Loading...
HousingPartnershipMinutes1990NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ZONING AND GOVERNMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Subcommittee met January 16, 1990 with all regular members and City Planner Larry Smith in attendance. A wide ranging discussion ensued, encompassing the areas that the committee feels are important to include in the ongoing agenda: 1.Monitor and influence zoning proposals as they pertain to affordablehousing; Larry Smith to regularly update the committee on his upcomingproposals. 2.Advocate the rationalization and extension of greater den=:-it·":,I foraffordable housing in the Central City to include at least contiguousURC parcels. 3.Provide liaison with city zoning staff, Planning Board, andinspectors. Smith said comprehensive reviews of zoning ordinances and maps ·are underway. 4.Encourage full utilization of existing zoning provisions includingcomprehensive permits, special pe�mits, accessory apartments, etc.Identify parcels in City which can support added housing underexisting and proposed zoning ordinances, and develop strategy forencouraging arbitration. Hawley Street, Gothic Street, and BridgeRoad areas discussed. 5.With the advise of city officials, explore and develop workable linkageconcepts investigate successful special legislation in EasternMassachusetts. 6.Carry out ongoing process of community education and outreach,to overcome negative press and image regarding function of zoning. 7.Support the efforts of the Partnership in developing a housing policythat is coherent with P. Kim's strategic effort. 8.Investigate expansion of ZEA to five members. 9.Along with #6, prepare information briefing, to be updated annually,for ZEA, Planning Board, and various other boards/commissions, oncity's current and proposed housing needs (Strategic plan andimplementation). The spirited discussion continued long enough to make Ford and Brandt late for work, and simultaneously to begin establishing a friendly rapport amount members. Filed 1/22/90 at H.P. w/M.B. Initial agenda NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PAHTNEkSHIP Housing �reservation Subcommittee 1./l7/90 General discussion of our role, process; oganizatior1, and lunch options in reverse order. Examination of our agenda, as defined in "mission statement" a) Expiring use. We readily agreed that �here was an important role for the committee and subcommittee to play including l}moniter the city's actions and progress, recogni�iug the realitiesinherent in the city's position. 2}develop and pursue other approaches3}reasses city involvement.4}facilltate·necessary tenant organization fqr effective plan. b)Develop outreach and communication with landlords to assist themin preserving affordably priced units. c)Provide liason with the Fair Housing Committee to coordinate theactivities of both groups. d)Provide liason with SRO committee e)Advise city staff on housing assistance programs f)Conduct on going community education program g)captive $ concept. Define concept, local state and fedapplications. v--2/1/90 Subcommittee meeting Extended discussion of "captured, and recirculaLing" programs. Problems and realities. General and directed toward Mi.l.bank 2. Discussion of how hard a deal' one can force i.n a sj luation like Milbank 2, and who pays. a ) 1 ) exp i r i n g 1.t s e W i 11 , FH C and HCA C to w i th w i L h c i t y 2)Richard Lo draft "city letter" approaching owners. refusal possibility. review rest of our agenda add: 4) h) identify buildings that need "protecl ion" adjourn Ri�ht of'first ZONING & GOVERNMENT SUBCOMMI'IT.EE MEETING OF 2-8-90 (NOTE: Next meeting 2-20, 7:45 A.M., Autumn Inn) Discussion on Zoning "Housekeeping Changes" coming to Planning Board 2-8-90. JAW to discuss with A. Crystal to establish that H.P. wantsto be "in the loop" before the public hearing process begins. Mary agreed to coordinate with Penny Kim to ensure that subcommittee is consulted/informed on zoning developments, and to request an inventory of area under scrutiny for revision. JAW to suggest to Penny Kim/Musante that City have a zoning "subscription service" so that updates are made available to all holders of the zoning book. Discussion on possibility of Housing Forum for builders, planners, developers, etc., to gather information for the Planning Department on what procedures are most effective as "controls," as opposed to "impediments." Decision on need for "unit" definition in terms of SROs and lodging houses, so that Zoning and Building codes don't clash. Little enthusiasm is discernable for a larger ZBA. Subcommittee will consider whether to work further on this when it meets 2-20-90. At the next meeting, subcommittee will return to the 1-16-90 list and confirm disposition of items. NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes -Meeting -January 22, 1990 Members Present: Others Present: R.Abuza, B. Brandt, w. Bundy, s. Carrell, A.Crystal, J. Dunne, B. Fogel, M. Ford, D.Gengler, P. Goggins, c. Higgins, S. Kohler­Gray, A. Sax, N. Simms, J. Wright J.Brooks, K. Brunett Meeting was called to order at 7:50 p.m. Minutes were approved as submitted. The next regular meeting will be held February 13, 1990 at 7: 00 p. m. and regular monthly meetings will be the second Tuesday of the month. Sub-Committee Reports Zoning Sub-Committee J.Wright submitted copies of minutes. OPD office is in theprocess of reviewing and revising the Zoning Ordinance. Keyissues for the sub-committee include: development of the ninepoint agenda (see attached). The Committee will meet inbetween Partnership meetings. Policy and Planning sub-committee Susan Kohler-Gray distributed copies of minutes (see attached). The sub-committee looked at the job of the Committee and what they plan to accomplish. The sub-committee will work closely with the Strategic Planning Cabinet. Mary Ford requested a brief mission statement/policy for City Council adoption. Jim Brooks requested goals as to numbers of units to be developed. Housing Preservation Sub-Committee R.Abuza distributed minutes (see attached). This sub­committee focused on the Mission Statement and key issuesrelating to permanent affordability. Millbank II Presentation Austin Miller consultant with Janet Gezork presented the project. This project is being developed by Millbank Associates in conjunction with Valley CDC. The developers are requesting input and support for the project. The project Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes -Meeting of January 22, 1990 Page #2 includes 24 units as a limited equity co-op. Same style as Millbank I. Proposal includes all two-bedroom units ranging 950 -1,000 sq.ft., one and three-bedrooms are being considered. There are three sources of financing: R-DAL, Land Bank and tax credits. 50% of units will be low income -25-30% income to rent (707 certification) 50% market rate -$750.00 per month. In addition, four handi-capped units willbe developed. Comments included: Needs for one and three­bedroom units, and providing units for mentally disabled, notmuch need for handi-capped units. Members expressed interestin the creativity of the project and long-term affordability. Pat Goggins suggested a joint meeting of project review sub­committee and finance sub-committee. Committee agreed to set up a special meeting for Tuesday, January 30th -7:00 p.m. to discuss the project. 82 Bridge street The offer on the SRO project was accepted for $250,000.00. The CDC is working on the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Funding sources are being contacted including Land Bank, HIF, CDBG. CDBG Funds M.Berkley indicated the City will be looking for specificaffordable housing projects for use of CDBG. Applicationswill be available in March. conflict of Interest M.Berkley reported that anyone with a financial interest ina project must refrain from discussion and voting. M. Berkleywill research with other Partnerships and prepare a writtenpolicy with City Solicitor Kathleen Fallon and sub-committees.In addition, Committee members agreed to have all meetingsposted. Respectfully submitted, �f� MEB/jad 2/1/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes -Meeting -February 13, 1990 Members present: Others Present: R. Abuza, B. Brandt, s. Carrell, A. Crystal,J.Dunne, B. Fogel, M. Ford, D. Gengler, P.Goggins, s. Kohler-Gray, A. Sax J.Brooks, A. Miller, M. Berkley Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. Minutes were approved as submitted. Sub-Committee Reports Project and Finance -Joint Sub-committee Meeting A.Crystal presented a report on the joint meeting. The sub­committees went thru the project in detail with Austin Miller. Thediscussion focused on a mix of units, (3 bedrooms and 1 bedroomsbeing most desirable) a recommended mix of units was 6 1-bedroom,12 2-bedroom and 6 3-bedrooms. In addition it was recommended thatthe handi-capped units not be the subsidized units. The sub­committees also discussed the developer including a play area.Questions left unresolved included: the CDC's long-term involvement in the project, concern over not getting the opportunity to take a tax deduction as a potential owner. Following some discussion, Andy Crystal indicated that it was general consensus of the sub-committee to recommend the project in that it provides affordable housing. David Gengler moved that the Northampton Housing Partnership endorse in principal the Millbank II project as currently proposed based on its location, housing structure and opportunity for affordable housing with concerns as listed. Seconded by Al Sax. Following brief discussion motion was approved unanimously with one abstention. Zoning Sub-Committee (see attached report> D.Gengler presented the report, the Committee indicated a generalconcern over proposed changes in the Zoning Ordinance, the need tobe in the loop and to review and comment on changes. There was abrief discussion as to how the Partnership could be included in theprocess. Several members wanted the opportunity to review allproposed zoning changes prior to their submittal to the PlanningBoard, other members felt this was unnecessary and it was best forthe staff to present appropriate housing related changes to thePartnership. The Zoning Sub-committee requested that all changesbe submitted to the sub-committee for review. Pat Gogginsencouraged the sub-committee to recommend assigning a staffpersonto the ZBA. Minutes -Northampton Housing Partnership Meeting -February 13, 1990 Page #2 Policy and Planning Sub-committee (see attached report) s.Kohler-Gray reviewed the Committee's three major areas of focus:planning, internal partnership development and public education.A timeline for various activities was outlined and revised throughthe Partnership. Preservation Sub-committee (see attached report) R.Abuza presented a report. The sub-committee discussed methodsfor keeping projects affordable. In addition, the sub-committeewill work with the Fair Housing Committee to assist on expiring useprojects. SRO -82 Bridge Street Nick Simms and John Dunne met with Shawmut Bank and received positive feedback on the project. It appears they will lend funds for long-term financing of the project. In addition the Land Bank is interested in the project. The CDC is working on the Housing Innovations Fund (HIF) application and also working with architects on cost estimates. The CDC has met with the City to discuss zoning requirements, they may need to apply for a Special Permit. Other Business s.Carrell attended the Housing Partnership, key was thatMassachusetts is in the forefront as far as the Partnershipstructure; the missing component is support services in housing.Committee members received copies of Shel Horowitz's housingrecommendations. Pat Goggins referred the report to the ZoningSub-committee. The Massachusetts Housing Partnership requestednominations for the Mass. Partnership Board, nominations fromNorthampton included: Mayor Musante, Mary Ford and Sue Carrell. There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MEB/jad 2/28/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Housing Preservation Subcommittee Minutes of Subcommittee Meeting 3/9/90 9:30 am Valley CDC Liason with Fair Housing Committee. How can we assist? Forum on discrimination scheduled for April 25th. April is Fair Housing Month. Expiring Use: NOT TO EARLY TO START!!!! John: organizing at projects--special kind of organizing--development Role of CDBG funds MOTION: The HP subcommitte approved, and recommends that the HPC � (\ (\ -� approve: �� "Because we feel that the loss of�:amis¥�n Garden'.,would have a #ignificant affect on affordable housing, we recommend that the city of � Northampton take immediate and sustained action to direct resources and efforts towards the preservation of Hampton Gardens as low and Moderate • II income. we felt the recommendations of the HAC report should be followed through on. We feel that the current efforts in Somerville should be followed. We need to make clear that our organizing is aimed at putting a stucture ln ]?lace for expiring use options., not "against owners or management'' Our long term interest is served by working with current owners. Letter t.o owners, sent by? setting the stage for working with current owners. Other bus: Uses of rehab money--what are the ways we can best utilize these efforts to provide A.H. Northampton Housing Staffing Issues U Mass housing unusual time to make a pciint. long lead time. C,· e ·•tJ Sf srzo next meeting wed 28 march 9:30 am valley cdc NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Housing Preservation Subcommittee draft of letter to owners of expiring use projects Dear (Owner), Our community has appreciated the important contribution that Hamp..\a�n Gardens/Meadowbrook has made over the years to the quality of life for so many people. We recognize that your efforts in creating and maintaining your property was a part of the very unique mix of opportunities that has made our�' Northampton, such a special and desirable place to live. We obviously hope that the technical ending of any legal restrictions does not end the long and valuable relationship you have established with our community. If your plans are for continued ownership of the property, we as a {committee, and community} are ready to offer our resources to assist your any way we can to contintie to provide. �r§ housing ,.��;:i-zs-B:-Sr(D'.I:�tl�'"o If you are exploring possibilities of selling, we are interested in assisting you in completing a sale that works for both your financial interest, and the interest of the community. There are a variety of options that are available, ranging from our assisting in finding for-profit purchasers who have made a commitment to continue your efforts at providing this housing resource to the community; there are models of private-public partnerships; non-profit purchases; as well as new options that are being worked out to meet this special situation. We would like to st�cngly encourage you to let us work with you to explore any options that meet your needs. We expect that we can provide benefits to you through this process with our resourc�s, as well as provide the additional benefit of maintaining this resource of which you can be so proud. (If sent by the mayor change pronouns and add) I have a professional housing staff, and an active HPC who are as I am, anxious to dedicate the necessary time and energy on your behalf. forward to talking with you or your representatives. Sincerely� We look NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes -Meeting -March 13, 1990 Members Present: R.Abuza, w. Bundy, s. Carrell, A. Crystal, B.Fogel, M. Ford, J. Gezork, P. Goggins, s.Kohler-Gray, M. Senechal, N. Simms, J. Wright Others Present: B.Ames, M. Berkley Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. Minutes were approved as submitted. Sub-Committee Reports Policy and Planning Sub-committee Doing data collection. gathering. Project Sub-Committee No meeting scheduled. Zoning Sub-committee No meeting until completed with data The sub-committee met with P. Kim and L. Smith to discuss how housing/zoning issues could be addressed and how to bring the Partnership into the process. Agreement was that L. Smith and M. Berkley would bring zoning ordinance changes to the Zoning Sub­committee for input. The Zoning Sub-committee will present issues to the Partnership for consensus and Andy Crystal will present Partnership views to the Planning Board. Finance Sub-Committee No meeting scheduled. Minutes -Northampton Housing Partnership Meeting -March 13, 1990 Page #2 Preservation Sub-Committee R.Abuza presented the attached report. Will Bundy presentedinformation on the Fair Housing Committees activities. Regardingexpiring use R. Abuza requested that a letter be sent to the owners(see attached draft). Committee agrees letter to be sent andsigned by Mayor and Partnership with changes as indicated. Inaddition, the Committee approved the following motion, "The Citydirect resources toward preserving Hampton Gardens as low /modincome" (see minutes of Preservation meeting). Nick Simms provided an update on the Smith College SRO. SRO -82 Bridge street Nick Simms submitted a letter indicating he is speaking as a developer and not as a Partnership member. Nick reviewed the project and requested a letter of support from the Partnership. R.Abuza moved that the Partnership endorse the project, M. Fordseconded. Project was approved unanimously with three abstentions(J. Gezork, B. Fogel and N. Simms). CDBG Process M.Berkley presented information on how CDBG funds are utilized.There was general discussion as to 1) role of the Partnership inhousing projects and 2) projects to be submitted for finding. ThePartnership agreed that Housing Proposals will be submitted byothers and reviewed by the Partnership. Other Business The Gothic Street project was referred to the Project Sub-Committee for review. Meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. MEB/jad 4/2/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Zoning and Government Subcommittee Summary Report on Committee Meetings of 3-22-90 and 3-29-90: Committee met on these two occasions to review items pending forward from previous discussions, and in particular, to review the draft orainance materials submitted by Shel Horowitz and referred to the Committee by Pat Goggins. The first suggestion from the Horowitz proposal involves a suggested moratorium on conversion of rental units to condominiums, and after a lengthy discussion the Committee felt that the timing was not advantageous to this proposal, and it was tabled. The second suggestion involved a property tax rebate for landlords who retain rental units within specific affordable guidelines. After considerable discussion, the Committee felt positively regarding the intent of Horowitz's proposal, namely, that there should be some positive recognition of landlords who continue to work hard to preserve decent housing at reasonable prices. Two suggestions in this regard that in the opinion of this Subcommittee have considerable benefit are: 1)Some kind of awards program for landlords who maintain affordableunits, and 2) The use of some CDBG money for safety and energy relatedrehabilitation of units that are in an affordable price range. Thefirst would provide the moral support, and the second would help defraysome of those costs which often must be passed along in the form ofhigher rent, particularly when the work is required by publicauthorities. The Committee felt that the Housing PreservationSubcommittee should look at these and other suggestions and explore themin the light of their own wisdom. The opinion of the Committee is thatnot enough leverage or incentive is provided by the tax relief proposal. The third item in the Horowitz proposal regards a suggestion that 15% of all units within a development of 50 units or more be set aside in the affordable price range. The advice of the City's law department is that we cannot do this under existing State statutes. However, the Committee felt that it would like to explore the implications of requiring a special permit with affordability guidelines as a requirement for any subdivision over a certain size. There was much discussion as to whether this intervention would provide incentive or further obstacles, with an agreement to pursue the discussion further at the next meeting. Marcia and Larry to provide further input. Horowitz's proposal regarding a rent review board was considered and tabled with the thought that further regulation at this time would counter the considerable efforts of the Housing Partnership to build a successful and productive coalition with all participants in the housing crisis, without offsetting benefits. Significant discussions were had on the availability and advisability of additional two or three family houses in various city zones. There is a range of opinion on the matter, from a desire to have .such units by right in most zones to a desire to have a special permit requirement in most zones. At the close of the discussion, the Chair suggested that perhaps expanding the availability of two family homes by right in new construction and renovation throughout URB, in addition to the existing allowance in URC, could be combined with a special permit application for two and three family units in the outlying URA and other residential zones, and a special permit for three family in URB. This proposal will need further discussion at the next meeting of the Committee, and be forwarded to drafting by the City's Planning Department and testing as to its fit with existing and planned ordinance changes. The Committee is appreciative of having the thoughtful input of the Horowitz proposals in this area in particular. The Planning Department is pursuing the process of resizing the requirements for building lots in various neighborhoods within the city, and this would appear to address the Horowitz concern regarding the appropriate lot sizes in various neighborhoods within the city, key and of scope of the current lot-size averaging ordinance. The proposal to cap the number of building units over a certain price range within the city did not meet with a strong sense that it supported the affordability charge of the Committee. Larry Smith noted that the flow of subdivision applications continues despite a slow real estate environment; thus, action is appropriate and timely if we see the need for changes. The Horowitz proposal that many units that receive public money be projected for affordability continues to be a topic of considerable interest and discussion in the Committee. The zoning impact is not yet clear, but will be discussed further at the next meeting. The committee is looking for clarification from the Partnership as to its (the Committee's) role in creating an ordinance. Comments from the Partnership Chair would be appreciated. Two times within eight days the Committee has exhausted the Autumn Inn's supply of hot beverages and tolerance for animated-to-raucous discussion/ and adjourned. , �ect£uf1'.Y submitted, // / t NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes -Meeting -May a, 1990 Members present: R.Abuza, w. Bundy, s. Carrell, A. Crystal, J.Dunne, B. Fogel, M. Ford, D. Gengler, P.Goggins, C. Higgins, s. Kohler-Gray, A. Sax,M.Senechal, N. Simms, J. Wright Others present: M.Berkley, Councillor Brooks and CouncillorAmes Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Minutes of the April meeting will be available at the next meeting. 1.Faith Lally from Mass. Housing Partnership was present todiscuss the Mass. Housing Fair to be held June 16, 1990 atHolyoke Community College. The plan is to bring people withproducts together with potential homeowners. All interestedbuyers and sellers are welcome. 2. 3. Faith requested that the Northampton Housing Partnership co­sponsor a meeting with the Mass. Housing Partnership to discuss the Community Reinvestment Act and the Mass. Bankers Association proposal. The meeting would include the local banking community and area partnerships. John Kline of Mass. Housing Partnership would discuss the Mass. Bankers Association proposal. The Partnership agrees to co-sponsor the meeting, the date will be June 12 at 7:00 p.m. Goal of the meeting is to better understand the Mass. Bankers Association pool of funds and to identify specific programs we would like to see funded by the lending community. A sub­committee including: c. Higgins, A. Sax and M. Ford will meet to discuss the potential projects we would see the banking community working on. community Development Block Grant Report M.Berkley reported on the progress of the CDBG process. 82 Bridge street J.Dunne reported that the plan is to close on Bridge Streeton June 1. They received a commitment of $240,000 from HIF,Shawmut Bank looks good and ICE has been contacted to takepart in construction financing. In addition, they received$11,500 from CEDAC, but they will be asking the City for anadditional $25,000 in CDBG funds. Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting -May a, 1990 Page #2 4.Gothic street 5. The other party contacted P. Goggins asking the NDC to bu�their contract, P. Goggins said it was too expensive and.declined on the offer. We expect the owner to come back tothe NDC on our offer. Sub-committee Reports Zoning Sub-Committee The sub-committee will proceed with zoning recommendations inthe third packet to be submitted, they anticipate looking at: two-family by right inclusionary zoning -requiring developers to provide affordable units on certain size developments In addition, the sub-committee will sponsor a forum on the Comprehensive Permit process to promote the process. Policy and Planning Sub-Committee The data will be available from the Planning Office by the end of the week and the sub-committee will begin to analyze needs of the community. Mass. Housing Partnership Board Nick Simms representing the area indicated that primary focus \'6-HT° on the state budget. Next meeting of the Partnership will be July 10, 1990. Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ma cia Berkley, Community Development er MEB/jad 6/26/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP MINUTES OF MEETING -APRIL 12, 1990 Members Present: s.Carrell, J. Dunne, B. Fogel, M. Ford, D.Gengler, J. Gezork, P. Goggins, C. Higgins. S.Kohler-Gray, A. Sax, N. Simms, J. Wright Others Present: M.Berkley, M. Kirby Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. meeting were approved. Minutes of the March 1. 2. Sub-committee Reports Zoning Sub-Committee They are looking at a variety of zoning changes in response to the Shel Horowitz proposal. There were no other sub-committee reports. 82 Bridge street Nick Simms reported than an agreement has been reached. The Purchase and Sale has not yet been signed but final revisions have been drafted. The HIF Application has been submitted and the CDC should hear in about two weeks. 3.Gothic street J.Wright met with NOC Board to discuss the proposal.The proposal was to have the NOC acquire an option for the property. A consultant would be hired and the consultant would prepare an RFP for a developer. The NOC approved allocating $2 5, 000 for making an offer. An offer was made but not accepted, another offer was received. 4.CDBG M.Berkley identified specific projects that could be funded.B.Fogel suggested that there be a drawdown fund. J. Dunneconcurred that there be a Housing line item for projects overthe year. J. Wright suggested there be specificity in someways and a drawdown also available. M. Ford agreed some moneyought to be in drawdown, and she agreed with the J. Wrightproposal of some drawdown money and some specific projectmoney. Motion was made that the Housing Partnership support a fund of $275,000 to be used in the following categories: 1) programs to assist in the development of affordable housing, 2)pre-development costs for acquisition and development of NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes of Meeting -August 7, 1990 Members Present: R.Abuza, s. Carrell, A. Crystal, J. Dunne, B.Fogel, M. Ford, P. Goggins, C. Higgins, s.Kohler-Gray, N. Simms, B. Wilson Others Present: M.Berkley Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. April 12 meeting were approved. Minutes of May 8 and 1.82 Bridge street J.Dunne reported that the CDC owns the building. Both theChristian Science Monitor and New York Times are doing storieson the SRO. John thanked the Partnership for their help, andindicated that the CDC will be seeking an additional $25,000from CDBG funds. Construction will start the end of Augustand the name is the Hampshire Inn. The SRO Corporation isconsulting with agencies on SRO management. 2.Gothic street 3. P.Goggins advised the Committee that the optionee hasrequested a zone change to CB in order to develop a parkinglot on the site. Motion was made and seconded to send aletter to the Planning Board indicating that the HousingPartnership was interested in the site for housing and anoffer was made by the Partnership. The site is best utilizedfor housing for the following reasons: the site has alwaysbeen housing, using the lot for housing is consistent with theneighborhood, there is little URC to develop housing on andthe site has excellent access to the downtown. Motion wasapproved unanimously. Project Review Process (CDBG S> P.Goggins indicated that there are five projects to bereviewed for CDBG funding and recommends projects be reviewedby the Project Review Committee. Several Committee membersfelt two of the projects had already been reviewed by ProjectReview. In addition, Cammi ttee members expressed concern overno criteria for evaluating a project. Motion was made thata two step process be followed for the review of projects:1)a joint review by Finance & Project Review Sub-committeeswith a recommendation to the Partnership; 2) the fullPartnership reviews the project for CDBG funding. Unanimouslyapproved. The $25,000 request for CDBG funds for 82 BridgeStreet was approved with three abstentions. Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting -August 7, 1990 Page #2 4. In addition, the following criteria should be addressed by each applicant looking for CDBG funds: impact on project if there are no CDBG funds, number of people served, percent low income served, long term affordability, type of housing and where are they in the process. sub-Committee Reports Policy/Planning Sub-committee s.Kohler-Gray reported on Committee activities (see attachednotes). Data collection on needs is completed and they arestarting to focus on goals. Susan reviewed the questionsbeing looked at for analysis and she requested feed-back fromthe Partnership. c. Higgins suggested looking at very lowincome families with children. The Sub-committee will presentdata and goals at the September 11 meeting. The Partnershipwould like the data and goals sent out prior to the September11 meeting. Zoning sub-committee Committee is focusing on 1) 2-3 family units by right with Site Plan Review; 2) Inclusionary Zoning. Future meetings will focus on a workshop on Comprehensive Permits and various site opportunities for housing. Finance committee Adopted a Mission Statement and agreed to utilize 25-30% of income to define "affordable housing". Committee has been focusing on the use of $25,000 CDBG funds for Home-ownership Program. They plan to put together a program and try to obtain other funds to add to the pool. Other Business Between now and next meeting Pat will review membership and add to sub-committees. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Marcia Berkley, Community Development ner MEB/jad NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes of Meeting September 11, 1990 Members Present: R.Abuza, W. Bundy, s. Carrell, A. Crystal, B.Fogel, M. Ford, D. Gengler, P. Goggins, C.Higgins, s. Kohler-Gray, A. Sax, N. Simms, J.Wright, B. Wilson. Others Present: M.Berkley Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. Minutes were approved as submitted. 1. Millbank II The developer has withdrawn the request,there was no presentation. 2.Attendance 3. P.Goggins indicated that several members had missed more thanthe three consecutive meetings established as a policy. Patwill contact members and ask if they plan to continue. CDBG Projects for Review Two projects have been submitted, HER, Inc. and 91 Grove Street. Both will require a review by the Finance and Project Review Committee. A joint meeting will be held October 3 at 11:30 a.m. 4.Atwood Drive 5. Councillor John Morrison presented information on Atwood Driveand potential for developing affordable housing on theproperty. The concept of re-zoning to rural residential wasdiscussed. This was referenced to the Zoning Sub-committeefor a recommendation. Policy and Planning Presentation The Policy and Planning Sub-committee presented informationon needs within the community and recommended long and shortterm goals. Partnership members provided input regardingmaterials presented and revisions to the goals. The followingcomments were made: it will be important to provide definitionto the public, perhaps long term goals should be ten years and Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting -September 11, 1990 Page #2 short term less, and there should be an emphasis on the large percentage (almost 50%) of housing stock that is rental. Considerable discussion centered on the advertising of incoming rents and fear of rents increasing. It was suggested that the sub-committee attempt to identify the number of units that are needed in the community. Bruce Fogel suggested that a goal be added, "To stabilize the Northampton marketplace". The Committee agreed to table approving the goals until the next meeting. Meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Marcia Berkley, Co unity Development Planne MEB/jad 10/2/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes of Meeting November 13, 1990 Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. Present: R. Abuza, w. Bundy, J. Dunne, B. Fogel, D. Gengler, J. Gezork, P. Goggins, M. Hebert, C. Higgins, A. Sax, M. Senechal, B. Wilson The minutes were not available for approval. 1.SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS Finance Committee B.Fogel presented a report, a meeting has been scheduled withlocal lenders for Tuesday, November 20; the purpose is todiscuss program development potential. The Project Review and Finance Committee met to review a new request from HER, Inc. They have requested $9,650.00 to cover debt service and staffing. B. Fogel moves $2,650 of CDBG funds be granted for staffing during the rehabilitation period and $7,000 of CDBG funds be loaned, payable at the time of the end loan. In addition, HER, Inc. agrees to submit a transition plan for Section 8 Mod-rehab Certificates should the project failjand HER, Inc. agrees that this is the last time for CDBG funds into the project. Motion was seconded by R.Abuza. There was discussion of maintaining the Section 8 'sin the project, and concern expressed as to the stability ofHER, lnc. Committee members also expressed an interest inoffering technical assistance to HER, Inc. The motion wasapproved unanimously with two abstentions. Preservation Committee R.Abuza presented a report. Shelley Abend (HCAC) hasattended the committee meetings. The Committee has focused onexpiring use projects and potential of Mutual Housing conceptfor these projects. It appears there is legislative reliefnow on the project, with a first right-of-refusal available tothe community and non-profits. In addition, R. Abuza remindedthe Committee of the letter to be sent to owners ofMeadowbrook and Hampton Gardens. A joint HousingPartnership/Mayor letter will be sent. Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting -November 13, 1990 Page #2 zoning committee M.Berkley presented the report -the Committee focused onpreparing for the Comprehensive Permit Workshop. The workshopwas held October 23, approximately fifteen people attended.Bob Ritchie, Attorney from Amherst presented information onComprehensive Permits. As a result two developers havecontacted the Planning Office interested in ComprehensivePermits. Policy/Planning Committee continues to work on objectives. 2.Pat Goggins initiated discussion on the Housing Authorityappointment. He asked the Partnership if they might beinterested in taking a position on an appointment, since thePartnership wants to work closely with the Housing Authority.Committee members initiated a great deal of discussion on thetopic. Several members felt it important to send a letter tothe City Council and indicate the importance of an independentcandidate, but to not back a particular candidate. B. Fogelmoved, that a letter be sent to City Council not supportingone particular candidate, but lauding Susan Kohler-Gray andher efforts and stressing the importance of the position tothe Partnership, the need for an independent position andremoving politics from the appointment. David Genglerseconded. Several members expressed concern about the Partnership becoming too political and future political ramification. Committee voted four yes, six no, one abstention. This item will be included on the next agenda. 3.Gothic street site This property is on the current MLS sheet at $250,000. Pat Goggins has spoken to the NOC and they are still committed to the $25,000 for an option. The Committee discussed the ability to get a developer for the site. Both Janet Gezork and Bob Wilson feel there are only a few developers in a position to speculate. David Gengler feels we should move on the site. Clare Higgins is concerned of the density. The Committee agrees that Jonathan, Bruce and Pat should discuss the site further. Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting -November 13, 1990 Page #3 4. 5. 6. Egerton Site The owners indicate that they can't make affordable housing use on the site, maybe DPW will consider a land swQp. 82 Bridge Street J.Dunne reported that expect to open the end of December.The management company is taking applications and they arelooking for a resident manager. smith vocational The Planning Office is working with Smith Voe and the Land Trust in an attempt to implement an infill program. Each year the City will identify a��property for transfer to the Land Trust and construction by Smith Voe. Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MEB/jad 11/28/90 NORTHAMPTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP Minutes of Meeting December 11, 1990 Meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. -c. Higgins chaired in Pat Goggins absence. Present: R.Abuza, w. Bundy, s. Carrell, J. Dunne, B. Fogel, M.Ford, D. Gengler, J. Gezork, C. Higgins, M. Senechal, N.Simms. Minutes were approved as submitted. 1.Sub-Committee Reports zoning Sub-Committee M.Berkley presented a report, the Committee has been workingon housing linked with the proposed Business Park Zone and theStrategic Plan. s. Carrell initiated a discussion on thedemolition ordinance -the Zoning Committee will reviewdemolition ordinance potential. R. Abuza expressed concernover the local Historic District Ordinance and encouraged thepublic being apprised of pros and cons on the ordinance. Policy and Planning Sub-Committee s.Carrell reported on the mission, goals, objectives andactivities that were drafted by the Sub-committee. Membersreceived copies of the proposed statements and were asked toreport back at the next Partnership meeting. Preservation Sub-Committee R.Abuza reported a letter has been sent to the owners ofHampton Gardens and Meadowbrook Apartments asking them to workwith the Mayor and Housing Partnership on Expiring Use issues. Finance Sub-committee c.Higgins reported that the Committee met with local lendersto discuss the Housing Survey and Needs Analysis and CRA. Tento twelve banks were represented -another meeting wasscheduled to talk further about needs. Key in the meeting wasthe importance of making the public aware of CRA and how tomarket programs to the public. Northampton Housing Partnership Minutes of Meeting December 11, 1990 Page #2 2.Gothic Street Site 3. M.Berkley reported that an offer was being submitted and theNorthampton Development Corporation was still committed toproviding funds for optioning the property. C. Higginsstressed the importance of permanent affordability. Motionwas made, that the Project Review Committee, with assistancefrom other Partnership members draft criteria to incorporateinto the Request For Proposal. Approved unanimously. Housing Authority Appointment There was much discussion as to the Partnership sending a letter endorsing the appointment of an independent candidate. The Committee recommended that Marjorie, Mary and Will draft a letter to City Councillors recommending the appointment be a person who is independent. Approved unanimously. 4.Other Business The State Hospital Bill has not reached a final vote yet.Millbank II has received funding from EOCD for twenty-fourunits -as a limited equity co-op. s. Carrell agrees to senda letter to Amy Anthony and Austin for pursuing and fundingthis project. senior Planner S.Carrell recommended that a letter be sent to the Mayorencouraging that the Senior Planner position be filled. ThePartnership agreed that J. Wright send a letter to the Mayor. There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, MEB/jad 12/27/90