Loading...
32A-255 (64) ` _ ^ accessible but are not directly interaccessible. To get from the lower two levels to the upper level , one would travel outside approximately forty (40 ' ) feet from the new south entrance to the Wiggins Tavern entrance and then take a new enclosed lift to the upper level . Also important would be the loss of eight (8) seats due to the installation of the lift plus a loss of four (4) seats due to the new south door brings the total seating from fifty-six (56) to forty-four (44) and imposes an economic hardship on The Hotel . Lift� $6, 500. 00 . $l ,000. 00 $1 ,000. 00 5,000. 00 ~ ' ' . ~ � In the case of the two new bathrooms, we were confronted with an existing concrete foundation stair and floor which was previously open to the exterior. (see before plans) We were unable to design a ramp or lift in the space aNangement shown in coniunction with two (2) accessible bathrooms without blocking legal use of the existing stairs and landing. We decided to ask The Board for a variance for the additional bathroom which we would be unable to build under section 30. 1 . We were able to design one handicapped bathroom accessible from the Justin Morgan function room by raising the floor of the new bathroom eight (8" ) inches, putting in a new doorway through a brick wall and installing a lift in the function room space. We felt the additional ~ fixtures would free use of all other toilets and generally improve the situation for all users. ance It is unfeasible to install two accessible bathrooms in the space given the existing conditions. Therefore, the cost of compliance in this case is irrelevant as there are no other practical locations to be considered. The true costs of compliance are loss of an amenity and an additional load on the existing fixtures. We and The Hotel feel the location of the present design is the only one feasible while best suited to the use of the spaces. it- In the case of the Coolidge Park Cafe accessibility , we were confronted with two interior levels and a third exterior patio level to connect. We designed an enclosure for the exterior patio level , and a ramp to connect it to the lower of the interior levels. We also designed a new exterior Cafe Park terrace with an accessible entrance into the existing interior lower level . We are requesting a variance to allow The Hotel not to connect by ramp or lift the middle with the upper level of the Coolidge Cafe. A ramp connecting the two levels would have to be 30 ' long and would result in loss of use of the middle level . A lift by necessity would have to be placed in the middle of the restaurant space, operation of which we feel , unfortunately, places the focus of attention by all in the space upon any user of the lift. We feel , and it may be a point of contention , that a handicapped person may feel more inclined to use less efficient means of access if given the choice of a more private , less obtrusive way. In our case, all levels of the Cafe are 8. For each variance requested, state in detail the reasons why compliance with the Board's regulations would not be practical. State the necessary cost of the work required to achieve compliance. (You should submit cost estimates detailing the amount of compliance) USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. Please see attached sheet. 9. Has a building permit been applied for? Yes, several permits If yes, state the date the permit was issued: 3/7/87 , 4/23/87 , 6/3/87 , 7/28/87 10. State the estimated cost of construction as stated on the building permit. (1) enclosing patio 57, 000 (2) center porch 54 ,000 . (3) ballroom enclosure 75 , 000 . (4) patio park 11, 500 . If a building permit has not been issued, state the anticipated construction cost: 11 . Has a certificate of occupancy been issued for the facility? If yes, state the date: Never revo iced 12. State the actual assessed valuation of the BUILDING ONLY AS RECORDED IN THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE of the municipality in which the building is located: $2 , 717 , 900 .-00 13. State the phase of design or construction of the facility as of the date of this application: 80% designed - 30% constructed 14. State the name and address of the architectural or engineering firm including the name of the individual architect or engineer responsible for preparing drawings of the facility: Metcalfe * Thorne , 150 Main St. , Northampton, MA 01060 - — Tristram W. Metcalfe III TEL: 5Rh_-,77r, (413) 15. State the name and address of the building inspector responsible for overseeing this project: William Nimohay, Buildihq Inspector City of Northampton. 210 Main StrPP±� Northampton, MA 01060 PLEASE NOTE: The Board may, in its discretion, hold a hearing on your application for variance. The BuaLd may also decide your application without a hearing, upon the information you submit. You should therefore, include all relevant information with your application. At minimum, the plans should include a site plan, all floor plans, elevations, sections and details. Photographs are Extremely helpful. Date: 11117 SIGN)TURE OF OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT f --- TEVr-N PLEASE PRINT OWNER/AGENT'S NAME d7 Awcaec-ve 61�ce 0,19Wo .alcy cxJ�?��Gy2L�C�CGxaL cX�cCPiJS �%�G�C7� Michael S. Dukakis �,7� Governor .��liurCan lace - ✓Corn,,. /3/0 Charles V. Barry 0artan, ✓&jjadzzaeiZ OV OS . Secretary (1697) 727-M610 Voice & TDD APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE In accordance with M.G.L. , Chapter 22, Section 13A, I hereby apply for modification of . or substitution for the rules and regulations of the Architectural Access Board as they apply to the facility described below on the grounds that literal compliance with the Board requlations is impracticable in my case. 1. State the names and address of the owner of the building/facility: Hotel Northampton Operative Cooperation, 36 Kinq Streeter Northamptnn, Massachusetts 01060 2. State the name and address or other identification of the building/facility: Hotel Northampton, 36 King Street, Northampton, MA 01060 3. Describe the facility: (number of floors, type of functions, etc.): Hotel : Five stories and basement; assembly, residential, restaurants 4. Check the work performed or to be performed: X New construction X Reconstruction, Alteration, __..._. Remodeling X Addition Change of Use 5. Briefly describe the extent and nature of the work performed or to be performed: Enclosed porches on existing foundations, updated handicap access new bathrooms, new 12ark 6. State each section of the Rules and Regulations of the Architectural Access Board for which a variance is being requested. SECTION NUMBER DESCRIPTION 3 . 3B Com]21Pte a cessihilitV 30:1 Public toilet accessibility 17 . 2 Ramps connPnti ng 1 eyrel s -in YPSta17YaT'1t Michael S.'Dukakis Governor •r one �Wt& �o9a dace - Rawn Charles V. „m "" �o !►r.,✓l ta,,e Z 02 08 Secrete �-� . (6'97J 7.27 0660 41988 TO: LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTOR MASSACHUSETTS INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM LOCAL HANDICAPPED COMMISSION FROM: DEBORAH RYAN , ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD SUBJECTi Hotel Northampton, 36 King Street , Northampton, MA 01060 DATE: December 30,1987 Enclosed please find the following materf_.ml regarding the above premises : : Application for Variance Decision of Board Notice of Hearing Correspondence _Letter of Meeting The purpose of this memo is to inquire as to whether or not your office has any input on the application filed with respect to the above project. Also, to make you aware that a hearing has been or will be held on the matter. If you have any information that you feel would assist the Board in making a decision on this case, could you please advise this office as soon as possible. You may call the office at (617) 727-0660 or submit a letter of recommendations and/or comments . Thank you for your interest in this matter.