32C-202 (9) Zoning Board of Appeals - _ 'City of Northampton
Hearing No.: ZBA-2006-0034 Date: June 23, 2006
1, Carolyn Misch,as agent to the Zoning Board of Appeals,certify that this is a true and accurate decision made by the Zoning Board
Administrator and certify that a copy of this and all plans have been filed with the Board and the City Clerk on
June 23,2006
i certify that a copy of this decision has been mailed to the Owner and Applicant.
C'64tiL41 AWLUI L
The appeal period for residential findings granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Administrator are thirty(30)days from the date
of the decision. All appeals are heard by the full Zoning Board of Appeals.
GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates, Inc.
31c- 20 ">
Zoning Board of Appeals _ City of Northampton
Hearing No.: ZBA-2006-0034 Date: June 23, 2006
APPLICATION TYPE: SUBMISSION DATE:
Residential Finding Thu May 25, 2006
Applicant's Name: Owner's Name:
NAME: NAME:
HAYMAKER ELIZABETH& HAYMAKER ELIZABETH&
ADDRESS: ADDRESS:
KIRSTEN K RYBCZYNSKI KIRSTEN K RYBCZYNSKI
85 Williams St 85 Williams St
TOWN: STATE: ZIPCODE: TOWN: STATE: ZIPCODE:
NORTHAMPTON MA 01060 NORTHAMPTON MA 01060
PHONE NO.: FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: FAX NO.:
EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS:
Site Information:
Work Location.:
I 4;, SITE ZONING:
a� T -- URC
TOWN: SECTION OF BYLAW:
)O
NORTHAMPTON,MA 01060 Section 9.3(1 D
GIS# MAP: BLOCK: LOT: ACTION TAKEN:
6649 .��C 202 .' 001 Grant
Reason for filing:
Attach screened porch.
HARDSHIP:
1'
FINDINGS:
The designated Zoning Administrator granted the Finding based on the materials and graphics submitted with the application and:
The Findings of the Board Administrator under Section 9.3 for the addition of a porch to an existing single family house related to the
side yard setbacks were as follows:
1. The Administrator found that the change would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing
nonconforming structure on the lot.
2. The Administator found that the home would not extend any closer to any front,side, or rear property boundary than the current
zoning allows and that the pre-existing structure already extends.
3. The Administrator also determined that the new construction would not create any new violation of other zoning provisions;and does
not involve a sign.
COULD NOT DEROGATE BECAUSE:
FILING DEADLINE: MAILING DATE: HEARING CONTINUED DATE: DECISION DRAFT BY: APPEAL DATE:
Tue May 23, 2006 Sat Jun 17,2006 Thu Jul 06, 2006
REFERRALS IN DATE: HEARING DEADLINE DATE: HEARING CLOSE DAME: FINAL SIGNING BY: APPEAL DEADLINE:
Sat Jun 10,2006 Sat Jul 29,2006 Thu Jun 22,2006 Thu Jul 06, 2006 Sun Jul 23,2006
FIRST ADVERTISING DATE: HEARING DATE: VOTING DATE: DECISION DATE:
Thu Jun 08, 2006 Thu Jun 22,2006 Thu Jun 22,2006 Fri Jun 23, 2006
SECOND ADVERTISING DATE: HEARING TIME: VOTING DEADLINE: DECISION DEADLINE:
Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:00 PM SatAug 19, 2006 Sat Sep 02,2006
MEMBERS PRESENT: VOTE:
David Bloomberg votes to Grant
MOTION MADE BY: SECONDED BY: VOTE COUNT: DECISION:
David Bloomberg 1' Approved
MINUTES OF MEETING:
Available in the Office of Planning&Development.
GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc.