2021.04.26 Staff Report To: Historical Commission
From: Sarah LaValley
Re: April 26 2021 Historical Commission Staff Report
Please note that staff recommendations are based on the paper record. Applicants may present
other information that could be persuasive.
5:30 PM: Request for a Local Historic District Certificate of Appropriateness
pursuant to Section 195 of the Northampton Code for proposed roof, door, and
window replacement and modification, and roof HVAC work as part of major
building renovation. Trustees of Smith College, 33 Elm Street, Map ID 31B-253.
As part of a substantial building renovation project, work is proposed that includes exterior
architectural changes that are subject to Local Historic District review. These are door
replacement, window replacement, roof replacement, a dormer roof addition to conceal
mechanical equipment, doors in place of existing windows, and windows in place of existing
doors. Other exempt work, including interior renovations and landscaping is also proposed.
The Commission should review the Design Standards for each proposed piece of regulated work.
Excerpts below:
Dormers (page 24), and Architectural Elements, page 21:
New dormers should match existing ones. Where no dormers presently exist, new dormers shall
correspond in style with the other architectural features of the building, and must be
architecturally appropriate and have historic precedent.
Dormers may be installed, relocated, or removed, subject to the guideline for Architectural
Elements, provided that the historic nature (original proportions)
Original elements shall be retained to the extent possible. Alterations shall be carried out in a
way that does not damage or hide these elements. New architectural elements shall match the
old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, material. Architectural elements that falsify or
confuse the history of a building shall be avoided. Replacement of original elements should be
substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
Doors, page 24:
Existing original or later architecturally appropriate doors visible from a public way shall be
retained and repaired, including fanlights, sidelights, surrounds, canopies, transoms, and other
features that comprise the doorway.
The original entrance design and arrangement of door openings shall be retained. Enlarging or
reducing entrance/door openings for the purpose of fitting stock doors (larger or smaller) will
not be allowed. Enlarging door openings to meet mandated accessibility standards may be
`2
considered, provided that the original style, appearance, and materials of the doorway are
retained.
If a replacement door is necessary, the preferred material is wood. An alternate material may be
considered if the door is appropriately designed with regard to architectural style and
compatible with other doors on the building and of low visibility.
Windows, page 39
Original or later windows, trim and features should be retained and repaired except in cases
when they are beyond repair. In such cases, replacement must be based on physical,
photographic, or documentary evidence.
The introduction of openings not characteristic in proportion and scale and the blocking up of
original openings are not allowed.
Where the building has been altered to have several types of windows, proposed changes shall
be consistent with either the predominant window pattern of the building or the original historic
pattern.
Historic oriels shall not be removed or replaced. Alterations to oriels on the primary elevation
are inappropriate mandatory.
Retrofitting original window sashes with weather-stripping and/or insulated glass is
encouraged.
Alterations to the design and arrangement of window openings on the historic façade, other
than restoration to documented historical conditions, are generally not allowed.
Where it is not feasible to repair existing windows, replacement windows should meet the
following standards:
The replacement window shall be all wood or clad with metal exteriors and of the same
dimensions for muntins, frames, sash, rails, and stiles, and be of the same design (unless new
window is truer to original design than existing one to be replaced), and same number of panes
as the original or existing window.
Openings shall not be reduced or enlarged to accommodate stock sizes or shapes.
Glazing should be limited to the following: - Insulating glass - Single glass with removable
energy panels
Divided light options (muntin bars) should be limited to the following: - Authentic divided light
- Simulated divided light with spacer bar between insulating glass
The following are unacceptable options for divided lights: - Simulated divided light (applied to
glass) - Grilles between insulating glass - Removable grilles
Narrow muntin bars that closely match existing muntin widths. Muntin bars wider than 7/8” are
not acceptable
Wood clad exteriors are preferred. Aluminum clad exteriors are acceptable, provided the profile
reasonably matches existing window muntins.
If the Commission agrees that all or portions of the work meet the standards and is appropriate
for the character of the District, a Certificate of Appropriateness can be issued. The Commission
should refer to the Design Fundamentals on page 19 of the Standards.
If the Commission finds that a project is inappropriate (certificate is disapproved), it shall
consider whether a certificate of hardship should be issued. The Ordinance specifies that a
hardship can be issued if “owing to conditions especially affecting the building or structures
involved, but not affecting the historic district generally, failure to approve an application will
involve a substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the applicant and whether such
application may be approved without substantial detriment to the public welfare and without
substantial derogation from the intent and purposes of the Historic District Ordinance.
`3
Florence Proposed National Register District Update
The Committee for Northampton received Community Preservation Act funding in 2019 for
preparation of a National Register of Historic Places for sites in Florence that were part of
abolitionist history. The National Register is part of a national program to coordinate and
support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect our historic and
archeological resources. Properties listed in the National Register include districts, sites,
buildings, structures and objects that are significant in American history, architecture,
archeology, engineering, and culture. These resources contribute to an understanding of the
historical and cultural foundations of the nation. When complete, the nomination will be
submitted to MassHistoric and the National Park Service.