Loading...
Re RE 7 Pleasant Street IPM.Note Re: RE: 7 Pleasant Street Re: Louis Hasbrouck Mark NeJame Louis Hasbrouck SMTP mark_nejame@verizon.net RE: 7 Pleasant Street EX /O=MAIN/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LHASBROUCK EX /O=MAIN/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LHASBROUCK Received: from city.northampton.ma.us (192.168.1.198) by EXCHANGE.main.city.northampton.ma.us (192.168.1.195) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.436.0; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:11:23 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1302898280-018037085b17bcd0001-3Uhmxj Received: from gwa4.webcontrolcenter.com (gw4.webcontrolcenter.com [63.134.207.19]) by city.northampton.ma.us with ESMTP id jYC1GZUICwksGIAD; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:11:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: mark_nejame@verizon.net X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 63.134.207.19 Received: from maila26.webcontrolcenter.com (unverified [216.119.106.50]) by gwa4.webcontrolcenter.com (SurgeMail 3.9c) with ESMTP id 228640885-1777420 for multiple; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:11:20 -0700 X-Barracuda-BBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.119.106.50 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.119.106.50 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by maila26.webcontrolcenter.com with SMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:10:45 -0700 Received: from vms229.mailsrvcs.net ([unknown] [192.168.1.2]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LJP00LGLMPVSEP1@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:10:43 -0500 (CDT) X-Barracuda-BWL-IP: 206.46.173.9 X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 206.46.173.9 X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: 206.46.173.9 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 206.46.173.9 Received: from 70.17.159.241 ([70.17.159.241]) by vms229.mailsrvcs.net (Verizon Webmail) with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:10:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:10:43 -0500 From: Mark NeJame <mark_nejame@verizon.net> To: lhasbrouck@northamptonma.gov CC: feliciaac63@comcast.net, dwasiuk@northamptonma.gov, lkent@lnn-law.com Message-ID: <8032443.278329.1302898243164.JavaMail.root@vms229.mailsrvcs.net> Subject: Re: RE: 7 Pleasant Street MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: RE: 7 Pleasant Street Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-X-Originating-IP: [70.17.159.241] X-Originating-IP: 216.119.106.50 X-Barracuda-Connect: gw4.webcontrolcenter.com[63.134.207.19] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1302898280 X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.1.198:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at northampton.ma.us X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_NONELEMENT_40_50, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, MIME_HTML_ONLY X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.60956 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email 0.00 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.00 HTML_NONELEMENT_40_50 BODY: 40% to 50% of HTML elements are non-standard 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Return-Path: mark_nejame@verizon.net Mark NeJame SMTP mark_nejame@verizon.net feliciaac63@comcast.net; Daniel Wasiuk; lkent@lnn-law.com Louis Hasbrouck RE: 7 Pleasant Street Would you please forward a copy of the engineer's report as soon as possible. Apparently the owner has a copy but Ms. Criscuolo does not. We would appreciate the same as soon as possible. Attorney Mark NeJame NeJame & Kling Law Offices 90 Conz St., Suite 208 Northampton, MA 01060 Tel. 413 584 2675 Fax 413 315 5270 Apr 5, 2011 06:58:41 PM, lhasbrouck@northamptonma.gov wrote: Felicia, I did look at the 4th floor ceiling. I didn’t see that the sheetrock is falling. There are areas along the north wall where the sheetrock is down on the beam (picture attached) but it does not appear that it fell; it seems likely that it was never fastened in that area when it was installed. It is clear from the paint on the beam that it has been that way since it was last painted. Were the sheetrock falling I would expect to see evidence of it pulling away from the fasteners (dimples in the surface) and I didn’t see any of that. I believe that the engineer is just going to look at the beams in the living room. I do not believe that the beams are dangerous but an inspection by an engineer seemed prudent. I did not see anything during my inspection that led me to believe that there are other structural issues. I don’t believe that the building is structurally unsound. It is important to understand that the building code does not require an existing structure meet the requirements of the current building code. The code states: ”102.6.1 Laws in Effect. Unless specifically provided otherwise in this code, and narrow to the provisions of this code, any existing building or structure shall meet and shall be presumed to meet the provisions of the applicable laws, codes, rules or regulations, bylaws or ordinances in effect at the time such building or structure was constructed or altered and shall be allowed to continue to be occupied pursuant to its use and occupancy, provided that the building or structure shall be maintained by the owner in accordance with this code.” Louis Hasbrouck Building Commissioner City of Northampton Town of Williamsburg 212 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 (413) 587-1240 From: feliciaac63@comcast.net [mailto:feliciaac63@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:59 PM To: Louis Hasbrouck Cc: NeJame, Mark; Daniel Wasiuk Subject: Re: 7 Pleasant Street Dear Mr. Hasbrouck, I have a question regarding your inspection, and with a pending structural inspection tomorrow morning, I am requesting a response as soon as possible. First, because I missed the bulk of your inspection, I am unaware of whether or not you inspected the roof, however; you made mention of it and the excessive snow loads in a passing email, so I assume that you did. I also assume that is it a point of concern given that it was not part of the original inspection/work that was done on this property last year. To that end, I would like to know if the structural inspection is to include ALL beams, even at roof level, or if your inspection was strictly limited to the beams in the living room area. This information is critical to me at this point, as someone qualified who since looked at the roof feels that, given the progression of the problem, there is cause for serious concern about the roof structure, and what is truly causing the sheet rock to fall. The board of health agrees that it should be looked at by the engineer. I was told the only way to see that is to get under that sheet rock and have a look. I do not, at this point, feel that it would be prudent to just re-secure the sheet rock without seeing what could be causing it to fall; would you agree? Thank you, Felicia Criscuolo 7 Pleasant Street Northampton, MA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Louis Hasbrouck" To: "Jordi Herold (jordiherold@earthlink.net)" Cc: "Lisa Kent (lkent@lnn-law.com)" , "Felicai Criscuolo (feliciaac63@comcast.net)" , "Mark nejame" , "David Narkewicz" , "Jesse Adams" , "Elaine Reall" , "Mayor of Northampton" Sent: Friday, April 1, 2011 2:29:43 PM Subject: 7 Pleasant Street Jordi, Here’s my letter about the inspection last evening at 7 Pleasant Street. I will hand deliver it this afternoon. Feel free to call if you have any questions. Louis Hasbrouck Building Commissioner City of Northampton Town of Williamsburg 212 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 (413) 587-1240 City of Northampton email messages are public records except when they fall under one of the specific statutory exemptions. ­­ City of Northampton email messages are public records except when they fall under one of the specific statutory exemptions. ­­ <8032443.278329.1302898243164.JavaMail.root@vms229.mailsrvcs.net> Re%3A RE%3A 7 Pleasant Street.EML Louis Hasbrouck [70.17.159.241] 216.119.106.50 206.46.173.9 No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_NONELEMENT_40_50, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, MIME_HTML_ONLY 216.119.106.50 216.119.106.50 by bsmtpd at northampton.ma.us mark_nejame@verizon.net 206.46.173.9 Anonymous EXCHANGE.main.city.northampton.ma.us 1302898280-018037085b17bcd0001-3Uhmxj gw4.webcontrolcenter.com[63.134.207.19] 206.46.173.9 206.46.173.9 1302898280 http://192.168.1.198:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Re: RE: 7 Pleasant Street Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.60956 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email 0.00 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.00 HTML_NONELEMENT_40_50 BODY: 40% to 50% of HTML elements are non-standard 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.00 Louis Hasbrouck EX /O=MAIN/OU=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=lhasbrouck lhasbrouck@northamptonma.gov Louis Hasbrouck feliciaac63@comcast.net SMTP feliciaac63@comcast.net feliciaac63@comcast.net feliciaac63@comcast.net Daniel Wasiuk EX /O=MAIN/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dwasiuk dwasiuk@northamptonma.gov Daniel Wasiuk lkent@lnn-law.com SMTP lkent@lnn-law.com lkent@lnn-law.com lkent@lnn-law.com