Bean Farm Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment NOW Grow Food Northampton and Mill River Greenway
J0285-14-01 February 8, 2010 Prepared For: Office of Planning and Development City of Northampton 210 Main Street, Room 11 Northampton, Massachusetts 01060 Attention: Mr. Wayne Feiden
Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment Former Bean Farm, Spring Street Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared By: O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. 293 Bridge Street, Suite 500
Springfield, MA 01103
293 Bridge Street, Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 Tel 413 788 6222 Fax 413 788 8830 www.oto-env.com EnvironmentalSafetyHealthGeotechnical O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E
S ] E N G I N E E R I N G J285-14-01 February 8, 2010 Mr. Wayne Feiden Office of Planning and Development City of Northampton 210 Main Street, Room 11 Northampton, Massachusetts 01060
Re: Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment Former Bean Farm, Spring Street Northampton, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Feiden: Attached is our Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
for the former Bean Farm property located off of Spring Street, Northampton, Massachusetts. Our ESA has been performed in accordance with ASTM Standard Practices E1527-05 and E1903-02.
Should you have any questions regarding the report, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. Valerie D. Tillinghast, LSP Kevin J. O’Reilly,
LSP Senior Project Manager Principal
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 2 E N G I N E E R I N G TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
........... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 2.1 PURPOSE..............................................
................................................................................................. 2 2.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................................................................
........................................... 3 2.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................................................... 3 2.4
LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS.............................................................................................. 3 2.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS............................................
............................................. 4 2.6 USER RELIANCE................................................................................................................................4
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION.........................................................................................................5 3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION......................................
............................................ 5 3.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS.......................................................... 5 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SITE...................
...................................................................................... 5 3.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS AND IMPROVEMENTS.............................. 5 3.5 CURRENT
USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES..................................................................... 6 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION .....................................................................
..........6 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW...........................................................................................................6 5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SOURCES
....................................................... 6 5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SOURCES................................................... 6 5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES...............
...................................................................................... 7 5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SITE AND ADJOINING PROPERTY... 8 5.4.1 Historic Maps and
Photographs................................ ................................ ........................ 8 5.4.2 Local Street Directories ................................ ...............................
. ................................ ....8 5.4.3 Assessor’s Office Records................................ ................................ ................................ .9 5.4.4 Storage
Tanks ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 9 5.4.5 Summary of History ................................
................................ ................................ .......10 5.5 PRIOR ASSESSMENTS .....................................................................................................
................10 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................................................................................. 10 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ...................
...........................................10 6.2 SITE SETTING AND OBSERVATIONS.....................................................................................10 6.2.1 Hazardous
Substances and Petroleum Products................................ .............................. 10 6.2.2 Storage Tanks ................................ ................................
................................ ................. 10 6.2.3 Odors ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................
11 6.2.4 Pools of Liquid ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 11 6.2.5 Drums ................................
................................ ................................ ............................ 11 6.2.6 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products Containers................................
............11 6.2.7 Unidentified Substance Containers ................................ ................................ ................. 11 6.2.8 PCBs ................................
................................ ................................ .............................. 12 6.2.9 Interior Observations ................................ ................................
................................ .....12 6.2.10 Exterior Observations -Pits, Ponds or Lagoons ................................ ........................... 12
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 3 E N G I N E E R I N G 6.2.11 Exterior Observations -Stained Soil or Pavement ................................ ........................
12 6.2.12 Exterior Observations -Stressed Vegetation................................ ................................ .12 6.2.13 Exterior Observations -Solid Waste ................................
................................ ............. 12 6.2.14 Exterior Observations -Waste Water ................................ ................................ ........... 13 6.2.15 Exterior
Observations – Wells ................................ ................................ ...................... 13 6.2.16 Exterior Observations -Septic Systems ................................
................................ ........ 13 7.0 INTERVIEWS................................................................................................................... 13 7.1
INTERVIEWS WITH OWNERS/OCCUPANTS/SITE MANAGER ....................................13 7.1.1 Site Owner................................ ................................ ................................
...................... 13 7.1.2 Potential Purchaser/Site Manager................................ ................................ ................... 14 7.2 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES................................................15 8.0 PHASE I FINDINGS........................................................................................................
15 8.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................16 9.0 Phase II Assessment .....................................................................
..................................... 17 9.1 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK..........................................................................................................17 9.2 SOIL
BORINGS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION.........................................17 9.2.1 Former Underground Storage Tank Area ................................ ................................
.......18 9.2.2 Former Solid Waste Fill Area................................ ................................ .......................... 18 9.2.3 Surface Soils in Former Orchard......................
.......... ................................ ..................... 18 9.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING......................................................................................................19
10.0 OPINION AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................................. 19 10.1 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK ........................................................
...............................19 10.2 PESTICIDES IN ORCHARD.........................................................................................................20 10.3 SOLID WASTE
FILL AREA ..........................................................................................................20 10.4 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS .......................................................
..................................................21 11.0 DEVIATIONS..................................................................................................................
21 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ............................................................................................. 21 13.0 REFERENCES...........................................................
..................................................... 21 14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT.............................................. 21 15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROFESSIONALS ............................ 22 16.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................... 23 TABLES Table
1 Standard Environmental Records Sources Table 2 Soil Analytical Results Table 3 Groundwater Analytical Results FIGURES Figure 1 Site Locus Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 DEP Priority Resource
Map
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 4 E N G I N E E R I N G APPENDICES Appendix A User Questionnaire Appendix B FirstSearch Regulatory Database Report Appendix C Historical
Research Documentation Appendix D Fire Department Documentation Appendix E Site Photographs Appendix F Boring/Monitoring Well Installation Logs Appendix G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix H Qualifications of Environmental Professional(s)
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 1 E N G I N E E R I N G 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. (OTO) has conducted a Phase I/II Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) for property located at 209 Spring Street in the Florence section of Northampton, Massachusetts. The ESA has been prepared in conformance with the ASTM Standards
E1527-05 and E1903-02 on behalf of the City of Northampton. The assessment consisted of: a records review; a Site and area reconnaissance; interviews with Site representatives; a review
of regulatory agency file information; interviews with local government officials; installation of two groundwater monitoring wells; collection and analysis of soil and groundwater samples;
and preparation of this report. A summary of our findings and conclusions is presented below. The Site includes approximately 47 acres of land that has historically been used for agricultural
purposes. A barn/shop, a hog house, and two sheds are located on Site. The residence and and abutting barn on this property were not included in our site assessment, as they are not
planned to be part of the potential property transfer. Our Phase I assessment identified three Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) at the Site: an underground storage tank (UST),
historic pesticide use in the orchards, and historic solid waste filling in one area. Phase II activities were conducted to assess these RECs. The first REC is a 100 gallon UST located
near the northeastern corner of the barn/shop near Spring Street. Use of the tank was reportedly discontinued when it was determined to be leaking, approximately 50 years ago. The tank
is believed to remain below grade, unfilled. Field screening of soil samples and laboratory analysis of a groundwater sample from the UST area did not indicate the presence of gasoline.
The UST is therefore identified as an historical REC. However, to come into compliance with Massachusetts tank regulations, and for safety considerations, we recommend the UST be removed.
removed. The second REC is pesticide use in historic apple orchards on Site. Soil testing was conducted in the main orchard area on the north side of the property. Arsenic and dieldrin
were detected above Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Reportable Concentrations in soil samples collected from the former orchard area. In our opinion, these constituents are exempt
from reporting under the MCP as they are believed to be present due to historic use of pesticides on Site in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. However, should you acquire
this property, we recommend you notify the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) and indicate your intention not to formally report this condition. If redevelopment
of this area occurs, we recommend you consult with a Licensed Site Professional (LSP) regarding proper soil management if the soils are relocated, and regarding potential public health
risks that may be associated with use of the area. We recommend you assume similar conditions conditions are present in the two smaller former orchards at the southern end of the property.
The third REC is an abandoned private solid waste fill area is located at the north end of the property. The area was formerly a gulley, and was filled with household and farm debris
such as
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 2 E N G I N E E R I N G cans, bottles and other trash. No disposal of hazardous materials in the area was identified. Use of the fill
area reportedly stopped approximately 30 years ago, when the area was covered with soil. We were unable to install a groundwater monitoring well in this area due to subsurface conditions.
A soil sample from the water saturated zone downgradient of the area did not contain lead, arsenic or other pesticides at levels above Reportable Concentrations. However, the fill materials
are unknown. We recommend you use caution in your future use of this area. If development of the fill area is planned, explorations should be conducted to further characterize the materials
present. Multiple drums, buckets and other containers in which oil or hazardous materials may be present were observed in the barn closest to Spring Street. We did not have access to
the barn interior for a complete reconnaissance, therefore the types and volumes of materials present are unknown. We recommend you use care to properly dispose of these materials. For
your convenience, a list of acronyms is provided in Section 16.0, at the end of this report. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 PURPOSE This report presents the results of a Phase I & II Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) performed at the former Bean Farm property located at 209 Spring Street in Northampton, Massachusetts. This Phase I & II ESA was performed in accordance with ASTM
Standards E1527-05 and E1903-02. This work was performed at the request of the City of Northampton, which may acquire the property. Mr. Wayne Feiden of the City of Northampton Planning
Department served as the Key Site Manager. Mr. Cordis Bean, the son of the deceased owner, served as the owner’s representative. The purpose of our Phase I & II ESA was to evaluate the
Site history and current conditions to identify past or current Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) at the Site. The ASTM Standard Practice defines "Recognized Environmental Conditions"
as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the subject site under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release or a material
threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater or surface water of the property. The term includes
hazardous substances even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement
action if brought to the attention of appropriate government agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. In addition, the ASTMStandard
requires that historical RECs (HRECs) and known or suspected environmental conditions be identified in the Phase I assessment report. The Standard defines HRECs as environmental conditions
“which in the past would have been considered a recognized environmental condition, but but which may or may not be considered a recognized environmental condition currently.”
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 3 E N G I N E E R I N G 2.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES The following tasks were undertaken: A review of Standard Environmental Records Sources;
Interviews with the Key Site Manager and owner’s representative; Interviews with local government officials; A review of Site history; A Site reconnaissance; Collection and analysis
of soil and groundwater samples; and, Evaluation and report preparation. 2.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS OTO has performed the environmental record searches in accordance with current ASTM
and industry practice. The data, findings, and conclusions presented in this ESA are based upon a search, review, and analysis of the documents and interviews, as well as observations
made during the Site reconnaissance. Conclusions reached regarding the conditions of the Site do not represent a warranty that all areas within the Site are of a similar quality, as
may be inferred from observable Site conditions and available Site history. As stated in the ASTM standard, no ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding potential environmental
conditions in connection with the Site. OTO’s evaluation and analysis are intended to reduce, not eliminate, the potential for conditions that result in environmental risk for the end
user of this report. 2.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS Our report has been performed subject to the following limitations: 1. The observations presented in this report were made under the
conditions described herein. The conclusions presented are based solely upon the services described and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of the project. 2. In preparing
the report, OTO relied on certain information provided by federal, state and local officials and other parties referenced herein, and on information contained in the files of state or
local regulatory agencies at the time of the file review. Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these sources, OTO did not attempt to independently
verify the the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this assessment. 3. Observations were made of the Site and of the structures on the
Site, as indicated within the report. Where access to portions of the Site or to structures on the Site was unavailable or limited, we render no opinion as to the presence of hazardous
materials or oil, or to the presence of indirect information relating to hazardous materials or oil in that
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 4 E N G I N E E R I N G portion of the Site. Access to the Site buildings was prevented by safety concerns. In addition, we render no
opinion as to the presence of hazardous materials or oil, where direct observations of portions of the Site were obstructed by objects or coverings on or over these surfaces. 4. The
purpose of this Report was to assess the physical characteristics of the Site with respect to the presence of hazardous material or oil in soil or groundwater at the Site. No specific
attempt was made to check on the compliance of present or past owners or operators of the Site with federal, state, or local laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise. The following
is a non-comprehensive list of issues and conditions which the report user may want to assess in connection with the real estate being evaluated and which are outside the scope of the
ASTM Phase I Site Assessment process: 1. Compliance with other site assessment report standards (bank bank or government agency standards); 2. Review of compliance with environmental
Activity and Use Limitations (AULs); 3. Asbestos Containing Building Materials; 4. Lead based paint; 5. Lead or other contaminants in drinking water; 6. Wetlands; 7. Regulatory compliance;
8. Cultural and historic resources; 9. Industrial hygiene; 10. Health and safety; 11. Ecological resources and Endangered species; 12. Indoor air quality; 13. Biological agents; and
14. Mold. While not included in this proposal, OTO can help you evaluate many of these potential concerns. Please feel free to contact us regarding these additional issues. This report
has been prepared in accordance with the referenced ASTM standards. 2.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS There are no other special terms or conditions concerning this project other than
those specifically described in Section 2.4. 2.6 USER RELIANCE This report documents the Site work performed by OTO at the request of the City of Northampton in accordance with ASTM
Standard 1527-05. The findings, opinions, and
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 5 E N G I N E E R I N G conclusions of this report are for the confidential and exclusive use of the City of Northampton. Reliance on
this report for any use or by parties other than those specifically stated is prohibited without the express written consent of OTO and the City of Northampton, and such use is at the
sole risk of the user. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Site Locus based on the current United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map of the Easthampton,
Massachusetts Quadrangle (1:25,000 scale) is attached as Figure 1. A Site Plan is provided as Figure 2. The property is listed in Northampton Assessor’s records as parcels 16C-025-001
and 16C-025-700. Portions of the parcel along Spring Street including the residence and an abutting barn would be retained by the Bean family, and were not included in this ESA. The
total area of the property included in this ESA is approximately 47 acres of land. 3.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The Site is located at 209 Spring Street in the Village
of Florence in Northampton, Massachusetts. The Site and vicinity are sparsely developed, and used primarily for residential and agricultural purposes. The Site is bounded by the Mill
River on the north, agricultural fields on the east, residential properties on the west, and Spring Street on the south. The Site elevation is approximately 250 feet above mean sea level
(MSL) in the central portions of the fields, which are relatively flat. Ground surface elevation slopes upwards in the western and southern portions of the Site, to approximately 280
feet near Spring Street. The Site is bordered to the north by the southeasterly flowing Mill River. Based on topography, groundwater flow direction at the Site is inferred to be northeasterly
towards the Mill River. A groundwater survey was not conducted to confirm this. 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SITE The Site is currently vacant, and is not used for any identified purpose.
It was most recently used for agricultural purposes, several years ago. 3.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS AND IMPROVEMENTS The Site is improved with several wood framed farm buildings,
including a barn/shop at the southern end of the Site near Spring Street, a building formerly used to house hogs and chickens (referred to in this report as “the hog house”) in the central
portion of the Site, and two open-air structures identified as the corn crib and hog shed on Figure 2. A private dirt road traverses the property in a roughly north-south orientation.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 6 E N G I N E E R I N G 3.5 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES During the Site visit, a visual survey was conducted of surrounding land
use. The Site is abutted to the north and east by a mixture of agricultural and forest land. Land to the south and west of the Site is primarily residential. 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
A User Questionnaire (as referenced in the ASTM Standard) has been completed and provided to OTO. The questionnaire was completed by Mr. Wayne Feiden of the Northampton Planning Department,
and is attached in Appendix A. This Phase I & II ESA was conducted on behalf of the City, which may acquire the property for use as recreational fields and/or agricultural land. Mr.
Feiden had no knowledge of environmental liens or Activity and Use Limitations at the property, and indicated the property price reflects fair market value. The City is aware of an underground
gasoline storage tank near the barn/shop, an old solid waste fill area at the north north end of the property, and the likely use of pesticides at the Site during its agricultural use.
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SOURCES The Standard Environmental Records Sources identified in the ASTM Standard were reviewed for the Site and vicinity using
a FirstSearch Technology Corporation (FirstSearch) database search conducted on December 1, 2009. A listing of the records reviewed by FirstSearch and the radius for which the search
was conducted is summarized in Table 1. The radius searched for these databases meets or exceeds the radius required in the ASTM standard. A copy of the FirstSearch report is attached
in Appendix B. No database listings were identified for the Site property. No Federal NPL (National Priorities List or Superfund), CERCLIS, RCRA Corrective Action Sites/TSDF or RCRA
generator listings were identified within the search radii. A total of four State-listed spills/releases were identified at two locations within one mile of the subject Site. Details
of the the releases were reviewed, and the nearest release was approximately 0.75 miles from the Site. Based on the information available in the FirstSearch report, online files from
MassDEP, and on the distance and the inferred groundwater flow direction with respect to the Site, none of the area listings are likely to impact Site soil and/or groundwater quality
above MassDEP standards. 5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SOURCES A review of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) on-line list of Sites with Activity
and Use Limitations (AULs) did not identify an AUL at the Site.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 7 E N G I N E E R I N G The Massachusetts Geographic Information System (MassGIS) on-line priority resource map of the Site and vicinity
was reviewed on November 30, 2009. A copy of that plan is provided as Figure 3. The northern portions of the Site along the Mill River are mapped as wetlands and an estimated habitat
of rare wildlife in wetlands areas. Construction and other activities in northern portions of the property may therefore be restricted and subject to permitting by the local Conservation
Commission. The MCP identifies different reporting classifications for potential releases to soil and groundwater. Groundwater located within current or potential drinking water source
areas is classified as RCGW-1. Current drinking water source areas are defined as areas: Within a Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area for a public water supply; Within the Zone
A of a Class A surface water body used as a public water supply; or Within 500 feet of a private water supply well. Potential drinking water source areas are defined as areas: 500 feet
or more from a public water supply line; Within an area designated by a municipality specifically for the protection of groundwater quality; or Within a Potentially Productive Aquifer
(PPA) that has not been excluded as a Non-Potential Drinking Water Source Area (NPDWSA). Based on our review of the MassGIS priority resource mapping, the Site is located within a medium
yield Potentially Productive Aquifer (PPA), and is therefore within a potential drinking water source area. The Site is
not located in a Current drinking water source area. Buildings in the Site vicinity are serviced by municipal sewer and water. Officials at the Northampton Health Department were not
aware of private wells within 500 feet of the Site. Based on the above information, the applicable Site groundwater classification would be RCGW-1. Soil located within 500 feet of residential
property or within a current or potential drinking water source area is classified as RCS-1 for MCP reporting purposes. Site soils would therefore be classified as RCS-1. No other Additional
Environmental Records Sources were reviewed. 5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES The United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map of the Easthampton, Massachusetts Quadrangle (1:25,000
scale) was reviewed and used to prepare the Site Locus (Figure 1). As shown on that plan, the Site slopes gently downward towards the abutting Mill River on the north. The elevation
at the Southern portion of the Site, in the area around the farm houses, ranges from approximately 260 to 270 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The remaining
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 8 E N G I N E E R I N G area north of the farm houses has a slightly lower elevation, and tends to be generally flat at an approximate
elevation of 250 feet above MSL. 5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SITE AND ADJOINING PROPERTY Our ASTM Standard Historical Sources review included historic maps, aerial photographs,
local street directories, fire department records, and interviews with knowledgeable individuals. A summary of relevant information obtained from these sources is presented below. Our
interview with Mr. Bean is discussed in Section 7.1.1. 5.4.1 Historic Maps and Photographs We reviewed historic Sanborn Fire Insurance Map files, and found there was no coverage for
the Site and immediate vicinity. The closest area for which coverage was available was the southern portion of Spring Street located south of Meadow Street. The absence of Sanborn map
coverage is common for areas that have not been heavily developed. Sanborn maps were developed primarily to document commercial and industrial use for fire insurance purposes. We reviewed
the 1895 Historic Topographic map from the UNH Diamond Library database of Historic USGS Maps of New England online at nh.edu/nhtopos/Northampton.htm on December 29, 2009. The USGS topographic
map for the area showed one building, consistent with a residence located just west of the Site along Spring Street. There were no buildings shown on the Site. At that time the vicinity
was sparsely developed. Aerial photographs from 1965 and 2005 were provided to by the City of Northampton. Additionally, an aerial photograph from the 1990s was reviewed on the MassGIS
website. The photographs show the Site farm houses and surrounding land consistent with current conditions. Consistent with information on historic use obtained during our interviews,
the 1965 aerial photograph shows an orchard in the northern portion of the Site. By the 1990s the orchard area had been converted to an open field, contiguous with other open fields
at the Site. Copies of relevant sections of historic maps and photographs are provided in Appendix C. 5.4.2 Local Street Directories We reviewed local street directories in approximately
ten year increments for the period from 1889 to 1970, the last date for which a directory was available at the Forbes Library in Northampton on December 29, 2009. The address historically
associated with the Site is not clear, and may have changed over time, therefore we reviewed listings for Spring Street between Meadow Street and Chesterfield Road. In 1909, Henry I.
Bean was listed as a farmer at 173 Spring Street. The property continued to be listed under Henry I. Bean until approximately 1949. In 1929, Fredrick H. Bean was listed at 190 Spring
Street. In 1939 A.H. Bean was listed at 195 Spring Street. In 1949 Robert Bean was added
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 9 E N G I N E E R I N G to the listings at 233 Spring Street. Sometime from 1940 to 1959 the Bean property at 173 Spring Street was sold
to William Gorham. The 1969 listed Cordis L. Bean at 198 Spring Street. In 1979 the Surname Bean was listed at 190, 195, 198, and 233 Spring Street. Based on street directory listings,
neighboring property use appears to have been primarily residential. The property at 150 Spring Street was identified as a commercial property (Florence Ice Co.) from approximately 1929
to 1939. In 1939 Florence Ice Co. was also listed as O’Donnell BJ fuel oil. By 1949 the address at 150 Spring Street was not listed. That property is approximately 800 feet southeast
of the Site, near the intersection with Meadow Street. A rifle range was listed at 228 Spring Street since between at least 1929 and 1969, at a location currently identified as Colonel
Lavalley Lane. 5.4.3 Assessor’s Office Records We reviewed property record information for the Site available at the Northampton Assessor’s Office on January 8, 2010. The subject property
was identified as map-block number 16C-025 at 209 Spring Street in Assessor’s records. The lot is listed as owned by Mr. Robert Bean. We understand the owner to be deceased, and the
estate not yet settled. The Assessor’s card indicates there is one house located at 209 Spring Street and it was constructed in 1900 and it is heated with an oil fired forced hot air
heating system. That residence was not included within the subject Site. 5.4.4 Storage Tanks As discussed in Section 7.1.1, Mr. Cordis Bean indicated a 100 gallon UST on the east side
of the barn/shop was formerly used to store gasoline. That tank is believed to remain below ground, empty and not formally abandoned. There were no leaking underground storage tank sites
identified within the search radii of the FirstSearch report. We requested storage tank records for the Site and vicinity at the Northampton Fire Department on December 29, 2009. The
Fire Department representative provided two records for Spring Street, neither of which is believed to be on the subject Site. Copies of Spring Street tank records are attached in Appendix
D. The first tank was located at 45 Spring Street. It was a 550 gallon steel underground storage tank (UST) used to store fuel oil, and was removed in February 2000. The second tank
record for Spring Street was an application for a tank removal located at 465 Spring Street. The tank was a 550 gallon UST used to store fuel oil. The application was filed in May 1997.
The records did not include observations of subsurface conditions at the time of tank removal.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 10 E N G I N E E R I N G 5.4.5 Summary of History In summary, the Site and vicinity have been used for residential and agricultural purposes
since at least 1900. An orchard was formerly located at the northern end of the Site. One gasoline UST was located on the east side of the barn/shop, and is believed to remain in-place,
not formally abandoned. 5.5 PRIOR ASSESSMENTS No prior environmental assessment reports were identified for this property. 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Our initial Site Reconnaissance was conducted on November 30, 2009 in the company of Mr. Wayne Feiden of the Northampton Planning Department. That visit included observation of exterior
portions of the property only. Subsequently, on December 23, 2009, we performed a more detailed reconnaissance of the property in the company of Mr. Cordis Bean, who provided access
to the interior of the former hog house. The barn/shop near Spring Street was locked and could not be accessed during our investigations. However, we were able to observe portions of
the interior through windows. The ground surface was snow-covered during our December visit, but was visible during our November visit. Access to portions of the property and observation
of the ground surface were limited by dense vegetation. 6.2 SITE SETTING AND OBSERVATIONS The Site is located in a lightly developed area used primarily for residential and agricultural
purposes. Photographs of relevant features are provided in Appendix E. Our observations are presented in the following sections, which follow the ASTM standard outline. 6.2.1 Hazardous
Substances and Petroleum Products No current use of oil or hazardous materials was identified at the Site. The property was last used for agricultural purposes several years ago. However,
the barn/shop at the southern end of the Site, near Spring Street, contains multiple drums, buckets and other containers. We were not able to access the interior of the barn, but based
on our observations through windows, oil and/or hazardous materials including automotive fluids and general maintenance supplies such as paints and cleaners are likely to remain inside.
6.2.2 Storage Tanks During our Site reconnaissance, one storage tank was observed in a shed at the Site (see photograph in Appendix E). Based on the sound of the tank when the side was
struck, it
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 11 E N G I N E E R I N G appeared to be empty or nearly empty. Mr. Bean indicated this tank had previously been used for diesel fuel storage.
No indication of a release was observed on the ground surface in the tank vicinity. Mr. Bean indicated a location on the eastern side of the barn where a gasoline UST was located. We
did not observe fill or vent pipes in the vicinity of the reported UST, or at other locations on Site. As discussed in Section 7.1.1, Mr. Bean indicated use of the UST was terminated
approximately 50 years ago when it was determined that the tank leaked. The tank had not been formally abandoned, to his knowledge. 6.2.3 Odors No odors indicative of a release of oil
or hazardous materials were observed during our Site reconnaissance. 6.2.4 Pools of Liquid No pools of standing water or other liquids were observed at the Site or immediately abutting
property during our Site reconnaissance. 6.2.5 Drums Several abandoned steel drums were observed in exterior portions of the Site during our reconnaissance. The drums were empty and
rusting, with no indicators of their former contents. No indication of a release was identified in the vicinity of the drums, which are therefore not identified as a REC. 6.2.6 Hazardous
Substances and Petroleum Products Containers As described in Section 6.2.1, multiple containers were observed inside the barn/shop that may contain, or may have contained, oil and/or
hazardous materials. The types and quantities of these materials could not be documented, as we were not provided access to the barn interior. One steel storage tank was observed in
the corn crib, just beyond the barn on the dirt access road. The tank appeared to be empty. Mr. Bean indicated the tank had formerly been used as an above-ground storage unit for diesel
fuel. No other oil or hazardous material containers were observed at the Site. 6.2.7 Unidentified Substance Containers As described in Section 6.2.1, multiple unidentified containers
were observed in the barn/shop. In addition, multiple unidentified, empty, rusted, 55 gallon steel drums were located on the ground surface in wooded areas at the southern end of the
Site.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 12 E N G I N E E R I N G 6.2.8 PCBs No transformers or other equipment identified as potentially containing polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) was identified at the Site. 6.2.9 Interior Observations The interior of the barn/shop contains many drums, buckets, and other containers, as well as farm equipment and other debris.
Mr. Bean indicated this barn was formerly used as a shop. He indicated that pesticides were not stored in this building, they had been stored in the barn directly behind the residence,
which is not part of the Site. Our interior observations of the barn were limited to what was visible through windows from outside the buildings, as the building was locked on the date
of our reconnaissance. We observed the interior of the hog house in the company of Mr. Bean. The building contained wooden animal pens bedded with hay. A propane-fired heating system
and a water pump were observed in the northwestern corner of the ground floor. The upper floor of the building contained a small amount of trash, such as an old computer and a tire.
We did not identify conditions indicative of an oil or hazardous materials release in the hog house interior. As previously discussed, the corn crib contains one steel storage tank previously
used to store diesel fuel. 6.2.10 Exterior Observations -Pits, Ponds or Lagoons No pools of standing water or other liquids were observed at the Site or immediately abutting property
during our Site reconnaissance. A small pond is located in the west central portion of the Site. Mr. Bean indicated the pond is a natural feature, and that it goes nearly dry seasonally.
6.2.11 Exterior Observations -Stained Soil or Pavement No staining or other observations indicative of a release were observed in exterior portions of the Site. Portions of the property
are overgrown, such as the fill area, therefore the ground surface was not visible in some locations. 6.2.12 Exterior Observations -Stressed Vegetation No stressed vegetation was observed
at the Site or immediately abutting property during our reconnaissance.6.2.13 Exterior Observations -Solid Waste An abandoned private solid waste disposal area is located in the northern
portion of the property, west of the dirt road in the former orchard area. Mr. Bean indicated the area was used for
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 13 E N G I N E E R I N G general trash, such as cans and bottles, and that hazardous materials were not deposited here. The area is currently
overgrown with small brush. Small quantities of debris are visible at the ground surface. However, the area was largely covered over with soil at the time a sewer line was installed
in the vicinity, approximately 30 years ago, according to Mr. Bean. Because of the soil cover, it is difficult to determine the limits of filling, but we estimate an approximately 20
foot wide by 80 foot length of gulley may contain fill. Abandoned farming equipment and small piles of old construction materials and other debris were observed in limited areas at the
southern end of the Site, near the Spring Street barn. No indication of a reportable release associated with these materials was observed. 6.2.14 Exterior Observations -Waste Water No
waste water discharge was observed at the Site or immediately abutting property during our Site reconnaissance. 6.2.15 Exterior Observations – Wells Mr. Bean identified the location
of a shallow water well on Site, off the northwestern corner of the hog house. The well was formerly used to provide water for livestock, and is not plumbed to residential supplies.
No supply wells or groundwater monitoring wells were observed during our Site visit. As noted in Section 5.2, this area is serviced by the municipal water system. 6.2.16 Exterior Observations
-Septic Systems According to Mr. Cordis Bean, one out-of-service septic tank is located at the southern end of the Site, near the barn/shop. While the septic tank is on Site, the residence
associated with it is not. The septic system was formerly used by the residence, which is currently connected to the municipal sewer system. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 INTERVIEWS WITH OWNERS/OCCUPANTS/SITE
MANAGER OTO interviewed representatives of the current Site owner and the potential purchaser. Information from those interviews is summarized in the following sections. 7.1.1 Site Owner
OTO interviewed Mr. Cordis Bean, the deceased owner’s son, for information on past Site use. Mr. Bean has knowledge of the property spanning many decades, and currently resides at 198
Spring Street. Our interview with Mr. Bean was conducted on Site, where he identified relevant features. Information provided byMr. Bean has been incorporated into relevant sections
of this report.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 14 E N G I N E E R I N G Mr. Bean indicated an underground storage tank (UST) was formerly used to store gasoline at the Site. He indicated
the area where the UST was located, off the northeast corner of barn near Spring Street. His recollection is that the UST had a 100 gallon capacity. Use of the UST was discontinued when
it was determined to be leaking, approximately 50 years ago. He did not recall the tank being filled or formally abandoned. After that time, gasoline was brought to the Site in five
gallon containers; no replacement tank was installed. Mr. Bean indicated the solid waste fill area at the northern end of the property was originally a gulley that was filled over time
with solid waste materials from the residence and farm. Approximately thirty years ago, the City installed a large sewer line below the northern portion of the property. At that time,
the area was covered over with soil, and has not been used since. Mr. Bean did not recall disposal of hazardous materials in the area, and indicated that it received empty cans, bottles,
and other nonhazardous refuse. In regard to the orchard that was formerly located at the northern end of the Site, Mr. Bean indicated that pesticide applications had historically included
lead arsenate, DDT, malathion, and captan. Chemicals were typically mixed in a 200 gallon container at the north end of the Site. Water was pumped from the river near the orchard for
this purpose. The pesticides were then manually sprayed as the tank was pulled through the orchard, first by horses, and later by a tractor. Pesticides were stored in an off-site barn.
The orchard was cut down in approximately 1970. Remaining pesticides were cleared from the barn at that time, and donated or sold to another orchard. Field crops grown at the Site historically
included hay, corn and hubbard squash. Mr. Bean indicated these fields received fertilizer, but not pesticide applications. Agricultural use of the fields continued up until a few years
ago by Mr. Bean’s brother. Feeder pigs and chicken eggs were also historically produced. Hogs and chickens were kept in the hog house. Hogs were also sometimes kept in the hog shed,
and were turned out into fenced fields after corn harvesting. We observed the interior and exterior of the hog house in Mr. Bean’s company. He indicated the building was formerly heated
with coal, but now uses propane. There is one shallow dug well outside the northwestern corner of the building. The water from this well was used only for livestock, and is not plumbed
to residential supply lines. 7.1.2 Potential Purchaser/Site Manager Mr. Wayne Feiden of the City of Northampton Planning Department served as the Site Manager for this property. The
User Questionnaire completed byMr. Feiden is provided in Appendix A, and indicates the City is unaware of environmental impacts at the Site. The City is aware of the underground storage
tank formerly used for gasoline storage near the barn, a farm dump between two fields near the river, and historic use of pesticides and herbicides on the property during its use as
a farm and orchard. Mr. Feiden provided a Site plan identifying the main orchard at the north end of the property, as well as two smaller areas at the southern end of the property he
understands were historically used as orchards.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 15 E N G I N E E R I N G 7.2 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES We contacted the Northampton Department of Public Works to apply
for a trench permit in regard to our planned subsurface explorations. On December 2, 2009, Mr. Tom Smith of the DPW accompanied OTO on a Site visit, and identified the location of a
major drain line which runs approximately east-west across the northern portion of the Site, near the Mill River. OTO visited the Northampton Assessor’s Office, and Health Department
on January 8, 2010. OTO visited the Northampton Fire Department on December 29, 2009. Assessor’s records are discussed in Section 5.4.3. The Health Department did not identify any public
wells, septic systems, or health concerns at the Site. The Building Department did not have any permits or other relevant information on record for the property. Fire Department files
provided to us did not contain records of storage tanks at the Site. 8.0 PHASE I FINDINGS A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the approximately 47 acres of property on Spring
Street in Florence (Northampton), Massachusetts has been conducted by O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. (OTO). The Phase I assessment was prepared in conformance with the ASTM
Standard E1527-05. A summary of our findings and conclusions is presented below. Site Description The Site is comprised of approximately 47 acres of land which are currently vacant.
The property is listed with the Northampton Assessor’s office as map-block number 16C-025. The residence and abutting barn on that parcel were not included in our ESA. Site Use History
The Site and vicinity have been used for residential and agricultural purposes since at least 1900. An apple orchard was formerly located in the northern portion of the Site, and received
pesticide applications including lead arsenate, DDT, malathion and captan. The orchard was cut down in approximately 1970. Field crops produced at the Site have included hay, corn, and
hubbard squash. Feeder pigs and laying chickens were kept in the hog house in the central portion of the Site. A gulley at the northern end of the Site was historically filled with solid
waste materials from the farm and residence.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 16 E N G I N E E R I N G Storage Tanks One underground storage tank (UST) formerly used to store gasoline was identified on the northeastern
side of the barn/shop near Spring Street. The UST reportedly had a 100 gallon capacity, and its use was discontinued about 50 years ago when it was determined that the tank leaked. We
understand the tank was not formally abandoned, but remains in place empty. One above-ground storage tank was observed in the corn crib near the red barn. The tank appears to be empty
or nearly empty. That tank was reportedly previously used to store diesel fuel, and is currently out of service. Records Review No listings for the Site were identified during our review
of standard site assessment databases and files. A total of four State-listed spills/releases were identified at two locations within one mile of the subject Site. Details of the releases
were reviewed and the nearest release was approximately 0.75 miles from the Site. Based on on the information available in the FirstSearch report, online files from MassDEP, and on the
distance and the inferred groundwater flow direction with respect to the Site, none of the area listings are likely to impact Site soil and/or groundwater quality above MassDEP. Site
Reconnaissance The barn/shop near Spring Street was observed to be filled with containers, equipment and other debris. We did not have access to interior portions of the barn, so we
could not determine what the contents of the containers was, if any. Several of the containers appeared to have been automotive fluids. Interior portions of the hog house contained animal
pens and hay. A small amount of trash was observed in the upper level. No indications of an oil or hazardous material release were identified in the hog house. An old solid waste fill
area was observed at the northern end of the Site. The area appears to have been created in a gulley, a portion of which is still visible at the northern limit of filling. The area has
been largely covered with soil and is overgrown, therefore, for the most part, waste materials are not visible. Small piles of debris were also observed at other locations, primarily
in the vicinity of the house, barn and corn crib. Materials in these piles consisted of construction materials and empty steel drums. No indications of a reportable release were observed
during the Site visit. 8.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS We identified three Recognized Environmental Conditions, as defined in the ASTM Standard, during the course of our Phase
I assessment:
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 17 E N G I N E E R I N G 1. The historic apple orchards in which pesticides were applied; 2. The solid waste fill area at the northern
end of the Site; and 3. The underground storage tank previously used to store gasoline near the barn/shop. These three RECs were therefore assessed in our Phase II activities. 9.0 PHASE
II ASSESSMENT 9.1 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK Our Phase II assessment consisted of the following additional tasks which when combined with our Phase I report, meet the requirements of the
ASTM standard E1903-02 for Phase II assessments: 1. The advancement of seven soil borings; 2. the completion of two soil borings as a groundwater monitoring wells; 3. screening of soil
samples for volatile organic compounds (VOCs); 4. the collection and analysis of soil samples; and 5. the collection and analysis one groundwater sample. The activities are discussed
in the following sections. 9.2 SOIL BORINGS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION On December 23, 2009, seven soil borings (BF-1 through BF-7) were performed at the Site by Seaboard Environmental
Drilling of Chicopee, Massachusetts using a Geoprobe direct push drill rig. Boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Borings BF-1 and BF-2 were performed near the former underground storage
tank at the barn, and were completed as groundwater monitoring wells. Boring BF-3 was completed near the solid waste fill area at the north end of the property. Those borings were advanced
to depths of twelve feet below grade. Borings BF-4 through BF-7 were shallow (one foot depth) borings for the purpose of surface soil sample collection in the former orchard at the north
end of the Site. OTO observed the borings, and collected soil samples for classification and analysis. Materials encountered and screening results are presented in the soil boring logs,
attached in Appendix F. During advancement of the borings, soil samples were collected continuously in four foot long plastic sleeves. The sleeves were split open to expose the soils
recovered from each boring. Two soil samples, representative of the upper and lower two feet of material from each sleeve, were placed into jars. The tops of the jars were covered with
foil, and the jars were sealed and agitated to allow for the development of headspace vapors. Soil samples were then screened for VOCs using a TEI Model 580B photoionization (PID) calibrated
to read in parts per million as benzene. PID readings in each of the samples were zero.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 18 E N G I N E E R I N G 9.2.1 Former Underground Storage Tank Area Borings BF-1 and BF-2 were performed on the east side of the barn
near Spring Street, as shown on Figure 2, to assess groundwater quality in the vicinity of a former UST used for gasoline storage. Mr. Cordis Bean was on-site on the date of drilling,
and indicated the approximately location of the former UST. Based on the inferred groundwater flow direction, BF-2 is believed to be downgradient (north) of the UST. Subsurface materials
encountered at these locations were primarily fine sand with a little fine to coarse gravel. Groundwater was encountered at approximately eight feet below ground surface in this area.
One-inch diameter groundwater monitoring wells were placed in borings BF-1 and BF-2. The well screens were placed to span the groundwater table to allow for detection of a separate phase
floating petroleum layer, if present. Additional well construction details are provided on the boring logs in Appendix F. No gasoline odors, positive PID readings, or other indicators
of gasoline impacts were observed at either location. 9.2.2 Former Solid Waste Fill Area Boring BF-3 was performed at the northern end of the old solid waste fill area, which is located
west of the dirt road near the former orchard on the northern side of the property (see Figure 2). This boring was placed to be on the inferred downgradient (north) side of the fill.
We attempted to install a monitoring well at this location to assess groundwater quality, however, the borehole repeatedly collapsed above the water table. Three attempts were made at
adjacent locations, with collapse at the same depth in each case. Materials encountered at this location included approximately two feet of topsoil underlain by sand and gravel to approximately
ten feet below grade. Grey clayey silt was present at approximately
ten to twelve feet below grade, the maximum depth of exploration in this area. Because a monitoring well could not be installed in this area, we selected a soil sample collected from
the water saturated zone to submit for laboratory analysis. The samples from this boring did not have detectable PID readings, indicating volatile organic compounds are not present at
significant levels. A sample from the 10 to 12 foot depth obtained from BF-3 was analyzed for arsenic, lead, and pesticides at Con-Test Analytical Laboratory (Con-Test) of East Longmeadow,
Massachusetts under chain-of-custody procedures. A copy of the laboratory report is provided in Appendix G. As shown on Table 2, arsenic and pesticides were not detected in the soil
sample from BF-3. Lead was detected, but at a low level consistent with natural background. 9.2.3 Surface Soils in Former Orchard The ground surface was frozen on the date of our explorations.
The Geoprobe rig was therefore used to collect surface soil samples from the former orchard area, which is currently an open field. The locations of shallow soil samples BF-4 through
BF-7 are shown on Figure 2. These borings were placed to provide coverage of different portions of the former orchard. In each
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 19 E N G I N E E R I N G case, a sample was collected from approximately the upper twelve inches of material, and was submitted for laboratory
analysis of lead, arsenic, and pesticides. A copy of the laboratory report is provided in Appendix E. Soil analytical results are summarized on Table 2. As shown, arsenic and dieldrin
were detected in three of the four shallow soil samples at levels above MCP Reportable Concentrations (RCS-1). Dieldrin is a very persistent insecticide that was widely used in the 1950s
to 1970s. Other pesticides were detected in Site soil, but at levels below RCS-1s, including 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE and 4,4’-DDT. Lead was detected in each sample at levels below the RCS-1,
and, with the exception of BF-4, consistent with natural background levels in Massachusetts soil. 9.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING A groundwater sample was collected from monitoring well BF-2
on December 29, 2009. This well is located adjacent and on the presumed downgradient side of the former gasoline UST. The sample was collected using a pre-cleaned, single-use PVC bailer.
Prior to sampling, approximately five times the volume of standing water in the well was removed to purge stagnant water and permit collection of a sample representative of formation
water. The sample was submitted to Con-Test for volatile petroleum hydrocarbon (VPH) analysis, which is the MassDEP method used to detect gasoline-range petroleum constituents. It was
also analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270C, including tentatively identified compounds. This method is capable of detecting multiple heavier petroleum
constituents, such as might be associated with oils, as well as many pesticides. While Site history does not indicate pesticides would have been applied near the barn, they may have
been stored and/or mixed in this area. A copy of the laboratory report is provided in Appendix E. Groundwater analytical data are summarized on Table 3. As shown, VPH and SVOCs were
not detected. 10.0 OPINION AND CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standards
E1527-05 and E1903-02 of the property at 209 Spring Street in Northampton, Massachusetts, exclusive of the residence and barn abutting the residence. Any exceptions to, or deletions
from this practice are described in Sections 2.4 and 10.0 of this report. Three Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified during our Phase I assessment activities. Phase
II activities were conducted to assess these RECS, as described in the following sections. 10.1 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK A 100 gallon underground storage tank (UST) is located near the
northeastern corner of the barn/shop near Spring Street. Use of the tank was reportedly discontinued when it was determined to be leaking, approximately 50 years ago. The tank is believed
to remain below grade, unfilled. Field screening of soil samples and laboratory analysis of a groundwater groundwater sample
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 20 E N G I N E E R I N G from the UST area did not indicate the presence of gasoline. However, to come into compliance with Massachusetts
tank regulations, and for safety considerations, we recommend the UST be removed. If possible, we recommend the UST be removed prior to closing, as the exact location of the UST is unknown,
and the favorable groundwater testing does not preclude the presence of impacted soil. 10.2 PESTICIDES IN ORCHARD Pesticides were identified in shallow soil in the historic apple orchard
area at the north end of the Site. The orchard was cut down in approximately 1970. The area is currently an open agricultural field. Arsenic and dieldrin were detected above Massachusetts
Contingency Plan (MCP) Reportable Concentrations in soil samples collected from this area. In the absence of specific data on soil conditions within the two smaller orchard areas at
the southern end of the Site, those areas should also be presumed to be impacted with lead, arsenic and organic pesticides. The MCP, at 310 CMR 40.0317(8)(c), contains an exemption from
MassDEP notification for pesticides applied in a manner consistent with their labeling. Based on this historic use of this property as an orchard, the similar levels detected at the
sample locations, this exemption likely applies to Site conditions. While we do not believe the orchard conditions represent a reportable release of oil or hazardous materials under
state or federal regulations, the results may have public health implications depending on planned future of the of the property. We would be pleased to meet with the City to discuss
these implications. 10.3 SOLID WASTE FILL AREA An abandoned private solid waste fill area is located at the north end of the property. The area was formerly a gulley, and was reportedly
filled with household and farm debris such as cans, bottles and other trash. No disposal of hazardous materials in the area was reported, however, we presume that materials such as “empty”
pesticide containers were disposed of here. Use of the area reportedly stopped approximately 30 years ago, when the area was covered with soil. For the most part, fill materials were
therefore not visible during our Site reconnaissance. We were unable to install a groundwater monitoring well in this area due to subsurface conditions. A soil sample from the water
saturated zone downgradient of the fill did not contain lead, arsenic or other pesticides at levels above Reportable Concentrations. However, the contents of the fill area are unknown,
and there may be oil or hazardous materials present within the waste. Based on the limited visual indicators of fill area available due to soil cover, we estimate the fill covers a 20
foot by 80 foot area. If the fill is ten feet thick, there could be an estimated 300 cubic yards of solid waste in this area. We recommend you use caution in your future use of this
area. If development of the fill area is planned, explorations should be conducted to further characterize the materials present.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 21 E N G I N E E R I N G 10.4 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS Additionally, the barn/shop near Spring Street is cluttered with a large volume of debris
including drums, buckets, and smaller containers which may hold automotive fluids, pesticides, and/or other oil or hazardous materials. We did not have access to the barn interior for
a complete reconnaissance, therefore the types and volumes of oil and/or hazardous materials present, if any, are unknown. We recommend you use care to properly dispose of these materials.
11.0 DEVIATIONS We are not aware of significant deletions or deviations from the ASTM E1527-05 practice used to prepare this report. We did not encounter significant data gaps in conducting
our Phase I ESA report. 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Subsurface explorations conducted as part of this investigation are discussed in Section 9.0. Otherwise, no additional services outside
of the ASTM E1527-05 practice were requested or have been performed in completing this this environmental site assessment. 13.0 REFERENCES FirstSearch Technology Corporation, Environmental
FirstSearch Report, Target Property: Spring Street, Florence, Massachusetts. Prepared for O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc., dated December 1, 2009. Northampton Assessor’s Office,
records review, January 8, 2010. Northampton Fire Department, storage tank records request, December 29, 2009. Northampton Health Department, records request, January 8, 2010. Forbes
Library, Northampton, Massachusetts, historical research, December 29, 2009. Massachusetts Geographic Information Systems (MassGIS) Priority Resource 21 E Map, online review, November
30, 2009. Mr. Cordis Bean, personal interview, December 23, 2009. 14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT Kevin J. O’Reilly and Valerie D. Tillinghast declare that, to the best of
our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in Part 312.10 of CFR 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education,
training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. We
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 22 E N G I N E E R I N G have developed and performed the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth
in 40 CFR Part 312. 15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Kevin J. O'Reilly, a Principal of OTO, specializes in hydrogeology, waste site characterization and remediation.
He brings over 20 years of experience to every project. A Licensed Site Professional (LSP), he was a director of the LSP Association and a member of the Regulations Committee. He chaired
the LSPA sub-committee that worked with the MassDEP on first year revisions to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Valerie Tillinghast is an LSP and a Senior Project Manager with 20
years of professional experience. She has a strong technical and chemistry background, and specializes in waste site characterization and reporting in accordance with the Massachusetts
Contingency Plan (MCP). Further information on staff qualifications is provided in Appendix H.
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] 23 E N G I N E E R I N G 16.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS AST Above-ground Storage Tank AUL Activity and Use Limitation BMP Best Management Practices
CMR Code of Massachusetts Regulations CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability ACT CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
ACT Information System DEPNFA No further action is necessary per MassDEP EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPH Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons ESA Environmental Site Assessment
LSP Licensed Site Professional LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MassDEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MassGIS Massachusetts Geographic Information System
MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan MGL Massachusetts General Laws MGP Manufactured gas plant NHESP Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program NOI Notice of Intent NPL National Priority
List NSR No Significant Risk OHM Oil and/or Hazardous Materials OTO O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun Associates, Inc. PAHs Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls RAO
Response Action Outcome RC Reportable Concentration RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RTN Release Tracking Number SQG Small Quantity Generator TSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Facilities TCLP Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure UST Underground Storage Tank VSQG Very Small Quantity Generator WPA Wetlands Protection Act
TABLES
Table 1 Standard Environmental Records Sources Lists Appropriate Minimum Search Radius (miles) Federal NPL site list 1.0 Federal Delisted NPL site list 0.5 Federal CERCLIS list 0.5 Federal
CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0.5 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1.0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0.5 Federal RCRA generators list 0.25 Federal Inst/Eng Controls 0.5
Federal ERNS list 0.15 GW Classification Target Property State and Tribal hazardous waste sites 1.0 State and Tribal landfills or solid waste disposal sites 0.5 State and Tribal LUST/LAST
0.5 State and Tribal registered storage tank list 0.25 State and Tribal institutional controls 0.25 State and Tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.5 State and Tribal Brownfield sites 0.5
Table 2 Soil Analytical Results Concentrations in mg/kg Former Bean Farm Northampton, MA Area: dump former orchard Location: BF-3 BF-4 BF-5 BF-6 BF-7 MassDEP Reportable Depth (feet):
10-12 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 Natural Soil Conc. Date Collected: 12/23/09 12/23/09 12/23/09 12/23/09 12/23/09 Background RCS-1 METALS Arsenic <2.7 38 32 22 27 20 20 Lead 3.9 130 85 4.8 36 100
300 PESTICIDES Aldrin <0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 0.04 alpha-BHC <0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 50 beta-BHC <0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 10 delta-BHC
<0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 10 gamma-BHC (Lindane) <0.0033 <0.0034 <0.0034 <0.0032 <0.0035 NA 0.003 Chlordane <0.022 <0.023 <0.023 <0.021 <0.023 NA 0.7 4,4'-DDD <0.0088
0.016 <0.0092 <0.0085 <0.0092 NA 4 4,4'-DDE <0.0044 0.35 0.33 0.0079 0.17 NA 3 4,4'-DDT <0.0088 0.55 0.29 <0.0085 0.19 NA 3 Dieldrin <0.0088 0.41 0.32 0.027 0.26 NA 0.05 Endosulfan I
<0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 0.0069 NA 0.5 Endosulfan II <0.0088 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0085 0.025 0.025 NA 0.5 Endosulfan Sulfate <0.0088 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0085 0.05 NA NS Endrin <0.0088
<0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0085 <0.0092 NA 8 Endrin Ketone <0.0088 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0085 <0.0092 NA NS Heptachlor <0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 0.2 Heptachlor Epoxide <0.0055
<0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 0.09 Hexachlorobenzene <0.0055 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.0053 <0.0058 NA 0.7 Methoxychlor <0.055 <0.057 <0.057 <0.053 <0.058 NA 200 NOTES: 1. Concentrations
in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg, or parts per million) on a dry weight basis. 2. "<" indicates not detected; value is sample-specific quantitation limit. 3. "RCS-" = Reportable concentration
from 310 CMR 40.1600. 4. Background values from MassDEP "Technical Update: Background Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Metals in Soil", May 23, 2002. 5. Values shown in
bold exceed Method 1 standards. 6. "NA" = Not applicable or not available. "NS" indicates no standard. F:\J0600\J0200\285 City of Northampton\14-01 Bean Farm ESA\Report\Soil Data Bean.xls,
m
etalsTable 3 Groundwater Analytical Results Concentrations in mg/l Former Bean Farm Northampton, MA Well No.: BF-2 Sample Date: 12/29/09 RCGW-1 VPH Fractions C5-C8 Aliphatics < 0.1 0.3
C9-C12 Aliphatics < 0.1 0.7 C9-C10 Aromatics < 0.1 0.2 VPH Target Compounds Benzene < 0.001 0.005 Ethylbenzene < 0.001 0.7 Methyl tert-butyl ether < 0.001 0.07 Naphthalene < 0.01 0.14
Toluene < 0.001 1 Xylenes (total) < 0.003 5 Semivolatile Organic Compounds none detected vary Tentatively Identified SVOCs none vary NOTES: 1. Concentrations in milligrams per liter
(mg/l, or parts per million). 2. "<" indicates not detected; value is quantitation limit. 3. RCGW-1 = Reportable concentration for groundwater, from 310 CMR 40.1600. 4. VPH=Volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons. SVOCs=Semivolatile organic compounds. F:\J0200\285 City of Northampton\14-01 Bean Farm ESA\Report\GW data.xls, ephvph
FIGURES
January, 2010 Figure 1 Bean Farm Northampton, Massachusetts N O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] SITE C 2003 National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Topographic Map Quadrant:
Easthampton, MA Map Version: 1975 Current as of: 1979
Base photograph from Office of Geographic and Environmental Information, Mass. Executive Office of Environmental Affairs on-line, 1/4/2010 O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN SITE PLAN ASSOCIATES,
INC. BEAN FARM; 209 SPRING STREET NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS Job No. 285-14-01 DATE: JANUARY 2010 FIGURE NO.: 2 APPROXIMATE SITE LIMITS MILL RIVER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER ORCHARD
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF FORMER ORCHARDS HOG HOUSE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FILL AREA BF-3 BF-4 BF-2 BF-1 BF-5BF-6BF-7 LEGEND: Soil boring by OTO 12/23/2009 Gasoline underground storage
tank BARN/SHOP CORN CRIB HOG SHED HOUSE AND BARN NOT PART OF SITE
Source: Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS), Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs on-line mapping, 11/30/2009 O'REILLY, TALBOT
& OKUN FORMER BEAN FARM DEP PRIORITY ASSOCIATES, INC. NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS RESOURCE MAP Job No. 285-14-01 DATE: NOVEMBER 2009 FIGURE NO.: 3 SITE
APPENDIX A USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Page 1 of 3 ASTM E1527-05 User Questionnaire Site Name and Address: Bean Farm, Spring Street, Florence, City of Northampton Owner: Bean Family. The City of Northampton hopes to purchase.
Occupant: Bean Family Form Completed By: Wayne Feiden Date: January 11, 2010 Representing: City of Northampton In order to qualify for one of the landowner liability protections (LLPs)
offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfield Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”), the user must provide the following information (if available)
to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. (1.) Are you aware of any environmental
cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? If “yes”, please list all that apply. NO we are not (2.) Are you aware of any
Activity and Use Limitations (AULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the Site and/or have been filed or recorded in
a registry under federal, tribal, state or local laws? If “yes”, please list all that apply. NO, we are not.
Page 2 of 3 (3.) As the user of this ESA, do you have specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line
of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type
of business? If “yes”, please explain. NO. (4.) a) Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? YES, we believe so.
b) If you answered “no” to the above, do you believe that a lower purchase price is the result of either a known or suspected contamination at the property. If “yes”, please explain.
(5.) Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases
or threatened releases? For example, as user: Do you know of past uses of the property? If “yes”, please list. Property has been in farming for at least 150 years. This included an orchard
along the Mill River, some apple trees closer to the road, a farm dump between two fields close to the river, and a report of an old gasoline tank abandoned in place at the barn closest
to Spring Street. Do you know of specific chemicals that are or once were present at the property? If “yes”, what kind of chemicals? NO, but we know that the orchard was treated with
herbicides and pesticides. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? If “yes”, please list. NO, although the farm dump history is unknown
to us. Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? If “yes”, please list. NO. (6.) As the user of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience
related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? If “yes”, please explain.
Page 3 of 3 The orchard, with whatever herbicides and pesticides that were applied, the historic farm dump, and the reported abandoned-in-place gasoline tank at the front barn are all
a concern to us, although we don’t know the details and don’t know if there are any sites or spills.
APPENDIX B FIRSTSEARCH REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT
FirstSearch Technology Corporation Environmental FirstSearch Report TM Target Property: SPRING ST FLORENCE MA 01062 Job Number: 0285-14-01 PREPARED FOR: O'Reilly Talbot and Okun Associates
293 Bridge Street, Suite 300 Springfield, MA 01103 12-01-09 Tel: (781) 551-0470 Fax: (781) 551-0471 Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation.
All rights reserved.
Environmental FirstSearch Search Summary Report Target Site: SPRING ST FLORENCE MA 01062 FirstSearch Summary Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 09-11-09
1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NPL Delisted Y 09-11-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 CERCLIS Y 10-01-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 NFRAP Y 10-01-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 RCRA COR ACT Y 10-14-09 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA TSD
Y 10-14-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 RCRA GEN Y 10-14-09 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0 Federal IC /EC Y 10-01-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 ERNS Y 09-13-09 0.12 0 0 ---2 2 Tribal Lands Y 12-01-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 2
2 State/Tribal Sites Y 09-29-09 1.00 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 State Spills 90 Y 09-29-09 0.12 0 0 ---1 1 State/Tribal SWL Y 04-01-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 State/Tribal LUST Y 09-29-09 0.50 0 0 0 0
-0 0 State/Tribal UST/AST Y 09-11-09 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0 State/Tribal EC Y NA 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 State/Tribal IC Y 09-29-09 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0 State/Tribal VCP Y NA 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 State/Tribal
Brownfields Y NA 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0 State Other Y 01-01-07 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0 -TOTALS -0 0 0 0 4 5 9 9 Notice of Disclaimer Due to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness
of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal,
state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size.
The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and
do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the
actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such information. Waiver
Waiver of Liability Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant
the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSearch
Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site
locations.
Environmental FirstSearch Site Information Report Request Date: 12-01-09 Search Type: COORD Requestor Name: Sabrina Moreau Job Number: 0285-14-01 Standard: AAI Target Site: SPRING ST
FLORENCE MA 01062 Demographics Sites: 9 Non-Geocoded: 5 Population: 2209 Radon: NA Site Location Degrees (Decimal) Degrees (Min/Sec) UTMs Longitude: -72.689305 -72:41:21 Easting: 690354.337
Latitude: 42.340004 42:20:24 Northing: 4689899.57 Elevation: 257 Zone: 18 Comment Comment: Additional Requests/Services Adjacent ZIP Codes: 1 Mile(s) Services: ZIP Code City Name ST
Dist/Dir Sel 01053 LEEDS MA 0.23 NW Y Requested? Date Fire Insurance Maps No Aerial Photographs No Historical Topos No City Directories No Title Search/Env Liens No Municipal Reports
No Online Topos No
Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 TOTAL: 9 GEOCODED: 4 NON GEOCODED: 5 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status
Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 1 STATE BOULEYS SERVICE CENTER 32 HAYDENVILLE RD 0.76 NW + 41 1 1-0000906/TIERII LEEDS MA 01053 2 STATE PRO-CORPORATION PMC 296 NONOTUCK ST 0.90 SE
-11 3 1-0016060/TIERII FLORENCE MA 01062 2 STATE PRO CORPORATION PMC 296 NONOTUCK ST 0.90 SE -11 5 1-0013695/RAO FLORENCE MA 01062 2 STATE NO LOCATION AID 296 NONOTUCK ST 0.90 SE -11
6 1-0013121/RAO FLORENCE MA 01062
Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 TOTAL: 9 GEOCODED: 4 NON GEOCODED: 5 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status
Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. TRIBALLAND BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT I UNKNOWN NON GC N/A N/A BIA-01053 MA 01053 TRIBALLAND BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT I UNKNOWN NON GC
N/A N/A BIA-01062 MA 01062 SPILLS POLE 4-03 PINE NON GC N/A N/A 1-0014568/RAO FLORENCE MA 01062 ERNS WHITING ENERGY FUEL SIX STRTS:STRAW/VERONA/GARF NON GC N/A N/A 190641 FLORENCE MA
01062 ERNS IN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING AT THE IN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING NON GC N/A N/A NRC-916708/FIXED FLORENCE MA 01062
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.76 NW ELEVATION: 298 MAP ID: 1 NAME: BOULEYS
SERVICE CENTER REV: 9/29/09 ADDRESS: 32 HAYDENVILLE RD ID1: 1-0000906 NORTHAMPTON MA 01060 ID2: HAMPSHIRE STATUS: TIERII CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP SITE INFORMATION STATUS: TIER
2 -A site/release receiving a total NRS score less than 350, unless the site meets any of the Tier 1 Inclusionary Criteria (CMR 40.0520(2)(a)). Permits are not required at Tier 2 sites/releases
and response actions may be performed under the supervision of an LSP without prior DEP approval. All pre-1993 transition sites that have accepted waivers are categoricallyTier 2 sites.
STATUS: TIER 2 -A site/release receiving a total NRS score less than 350, unless the site meets any of the Tier 1 Inclusionary Criteria (CMR 40.0520(2)(a)). Permits are not required
at Tier 2 sites/releases and response actions may be performed under the supervision of an LSP without prior DEP approval. All pre-1993 transition sites that have accepted waivers are
categoricallyTier 2 sites. LTBI: CONFIRMED: DELETED: REMOVED: LTBI: 10/15/1991 CONFIRMED: DELETED: REMOVED: LTBI: CONFIRMED: DELETED: REMOVED: LOCATION TYPE: GASSTATION, FORMER, SOURCE:
UST; SITE DESCRIPTION: V.O.C. S PRESENT; RELEASE TO SOIL; FORMER; GAS STATION; GROUNDWATER RELEASE; CONTAINED IN A LUST; OTHER CONTAMINATION: OTHER RELEASES: OTHER PROBLEMS: OTHER TYPE
OF SITE: CHEMICALS VOCS SITE ACTIONS LSP INVOLVED: THOMAS DUFFIELD ACT DATE: 10/15/1991 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: VALID TRANSITION SITE ACT TYPE: RELEASE DISPOSITION RAO CLASS:
ACT DATE: 2/16/1999 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: ISSUED ACT TYPE: NOTICE OF RESPONSIBILITY -Continued on next page -Site Details Page -1
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.76 NW ELEVATION: 298 MAP ID: 1 NAME: BOULEYS
SERVICE CENTER REV: 9/29/09 ADDRESS: 32 HAYDENVILLE RD ID1: 1-0000906 NORTHAMPTON MA 01060 ID2: HAMPSHIRE STATUS: TIERII CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 5/30/2001
ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: INTERIM DEADLINE LETTER ISSUED ACT TYPE: COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 5/30/2001 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: ISSUED ACT TYPE: NOTICE
OF RESPONSIBILITY RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 3/20/2002 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: NON ACT TYPE: COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 8/13/2002 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS:
ACO ACT TYPE: COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 2/26/2003 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED ACT TYPE: TIER CLASSIFICATION RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 2/26/2003
ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: TIER 2 CLASSIFICATION ACT TYPE: TIER CLASSIFICATION RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 2/26/2003 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: COMPLETION STATEMENT RECEIVED ACT TYPE:
PHASE 1 RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 4/4/2007 ACT USE LIMITATION: ACT STATUS: FLDRUN ACT TYPE: SITE VISIT OR COMPLIANCE INSPECTION RAO CLASS: Site Details Page -2
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE
MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: 0.90 SE ELEVATION: 246 MAP ID: 2 NAME: PRO-CORPORATION PMC REV: 12/3/07 ADDRESS: 296 NONOTUCK ST ID1: 1-0016060 FLORENCE MA 01062 ID2: HAMPSHIRE
STATUS: TIERII CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP SITE INFORMATION STATUS: TIER 2 -A site/release receiving a total NRS score less than 350, unless the site meets any of the Tier 1 Inclusionary
Criteria (CMR 40.0520(2)(a)). Permits are not required at Tier 2 sites/releases and response actions may be performed under the supervision of an LSP without prior DEP approval. All
pre-1993 transition sites that have accepted waivers are categoricallyTier 2 sites. LOCATION TYPE: INDUSTRIAL, SOURCE: UNKNOWN; SITE DESCRIPTION: CHEMICALS UNKNOWN CHEMICAL OF UNKNOWN
TYPE .5 INCH SITE ACTIONS ACT DATE: 1/20/2006 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: ACT STATUS: REPORTABLE RELEASE UNDER MGL 21E ACT TYPE: RELEASE DISPOSITION RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 1/29/2007 ACT USE
LIMITATION: LSP: 4589 ACT STATUS: COMPLETION STATEMENT RECEIVED ACT TYPE: PHASE 1 RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 1/29/2007 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: 4589 ACT STATUS: SCOPE OF WORK RECEIVED ACT
TYPE: PHASE 2 RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 4/11/2006 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: ACT STATUS: REPORTABLE RELEASE UNDER MGL 21E ACT TYPE: RELEASE NOTIFICATION RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 1/29/2007 ACT USE
LIMITATION: -Continued on next page -Site Details Page -3
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: 0.90 SE ELEVATION: 246 MAP ID: 2 NAME: PRO-CORPORATION
PMC REV: 12/3/07 ADDRESS: 296 NONOTUCK ST ID1: 1-0016060 FLORENCE MA 01062 ID2: HAMPSHIRE STATUS: TIERII CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP LSP: ACT STATUS: TIER 2 CLASSIFICATION ACT TYPE:
TIER CLASSIFICATION RAO CLASS: ACT DATE: 8/29/2007 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: 4589 ACT STATUS: RMRINT ACT TYPE: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION RAO CLASS: Site Details Page -4
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.90 SE ELEVATION: 246 MAP ID: 2 NAME: PRO CORPORATION
PMC REV: 6/19/02 ADDRESS: 296 NONOTUCK ST ID1: 1-0013695 FLORENCE MA 01062 ID2: STATUS: RAO CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP SITE INFORMATION STATUS: DEF TIER 1B -(Default Tier 1B): A
site/release where the responsible party fails to provide a required submittal to DEP by a specified deadline. CATEGORY: TWO HR 21E STATUS: DEF TIER 1B DATE: 12/8/2000 21E DATE: 12/17/2001
PHASE: HAZMAT TYPE: RAO CLASS: LOCATION TYPE: INDUSTRIAL, SOURCE: PIPE; SITE DESCRIPTION: CHEMICALS UNKNOWN CHEMICAL OF UNKNOWN TYPE 25 GAL SITE ACTIONS ACT DATE: 12/08/2000 ACT USE
LIMITATION: LSP: TIMOTHY OBRIEN ACT STATUS: ORAL APPROVAL OF PLAN ACT TYPE: IRA: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION RAO TYPE: ACT DATE: 11/21/2000 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: TIMOTHY OBRIEN ACT
STATUS: REPORTABLE RELEASE UNDER MGL 21E ACT TYPE: RELEASE DISPOSITION RAO TYPE: ACT DATE: 12/08/2000 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: ACT STATUS: REPORTABLE RELEASE UNDER MGL 21E ACT TYPE:
RELEASE NOTIFICATION RAO TYPE: Site Details Page -5
Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 STATE SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.90 SE ELEVATION: 246 MAP ID: 2 NAME: NO LOCATION
AID REV: 8/1/01 ADDRESS: 296 NONOTUCK ST ID1: 1-0013121 FLORENCE MA 01062 ID2: STATUS: RAO CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: MA DEP SITE INFORMATION CATEGORY: 120 DY 21E STATUS: TIER 2 DATE: 9/20/99
21E DATE: 9/20/00 PHASE: PHASE II HAZMAT TYPE: OIL AND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RAO CLASS: LOCATION TYPE: SOURCE: SITE DESCRIPTION: CHEMICALS UNKNOWN CHEMICAL OF UNKNOWN TYPE 4.3 MG/KG UNKNOWN
CHEMICAL OF UNKNOWN TYPE 3.4 MG/KG 1,1 -BIPHENYL, CHLORO-DERIVS. 8.74 MG/KG UNKNOWN CHEMICAL OF UNKNOWN TYPE 2.6 MG/KG SITE ACTIONS ACT DATE: 12/14/2000 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: TIMOTHY
OBRIEN ACT STATUS: STATUS REPORT RECEIVED ACT TYPE: RAM: RELEASE ABATEMENT MEASURE RAO TYPE: ACT DATE: 09/20/2000 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: TIMOTHY OBRIEN ACT STATUS: COMPLETION STATEMENT
RECEIVED ACT TYPE: PHASEI: PHASE I RAO TYPE: ACT DATE: 09/20/2000 ACT USE LIMITATION: LSP: TIMOTHY OBRIEN ACT STATUS: TIER 2 CLASSIFICATION ACT TYPE: TCLASS: TIER CLASSIFICATION RAO
TYPE: Site Details Page -6
Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within .25 Mile(s) of Target Property Target Property: SPRING ST JOB: 0285-14-01 FLORENCE MA 01062 Street Name Dist/Dir Street
Name Dist/Dir Chesterfield Rd 0.22 NW Col Lavalley Ln 0.18 SE Fairway Village 0.25 NW Spring St 0.11 SW
Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites SPRING ST, FLORENCE MA 01062 Source: 2005 U.S. Census TIGER Files Target Site (Latitude: 42.340004 Longitude:
-72.689305) ............................. Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .......................................................... NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill
(SWL), Hazardous Waste Triballand............................................................................................................ Railroads ...............................................
............................................................ Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL SPRING ST, FLORENCE MA 01062 Source: 2005 U.S. Census TIGER Files Target Site (Latitude: 42.340004 Longitude:
-72.689305) ............................. Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .......................................................... NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill
(SWL), Hazardous Waste Triballand............................................................................................................ Railroads ...............................................
............................................................ Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST SPRING ST, FLORENCE MA 01062 Source: 2005 U.S. Census TIGER Files Target Site (Latitude: 42.340004 Longitude: -72.689305)
............................. Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .......................................................... NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL),
Hazardous Waste Triballand............................................................................................................ Railroads ......................................................
..................................................... Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius Non-ASTM Map: No Sites Found SPRING ST, FLORENCE MA 01062 Source: 2005 U.S. Census TIGER Files Target Site (Latitude: 42.340004 Longitude: -72.689305)
............................. Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .......................................................... NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL),
Hazardous Waste Triballand............................................................................................................ National Historic Sites and Landmark Sites .....................
................................. Railroads ........................................................................................................... Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile
Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
APPENDIX C HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX D FIRE DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX E SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTOGRAPHS OF BEAN FARM SITE, FLORENCE (NORTHAMPTON), TAKEN ON DECEMBER 23, 2009 Page 1 of 2 Photo 1. Containers inside barn. Photo 2. Containers inside barn. Photo 3. Boring BF-3;
dump in background, overgrown. Photo 4. Tires and other debris; use of drum for footing.
PHOTOGRAPHS OF BEAN FARM SITE, FLORENCE (NORTHAMPTON), TAKEN ON DECEMBER 23, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Photo 5. Utility area inside hog house; propane heater, water pump. Photo 6. Debris in upper
level of hog house. Photo 7. Storage tank in shed. Photo 8. Former orchard area.
APPENDIX F BORING/MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION LOGS
O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-1 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT NO.
J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 3 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) 8 SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION SE side of barn HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL WELL FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION BL/6 IN. medium 40/48 S-1 brown, fine to coarse SAND, some fine Gravel, 0 Sandy Fill (0'-4') trace Silt (dry) 1' 2' 0 medium 38/48 S-2 brown, fine to coarse SAND, some fine
to coarse Gravel, (4'-8') trace Silt (dry) 0 5 0 medium 46/48 S-3 gray fine SAND, little fine to coarse Gravel, trace Silt, concrete fragment at 10' (8'-12') (wet) 0 10 0 End of exploration
at 12' 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates
none detected 2. 1" diameter PVC well set at 12' below ground surface, screen 12'-2', solid PVC riser to approximately one foot above grave. Sand pack 12'-1', bentonite clay 1' to ground
surface.
O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-2 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT NO.
J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 3 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) 8 SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION ESE side of barn, next to former UST HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL WELL FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS
DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION BL/6 IN. medium 42/48 S-1 brown, fine to coarse SAND, little coarse Gravel, trace Silt (dry) 0 Fine Sand (0'-4') 2' 0 3' medium 45/48 S-2 top half: brown, fine
to coarse SAND, little coarse Gravel, trace Silt (dry) (4'-8') 0 5 bottom half: gray fine SAND, trace Silt (wet at bottom) 0 medium 46/48 S-3 gray fine SAND, trace Silt (wet) (8'-12')
0 (hole collapsed to 8') 10 0 End of exploration at 12' 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air.
Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none detected 2. Hole collapsed repeatedly to eight feet; could not set well at twelve feet. 3. 1" diameter PVC well set at 8'
below ground surface, screen 8'-3', solid PVC riser to approximately one foot above grave. Sand pack 8'-2', bentonite clay 2' to ground surface.
O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-3 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT NO.
J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 1 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) 8' SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT
DROP LOCATION north side of old dump HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL WELL FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS
DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION BL/6 IN. easy 46/48 S-1 brown, fine SAND and SILT, roots (dry) 0 Topsoil (0'-4') 0 medium 43/48 S-2 top half: brown fine to coarse SAND and fine Gravel, trace
Silt (dry) Sand and Gravel (4'-8') 0 5 (hole collapsed to 4.5') bottom half: gray coarse GRAVEL, some fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt (dry) 0 medium 37/48 S-3 top half: gray fine to
coarse SAND, some coarse Gravel, trace Silt, some rust (8'-12') colored staining (wet) 0 10 bottom half: gray Clayey SILT (wet) Clayey Silt 0 End of exploration at 12' 15 20 25 Remarks:
1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector (PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none detected 2. Hole
collapsed repeatedly to approximately 4.5 feet. Placed five foot length of 1" diameter PVC well screen in hole, but expect this well will be dry.
O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-4 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT NO.
J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 1 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION former orchard HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL REMARKS FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS DESCRIPTION
BL/6 IN. medium 10/12 S-1 brown, fine SAND and SILT 0 Topsoil (0'-4') End of exploration at 1' 5 10 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector
(PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none d
etectedO'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-5 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT
NO. J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 1 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION former orchard HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL REMARKS FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS DESCRIPTION
BL/6 IN. medium 10/12 S-1 brown, fine SAND and SILT 0 Topsoil (0'-4') End of exploration at 1' 5 10 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector
(PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none detected
O'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-6 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT NO.
J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 1 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION former orchard HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL REMARKS FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS DESCRIPTION
BL/6 IN. medium 10/12 S-1 brown, fine SAND and SILT 0 Topsoil (0'-4') End of exploration at 1' 5 10 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector
(PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none d
etectedO'REILLY, TALBOT & OKUN ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING BF-7 Page 1 OF 1 PROJECT Bean Farm LOCATION Northampton, MA PROJECT
NO. J285 01 01 DRILLING CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Dave DATE STARTED DATE FINISHED Seaboard Environmental Drilling HELPER 12/23/2009 12/23/2009 DRILLING EQUIPMENT COMPLETION DEPTH GROUND SURFACE
ELEV. Geoprobe DATUM TYPE BIT SIZE &TYPE OF CORE BARREL No. Sample 1 UNDIST. CASING TIME FIRST COMPL. HR. CASING HAMM. WEIGHT DROP WATER LEVEL (FT.) SAMPLER BORING SAMPLER WEIGHT DROP
LOCATION former orchard HAMMER ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST Valerie Tillinghast SAMPLES SAMPLES DEPTH PENETR. REC. TYPE/DESCRIPTION FIELD SOIL REMARKS FT. RESIST. IN. NO. MEASUREMENTS DESCRIPTION
BL/6 IN. medium 10/12 S-1 brown, fine SAND and SILT 0 Topsoil (0'-4') End of exploration at 1' 5 10 15 20 25 Remarks: 1. Soil screened in field using TEI Model 580B photoionization detector
(PID) referenced to benzene in air. Readings in parts per million by volume. "ND" indicates none detected
APPENDIX G LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 January 4, 2010 Valerie Tillinghast OTO Associates 293 Bridge St. Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103
Project Location: Bean Client Job Number: Project Number: 285-14-01 Laboratory Work Order Number: 09L0659 Enclosed are results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on December
24, 2009. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Susan M. Burney Project Manager Page 1 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY OTO Associates 1/4/2010 293 Bridge St. Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 ATTN: Valerie
Tillinghast 285-14-01 09L0659 The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON-TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report. PROJECT LOCATION: PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: REPORT DATE: WORK ORDER NUMBER: FIELD SAMPLE # LAB ID: MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST SUB LAB Bean BF-4 0-1' 09L0659-01 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010B SW-846
8081A BF-5 0-1' 09L0659-02 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010B SW-846 8081A BF-6 0-1' 09L0659-03 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010B SW-846 8081A BF-7 0-1' 09L0659-04 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010B SW-846
8081A BF-3 10-12' 09L0659-05 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010B SW-846 8081A Page 2 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives
unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report. For method 6010, only As and Pb were requested and reported. SW-846 8081A Qualifications: Result was confirmed using a dissimilar
column. Relative percent difference between the two results was >40%. The higher result was reported. Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified: 4,4'-DDD, 4,4'-DDD [2C] 09L0659-01[BF-4 0-1'] The
results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to the Con-Test Analytical Laboratory for testing. I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed
as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuuals immediately
responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Michael A. Erickson Laboratory Director
Page 3 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-01 Field Sample #: BF-4 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:45 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Organochloride
Pesticides by GC/ECD Aldrin [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB alpha-BHC [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB beta-BHC [1]
ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB delta-BHC [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB gamma-BHC (Lindane) [1] ND 0.0034 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Chlordane [1] ND 0.023 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB 4,4'-DDD [2] 0.016 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 P-01 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09
12/29/09 10:58 JB 4,4'-DDE [1] 0.35 0.023 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:53 JB 4,4'-DDT [2] 2] 0.55 0.046 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:53 JB Dieldrin
[2] 0.41 0.046 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:53 JB Endosulfan I [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Endosulfan II [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Endosulfan sulfate [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Endrin [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09
12/29/09 10:58 JB Endrin ketone [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Heptachlor [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Heptachlor
epoxide [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Hexachlorobenzene [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Methoxychlor [1] ND 0.057
mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 10:58 JB Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 76.6 30-150 12/29/09 10:58 Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 72.3 30-150 12/29/09
10:58 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 71.4 30-150 12/29/09 10:58 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 73.0 30-150 12/29/09 10:58 Page 4 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-01 Field Sample #: BF-4 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:45 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Metals Analyses
(Total) Arsenic 38 2.7 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:02 KSH Lead 130 0.82 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:02 KSH Page 5 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-01 Field Sample #: BF-4 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:45 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Conventional
Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) % Solids 87.3 % Wt 1 SM 2540G 12/28/09 12/28/09 15:50 FWD Page 6 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-02 Field Sample #: BF-5 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:55 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Organochloride
Pesticides by GC/ECD Aldrin [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB alpha-BHC [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB beta-BHC [1]
ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB delta-BHC [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB gamma-BHC (Lindane) [1] ND 0.0034 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Chlordane [1] ND 0.023 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB 4,4'-DDD [2] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:12 JB 4,4'-DDE [1] 0.33 0.023 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:07 JB 4,4'-DDT [2] 0.29 0.046 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:07 JB Dieldrin [2] 0.32 0.046
mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:07 JB Endosulfan I [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Endosulfan II [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A
12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Endosulfan sulfate [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Endrin [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12
JB Endrin ketone [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Heptachlor [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Heptachlor epoxide [1]
ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Hexachlorobenzene [1] ND 0.0057 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Methoxychlor [1] ND 0.057 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:12 JB Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 72.3 30-150 12/29/09 11:12 Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 72.1 30-150 12/29/09 11:12
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 69.7 30-150 12/29/09 11:12 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 71.1 30-150 12/29/09 11:12 Page 7 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-02 Field Sample #: BF-5 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:55 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Metals Analyses
(Total) Arsenic 32 2.8 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:06 KSH Lead 85 0.83 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:06 KSH Page 8 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-02 Field Sample #: BF-5 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:55 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Conventional
Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) % Solids 87.4 % Wt 1 SM 2540G 12/28/09 12/28/09 15:50 FWD Page 9 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-03 Field Sample #: BF-6 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 13:05 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Organochloride
Pesticides by GC/ECD Aldrin [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB alpha-BHC [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB beta-BHC [1]
ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB delta-BHC [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB gamma-BHC (Lindane) [1] ND 0.0032 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Chlordane [1] ND 0.021 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB 4,4'-DDD [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:27 JB 4,4'-DDE [1] 0.0079 0.0043 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB 4,4'-DDT [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Dieldrin [2] 0.027
0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Endosulfan I [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Endosulfan II [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846
8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Endosulfan sulfate [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Endrin [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:27 JB Endrin ketone [1] ND 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Heptachlor [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Heptachlor epoxide
[1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Hexachlorobenzene [1] ND 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Methoxychlor [1] ND 0.053 mg/Kg
dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:27 JB Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 76.4 30-150 12/29/09 11:27 Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 76.6 30-150 12/29/09
11:27 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 73.9 30-150 12/29/09 11:27 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 75.6 30-150 12/29/09 11:27 Page 10 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-03 Field Sample #: BF-6 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 13:05 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Metals Analyses
(Total) Arsenic 22 2.7 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:11 KSH Lead 4.8 0.80 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:11 KSH Page 11 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-03 Field Sample #: BF-6 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled:
12/23/2009 13:05 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) % Solids
93.6 % Wt 1 SM 2540G 12/28/09 12/28/09 15:50 FWD Page 12 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-04 Field Sample #: BF-7 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 13:15 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Organochloride
Pesticides by GC/ECD Aldrin [1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB alpha-BHC [1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB beta-BHC [1]
ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB delta-BHC [1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB gamma-BHC (Lindane) [1] ND 0.0035 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Chlordane [1] ND 0.023 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB 4,4'-DDD [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:41 JB 4,4'-DDE [1] 0.17 0.023 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:22 JB 4,4'-DDT [2] 0.19 0.046 mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:22 JB Dieldrin [2] 0.26 0.046
mg/Kg dry 5 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 13:22 JB Endosulfan I [2] 0.0069 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Endosulfan II [1] 0.025 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846
8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Endosulfan sulfate [1] 0.050 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Endrin [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:41 JB Endrin ketone [1] ND 0.0092 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Heptachlor [1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Heptachlor epoxide
[1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Hexachlorobenzene [1] ND 0.0058 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Methoxychlor [1] ND 0.058 mg/Kg
dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:41 JB Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 74.1 30-150 12/29/09 11:41 Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 73.9 30-150 12/29/09
11:41 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 70.6 30-150 12/29/09 11:41 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 72.0 30-150 12/29/09 11:41 Page 13 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-04 Field Sample #: BF-7 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 13:15 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Metals Analyses
(Total) Arsenic 27 2.8 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:15 KSH Lead 36 0.85 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:15 KSH Page 14 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-04 Field Sample #: BF-7 0-1' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 13:15 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Conventional
Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) % Solids 86.7 % Wt 1 SM 2540G 12/28/09 12/28/09 15:50 FWD Page 15 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-05 Field Sample #: BF-3 10-12' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:30 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Organochloride
Pesticides by GC/ECD Aldrin [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB alpha-BHC [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB beta-BHC [1]
ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB delta-BHC [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB gamma-BHC (Lindane) [1] ND 0.0033 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Chlordane [1] ND 0.022 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB 4,4'-DDD [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09
11:56 JB 4,4'-DDE [1] ND 0.0044 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB 4,4'-DDT [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Dieldrin [1] ND 0.0088
mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Endosulfan I [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Endosulfan II [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A
12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Endosulfan sulfate [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Endrin [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56
JB Endrin ketone [1] ND 0.0088 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Heptachlor [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Heptachlor epoxide [1]
ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Hexachlorobenzene [1] ND 0.0055 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Methoxychlor [1] ND 0.055 mg/Kg dry
1 SW-846 8081A 12/28/09 12/29/09 11:56 JB Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag Decachlorobiphenyl [1] 74.6 30-150 12/29/09 11:56 Decachlorobiphenyl [2] 75.7 30-150 12/29/09 11:56
Tetrachloro-m-xylene [1] 71.3 30-150 12/29/09 11:56 Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2] 72.8 30-150 12/29/09 11:56 Page 16 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-05 Field Sample #: BF-3 10-12' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:30 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Metals Analyses
(Total) Arsenic ND 2.7 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:20 KSH Lead 3.9 0.81 mg/Kg dry 1 SW-846 6010B 12/28/09 12/29/09 12:20 KSH Page 17 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/24/2009 Project Location: Bean Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0659 Sample ID:
09L0659-05 Field Sample #: BF-3 10-12' Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 12/23/2009 12:30 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Conventional
Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) % Solids 90.9 % Wt 1 SM 2540G 12/28/09 12/28/09 15:50 FWD Page 18 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Sample Extraction Data Prep Method: % Solids-SM 2540G Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Date 09L0659-01
[BF-4 0-1'] B008827 12/28/09 09L0659-02 [BF-5 0-1'] B008827 12/28/09 09L0659-03 [BF-6 0-1'] B008827 12/28/09 09L0659-04 [BF-7 0-1'] B008827 12/28/09 09L0659-05 [BF-3 10-12'] B008827
12/28/09 Prep Method: SW-846 3050B-SW-846 6010B Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Initial [g] Final [mL] Date 09L0659-01 [BF-4 0-1'] B008848 1.0431 50 12/28/09 09L0659-02 [BF-5 0-1'] B008848
1.0386 50 12/28/09 09L0659-03 [BF-6 0-1'] B008848 1.0066 50 12/28/09 09L0659-04 [BF-7 0-1'] B008848 1.0136 50 12/28/09 09L0659-05 [BF-3 10-12'] B008848 1.0167 50 12/28/09 Prep Method:
SW-846 3546-SW-846 8081A Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Initial [g] Final [mL] Date 09L0659-01 [BF-4 0-1'] B008825 10 10 12/28/09 09L0659-02 [BF-5 0-1'] B008825 10 10 12/28/09 09L0659-03
[BF-6 0-1'] B008825 10 10 12/28/09 09L0659-04 [BF-7 0-1'] B008825 10 10 12/28/09 09L0659-05 [BF-3 10-12'] 12'] B008825 10 10 12/28/09 Page 19 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Organochloride Pesticides by GC/ECD -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008825 -SW-846 3546 Blank (B008825-BLK1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Aldrin ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet
Aldrin [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet alpha-BHC ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet alpha-BHC [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet beta-BHC ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet beta-BHC [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet delta-BHC ND 0.0050 mg/Kg
wet delta-BHC [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 0.0030 mg/Kg wet gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] ND 0.0030 mg/Kg wet Chlordane ND 0.020 mg/Kg wet Chlordane [2C] ND 0.020 mg/Kg
wet 4,4'-DDD ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 4,4'-DDD [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 4,4'-DDE ND 0.0040 mg/Kg wet 4,4'-DDE [2C] ND 0.0040 mg/Kg wet 4,4'-DDT ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 4,4'-DDT [2C] ND 0.0080
mg/Kg wet Dieldrin ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Dieldrin [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan I ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan I [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan II ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan
II [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan Sulfate ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endosulfan Sulfate [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin Aldehyde
ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin Aldehyde [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin Ketone ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Endrin Ketone [2C] ND 0.0080 mg/Kg wet Heptachlor ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Heptachlor [2C] ND
0.0050 mg/Kg wet Heptachlor Epoxide ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Hexachlorobenzene [2C] ND 0.0050 mg/Kg wet Methoxychlor
ND 0.050 mg/Kg wet Methoxychlor [2C] ND 0.050 mg/Kg wet Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.175 mg/Kg wet 0.200 87.3 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 0.176 mg/Kg wet 0.200 88.0
30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.166 mg/Kg wet 0.200 83.1 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 0.170 mg/Kg wet 0.200 85.2 30-150 Page 20 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Organochloride Pesticides by GC/ECD -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008825 -SW-846 3546 LCS (B008825-BS1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Aldrin 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet
0.0200 97.1 40-140 Aldrin [2C] 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 97.5 40-140 alpha-BHC 0.021 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 106 40-140 alpha-BHC [2C] 0.020 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 100 40-140 beta-BHC
0.020 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 100 40-140 beta-BHC [2C] 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 96.8 40-140 delta-BHC 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 94.7 40-140 delta-BHC [2C] 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg
wet 0.0200 93.4 40-140 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.020 0.0030 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 100 40-140 gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] 0.020 0.0030 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 101 40-140 4,4'-DDD 0.021 0.0080 mg/Kg wet
0.0200 106 40-140 4,4'-DDD [2C] 0.021 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 104 40-140 4,4'-DDE 0.021 0.0040 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 105 40-140 4,4'-DDE [2C] 0.020 0.0040 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 101 40-140 4,4'-DDT
0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 93.3 40-140 4,4'-DDT [2C] 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 90.2 40-140 Dieldrin 0.020 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 102 40-140 Dieldrin [2C] 0.020 0.0080 mg/Kg wet
0.0200 102 40-140 Endosulfan I 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 89.9 40-140 Endosulfan I [2C] 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 96.7 40-140 Endosulfan II 0.020 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 98.0
40-140 Endosulfan II [2C] 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 97.5 40-140 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 94.8 40-140 Endosulfan Sulfate [2C] 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200
97.0 40-140 Endrin 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 91.7 40-140 Endrin [2C] 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 88.6 40-140 Endrin Ketone 0.021 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 103 40-140 Endrin Ketone
[2C] 0.021 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 103 40-140 Heptachlor 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 95.7 40-140 Heptachlor [2C] 0.020 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 98.7 40-140 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.019
0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 96.6 40-140 Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 96.9 40-140 Hexachlorobenzene 0.021 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 105 40-140 Hexachlorobenzene [2C]
0.020 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 99.5 40-140 Methoxychlor 0.021 0.050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 104 40-140 Methoxychlor [2C] 0.020 0.050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 99.8 40-140 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl
0.187 mg/Kg wet 0.200 93.7 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 0.188 mg/Kg wet 0.200 93.9 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.176 mg/Kg wet 0.200 88.0 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylen
e [2C] 0.181 mg/Kg wet 0.200 90.7 30-150 LCS Dup (B008825-BSD1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Aldrin 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 88.1 40-140 9.68 30 Aldrin [2C] 0.018 0.0050
mg/Kg wet 0.0200 88.1 40-140 10.1 30 alpha-BHC 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 96.3 40-140 9.78 30 alpha-BHC [2C] 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 89.9 40-140 11.0 30 beta-BHC 0.018 0.0050
mg/Kg wet 0.0200 90.6 40-140 10.3 30 beta-BHC [2C] 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 87.9 40-140 9.70 30 delta-BHC BHC 0.017 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 84.3 40-140 11.6 30 delta-BHC [2C] 0.017
0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 83.7 40-140 11.0 30 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.018 0.0030 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 89.7 40-140 11.2 30 gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] 0.018 0.0030 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 90.3 40-140 10.8
30Page 21 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Organochloride Pesticides by GC/ECD -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008825 -SW-846 3546 LCS Dup (B008825-BSD1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 4,4'-DDD 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg
wet 0.0200 94.9 40-140 11.5 30 4,4'-DDD [2C] 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 92.3 40-140 12.0 30 4,4'-DDE 0.019 0.0040 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 93.3 40-140 11.6 30 4,4'-DDE [2C] 0.018 0.0040 mg/Kg
wet 0.0200 90.8 40-140 11.1 30 4,4'-DDT 0.017 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 82.6 40-140 12.1 30 4,4'-DDT [2C] 0.016 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 80.5 40-140 11.4 30 Dieldrin 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg
wet 0.0200 90.8 40-140 11.4 30 Dieldrin [2C] 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 90.6 40-140 11.4 30 Endosulfan I 0.016 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 80.7 40-140 10.8 30 Endosulfan I [2C] 0.017
0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 86.9 40-140 10.7 30 Endosulfan II 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 87.8 40-140 10.9 30 Endosulfan II [2C] 0.018 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 87.8 40-140 10.5 30 Endosulfan
Sulfate 0.017 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 85.1 40-140 10.8 30 Endosulfan Sulfate [2C] 0.017 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 86.8 40-140 11.2 30 Endrin 0.016 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 79.0 40-140 14.8
30 Endrin [2C] 0.015 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 76.9 40-140 14.2 30 Endrin Ketone 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 92.9 40-140 9.91 30 Endrin Ketone [2C] 0.019 0.0080 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 92.7
40-140 10.1 30 Heptachlor 0.017 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 86.0 40-140 10.7 30 Heptachlor [2C] 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 88.8 40-140 10.5 30 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.017 0.0050 mg/Kg wet
0.0200 86.8 40-140 10.8 30 Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] 0.017 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 87.4 40-140 10.4 30 Hexachlorobenzene 0.019 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 95.1 40-140 9.48 30 Hexachlorobenzene
[2C] 0.018 0.0050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 89.0 40-140 11.2 30 Methoxychlor 0.019 0.050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 93.1 40-140 10.8 30 Methoxychlor [2C] 0.018 0.050 mg/Kg wet 0.0200 89.0 40-140 11.4 30
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.166 mg/Kg wet 0.200 82.8 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 0.167 mg/Kg wet 0.200 83.4 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.158 mg/Kg wet 0.200
79.1 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 0.162 mg/Kg wet 0.200 80.8 30-150 Matrix Spike (B008825-MS1) Source: 09L0659-03 Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Aldrin 0.017 0.0053
mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 79.6 30-150 Aldrin [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.8 30-150 alpha-BHC 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.5 30-150 alpha-BHC [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry
0.0214 0.0 78.9 30-150 beta-BHC 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 79.5 30-150 beta-BHC [2C] 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 77.2 30-150 delta-BHC 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0
74.6 30-150 delta-BHC [2C] 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 74.6 30-150 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.017 0.0032 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 80.4 30-150 gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] 0.017 0.0032 mg/Kg
dry 0.0214 0.0 80.6 30-150 4,4'-DDD 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 85.5 30-150 4,4'-DDD [2C] 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 84.5 30-150 4,4'-DDE 0.027 0.0043 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0079
87.1 30-150 4,4'-DDE [2C] 0.026 0.0043 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0072 86.1 30-150 4,4'-DDT 0.020 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0036 75.1 30-150 4,4'-DDT [2C] 0.020 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0039
73.9 30-150 Dieldrin 0.043 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.027 77.3 30-150 Dieldrin [2C] 0.045 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.027 81.6 30-150 Endosulfan I 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 73.4
30-150 Endosulfan I [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 77.9 30-150 Page 22 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Organochloride Pesticides by GC/ECD -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008825 -SW-846 3546 Matrix Spike (B008825-MS1) Source: 09L0659-03 Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Endosulfan
II 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 77.9 30-150 Endosulfan II [2C] 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 77.4 30-150 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.6 30-150 Endosulfan
Sulfate [2C] 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 77.8 30-150 Endrin 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 79.0 30-150 Endrin [2C] 0.016 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 76.4 30-150 Endrin Ketone
0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.7 30-150 Endrin Ketone [2C] 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 81.2 30-150 Heptachlor 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 76.6 30-150 Heptachlor [2C]
0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.2 30-150 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.0 30-150 Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.2 30-150 Hexachlorobenzene
0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 85.2 30-150 Hexachlorobenzene [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 80.3 30-150 Methoxychlor 0.020 0.053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 92.2 30-150 Methoxychlor
[2C] 0.023 0.053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 106 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.158 mg/Kg dry 0.214 73.8 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 0.159 mg/Kg dry 0.214 74.3 30-150
Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.151 mg/Kg dry 0.214 70.6 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 0.154 mg/Kg dry 0.214 71.9 30-150 Matrix Spike Dup (B008825-MSD1) Source: 09L0659-03
Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Aldrin 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.3 30-150 4.52 30 Aldrin [2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.2 30-150 5.50 30 alpha-BHC 0.019 0.0053
mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 87.4 30-150 4.51 30 alpha-BHC [2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.8 30-150 5.97 30 beta-BHC 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.7 30-150 5.16 5.16 30 beta-BHC
[2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 81.9 30-150 5.86 30 delta-BHC 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 78.7 30-150 5.43 30 delta-BHC [2C] 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 79.4 30-150
6.16 30 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.018 0.0032 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 84.1 30-150 4.60 30 gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] 0.018 0.0032 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 85.3 30-150 5.65 30 4,4'-DDD 0.019 0.0085
mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 90.3 30-150 5.46 30 4,4'-DDD [2C] 0.019 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 89.2 30-150 5.48 30 4,4'-DDE 0.027 0.0043 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0079 91.1 30-150 3.25 30 4,4'-DDE
[2C] 0.026 0.0043 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0072 90.4 30-150 3.53 30 4,4'-DDT 0.021 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0036 81.1 30-150 6.30 30 4,4'-DDT [2C] 0.021 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0039 79.2
30-150 5.63 30 Dieldrin 0.045 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.027 85.5 30-150 3.95 30 Dieldrin [2C] 0.047 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.027 91.4 30-150 4.61 30 Endosulfan I 0.016 0.0053 mg/Kg
dry 0.0214 0.0 76.8 30-150 4.57 30 Endosulfan I [2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 82.3 30-150 5.46 30 Endosulfan II 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 82.3 30-150 5.44 30 Endosulfan
II [2C] 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 81.9 30-150 5.57 30 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 82.9 30-150 5.31 30 Endosulfan Sulfate [2C] 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry
0.0214 0.0 82.4 30-150 5.84 30 Endrin 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.5 30-150 5.65 30 Endrin [2C] 0.017 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 80.7 30-150 5.41 30 Endrin Ketone 0.019 0.0085
mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 87.8 30-150 4.70 30 Endrin Ketone [2C] 0.018 0.0085 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 86.0 30-150 5.65 30 Heptachlor 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 80.6 30-150 5.01 30 Heptachlor
[2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 83.0 30-150 5.91 30Page 23 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Organochloride Pesticides by GC/ECD -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008825 -SW-846 3546 Matrix Spike Dup (B008825-MSD1) Source: 09L0659-03 Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.017 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 81.6 30-150 4.54 30 Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 82.6 30-150 5.48 30 Hexachlorobenzene 0.019 0.0053
mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 88.9 30-150 4.26 30 Hexachlorobenzene [2C] 0.018 0.0053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 84.8 30-150 5.46 30 Methoxychlor 0.021 0.053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 97.7 30-150 5.77 30
Methoxychlor [2C] 0.023 0.053 mg/Kg dry 0.0214 0.0 105 30-150 0.213 30 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.175 mg/Kg dry 0.214 81.8 30-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 0.171 mg/Kg
dry 0.214 80.2 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 0.164 mg/Kg dry 0.214 76.6 30-150 Surrogate: Tetrachloro-m-xylene [2C] 0.168 mg/Kg dry 0.214 78.5 30-150 Page 24 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Metals Analyses (Total) -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008848 -SW-846 3050B Blank (B008848-BLK1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Arsenic ND 2.5 mg/Kg wet Lead ND 0.75
mg/Kg wet LCS (B008848-BS1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Arsenic 150 5.0 mg/Kg wet 158 95.0 81.6-118.4 Lead 159 1.5 mg/Kg wet 172 92.3 79.1-120.3 LCS (B008848-BS2) Prepared:
12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Lead 0.801 0.75 mg/Kg wet 0.750 107 79.1-120.3 LCS Dup (B008848-BSD1) Prepared: 12/28/09 Analyzed: 12/29/09 Arsenic 152 5.0 mg/Kg wet 158 95.7 81.6-118.4
0.875 30 Lead 160 1.5 mg/Kg wet 172 92.7 79.1-120.3 0.588 30Page 25 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 BREAKDOWN REPORT Lab Sample ID: S000231-PEM1 Analyzed: 12/29/2009 Column Number: 1 Analyte % Breakdown
4,4'-DDT [1] 4.13 Endrin [1] 12.84 Column Number: 2 Analyte % Breakdown 4,4'-DDT [2] 3.68 Endrin [2] 14.33 Page 26 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY * QC result is outside of established limits. † Wide recovery limits estabished
for difficult compound. ‡ Wide RPD limits estabished for difficult compound. # Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level Percent recoveries and relative percent differences
(RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded. Result was confirmed using a dissimilar column. Relative percent difference between
the two results was >40%. The higher result was reported. P-01 Page 27 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Analyte Certifications CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report SW-846 6010B in Soil
Arsenic CT,NH,NY Lead CT,NH,NY,AIHA SW-846 8081A in Soil Aldrin CT,NH,NY Aldrin [2C] CT,NH,NY alpha-BHC CT,NH,NY alpha-BHC [2C] CT,NH,NY beta-BHC CT,NH,NY beta-BHC [2C] CT,NH,NY delta-BHC
CT,NH,NY delta-BHC [2C] CT,NH,NY gamma-BHC (Lindane) CT,NH,NY gamma-BHC (Lindane) [2C] CT,NH,NY Chlordane CT,NH,NY Chlordane [2C] CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDD CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDD [2C] CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDE
CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDE [2C] CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDT CT,NH,NY 4,4'-DDT [2C] CT,NH,NY Dieldrin CT,NH,NY Dieldrin [2C] CT,NH,NY Endosulfan I CT,NH,NY Endosulfan I [2C] CT,NH,NY Endosulfan II CT,NH,NY
Endosulfan II [2C] CT,NH,NY Endosulfan Sulfate CT,NH,NY Endosulfan Sulfate [2C] CT,NH,NY Endrin CT,NH,NY Endrin [2C] CT,NH,NY Heptachlor CT,NH,NY Heptachlor [2C] CT,NH,NY Heptachlor
Epoxide CT,NH,NY Heptachlor Epoxide [2C] CT,NH,NY Hexachlorobenzene CT,NH,NY Hexachlorobenzene [2C] CT,NH,NY Methoxychlor CT,NH,NY Methoxychlor [2C] CT,NH,NY Page 28 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 The CON-TEST Environmental Laboratory operates under the following certifications and accreditations:
Code Description Number Expires AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association 100033 01/1/2012 MA Massachusetts DEP M-MA100 06/30/2010 CT Connecticut Department of Publilc Health PH-0567
09/30/2011 NY New York State Department of Health 10899 NELAP 04/1/2010 NH New Hampshire Environmental Lab 2516 NELAP 02/5/2010 RI Rhode Island Department of Health LAO00112 12/30/2010
NC North Carolina Div. of Water Quality 652 12/31/2009 NJ New Jersey DEP MA007 NELAP 06/30/2010 FL Florida Department of Health E871027 NELAP 06/30/2010 VT Vermont Department of Health
Lead Laboratory LL015036 07/30/2010 WA State of Washington Department of Ecology C2065 03/23/2010 Page 29 of 32
Page 30 of 32
Page 31 of 32
MADEP MCP Analytical Method Report Certification Form Laboratory Name: Con-Test Analytical Laboratory Project #: Project Location: This Form provides certifications for the following
data set: [list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s)] 09L0659 09L0659-01 thru 09L0659-058260B ( ) 8151A ( ) 8330 ( ) 6010B (X) 7470A/1A ( ) 8270C ( ) 8081A (X) VPH ( ) 6020 ( ) 9014M² ( )
8082 ( ) 8021B ( ) EPH ( ) 7000 S³ ( ) 7196A ( ) MCP SW-846 Methods Used As specified in MADEP Compendium of Analytical Methods. (check all that apply) 1 List Release Tracking Number
(RTN), if known 2 M --SW-846 Method 9014 or MADEP Physiologically Available Cyanide (PAC) Method 3 S --SW-846 Methods 7000 Series List individual method and analyte Bean Sample Matrices:
MADEP RTN1¹: Soil An affirmative response to questions A, B, C and D is required for “Presumptive Certainty” status A Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent
with that ü Yes No¹ described on the Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set? B Were all QA/QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytical method(s) ü Yes No¹ included
in this report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards or guidelines? C Does the data included
in this report meet all the analytical requirements for ü Yes No¹ “Presumptive Certainty”, as described in Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the MADEP document CAM VII A, “Quality
Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data? D VPH and EPH Methods only: Was the VPH or EPH Method conducted without Yes No¹ significant
modifications (see Section 11.3 of respective Methods) E Were all analytical QC performance standards and recommendations for the specified methods achieved? Yes ü No¹ A response to
questions E and F below is required for “Presumptive Certainty” status Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported? F Yes ü No¹ I, the undersigned,
attest attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical
report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ¹All Negative responses must be addressed in an attached Environmental Laboratory case narrative. Signature:
Printed Name: Position: Date: Laboratory Director Michael A. Erickson 01/04/10 CAM VII A, rev. 3.2 April 2004 Page 32 of 32
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 January 7, 2010 Valerie Tillinghast OTO Associates 293 Bridge St. Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103
Project Location: Beam Client Job Number: Project Number: 285-14-01 Laboratory Work Order Number: 09L0724 Enclosed are results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on December
30, 2009. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Susan M. Burney Project Manager Page 1 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY OTO Associates 1/7/2010 293 Bridge St. Suite 500 Springfield, MA 01103 ATTN: Valerie
Tillinghast 285-14-01 09L0724 The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON-TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report. PROJECT LOCATION: PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: REPORT DATE: WORK ORDER NUMBER: FIELD SAMPLE # LAB ID: MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
TEST SUB LAB Beam BF-2 09L0724-01 Ground Water MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 SW-846 8270C Page 2 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives
unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report. SW-846 8270C Qualifications: Laboratory fortified blank duplicate RPD is outside of control limits. Reduced precision is anticipated
for any reported value for this compound. Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified: Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene 09L0724-01[BF-2], B008989-BLK1, B008989-BS1,
B008989-BSD1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 No significant modifications were made to the method. All VPH samples were received preserved properly at pH <2 in the proper containers as specified on
the chain-of-custody form unless specified in this narrative. SW-846 8270C Laboratory control sample recoveries for required MCP Data Enhancement 8270 compounds were all within control
limits specified by the method, 40-140% for base/neutrals and 30-130% for acids except for “difficult analytes” listed below and/or otherwise listed in this narrative. Difficult analytes
for water LCS – limits between 10 and 150% depending on the compound (see QC summary report for limits): dimethylphthalate, bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether, 4-nitrophenol, and phenol. Duplicate
laboratory fortified blank RPDs were all less than or equal to 20% for water or 30% for soil except for ”difficult analytes” where RPDs of 50% are used and/or otherwise listed below
or elsewhere in this narrative. Difficult analytes for water RPDs: aniline, benzo(a,h)anthracene, dimethylphthalte, hexachloroethane, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol,
2,4,6-trichlorophenol, and pentachlorophenol. The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to the Con-Test Analytical Laboratory for testing. I certify that the
analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed in this document, and that
that based upon my inquiry of those individuuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
accurate and complete. Christopher J. Hall Project Chemist Supervisor Page 3 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/30/2009 Project Location: Beam Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0724 Sample ID:
09L0724-01 Field Sample #: BF-2 Sample Matrix: Ground Water Sampled: 12/29/2009 09:00 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Semivolatile
Organic Compounds by GC/MS Acenaphthene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Acenaphthylene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Acetophenone ND 10 μg/L 1
SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Aniline ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Anthracene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Benzo(a)anthracene ND 5.0
μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Benzo(a)pyrene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 R-05 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53
BGL Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 R-05 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 R-05 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10
1/5/10 11:53 BGL Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 4-Bromophenylphenylether ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Butylbenzylphthalate
ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 4-Chloroaniline ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53
BGL 2-Chlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Chrysene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 5.4 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10
1/5/10 11:53 BGL Dibenzofuran ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Di-n-butylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L
1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 3,3-Dichlorobenzid
ine ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Diethylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53
BGL 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Dimethylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C
1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Di-n-octylphthalate
ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Fluoranthene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10
1/5/10 11:53 BGL Fluorene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Hexachlorobenzene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Hexachlorobutadiene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846
8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Hexachloroethane ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Isophorone
ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Page 4 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/30/2009 Project Location: Beam Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0724 Sample ID:
09L0724-01 Field Sample #: BF-2 Sample Matrix: Ground Water Sampled: 12/29/2009 09:00 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Semivolatile
Organic Compounds by GC/MS 2-Methylphenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 3/4-Methylphenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Naphthalene ND 5.0 μg/L
1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Nitrobenzene ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2-Nitrophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 4-Nitrophenol ND
10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Pentachlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Phenanthrene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Phenol
ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Pyrene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:11:53 BGL 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits
Flag 2-Fluorophenol 36.0 15-110 1/5/10 11:53 Phenol-d6 21.9 15-110 1/5/10 11:53 Nitrobenzene-d5 57.9 30-130 1/5/10 11:53 2-Fluorobiphenyl 53.6 30-130 1/5/10 11:53 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
83.0 15-110 1/5/10 11:53 Terphenyl-d14 69.6 30-130 1/5/10 11:53 Page 5 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/30/2009 Project Location: Beam Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0724 Sample ID:
09L0724-01 Field Sample #: BF-2 Sample Matrix: Ground Water Sampled: 12/29/2009 09:00 Analyte Results Units Response RT DF Method Tentatively Identified Compounds -Semivolatile Compounds
(ESTIMATED VALUES REPORTED) Date Analyzed Analyst Date/Time CAS # Prepared No TICs Found 0.0 μg/L 1 SW-846 8270C 1/4/10 1/5/10 11:53 BGL Page 6 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 12/30/2009 Project Location: Beam Sample Description: Work Order: 09L0724 Sample ID:
09L0724-01 Field Sample #: BF-2 Sample Matrix: Ground Water Sampled: 12/29/2009 09:00 Analyte Results RL Dilution Flag Analyzed Analyst Date/Time Units Date Method Prepared Petroleum
Hydrocarbons Analyses -VPH Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH C5-C8 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH
Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH C9-C12 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH C9-C10 Aromatics ND 100 μg/L
1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Benzene ND 1.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Methyl tert-Butyl
Ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Naphthalene ND 10 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Toluene ND 1.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10
12:59 EEH m+p Xylene ND 2.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH o-Xylene ND 1.0 μg/L 1 MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 1/5/10 1/5/10 12:59 EEH Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) 91.7 70-130 1/5/10 12:59 2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) 93.2 70-130 1/5/10 12:59 Page 7 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Sample Extraction Data Prep Method: MA VPH-MADEP-VPH-04-1.1 Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Initial [mL]
Final [mL] Date 09L0724-01 [BF-2] B009028 5 5 01/05/10 Prep Method: SW-846 3510C-SW-846 8270C Lab Number [Field ID] Batch Initial [mL] Final [mL] Date 09L0724-01 [BF-2] B008989 1000
1 01/04/10 Page 8 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008989 -SW-846 3510C Blank (B008989-BLK1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 Acenaphthene ND 5.0 μg/L
Acenaphthylene ND 5.0 μg/L Acetophenone ND 10 μg/L Aniline ND 5.0 μg/L Anthracene ND 5.0 μg/L Benzo(a)anthracene ND 5.0 μg/L Benzo(a)pyrene ND 5.0 μg/L Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 5.0 μg/L
R-05 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 5.0 μg/L R-05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 5.0 μg/L R-05 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 10 μg/L Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 10 μg/L Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
ND 10 μg/L Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 10 μg/L 4-Bromophenylphenylether ND 10 μg/L Butylbenzylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 4-Chloroaniline ND 10 μg/L 2-Chloronaphthalene ND 10 μg/L 2-Chlorophenol
ND 10 μg/L Chrysene ND 5.0 μg/L Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 5.4 μg/L Dibenzofuran ND 5.0 μg/L Di-n-butylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND 10 μg/L 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L Diethylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 10 μg/L Dimethylphthalate ND 10 μg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 10 μg/L 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 10 μg/L 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 10 μg/L Di-n-octylphthalate ND 10 μg/L 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) ND 10 μg/L Fluoranthene
ND 5.0 μg/L Fluorene ND 5.0 μg/L Hexachlorobenzene ND 10 μg/L Hexachlorobutadiene ND 10 μg/L Hexachloroethane ND 10 μg/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 5.0 μg/L Isophorone ND 10 μg/L 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND 5.0 μg/L 2-Methylphenol ND 10 μg/L 3/4-Methylphenol ND 10 μg/L Naphthalene ND 5.0 μg/L Nitrobenzene ND 10 μg/L 2-Nitrophenol ND 10 μg/L 4-Nitrophenol ND 10 μg/L Pentachlorophenol
ND 10 μg/L Phenanthrene ND 5.0 μg/L Page 9 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008989 -SW-846 3510C Blank (B008989-BLK1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 Phenol ND 10 μg/L Pyrene
ND 5.0 μg/L 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 μg/L 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 10 μg/L Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 142 μg/L 200 70.9 15-110 Surrogate: Phenol-d6
128 μg/L 200 64.2 15-110 Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 61.6 μg/L 100 61.6 30-130 Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 60.3 μg/L 100 60.3 30-130 Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 125 μg/L 200 62.5
15-110 Surrogate: Terphenyl-d14 68.6 μg/L 100 68.6 30-130 LCS (B008989-BS1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 Acenaphthene 47.6 5.0 μg/L 100 47.6 40-140 Acenaphthylene 43.2 5.0 μg/L
100 43.2 40-140 Acetophenone 28.6 10 μg/L 50.0 57.2 40-140 Aniline 58.9 5.0 μg/L 100 58.9 40-140 Anthracene 49.0 5.0 μg/L 100 49.0 40-140 Benzo(a)anthracene 57.7 5.0 μg/L 100 57.7 40-140
Benzo(a)pyrene 80.0 5.0 μg/L 100 80.0 40-140 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 75.2 5.0 μg/L 100 75.2 40-140 R-05 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 84.4 5.0 μg/L 100 84.4 40-140 R-05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 75.0
5.0 μg/L 100 75.0 40-140 R-05 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 63.6 10 μg/L 100 63.6 40-140 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 65.9 10 μg/L 100 65.9 40-140 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 52.0 10 μg/L 100
52.0 40-140 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 71.4 10 μg/L 100 71.4 40-140 4-Bromophenylphenylether 69.9 10 μg/L 100 69.9 40-140 Butylbenzylphthalate 71.1 10 μg/L 100 71.1 40-140 4-Chloroaniline
40.3 10 μg/L 100 40.3 40-140 2-Chloronaphthalene 51.1 10 μg/L 100 51.1 40-140 2-Chlorophenol 59.4 10 μg/L 100 59.4 30-130 Chrysene 59.6 5.0 μg/L 100 59.6 40-140 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
89.8 5.4 μg/L 100 89.8 40-140 Dibenzofuran 59.6 5.0 μg/L 100 59.6 40-140 Di-n-butylphthalate 59.9 10 μg/L 100 59.9 40-140 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 59.1 5.0 μg/L 100 59.1 40-140 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
57.0 5.0 μg/L 100 57.0 40-140 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 57.7 5.0 μg/L 100 57.7 40-140 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine 50.3 10 μg/L 100 50.3 40-140 2,4-Dichlorophenol 67.0 10 μg/L 100 67.0 30-130 Diethylphthalate
58.4 10 μg/L 100 58.4 40-140 2,4-Dimethylphenol 65.5 10 μg/L 100 65.5 30-130 Dimethylphthalate 61.8 10 μg/L 100 61.8 40-140 2,4-Dinitrophenol 57.9 10 μg/L 100 57.9 30-130 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
62.9 10 μg/L 100 62.9 40-140 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 52.5 10 μg/L 100 52.5 40-140 Di-n-octylphthalate 92.9 10 μg/L 100 92.9 40-140 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) 67.4 10 μg/L 100 67.4
40-140 Fluoranthene 47.2 5.0 μg/L 100 47.2 40-140 Fluorene 45.7 5.0 μg/L 100 45.7 40-140 Hexachlorobenzene 70.9 10 μg/L 100 70.9 40-140 Page 10 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008989 -SW-846 3510C LCS (B008989-BS1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 Hexachlorobutadiene 69.1
10 μg/L 100 69.1 40-140 Hexachloroethane 57.3 10 μg/L 100 57.3 40-140 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 82.1 5.0 μg/L 100 82.1 40-140 Isophorone 69.8 10 μg/L 100 69.8 40-140 2-Methylnaphthalene
56.6 5.0 μg/L 100 56.6 40-140 2-Methylphenol 60.8 10 μg/L 100 60.8 30-130 3/4-Methylphenol 58.0 10 μg/L 100 58.0 30-130 Naphthalene 48.2 5.0 μg/L 100 48.2 40-140 Nitrobenzene 65.3 10
μg/L 100 65.3 40-140 2-Nitrophenol 66.6 10 μg/L 100 66.6 30-130 4-Nitrophenol 47.3 10 μg/L 100 47.3 10-130 † Pentachlorophenol 57.5 10 μg/L 100 57.5 30-130 Phenanthrene 50.6 5.0 μg/L
100 50.6 40-140 Phenol 52.6 10 μg/L 100 52.6 20-130 † Pyrene 53.0 5.0 μg/L 100 53.0 40-140 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 67.3 5.0 μg/L 100 67.3 40-140 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 69.8 10 μg/L 100
69.8 30-130 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 65.9 10 μg/L 100 65.9 30-130 Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 132 μg/L 200 65.8 15-110 Surrogate: Phenol-d6 109 μg/L 200 54.5 15-110 Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5
64.2 μg/L 100 64.2 30-130 Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 59.0 μg/L 100 59.0 30-130 Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 146 μg/L 200 73.0 15-110 Surrogate: Terphenyl-d14 70.8 μg/L 100 70.8 30-130
LCS Dup (B008989-BSD1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 Acenaphthene 48.8 5.0 μg/L 100 48.8 40-140 2.62 20 Acenaphthylene 43.7 5.0 μg/L 100 43.7 40-140 1.17 20 Acetophenone 30.6
10 μg/L 50.0 61.1 40-140 6.73 20 Aniline 61.3 5.0 μg/L 100 61.3 40-140 4.04 50 ‡ Anthracene 48.3 5.0 μg/L 100 48.3 40-140 1.46 20 Benzo(a)anthracene 61.8 5.0 μg/L 100 61.8 40-140 6.87
20 Benzo(a)pyrene 82.0 5.0 μg/L 100 82.0 40-140 2.56 20 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 92.3 5.0 μg/L 100 92.3 40-140 20.4 * 20 R-05 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 68.8 5.0 μg/L 100 68.8 40-140 20.3 * 20
R-05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 61.3 5.0 μg/L 100 61.3 40-140 20.1 * 20 R-05 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 66.8 10 μg/L 100 66.8 40-140 4.93 20 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 70.4 10 μg/L 100 70.4 40-140
6.61 20 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 54.8 10 μg/L 100 54.8 40-140 5.15 20 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 71.0 10 μg/L 100 71.0 40-140 0.632 20 4-Bromophenylphenylether 67.4 10 μg/L 100 67.4
40-140 3.64 20 Butylbenzylphthalate 73.1 10 μg/L 100 73.1 40-140 2.82 20 4-Chloroaniline 47.8 10 μg/L 100 47.8 40-140 16.9 20 2-Chloronaphthalene 50.8 10 μg/L 100 50.8 40-140 0.609 20
2-Chlorophenol 62.6 10 μg/L 100 62.6 30-130 5.29 20 Chrysene 57.9 5.0 μg/L 100 57.9 40-140 2.74 20 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 83.8 5.4 μg/L 100 83.8 40-140 6.98 20 Dibenzofuran 61.5 5.0 μg/L
100 61.5 40-140 3.15 20 Di-n-butylphthalate 63.4 10 μg/L 100 63.4 40-140 5.63 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 62.5 5.0 μg/L 100 62.5 40-140 5.58 20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 60.4 5.0 μg/L 100 60.4
40-140 5.91 20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 60.7 5.0 μg/L 100 60.7 40-140 5.10 20Page 11 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B008989 -SW-846 3510C LCS Dup (B008989-BSD1) Prepared: 01/04/10 Analyzed: 01/05/10 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
51.9 10 μg/L 100 51.9 40-140 3.05 20 2,4-Dichlorophenol 69.4 10 μg/L 100 69.4 30-130 3.46 20 Diethylphthalate 62.4 10 μg/L 100 62.4 40-140 6.56 20 2,4-Dimethylphenol 69.5 10 μg/L 100
69.5 30-130 5.91 20 Dimethylphthalate 67.0 10 μg/L 100 67.0 40-140 8.05 50 ‡ 2,4-Dinitrophenol 74.7 10 μg/L 100 74.7 30-130 25.3 50 ‡ 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 64.8 10 μg/L 100 64.8 40-140
2.94 20 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 51.8 10 μg/L 100 51.8 40-140 1.32 20 Di-n-octylphthalate 91.5 10 μg/L 100 91.5 40-140 1.54 20 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) 63.4 10 μg/L 100 63.4 40-140
6.13 20 Fluoranthene 51.4 5.0 μg/L 100 51.4 40-140 8.60 20 Fluorene 48.0 5.0 μg/L 100 48.0 40-140 4.97 20 Hexachlorobenzene 70.3 10 μg/L 100 70.3 40-140 0.963 20 Hexachlorobutadiene
70.2 10 μg/L 100 70.2 40-140 1.59 20 Hexachloroethane 60.1 10 μg/L 100 60.1 40-140 4.77 50 ‡ Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 79.8 5.0 μg/L 100 79.8 40-140 2.80 50 ‡ Isophorone 72.5 10 μg/L 100
72.5 40-140 3.78 20 2-Methylnaphthalene 57.9 5.0 μg/L 100 57.9 40-140 2.22 20 2-Methylphenol 64.2 10 μg/L 100 64.2 30-130 5.38 20 3/4-Methylphenol 64.0 10 μg/L 100 64.0 30-130 9.95 20
Naphthalene 50.1 5.0 μg/L 100 50.1 40-140 3.97 20 Nitrobenzene 67.8 10 μg/L 100 67.8 40-140 3.67 20 2-Nitrophenol 70.1 10 μg/L 100 70.1 30-130 5.18 20 4-Nitrophenol 61.3 10 μg/L 100
61.3 10-130 25.8 50 † ‡ Pentachlorophenol 62.3 10 μg/L 100 62.3 30-130 7.91 50 ‡ Phenanthrene 51.0 5.0 μg/L 100 51.0 40-140 0.709 20 Phenol 55.0 10 μg/L 100 55.0 20-130 4.54 20 † Pyrene
53.0 5.0 μg/L 100 53.0 40-140 0.0377 20 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 69.0 5.0 μg/L 100 69.0 40-140 2.54 20 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 74.6 10 μg/L 100 74.6 30-130 6.77 20 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
67.9 10 μg/L 100 67.9 30-30-130 2.93 50 ‡ Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 138 μg/L 200 68.9 15-110 Surrogate: Phenol-d6 115 μg/L 200 57.7 15-110 Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 67.3 μg/L 100 67.3
30-130 Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 58.5 μg/L 100 58.5 30-130 Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 171 μg/L 200 85.5 15-110 Surrogate: Terphenyl-d14 72.3 μg/L 100 72.3 30-130 Page 12 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses -VPH -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B009028 -MA VPH Blank (B009028-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 01/05/10 Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L
C5-C8 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L C9-C12 Aliphatics ND 100 μg/L C9-C10 Aromatics ND 100 μg/L Benzene ND 1.0 μg/L Butylcyclohexane ND 1.0 μg/L Decane
ND 1.0 μg/L Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 μg/L Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 1.0 μg/L 2-Methylpentane ND 1.0 μg/L Naphthalene ND 10 μg/L Nonane ND 1.0 μg/L Pentane ND 1.0 μg/L Toluene ND 1.0
μg/L 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.0 μg/L 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ND 1.0 μg/L m+p Xylene ND 2.0 μg/L o-Xylene ND 1.0 μg/L Surrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) 47.9 μg/L 40.0 120 70-130 Surrogate:
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) 48.3 μg/L 40.0 121 70-130 LCS (B009028-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 01/05/10 Benzene 110 1.0 μg/L 100 110 70-130 Butylcyclohexane 92.2 1.0 μg/L 100 92.2 70-130
Decane 105 1.0 μg/L 100 105 70-130 Ethylbenzene 109 1.0 μg/L 100 109 70-130 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 116 1.0 μg/L 100 116 70-130 2-Methylpentane 122 1.0 μg/L 100 122 70-130 Naphthalene
129 10 μg/L 100 129 70-130 Nonane 91.1 1.0 μg/L 100 91.1 30-130 Pentane 124 1.0 μg/L 100 124 70-130 Toluene 109 1.0 μg/L 100 109 70-130 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 110 1.0 μg/L 100 110 70-130
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 117 1.0 μg/L 100 117 70-130 m+p Xylene 218 2.0 μg/L 200 109 70-130 o-Xylene 110 1.0 μg/L 100 110 70-130 Surrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) 49.5 μg/L 40.0 124
70-130 Surrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) 49.7 μg/L 40.0 124 70-130 LCS Dup (B009028-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 01/05/10 Benzene 107 1.0 μg/L 100 107 70-130 2.64 25 Butylcyclohexane
90.5 1.0 μg/L 100 90.5 70-130 1.78 25 Decane 107 1.0 μg/L 100 107 70-130 1.87 25 Ethylbenzene 106 1.0 μg/L 100 106 70-130 2.41 25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 111 1.0 μg/L 100 111
70-130 4.10 25 2-Methylpentane 118 1.0 μg/L 100 118 70-130 3.16 25 Naphthalene 106 10 μg/L 100 106 70-130 19.5 25 Nonane 90.0 1.0 μg/L 100 90.0 30-130 1.28 25 Pentane 117 1.0 μg/L 100
117 70-130 5.98 25 Toluene 106 1.0 μg/L 100 106 70-130 2.95 25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 106 1.0 μg/L 100 106 70-130 3.58 25Page 13 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Analyte Limit Notes
Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses -VPH -Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B009028 -MA VPH LCS Dup (B009028-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 01/05/10 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 111 1.0 μg/L 100
111 70-130 5.30 25 m+p Xylene 213 2.0 μg/L 200 107 70-130 2.31 25 o-Xylene 108 1.0 μg/L 100 108 70-130 2.36 25 Surrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) 45.2 μg/L 40.0 113 70-130 Surrogate:
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) 40.5 μg/L 40.0 101 70-130 Page 14 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY * QC result is outside of established limits. † Wide recovery limits estabished
for difficult compound. ‡ Wide RPD limits estabished for difficult compound. # Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level Percent recoveries and relative percent differences
(RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded. Laboratory fortified blank duplicate RPD is outside of control limits. Reduced precision
is anticipated for any reported value for this compound. R-05 Page 15 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Analyte Certifications CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
in Water Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics CT,NC,WA C5-C8 Aliphatics CT,NC,WA Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics CT,NC,WA C9-C12 Aliphatics CT,NC,WA C9-C10 Aromatics CT,NC,WA Benzene CT,NC,WA Ethylbenzene
CT,NC,WA Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) CT,NC,WA Naphthalene CT,NC,WA Toluene CT,NC,WA o-Xylene CT,NC,WA SW-846 8270C in Water Acenaphthene CT,NY,NH,RI Acenaphthylene CT,NY,NH,RI Aniline
CT,NY Anthracene CT,NY,NH,RI Benzo(a)anthracene CT,NY,NH,RI Benzo(a)pyrene CT,NY,NH,RI Benzo(b)fluoranthene CT,NY,NH,RI Benzo(g,h,i)perylene CT,NY,NH,RI Benzo(k)fluoranthene CT,NY,NH,RI
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane CT,NY,NH,RI Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether CT,NY,NH,RI Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether CT,NY,NH,RI Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate CT,NY,NH,RI 4-Bromophenylphenylether CT,NY,NH,RI
Butylbenzylphthalate CT,NY,NH,RI 4-Chloroaniline CT,NY,NH 2-Chloronaphthalene CT,NY,NY,NH,RI 2-Chlorophenol CT,NY,NH,RI Chrysene CT,NY,NH,RI Dibenz(a,h)anthracene CT,NY,NH,RI Dibenzofuran
CT,NY,NH Di-n-butylphthalate CT,NY,NH,RI 1,2-Dichlorobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI 1,3-Dichlorobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI 1,4-Dichlorobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine CT,NY,NH,RI 2,4-Dichlorophenol
CT,NY,NH,RI Diethylphthalate CT,NY,NH,RI 2,4-Dimethylphenol CT,NY,NH,RI Dimethylphthalate CT,NY,NH,RI 2,4-Dinitrophenol CT,NY,NH,RI 2,4-Dinitrotoluene CT,NY,NH,RI 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
CT,NY,NH,RI Di-n-octylphthalate CT,NY,NH,RI Page 16 of 20
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Analyte Certifications CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report SW-846 8270C in Water
Fluoranthene CT,NY,NH,RI Fluorene NY,NH,RI Hexachlorobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI Hexachlorobutadiene CT,NY,NH,RI Hexachloroethane CT,NY,NH,RI Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene CT,NY,NH,RI Isophorone CT,NY,NH,RI
2-Methylnaphthalene CT,NY,NH 2-Methylphenol CT,NY,NH 3/4-Methylphenol CT,NY,NH Naphthalene CT,NY,NH,RI Nitrobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI 2-Nitrophenol CT,NY,NH,RI 4-Nitrophenol CT,NY,NH,RI Pentachlorophenol
CT,NY,NH,RI Phenanthrene CT,NY,NH,RI Phenol CT,NY,NH,RI Pyrene CT,NY,NH,RI 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene CT,NY,NH,RI 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol CT,NY,NH 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol CT,NY,NH,RI The CON-TEST
Environmental Laboratory operates under the following certifications and accreditations: Code Description Number Expires AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association 100033 01/1/2012
MA Massachusetts DEP M-MA100 06/30/2010 CT Connecticut Department of Publilc Health PH-0567 09/30/2011 NY New York State Department of Health 10899 NELAP 04/1/2010 NH New Hampshire Environmental
Lab 2516 NELAP 02/5/2010 RI Rhode Island Department of Health LAO00112 12/30/2010 NC North Carolina Div. of Water Quality 652 12/31/2010 NJ New Jersey DEP MA007 NELAP 06/30/2010 FL Florida
Department of Health E871027 NELAP 06/30/2010 VT Vermont Department of Health Lead Laboratory LL015036 07/30/2010 WA State of Washington Department of Ecology C2065 03/23/2010 Page 17
of 20
Page 18 of 20
Page 19 of 20
MADEP MCP Analytical Method Report Certification Form Laboratory Name: Con-Test Analytical Laboratory Project #: Project Location: This Form provides certifications for the following
data set: [list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s)] 09L0724 09L0724-01 8260B ( ) 8151A ( ) 8330 ( ) 6010B ( ) 7470A/1A ( ) 8270C (X) 8081A ( ) VPH (X) 6020 ( ) 9014M² ( ) 8082 ( ) 8021B
( ) EPH ( ) 7000 S³ ( ) 7196A ( ) MCP SW-846 Methods Used As specified in MADEP Compendium of Analytical Methods. (check all that apply) 1 List Release Tracking Number (RTN), if known
2 M --SW-846 Method 9014 or MADEP Physiologically Available Cyanide (PAC) Method 3 S --SW-846 Methods 7000 Series List individual method and analyte Beam Sample Matrices: MADEP RTN1¹:
Water An affirmative response to questions A, B, C and D is required for “Presumptive Certainty” status A Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with that
ü Yes No¹ described on the Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set? B Were all QA/QC procedures procedures required for the specified analytical method(s) ü Yes No¹ included
in this report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards or guidelines? C Does the data included
in this report meet all the analytical requirements for ü Yes No¹ “Presumptive Certainty”, as described in Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the MADEP document CAM VII A, “Quality
Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data? D VPH and EPH Methods only: Was the VPH or EPH Method conducted without ü Yes No¹ significant
modifications (see Section 11.3 of respective Methods) E Were all analytical QC performance standards and recommendations for the specified methods achieved? Yes ü No¹ A response to
questions E and F below is required for “Presumptive Certainty” status Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported? F ü Yes No¹ I, the undersigned,
attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained
in this analytical report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. ¹All Negative responses must be addressed in an attached Environmental Laboratory case narrative.
Signature: Printed Name: Position: Date: Project Chemist Supervisor Christopher J. Hall 01/07/10 CAM VII A, rev. 3.2 April 2004 Page 20 of 20
APPENDIX H QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S)
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] ValerieD. Tillinghast, LSP SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER tillinghast@oto-env.com phone: 413-788-6222 fax: 413-788-8830 www.oto-env.com AREAS
OF EXPERTISE Risk Assessment Data Validation /Analytical Quality Assurance Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Compliance PROFILE Valerie Tillinghast is an environmental chemist with
more than 15 years experience on projects ranging from initial site investigations to Superfund sites. Valerie's work focuses on data usability issues and human health risk characterizations.
In this capacity, she provides data validation services, statistical valuations of data scattering and trends, and fate and transport modeling to estimate exposure point concentrations.
Her experience with laboratory and onsite analysis gives her insight into data quality and usability. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Millbury Perchlorate Site Millbury, Massachusetts, ongoing Conducted
MCP investigations on groundwater and surface water at a large construction site where perchlorate had seeped into public drinking water supply. Perchlorate is an emerging contaminant
that has only recently been assigned regulatory limits by MassDEP and EPA, thus making Val’s expertise invaluable. Monsanto Company Chemical Plant Closure Everett, Massachusetts, onoing
Provided a range of MCP support services for a complex, 80-acre former chemical manufacturing site, including risk assessments, quarterly groundwater monitoring, preparation of plans
for public involvement meetings, on-site emission testing, removal actions and MCP reports. Nathan Bill Park Brownfields Site Springfield, Massachusetts, ongoing Prepared a Brownfields
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for EPA approval. This project was a high-visibility public park for which rapid action was desirable. The QAPP was prepared by OTO and EPA was
approved within a few weeks, allowing remedial response actions to begin. Former Hingham Shipyard Hingham, Massachusetts, ongoing Conducted MCP investigations and soil gas surveys at
a contaminated shipyard being redeveloped for mixed commercial and residential use. Used Method 3 Risk Characterization and implemented an AUL to achieve a Response Action Outcome and
ensure safe conditions for future users of the property. REGISTRATIONS and AFFILIATIONS Licensed Site Professional (LSP), Massachusetts Licensed Site Professional Association (LSPA),
Full Member EDUCATION M.S., Analytical Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 1990 B.A. magna cum laude, Chemistry and Biology, Brandeis University, 1983 LSPA Courses: -MCP Revisions,
2008 -Vapor Intrusion, 2007 -Environmental Chemistry, 2003 -Refresher Course, 2003 -Environmental Risk Characterization, 1996
O’Reilly, Talbot & Okun [ A S S O C I A T E S ] KevinJ.O’Reilly, LSP PRINCIPAL oreilly@oto-env.com phone: 413.788.6222 fax: 413.788.8830 www.oto-env.com AREAS OF EXPERTISE Facility Assessments
and Compliance Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Compliance Environmental Remediation Facility Assessments and Compliance Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Compliance Environmental
Remediation PROFILE Hydrogeologist and Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Kevin O’Reilly has more than 25 years of experience performing and managing a wide range of hazardous waste site
investigations and remediation projects, and has supervised more than 300 groundwater studies in New England. His experience includes hydrogeological groundwater remediation, sludge
disposal landfills, groundwater modeling, and soil and groundwater remediation. He has served as an expert witness in litigation cases determining responsible parties and remedial response
costs at hazardous waste disposal sites. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Nathan Bill Park Springfield, Massachusetts, ongoing As LSP, managed fast-tracked assessment of fill materials that were deposited
at site more than 60 years ago. Performed study, including a Method 3 Risk Characterization, that quickly demonstrated that surficial soils posed no risk to park users. Worked closely
with MassDEP and OTO professional engineers to develop cost effective cap design. Construction has been completed and the park is in use. The final report is scheduled to be submitted
in the summer of 2008. Dry Cleaning Facility East Longmeadow, 2004-2008 Served as LSP at dry-cleaning business where solvent had contaminated the groundwater. Used innovative vapor testing
methods and Method 3 risk characterization to eliminate the need for expensive remediation techniques that had been recommended by the previous consultant. Achieved site closure in months
instead of years and cut costs by over $100,000. Metal Salvage Business Chicopee, Massachusetts, 2006-2008 Served as LSP for investigation and remediation at an operating salvage yard
with extensive metal, oil and PCB soil contamination. Implemented an innovative and cost-effective on-site remediation plan where contaminated soil was relocated to an unused portion
of the property. Avoided expensive excavation procedures that would have jeopardized regular business operations. REGISTRATIONS and AFFILIATIONS Licensed Site Professional (LSP), Massachusetts
Former Member, Board of Directors, Licensed Site Professional Association (LSPA) EDUCATION M.S., Geotechnical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1980 B.S., Civil Engineering,
University of Notre Dame, 1978 B.S., Geology, University of Notre Dame, 1977