Loading...
2010 Historical Commission minutes Northampton Historical Commission Minutes and Agenda DATE: Monday, January 25, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM PLACE: City Hall Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton (use rear door) Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of December 28, 2009 3.CPC Application from State Hospital Fountain Committee 4.CPC Application for Bean/Allard Farm 5.Other necessary business Minutes Members Present Staff Present Barbara Blumenthal, Chair Wayne Feiden, Planning Director David Drake Dylan Gaffney (alternate) Bruce Kriviskey Norman Winston Members Absent Craig Della Penna Kim Howes Tris Metcalfe 1.Public Comment: No public comment 2.Memorial Fountain Committee: Barbara Blumenthal reported that the Fountain Committee has put off their CPA application for funds until the August 2010 grant round. 3.Bean/Allard Farms update: Wayne Feiden reported that the City was moving forward, with the Trust for Public Land, to preserve both the Bean Farm (previously discussed) and the Allard Farm. 4.Memorial Bench at Northampton State Hospital Burial Ground: Barbara Blumenthal reported that she is working with Smith Vocational on the project and will have more information in the spring. 5.Historical files on internet: Wayne Feiden reported on the Laserfiche Document Management System which will allow most public records to be easily available to the public. Historical Commission Form Bs and past awards are among the first items to be moved onto this system. 6.Historic Mill River restoration: Wayne Feiden updated the Commission on the City’s ongoing efforts to eventually restore a portion of the historic Mill River through downtown Northampton. The Army Corps of Engineers reported that they would create a scope of services for what studies would be necessary if the project is ever to move forward. 7.Minutes of December 28, 2009: Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Dylan Gaffney, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes. 8.Adjourn at 6:20 PM: Upon motion by David Drake and second by Dylan Gaffney, the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn. Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, March 22, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM PLACE: City Hall Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton (use rear door) For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of January 25, 2010 3.Upper Roberts Meadow Dam 4.Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review 5.Village Hill, Notice of Project Change 6.State Hospital Memorialization project a.Update on project b.Ownership/responsibility for the future memorialization/fountain 7.Other necessary business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes Meeting of March 22, 2010 Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Norman Winston, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, Kim Howes and David Drake Staff Present: Wayne Feiden and Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm. Wayne introduced Sarah, who will be the new primary staff to the Commission. Public Comments There was no public comment. Approval of Minutes of January 25, 2010 Kim moved to accept the minutes as presented, seconded by David. The motion carried unanimously. Upper Roberts Meadow Dam Barbara Pelissier, Westhampton Historical Commission provided information about the historic Upper Roberts Meadow section of Northampton. The Roberts mill millstone is now located within the dam structure. Dee Boyle-Clapp, Friends of Upper Roberts Meadow, gave an overview of changes to dam safety regulations following the near-disaster in Taunton. The Friends are working on getting the Dam listed on the state register. The Committee discussed the condition of the dam, accessibility to the public, and the history of the surrounding area. Staff will seek a determination from the City Solicitor as to whether dams fall under the Demolition Delay ordinance. Committee members were also curious how demolition delay would come into play if DCR and the DPW ordered the dam removed for safety reasons. Bruce moved to commend the efforts of the Friends in supporting preservation of the historic dam. David clarified that this motion does not indicate Historical Commission support of the CPA application. The Commission will request that CPA applications in the historic preservation category be provided by the Community Preservation Committee. Kim seconded Bruce’s motion, and it carried unanimously. Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review Sarah provided a summary of the applications reviewed over the last five years. There were 44 total reviews, three were declared significant; two of these were ‘preferably preserved.’ Structures included: 2 carriage houses, 1 bank, 2 sheds, 20 fairgrounds buildings, 1 commercial building, 13 houses, 22 garages and 2 barns. The Committee agreed that staff should draft a report to City Council for consideration at the next meeting, and then look at the Ordinance for potential changes more carefully. Village Hill, Notice of Project Change The Commission agreed that the project will likely change several times before it is complete, and decided not to send a comment letter. It was noted that the changes will be ‘historically compatible,’ but it has not been noted who will be reviewing designs for historical content. Kim moved that the Commission continue to refer to the project as the ‘State Hospital,’ seconded by David. The motion carried unanimously. State Hospital Memorialization project Barbara stated that a consultant looked at the fountain, and it is in fairly good shape. CPA funds will be sought in a future round. Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 1 March 22, 2010 Other necessary business The Commission agreed to identify some historic resources for which staff could prepare ‘ready-to-go’ grant applications for grants with short turn arounds. The Commission will start thinking about preservation awards. Bruce noted that Bonnie Parsons is finishing Form B forms for Elm Street, and will then begin to tackle other areas of the City. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:50 Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, April 26, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton (use rear door) For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of March 22, 2010 3.Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review Memo to City Council 4.Demolition – 202 North Main Street, Florence 5.Northampton Book Reprinting 6.State Hospital Memorialization project update 7.Tour of Historic Inventory at www.northamptonma.gov 8.Ruggles Center Event Recap 9.Review of Mail 10.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes Meeting of April 26, 2010 Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Dylan Gaffney, Norman Winston, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, Kim Howes and David Drake Staff Present: Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 5:40 pm. Public Comments There were no public comments. Approval of Minutes of March 22, 2010 David moved to accept the minutes as presented, seconded by Norman. The motion carried unanimously. Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review Memo to City Council Sarah distributed a draft memo for the Commission’s review. The Commission discussed possible amendments to recommend. Sarah suggested the garages be exempted from the Ordinance. The Commission decided this shouldn’t be recommended, as there is often confusion between garages and carriage houses. The Commission pointed out that there was fear when the Ordinance was first passed that it would impede demolition of derelict structures. In fact, reviews were completed very quickly, and did not pose delays to homeowners. The Commission suggested that the report include ‘success stories’ if the Preferably Preserved properties. The Commission discussed the definition of ‘structure.’ David moved to recommend changing the definition to the definition listed on forms used by the Mass Historic Commission. The motion was seconded by Bruce. Bruce added that the recommendation to Council should specify that the change is intended to bring Northampton’s Ordinance into conformance with other state and local definitions. The motion carried unanimously. Sarah will update the review for consideration at the next meeting. The Commission agreed it should be available on the Web when complete. Demolition - 202 North Main Street, Florence Handout: 202 North Main Memo Sarah provided a summary memo of a demolition that occurred without Historical Commission notification. 202 North Main Street was damaged by fire, and was subsequently knocked down. The demolition occurred during the transition from one building inspector to the next. The Commission discussed possible ways to prevent similar situations in the future. Sarah and Barbara will meet with the building inspector to work on a procedure that works for everyone. Northampton Book Reprinting The Commission discussed the book’s bibliography, and suggested some resources to add. It will not include websites, due to their ephemeral nature. State Hospital Memorialization Project Update No discussion Ruggles Center Event Recap Tris provided an overview of the event, which had a good turnout. A presentation was made of the recently published David Ruggles biography. The museum generally won’t have original artifacts, but will aim to be a data resource. Review of Mail Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 1 April 26, 2010 The Commission reviewed a letter sent on behalf of the Hampshire Council of Governments in support of a grant application from Mass Historic. Other Business Sarah asked the Commission if they would be in support of a CPA application to fund a historic preservation restriction/easement program. This would be intended to allow for holding and monitoring of donated restrictions. Craig moved to allow staff to create a CPA application for a preservation program for the next funding round. The motion was seconded by David, and carried unanimously. The Commission agreed that the next meeting will be June 28. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:00 Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 2 April 26, 2010 Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, June 21, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Room 11, 210 Main Street, Northampton (use rear door) For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of April 26, 2010 3.Demolition Delay Determination of Significance, 101 King Street a.Christian Life Center b.Rectory c.Menard Center 4.Section 106 Review: Upper Roberts Meadow Dam 5.Section 106 Review: Paradise Pond Dam 6.Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review Report 7.Review of Mail 8.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes Meeting of June 21, 2010 Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Dylan Gaffney, Norman Winston, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, Kim Howes Staff Present: Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm. Public Comments There were no public comments. Approval of Minutes of April 26, 2010 Dylan moved to accept the minutes as presented, seconded by Norman. The motion carried unanimously. Demolition Delay Ordinance, Determination of Significance, 101 King Street Ed Skroski, Richard Dragon, and Reverend John Connors represented Sacred Heart, and provided a background on the consolidation of the parishes. Closed churches are now vacant, and their land will eventually be sold. The buildings are proposed to be demolished to make way for parking that will be needed to accommodate additional parishioners. A new church hall is also planned. Barbara asked for how long the buildings have been vacant. Reverend Connors replied that the rectory was used until January, the Christian Life Center has been vacant for some time, and the Menard Center was used on a weekly basis until recently. Norman noted that additional building is proposed, although parking is needed. Reverend Connors noted that the peak demand times of the church hall and church would not be the same. The Commission discussed the age of the buildings. Louis Hasbrouck, Northampton Building Inspector, stated that he had originally thought that the rectory was constructed at the same time as the church, but it actually predates the church. The Christian Life Center was the original church structure, and predates 1900. Tris asked if renovation had been considered as an alternative to constructing a new building. Reverend Connors replied that existing buildings don’t meet the church’s needs, but a new building could reflect the architectural style of the main church. A condition assessment indicated that the rectory couldn’t be maintained, due to prior fires and existing structural issues. Bruce noted that some of the rectory’s architectural history has been lost due to renovations. The Menard Center is a good example of a late 19 century residential structure, but these are common in th Northampton. The Christian Life Center has lost some detail, but is an example of an early church building. Ed discussed potential site layouts, noting that the new hall would seat 300, and be handicapped accessible. Barbara noted that the Ordinance process is now for the Commission to provide determinations of significance for each of the buildings by June 26. Tris noted that the goal of a delay would be to find an alternative to demolition, and asked how a delay would affect the church’s schedule. Reverend Connors replied that it could force demolition into a new construction season, and would also have a financial impact in requiring maintenance of the vacant structures. The parishioners are concerned about the new parish and the proposed option addresses those concerns as best as possible after a careful look at possibilities for the buildings. Bruce moved that the Christian Life Center be determined Significant according to the Demolition Ordinance, seconded by Tris. The motion carried, 6-1. Bruce moved that the Rectory be determined Significant according to the Demolition Ordinance, seconded by Tris. The motion carried, 5-2. Bruce moved that the Menard Center be determined Significant according to the Demolition Ordinance, seconded by Tris. The motion failed, 2-5. Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 1 June 21, 2010 A site visit will be planned prior to the public hearing. The Commission addressed questions from the audience regarding the process and timelines of the Demolition Delay process as prescribed in the Ordinance. Section 106 Review: Upper Roberts Meadow Dam Sarah read the Commission a letter from MHC to Ned Huntley, City Engineer, indicating that additional information would be required to determine if the dam is eligible for National Register listing. The Dam is proposed to be removed by the DPW, requiring an ACOE permit. The Commission discussed the dam’s relation to hydropower. Barbara Pelissier, Friends of Upper Roberts Meadow stated that the Friends have hired a hydropower consultant. Bruce noted that hydropower, while important, isn’t a concern of the Historical Commission. Bruce moved to go on record that the Upper Roberts Meadow Dam is of historic interest and importance to the City of Northampton, seconded by Tris. The motion carried, 6-1. Section 106 Review: Paradise Pond Dam Sarah noted that the dam and dike are proposed to be repaired in response to a poor safety rating. Bruce moved to recognize the historic significance of Paradise Pon, and support efforts of its preservation by repairing the dam. Seconded by Tris. The motion carried unanimously. Demolition Delay Ordinance, Five-Year Review Report The Commission reviewed a revised draft of the review memo. Tris moved to submit the report to City Council, seconded by Bruce. The motion carried unanimously. Sarah will make the report available online. Review of Mail Letter from Provincetown Museum inviting participation in the 100 anniversary of the Pilgrim th Monument. No action; the deadline had passed. Other Business The Commission agreed that the hearing should be scheduled for July 13 at 6:30. Sarah will set up a site visit. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:55 Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 2 June 21, 2010 Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 TIME: 6:30 PM PLACE: JFK Middle School Community Room, 100 Bridge Road, Florence For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of June 21, 2010 3.Public Hearing: To determine whether the Sacred Heart Rectory, 101 King Street, Map ID 31B-159, should be determined “Preferably Preserved” pursuant to the Northampton Demolition Ordinance, Chapter 161 of the General Code. 4.Review of Mail 5.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes Meeting of July 13, 2010 Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Dylan Gaffney, Kimball Howes, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, David Drake Staff Present: Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. Public Comments There were no public comments. Approval of Minutes of June 21, 2010 Mr. Gaffney moved to accept the minutes as presented, seconded by Mr. Kriviskey. The motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing: To determine whether the Sacred Heart Rectory, 101 King Street, Map ID 31B-159, should be determined “Preferably Preserved” pursuant to the Northampton Demolition Ordinance, Chapter 161 of the General Code. Chair Blumenthal opened the hearing, and reminded those in attendance that the Commission voted at their last meeting that the Rectory is a Significant structure under the Demolition Ordinance. Following a Significant determination, the Historical Commission must hold a public hearing within 30 days to determine Preferably Preserved status. Chair Blumenthal read from the Demolition Ordinance regarding the evidence that can be collected and considered in a Preferably Preserved determination, noting that the Commission decided at the June 21 meeting that the Menard Center is not significant, so demolition can proceed. The Christian Life Center was determined Significant, but will be reviewed by the Central Business Architecture Committee as it is in the Central Business District. Chair Blumenthal asked church representatives if they had any statements or presentations. Father Connors noted that St. Elizabeth Ann Seton became a citywide parish in January. In response to the church closings, a Committee was formed to identify artifacts that could be used in the new parish. It’s necessary that the proposed new parish hall be located next to the church to be able to effectively serve parishioners. Attorney Ed Etheredge, representing the church, explained that the concept is to replace the rectory and fellowship hall with a new hall, on the same plane as the church at the City’s suggestion. The church requests that the Historical Commission decide that while the rectory has merit, there is value in having a new building that incorporates elements of the church. If Preferably Preserved status must be determined, the church requests that a delay be imposed only for a short time. The Historical Commission can have input on the elements that can be included in a new building. Chair Blumenthal noted that the Historical Commission is an active participant in the demolition delay process of searching for an alternate solution. Attorney Etheredge provided a letter to the Commission reserving its rights under the religious land use act. Mr. Kriviskey noted that these laws still retain communities’ rights to the reasonable regulation of land use. Mr. Howes asked if there is unanimity on plans for the new parish site from parishioners and those in attendance. Tom Libby, Hawthorne Terrace, stated that he is a member of the interim parish council, and supports the information presented by Attorney Etheredge. Another interim council member noted the importance of being able to walk from the church to the parish hall. Ed Skroski, parishioner, stated that he has worked with Father Connors to come up with a solution to the problems posed by combining churches. Also, the Commission has been presented with a report that details the condition of the rectory and the costs required to repair. Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 1 July 13, 2010 Mr. Kriviskey stated that the Commission had a tour of the rectory and Christian Life Center, and have also had an opportunity to review historic information. The rectory has been negatively changed over time, and much of its original style has been lost. Mr. Metcalfe noted that the plans for the new hall could allow the rectory to remain in its current location. It could then be restored, with potential funding from several different programs. Chair Blumenthal noted that the house was built around 1825 by Isaac Damon, who also designed several other important Northampton buildings. This is one of two remaining residential structures designed by Damon; the other is in Historic Northampton. Mr. Drake asked about the proposed design for the new parish hall. It appears to present a blank brick face to King Street. The church should be encouraged to pursue a connection to Northampton by a different type of street-facing wall. The rectory is a house designed by a prominent Northampton architect that has been injured. However, other buildings have recovered from harm done to historic features. The rectory is the only remaining King Street mansion, and the purpose of the Ordinance is to encourage thoughtfulness in protecting resources. Mr. Metcalfe noted that the proposed façade of the new parish hall is not good, and appears to mimic the current state of the rectory. Father Connors noted that the rendering is not intended to capture the final design. Jim Jacobs asked whether trees are part of the demolition delay review, specifically the pine stand to the rear of the church. Mr. Drake replied that they are not, but would be addressed during the planning board’s site plan review. Mr. Drake asked if the parish has any plans for the possible moving of the structure. Father Connors replied that they do not. Mr. Metcalfe moved to determine the rectory Preferably Preserved under the terms of the Demolition Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Howes. The motion carried, 6-1. Chair Blumenthal noted that the demolition delay period is up to 12 months from the date of filing with the building commissioner, according to the Demolition Ordinance. Chair Blumenthal noted that the Central Business Architecture Committee will be meeting on July 14, and asked whether the Historical Commission should prepare some input regarding the Christian Life Center. The Commission agreed that Mr. Kriviskey will represent the Commission, and Chair Blumenthal will also prepare a statement. David asked about the pending litigation regarding a historic district surrounding a Springfield church. Ms. LaValley will provide research. Mr. Drake suggested that Commission communicate in its determination that it is not concerned about removal of the additions located on the rear of the rectory. Review of Mail There was no mail. Other Business The next meeting was tentatively scheduled for August 30. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:55 Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 2 July 13, 2010 Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, August 30, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of July 13, 2010 3.Leeds Civic Association - Hotel Bridge Community Preservation Project 4.Lilly Library – Stained Glass Window Community Preservation Project 5.CT River Boat Basin Restoration 6.Sacred Heart Rectory - brainstorming 7.Demolition Delay Ordinance – suggested amendments 8.Review of Mail 9.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes Meeting of August 30, 2010 Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Norm Winston, Kimball Howes, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, David Drake Staff Present: Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 5:35 pm. Public Comments There were no public comments. Approval of Minutes of July 13, 2010 Mr. Winston moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Mr. Drake. Chair Blumenthal requested that members be referred to formally. The motion carried unanimously. Leeds Civic Association - Hotel Bridge Community Preservation Project Sue Carbin and George Kohout, Leeds Civic Association, informed the Commission that the LCA will be applying for CPA funds in conjunction with the DPW. The historical aspects of the bridge are deteriorating, and a cost estimate for repair is being sought. CPA funds will then be sought for repair, as a previous application for a study was not funded. Ms. Carbin noted that the bridge is the oldest Pratt Truss Bridge in Massachusetts. Mr. Della Penna stated that a shell bridge in Northfield was named an endangered historic bridge. An economic development study is being done there to examine the benefit re-opening the bridge would have. That approach may be useful in Leeds as well. Mr. Della Penna asked if a number has been assigned for demolition. If it has, funding allocated to demolition could instead be put into repair. While this was formerly available only to vehicular bridges, it’s recently been shown to be possible for non-vehicular bridges. The Commission discussed National Register nomination status. A Planning intern had pulled together some initial research, which Sarah will provide to LCA to look into next steps. The Commission suggested that to fully support the project, additional information about repair plans, and materials proposed would be required. Mr. Kohout indicated that a request will not be submitted to the CPC for the current round, but funding will be sought during the January grant round. Lilly Library – Stained Glass Window Community Preservation Project Handout: Lilly Library Package Mary Ann Tourjee, Lilly Library Executive Director provided photos of the library prior to renovations, and then after, when the stained glass windows had been removed. A test window was restored to provide a cost estimate. Patrick Curran indicated that 13 windows in the reference area can be restored for $1,000 per window, and then hung indoors. The Commission suggested that the frames be returned to their original colors. The Commission agreed that the Library is an important structure. Mr. Kriviskey moved to support the window preservation in Lilly Library, seconded by David. The motion carried unanimously. CT River Boat Basin Restoration No discussion. Sacred Heart Rectory – brainstorming Ms. LaValley informed the Commission that the Planning Board hearing has been postponed. Mr. Kriviskey noted that an opinion will be sought as to whether the Central Business Architecture Committee can consider the entire site, since it is split by zoning. The Commission agreed that having a dialog with the diocese as to how the rectory could fit into future plans for the site. Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 1 August 30, 2010 Mr. Drake volunteered to contact the Hadley Historical Commission to see if they could contribute any context or additional information about the builder. Chair Blumenthal noted that it is important to follow-up on the site; the rectory was declared preferably preserved, so it is the Commission’s role to identify possible options. The Commission suggested that Ms. LaValley post a question on the Historic Preservation listserve to see if there are other examples of adaptive re-use of rectories. The Commission agreed that some of the members should meet with church representatives in a workshop setting. Ms. LaValley will contact the church to schedule. Demolition Delay Ordinance – suggested amendments The Commission agreed that the amendments should be presented to City Council. Review of Mail No mail. Other Business The next meeting was tentatively scheduled for August 30. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:10 Northampton Historical Commission Minutes 2 August 30, 2010 Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Thursday, September 23 2010 TIME: 7:15 PM LOCATION: City Council Chambers, 212 Main Street, Northampton For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda Joint public meeting with the Planning Board and Central Business Architecture Commission. St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish for Planning Board Site Plan Approval to construct a 14,000 square foot building and parking lot, 91 King Street, Map ID 31B-159, 31B-192. Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, September 27, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of August 30, 2010 3.New Haven Northampton Canal a.Boat basin b.Historic locks 4.Sacred Heart Rectory – brainstorming 5.Preservation Restriction Program 6.Bean/Allard National Register Nomination 7.2011 Survey and Planning Grant 8.Demo Delay a.Update on Ordinance Amendment b.Historical Commission suggestions for activities not subject to formal review c.26 Union Street 9.Meeting Schedule 10.Review of Mail 11.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes DATE: Monday, September 27, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Kimball Howes, Dylan Gaffney, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, David Drake Staff Present: Wayne Feiden Chair Blumenthal called the meeting to order at 5:35 pm 1.Public Comments There was no public comment 2.Approval of Minutes of August 30, 2010 Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Dylan Gaffney, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of August 30, 2010. 3.New Haven Northampton Canal a.Boat basin b.Historic locks Jonathan Wright discussed the history of the New Haven Northampton Canal’s historic boat basin at the Connecticut River and how this history can come alive with the proposed community boat house. Wayne Feiden provided additional information on the historic locks and the City’s hopes to add that history to the site. The Commission members supported the idea of keeping the memory of these resources alive as the site is redeveloped for a community boathouse and park. 4.Sacred Heart Rectory – brainstorming The Commission asked for an update on the Sacred Heart Rectory, which is currently under a one-year demolition freeze. Wayne Feiden pointed out that as a quasi-judicial board, neither the Commission nor its members should be having any discussions that would threaten their impartiality or indicate that they have made up their mind. Mr. Metcalf suggested that Commissioners could still be involved privately. Mr. Feiden suggested that would still be ex parte contact. 5.Review of 26 Union Street proposed demolition The commission discussed the building, build c. 1828-1829. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by David Drake, the Commission voted unanimously to make a positive determination that the building is significant. This requires a hearing within 30 days to determine if the building, although significant, can be demolished. The Commission set the public hearing for 5:30 PM on Monday October 25, 2010. 6.Review of Preservation Restriction Program Wayne Feiden presented the proposed Preservation Restriction Program. The Historical Commission was very supportive and approve the program by unanimous consent. 7.Other business The Commission agreed to hold a joint meeting with the Elm Street Historic District Commission to discuss a possible merger of the two boards. The Commission discussed and was very supportive of a possible Pomeroy Terrace National Register District Nomination. The Commission agreed to put off having an awards ceremony in 2010 and agreed that the next ceremony would be in 2011. The Commission agreed that a ceremony every two years might make the most sense, to ensure that there are good candidates for awards, but agreed that they could reexamine this schedule if there are enough potential nominations in 2012 or thereafter. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Craig Della Penna, the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn at 7:10 PM. Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Monday, October 25, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of September 27, 2010 3.2010-2015 Open Space, Recreation, and Multi-Use Trail Plan 4.Clarke School Campus Planning 5.6:15 – Public Hearing To determine whether the house located at 26 Union Street, Map ID 32A-55, should be determined “Preferably Preserved” pursuant to the Northampton Demolition Ordinance, Chapter 161 of the General Code 6.Demo Delay a.Update on Ordinance Amendment b.Historical Commission suggestions for activities not subject to formal review 7.Meeting Schedule 8.Review of Mail 9.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes DATE: Monday, October 25, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Tris Metcalfe, Kimball Howes, Bruce Kriviskey, Craig Della Penna, and David Drake Staff Present: Wayne Feiden Barbara Blumenthal opened the meeting at 5:35 PM. 1.Public Comments There were no public comments. 2.Approval of Minutes of September 27, 2010 Upon motion by David Drake and second by Bruce Kriviskey the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes with two corrections. 3.2010-2015 Open Space, Recreation, and Multi-Use Trail Plan Upon a motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by Kim Howes the Commission voted unanimously to endorse the Open Space, Recreation and Multi-Use Plan and especially those aspects of the plan relating to history, heritage landscapes, and historical interpretation. 4.Clarke School Campus Planning Nothing was discussed for this item (it will be on the November agenda). 5.November meeting The Commission agreed to hold their next meeting on Tuesday, November 16. th 6. Lilly Library David Drake brought the Commission up-to-date on the Lilly Library CPA request for historic window rehab and Lilly Library’s willingness to commit to preserve historic windows and window parts. 7.Demolition Delay The current proposed ordinance amendment has moved to Ordinance Committee, who will take it up on November 8. th 8.6:15 PM– Public Hearing-- To determine whether the house located at 26 Union Street, Map ID 32A-55, should be determined “Preferably Preserved” pursuant to the Northampton Demolition Ordinance, Chapter 161 of the General Code Barbara Blumenthal opened the public hearing at 6:15 PM. She explained that the process was that at the October meeting the Historical Commission found the building “historically significant,” and then she went through the criteria of that the Commission should consider in determining if the building should be “preferably preserved,” which would then create a demolition delay provision. Louis Hasbrouck, Northampton Building Commissioner, said that the building was clearly historic and its framing shows the history, but that the building was extremely significantly damaged by the fire. Subsequent water damage had created mold and rot problems. He indicated that in a different situation he might have ordered it torn down immediately, but put off that step because it didn’t seem that there was an imminent safety threat. He indicated that framing and door trip indicate a house substantially older than 1875. He stated a personal preference for someone to salvage some of the historic materials but said that he did not think that the building was salvageable, and if it was salvaged at enormous cost it would be a reproduction and not the original structure. David Drake asked to compare this house to the house at Franklin and Prospect which had a fire but was restored. Louis Hasbrouck said that the Franklin/Prospect house was much larger and the damage was contained in a smaller area. He said that if the house was salvaged only be 25% might be salvaged, but even that would need an entirely new flooring system. Hobie Islan, the contractor who hopes to purchase and demolish the building, said that he is a preservationist at heart, and has preserved five buildings, three of which won historic awards. He said that this building is not financial viable because the damage was so severe. He wants to demolish but would rebuild in the style in the area. He pointed out that he lives next store and so has a special interest in enhancing the neighborhood. He stated the building was originally historically significant but even before the fire it had already lost some of its historic integrity based on past projects. Bruce Kriviskey said that he is convinced the building should be allowed to be demolished because it is beyond saving and the new use will be a spark to help the neighborhood. Upon motion by Bruce Kriviskey and second by David Drake, the Historic Commission voted unanimously to closes the public hearing and to find that the building, while significant, should not be preferably preserved nor subject to demolition delay. There was a brief discussion about whether the Zoning Permit can have a check list for Demolition Delay. Louis Hasbrouck said it was on his list for the new IT person who was just hired. Louis suggested thinking about regulating partial demolition projects to require documentation before changes occur, perhaps in a process that doesn’t require full Commission review. There was a discussion about how to regulate such in a way that could be palatable to the community, including creating a pattern book of designs that work in neighborhoods or adding to demolition delay to cover facades visible from a public way. Upon motion by David Drake and second by Tris Metcalf the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn at 7:05 PM. Northampton Historical Commission Meeting Notice DATE: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street For questions contact: Sarah LaValley, slavalley@northamptonma.gov, or Barbara Blumenthal, bblument@smith.edu Agenda 1.Public Comments 2.Approval of Minutes of October 25, 2010 3.Laurel Park Community Preservation Project Presentation 4.Demo Delay a.Update on Ordinance Amendment b.Historical Commission suggestions for activities not subject to formal review 5.Meeting Schedule 6.Review of Mail 7.Other business Northampton Historical Commission Minutes DATE: Monday, November 16, 2010 TIME: 5:30 PM PLACE: City Hall Hearing Room, 210 Main Street Members Present: Barbara Blumenthal, Bruce Kriviskey (5:50), Craig Della Penna, and David Drake Staff Present: Sarah LaValley Chair Blumenthal opened the meeting at 5:35 PM. 1.Public Comments Joe Misterka talked to the Commission about the demolition of the Upper Roberts Meadow Dam. The BPW is clear that the dam will be removed, but perhaps some of the stonework could be left, and a plaque could be installed. CPA funds could possible be investigated for some of this work. Mr. Drake asked how the City would handle nuisance and liability issues that could arise with leaving any parts of the dam in place. Mr. Della Penna noted that there are three places in Northampton where dams have been removed and abutments remain. The new land that will be created from the dam’s removal must also be considered. Mr. Drake asked if there is support in the area for these ideas. Mr. Misterka replied that he has not yet spoken to neighbors. The Commission discussed possibilities for the dam area, noting that it will no longer be watershed land and trails could potentially be an option. 2.Approval of Minutes of October 25, 2010 Upon motion by Mr. Drake and second by Mr. Della Penna the Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes with minor corrections. 3.Laurel Park Community Preservation Project Presentation Greg Kline, Laurel Park Association provided a history of Laurel Park. It began as a religious camp, and was also involved in the Chautaqua Movement. Several historic buildings on the property now require fixing up. The Association would like to involve the larger community with Laurel Park. A condominium association owns the common buildings, but the nonprofit Laurel Park Association offers programs in them. Mr. Kriviskey asked about potential designation as a local or national register historic district. Mr. Kline stated that there is concern about limitations on private residences, and asked whether national register designation would prevent homeowners from changing their structures. Mr. Kriviskey replied that it would not, but a local district would. Mr. Drake stated that if CPA funds will be sought, it should be demonstrated that the project will have a benefit to the community at-large. Ms. LaValley suggested that whichever group is seeking CPA funds should also have site control. 4.Demo Delay a.Update on Ordinance Amendment Ms. LaValley informed the Commission that the EDHLU Committee unanimously recommended the expanded definition of structure in the Demolition Ordinance, and it will now go before the Ordinance Committee. b.Historical Commission suggestions for activities not subject to formal review No Discussion. 5.Meeting Schedule No discussion. 6.Review of Mail No mail. 7.Other Business Members of the Elm Street Historic District Commission (HDC) were present at the meeting, and the Commissions introduced themselves. Elm Street Chair Marisa Labozzetta stated that Design Standards for the district have recently been completed. The Commissions discussed their roles with regard to preservation planning, and the items each Commission focuses on, in light of a potential merger. Martha Lyon asked how the Commission approaches long-term planning. The Commission replied that a comprehensive Form B update has been begun, which can serve as the basis for a larger study. Mr. Drake noted that the Historical Commission has played a more general role with regard to preservation, fielding questions about what is and is not historically appropriate for Northampton. The Commission is also involved more with broad policy, while by nature the HDC is more focused on specific things. More recently, the Commission has also become a permit-granting board for Demolition Review. Wayne Feiden, Director, Office of Planning and Development noted that the HDC consumes a great deal of staff effort for a small area, and reducing overhead would leave more time for substance. The HDC is working on delegating more minor reviews to staff, since the Design Guidelines have been completed. It was agreed that the HDC should come to the next Commission meeting, and the agendas will be distributed to both Commissions. 2 The Commission talked about the Form B project, and Ms. LaValley noted approximately 400 are complete. The Commission suggested that Bonnie Parsons, who is working on the project at PVPC, provide an update and discuss strategy and approach. Ms. LaValley informed the Commission that an intent letter has been submitted for a MassHistoric Commission Survey and Planning Grant, and that the CPA funding decisions will be made November 18. 8.Adjourn Upon motion by Mr. Drake and second by Mr. Della Penna the Commission voted unanimously to adjourn at 7:45 PM. 3