.7 22.2 22.2 55.6 11.1 81.5 7.4 08:45 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 11 0 0 1 1 0 9 1 10 22 N f Volume 0.750 Peak Factor High Int. 0830 08:45 08:00 08:45 PO Volume 0 1 4 5 1 8 2 111 1 1 2 4 0 9 1 10 Peak Factor 0.350 0.523 . 0.562 0.675 R I Peak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 k poByApproach 07:45 07:15 07-45 08:00 Volume 1 2 5 8 7 25 1 33; 2 3 4 9 3 22 2 27 Percent 12.5 25.0 62.5 21.2 75.8 10 1 22.2 33.3 44..4 11.1 81.5 7.4 High Int. 08:30 0730 1 08:00 08:45 Volume 0 1 4 5', 2 13 0 15 1 1 2 4 0 9 1 10 C OPPeak Factor 0.400 0.550 1 0.562 0.675 I4 i F F i .o N/S Location : North Niapie Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name :88550001 E/W Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 City/State : Northampton, MA Start Date :2/1112004 Weather Clear Page No : 1 i Groups Printed-Cars North Maple St Route 9 Mapie St Route 9 From North From East_ From South _ From West _ Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int Total 07:OG 11 14 2 4 32 5 6 5 8 7 66 7 ! 168 j 07:15 11 12 8 6 55 9 12 13 14 16 113 6i 275 its 0730 11 21 7 5 45 9 9 17 9 16 108 8i 265 0_745 24 12 6 4 52 10 8 11 16 14 110 71 274 Total 57 59 23 19 184 33 35 47 47 53 397 28 982 i i 08:00 10 12 5: 4 38 7i 1 13 21 18 118 5 252 I'M 08:15 19 12 10 4 60 13 j 7 11 20 23 142 8 I 329 08.30 11 12 7 10 37 8 6 12 15 11 127 8 264 0_8;45 15 17 14• 17 45 17 j 9 13 15 11 129 21 ( 323 T I otal 55 53 36 35 180 45j 23 49 71 63 516 42 ; 1168 Grand Total 112 112 59 54 364 781 58 96 118 116 913 701 2150 Apprch % 39.6 39.6 20.8! 10.9 73.4 15.7 ; 21.3 35.3 43.4 10.6 83.1 6.4 Total% 52 5.2 27: 2.5 16.9 3.6 2,7 4.5 5.5 54 425 3.3 North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East _ From South _ From West App. - - A App -- APP• fnt. Start Time Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Let Thru Right Total ! Total L - -- -- - - _ -- -- Peak Hour From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 08:00 E Volume 55 53 36 144 35 180 45 2601 23 49 71 143 63 516 42 6211 1158 Percent 38.2 36.8 25.0 13.5 69.2 17.3 16.1 34.3 49.7 10-1 83.1 6.8 Volume 19 12 10 41 4 60 13 771 7 11 20 38 23 142 8 173 329 Peak Factor j j 0.888 High Int. 08-.45 08:45 08:15 08:15 1 Volume 15 17 14 46 17 45 17 791 7 11 20 38 23 142 8 1731 Peak Factor 0 783 0.823 0.941 0.897 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 07.30 08:00 07:15 08:00 Volume 64 57 28 149 35 180 45 2601 30 54 60 144 63 516 42 621 Percent 43.0 38 3 18.8 13.5 69.2 17.3 1 20.8 37-5 41.7 10.1 83.1 6.8 Hiah Int. 07:45 08:45 i 07:15 08:15 Volume 24 12 6 42' 17 45 17 79 12 13 14 39 23 142 8 173 Peak Factor 0.887 0.823 0.923 0.897 J noi, r. 0 it N i; C no > iw N/S Location : North Maple Street/Maple Accurate Counts File Name : 88550001 FF / Location: Route 9 978-664-2565 Site Code :88550001 itylState Northampton, MA Start Date :2/11/2004 leather : Clear Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Cars_-Trucks North Maple St Route 9 Maple St Route 9 From North From East From South _ From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru , Right Left Thru Right Left' _Thru ' Right Int-Total 07'00 11 i4 2 4 34-- 5 ' 6 6 8 1 71 8 ! i7o" 0715 11 13 81 8 58 9 12 13 14 16 118 7 287 0730 11 22 7 7 58 9 9 17 10 16 116 8 290 i 07:45 24 12 7 i 7 57 11 8 12 16 14 112 _ 7 : 287 [ Totai 57 61 24 26 207 34 35 48 48 53 417 301 1040 08:00 11 12 5 4 42 7 2 14 23 18 120 6 264 PIN 08:15 19 13 10 5 64 13 7 12 21 24 146 8! 342 08:30 11 13 l i I 11 39 8 . 7 12 16 13 134 8 ! 283 0_8.45 15 17 14 18 53 19 9 13 16 1 138 22 345 i otal 56 55 461 38 198 47 25 51 76 66 538 44 1234 T s t Grand Total 113 116 64 ! 64 405 81 60 99 124 119 955 74 2274 Apprch% 38..6 39.6 21.8 11.6 73.6 14.7 : 21.2 350 43.8 , 10.4 83.2 6.4 Total% 5.0 5.1 2.8 2.8 17.8 3.6 ; 2.6 4.4 5.5 5.2 42.0 3.3 i P � 4 North Maple St Route 9 - - - Maple St Route 9 From North From East From South From Nest _ - - - _ -- -7 A Int. t Start Time Left Thru , Right App. otal Left Thru Right Total I Left I Thru Right Total ' Left Thru Right Total I Total d 0111 it ak Hour From 07:00 to 08:45-Peak 1 of 1 ntersection 08:00 Volume 56 55 40 151 38 198 47 283 ! 25 51 76 152 66 538 A 648 1; 1234 Percent 37.1 36.4 26.5 134 70.0 16.6 16.4 33.6 50 0 102 83.0 6.8 08:45 15 17 14 46 18 53 19 90 9 13 16 38 11 138 22 171 345 5 Volume F'eak Factor 0.894 g High Int. 08:45 08:45 08:15 08:15 Volume 15 17 14 461 18 53 19 90 i 7 12 21 40 ! 24 146 8 178 Weak Factor 0 821 i 0.7 861 0.910 Peak Hour From 07:00 to 0845-Peak 1 of 1 t Approach 07:30 07:30 08.00 08:00 c Volume 65 59 29 153 23 221 40 284 25 51 76 152 66 538 44 648 j Percent 42.5 38.6 19.0 8.1 77:8 14.1 16.4 33.6 50.0 10.2 83.0 6:8 High Int.. 07:45 08:15 08:15 08.15 EEF Volume 24 12 7 43 ' 5 64 13 82 7 12 21 40 24 146 8 178 + f llPeak Factor 0.890 0.866 0.950 0.9101 r h Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Turning Movement Counts I ---I -----f .__._-1 ----I _—.-A —".—I ,.--.—I --1 ———-1 —A ----4 ----1 .:-- 1.—.c z:.-I ---. -1 ,,- ,i - .4 1 , : t,I —;: VM Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Traffic Appendix >- Turning Movement Counts >- Crash Diagrams >- Trip Generation Capacity Analyses fM OR 777 r.". F 1 0 a"I.1 7 Technical Appendix Cooley Dickinson Expansion Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared by VMNanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Springfield, Massachusetts April 2004 PARKING TURNOVER SURVEY RESULTS Cooley Dickinson Hospital Lot H Tuesday 13 JAN 04 Non-designated Spaces Capacity 230 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 Occupancy 194 227 231 234 234 234 235 226 178 127 95 85 Peak Occ. 235 102% 84% 99% 100% 102% 102% 102% 102% 98% 77% 55% 41% 37% Turnover 1.8 1.7 Volume 408 194 36 8 5 4 16 25 27 31 17 19 26 Avg. 5.64 Duration # % 1.0 72 18% 18% 3 1 0 1 3 3 4 8 6 7 10 26 2.0 44 11% 28% 3 1 0 1 0 4 8 9 7 2 9 "a 3.0 18 4% 33% 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 3 4.0 22 5% 38% 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 5.0 34 8% 47% 12 4 1 2 1 0 6 8 6.0 21 5% 52% 14 1 0 0 0 1 5 7.0 35 9% 60% 26 2 2 0 0 5 i--5 8.0 69 17% 77% 57 11 1 0 0 g; R, M A 9.0 48 12% 89% 37 9 0 A 4 W W 0 10.0 29 7% 96% 25 4 0 9 2% 98% 11.0 12.0 7 2% 100% 7 408 01dMain PARKING TURNOVER SURVEY RESULTS Cooley Dickinson Hospital Lot B Tuesday 13 JAN 04 All Spaces Capacity 187 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 Occupancy 32 117 173 182 187 180 173 165 149 117 57 46 Peak Occ. 187 100% 17% 63% 93% 97% 100% 96% 93% 88% 80% 63% 30% 25% Turnover 1.7 1.7 Volume 322 32 86 61 20 25 19 19 7 22 11 5 15 7vg. 4.90 Duration # % 1.0 90 28% 28% 1 4 9 13 14 8 8 3 10 3 2 15 2.0 33 10% 38% 1 1 5 2 7 2 1 2 4 5 3 3.0 22 7% 45% 1 1 5 1 1 3 4 0 3 4.0 25 8% 53% 1 4 9 0 1 1 3 1 5 5.0 8 2% 55% 1 1 21- 0-1 1 1 1161 1 01, 6.0 10 3% 58% 0 1 5 1 0 1 2 ,gl tq 7.0 22 7% 65% 1 15 1 2 0-3 8.0 38 12% 77% 9 13 14 0 Z 9.0 53 16% 93% 11 36 6 0 10.0 12 4% 97% 2 5 5 gm 11.0 7 2% 99% 2 5 12.0 2 1% 100% 322 South PARKING TURNOVER SURVEY RESULTS Cooley Dickinson Hospital Lot A Tuesday 13 JAN 04 Non-designated Spaces Capacity 128 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 Occupancy 52 99 124 124 125 124 115 116 114 93 77 71 Peak Occ. 125 98% 41% 77% 97% 97% 98% 97% 90% 91% 89% 73% 60% 55% Turnover 2.7 2.8 Volume 349 52 54 48 16 19 15 26 25 30 26 21 17 vg. Duration # % 1.0 116 33% 33% 7 16 6 6 3 9 11 12 9 14 6 17 2.0 76 22% 55% 7 7 10 4 10 3 7 7 2 4 15 3.0 28 8% 63% 3 1 5 1 3 0 2 2 3 8 a �` 4.0 29 8% 71% 1 3 3 1 0 1 3 1 16 \\� f 5.0 15 4/0 76/0 1 7 2 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 y \\ 6.0 19 5% 81% 5 2 6 1 2 0 3 �� 7.0 5 1% 83% 2 0 1 0 0 2 try 8.0 27 8% 90% 5 14 7 0 1 9.0 23 7% 97% 12 3 7 1 ' 10.0 6 2% 99% 4 1 1 11.0 1 0% 99% 1 0 ` 0 0 .' a �, 12.0 4 1% 100/0 4 349 NewMain COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL Parking Occupancies Tuesday January 13,2004 Wed Thu Facility Capacity 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 14-Jan 15-Jan Lot 182 58 68 120 171 170 170 170 161 161 150 119 106 99 167 165 Handicap Permit 21 6 6 6 17 14 13 15 14 15 8 4 9 5 15 18 Cardio Rehab 5 2 2 0 3 3 4 5 4 3 6 6 6 5 4 1 Regular 129 44 53 101 126 126 126 125 118 117 115 94 77 72 123 119 Physician Parking 8 27 6 7 13 25 27 27 25 25 26 21 15 14 17 25 27 snow loss 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Lot 187 26 32 114 172 181 187 185 174 164 151 117 60 46 188 182 Valet 26 3 3 7 23 29 32 35 27 22 22 17 8 5 32 36 Regular 161 23 29 107 149 152 155 150 147 142 129 100 52 41 156 146 snow loss 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 17 Lot 23 4 16 22 23 23 23 23 22 22 21 11 4 1 23 23 Lot 46 5 23 41 43 47 46 45 44 40 28 17 16 14 45 46 MRI/Patient 13 2 6 11 12 13 13 13 13 11 8 5 4 5 13 13 Handicap 3 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 3 Regular 30 3 17 30 30 31 30 30 29 26 18 11 11 8 29 30 Lot 43 12 19 26 39 46 50 47 45 46 32 23 22 17 49 44 Lot F 10 10 8 8 8 9 8 9 10 10 9 10 9 8 7 6 Reserved-Hospital Vehicles 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 5 5 4 4 Regular 4 4 2 2 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 Lot G(Physicians) 20 1 8 18 18 21 17 19 16 18 15 14 13 17 18 18 Lot 298 74 226 268 282 294 294 288 294 291 230 170 140 131 292 276 Regular 229 64 193 226 230 233 233 233 234 227 174 123 91 86 233 222 Radiation Therapy 3 0 1 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 Rehab 14 0 11 12 14 14 14 11 12 13 14 11 11 7 12 12 Handicap Permit 17 0 2 4 8 12 12 11 12 13 6 3 4 5 14 7 Patient/Visitor 8 3 4 5 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 10 7 Oncology 8 3 0 2 4 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 7 8 3 6 Clergy 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 Blood Donor 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Physician 16 3 15 16 15 16 16 14 16 16 15 15 14 11 15 16 Rear of Power Plant 0 2 4 14 18 16 16 16 18 18 15 8 2 2 17 17 Roadway 0 0 0 1 2 6 16 16 13 11 9 7 2 1 13 14 Subtotals Handicap 41 6 8 10 26 29 28 28 28 31 16 8 14 11 32 28 Restricted-Patient 53 11 24 33 44 49 49 48 49 48 48 40 41 38 46 44 Restricted-Employee 70 16 36 53 63 69 67 64 63 67 57 50 46 51 63 66 Other 645 159 336 536 643 666 683 678 657 635 539 398 273 236 678 653 Grand Total 809 192 404 632 776 813 827 818 797 781 660 496 374 336 819 791 Percent of capacity 24% 50% 78% 96% 100% 102% 101% 99% 97% 82% 61% 46% 42% 101% 98% Snow Loss 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 20 Valet Drop 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 2 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 Drive Arounds 0 0 0 0 8 12 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 207 419 647 792 842 855 840 819 796 676 511 394 351 843 817 CDHoccupancy2003.x1s Appendix Table Cooley Dickinson Hospital Patient Statistics fy 2000-2002 Total Statistic fy 2000 fy 2001 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Sep-02 FY 2002 ccu patient days 3,231 3,276 302 260 278 287 281 282 244 287 268 278 270 281 3,318 e2 patient days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 7 telemetry patient days 1,650 1,921 213 166 182 191 172 154 163 182 172 164 163 163 2,085 nursery patient days 2,014 1,975 166 136 167 165 149 176 199 176 131 146 186 187 1,984 ob patient days 2,240 2,265 185 169 175 211 183 198 189 225 187 202 211 214 2,349 pedi patient days 183 270 31 26 28 36 21 33 26 36 24 22 30 20 333 W1 patient days 577 899 84 68 63 81 63 81 87 78 83 76 92 77 933 w2 patient days 7,309 7,751 704 650 543 734 672 721 569 623 532 541 523 601 7,413 w3 patient days 10,062 10,558 926 936 823 1,034 912 984 785 822 756 750 743 796 10,267 psych patient days 6,837 7,185 598 584 546 573 538 621 598 600 550 557 586 336 6,687 total patient days 34,103 36,100 3,209 2,995 2,805 3,312 2,991 3,251 2,864 3,031 2,703 2,736 2,804 2,675 35,376 ancillary depts-source mgt stats operating room minutes 452,130 465,945 37,860 37,230 37,320 42,990 38,070 39,090 35,940 41,010 38,790 41,070 35,625 36,765 461,760 same day care cases 4,722 5,129 423 442 395 463 393 434 441 423 422 447 424 445 5,152 delivery room births 918 921 80 64 74 77 75 77 79 75 70 65 79 81 896 emergency dept visits 32,639 34,101 3,134 2,741 2,688 2,837 2,782 2,706 2,929 3,061 2,945 3,156 3,105 3,044 35,128 endoscopy procedures 1,865 2,218 257 246 212 214 199 215 221 236 242 240 250 274 2,806 w2 observation hours 17,232 12,917 1,132 863 860 817 847 1,089 893 541 1,266 747 1,051 1,443 11,549 w3 observation hours 13,419 12,219 713 702 402 728 842 733 537 894 847 941 404 822 8,565 joint center obsery hours 0 18 2 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ob observation hours 933 587 38 10 43 77 154 190 120 117 0 135 138 206 1,228 pedi observation hours 3,474 3,634 114 155 191 149 276 244 382 239 89 121 223 79 2,262 icu observation hours 1,872 2,304 131 77 147 135 152 114 136 222 182 151 273 81 1,801 telemetry obsery hours 7,313 7,855 531 647 544 351 429 222 304 397 546 755 592 597 5,915 blood bank tests 25,484 24,671 3,055 2,102 2,262 2,502 2,263 2,053 2,554 2,114 2,100 2,075 2,260 2,101 27,441 lab tests 970,061 1,074,139 104,191 98,431 92,692 103,760 87,647 86,779 92,136 92,530 81,127 89,559 84,408 85,101 1,098,361 lab-send outs tests 25,200 21,294 2,183 1,979 2,050 2,282 1,952 2,151 2,114 2,184 1,864 2,075 2,160 1,998 24,992 diagnostic radiology tests 53,874 57,334 4,970 4,569 4,082 4,933 4,842 4,597 4,704 4,915 4,402 4,748 4,513 4,701 55,976 ultrasound tests 11,684 12,903 1,106 1,107 1,120 1,310 1,050 1,159 1,174 1,214 1,062 1,200 1,115 1,014 13,631 nuclear medicine tests 2,399 2,395 188 169 148 193 178 177 190 233 204 234 231 224 2,369 cat scan scans 8,646 9,462 836 799 786 889 746 814 853 842 765 864 849 869 9,912 mri scans 66 136 27 0 27 31 7 22 11 30 331 412 466 378 1,742 mammography tests 7,736 8,957 962 1,075 990 1,297 1,445 1,463 1,377 1,538 1,359 1,454 1,588 1,380 15,928 radiation therapy treatments 12,046 13,619 1,270 1,158 854 1,361 1,123 1,250 1,287 1,196 1,113 952 1,025 1,186 13,775 respiratory therapy treatments 22,397 22,962 1,567 1,431 1,213 1,896 2,097 1,711 2,131 1,896 1,683 1,714 1,503 1,842 20,684 physical therapy treatments 53,823 55,027 5,167 5,069 4,106 5,153 4,408 4,977 4,595 4,987 4,821 4,574 4,804 4,885 57,546 Occ.Therapy treatments 6,691 7,165 1,940 2,194 1,916 2,290 2,225 2,313 2,330 2,365 2,210 2,321 1,842 2,191 26,137 cardiac rehab treatments 3,991 6,033 275 218 223 377 348 468 501 512 441 529 496 468 4,856 ekg tests 11,990 14,319 1,226 1,137 1,144 1,245 1,256 1,184 1,186 1,190 1,194 1,296 1,261 1,198 14,517 eeg tests 321 280 34 31 31 44 29 31 45 34 38 46 27 34 424 speech therapy treatments 1,815 1,490 114 167 147 165 141 210 177 145 125 191 194 145 1,921 mVanasse Hangen Brusdin,Inc. Appendix > Patient Statistics > Parking Lot Occupancy Counts > Parking Lot Turnover Data w mp MR an 1171) Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Parking Requirements for Proposed Medical Office Building On a per-square-foot basis,parking requirements for medical office buildings are considerably higher than those for hospitals. Standalone facilities can require five to seven spaces per 1,000 square feet. However,facilities located on hospital campuses typically require less parking. Recent studies prepared by VHB for other community hospitals indicated parking space requirements for medical office buildings ranging from four to five spaces per 1,000 square feet. The ongoing feasibility study for proposed medical office building indicates that it may be as large as 35,000 square feet. Based on the typical range of four to five OR spaces per 1,000 square feet,the medical office building would require 140 to 175 spaces. For the purposes of this study,a midrange estimate of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet,or 158 parking spaces,is assumed. �w Required Parking Garage Capacity The proposed parking garage at Cooley Dickinson Hospital will need to accommodate the existing parking deficit,new parking demand associated with the proposed medical office building and hospital expansion,and any displaced by the proposed building projects. As described previously,the existing parking space deficit is 66 spaces and up to 370 spaces will be displaced by the new buildings and parking garage. The new parking demand associated with the hospital expansion and the new medical office building totals 334 spaces. In all,the required parking garage capacity is 770 spaces. Table 6 Required Parking Garage Capacity Existing Deficit 66 spaces Displaced Surface Parking Lot H(new surgery building) 173 spaces Lot A(internal circulation) 10 spaces Lot B(site of proposed garage 187 spaces Subtotal 370 spaces New Parking Demand Hospital Expansion 176spaces Medical Office Building 158 spaces Subtotal 334 spaces TOTAL 770 spaces o' 8 Future Parking Demand 08855ParldngRpf032304 tinal.doc IU Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. on 4 OR Future Parking Demand go In The proposed hospital expansion and new medical office building will increase parking demand at the hospital campus.The proposed parking garage will accommodate this increased parking demand,as well as the existing parking deficit and any surface parking displaced by the building program. This chapter presents the project-related parking demand and the required capacity of the proposed parking garage. Project-Related Parking Demand The proposed project consists of an 83,880 square foot expansion of the hospital and construction of a new 35,000 square foot medical office building. The existing hospital facilities total 396,000 square feet and there is no medical office building on the campus. ■ Parking Requirements for Proposed Hospital Expansion Community hospitals typically require two to three parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building space. Based on the observed peak parking occupancy of 840 cars, the existing parking ratio for the hospital is approximately 2.1 cars per 1,000 square feet. This is at the lower end of the typical range. ON For the purposes of estimating future parking demand,the existing parking ratio of 2.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet is appropriate to apply to the proposed hospital expansion. The primary component of the proposed hospital expansion is new surgical and patient bed space. As such the parking requirements would tend to be on the low end of the typical range of parking demand as compared to projects that involve more administrative or outpatient space. Based on a ratio of 2.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet,the proposed hospital expansion requires 176 spaces. 08855ParldngRpt032304 fnal,doc 7 Future Parking Demand IiiB Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table 4 Parking Turnover Summary(Mixed-use Spaces) Lot H Lot A Lot B Total Number of Spaces 230 128 187 545 Number of Cars 408 349 322 1,079 Average Duration(hours) 5.6 3.5 4.9 4.7 Average Turnover(cars/space) 1.8 2.8 1.7 2.0 Number of Cars parked 4 hours or less 156 249 170 575 Spaces used at 11:00 AM 7 33 44 84 s Number of Cars parked 5 or more hours 252 100 152 504 Spaces used at 11:00 AM 227 92 143 462 Notes: Parking turnover study conducted hourly on Wednesday,January 13,2004 from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Parking turnover study does not include spaces designated for specific types of parkers(oncology,physicians,etc.) ow Existing Parking Space Deficit The hospital currently has a parking deficit of at least 66 spaces. As shown in Table 5,there is an existing need for 875 spaces and an existing supply of 809 spaces. w The 66-space shortfall consists of extra cars observed during the January counts and parking that was unavailable for use by most drivers. The peak number of cars observed during the January counts exceeds the number of spaces by 31. Another 35 spaces are required to account for unused handicap permit parking spaces,snow loss,and restricted-use spaces that are fully used at some point during the day but not during the time of the campus-wide peak parking occupancy. Table 5 Existing Campus Parking Space Needs Observed Peak Parking Required Number Type of Parking Existing Parking Supply Occupancy" of Parking Spaces Regular 645 spaces 696 cars 696 spaces Handicap Permit Parking 41 spaces 28 cars 41 spaces Reserved' 123 spaces 116 cars 123 spaces 809 spaces 840 cars 860 spaces 15 spaces for snow loss 875 spaces Physicians,clergy,hospital vehicles,oncology,radiation therapy,rehabilitation,Cardio-Rehab,and blood donor. **During hour of campus-wide peak parking(11:00 am). Includes drivers searching for parking. elil■ 08855Par1dngP4A032304final.doc 6 Observed Parking Activity milli on MU Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. therapy patients etc.,each category of user space was fully occupied at some point during the day,but at no time were all the various types of restricted-use spaces at capacity at the same time. Lot H was the first of the three primary parking areas to reach capacity. The lot was three-quarters full by 7:00 am. By 8:00 am all of the spaces not reserved for patients were full. The patient spaces were full by 9:00 am and the parking remained full until after 2:00 pm. All but the farthest row of parking in Lot A was full by 8:00 am and the entire lot was full by 9:00 am. The lot remained full until 1:00 pm. Lot B was the last parking area to fill. It was full by 9:00 am,except for a few spaces being used by the valet parking service. These spaces were filled shortly thereafter. Lot B remained full until after 2:00 pm. Parking Turnover A parking turnover study was conducted on Tuesday January 13,2004 from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm of those spaces available to both patient/visitors and staff parkers in the three largest hospital parking lots. The location and last three digits of the license plate of each vehicle parked in the lots were recorded every hour. This provided data regarding the arrival time,departure time,and parking duration of each vehicle. The results of the turnover survey are summarized in Table 4 and the complete details are provided in the appendix. The turnover study results show that a slight majority of cars are parked four hours or less,but a substantial majority of the parking spaces are occupied by long-term parkers. During the campus-wide parking peak of 11:00 am,long-term packers occupied 462 of the 545 spaces(85%). Of note is the activity in the Lot H. At 11:00 am only seven of the 230 spaces were occupied by short-term parkers and almost all of the short-term parking activity in the lot took place during the afternoon once hospital staff starting to leave. OR W RM on 08855PaddngRpf032304final.doc 5 Observed Parking Activity ON Lii[.) Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 3 Observed Parking Activity PM Parking occupancy counts and turnover studies were conducted during January. on Hourly parking accumulation counts and parking turnover studies were conducted on Tuesday January 13,2004 from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Supplemental parking occupancy counts were conducted during the peak late-morning period on am Wednesday the 14"`and Thursday the 15"'to assess variation in day-of-the-week activity. +� * Patient care statistics indicate that January is one of the busiest months of the year at the Hospital. Accordingly,the parking activity observed during the January counts is assumed to be representative of seasonal peak parking activity. A listing of patient 00 care statistics for a 12-month period is provided in the appendix. Parking Occupancy Patterns The number of cars parked in each lot were recorded every hour throughout the day. Detailed tables showing parking lot accumulation by time of day and each lot are presented in the appendix. ON The data indicate that the parking accumulation of the entire campus parking system peaks at around 11:00 am and a consistently high level of demand occurs throughout PM most of the day. At the peak there were 840 cars parked or drivers searching for parking among the 809 available parking spaces. There were 800 or more cars parked every hour from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm. The parking problem was compounded by the loss of 15 spaces due to snow storage. Some of the overflow parking was accommodated by the parking valet service and those vehicles were parked in the aisles of Lot B or along the road between the Main Entrance and the MRI entrance. The remainder of the overflow parking occurred on dirt and landscaped areas,and at the end of parking aisles. All parking lots reached or exceeded capacity at some point during the day. w However,the handicap permit spaces were never fully occupied and not all of the other restricted-use spaces were occupied during the campus-wide peak hour of 11:00 am. Of the 41 handicap permit parking spaces,nevermore than 29 were parked. Among the spaces reserved for physicians,oncology patients,radiation 08855ParldngRpt032304 final.doc 4 Observed Parking Activity Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. OR Parking Supply Changes The proposed building program will displace some surface parking and this parking will need to be replaced as part of the proposed garage. In addition,the garage is to be located on the site of Lot B and the capacity of Lot B will need to be included in the sizing of the proposed parking garage. Table 3 summarizes the current estimate of likely impacts to the current parking supply. It is estimated that the building program will displace 370 surface parking spaces,including 187 at the site of the proposed garage and 10 to improve internal circulation near the proposed garage. Table 3 Estimated Parking Supply Changes Existing Future Parking Capacity Parking Capacity Change Lot H(new surgery building) 298 125 (173) Lot A(internal circulation) 182 172 (10) Lot B(site of proposed garage) 187 0 (187) Net Loss 370 spaces 4• 08855ParldngPpt032304 final,doc 3 Parking Supply g pp Y r-t� V- I" IF F t t I I I I I I I {r^... 6m w 60-W, 6now, P.•MB56.0UgMPgn&V&I"LQo Im M&PAV9 LOCATION SPACES LOCUST STREET-(ROUTE 9) LOT A 182 LOT B 187 LOT C 23 1 C LOT D 46 N LOT E 43 LOT F 10 LOT G 20 7 a n LOT H 298 fuLLLLUJ CANCER 'a*„ R HAB ,`,� . TOTAL= 809 VISITORS I ED WALK–IN AMBULATORY SURGERY ,....,, - it §z 40P G , . O ED AMBULANCEi MAIN 4 V P a � r Iu 9�CS�O�� O RECEIVING MR] i N A ro� B �Y O O P s 0 " ' t 5 Figure I Parking Location Map Cooley Dickinson Hospital f• Northampton,MA 0 60 120 Feat MBVanasse Hangen Brustfin,Inc. 2 Parking Supply Figure 1 depicts the parking at the Hospital. The parking is comprised of 809 designated parking spaces among eight parking lots. A detailed inventory of the parking supply is presented in the appendix. There is no fee for parking by patients,visitors or staff. Complimentary valet parking is provided at the hospital's Main Entrance. Visitor parking is available in the three large lots out front—A,B and H —and in Lot D (near the MRI). The majority of Lot H is used for staff parking. The closest spaces are reserved for patients,including some specific designations such as Radiation Therapy,Oncology,Rehabilitation,and Blood Donors. Lot A is shared by patients/visitors,staff and physicians. Physicians have designated parking along the rear of Lot A.Lot B is available for staff and patient/visitor parking. As shown in Table 2,approximately 20 percent of the parking at the Hospital is reserved for specific users. There 70 spaces reserved for physicians,clergy and hospital vehicles,and 53 spaces reserved for patients. Another 41 spaces are designated for handicap permit parking. Table 2 Parking Supply Type of Parking Total Parking Supply Regular 651 spaces Handicap Permit Parking 41 spaces Reserved-Patient 53 spaces Reserved-Other* 70 spaces 809 spaces *Physicians,clergy and hospital vehicles. 1111A 08855PaddngW032304 final.doc 2 Parkin Supply Parking pp Y ew M Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. am 1 Introduction OF Cooley Dickinson Hospital is a not-for-profit,acute-care community hospital that r+� provides a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services,as well as 24-hour emergency care. The Hospital recently completed a Campus and Facility Master Plan that includes a surgery/bed tower addition,expanded administrative and ! support space,and a medical office building. Table 1 lists the planned building program. Table 1 Building Program Proposed New/Expanded Existing Size Space Proposed Size Medical Office Building 35,000 sf 35,000 sf Expanded Hospital Facilities 396,000 sf 83,880 sf 479,880 sf 396,000 sf 118,880 sf 514,880 sf w Source:Cooley Dickinson Hospital—March 2004 This building program will displace some surface parking and will include construction of a parking garage. This report identifies the parking impacts of the proposed project and the required capacity of the proposed parking garage. w 08855PaddngWO32304 final.doc 1 Introduction am Il1U Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table of Contents W. 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................1 0w 2. Parking Supply....................................................................................................2 ParkingSupply Changes.......................................................................................3 am 3. Observed Parking Activity.................................................................................4 Parking Occupancy Patterns................................................................................................4 goParking Tumover..................................................................................................................5 Existing Parking Space Deficit..............................................................................................6 4. Future Parking Demand.....................................................................................7 MW Project-Related Parking Demand..........................................................................................7 Parking Requirements for Proposed Hospital Expansion........................................7 go Parking Requirements for Proposed Medical Office Building...................................8 Required Parking Garage Capacity.......................................................................................8 FM Tables and Figures Table No. Description Page 4. 1 Building Program................................................................................. 1 om2 Parking Supply....................................................................................2 3 Estimated Parking Supply Changes......................................................3 4 Parking Tumover Summary..................................................................6 5 Existing Campus Parking Space Needs................................................6 6 Required Parking Garage Capacity......................................................8 Figure No. Description Follows Page 1 Hospital Parking Lots...........................................................................2 08855ParkingP4A032304 final.doc ii Table of Contents Parking Study Cooley Dickinson Hospital Surgery Expansion and Medical Office B Prepared for Cooley Dickinson Hospital 30 Locust Street Northampton,Massachusetts 01061-5001 Prepared by VB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 505 E.Columbus Avenue Springfield,Massachusetts 01105 March 23,2004 W77 r""', F." Parking Study Cooley Dickinson Hospital Surg e ry Expansion and Medical Office B j Prepared for Cooley Dickinson Hospital 30 Locust Street Northampton,Massachusetts 01061-5001 Prepared by VM/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 505 E.Columbus Avenue Springfield,Massachusetts 01105 March 23,2004 Ii1L) Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Mitigation Due to the traffic volume growth expected by 2010 and the site generated project trips associated with the hospital expansion,the following mitigation measures are w proposed: Route 9 at Maple/North Maple Street-Efficiency at this intersection can be achieved by decreasing the signal cycle length from 85 to 60 seconds in both the morning and evening peak hours. Reduction of the cycle length is expected to reduce delay and vehicle queuing and benefit air quality. ww Route 9 at North Elm/Prospect Street/CDH Main Drive-To help facilitate regional growth along Route 9,and accommodate increased site traffic,signal timing and cycle length reduction(from 120 to 90 seconds) adjustments are recommended at this intersection. w PO WO \Mawald\checkin\08855\docs4eports\Trattic\08855 Final.doc 27 Traffic ttA MB Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table 2-6 Future Conditions Intersection Analysis Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Critical Movement Demands Delayz LOSS Demand Delay LOS Route 9 at Hospital Road 2004 Existing Hospital Road 25 29 D 50 27 D 2010 No-Build Hospital Road 25 38 E 50 38 E 2010 Build Hospital Road 35 40 E 35 40 E Route 9 at Elm Street 2004 Existing Elm Street L 10 28 D 15 66 F 2010 No-Build Elm Street L 10 36 E 15 105 F 2010 Build Elm Street L 10 45 E 15 >120 F Route 9 at Woodlawn Avenue 2004 Existing Woodlawn Avenue 70 13 B 180 17 C 2010 No-Build Woodlawn Avenue 75 14 B 190 22 C 2010 Build Woodlawn Avenue 80 14 B 195 23 C Route 9 at Denniston Place 2004 Existing Denniston Place 5 12 B 20 19 B 2010 No-Build Denniston Place 5 13 B 20 23 C 2010 Build4 Denniston Place 10 13 B 80 20 C Hospital Road at Elm Street 2004 Existing Hospital Road 20 10 B 70 12 B 2010 No-Build Hospital Road 20 10 B 70 12 B 2010 Build Hospital Road 30 11 B 95 13 B Signalized Intersections V/Cs Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS Route 9 at Maple Street/North Maple Street 2004 Existing Overall Intersection 0.61 41 D 0.58 27 C 2010 No-Build Overall Intersection 0.71 79 E 0.68 47 D 2010 Build Overall Intersection 0.75 19 B 0.71 16 B Route 9 at North Elm/Prospect Street/CDH Main Drive 2004 Existing Overall Intersection 0.65 34 C 0.84 44 D 2010 No-Build Overall Intersection 0.71 36 D 0.89 49 D 2010 Build Overall Intersection 0.73 33 C 0.85 42 D PM 1 Number of vehicles performing critical movement 2 Delay is expressed in seconds per vehicle 3 Level of Service 4 Delay improves under Build conditions based on the redistribution of existing parking due to the hospital expansion � 5 The Build analysis includes signal timing and cycle length adjustments 6 Volume to capacity ratio Pill \�nawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 26 Traffic in I111� Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. ■ Intersection Analysis Results Similar to existing conditions,the study area intersections were analyzed to determine performance measures such as average delay,volume-to-capacity ratios and level-of-service. Table 2-6 summarizes the results of this analysis. As the table shows,the proposed hospital expansion results in no substantial change at any study area intersection. The majority of the project impact is expected to occur along the hospital driveway approaches to Route 9. The existing conditions results are repeated in this table for comparison purposes. The new traffic volume generated by the proposed project is low and should not have a noticeable impact on traffic operations along Route 9. For the two signalized study area intersections,the Build analysis includes signal timing and signal cycle length adjustments to appropriately mitigate potential project impacts. Based on the 2010 No Build projections,these adjustments would be necessary regardless of the hospital expansion. The results of the unsignalized intersection analyses show that none of the study area intersections are expected to decrease in level of service. It should be noted that(due to the expected redistribution of existing trips)a slight decrease in delay could be expected at Denniston Place under Build conditions. It should also be noted that based on the existing traffic volumes at the intersection of Route 9 and Elm Street(currently operating at LOS F),this intersection meets the four-hour traffic signal warrant for signal installation. It is possible that a traffic signal at this intersection could be beneficial to safety and operations at this location. This intersection should be monitored in the future to determine whether signalization is desirable. on on \\mawald\cbeckin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 25 Traffic \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net dwg 3\5\2004 SQ Existing Signalized Intersection e ti 'nsr Qe4 y e m m Q � 3 to in in 60 I 5 ?s o �� o 45 3 rn Im ao �— l lS �r l► —225 S 4 r 460 015 v95 o L 20 Route 9 50 r 0 330 .� �► �—590 Route 9 (Main Street) 45 1 5-1 15 1 3051 515-0 525 1201 (Elm Street) 415—► u�0 0 605-110, o LO 575—� "'n N 695-4- 35 v n cc 15 a 35—� 0 w V .Q v �y m ca d Cooley-Dickinson Hospital HOSpi/a/ M w Lz5 Y r 195 25 185---► Figure 2-9 2010 Build Conditions Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net dwg 3\5\2004 QS Existing Signalized Intersection e ti 0sr QeG w 3 <A G ai m Q � 3 1 9 0 55 L 5 �o o Nh 20 u� v o to 255 LO W I-+—:395 ?p `► r4 F-210 —285 �—340 'r' 20 Route 9 1 r 40 r 15 �1 r 55 r 55 170 .� �► t—435 Route 9 (Main Street) 701 S� 1 51 51 S� 1 405--J 615 595 1751 (Elm Street) 680--► Ln in o 875—► o u� 850—♦ °,�,� o o °u°� 765 45-� N LO ao 20 N r- 40-� N r<o T Cl) G �O o 'a d Cooley-Dickinson Hospital HosAilai9 r r k—6o �► A-- 35 1 225—► Figure 2-8 2010 Build Conditions Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net dwg 3\5\2004 ® Existing Signalized Intersection xx New Project Generated Trips (+/-xx) Existing Trips Redistributed Due to Project e ti 0sr Qe � e m � 3 1 is Z � � 0 3° f—5 4 10 4 20 Le Route 9 20 5 r 5 10 5 4) 1 4--20 Route 9 (Main Street) 20—� S i s--► (-20)10—► S� ♦ 35 (-45)45 (� 60 (' 10 (Elm Street) 5� 00 15� I N LO o�o � 65--► r v N + v y : d Cooley-Dickinson Hospital c a y0SPi1a/ o u� j�► ►-5 5� Figure 2-7 Site Generated/Redistributed Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net dwg 3\5\2004 ® Existing Signalized Intersection xx New Project Generated Trips (+/-xx) Existing Trips Redistributed o� �`eeti Due to Project d 3 Q S` 3 � m c I v Z � 3 tih ♦-20(-15) 4 40 Ln Route 9 10 r 5(-15) ri 15 20(+15) (-15 50 Route 9 (Main Street) 20---1- S +15)10--0 �► (+15)5—► S ♦ �. 15 (+15) r' 10� r' S 1 (Elm Street) (-15)10--%* us LO 10 LO u, (+15)5 0 LM r c 0 r� N y a V _ lC Cn Cooley-Dickinson Hospital d HOSpifai o� �itey� W N 15� Figure 2-6 Site Generated/Redistributed Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale on B Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. PF Table 2-5 Trip Generation Morning Evening Trip Estimate Daily3 Peak Hour3 Peak Hour3 Medical Office Building Inbound 635 70 35 Outbound 635 15 95 Total 1,270 85 130 Hospital Inbound 735 65 35 Outbound 735 35 60 Total 1,470 100 95 Total Inbound 1,115 135 70 Outbound 1,115 50 155 Total 2,740 185 225 1. LUC 720—Medical Office Building—trips per 1,000 square feet 2. LUC 610—Hospital—trips per 1,000 square feet 3. Estimated trips rounded to the nearest 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment VHB conducted a detailed review of the access patterns to and from CDH. The vehicle-trips generated by the planned hospital expansion are assigned to the roadway network based on the existing access patterns to the hospital campus. The distribution of morning and evening peak hour hospital trips derived from this review are shown on Figures 2-6 and 2-7. Beyond the site driveways,these new trips were assigned to turning movements based on the existing patterns at the study area intersections. In addition to the distribution of new trips,some existing hospital trips were redistributed based on the reallocation of parking due to the project. The proposed project can be expected to relocate a number of employee parking spaces from the northwest side of the campus to the proposed parking garage adjacent to Denniston Place. This trip redistribution is also presented in Figures 2-6 and 2-7. ...................................._............................. ........................_....................-..........._.........._.........-.................................. Build Condition Traffic Volumes The new trips illustrated in Table 2-5 were added to the No-Build traffic networks and the existing site trips were redistributed due to the reallocation of parking. The resulting traffic networks represent the Build Condition peak hour traffic volumes and are shown in Figures 2-8 and 2-9. Traffic \\mawald\checkin\08855\does\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 20 c I11� Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 00 1�! Build Conditions Build conditions are developed by adding the traffic estimated for the proposed hospital expansion to the No-Build traffic networks. The methodology and resulting ` peak hour traffic volumes are described in the following sections. ...-.................................................._............. Methodology There are two components of developing the Build condition traffic networks,trip generation and trip distribution/assignment. Trip Generation Trip generation rates used for the proposed components of the hospital expansion were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual6. Land use codes(LUC) 720 (Medical Office Building)and 610(Hospital)were used for the separate components of the expansion. The average trip generation rates per 1,000 square feet of building area from LUC 720 were applied to the planned medical office building size of 35,000 square feet. The average trip generation rates per 1,000 square feet of building area from LUC 610 were applied to the planned hospital expansion of 83,880 square feet. The resulting trip generation is summarized in Table 2-5. As the table shows,2,740 daily trips can be expected as a result of the hospital expansion. These additional trips represent a daily traffic increase along Route 9 of about 20-25 percent. Approximately seven percent(185 trips)of the project-generated trips can be expected during the morning peak hour. Just over eight percent(225 trips)can be expected during the evening peak hour. 6 Tria Generation.7� Edition.Institute of Transportation Engineers,Washington D.C.2003. 19 Traffic \\mawald\6eckin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc c I \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\tigures\8855net dwg 2\23\2004 SQ Existing Signalized Intersection e ti 0,�F'i d Q � 3 1 � w to in 60 -5 po ��ryr^�0 45 m 3 rn w uO 14—575 LO in 14 700 jp �► ♦4 �---400 4-450 - —430 LO 20 Route 9 70 15 S r r 5 325 4) x-10 —570 Route 9 'J + l'S r 'J l► � � '` (Main Street) 45 t �' 51 ') (� 15 1 2701 515 425 1151 (Elm Street) v�0 0 590--P- v+ 585---P- N p "' r N 625—P 35� v n eo 10� N N 20� T � O w 4 C V C oa CO Cooley-Dickinson Hospital d HOSpi1a/ N!q Z� *�Ag5 201 185---► Figure 2-5 2010 No-Build Conditions Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphicsVigures\8855net dwg 2\23\2004 QS Existing Signalized Intersection 5 e � 3 I � v 0 0 0 55 5 �QO 43 20 20 0 3 v(o to +-245 0 Ln I-+-390 ?p `► i(� 4 220 -+-280 4 300 r-.Ln L Route 9 1 S 40 r 25 �1 S r40 r 20 �h155 *) � �385 Route 9 (Main Street) 70 't (► 5 J '1 (' 5 J 1 r► 390 645 585 I 170 (Elm Street) 660—�IoTlo-0 850-110- L+0 830--► 0 0 0 °LO ° 755 45 N in ao 25 r r 30 N r W) M r rte. y Aa d Cooley-Dickinson Hospital yOSpila/ 0 0 1�q5 �► A—' 20 225 Figure 2-4 2010 No-Build Conditions Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale i UM Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. regional traffic growth,three patterns need to be investigated-traffic destined to Northampton,traffic destined through Northampton via Route 9,and traffic destined through Northampton via Bridge Road. The least complex of these three, traffic growth destined to Northampton,can be accounted for in the growth rate estimated for the City(approximately one percent per year based on historical growth information and other recently completed studies). To gauge how much of the regional growth traveling through Northampton affects the project study area,VHB consulted the 2000 journey to work census data. These data show that approximately 80 percent of the traffic traveling through the City from the Hill Towns is destined to Interstate 1-91 (points south) or the communities of Hadley and Amherst. This traffic is likely to use Bridge Road to access the interstate and the Coolidge Bridge,rather than travel Route 9 through downtown � Northampton. The remaining 20 percent is destined directly south of Northampton and would use Route 9 and Route 5 to access the communities of Easthampton and Southampton. Since no major traffic productions or attractions are planned for the Northampton area,it can be assumed that future traffic growth would follow the same travel patterns. Based on this information,no additional regional growth of traffic volume is expected and applying a one percent annual growth rate to existing traffic volumes is sufficient to account for both local and regional growth. The data provided in the 2000 census is confirmed by data presented in the Northampton Transportation Plans. This data show that Route 9 currently carries approximately 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day(vpd)from the Williamsburg town line to Florence Street. Between Florence Street and Bridge Road,Route 9 carries 15,000 to 25,000 vpd. South of Bridge Road,Route 9 again carries between 10,000 and 15,000 vpd,indicating that a significant portion of traffic travels through the City using Bridge Road. Furthermore,according to the Plan,traffic along Route 9(at the to Williamsburg town line)is expected to grow at a rate of approximately 1.3 percent per year from 1997 to 2010. With some of this traffic growth using Bridge Road,a one percent annual growth rate along Route 9 is adequate. These future No-Build traffic volumes for the morning and evening peak hours are shown in Figures 2-4 and 2-5. PO _.._.._.._.. -------.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._._..----.._.._..-.._........y P..... 5 Northampton Transportation Plan,Pioneer Vallelanning Commission,November 2001 16 Traffic Final.doc IIL� Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. horizon is included in this section to present a conservative view of traffic operations after full build-out of the expanded facility. ■ No-Build Traffic Volumes and Roadway Improvements The analysis of future traffic conditions for the study area requires consideration of the anticipated growth around CDH,both in terms of nearby development projects, roadway improvement projects,and regional traffic volume growth. M The City of Northampton Office of Planning and Development was contacted regarding nearby development or roadway projects that may have a noticeable effect on traffic volumes or operations at the study area intersections. There are no projects in the vicinity of the study area that are anticipated to have an impact on traffic volume and operations. However,the City indicated it would be worthwhile to investigate the impacts that the proposed Full Build program for The Village at Hospital Hill'would have on traffic in the study area. According to information presented in the DEIR,approximately 11 percent of the total full build project trips (five percent of residential trips,12 percent of commercial trips)are expected to be generated to/from the west along Route 9. Table 2-4 summarizes the expected trip generation the project would attract to/from the west. The morning and evening peak hour trips generated by the Village at Hospital Hill have been considered in the 2010 No Build and Build analyses. Table 2-4 The Village at Hospital Hill Trip Summary—to/from Route 9 West' Commercial Residential Total Average Weekday Traffic 820 100 920 Weekday Moming Peak Hour: Enter 75 2 77 Exit 20 5 25 Total 95 7 102 Weekday Evening Peak Hour Enter 25 7 32 Exit 75 3 78 Total 100 10 110 1 Trip calculations are based on five percent of total residential trips and 12 percent of total commercial trips. Trip totals are as presented in the April 2003 Village at Hospital Hill DEIR. !�1 In terms of regional traffic volume growth,it is important to note that the communities surrounding Northampton(known locally as the Hill Towns)are growing at a faster rate than the City. Therefore,to provide an accurate estimate of 4 Village at Hospital Hill DEIR,EOEA#12629,Epsilon Associates,April 2003 \\mawald\checldn\08855\docs\teports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 15 Traffic Diu Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. FIR Table 2-3 Crash Summary(1999-2001) Route 9 at Maple/ Route 9 at North Elm Route 9 at Route 9 at North Maple Street Street/Prospect Street Elm Street Woodlawn Avenue Total Year 1999 2 6 5 2 15 2000 1 4 7 0 12 2001 5 4 5 0 14 Total 8 14 17 2 41 Collision Type Angle 5 3 5 0 13 Head-on 0 0 0 1 1 Rear-end 1 6 9 1 17 Unknown 2 5 3 0 10 Total 8 14 17 2 41 Severity Fatal Accident 0 0 1 0 1 Injury Accident 1 9 9 2 21 Property Only 7 5 7 0 19 t Total 8 14 17 2 41 Time of day 7:00 AM-9:00 AM 1 5 3 0 9 9:01 AM-3:59 PM 1 7 8 2 18 4:00 PM-6:00 PM 1 0 3 0 4 6:01 PM-6:59 AM 5 2 3 0 10 Total 8 14 17 2 41 Day of Week Monday-Friday 8 14 13 1 36 Saturday-Sunday 0 0 4 1 5 Total 8 14 17 2 41 Pavement Conditions Dry 6 11 15 2 34 Wet 2 2 2 0 6 Snowy 0 1 0 0 1 Total 8 14 17 2 41 OF MassHighway Crash Rates 047 0.74 1.04 0.12 Source:Compiled by VHB from data provided by MassHighway Future Conditions This section presents future No-Build traffic volumes,projected vehicle trip generation for the hospital expansion,future Build traffic volumes,and intersection analysis results under both the No-Build and Build conditions. A six-year planning ! \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 14 Traffic loll III I UMVanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. slightly higher than the statewide average. None of the intersections in the study area appear on the MassHighway High Crash Location report? The data show a high number of rear-end and injury crashes at two intersections- Route 9 at Prospect/North Elm Street and Route 9 at Elm Street. A vehicle collision diagram was completed to determine a potential cause for this higher number of collisions. The diagrams are included in the appendix to this report. The majority of collisions occurring at the intersection of Route 9 at Elm Street are rear end crashes in the eastbound direction. These crashes occur in daylight hours, under clear,dry conditions,indicating that weather is not a likely contributing factor in the number of crashes occurring. Due to the unsignalized nature of the intersection,there are two likely contributors to collisions at this location:either vehicles turning from Elm Street onto Route 9 are not waiting for adequate gaps in the traffic stream(causing eastbound traffic to stop short and be hit from behind),or vehicles turning right on to Elm Street are hit from behind by vehicles who do not adequately slow in time. This is further corroborated by higher than average crash rate at this location. The speed of vehicles along this stretch of Route 9 could be a cause of the high rate of injury accidents. There is also a great deal of eastbound traffic involved in collisions at the intersection of Route 9,North Elm Street,and Prospect Street. Again,the majority of these crashes occur during daylight hours under clear,dry conditions. As this intersection is signalized,a contributing cause could be an insufficient clearance phase at the intersection. 3 High Crash Location Report,MassHighway 2002 \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs4eports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 13 Traffic >I M Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. ..._....................._................._...................... .._..............................---__....................................................................... Intersection Analysis Results The existing conditions intersection analysis results are shown in Table 2-2 and discussed below. Table 2.2 Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Critical Movement Demands Delayz LOSS Demand Delay LOS Route 9 at Hospital Road Hospital Road 25 29 D 50 27 D Route 9 at Elm Street Elm Street L 10 28 D 15 66 F Route 9 at Woodlawn Avenue Woodlawn Avenue 70 13 B 180 17 C Route 9 at Denniston Place Denniston Place 5 12 B 20 19 B Hospital Road at Elm Street Hospital Road 20 10 B 70 12 B Signalized Intersection V/C4 Delay LOS Vic Delay LOS Route 9 at Maple Street/North Maple Street 0.61 41 D 0.58 27 C Route 9 at North Elm/Prospect Street/CDH Main Drive 0.65 34 C 0.84 44 D 1 Number of vehicles performing critical movement 2 Delay is expressed in seconds per vehicle 3 Level of Service 4 Volume to capacity ratio For unsignalized intersections,the analysis shows that only the intersection of Route 9 and Elm Street operates at an unacceptable level of service during the evening peak hour. Based on the methodology for analyzing unsignalized intersections(as described above),this LOS F represents the northbound left-turn movement out of Elm Street. All other movements at the intersection operate at an acceptable level of service. Both signalized intersections also currently operate at an acceptable level of service. ■ Safety To gain insight into the frequency of incidents along the study corridor,VHB reviewed the MassHighway crash database for the most recent available three-year period(1999-2001). These data report vehicle crashes with damage greater than $1,000 or personal injury occurrences,which can give a good indication of safety along the study corridor. As shown in Table 2-3,a total of 41 crashes occurred within the study area from 1999 through 2001. No accidents were reported at Denniston Place or Hospital Road. Based on the crash rates calculated,only the intersection of Route 9 at Elm Street exceeds the 2003 statewide average crash rate (for unsignalized intersections)of 0.66. The 2003 statewide average crash rate for signalized intersections is 0.87. Generally during 2003,crash rates within District 2 were \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 12 Traffic Po II1L Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. PIP ■ Intersection Capacity Analysis To identify how the six intersections in the study area currently operate,VHB conducted signalized and unsignalized intersection analyses as prescribed in the Highway Capacity Manual 2(HCM)published in 2000 by the Transportation Wn Research Board. The analysis was conducted using SYNCHRO 5.0 and HCS 2000 traffic analysis software. These analyses were conducted for both the morning and evening peak hours. ..._.............._....................................._........................................__._..................................... Intersection Analysis Procedures The procedure used to analyze the capacity of an intersection,as defined in the 2000 HCM,results in estimates of volume-to-capacity ratios,average delay per vehicle, and level-of-service. The volume-to-capacity ratio provides an estimate of the utilization of the available capacity. The average delay per vehicle provides an indication of the amount of time motorists must wait to travel through an intersection. Level-of-Service(LOS)is an intersection rating based on the average delay,ranging from"A" (best)to"F" (worst). LOS D or better is generally considered acceptable in urban areas. In general,LOS E and F indicate moderate to severe degrees of traffic congestion. The LOS Criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections are summarized in Table 2-1. For signalized intersections,LOS is determined for the intersection as a whole. For unsignalized intersections,LOS is determined for the movement with the longest delay,usually turns from the side street. Table 2-1 Level of Service Criteria PR Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Delay(seconds) Delay(seconds) A 0 to 10 seconds 0 to 10 seconds B 10 to 20 seconds 10 to 15 seconds C 20 to 35 seconds 15 to 25 seconds D 35 to 55 seconds 25 to 35 seconds E 55 to 80 seconds 35 to 50 seconds t F Greater than 80 seconds Greater than 50 seconds Source:2000 Highway Capacity Manual Exhibits 16.2 and 17-2 VIM PIN 2 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)Transport ation Research Board,Washington D.C.,2000 PIP \\mawald\checldn\08855\docs\reports\TralHC\08855 Final.doc 1 1 Traffic \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net.dwg 2\23\2004 ( Existing Signalized Intersection d Q � 3 � m 000 �55 �.5 ?mss / O 45 T 3 0)m LO 4-465 LO o ul 14 585 jo ► ♦(� 300 4 350 4-330 0 20 Route 9 4) 1 �►s r 65 4) � (.0. 4-15 4) (-10 s r 5 305 4) k .—460 Route 9 (Main Street) 451 1 �► 51 '1 151 4) 1 (► 2901 415--* � 435—fs r► 1101 (Elm Street) 345--0 ua m LO 515—► N N 510—0 25 Nu"',° "'� rm 560—► 35-� 10� 20� _ 0 w ,y C V Q v v 'a m d d Cooley-Dickinson Hospital Q Hose/�a/ Ln 1n N LO k—20 A--Ass 20J 175--► Figure 2-3 Existing Conditions Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale I \\mawald\checkin\08855\graphics\figures\8855net.dwg 2\23\2004 QS Existing Signalized Intersection v�F� A- d a S` 3 t m 50 5 6 d� rd 2p 3 °v LO LO ♦—205 to LO I�345 ?�O �► ♦4 4--185 4 245 �260 m° Route 9 1 S r 40 r25 4 S�► r40 20 145 20 Route 9 X340 (Main Street) 65 5 1 1 5, 370 535—► 415--► 160 (Elm Street) 550-10. LO o 730 0 v+0 710—► N o 0 LO � °� 645� 45 N LO i. 25 T T 30—i _ _o w _ CO Cooley-Dickinson Hospital a Hospira/ R,as T T1 Y r�s 20 210--► Figure 2-2 Existing Conditions Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Not to Scale FN Ilia Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Win ■ Traffic Volumes Both daily and peak hour traffic volume data were reviewed as part of this study. Automatic traffic recorder(ATR) counts were obtained from the Northampton Transportation Plan'. The Plan shows that Route 9 currently carries approximately 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day(vpd)south of Bridge Road. Peak period turning movement counts (TMCs)were conducted at the six study area intersections. The TMCs were conducted from 7:00 to 9:00 a.m.and from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.on Wednesday February 11,2004. The peak hours based on this turning movement count data are 8:00 to 9:00 a.m.and 4:00 to 5:00 p.m.. The peak hour turning movement volumes are shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-3. 1 Northampton Transportation Plan,Pioneer Valley Planning Commission,November 2001 \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 8 Traffic \\mawaldcheckin\088551graphics4iaures\8855map.dwg 2\23\2004 ® Signalized Study Area Intersection / • Unsignalized Study Area Intersection WO Cooley Dickinson Hospital Campus C Y Y q a tire. aa9e t ` m N `r ' � 1 ty � � � 5 No Meadow Street Barre 9 [ocpstS� x ------ m ttStr r _ o Denniston 'M1 Place r Il ,x n h9°ep F "N n 0 a 0 1000 2000 Feet LL Study Area Map Figure 2-1 Ill[) Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Route 9 (Locust Street)at North Elm Street, Prospect Street, and the CDH Main Driveway Route 9 meets North Elm Street,Prospect Street,and the main driveway of CDH to form a five-legged signalized intersection. Two lanes are provided on each approach to the intersection. In addition,Route 9 westbound provides an exclusive left-turn lane into the hospital. The traffic signal at this location allocates a protected phase for these left-turning vehicles. The Prospect Street approach is a one-way approach towards Route 9. Traffic destined to Prospect Street from Route 9 eastbound or the hospital must turn left just beyond the intersection at an unsignalized location. Route 9 at Denniston Place Denniston Place meets Route 9 to form a three-legged unsignalized intersection. Two lanes are provided along each Route 9 approach as the intersection tapers to/from a larger cross-section at North Elm and Prospect Streets. Denniston Place provides one general-purpose lane and is under STOP control. Route 9 (North Elm Street)at Elm e Street and Woodlawn Avenue Elm Street and Woodlawn Avenue meet Route 9 to form a"skewed"four-way rw intersection. To the west,Elm Street provides separate left and right-turn lanes onto Route 9. To the east,Woodlawn Avenue provides one general-purpose approach lane to Route 9. Both approaches to Route 9 are under STOP control. Route 9 provides one through/right-turn lane in each direction,as well as exclusive left-turn lanes onto both Elm Street and Woodlawn Avenue. Hospital Road at Elm Street Hospital Road meets Elm Street to form a traditional"T-type" intersection at the Pa back of the hospital. Elm Street is under STOP control and provides one general-purpose approach lane to Elm Street. Elm Street provides one travel lane in each direction. to \\maald\checkin\08855\dccs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 6 Traffic XM IiLJ Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. > Inventoried intersection geometry at the six study area intersections and observed traffic signal timing and phasing as appropriate; > Intersection capacity and level-of-service analyses;and > Safety analysis. These data and analyses are described in the sections below. ■ Study Area Roadways and Intersections Outside of the CDH campus,the traffic study focuses on one main roadway and six intersections,as described below. Figure 2-1 provides a study area intersection map. + ..........................................................................-.......................... _._._.._.._.._---.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._... Roadways Route 9 Route 9 is a major east west connector throughout the entire state of Massachusetts. In the Pioneer Valley Region,it is one of the few east/west roadways that provide access across the Connecticut River. In the vicinity of the Hospital,Route 9 is named Locust Street(north of CDH),North Elm Street(south of CDH),and Elm Street (south of Woodlawn Avenue). The roadway consists of a two and four-lane cross-section and provides a connection between Interstate 91 and Downtown Northampton and the communities of Florence,Williamsburg,and points west. In the northern section of the study area,as the community of Florence begins,Route 9 is named Main Street. Main Street provides a two-lane cross section through Florence. ._.._..___.._.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.___..-.__-.._.._.._.._.._.._.. Intersections Route 9(Main Street)at Maple Street and North Maple Street In Downtown Florence,Maple and North Maple Streets meet Route 9 to form a four-way signalized intersection. One general-purpose lane is provided in each direction. Parking is available along the Route 9 approaches to this intersection. Route 9(Locust Street)at Hospital Road The driveway to the northwest of the hospital property forms a three-way"T-type' intersection with Route 9. Route 9 provides one wide travel lane in each direction at this location as it tapers to/from a larger cross-section at North Elm and Prospect Streets. The driveway provides one general-purpose lane and is under STOP control. All movements are permitted to and from this driveway. \\mawald\checldn\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 5 Traffic w I11u Vanasse Hangen Brust in,Inc. 2 Traffic This chapter identifies the potential traffic impacts of the proposed hospital expansion. Three traffic scenarios are included in this study: > Existing(2004)Conditions, Wo > 2010 No-Build Conditions,and > 2010 Build Conditions. The existing conditions are based on geometric,traffic control,and traffic volume observations collected in February 2004. The 2010 conditions account for growth in traffic volumes,other nearby development projects(as defined by the City of Northampton),and planned roadway improvements. The potential impact of the hospital expansion can be identified by comparing the 2010 No-Build to the 2010 Build Conditions. The results of this analysis illustrate that the planned hospital to expansion has only a minor impact on traffic conditions in the study area. Traffic conditions are evaluated at six intersections as part of this study: 1. Route 9(Main Street)at Maple Street and North Maple Street 2. Route 9(Locust Street)at Hospital Road 3. Route 9(Locust Street)at North Elm Street,Prospect Street,and the Cooley Dickinson Hospital(CDH)Main Driveway 4. Route 9 at Denniston Place 5. Route 9(North Elm Street)at Elm Street and Woodlawn Avenue 6. Elm Street at Hospital Road Existing Conditions VHB prepared an assessment of existing traffic conditions within the study area,as summarized in the following sections. The following tasks were carried out to identify existing conditions within the study area: > Field reconnaissance visits; > Peak period turning movement counts from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM at the six intersections identified above; AA Traffic \\rnawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\TratSC\08855 Final.doTraffic t�. Ii11J Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Three different analysis conditions were reviewed for both the morning and evening peak hours. These scenarios include: ➢ Existing Conditions based on 2004 traffic volumes and existing roadway geometry and traffic control; ➢ 2010 No-Build Conditions including future regional growth and any planned roadway improvement or development;and ➢ 2010 Build Conditions which layer the new traffic generated by the proposed project onto the No-Build Conditions. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 185 trips in the morning peak hour and 225 trips in the evening peak hour. Comparing the 2010 No-Build to 2010 Build Conditions can identify the potential impact of the hospital expansion. The results of this analysis illustrate that the planned expansion has no significant impact on traffic conditions in the study area. The planned surgery/bed tower addition,medical office building,parking garage, and expanded administrative and support space does not result in a degradation of level-of-service at any of the study area intersections. \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc 3 Introduction \\mawald�checkin\08855\graph icsViaures\8855-Im.dwo �I J 9 5 a ------- ----- — � — r i b tr. IN 9 x a M, ]] 3 ,F 3K d --- -------- ----- ---- - ' ----- -- - � r u '3` $ 0 3500 7000 Feet - Locus Map Figure 1-1 Ii1L.) Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 11IR Introduction Cooley Dickinson Hospital (CDH)is planning to construct a surgery/bed tower addition,expanded administrative and support space,a medical office building (MOB),and a parking garage on their Northampton Campus as part of the Hospital's Master Plan. These facilities are necessary to meet the area's current and future patient care needs. This report identifies the potential traffic impacts of the hospital expansion. Table 1-1 presents the planned build program for the expansion. A site locus map is presented in Figure 1-1. Table 1-1 Proposed Expansion Land Use Proposed Square Footage Medical Office Building 35,000 Expanded Hospital Facilities 83,880 Total Expansion 118,880 Source:Cooley Dickinson Hospital-March 2004 This Impact Study assesses the existing traffic characteristics at the hospital and projects the future traffic demands that can be expected due to the expansion project. The traffic analysis looks at existing traffic conditions at nearby intersections, provides an estimate of traffic associated with the proposed Master Plan,and evaluates the future traffic conditions with and without the proposed expansion. Summary of Findings Traffic conditions are evaluated at six intersections as part of this study: 1. Route 9(Main Street)at Maple Street/North Maple Street 2. Route 9(Locust Street)at Hospital Road 3. Route 9(Locust Street)at North Elm/Prospect Street/ CDH Main Driveway 4. Route 9(North Elm Street)at Denniston Place 5. Route 9(North Elm Street) at Elm Street/Woodlawn Avenue 6. Elm Street at Hospital Road t Introduction \\mawald\checldn\08855\docs\reports\Trallic\08855 Final.doc 1 I11J� Vanasse Hangen Brustin,Inc. List of Tables Table 1-1 Proposed Expansion............................................................................................1 go Table 2-1 Level of Service Criteria....................................................................................11 Table 2-2 Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis.....................................................12 ps Table 2-3 Crash Summary (1999-2001).............................................................................14 Table 2-4 The Village at Hospital Hill Trip Summary...................................................15 Table2-5 Trip Generation..................................................................................................20 Om Table 2-6 Future Conditions Intersection Analysis........................................................26 List of Figures Figure1-1 Locus Map...........................................................................................................2 Figure2-1 Study Area Map.................................................................................................7 Figure 2-2 Existing Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................................9 Figure 2-3 Existing Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................10 Figure 2-4 2010 No Build Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...................................17 Figure 2-5 2010 No Build Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...................................18 Figure 2-6 Morning Peak Hour Site Generated Project Trips.......................................21 u� Figure 2-7 Evening Peak Hour Site Generated Project Trips........................................22 Figure 2-8 2010 Build Morning Peak Hour Traffic Volumes........................................23 Figure 2-9 2010 Build Evening Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.........................................24 \\mawald\checkin\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.dm 11 Table of Contents II]i) Vanasse Hangen Brust in,Inc. Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................1 Summaryof Findings.................................................................................................................1 2 Traffic..................................................................................................................................4 ExistingConditions....................................................................................................................4 Study Area Roadways and Intersections...................................................................5 TrafficVolumes..........................................................................................................8 �w Intersection Capacity Analysis.................................................................................11 Safety.......................................................................................................................12 FutureConditions....................................................................................................................14 No-Build Traffic Volumes and Roadway Improvements..........................................15 BuildConditions.......................................................................................................19 Intersection Analysis Results...................................................................................25 Mitigation.................................................................................................................................27 go \\mawald\cheeldn\08855\docs\reports\Traffic\08855 Final.doc i Table of Contents iro"s ir""s Tr affic Im act Study Oyb P Cooley Dickinson Hospital Expansion Loc' us 7:Q Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Cooley Dickinson Hospital Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared by VM/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Watertown,Massachusetts April 2004