Loading...
2010 through 2013 FORMER Historic District Commission minutes Elm Street Historic District Commission Meeting Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:30 p.m. – City Hall (planning office) MINUTES Attendees: Marisa Labozzetta, Edy Ambroz, Pauline Fogel, Bruce Kriviskey, Martha Lyon, and Bonnie Parsons, PVPC (consultant) The following items were discussed: Expansion Project Bonnie Parsons, preservation planner from the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission presented an update on the effort to expand the district boundaries. She reminded the commission that the deadline is June 1, and reported that her work is almost complete. Bonnie summarized her work with the following points:  She has created new B-Forms for 29 properties that (1) were not on Elm Street and had not previously been assigned inventory numbers, and (2) were on Elm Street but had never been inventoried. Streets included Tyler, Round Hill, Bedford, Kensington, Dryads and Prospect.  To complete her research, she consulted the Daily Hampshire Gazette index (for obituaries, in particular), and scanned the federal census and city directories for each house. She also consulted the 1915 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map (at the Forbes).  She noted that she had planned to inventory 4 properties on State Street, but discovered that they were already in the Downtown Business District.  She recommended that the inventory be extended to Trumbull Street to include 4 additional properties.  She created a new boundary map that adheres to the definition set by the commission before the public meeting, and noted that the new boundary includes about 30 additional properties.  She noted that she was having difficulty determining the name of the architect for the Autumn Inn, which was built in 1967/1968. The commission members suggested looking at archived Daily Hampshire Gazette articles. Bonnie concluded her presentation by asking the commission to check the B- Forms for errors (send her an e-mail message with any corrections), and asked if the members would like her to include any additional properties. Bruce asked that she inventory the Smith College Arts and Campus Centers (even though they Page 1 of 3 are less than 50 years old), because they are works created by architects, and gathering information about them now will be helpful to future commissions. She noted that she will be completed with the expansion portion of her project once the photographs are taken (after the weather improves), and after she has verified all inventory numbers with the Massachusetts Historical Commission. She will be submitting two printed sets of each form, as well as digital copies. Following Bonnie’s presentation, Marisa reviewed the expansion process from this point forward, which would take no less than three months and would include:  Public hearing(s) (at least one, and maybe two)  Review by a Council committee  City Council vote. ESHD Projects Marisa reported that no projects were up for review at the moment. St. Mary’s Marisa reported that we have a six month statute of limitations on the spire repair work. Tony Patillo (building commissioner) has looked into the status of the scaffolding, and reported that it remained in place because of the instability of the slate on the roof and its potential threat to pedestrians. Tony reported that the church is working on repairs to the slate – that on January 12, 2010 a bid package was in progress. St. Mary’s is officially closed, as is Blessed Sacrament. Marisa noted that she had done some research on churches with staff at the National Trust for Historic Preservation. History shows that courts typically side with churches over questions of use/disposal, etc, but that churches MUST adhere to historic district guidelines in their decision-making. The NTHP staff member advised that it is best to keep decisions about the long-term status of churches out of the courts. District Signs Marisa reported that the district signs have been fabricated, and that DPW had, last fall, waived the permit fee. Because winter came early, it was not possible to install them after they were fabricated. Marisa stated that the commission will need to obtain a new permit in the spring and call Dig-Safe back to re-mark utility locations, before the signs can be installed. Sign Publicity Marisa suggested that the commission contact the Daily Hampshire Gazette for an article/photo opportunity when the signs are installed. She suggested that we have a formal unveiling, possibly featuring Paul Specter. She offered to contact the paper and make arrangements with Paul when the time comes. Page 2 of 3 Election of Chair & Vice-Chair The commission held annual elections for chair and vice-chair:  Chair: Martha made the motion to nominate Marisa Labozzetta and Edy seconded the nomination. Vote was 5-0 for the election of Marisa Labozzetta as chair for the next year.  Vice-Chair: Pauline made the motion to nominate Martha Lyon as acting Vice Chair/Secretary and Bruce seconded the nomination. Vote was 5-0 for the election of Martha Lyon as acting Vice Chair/Secretary for the next year. Note: because Martha is an alternate member of the commission, she must serve in an acting position. New Business Pauline mentioned that she had seen a new fire escape appended to the yellow house on the corner of Vernon and Elm (owned by Borowski), and wondered whether this addition had been passed through the commission process via the building inspector. Merger The commission moved the discussion about the merger between the commission and the Northampton Historical Commission to the agenda for the next meeting. Page 3 of 3 Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes and Agenda DATE: Thursday May 6, 2010 TIME: 6:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall)- use rear door Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Bruce Kriviskey, Edy Ambroz, Martha Lyon, Norm Winston, and Pauline Fogal. Staff present: Wayne Feiden Agenda Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 6:10 PM. 1.Working session on Elm Street Historic District proposed regulations, district expansion, and design guidelines The Historic District Commission had a working session on the proposed revision to the Elm Street Historic District regulations, district expansion, and design guidelines. The working session was focused on understanding the regulations and providing the board with to think about the options. No action was taken on the regulations 2.Other necessary business. No other business was taken up. The Commission adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:30 PM. Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes and Agenda DATE: Thursday July 1, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Bruce Kriviskey, Edy Ambroz, Martha Lyon, Norm Winston, and Pauline Fogal. Staff present: Wayne Feiden Others Present: Paul Spector, John Robinson Agenda 1.Comments/edits on final version of the Elm Street Historic District Design Standards, including items pertaining to parking and DPW 2.Order of presentation of ordinance revisions to City Council 3.Discussion on merger of Historic District Commission and Historic Commission Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 6:35 PM and helped take the Commission through the draft design manual page by page. The Commission agreed:  Residential antennae and satellite dishes up to 24” should be exempt, but larger dishes should require a certificate of appropriateness.  Under doors replacement doors would remain exempt only when design, appearance, and materials all matched the door being replaced.  Language about fees for Certificate of Non-Applicability will be removed so that the manual is not out-of-date if a fee is ever charged for this service.  Work in a right-of-way above certain thresholds would require consultation with but not approval of the Historical Commission.  To several minor changes and changes that would prevent the manual from becoming out of date as regulations changed. The Commission agreed that the list of exemptions should NOT be included in the manual but rather attached as a separate handout for easy updating. The committee discussed the proposed merger with the Historical Commission. Staff reported that the committee needs staffing to ensure our compliance with statutory requirements and prevent city exposure, and that the city does not have resources to provide the increased staffing necessary if the district expands or more of the exemptions get removed and require certificates of appropriateness. The commission still has concerns about what would be lost with a merge and wants more time to work these issues through. Everyone agreed to move forward on the changes to the design manual so that it can be printed and distributed, but to put off regulatory changes (dropping items that are exempted or expanding the district) until this issue can be worked out satisfactorily. The Commission adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:20 PM. Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes and Agenda DATE: Tuesday September 1, 2009 TIME: 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton (use rear door) 5:00 Public Hearing 1.: Replace front door and sidelights at 197 Elm Street, Fletcher Blanchard and Heidi Schiller. 2.Correspondence--Smith College Photovoltaic Panel on Campus Center 3.Design Standards/District Expansion Project  Meet with Bonnie Parsons, PVPC 4.Update on OPD staffing resources for Historical Commission 5.Future meeting dates  Plan November 17, 2009 Public Hearing  Routine public meeting dates for permit applications Members Present: Marisa Labozzetta, Chair (removed herself from Schiller hearing and arrived 7:45 PM) Edythe Ambroz Pauline Fogel Bruce Kriviskey Martha Lyon, Alternate (Norm Winston was absent) Staff Present: Wayne Feiden, Planning Director Edythe Ambroz opened the meeting and the scheduled public hearing at 5:35 PM. 5:35 PM (delayed from 5:00) Fletcher Blanchard and Heidi SchillerPublic Hearing .: The Schillers presented their plans to replace front door and sidelights at 197 Elm Street because of the failing condition of the existing door. The applicant said that instead of the door shown in the application they want to drop the four lights on the top of the door and replace it with a six panel wood door with raised panels. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the application for a new front door and sidelights, with three conditions: 1.No highlights on the door and use a six panel wood door; and 2.Door and windows fit within the footprint of the existing door and windows; and 3.The windows have permanently mounted integral mullions Design Standards/District Expansion Project Meet with Bonnie Parsons, PVPC. Bonnie reported on the revisions she is working on to the historic design guidelines and passed out her inventory work of buildings in the areas that the Commission is considering for inclusion in the district. The Commission agreed that the next step was for them to figure out the exact boundaries of the proposed district. They discussed the issues: 1.There was an apparent consensus to include the Smith College areas immediately abutting Kensington and the Round Hill areas; 2.There was an apparent consensus not to go too far into neighborhood areas that might be a separate conversation at some point in the future,; 3.There was an agreement that the issue to discuss is whether they want to go one additional property beyond the Smith College campus, which they agreed to decide on at their next meeting. Pauline Fogel suggested that a zoning change to prevent accessory apartments from putting exterior staircases on the front yards of buildings might be a more cost effective approach to prevent projects that don’t fit in with historic neighborhoods. Correspondence Smith College notified the Commission that they are hoping to install photovoltaic panels on Campus Center, which is exempt from the district requirements (not visible from a public way and PV is exempt). Martha Lyon reported on proposed Historic District signs and the cost options, using Porcupine Graphics. The board asked her to also get figures using a steel sign with a simple post to see if it is less expensive. Update on OPD staffing resources for Historical Commission Feiden provided a quick update on discussions to merge the Historic District Commission into the Historical Commission. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to authorize the Director of Planning and Development or his designee to issue Certificates of Non-Applicability. Future meeting dates  Next meeting—October 5, 2009  Plan November 17, 2009 Public Hearing  Routine public meeting dates for permit applications The Commission adjourned at 7:30 PM Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Agenda and Minutes 5:00 PM Thursday September 23, 2010 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton 1.Approval of minutes of May 6, 2010 and July 1, 2010. 2. 5:00 PM Public Hearing on a Determination of Appropriateness for an outdoor ground central air unit behind the house at 187 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-040). 3.Review and finalize process for exemptions and certificates of non-applicability. 4.Check in on future revised ordinance. Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Bruce Kriviskey, Martha Lyon, Norm Winston, and Pauline Fogal. Marissa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 5:00 PM. Minutes Upon motion by Norman Winston and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of May 6, 2010 and July 1, 2010, with two corrections in the spelling of names. 5:00 PM Public Hearing on a Historic Determination of Appropriateness for an outdoor ground central air unit directly behind the house at 187 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-040). Marisa Labozzetta then recessed herself and Martha Lyon opened the public hearing at 5:07 PM and reviewed the staff report recommending a Certificate of Appropriateness. Marisa Labozzetta, the applicant, presented her request. There was no public comment. Bruce Kriviskey pointed out that the project was very small, didn’t touch the house, and was easily reversible. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Norman Winston, the Commission voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the application. Review and finalize process for exemptions and certificates of non-applicability. The commission agreed by unanimous consent to approve the final design manual and sent it to PVPC for final changes and printing. The commission agreed to dedicate their next meeting to reviewing which projects should be exempt and which should require a certificate of non-applicability. The commission also agreed that they were ready to move ahead with a joint meeting with the Historical Commission and explore how a merger of the boards might work. At 6:05 PM, and upon motion by Norman Winston and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn. TO: Elm Street Historic District Commission FROM: Wayne Feiden, FAICP, Director of Planning and Development RE: STAFF REPORT: Thursday Sept. 23, 2010 Historic Commission Meeting DATE: September 14, 2010 1.Historic Determination of Appropriateness for an outdoor ground central air unit directly behind the house at 187 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-040). This is a very minor change, has only a minor change in view from a public view, and does not change the historical integrity of any structure. Staff recommends issuing a Determination of Appropriateness. 2.Review and finalize application process for exemptions and certificates of non- applicability. We have been working on options for streamlining the permit process for those projects which do not require Certificates of Appropriateness (i.e., exempt projects and Certificates of Non-Applicability) that are consistent with the city permitting process. We think we can significantly streamline Certificates of Non-Applicability. We also have a couple of options for dealing with exemptions that we would like to discuss. rd We hope to finalize these on the 23 so that the design manual can go to the printers on th the 24. 3.Check in on future revised ordinance. We just want to check in on the discussions on this issue and identify what additional information is necessary for the next steps. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Agenda and Minutes 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM Wednesday October 20, 2010 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton 1.Approval of minutes of September 23, 2010 2.Review Elm Street Historic District exemptions, certificates of non-applicability, and certificates of appropriateness 3.Other necessary business Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, and Pauline Fogal. Ms. Labozzetta opened the meeting at 5:05 PM. Upon motion by Marisa Labozzetta and second by Pauline Fogal, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of September 23, 2010. The commission then reviewed the Elm Street Historic District exemptions, certificates of non-applicability, and certificates of appropriateness to consider ways to clarify and streamline. Staff will take comments and draw up a detailed proposal in ordinance language, for the commission to discuss at their next meeting. st Commissioners agreed to have their next meeting on Monday November 1 at 5:00 for this next step. The Commission adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:10 PM. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM Monday November 1, 2010 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton 1.Approval of minutes of October 20, 2010 2.Review and finalize proposed Elm Street Historic District exemptions, certificates of non-applicability, and certificates of appropriateness 3.Other necessary business Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Ms. Labozzetta opened the meeting at 5:05 PM. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Pauline Fogal, the Commission voted unanimously to approval of minutes of October 20, 2010. The Commission reviewed and finalize proposed Elm Street Historic District exemptions, certificates of non-applicability, and certificates of appropriateness. Upon motion by Edy Ambrose and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend the amended ordinance to City Council. The Commission agreed to attend a joint meeting with the Historical Commission to allow the Commission to observe the Historical Commission and have any requested conversation about a possible merger of the two commissions. Upon motion by Marisa Labozzetta and second by Pauline Fogal, the Commission voted unanimously to rescind their last vote endorsing an ordinance to merge the two commissions and agreed to finalize their recommendations on a possible merger by the end of 2010. The Commission agreed to adjourn by unanimous consent at 6:45 PM. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Agenda 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Monday December 6, 2010 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton 1.Clarify proposed Elm Street Historic District ordinance amendments on gutters, downspouts, and water collectors 2.Other necessary business not reasonably known by the chair when agenda created Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Agenda 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Monday December 6, 2010 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey. Marisa Labozzeta opened the meeting at 5:00 PM. The Commission reviewed the final printed historic district design guidelines. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Edy Ambrose, the Commission voted 3-2 to accept the design guidelines as printed and note in the cover letter that goes out that the version on the web will mention all of the existing homes under the pictures of examples. All commission members liked the guidelines and the only dissent had to do with whether the cover letter needed this language. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Edy Ambrose, the Commission voted unanimously to thank Marisa Labozzetta for her hard work overseeing the design guidelines and to thank Martha Lyon for her hard work writing many of the guidelines. The Commission discussed the draft Elm Street Historic District ordinance amendments as they relate to gutters, downspouts, and water collectors. The agreed to a minor amendments to allow gutters, downspouts and water collectors not otherwise exempt to be approved with a Certificate of Non-Applicability. The Commissioners agreed that there next meeting would be when they met jointly with the Historical Commission on December 20, 2010. The Commission adjourned at 6:45 PM. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Monday February 7, 2011 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Application by St. John’s Episcopal Church, 48 Elm Street, for a new ground sign (Map ID 31D-101) Marisa Labozzetta opened the public hearing at 5:05 PM. Shawn Allen, Reverand Catherine Munz and Lee Anderson presented the application. Granite posts will be pink with black specs that are similar to the building, and possibly from the same quarry and the original building. The Historical District Commission asked about whether sign colors could be darker and more subdued than using white, to ensure the sign does not look commercial and blends in with the church and to balance the sign being larger than recommended in the Elm Street Historic District Design Guidelines. The applicant agreed that the sign itself should not be white, although the changeable sign portion would be. The Commission also discussed the size of the letters and what would be appropriate. The Commission discussed whether 10” posts were too large, whether the sign should be more vertical, and whether the size of the lettering was appropriate to ensure that the sign would not overpower the site. The applicant emphasized that the vertical and substantial concrete support posts and the arch on the sign are designed to make a statement and respect the church architecture. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Pauline Fogal the Historic District Commission voted unanimously to close the public hearing and approve the application as proposed with the following conditions: 1.Use 8” posts (instead of the proposed 10” posts). 2.The sign frame colors be subdued darker background (not white). The Commission adjourned at 5:55 PM. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes of Monday April 7, 2011 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, and Pauline Fogal. Application by St. John’s Episcopal Church, 48 Elm Street, for a Determination of Applicability for new ground sign (Map ID 31D-101), based on the application filed on March 18, 2011. Marisa Labozzetta opened the public hearing at 6:00 PM, as advertised in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, posted with the City Clerk, and mailed to the abutting property owners. The applicant and their designer Hans Blas presented the application, which was slightly revised from the version that was reviewed by the Commission in February. The proposed sign will have New Hampshire pink granite posts with black specs that are similar to the building, a charcoal or dark gray sign fame and boundary, red or white St. John’s letters, a black section for changeable signage, and white changeable signage on the black background. The sign will be forged metal, metal cap, hidden hinges, and a wooden frame. There was some discussion about what lighting would be appropriate. The commission agreed that interior lighting would be appropriate. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Edy Ambrose the Historic District Commission voted unanimously to close the public hearing and approve the application as presented, with approval allowing lighting within the sign frame (using a 4” gap above the changeable section of the sign). The Commission adjourned at 6:25 PM. Northampton Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes of Thursday April 28, 2011 Room 10, Second Floor City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Bruce Kriviskey, and Pauline Fogel. Marisa Labozzetta owned the meeting at 7:02 PM. 7:02 p.m. Public Hearing in Room 10, City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton, for a Determination of Appropriateness to remove one chimney each on Gillett and Northrop Houses, Smith College, 47-49 Elm Street (Map ID 31B-221). Charlie Conant and Peter LaPointe, Architect, from Smith College presented the plans. The work will include removal of one chimney for each building.  Removal of one chimney each on Gillett House and on Northrop House (which requires a certificate of appropriateness)  Cleaning brick and re-pointing as necessary and restoring cement wash on the chimneys on both buildings and (which would be eligible for a certificate of non-applicability but is being rolled into this project).  Replacement windows on both building (which would be eligible for a certificate of non- applicability but is also being rolled into this project). Replacement aluminum clad/wood interior windows will have simulated divided light with mullins exactly matching the historic windows.  Restoring  Exempt work including extensive interior work and an entrance not visible from a public way, removal of exterior fire escape on rear, removal of bulkheads and replacement with new basement door, all of which is exempt from the Historic District regulations. Commission discussed that overall the project will improve the historic integrity of the building, even with the loss of two chimneys. Upon motion by Pauline Fogel and second by Edy Ambrose, the Commission voted unanimously (4-0) to close the public hearing and issue a certificate of appropriateness for the proposed work as shown on the submitted plans and described herein. The Commission adjourned at 7:20 PM. Elm Street Historic Commission Hearing Thursday April 28, 2011 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing in Room 10, City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton, for a Determination of Appropriateness to remove one chimney each on Gillett and Northrop Houses, Smith College, 47-49 Elm Street (Map ID 31B-221). Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes DATE: Monday June 13, 2011 TIME: 3:30 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Others present: Wayne Feiden, Robert Jonas, Janet Gross, John Shennette, Ruth Constantine, Bill Corwin Agenda and Minutes 1.Round Hill Rd. Neighborhood Association presentation of concerns on historic preservation issues related to Clarke School surplusing The Commission had an open discussion with the public on the benefits of expanding the local historic district (historic preservation in an area that tells a story and add value to residential neighborhoods) and the disadvantages (add some challenges to redevelopment and regulatory challenges). They also discussed a possible ‘middle” ground of voluntary historic preservation restrictions on a few key buildings, focusing on the character defining features of those buildings, but not creating an expanded district. 2.Status of any further expansion of ESHD The Commission indicated by unanimous consent that they would like to continue to explore the option, with a focus on expanding the district to extend up Round Hill to the top of the hill. Staff offered to create a new map for this area, showing possible outlines and documenting contributing structures. The map will be circulated to property owners and to get a better sense of the interest. In the meantime, staff will meet with Clarke School and neighborhood representatives to explore options. 3.Discussion on Commission member status and election of officers The Commission recommended by unanimous consent that Historic Northampton nominate Martha Lyon as a full member representing them. They point off any action on electing officers. The Commission adjourned, by unanimous consent, at 5:30 PM. Elm Street Historic District Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday September 26, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Agenda 1.Approval of minutes of June 13, 2011 2.Round Hill Rd. Neighborhood Association presentation 3.Discussion of expansion of Elm Street Historic District to include Round Hill 4.Annual election of officers 5.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Elm Street Historic District Commission Meeting DATE: Monday September 26, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Others present: Wayne Feiden, Robert Jonas, Janet Gross, and Bill Corwin Agenda 1.Round Hill Rd. Neighborhood Association presentation Janet Gross and Robert Jonas presented the Round Hill Neighborhood Association’s draft of what a study committee report could look like. The Commission and the others present asked questions about proposed boundaries, benefits of a historic district versus other approaches, and the process necessary to move forward. 2.Discussion of expansion of Elm Street Historic District to include Round Hill The Commission discussed next steps. They agreed to read the draft report presented to them and discuss it at their next meetings, to be held at 3:00 on Monday October 3, 2011. At that meeting the Commission will focus on what are the character defining features that should be preserved, what the final map outline should be, and what information they need to complete a study committee report. 3.Approval of minutes of June 13, 2011 Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Edy Ambrose, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes. 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared The Commission briefly discussed the Certificate of Non-Applicability issued for 205 Elm Street window replacements and the Certificates that are likely to be issued for fencing at Northrop Gillett Houses and for Clark Hall window replacements. There was a consensus that the expedited permit process was working. Elm Street Historic District Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday October 3, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Agenda 1.Minutes of September 26, 2011 2.Discussion of draft Preliminary Report on possible expansion of Historic District to include portions of Round Hill and elsewhere. a.Identify character defining features b.Identify map of possible expansion c.Identify possible regulatory standards for any expansion 3.Annual election of officers 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Elm Street Historic District Commission Minutes DATE: Monday October 3, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Agenda 1.Minutes of September 26, 2011 2.Discussion of draft Preliminary Report on possible expansion of Historic District to include portions of Round Hill and elsewhere. a.Identify character defining features b.Identify map of possible expansion c.Identify possible regulatory standards for any expansion 3.Annual election of officers 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 3:00 PM. Minutes of September 26, 2011 Upon motion by Edy Ambrose and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of September 26, 2011 Discussion of draft Preliminary Report on possible Round Hill expansion of Historic District The Commission, with input from residents of the Round Hill area, discussed a possible preliminary report on an expansion of the Historic District to include Round Hill Road. They discussed when the design guidelines are simply guidelines and when the Commission can require project proponents to follow them. Wayne Feiden and Martha Lyon explained, that: 1.The Historic District Commission does NOT have any legal authority on some aspects of development. For example, landscaping, parking lots on the side and rear of buildings, preservation of existing trees, and density (i.e., total number of units or square footage of a building per acre) are NOT subject to Historic District jurisdiction, and so the guidelines are NOT requirements, simply suggestions. 2.The Historic District Commission DOES have legal authority over facades that are visible from a street, location and design of buildings to preserve historical character. In this area the Commission has the right to REQUIRE the Guidelines. Even here, however, the standards may NOT be used legally to go beyond legitimate historic preservation. For example, demanding that a building fit with its neighbors, including height and width, is exactly what your job is. But CAUTION, using this as an indirect excuse (which is what some people in the neighborhood might like) to limit the amount of development is NOT legal. For example, if a developer proposed a building with 400’ of continuous massing along Round Hill or Elm Street, it would be totally appropriate for the Historical Commission to deny it. But if the developer responded by proposing a building with the same massing along the road as its neighbors, but perhaps going deeper into the property, it would be very hard to legally deny (assuming that the facades respect all of the existing buildings). The Commission asked staff to take the report prepared by the nascent and informal Round Hill Neighborhood Association and revise it in the format of a DRAFT preliminary report for their review at their next meeting. Wayne Feiden suggested, and Martha Lyon agreed, that the report should include an assessment of all policy options for the area that can help preserve the historic character, and the commission agreed. The Commission also agreed on the working boundaries of the district expansion, subject to later change, to include all of the properties abutting on Round Hill Road from Elm Street to Bancroft and the first three properties westerly of Round Hill Road and southerly of Bancroft. Finally, the Commission agreed that, also subject to change, the regulatory standards in the current historic district ordinance and the design standards do not need to change to incorporate this new area, but that more discussion on this is appropriate as the process moves forward. th The Commission’s next meeting will be Monday November 7, at which point they will discuss the draft report. (Staff note: The draft report will be sent out to the Commission at least ten days th prior to the November 7 meeting, and hopefully earlier.) The Commission adjourned at 4:10 PM. Historic District Commission DATE: Monday November 7, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Agenda 1.Minutes of October 3, 2011 2.Discussion of “DRAFT Preliminary Report, Historic District Expansion: Round Hill, Historic District Commission” distributed to Historic District Commission members (and available at www.NorthamptonMA.gov on the public file cabinet, under Planning, Historic, Local Historic District) at least 10 days prior to the meeting) 3.Plan public outreach and public meeting on DRAFT Preliminary Report 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Historic District Commission DATE: Monday November 7, 2011 TIME: 3:00 PM PLACE: 210 Main Street, Room 10, Northampton (City Hall) Minutes Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogal, and Bruce Kriviskey Others present: Wayne Feiden, Hedy Rose, Janet Gross, Dick Green, and Bill Gerrit Stover Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 3:00 PM. 1.Minutes of October 3, 2011 Upon motion by Pauline Fogal and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of October 3, 2011. 2.Discussion of “DRAFT Preliminary Report, Historic District Expansion: Round Hill, Historic District Commission” Marisa Labozzetta reported that we have received updated or new Historic Inventory Form Bs for most, although not all, of the properties in the proposed district expansion. The Commission reviewed the draft report and made specific comments to be incorporated into the draft report for the community public meeting. {Said revised report is available at www.NorthamptonMA.gov, public file cabinet, Planning, Historic, Local Historic District} The Commission set the date for a public meeting on the draft report for January 9, 2012 at 7:00 {in the Northampton High School Little Theater}. Staff will send a notice of the hearing to all property owners in the proposed new sections of the district. The Commission adjourned at 4:45. Historic District Commission Proposed Expansion of Historic District to Round Hill Public Forum Agenda and Minutes DATE: Monday January 9, 2012 TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: Northampton High School Little Theater Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, and Bruce Kriviskey The meeting opened at 7:05 PM. 34 members of the community attended the public forum. Wayne Feiden, Director of Planning and Development presented the application. There were several questions on the report, the options for historical preservation, and the potential impacts of a redevelopment of the Clarke School campus. No action was taken at the meeting. The Commission adjourned at 8:50 PM> Agenda Presentation 1. Proposed expansion of the Elm Street Historic District to including portions of Round Hill a.Proposed Preliminary Study Report b.Proposed district expansion 2.Public questions, comments and dialogue on proposed expansion 3.Historic District Commission discussion 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Historic District Commission DATE: Thursday March 1, 2012 TIME: 4:30 PM PLACE: Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton Agenda 1.Minutes of January 9, 2012 and November 7, 2011 2.Adoption of March 1, 2012 Preliminary Study Report: Elm Street Historic District Round Hill Expansion 3.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Historic District Commission DATE: Thursday March 1, 2012 TIME: 4:30 PM PLACE: Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edythe Ambrose, Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogel, and Bruce Kriviskey Agenda and Minutes 1.Adoption of March 1, 2012 Preliminary Study Report: Elm Street Historic District Round Hill Expansion The Commission went through the Preliminary Study report page by page and discussed it among themselves and with members of the public. Based on the input they received they made a series of changes to the report. The final preliminary report is attached by reference incorporating these changes. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to adopt the preliminary study report as revised. Once staff makes the changes (in approximately two weeks) it will go out for comment and begin the formal 60 day review period. 2.Minutes of January 9, 2012 and November 7, 2011 Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of January 9, 2012 and November 7, 2011 3.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared  All the members indicated that they would be happy to have their terms renewed as their current terms expire Historic District Commission DATE: Thursday March 22, 2012 TIME: 4:30 PM PLACE: Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton Agenda 1.Minutes of March 1, 2012 2.4:30 PM Public Hearing on request for new windows and house expansion at 218 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-101) 3.Any necessary follow up on the Preliminary Study Report: Elm Street Historic District Round Hill Expansion 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Historic District Commission 4:30 PM, Thursday March 22, 2012, Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton: Public Hearing on request for new windows and house expansion at 218 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-101) TO: Historic District Commission (Elm Street) FROM: Wayne Feiden, FAICP, Director of Planning and Development RE: Public Hearing (Map ID 31A-101-001) 218 Elm Street (Northeast corner Elm Street and Harrison Avenue) Proposed project, issues, and staff recommendation DATE: February 29, 2012 Please note that staff recommendations are based on the paper record. The applicant may present other information that could be persuasive. Current westerly window proposed for replacement on the Harrison Avenue elevation:  The current window does NOT have good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed replacement is marginally better than the current window.  Recommendation: Approve . While it would be desirable to have better proportions and rhythm, even a subtle improvement is still an improvement. Current easterly window proposed for replacement on Harrison Avenue:  The current window has good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed window does not. It will not line up nor match the window above it and is very visible from the street.  Recommendation: Approve ONLY if the window is the same size and vertical alignment as the window above it. Current window on easterly side of the house, still visible from Harrison Avenue  The current window has good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed window does not. It will not line up nor is it centered with the window above it.  Recommendation: Approve ONLY if the window is centered below the window above it. Converting a porch to living space on the northerly side of the housing, a small portion of which is visible from Harrison Avenue.  The portion facing north that is not visible from a road is exempt.  Generally the design standards oppose converting porches to living space, but I believe the primary intention for this is for porches facing a street.  Otherwise the proportions mostly work.  Recommendation: Approve with whatever conditions, if any, the board finds appropriate. Historic District Commission DATE: Thursday March 22, 2012 TIME: 4:30 PM PLACE: Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Pauline Fogel, Martha Lyon, and Bruce Kriviskey Agenda and Minutes Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 4:30 PM. 1.4:30 PM Public Hearing on request for new windows and house expansion at 218 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-101) Thomas Dadmun presented the application on behalf of the property owners, Rachel Simpson and Kenneth Hellman. He pointed that while the home itself is historic the existing windows that are proposed for replacement are not and questions the historic value and integrity of the back of the structure. Lining up the new windows with the existing windows is not practical to serve the internal needs of the building. Staff report and recommendations (based on memo submitted to applicant and Commission prior to the meeting, with unclear or errors in direction correction): Current small window proposed for replacement on the Harrison Avenue elevation:  The current window does NOT have good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed replacement is marginally better than the current window.  Recommendation: Approve . While it would be desirable to have better proportions and rhythm, even a subtle improvement is still an improvement. Current large window proposed for replacement on Harrison Avenue:  The current window has good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed window does not. It will not line up nor match the window above it and is very visible from the street. (15” offset, per Thomas Dadmun)  Recommendation: Approve ONLY if the window is the same size and vertical alignment as the window above it. Current window on end of the house, still visible from Harrison Avenue  The current window has good proportions, rhythm and spacing.  The proposed window does not. It will not line up nor is it centered with the window above it.  Recommendation: Approve ONLY if the window is centered below the window above it. Converting a porch to living space, a small portion of which is visible from Harrison Avenue.  The portion facing north that is not visible from a road is exempt.  Generally the design standards oppose converting porches to living space, but I believe the primary intention for this is for porches facing a street.  Otherwise the proportions mostly work.  Recommendation: Approve with whatever conditions, if any, the board finds appropriate. Edy Ambrose suggested that if the kitchen window can’t be lined up with the second floor window perhaps it is possible to move the second floor window as well so that the windows still line up after the construction project. She said that the inside and outside of the house should be designed together and the outside is as important as the inside. Bruce Kriviskey said that windows not lining up is slightly jarring, but the other details of the site are all well thought out and does not create problems. Martha Lyon asked if the kitchen windows could be spaced to keep them lined up or if a “fake” façade window could be used to keep the appearance attractive. Bruce said it can be done with closed shutters, although from a preservation point of view a fake façade is not that effective. The applicant indicated that they understood the less than perfect window layout and wanted to meet the design concerns, but was challenged by making a small kitchen layout work. Windows planned are simulated divided light, with wood clad on the outside and a spacer bar, which would allow the elimination of exterior storm windows. The Commission agreed that the window models themselves are consistent with what they have approved in the past. One neighbor supported the applicant. Otherwise there was no public comment. Upon motion by Edy Abrose and second by Martha Lyon the Commission voted unanimously to close the public approve the requested plan, as presented, except that: 1.The new larger window on the Harrison Avenue façade be installed to align along the center of the window with the center of the window above it. 2.The back of the house (at a 90’ angle to Harrison Avenue) façade have two lower windows align up with two of the upper windows (same width and horizontal location). Final plans to be approved by the Office of Planning and Development to ensure they are consistent with this approval prior to recording this permit. 2.Minutes of March 1, 2012 By unanimous consent, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of March 1, 2012. 3.Any necessary follow up on the Preliminary Study Report: Elm Street Historic District Round Hill Expansion Wayne Feiden, updated the Commission on the status of the report (submitted to Massachusetts Historical Commission, Northampton Planning Board, and the Northampton Historical Commission). Janet Gross expressed some concerns with the preliminary report, especially not including Hubbard as a top preservation priority, and whether the report implies support for changing the westerly limits of the proposed historic district, and what she believes are some errors on the Form Bs. (See attached notes recorded with these minutes.) 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared The Commission adjourned at 5:45 PM. Historic District Commission Proposed Expansion of Historic District to Round Hill Public Forum Agenda and Minutes DATE: Monday January 9, 2012 TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: Northampton High School Little Theater Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, and Bruce Kriviskey The meeting opened at 7:05 PM. 34 members of the community attended the public forum. Wayne Feiden, Director of Planning and Development presented the application. There were several questions on the report, the options for historical preservation, and the potential impacts of a redevelopment of the Clarke School campus. No action was taken at the meeting. The Commission adjourned at 8:50 PM> Agenda Presentation 1. Proposed expansion of the Elm Street Historic District to including portions of Round Hill a.Proposed Preliminary Study Report b.Proposed district expansion 2.Public questions, comments and dialogue on proposed expansion 3.Historic District Commission discussion 4.Other necessary business not reasonably anticipated when agenda prepared Wayne Feiden From:Bill Corwin [bcorwin@clarkeschools.org] Sent:Monday, May 21, 2012 1:55 PM To:Wayne Feiden Subject:Fwd: Historic District Comments Wayne, Clarke's comments are below. If you need these in a print version, or on letterhead, please let me know. Thank you, Bill Bill Corwin President Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech www.clarkeschools.org 413 584-3450 Clarke has strong concerns about the proposed Historic District. It is an unduly restrictive approach, essentially targeted at a single entity, that does not serve the best interests of the City. Clarke is by far the single biggest landowner affected by this proposed designation, and our need to convey much of our property is what spurred this proposed restriction. As the city and Clarke's neighbors know, Clarke has been engaged in a process for over a year of moving to transition much of our property to new ownership. Last year Clarke issued a request for proposals, rather than simply offering the property to the highest bidder. The reason for this is that Clarke has an interest in trying to maintain the general feel of the neighborhood, both because we believe in being a good neighbor and because we will continue to remain on part of the current campus. We selected a developer, Opal, whose plans were the most favorable among the proposals received in terms of preserving the look of the buildings and the grounds. We continue to work with that developer and hope to move things forward shortly. However, no transaction is final until the conveyance takes place. In the event that we are unable to finalize things with Opal, a historic district designation will greatly limit our ability to convey the property in a way that will preserve the overall feel of the neighborhood. Given the other proposals received by Clarke, it seems clear that the restrictions imposed by a historic district designation would make it more likely that the property would be developed by someone who would use the existing open space for more housing in order to make such a project financially viable. Also, the longer it takes for Clarke to convey the property to someone else, the less likely we will be able to maintain the grounds and buildings in the way they have been maintained. That is certainly not the result being sought by such a designation, but that would be the likely outcome if we are not able to transition the property to someone else in the near future. Similarly, any potentially large property tax revenues to the City from the sale of such a property would be delayed. The city has already calculated that the current proposed use of the property would result in a substantial net gain of revenue for Northampton. A restrictive designation such as the one proposed has the potential to limit or eliminate such a gain, to the general detriment of the city. 1 We feel strongly that the restrictions that would be imposed by a historic district designation would unduly impair Clarke's ability to convey the property smoothly. We understand the interest in retaining the feel of the neighborhood. We feel that we have acted to retain that same feel in our past property sales and in our approach to the sale of the larger part of campus. We also believe that not only Clarke but the entire city has an interest in seeing a smooth transition of Clarke's property to new ownership. A restriction of the kind that this designation would impose is an extreme approach to an issue that could be addressed in more moderate and reasonable ways. With regard to arguments that property values would increase, that may or may not be valid for single family homes, but to claim that that is the case for a group of buildings like Clarke's is simply without any foundation. The fact is that such a designation will discourage and deter many possible purchasers from pursuing the property. Again, we believe that achieving some preservation of the feel of the campus and neighborhood could be effectively accomplished with a less restrictive and burdensome approach than a historic district designation. We would welcome a discussion of such a possible collaboration, and would encourage the Committee and the City to pursue a more moderate path. Bill Corwin President Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech 2 Historic District Commission 4:30 PM, Thursday March 22, 2012, Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main Street, Northampton: Public Hearing on request for new windows and house expansion at 218 Elm Street (Map ID 31A-101) Historic District Commission Public Hearing Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension When: 7:00 PM, Monday May 21, 2012 Where: City Council Chambers, 212 Main Street, Northampton Why: To discuss the extending the Elm Street Historic District up Round Hill Road Questions: Wayne Feiden at WFeiden@NorthamptonMA.gov Minutes Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair) and Edy Ambrose Marisa Labozzetta opened the public hearing at 7:02 PM. Wayne Feiden presented the issues: Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road 1. Summarizing the preliminary plan, “ Extension, Preliminary Study Report ” available at www.NorthamptonMA.gov/OPD. 2.Reporting recommendations and correspondence received a.The Northampton Planning Board endorsed the report, including either creating a local historic district or historic preservation restrictions on the most critical buildings. b.The Massachusetts Historical Commission endorsed the report and the creation of a local historic district, and recommended the commission consider a further extension of the district. c.The Northampton Historical Commission recommended the creation of a local historic district. d.Clarke School expressed concern about the local historic district and the timing of when a district is enacted. 3.The option of negotiating an agreement with Clarke School where they agree not to demolish any building or apply for any permit to alter any façade visible from a public way without 90 days notice. That would provide City Council sufficient time to adopt an ordinance, removing any time pressure to move on adopting an ordinance before determining if the propose developer of the Clarke property is able to move forward. 4.Opal Realty, the prospective purchaser of the majority of the Clarke School property, has indicated that they have no objection to a historic district, but they have not yet signed a purchase and sale agreement. Marisa Labozzetta then opened the hearing for public comment and questions. Janet Gross asked for more explanation of how the 90 days would work. Answer: It be a legally binding commitment that would be designed to make sure that no alteration or demolition could happen in that 90 day window. Charles Robertson expressed concern about the possibility of not including the power plant area in any historic district. Michael Clancy also expressed concerned about not including the power plant area and suggested that it is an integral part of the district. Beth Smion asked if new buildings would be required to be approved in a historic district. Answer: New buildings are allowed but the design has to be approved to ensure compatibility. Tom Duredee said that he had not heard a compelling reason not to include the power plant area in a historic district. Sarah Metcalf added her support to including the power plant area in a historic district, pointing out that since new buildings are permitted the burden is not great. She expressed concern that using historic preservation restrictions instead of a historic district to preserve buildings would not necessarily have the same level of community dialogue. Ann Alexander also added support for including the power plant area. She went on to express concern that a developer could someday extend Langworthy out to Bancroft. Jane Rini said that Langworthy could only be extended if the City took land by eminent domain. Councilor Paul Spector stressed that it could be hard for him to garner the other five votes (its takes six votes to adopt a historic district) if councilors saw a historic district as making it harder to get the Clarke School property redeveloped and a neighborhood not open to some compromise. James McDonald asked if Opal could build in the power plant area under zoning. Answer: yes, but zoning limits the total number of units on the property and so it depends on what Opal or any other developer is planning to do elsewhere. Maureen Flannery suggested that the real concern for certain areas, especially the power plant area, is preserving open space and the best option would be a commitment to keep this land open. Jennifer Addis suggested that a historic district should be adopted regardless of whether Opal or some other entity buys Clarke School surplus properties. Robert Jonas also supported a historic districts and one that covers the power plant area. Janet Gross said she supported a historic district over historic preservation restrictions. She said that a historic district is more than about individual buildings but about preserving the overall historic theme of Round Hill. Hedy supported a historic district regardless of who purchases the surplus land at Clarke School. Bill Corwin, Clarke School, explained how Clarke went through a RFP process do find a developer who would purchase the property and preserve the character of the neighborhood, a neighborhood in which Clarke intends to remain for many year. He stressed that Opal’s proposal was by far the strongest proposal they received to preserve the area and that he believes that project will go forward. He expressed concern, however, that a historic district could make it harder to find a replacement developer IF and only if Opal didn’t move forward, which would make it harder to preserve and even maintain the buildings on site. He suggested a less heavy handed approach at least until Opal closes on the property. William Albrighten asked if Clarke was willing to consider committing to providing 90 days before any demolition or alteration permit is applied for to provide some breathing room. Bill Corwin said that they would certainly be happy to consider and discuss such an approach. Bud Fine complained that Clarke School did not contact the neighbors earlier enough or often enough and complained that redeveloping the property for rental housing would destroy the neighborhood and turn it into a low income transient neighborhood. Councilor Spector stressed that the City finances are dire that that good high quality development is what the city wants and that it would be hard to get other councilors to support a historic district if there is not some compromise to preserve the historic integrity of the neighborhood and attract the reinvestment that Clarke School needs. Ruth Constantine, Smith College, suggested postponing adoption of a historic district until Opal Realty moves forward to purchase the property. She also asked if incompatible buildings can be demolished in a historic district. Answer: Yes, but we have not had requests for this in the past so we can’t give examples of where this has happened. Suzanne Beck, Greater Northampton Chamber of Commerce, also suggested postponing a historic district until Opal moves forward. She said that the Chamber is only taking a position on the timing and not on a historic district, but asked whether a historic district is the right fit for this site. Janet Gross said that she is troubled by the view that a historic district can be a heavy handed regulation. A Crescent Street abutter said that he didn’t trust the developer. Charles Robertson asked whether the three buildings (power plant and its two abutting service buildings) could be exempted. Answer: Not in an ordinance but if the ordinance passed they could request a permit to demolish. Sarah Metcalf said that she had always heard that historic districts add to property values, and that should more than make up for any regulatory burdens. Jane Rini said that she didn’t trust Clarke or Opal to make the right decisions and for that reason the city needs a historic district. Edy Ambrose, Historic District Commission, said that she didn’t think it made sense to hold off waiting for Opal to purchase much of Clarke School unless there was a firm agreement to ensure that no project gets grandfathered. The Historic District Commission closed the public hearing and adjourned at 8:25 PM. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Monday June 18, 2012 Where: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street, Room 11, Northampton Why: To discuss the extending the Elm Street Historic District up Round Hill Road Questions: Wayne Feiden at WFeiden@NorthamptonMA.gov AGENDA 1.Minutes of May 21 and March 22, 2012 2.Staffing issues and discussion of possible merger of Historic District Commission and Historical Commission. 3.4:45 PM Public Hearing on a replacement front door at John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. 4.5:00 PM discussion and possible action on Historic District Study Committee Report for a possible expansion of the historic district up Round Hill Road. 5.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 4:45 PM, Monday 6/18/12, City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street on a request for a replacement front door at John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Monday June 18, 2012 Where: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street, Room 11, Northampton Why: To discuss the extending the Elm Street Historic District up Round Hill Road Questions: Wayne Feiden at WFeiden@NorthamptonMA.gov AGENDA 1.Minutes of May 21 and March 22, 2012 2.Staffing issues and discussion of possible merger of Historic District Commission and Historical Commission. 3.4:45 PM Public Hearing on a replacement front door at John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. 4.5:00 PM discussion and possible action on Historic District Study Committee Report for a possible expansion of the historic district up Round Hill Road. 5.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. MINUTES Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Pauline Fogel, Martha Lyon, and Bruce Kriviskey Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 4:00 PM. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of March 22 and May 21, 2012 The Commission discussed a possible merger of the Historic District Commission and the Historical Commission. Marisa Labozzetta expressed her concerns about merging two boards with mixed missions, the need for the District Commission’s expertise, and the concern that many commissioners might not want to serve on a merged board. Wayne Feiden explained why staff losses in the last few years have created a staffing shortage that drives this request, and that there are synergies for staff time savings and board expertise that come from mergers Board members weighed in with their thoughts. Marissa asked which members might be willing to serve on a new combined Historic Commission. Edy Ambrose and Pauline Fogel said that they would certainly consider it. Martha Lyon and Marisa Labozzetta said they probably would not serve, although Martha suggested serving until the end of term to provide some board transition. Bruce Kriviskey already serves on both commissions. At 4:45 PM Marisa Labozzetta opened the Public Hearing on the Trustees of Smith College’s request to John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. install new doors at Francis Aquadro, the applicant/contractor representing Smith College, presented the application. He explained that Smith wanted a smaller door (reducing the height of the door and replacing a 3” deep door with a 2” deep door) to reduce the weight and make it easier to handle, and deterioration in the bottom of the door and the door jams make this the right time to do the work. They would reuse the metal grate on the door but reduce it from 8 rows to 5 to fit on the smaller door. The District Commission indicated that the door respected the design of the old door in many ways, but was not as proportional to the building as a whole and lost some of the historical character of the building. The reported that both the National Park Service historic rehabilitation standards and the Elm Street design standards have a strong preference to remove and rehabilitate the door and repair or replace the door jams and not to replace the door. They indicated that a rehabilitation of the door would not need a permit from the Commission. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to continue the hearing to Monday July 9, 2012 in Room 10, of City Hall, 210 Main Street, Northampton. At that time they wanted evidence that the door could not be rehabilitated and otherwise they indicated that they would probably not approve the work as proposed. At 5:05 PM Marisa Labozzetta opened the discussion on the Historic District Study Committee Report. Wayne Feiden, Marisa Labozzetta, and Edy Ambrose reported on the public hearing. Feiden reported that there appeared to be clear residential neighborhood support for a historic district expansion, with strong opposition from Clarke School and several voices (Clarke, Chamber, and Smith) for delaying the process to determine whether Opal Realty ends up purchasing the property. IF Opal purchases the majority of Clarke’s property, Opal is in support of a historic district and there would then be near universal support. IF Opal does not purchase the property, then there would be a strong disagreement and City Council would ultimately need to make the decision. Delaying the vote now until it is clear, but in such a way that avoids the risk of a proposal becoming “grandfathered” before an ordinance is in effect, would avoid what may be an unnecessary protracted debate. Feiden distributed a draft Standstill and Notice Agreement between the Historic District Commission and Clarke School under which the decision would be postponed six months without any risk of anticipatory grandfathering occuring: 1. The Historic District Commission would agree not to approve a district until January 1, 2013. 2. Clarke would agree for themselves and their successors not to apply for any permit for demolition or alteration of a historic structure visible from a public way (the things that would be regulated by a historic district) until April 1, 2013. 3. If both parties agree, the agreement can be canceled or extended. The Historic District Commission agreed in concept and asked that the agreement be finalized and sent to the City Solicitor, for final Historic District Commission consideration at their next meeting. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Edy Ambrose, the Commission adjourned at 5:45 PM. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Tuesday July 10, 2012 Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of June 18, 2012 2.4:00 PM Continuation on the Public Hearing on a replacement front door at John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. 3.Consideration of a Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School to freeze demolition or permit applications on Clarke School property for nine months and freeze action on a historic district for six months 4.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Tuesday July 10, 2012 Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of June 18, 2012 2.4:00 PM Continuation on the Public Hearing on a replacement front door at John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Street, Map ID: 31B-252. 3.Consideration of a Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School to freeze demolition or permit applications on Clarke School property for nine months and freeze action on a historic district for six months 4.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. MINUTES Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Edy Ambrose, Martha Lyon, and Bruce Kriviskey Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 4:00 PM. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of June 18, 2012 At 4:05 PM Marisa Labozzetta opened the continuation of the Public Hearing on the Trustees of John M. Greene Hall at Smith College, 6o Elm Smith College’s request to install new doors at Street, Map ID: 31B-252. (Originally continued to July 9, 2012. On July 9, 2012 at 4:00 there was written and oral announcement of continuation to July 10, 2012.) Francis Aquadro, contractor, and James Lucy, Smith College, explained the need for panic hardware, that limits the weight of the door and the size to about nine feet. They discussed options (more door height and vertical elements) Upon motion by Bruce Krivisky and by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project, with the following conditions: 1. The doors shall be no less than approximately (give or take a few inches) nine feet tall. 2. The retained iron grill on the new doors shall have at least one additional row (two preferred) beyond that shown on the submitted plans. 3. The vertical trim shown on the door shall extend to the top of the doors. 4. The new exterior hardware on the doors shall match the color of the mahogany doors. Marisa Labozzetta opened the discussion on a Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School (attached hereto by reference). Wayne Feiden presented the proposed agreement under which the Historic District Commission would agree not to send the Round Hill Historic District Study Report and Ordinance to City Council until January 1, 2013 and Clarke would agree not to demolish or alter any building that would be subject to a historic district, if one was in effect, until April 1, 2013. The Commission, Clarke School’s representative, and four neighborhood representatives discussed the agreement and related issues. The Commission agreed that the agreement should be revised to include new building construction, not simply alterations to existing buildings, if that new construction would otherwise be covered by a Historic District. Upon a question by Edy Ambrose, neighborhood representatives said that they were comfortable with this approach and it gave them the protection they want while Clarke finalizes their prospective sale of the majority of their campus. Edy Ambrose asked if signing the agreement gave the Commission any additional liability. Wayne Feiden reported that it was reviewed and approved by the City Solicitor and that board members have the same liability for this that they do in any policy or permit action, that is board members are responsible for their own civil rights violations but not for policy actions (in this case an action approved by the City Solicitor). Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Edy Ambrose the Commission voted unanimously to sign the final Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School. The members then signed and gave the Agreement to Clarke School for their consideration on July 11, 2012. Bill Corwin for Clarke School agreed to hold the Agreement in escrow and sign it if his board approved it within a few days and otherwise return it to the city. Upon motion by Marisa Labozzetta and second by Bruce Kriviskey the Commission adjourned at 5:10PM STANDSTILL AND NOTICE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ______ day of July 2012, by and between the HISTORIC DISTRIC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON, 210 Main Street, Northampton, MA 01060, a duly constituted commission under G. L. c. 40D acting by and through its Members hereinafter (“the COMMISSION”); and THE CLARKE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF dba Clarke Schools For Hearing and Speech, of 47 Round Hill Road, Northampton, MA 01060 (hereinafter “CLARKE”) WHEREAS CLARKE is in the process of deaccessioning some of its properties in furtherance of its mission to provide deaf and hard of hearing children with listening, learning and spoken language skills at several locations throughout the country; and WHEREAS CLARKE is in the process of securing an agreement with the developer, Opal, for the master development of the principal buildings and property that are to be sold to Opal under such agreement; and WHEREAS Opal is in the process of discussing its proposed development with the COMMISSION and its Planning Department and Historic District Commission; and WHEREAS the COMMISSION is in the process of developing plans and ordinances that would include virtually all of the buildings and property of CLARKE within an expanded Elm Street Historic District; and WHEREAS CLARKE is opposed to the adoption of an ordinance that would include all of its buildings and properties within an expanded Elm Street Historic district; and WHEREAS Opal as the prospective developer has been discussing its development plans with the COMMISSION in a context that would recognize and accept inclusion of the property and buildings proposed to be conveyed to Opal from CLARKE; and WHEREAS the COMMISSION has an interest in both preserving the character of the buildings and neighborhood and in the smooth and orderly transition of the Clarke property to a buyer; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and covenants herein, the COMMISSION and CLARKE agree as follows: 1.The COMMISSION will continue its discussions with Opal and CLARKE for the development and preservation of the buildings and property proposed to be conveyed and included in an expanded Elm Street Historic District, but will hold any action towards approval or adoption of such a district until and after January 1, 2013. 2.CLARKE and its successors in interest will not seek to demolish, renovate or otherwise alter the façade or rooflines or any new construction that would be subject to Historic District regulations of any building until and after April 1, 2013, excepting: a.The new driveway and parking lot proposed by CLARKE, shown on the attached sketch plan. b.Any project by Opal Realty that does not demolish, renovate or otherwise alter the facades or rooflines visible from a public way, or that makes minor alterations of such facades or rooflines where such alterations are specifically approved by the Historic District Commission. 3.This Agreement will terminate and all promises and obligations hereunder shall cease on April 1, 2013. This Agreement may be extended or terminated at any point by mutual agreement of both the COMMISSION and CLARKE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their respective hands and seals. Executed as a sealed instrument this _________ day of July, 2012. ELM STREET THE CLARKE SCHOOL FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION THE DEAF _____________________________ ___________________________ Marissa Labozzetta, Chair its President duly authorized Martha Lyon, Member Edythe Ambroz, Member Pauline Fogel, Member Bruce Kriviskey, Member Historic District Commission 5:00 PM Fri. Jan. 4, 2013, Room 10, City Hall (second floor) 210 Main St., Northampton: Public Hearing on request from Smith College for demolition of a small addition that houses a cooler, infill addition under the front overhangs, and small exterior changes at Cutter-Ziskind Houses (79-91 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-201 & 904). ,MWXSVMG(MWXVMGX 'SQQMWWMSR 41*VM.ER 6SSQ'MX],EPP WIGSRHµSSV 1EMR 7X2SVXLEQTXSR4YFPMG ,IEVMRKSRVIUYIWXJVSQ 7QMXL'SPPIKIJSVHIQSPMXMSR SJEWQEPPEHHMXMSRXLEX LSYWIWEGSSPIVMR´PP EHHMXMSRYRHIVXLIJVSRX SZIVLERKWERHWQEPP I\XIVMSVGLERKIWEX'YXXIV >MWOMRH,SYWIW )PQ 7XVIIX1ET-(&    (IGIQFIV  Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Friday January 4, 2013 (amended version) Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of July 10, 2012 2.Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension: Final Study Report a.Consider extending Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School by two months; and/or b.Consider adopting Final Study Report, possibly with directions not to send to City Council for two months 3.Follow-up discussion on merger of Historic District Commission and Historical Commission 4.Discussion of planned street signage on Elm Street 5.5:00 PM Public Hearing on request by Smith College for a Certificate of Applicability for proposed exterior façade work at Cutter and Ziskind Houses (79-91 Elm Street, Map ID 31B- 201 and 904) 6.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Friday January 4, 2013 Where: City Hall Hearing Room 18, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of July 10, 2012 2.Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension: Final Study Report a.Consider extending Standstill and Notice Agreement with Clarke School by two months; and/or b.Consider adopting Final Study Report, possibly with directions not to send to City Council for two months 3.Follow-up discussion on merger of Historic District Commission and Historical Commission 4.Discussion of planned street signage on Elm Street 5.5:00 PM Public Hearing on request by Smith College for a Certificate of Applicability for proposed exterior façade work at Cutter and Ziskind Houses (79-91 Elm Street, Map ID 31B- 201 and 904) 6.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. MINUTES Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogel, and Bruce Kriviskey Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 4:00 PM. Minutes of July 10, 2012: Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of July 10, 2012, correcting two typographical errors in the draft previously distributed. Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension: Final Study Report The Commission discussed the draft study report and the expectation that Opal will hear about their application for historic tax credits for a portion of the Clarke School campus in March. Bill Corwin from Clarke School said that Clarke would be happy to extend the Standstill and Notice Agreement by 90 days, whereas the Commission agrees not to vote on the final study report until April 1, 2013 and Clarke agrees to ensure that no buildings are altered or demolished on the campus for an additional 90 days. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to extend the Standstill and Notice Agreement my 90 days. Follow-up discussion on merger of Historic District Commission and Historical Commission After discussing the proposed ordinance, and upon motion by Pauline Fogel and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously (4-0) to sponsor and support the proposed ordinance merging the two boards. David Drake, Historical Commission chair, discussed some of the current Historical Commission projects to provide some context for the merger. Discussion of planned street signage on Elm Street Wayne Feiden brought the Commission up-to-date on the signage options (rapid rectangular beacon and crosswalk and advance crosswalk signage being considered on Elm Street so that Commission members would not be surprised when signage is installed. Commission members suggested that black poles would be more in keeping with the district. St. Mary’s Scaffolding Under other necessary business, Commission members asked if anyone knew the status of the scaffolding at St. Mary’s Church and asked whether this requires a permit from the Commission. Staff will check with the Building Commissioner and report back to the Commission 5:00 PM Public Hearing on request by Smith College for a Certificate of Applicability for proposed exterior façade work at Cutter and Ziskind Houses (79-91 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-201 and 904) Marisa Labozzetta opened the public hearing at 5:00 PM. Charlie Conant from Smith College presented the application and the plans. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the requested permit. Historic District Commission When: 3:00 PM, Monday April 1, 2013 Where: City Hall Hearing Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of January 4, 2013 2.Action on Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension: Final Study Report 3.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. MINUTES Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Martha Lyon, Pauline Fogel, and Bruce Kriviskey Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 3:00 PM. Public Comment There was no public comment other than comments about the Round Hill extension (below). Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Extension Demetrious Panteleakis reported that the first round of tax credits for the first phase of the project, converting Rogers and Hubbard to residential apartments, has been approved and Opal plans to move forward on their purchase on most of the Clarke School campus on or about April 17, 2013. The project, which they are calling Historic Round Hill Summit, will go to construction drawings and construction will begin later in 2013. The Commission discussed with Mr. Panteleakis, Janet Gross, a neighbor, and City Councilor Paul Spector whether the district should encompass all of the Clarke School campus or end at two non-contributing buildings (a garage and boiler building) and not include the steep westerly portion of the property. The Commissioners discussed keeping that area within the district, as included in the draft final report, as part of maintaining the integrity of the district. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the Final Study Report for the Elm Street Historic District: Round Hill Road Extension. Minutes of January 4, 2013 Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of January 4, 2013. Historic District Commission When: 4:00 PM, Monday May 20, 2013 Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of April 1, 2013 2.4:00 PM Public Hearing: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for replacement windows on the north and east side of Wesley Dorm, Smith College, Elm Street. 3.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. MINUTES Members present: Pauline Fogel, Martha Lyon (vice chair), and Bruce Kriviskey. Martha Lyon opened the meeting at 4:00 PM with the 4:00 PM Public Hearing: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for replacement windows on the north and east side of Wesley Dorm, Smith College, Elm Street. Tom Meyer, Paramount Project Management, and Laura Fitch, architect, presented the application and explained the plans. Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Bruce Kriviskey, the Commission voted unanimously to close the public hearing. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project, as shown in the plans and the application. The Commission adjourned at 4:20 PM. Historic District Commission 1.6:00 PM, Mon. July 1, 2013 Public Hearing, City Hall Rm 10, 210 Main St, Northampton: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for fiberglass panels on Helens Hills Hills Chapel, 123 Elm St, Map ID 31B-193, to allow installation of wireless antenna inside the steeple. Historic District Commission When: 6:00 PM, Monday July 1, 2013 Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.Minutes of April 1, 2013 and May 20, 2013 2.6:00 PM Public Hearing: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for fiberlass panels on Hells Hills Hills Chapel, 123 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-193, to allow installation of ATT wireless antenna inside the steeple. 3.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. Historic District Commission When: 6:00 PM, Monday July 1, 2013 Where: City Hall Room 10, 210 Main Street, Northampton AGENDA 1.6:00 PM Public Hearing: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for fiberlass panels on Helen Hills Hills Chapel, 123 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-193, to allow installation of ATT wireless antenna inside the steeple. 2.Minutes of April 1, 2013 and May 20, 2013 3.Any other items not anticipated when agenda written. Minutes Members present: Marisa Labozzetta (chair), Martha Lyon, and Pauline Fogel. Staff present: Wayne Feiden Marisa Labozzetta opened the meeting at 6:00 PM. 6:00 PM Public Hearing: Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for fiberglass panels on Helen Hills Hills Chapel, 123 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-193, to allow installation of ATT wireless antenna inside the steeple. Marisa Labozzetta opened the public hearing at 6:00 PM. Brian Allan, KJK Wireless, presented the application. He explained that: 1.All antennas will be within the church steeple, with the only exterior change being changing wood panels to identical fiberglass panels. 2.Wiring will be internal to the church, then an underground conduit to the basement of 115 Elm Street, none of which will be exterior to the building or above the parking lot. 3.Equipment will be in the basement of 115 Elm Street. The only exterior connection will be a simple electrical connection to allow running of equipment during power failures that extend beyond the capacity of installed batteries. 4.The only exterior installation will be two air conditioning air compressors behind 115 Elm Street and not visible from any public way. Upon motion by Pauline Fogel and second by Martha Lyon, the Commission voted unanimously (3-0) to close the public hearing and issue a Certificate of Appropriateness based on the application and the above description of the project. Minutes of April 1, 2013 and May 20, 2013 Upon motion by Martha Lyon and second by Pauline Fogel, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes. Any other items not anticipated when agenda written Wayne Feiden provided the Commission with a brief update on the Historic District expansion up Round Hill Road (passed by City Council on June 27, 2013 and in effect as of the Mayor’s signing the ordinance on July 1, 2013), and the merger of the Historic District Commission and Historic Commission (pending before City Council and ready to move forward when we get required nominations from AIA, Historic Northampton, and Board of Realtors). Commission members discussed an apparent failure of 264 Elm Street to obtain a Certificate for their new air conditioning compressor and related external duct work. The Building Commission is following up with the property owner and will instruct them as to their requirements under the ordinance. The Commission adjourned at 6:40 PM.