Loading...
06-006 a 1 1 p\.J 3 D- ' eoce,-1)\oe adder( —..... M. . W 'N I . 1 I _____________----------7--- ] rri I I I I I I I I I d I I I 1 I 1 11 I fi v All nil ill ' Hi i j 1 1 . , e 0 / 4- 53 a I <- as' ---'7 i -- 33' / I / I J III /1 / I \-) N ' . #,47) , g 5 41 /k--1--- /-0:-.. 1 E / H t on x , 70 (\rf) r-rn 6 . I am concerned with the impact an antique shop will have on the environment. The property will not reflect the variance and the only indication of a business will be a very discreet, period appropriate sign handcrafted in wood. There will not be outside displays. The character of the property will retain it' s country flavor. The layout and design will be done with the assistance of an interior decorator. I estimate approximately one-third of my business will be drop-in and the rest will come via present contacts in the antique business and by appointment. It is for this reason that I do not expect traffic to be a problem. Only high quality items will be carried - no junk. I will be dealing mostly with small col- lectibles and vintage clothing. I would also like to provide an outlet for high quality locally handcrafted items. If anything, my business will emphasize how out of context the Mass . Electric Co. is and it would ultimately add to the communities identity by emphasizing it' s heritage. 7. The structure consists of a large old 10 room farm house plus large outbuildings which can not possibly serve the purpose they were intended for in the first place which was as a farm. In order to continue to utilize the property as it was intended - as living and work space - a small home business would fit in best with the character of the property. A country antique shop will blend in nicely with the surrounding environment. , cam ,. /I rin _,_MAYpiz_ 8ICM DEPT.OF BM use'.' NORTHAMM' r • The property in question is zoned residential I want to live on the premises and open an antique shop. I have a purchase agreement with the present owners contingent upon my obtaining a variance for the property. The following is a list of reasons upon which this application. is based. 1. The owners do not have the means nor the desire to stop the progressive deterioration of the barn. The roof leaks extensively and the North side has sunk and needs to be jacked up. Portions of the back of the house are not insulated. 4iany of the windows in the barn are either broken or completely gone . I want to buy the property and renovate both the house and barn. However both buildings require extensive work. In order to afford to buy the property, make the improvements and manage the upkeep, I need to have my own small business on the property. 2 . The ,lass. Electric Co . property borders the North side of this Property and includes ar office building, a large parking lot and tall glaring lights which illuminate their service vehicles. This property is zoned special industry. 3 . This particular portion. of Route 9 is not highly populated and there are only a few abutters within three hundred feet. 4. :1;ithin a short distance on either side of the property are many small businesses , ie . iass. Electric Co . , Girl Scout Offices , Lennox Fuel Co. , ^lorence Fool Co. , Beaver Brook Golf Club, A renovators supply and at one time a Move Co. and an Auction. Barn . 5. There is room for ample parking and the grounds will be upgraded by landscaping. MAY 18 1983 ;AAL _� I DEPT.OF BUILDING INSET 7,-'; '> NORTHAMPTON 1A Ul C' 11. List of Abutters: / Assessor's Map A)aAn, �� Co. 545 /latidenda.c,s e 2d., Leedi, 14a Sheet �° Pja�el 2. Saint. AwujA.. Cemetzuty 6 8 aohn. and Ca w.Line 486 /lajdenvJJ1 W., Leeds 6 7 3. 4 Sizutkui, §en,tiucde 509 /laadenvJJJ 2 L, Leech, A)a 6 11c?12 aohn Same 6 /3 5. 6. 7 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) .,--i;,:f,_F,r S Application Number: g - • -,'d. B.I. decked Filed Fee Pd. Rec'd. ZBA Map(s) Parcel(s) '11 D.i •• { Date Date Amt. Date By Date DEPT.Of BUILDING',INSt NTIONS NnR'MAMPTON,MA.010G0 A EBY MADE TO THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: 1. Name of Applicant 2anean Anne. S ,onn-CeL.C.i.. Address 220 Linileed Road, Wea. iYa4LeLd, Ma.. 01088 2. Owner of Property Jecia lead n (wi.th Beloite.d. C -eLL.i. and 2o4.eph C eL.Li.J Address 49 ?ed4 rd DJLLve, 3Loaence Ma. ii 3. Applicant is: DOwner; [n Contract Purchaser; ❑Lessee; DTenant in Possession. - 4. Application is made for: X VARIANCE from the provisions of Section 5.2 page 5-7 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Northampton. ❑SPECIAL PERMIT under the provisions of Section page of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Northampton. DOTHER: — - 5. Location of Property 502 ifaidenvL.LLe Road, Leeds, Ma. 01060 being situated on the Wept side of fingdenv.iJIP Street; anO shown on the Assessors' Maps, Sheet No. 6 , Parcel(s) lJ 6. Zone S. R. . 7. Description of proposed work and/or use; r ?e�.tvfce the at tacAe.d Dann and open an ani i/Ice �.Ao p 8. (a) Sketch plan attached; ®Yes D No (b) Site plan: DAttched DNot Required 9. Set forth reasons upon which application is based: l e.aile ilee at-tacked 4h.ee-t. 10. Abutters (see instructions; list on reverse side of form). 12. I hereby certify that information contained herein is true • the best of my knowledge. I a - 6z/6P.� � � • Date Applicant's gnaure .-- _ _- 'l • 1 / V . -2- since she is not the property owner. William Brandt voted to deny the petition. Since the vote was not unanimous, the application is hereby denied. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. on June 20, 1983. ROBERT C. BUSCHER, CHAIRMAN fLi .,,..... 1..._,..... Loc_iLa ,L....67 DR. PETER LAS AND WILLIAM BRANDT AUG 1 91983 Li L 0EPT.!? BIM DING IKP S ,f,;/ o Ciik. NNW clip . R DECISION OF THE ,/,wry,: f ' \: ! ' NORTHAMPTON BOARD OF APPEALS a W y ,. At , Northampton Board of Appeals meeting held on June 20, 1983, the i iON3oni rJanean Strong-Cifarelli for a Variance to use property located at 502 Hayd:` le Road for the sale of antiques was denied due to a split { Li LiL,--- ._.. - - .T_.. '...4 o he Board. DOT.OF SU!LOIN 1',?" I we lliA PTOH,MA.0 060 ,h, - resent and voting were Chairman Robert C. Buscher, William Brandt, and Dr. Peter Laband. Based upon the evidence presented to the Board, the Board made the follow- ing findings in regard to the petition for a Variance: 1. Chairman Robert C. Buscher found: A. that the applicant did not meet the Variance requirements on hardship due to the fact that the property was already being put to its "highest" use, namely residential and any hardship suffered by the applicant would be self-imposed since she was not the owner of the property; B. that the proposed use would generate additional traffic on an already heavily travelled road and this would be a detriment to the public good; and C. that the property zoned Suburban-Residence abuts a Special Industrial Zone, but the cutoff point must occur somewhere and it is the responsibility of the Board to prevent erosion of residential zones. Chairman Buscher voted to deny the Variance. 2. Dr. Peter Laband found: A. that the property is unique because it abuts the Massachusetts Electric property which is zoned Special Industrial and is one parcel removed from Hampshire Engineering; B. that a literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would create a hardship for the petitioners in that the sale of the property now owned by the applicant's in-laws is contingent upon receipt of the Variance, without which the applicant cannot afford to retain the property in the family; and C. that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent of the Ordinance since the proposed use would have little impact on the neighborhood, provided the antique business is confined to the barn area. Dr. Peter Laband voted to grant the Variance subject to the aforementioned restriction . 3. William Brandt found: A. that the property is unique because of the size of the barn on the premises, but a literal enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would not create a hardship for the petitioner r