Loading...
32C-221 (4) 7 BMP #1 Catch basins w /deep sumps 0.25 x 1 = 25% TSS Removed BMP #2 Infiltration Trenches 0.25 x (1 -0.25) = 18.75% TSS Removed BMP #3 Vortex Manholes 0.80 x (.75 - 0.1875) = 45% TSS Removed Total Removal Rate = 25% + 18.75% + 45% = 88.75% TSS Removal Rate ""' This combination of components will provide a minimum TSS removal rate of greater than 80 %, which meets the requirements of the Policy. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (Standard #8) No siltation barriers shall be required at this site with the exception of filter fabric liners under each catch basin grate. As each catch basin is installed, a layer of geotextile filter fabric shall be placed under the grate. All catch basin sumps shall be thoroughly cleaned after completion of construction. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (Standard #9) It shall be the responsibility of the owner (Alan Verson or subsequent owners) to maintain the stormwater management system. All required maintenance work and repairs shall be provided by the owners or their agents. Maintenance Schedule 1. Street Sweeping should take place in early Spring, after all snow and ice have melted. All collected sweepings must be disposed off site in conformance with all applicable regulations. 2. Catch Basins should be cleaned annually. Accumulated debris and sediment must be removed and properly disposed as with the street sweepings. 3. Detention Basin Inspection should be done on a monthly basis or after all significant rainfall events. The main components to be inspected are the outlet structures (CB #4 & #5). Debris may accumulate over the grates causing unnecessary surcharging in the basin. Any debris should be removed from within the detention basin to prevent re- occurrence of the problem. Accumulated sediments must be removed from the bottom of the detention basins. Snow plow operators must be instructed not to plow snow into the detention basins which will plug up the outlet grates and could cause flooding during heavy winter rainstorms. James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street Easthampton, MA 01027 6 k = Coefficient of Permeability, Ft /Min. Q = Flow Rate, CF /Min. Q = 0.0002 Ft/Min. x 1.0 x 227 SF = 0.045 CF /Min. = 2.72 CF /Hr. • = 65 CF /Day Trench Capacity: 9 SF leaching surface /LF trench x 110 LF* = 990 SF 990 SF x 0.0002 Ft/Min. = 0.2 CF /Min. = 12 CF /Hr. = 285 CF /Day Leaching Capacity * 40 LF trench in front basin + 70 LF trench in rear basin The permeability factor used in the above calculation is very conservative in that it only reflects the type "C" soils on the site. The Amostown- Windsor urban land complex soils do contain mixes of type "A" soils, which, if encountered, will greatly improve the infiltration capacities of the system. At 65 CF /day for the dry well and 285 CF /Day for the infiltration trenches, the total infiltration will equal 350 CF during a 24 hour rainfall event, which shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of Standard # 3 (196 CF per Storm). STORMWATER QUALITY (Standard #4) - The proposed drainage system shall include several components which shall remove suspended solids. The first component of the system will be the maintenance of the parking areas which will include keeping the pavement swept and the catch basins clean. Next will be the deep sump catch basins with hoods, which shall discharge into the detention basins with infiltration trenches in the bottom. From there, stormwater will flow into the final treatment system, two vortex style drainage manholes. The deep sump catch basins are credited for a 25% removal rate. The infiltration trenches, normally credited for a removal rate of 75 -80% removal rate, will be evaluated at a lesser rate (25 %) due to a lack of pre- treatment by a fore bay. The physical limitations of the site preclude the use of forebays. However, the vortex manholes will remove up to 80% of sand and over 95% of oil and grease. The vortex type water quality manholes have been proven to meet the mandated removal rates and have been accepted throughout the state for this purpose. The maintenance program could receive credit for a 10% removal rate, however, the other system components will be sufficient to meet the requirements James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street Easthampton, MA 01027 5 Since only a small portion of the site shall continue to drain onto the abutting property in the Post - development condition, there will be a decrease in flooding impact on the abutting property (northerly) during the 100 year storm event. The projected increase in flow rate for the 100 year storm is only 1 cfs, which will be mitigated by the proposed system. RECHARGE TO GROUNDWATER (Standard 113) "' This standard requires that 0.10" of runoff times the total impervious area be recharged back into the groundwater. The total impervious area of this development is 0.54 acre, therefore, a total of 196 cubic feet of rainfall must be infiltrated. This volume will be provided by two methods: 1) roof runoff from the rear half of the building will be retained in a leaching catch basin/dry well, and 2) runoff flowing into the two detention •p basins shall enter an infiltration trench in the bottom of each basin. The roof leaders from the rear of the proposed building shall be connected to a dry """' well 6'6" in diameter by 6' deep with 24" of stone surrounding the precast concrete structures. The infiltration trenches shall consist of 3' wide x 3' deep trenches filled with crushed stone. Details have been provided on the site plans. Total Volume of Stormwater Required to be Recharged = 196 CF per Storm o Leaching Capacity of Dry Well: Precast Concrete Leaching Basin (LCB): 6'6" Diameter x 6' Deep Stone Thickness: 24" Around + 12" Under Precast Structure Effective Leaching Diameter: 10'6" Effective Leaching Depth: 7' LCB Leaching Capacity: Leaching Surface Area: Bottom 86 SF x 50% effectiveness = 43 SF Sidewall 230 SF x 80% effectiveness = 184 SF Effective Leaching Area = 227 SF Soil Permeability (Amostown/Windsor Silty Substrate): k = 0.0002 Ft/Min. Using Darcy's Equation: Q = kIA op. A = Leaching Surface Area, SF I = Hydraulic Gradient (assume = 1.0) James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street „�, Easthampton, MA 01027 4 MO Standard #6: Protection of Critical Areas This site does not contain "critical areas ", as defined under the guidelines, therefore is Not Applicable. Standard #7: Redevelopment Project OPP Although this was, previously, a fully developed site, this project will not be considered a Redevelopment Project since the previous building had been demolished a number years ago. Standard #8: Erosion and Sedimentation Controls No wetland resource areas have been identified on this site, therefore, no erosion control barriers have been specified on the attached drawings. However, all catch basin inlets shall be protected with a layer of filter fabric laid under the grate until the final site grading and paving has been completed. Standard #9: Operation & Maintenance An operation and maintenance plan has been provided in this report. PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER (Standard #2) The following chart illustrates the peak flow rates generated for the 2 year, 10 year, and 100 year storms. The post development flow rates listed below reflect the flows generated without taking into account the detention properties of the two basins nor the infiltration which will take place in the infiltration trenches and the leaching catch basin. The pre- and post- peak flow rates were calculated based on a design point of DI #8. 2 Year 10 Year 100 Year Pre - Development 1 cfs 2 cfs 3 cfs '"'"` Post - Development 2 cfs 2 cfs 4 cfs Each of the two detention basins shall provide approximately 250 cubic feet of storage below the top of the outlet structure. With such small drainage areas, the TR55 program is ineffective in computing the required detention basin volumes, therefore, an moi estimation of the increase in time of concentration for the two drainage areas (Post 1 & Post 2) as a method of evaluating the function of each detention basin. Each basin shall receive flows of 1 cfs or less for the 2 and 10 year events. At this flow rate, the time of concentration for each basin will be increased by a minimum of 0.07 hours. This additional time will double the t for Post 1 and increase the t for Post 2 by 41%. Increased times of concentration of this magnitude will reduce the peak flow rates to well below the Pre - development rates. James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street O ,, Easthampton, M4 01027 3 to remove the TSS load. Each detention basin shall contain approximately 250 CF of storage volume below the outlet structure inlet. Flow then enters the vortex type drain manholes which are rated for a TSS removal rate of 80 %. The proposed catch basins in the system will all have 4' sumps with oil and grease removal hoods. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POLICY As mandated by the Massachusetts DEP Stormwater Management Policy, the following standards have been met by the proposed stormwater system. Standard #1: Untreated Stormwater No untreated stormwater shall be discharged by conveyances into wetlands or waters. Stormwater flows from the developed site shall pass through treatment measures before discharging into the brick tunnel from which the Market Street Brook eventually discharges. Standard #2: Post - Development Peak Flow Rates The stormwater collection system in this project shall be channeled into two detention basins which shall collect excess flows and discharge them at or below Pre - Development flow rates. Detailed calculations are attached to this report. Standard #3: Recharge to Groundwater The developed portion of this site is underlain with "C" soils. The recharge requirements for "C" soils under the guidelines requires that 0.10 inches of runoff times the total impervious area shall be recharged back to the groundwater. This requirement shall be met by utilizing infiltration trenches in the bottom of the detention basins and a leaching catch basin into which the roof drainage from the rear half of the proposed building shall be piped. Standard #4: 80% Total SS Removal The required TSS removal to meet this standard shall be accomplished by utilizing deep sump catch basins with hoods, infiltration trenches in each detention basin, and two vortex type drainage manholes. A program of regular drainage system maintenance shall be instituted in order to minimize the amount of suspended solids from entering the system. Standard #5: Higher Potential Pollutant Loads This site does not contain land uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads, therefore is Not Applicable. James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street �,. Easthampton, MA 01027 2 POST - DEVELOPED CONDITIONS: The proposed work shall include the construction of a new commercial building with associated parking, sidewalks, and driveways, as shown on the previously mentioned "Site Grading & Utilities Plan ". The developed site drainage area was divided into three drainage subareas: Post 1, Post 2, and Post 3. Post 1 includes the parking lot in front of the building, the two driveway entrances O from Hawley Street, a driveway at the south end of the building, landscaping and sidewalks in front of the building, and a landscaped depression along Hawley Street to be used for stormwater detention. Flow from the parking lot enters two catch basins (CB #1 & #2) which discharge into the northerly end of the detention area near Hawley Street. After the storage volume in the bottom of the detention area is filled, water flows into another catch basin (CB #5) at the southerly end. Flow is then piped into a vortex type drainage manhole (DMH #2) which removes suspended solids at a highly efficient rate before emptying into the final manhole over the brick tunnel (DI #8). Post 2 includes the building roof area, the parking lot on the north side of the building, sidewalk and landscaped areas abutting the north end of the building, the grass area along the southerly and westerly property lines, and grassed depression at the northwest corner of the property to be used for stormwater detention. The building roof OM drains will be piped directly into two catch basins: LCB #1, at the rear corner of the building, and CB #3, in the northerly parking area. CB #3 will also collect surface runoff ,04 from the northerly parking area before discharging into the detention area. Detained flows will exit the detention area through a catch basin (CB #4) then enter another vortex type drain manhole (DMH #3) and empty into the brick tunnel at the first drain manhole (DI #7). LCB #1 will collect roof drainage as well as overland flow from a grass swale at the southwest corner of the building. If the flow rate into LCB #1 exceeds the infiltration rate of the soils, excess flows will continue along the grass swale and into the detention basin. Post 3 consists of the grassed slopes along the northerly property line(s). Runoff will follow the property line in a grassed swale before flowing over the abutting property and into the existing catch basin north of the subject parcel. Flow will continue through the brick tunnel and on to the second drainage manhole (DI #8), the design point. In the post - developed condition, the drainage area into this basin will be reduced from 0.94 acres to 0.1 acres, therefore, no adverse impacts will be created on the abutting property due to the proposed development. J a i The two stormwater detention basins shall include infiltration trenches along the bottom of each basin. The surface of the trenches shall be rip rap stone which shall help James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street oul Easthampton, MA 01027 OP STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POLICY NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING HAWLEY STREET NORTHAMPTON, MA EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing parcel consists of an open lot located in the middle of a fully developed urban area. It is located between Hawley Street to the east and the Boston & Maine railroad right -of -way to the west. The lot was formerly occupied by a large . building, most likely used for manufacturing purposes, which has since been demolished. The lot has been vacant for several years. The site vegetation is predominantly limited to a sparse growth of low brush, weeds, and saplings. One very large maple growing along the property line will remain undisturbed. The site slopes from south to north, parallel to Hawley Street, and, except for a small portion along the southerly end, the lot is several feet lower than the road. The site soils have been identified as Amostown - Windsor silty substratum - Urban land complex, which is a mix of "C" soils and "A" soils. Since this site has been historically disturbed and compacted, an assumption was made that a majority of the surface soils would fall into the "C" category and all stormwater runoff calculations have been based on this premise. NO The pre - development stormwater runoff calculations have been based on a single drainage area totaling 0.94 acres. The TR55 stormwater modeling program was used to "" compute peak flow rates. The flow path used in determining the time of concentration begins with overland flow from the southeast corner of the property, across the lot in a northerly direction, across the property line and into an existing catch basin approximately 100' onto the abutting property. This catch basin empties, through a 10" concrete pipe, into an existing brick tunnel carrying the Market Street Brook. The tunnel flows in a southerly direction across the subject parcel at a slope of 0.8 %. An existing drain manhole (DI #8), located over the brick tunnel approximately 15' from the southerly property line, was used as the design point in comparing pre- development and post- ""' development flows. The pre - development and post - development conditions have been illustrated on a plan entitled "Site Grading & Utilities Plan", prepared by William A. Canon, Landscape Architect, Sheet L2, dated March 1, 1999. James A. Gracia, PE 99 Glendale Street Easthampton, M4 01027 on Standard #5: Higher potential pollutant loads (See plan L Z ) Tig, The project site does / does (. ircle one) contain Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads. If site contains such land uses. describe: ❑ If applicable, BMPs selected for controlling stormwater in these areas are designed to prevent infiltration of untreated stormwater and include: poo mm Standard #6: Protection of critical areas (See plan L Z ) lir The project site does / doe not . rcle one) contain critical areas with sensitive resources. If site contains critical areas. describe: ❑ If applicable, BMPs selected for stormwater discharges in these areas include: w Standard #7: Redevelopment project's (See plan LL ) The proposed activity is / . not ircle one) a redevelopment project. in Note: Components of redevelopment projects which plan ro develop previously undeveloped sites do not fall under the scope of Standard 7. Cl If the project is a redevelopment project. the following stormwater management standards have been met: NO ❑ The standards' which have not been met include: lila ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or expanded stormwater controls. ' Standard #8: Erosion/sediment control (See plan 2.Z ) j°t Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion. control sediment - movement.and stabilize exposed soils. - No Standard #9: Operation/maintenance plan (See plan L 2 ) An operation and maintenance plan for both construction and post- development stormwater controls has been developed. The plan includes BMP oviter(s): panics responsible for operation and maintenance: schedule for inspection and maintenance: murine and non - routine maintenance tasks; and provision for appropriate access and maintenance easements surrounding control(s) and extending to public right -of -way_ 5 e'er 1?7/9eV/62' ` *9 e,er9 ion ppm I attest under the penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents, accompanying this certification statement; and that I . - am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the project � � ,, ` G applicant. w 1�. James A. Gracia, PE 31 3 99 ( ) • Name Print Date St. .�� e 5/, _ 00 Stormwater Management Form This form is intended to ensure that proposed stormwater control designs meet the stormwater management standards described in the Department of Environmental Protection's Stormwater Management Policy (November 1996). The Depart- .* mem of Environmental Protection (DEP) recommends that applicants submit this form with the Notice of Intent, as well as supporting documentation and plans, to provide stormwater information for conservation con:mission review If a panicu- lar stormwater management standard cannot be met, information should be provided to demonstrate how adequate water quality and water quantity protection will be provided by the project. DEP encourages engineers to use this forn: to cenifv that the project meets the stormwater management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. This form should be completed by checking the appropriate boxes for each standard and by signing and stamping the back of this fonm. Non Project Location: Hawley Street, Northampton NMI ❑ The proposed project is/ no ' ircle one) exempt from one or more of the stormwater management standards. If project is exempt, explain why: Stormwater runoff volumes to be treated for water quality are based on the following calculations: (check one that applies) As •❑ 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of post - development site for critical areas (e.g. Outstanding Resource Waters and shellfish growing areas) Er 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious area of post - development site for other resource areas on • Standard #1: Untreated stormwater (See plan L 2' ) The project is designed so that new stormwater conveyances (outfalls /discharges) do not discharge untreated stormwater into. or cause erosion to. wetlands or waters. itsi Standard #2: Post - development peak discharge rates (See plan LL ) Post - development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre - development rates on the site either at the point of discharge or downgracljent property boundary. ❑ N /A: project site contains waters subject to tidal action. so standard is not applicable. Stormwater controls have been designed for the 2 -year and 10 -year. 24 -hour storms. X ' The project's stormwater design will not increase flooding impacts offsite from the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm. me Standard #3: Recharge to groundwater (See plan L Z ) 0 The annual groundwater recharge for the post- development site approximates annual recharge from existing site conditions. g Soil types have been identified according to either the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Count Soils Survey or onsite soil evaluation. Calculations on stormwater flow are based on a soil hydrologic group of C , and total impervious area of Q 5'4 A C . (square feet). 14 Soil types at each planned point of stormwater runoff infiltration include: 41 )1 0 5701 , . , +.v- AbAdP 11 2 »A)b Co rvl PL. E.e • Infiltration Best Management Practices (BMPs) used for this project include: j DILL/ TA/ FJLTiei4 T/e4✓ T.�G�/ffi�E5 Standard #4: 80% TSS removal (See plan L Z ) g The proposed stormwater management systems will remove 80% of the post - development site's average annual load of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). g The BMPs selected for this project include (list BMPs with TSS removal rates): see ,4 779e4/ ,4'4 4 T7 ✓E (11/96) rw MO sewage disposal facilities water supply facilities B -8. Existing & proposed: landscaping, trees and plantings (size & type of plantings) stone walls, buffers and/or fencing: B -9. Signs - existing and proposed: Location dimensions/height color and illumination B -10. Provisions for refuse removal, with facilities for screening of refuse when appropriate: om FOR MAJOR PROJECTS ONLY: pia B -11. An erosion control plan and other measures taken to protect natural resources & water supplies: e Silt fences, hay bales and filter fabric will all be used to protect water and natural resources. C. Estimated daily and peak hour vehicles trips generated by the proposed use, traffic patterns for vehicles and pedestrians showing adequate access to and from the site an de uate ehh ar. d pedestrian circulation within the site. See traffic impact study b y F uss an O ieii, traffic consulting engineers. OM • .w Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared and stamped by a: Registered Architect, Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer WO 4011 9 we SITE PLAN REQUIREMENT'S ous REQUEST FOR WAIVERS APPLICA'T'ION The application MUST include a site plan containing the information listed below. The Planning Board NO may waive the submission of any of the required information, if the Applicant submits this form with a written explanation on why a waiver would be appropriate. To request a waiver on any required information, circle the item number and fill in the reason for the request. Use additional sheets if amo necessary. A. Locus plan NO B. Site plan(s) at a scale of 1 " =40' or greater B -1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of project, date and scale plans: B -2. Plan showing Location and boundaries of: the lot adjacent streets or ways all properties and owners within 300 feet go all zoning districts within 300 feet - B-3. Existing and proposed: - buildings - setbacks from property lines - building elevations out - all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans for all exterior facades structures are encouraged) +� B -4. Present & proposed use of : the land - buildings: B -5. Existing and proposed topography (for intermediate projects the permit granting authority may accept P P Po i�a h PY( P J P g g ty Y t P generalized topography instead of requiring contour lines): - at two foot contour intervals !tw showing wetlands, streams, surface water bodies showing drainage swales and floodplains: - showing unique natural land features B -6. Location of: parking & loading areas - public & private ways + driveways, walkways - access & egress points proposed surfacing: vie B -7. Location and description of: all stormwater drainage /detention facilities water quality structures public & private utilities /easements 8 !wir l f:xplain ho%■ the requested use will pronune City planning objectives to the extent possible and will not adversely effect those objectives, defined in City master study plans (Open Space and Recreation Plan; Northampton State 1lospttal Rezoning Plan; and Downtown Northampton: Today, Tomorrow and the Future) The project will put an attractive and productive building on a vacant, weed— infested lot in the middle of a fully developed neighborhood with similar uses. It will not conflict with any planning objectives wi of the City. 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned owner(s) grant the Plannkng Board permission to enter the property to review this application. Date: C Cce Applicant's Signature: 4� l"l.k_ ik ,'AIL. Date: - - %' Owner's Signature: `If not the same as applicant's)) Tom Fitch, for Rugg Lumber Co. MAJOR PROJECTS MUST ALSO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING MAJOR PROJECT APPROVAL Po 4 Does the project incorporate X foot sumps into the storm water control system? Yes X No '"' (IF NO, explain why) Will the project discharge stormwater into the City's storm drainage system? Yes X No (IF NO, answer the following:) Do the drainage calculations submitted demonstrate that the project has been designed so that there is no "O increase in peak flows from pre- to post - development conditions during the: 1, 2, or 10 year Soil Conservation Service design storm ? Yes X No n (IF NO, explain why) Will all the runoff from a 4/10 inch rainstorm (first flush) be detained on -site for an average of 6 hours? Yes X No wei (IF NO, explain why) Is the applicant requesting a reduction in the parking requirements? " ' " x Yes No If yes, what steps have been taken to reduce the need for parking, and number of trips per day? 7 wa MO MO f low does the project meet the special requirements? (Use additional sheets if necessary) F. State how the project meets the following technical performance standards: Curb cuts are minimized: two curb cuts are requested. Check off all that apply to the project: use of a common driveway for access to more than one business x use of an existing side street use of a looped service road 2. Does the project require more than one drivewav cut? NO x YES (if yes, explain why) Improve safety of traffic cirrn1ation and emergency vehicle access. me 3. Are pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic separated on -site? x YES NO (if no, explain why) to the extent possible. FOR PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE INTERMEDIATE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, ONLY , SIGN APPLICATION AND END HERE. 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned owner(s) grant Planning Board permission to enter the property to review this um application. • Date: Applicant's Signature: "" Date: Owner's Signature: (If not the same as applicant's) FOR PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE A SPECIAL PERMIT OR WHICH ARE A MAJOR PROJECT, applicants MUST also complete the following: F. Explain why the requested use will: not unduly impair the integrity or character of the district or adjoining zones: The use is ccc pletely catible with the existing cammercial uses on the westerly side of Hawley Street and will "'"t fit in with the neighborhood. �h The project will have 45% open space. not be detrimental to the health, morals or general welfare: The project will add necessary office and commercial space to the economic base in the City. be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance: It is in harmony with w� the i ntent of having special industrial uses in this location. 6 • aw B. How will the requested use promote the convenience and safety of pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets? A pedestrian walk is provided from Hawley Street. The travel lanes in the parking area are adequate for cars and pedestrians. mie How will the project minimize traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area? The project will not have a substantial impact on traffic. See attached traffic study by Fuss & O'Neil, traffic engineers. Where is the location of driveway openings in relation to traffic and adjacent streets? See site plan. A second driveway /curb cut is requested to allow a separate entrance and exit, which will improve safety of traffic circulation. What features have been incorporated into the design to allow for: access by emergency vehicles: There will be separate entrance and exit and easy access to 3 sides of the building. eta the safe and convenient arrangement of parking and loading spaces: Parking lot is large and separated into two sections. provisions for persons with disabilities: The parking area and building complies with handicapped requirements. C. How will the proposed use promote a harmonious relationship of structures and open spaces to: the natural landscape: The project will have 45 percent open space, and also be attractively landscaped. - pm to existing buildings: The architectural design will be compatible with the existing neighborhood. other community assets in the area: The project will complement and add to the neighborhood. D. What measures are being taken that show the use will not overload the City's resources, including: water supply and distribution system: Water consumption will be minimal. Me sanitary sewage and storm water collection and treatment systems: See stormwater management plan and site plan. fire protection, streets and schools: No substantial impact. How will the proposed project mitigate any adverse impacts on the City's resources, as listed above? See stormwater management plan. ueu E. List the section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance that states what special regulations are required for the proposed project (flag lot, common drive, lot size averaging, etc.) +�* None . 5 Fie ATTACHMENT TO PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR 97 HAWLEY STREET Nmo 1. and 2. A Special Permit for Site Plan Approval is requested pursuant to Sec. 10.11. Special Permits are also requested for the following potential uses in the building, pursuant to the sections cited: • business offices, not to exceed percentage of the building allowed by the - ordinance; Sec. 5.2, pg. 5 -8. • repair service; Sec. 5.2, pg. 5 -8. so • construction supply; Sec. 5.2, pg. 5 -10. Approval is also requested pursuant to Sec. 8.9(6), pg. 8 -5, for a second driveway /curb cut to allow a separate entrance to and exit from the parking area. no 8.A. Sound and sight buffers. Pursuant to Sec. 6.5(1)(B), it is requested that Site Plan Approval allow for a 10 -foot MN reduction in the buffer strip on the northerly side of the project that abuts a residential zone. A sight- impervious fence exists on the property line, and additional planting will be put in the buffer strip. IR ON pm - CITY OF NORTHAMPTON su PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR: 1. Type of Project: X SITE PLAN APPROVAL : Intermediate Project (Site Plan) X Major Project (Site Plan Special Permit) OR X SPECIAL PERMIT: SEE ATTACHED 1 Project (with Site Plan Approval) ! Major Project (Site Plan Special Permit ) 2. Permit is requested under Zoning Ordinance: Section: Page: - w 3. Applicant's Name: Alan Verson en Address: 56 Main St. , Northampton, MA 01060 Telephone: 586 -1348 4. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # 32C Parcel # 221 Zoning District: SI Street Address: 97 Hawley Street 5. Status of Applicant: Owner ; Contract Purchaser X ; Lessee Other ; (explain) _ sos Rugg Lumber Co. 6. Property Owner: _ Address: 66 Newton St. , Greenfield, MA 01301 Telephone: 773 -3661 7. Describe Proposed Work/Project: (Use additional sheets if necessary): A 12,000 square foot, 2 -story commercial /office building is proposed, along with a 40 -car parking lot and associated landscaping. as Has the following information been included in the application? Site/Plot Plan X List of requested waivers Fee x Signed/Denied Zoning Permit Application X 8. Site Plan and Special Permit Approval Criteria. (If any permit criteria does not apply, explain why) Use additional sheets if necessary. Assistance for completing this information is available through so the Office of Planning & Development. A. How will the requested use protect adjoining premises against seriously detrimental uses? The building will be attractively designed and finished in an architectural style that is compatible with the neighborhood, will be set hack from the street, and will be nicely landscaped. ws How will the project provide for: surface water drainage: See stormwater management plan and calculations in attached Aw report by James Gracia, P.E., aryl provisions for drainage csi site plans. sound and sight buffers: See attached. _ The building will not interfere the preservation of views. light and air: with views, light or air. 4 me File # MP -1999 -0094 APPLICANT /CONTACT PERSON VERSON ALAN ADDRESS/PHONE 56 MAIN ST 586 -1348 PROPERTY LOCATION HAWLEY ST MAP 32C PARCEL 221 ZONE SI THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY: PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST ENCLOSED REQUIRED DATE • 0111.G FO • a LED OUT Fee Paid 4., • . Building Permit Filled out Fee Paid M! Typeof Construction: CONSTRUCT 12,000 SF,2 STORY COMM OFFICE BLDG & 40 CAR PARKING LOT New Construction Non Structural interior renovations sis Addition to Existing Accessory Structure Building Plans Included: wr Owner/ Statement or License 3 sets of Plans / Plot Plan >� vl � /�/ l ' -C THE FOLLOWING ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN ON THIS APPLICATION: 7a. >/ Approved as presented/based on information presented. ( r 55" c1�� 0-5 lc tai 75 `` Vie GI 5 L'a ' ^0/a 1 C 4(r 5 b L 4 as resented: --- n >, C r \ / ; r s p - ( CJ �N0 1 15,1an(C iq (/ Special Permit and/or Site Plan Required under: § [ 10.1( 5 ' w 5 c u5 y nPdii Cc. I IPA c' t /,-/ PLANNING BOARD ZONING BOARD ) / Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed begt '< o r I r'90 I of a 1 Finding Required under: § w /ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS �ulP( U / S r;✓,y ✓ncl.�n 5 9( c <( J,(( Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed � re cvs� a' °' ' 'sec AJ L'`I S Variance Required under: § w /ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed „• Other Permits Required: Curb Cut from DPW Water Availability Sewer Availability Septic Approval Board of Health Well Water Potability Board of Health Petf ut d +' °' •' x. OflUSSibt Signature of Btu • g • 11. Date Note: Issuance of a Zoning permit does not relieve a applicant's burden to comply with all zoning requirements and obtain all required permits from Board of Health, Conservation Commission, Department of public works and other applicable permit granting authorities. ar MO 1 0 Do any signs exist on the property? YES NO IF YES, describe size, type and location: Are there any proposed changes to or additions of signs intended for the property? YES x NO rsr IF YES, describe size, type and location: Building directory sian wi h ; nt _rnal ; 1 1 nmi nati on; ; parking lot entrance and exit; ng G� ---isgna- atir 11. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE COMPLETED, or PERMIT CAN BE DENIED DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION. This col. to bo fill.cd in as by the building Dcpnrtmont 'Required Existing Proposed By Zoning Lot size 43,015 s.f. 43,015 s.f. Frontage 207 207 d G Setbacks - front -- 100 0 / 0 - side L: -- R: -- L: 40 R: 58 : rear -- 20 Building height -- 1720 Bldg Square footage -- 12,000 © • • %Open Space: MIMP (Lot area minus bldg 48% 011 &paved parking) t �� # of - Parking Spaces �' .. 40 • #' of Loading Docks none r. Fill: -- 1750 c.y. approx. volume - -& location) northerly side 13. Certification: 1 hereby certify that the information contained herein G is I �true and accurate to the best of my kn edge. •e DATE:__ 1 1 Rq APPLICANT 's SIGNATURE - __ NOTE: Issuanoe of n n a zoning permit does not relieve ems burden to oompty wftb ,ail zoning requirements and obtain ail required wP __ S req q permits from the Board of Health, Coinservtation Commission, Department of Publics Work and other applioable permit granting authorities. • FI r F, f i.7 if MAR 4 i AP 77 File No ,FPT t F l aw r�, seic Tir,EyS ' " M ' Nt & ^.�-n' NING PER1 I T APPLICATION ( §10.2 ) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION .r 1. Name of Applicant: Alan Verson Address: 56 Main Street, Northampton, MA Telephone: 586 -1348 2. Owner of Property: Rugg Lumber Co. Address:66 Newton St., Greenfield, MA Telephone: 413- 773 -3661- 3. Status of Applicant: Owner x Contract Purchaser Lessee Other (explain): 4. Job Location: Hawley Street "+ Parcel Id: Zoning Map# 3 ✓' Parcel# 6 District(s): (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT) 5. Existing Use of Structure/Property vacant lot !!" 6. Description of Proposed UseNVork/Project/Occupation: (Use additional sheets if necessary): Construct 12,000 square foot, twe -story commerdial office building for uses allowed by right or planning board approval in S.I. zone, and 40 -car parking lot. 7. Attached Plans: Sketch Plan x Site Plan x Engineered/Surveyed Plans Answers to the following 2 questions may be obtained by checking with the Building Dept or Planning Department Files. w . 8. Has a Special Permit/Variance/Finding ever been issued for /on the site? NO DONT KNOW x YES IF YES, date issued IF YES: Was the permit recorded at the Registry of Deeds? NO DONT KNOW YES IF YES: enter Book Page and /or Document # 9. Does the site contain a brook, body of water or wetlands? NO DON'T KNOW YES x (underground brook) IF YES, has a permit been or need to be obtained from the Conservation Commission? Needs to be obtained x Obtained , date issued: Request For Determination to be filed. (FORM CONTINUES ON OTHER SIDE) • • m 7 1 1 1 I • V 1 .., ... ' . . \ . k • fNCI I ti � � . �`1 00 , d ltil0.TNlf EN!RANCI ^: l' ' - 4 15 ( -ARS — -- - - , 1 4 u IJIRF - FY L? - _ I SIC / !' , is � - ;�... V,. [NNt��GG r Y � ! � r\u } iF ` I t r C ...r9 �_ z..,.._, �`_^ \/ . .. • • _ PRICA 1 • . .. 1 PARCEL. AREA: 43,015 SL. >, `vovx� ry 25 l.ARS a tN Fk E SITE P 'VP EE k lfiM1¢ , Ri� HAWPEY STREET ` -... 4114:- .-......' .. ....... ..... T COMME • OFFICE BUILDING - - u Sf \N1FA - w __._ rl EIAb1�LEl' ST REET C ; A \ () N NORTHAMPTON, 1ASSACHUSETTS PAST ERn1 AVFN33 (111V \ER 013 Al AN \PRSI)N n a m.115111111 1111111 1 .„ . . , .'- . -.- , # , ' '' . ...„..r2 ' , _.i.,. + 1 _ ' - - -- Ail,' ' i _ ..., 4 . ,.- : LI ,. ,-*3.,, ...r.i..4....;-,----..- 1--, i ''''' ^ 1 ',.. I/ ■ ' ; 1 ' ' , •,' '-' -.. ' ' _ ' --- "' ... . .-, " - : - - "( .!' ' ":!** , - ! 14," „, ji! ■ -..„1 _ , ,.„ ., .... ,,,,,,,,,,,, - '''' 44 ''4 .r''' ' 4' 4 ' ' 4 4e ' ' ' ''''4 ' ' ' --* V i l' '' 1 - i '' - ' '4-- - -"- i ' '1 1 1 1 111' ' ', .`; ; ,!. :47 U4,ft . ,;,:: i f 01 ' ' '•i 44 - "I- " ' " . ' ,1 4 ) , . • „ ' ' H '''' •',' „• t - 1_, - _I ;- - `,... - ....--- '''' --- ' - -- ' ' :' r.- ,,:.Y ...7, • ... ,,,, I l' ''''" i -. . i -r . ' •• -- • --- — t -, - , '''' ±.' _ --- , 1.,10,...1 11 , ar., ,5 •,!,,:..t 1 .,;, ,par„,...Nt . r...."'"' , . -,,., .. • ' ' ' '''. , ' ' ' ' r r ' , - 7 .(' . ' . \ ■ r ' p , - - 1r .7..4.. i ' 1 ----.., .,, ra,.. '* "e ..„ .' - ';',:-- .1 ,..:si .' ":„..: ....- E.,1 P' :1 , I ' • _..n7.7— , . IR , _ . .,, , - .:..! --- - , ,::,..,■ .... --, -- -- , , - ,,,,, 4: ,, rql = '' . -.7.77., ' ","-, le ,.. -" ' ',! , ,q't - ' ,,,--- -. - - , ,.... . ... - „.,_ . 1 ,,„_ ..i, • - 1 . , , • '' " ' - ' ' --- --vol'i4 ".,-- '.. ' ` -- --'• 4 -- ,, ,..... ,-,...:_,.. ; , COMMERCIAL. OFFICE BUILDING HAWLEY STREET ( \ \ ( ) \ NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS .......„, .„„ .. . ..,.. . . . _-- ()%v" nEvitol At AN. VER`,()s. , .,.. . .. , . „ .. . S ,—,........ ,t CS'