SouthStreetApptsERRNarrativeEnvironmental Review for Activity/Project that is
Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5
Pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(a)
Project Information
Project Name:
South-St.-Apartments-Rehab
HEROS Number:
900000010131345
Responsible Entity (RE):
NORTHAMPTON, 210 Main St Northampton MA, 01060
State / Local Identifier:
RE Preparer:
Keith Benoit
Certifying Officer:
Mayor David J. Narkewicz
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity):
Point of Contact:
Consultant (if applicable):
Point of Contact:
Project Location:
22 New South Street, Northampton, MA 01060
Additional Location Information:
The apartments are located at 22-34 New South Street, Northampton, MA 01060
Direct Comments to:
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
The use of CDBG funds will be used to pay for the design for this activity and per 24 CFR 58.34(a)(8) is an exempt activity. Other funding sources for this project will be used to repair,
replace, or improve the following elements of this historic residential building: heating and hot water equipment; fire alarm/fire protection system; selected kitchen cabinets, countertops,
stoves, and refrigerators; bathroom and kitchen flooring; installation of security cameras; lead and asbestos abatement; painting and; accessibility improvements in one apartment for
persons with physical impairments. There is one handicapped accessible apartment at the property. Home City Development will do significant work in that apartment so that it will conform
with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Massachusetts Architectural Access Board (MAAB) requirements. Other then replacement of selected rear apartment entry doors, the developer
is not planning any exterior improvements that would be of concern to Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) or National Park Service (NPS).
Maps, photographs, and other documentation of project location and description:
New_South_St_Photos_FY2020.pdf
Level of Environmental Review Determination:
Categorically Excluded per 24 CFR 58.35(a), and subject to laws and authorities at 58.5:
Determination:
This categorically excluded activity/project converts to EXEMPT per Section 58.34(a)(12), because it does not require any mitigation for compliance with any listed statutes or authorities,
nor requires any formal permit or license; Funds may be committed and drawn down after certification of this part for this (now) EXEMPT project; OR
(
This categorically excluded activity/project cannot convert to Exempt status because one or more statutes or authorities listed at Section 58.5 requires formal consultation or mitigation.
Complete consultation/mitigation protocol requirements, publish NOI/RROF and obtain “Authority to Use Grant Funds” (HUD 7015.16) per Section 58.70 and 58.71 before committing or drawing
down any funds; OR
This project is not categorically excluded OR, if originally categorically excluded, is now subject to a full Environmental Assessment according to Part 58 Subpart E due to extraordinary
circumstances (Section 58.35(c)).
Approval Documents:
7015.15 certified by Certifying Officer on:
7015.16 certified by Authorizing Officer on:
Funding Information
Grant / Project Identification Number
HUD Program
Program Name
B-19-MC-25-0027
Community Planning and Development (CPD)
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) (Entitlement)
Estimated Total HUD Funded, Assisted or Insured Amount:
$83,175.00
Estimated Total Project Cost:
$1,556,538.00
Compliance with 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5 and §58.6 Laws and Authorities
Compliance Factors:
Statutes, Executive Orders, and Regulations listed at 24 CFR §50.4, §58.5, and §58.6
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Compliance determination
(See Appendix A for source determinations)
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR §50.4 & § 58.6
Airport Hazards
Clear Zones and Accident Potential Zones; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D
( Yes ( No
The project site is not within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport. The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC 3501]
( Yes ( No
This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act.
Flood Insurance
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a]
( Yes ( No
The structure or insurable property is not located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area. While flood insurance may not be mandatory in this instance, HUD recommends that all
insurable structures maintain flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The project is in compliance with flood insurance requirements.
Flood Insurance
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a]
( Yes ( No
The structure or insurable property is not located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area. While flood insurance may not be mandatory in this instance, HUD recommends that all
insurable structures maintain flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The project is in compliance with flood insurance requirements.
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR §50.4 & § 58.5
Air Quality
Clean Air Act, as amended, particularly section 176(c) & (d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93
( Yes ( No
Based on the project description, this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under the Clean Air Act. The project is in compliance with the Clean Air
Act.
Coastal Zone Management Act
Coastal Zone Management Act, sections 307(c) & (d)
( Yes ( No
This project is not located in or does not affect a Coastal Zone as defined in the state Coastal Management Plan. The project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Contamination and Toxic Substances
24 CFR 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2)]
( Yes ( No
Site contamination was evaluated as follows: None of the above. On-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances that could affect the health and safety of project occupants
or conflict with the intended use of the property were not found. The project is in compliance with contamination and toxic substances requirements.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act of 1973, particularly section 7; 50 CFR Part 402
( Yes ( No
This project will have No Effect on listed species due to the nature of the activities involved in the project. This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act.
Explosive and Flammable Hazards
Above-Ground Tanks)[24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C
( Yes ( No
Based on the project description the project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable
hazard requirements.
Farmlands Protection
Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981, particularly sections 1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658
( Yes ( No
This project does not include any activities that could potentially convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy
Act.
Floodplain Management
Executive Order 11988, particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55
( Yes ( No
The following exception applies, so the project is in compliance with Executive Order 11988: 55.12(c)(10), special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers
that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities.
Historic Preservation
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800
( Yes ( No
Based on Section 106 consultation the project will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties. Conditions: None. Upon satisfactory implementation of the conditions, the project is
in compliance with Section 106.
Noise Abatement and Control
Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B
( Yes ( No
The project is modernization or minor rehabilitation of an existing residential property. A Preliminary Screening was performed, and found the following: The project has a 5 ft. setback
from the New South Street (MA Route 10), is less than 3,000 ft. from a railroad, and is within a mile of the Northampton Airport. . The project is in compliance with HUD's Noise regulation
with mitigation.
Sole Source Aquifers
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, particularly section 1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149
( Yes ( No
Based on the project description, the project consists of activities that are unlikely to have an adverse impact on groundwater resources. The project is in compliance with Sole Source
Aquifer requirements.
Wetlands Protection
Executive Order 11990, particularly sections 2 and 5
( Yes ( No
Based on the project description this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990.
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, particularly section 7(b) and (c)
( Yes ( No
This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. There are no study rivers nearby. This project will not effect
any of the rivers on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI).
HUD HOUSING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898
( Yes ( No
No adverse environmental impacts were identified in the project's total environmental review. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1505.2(c)]:
Summarized below are all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance
with the above-listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements and other relevant documents. The staff
responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.
Law, Authority, or Factor
Mitigation Measure or Condition
Comments on Completed Measures
Complete
Noise Abatement and Control
The engineering team plans to a provide a complete systems overview, which are free from objectionable generating noise or of excessive vibration. In the opinion of the Mechanical Engineer,
any items found in either of these conditions shall be corrected and noises or vibration dampened as directed. According to their contract document, they will do the following:
All vibration isolators must be installed in strict accordance with the manufacturers written instructions and all certified submittal data. Installation of vibration isolators must
not cause any change of position of equipment, piping or duct work resulting in stresses or misalignment. No rigid connections between equipment and the building structure shall be
made that degrades the noise and vibration control system herein specified. The contractor shall not install any equipment, piping, or duct which makes rigid connections with the building
unless isolation is not specified. "Building" includes, but is not limited to slabs, beams, columns, studs and walls. Coordinate work with other trades to avoid rigid contact with the
building. Any conflicts with other trades which will result in rigid contact with equipment or piping due to inadequate space or other unforeseen conditions should be brought to the
architects/engineers attention prior to installation. Corrective work necessitated by conflicts after installation shall be at the responsible contractors expense. Bring to the architects/engineers
attention any discrepancies between the specifications and the field conditions or changes required due to specific equipment selection, prior to installation. Corrective work necessitated
by discrepancies after installation shall be at the responsible contractors expense.
N/A
Noise Abatement and Control
The engineering team plans to a provide a complete systems overview, which are free from objectionable generating noise or of excessive vibration. In the opinion of the Mechanical Engineer,
any items found in either of these conditions shall be corrected and noises or vibration dampened as directed. According to their contract document, they will do the following:
All vibration isolators must be installed in strict accordance with the manufacturers written instructions and all certified submittal data. Installation of vibration isolators must
not cause any change of position of equipment, piping or duct work resulting in stresses or misalignment. No rigid connections between equipment and the building structure shall be
made that degrades the noise and vibration control system herein specified. The contractor shall not install any equipment, piping, or duct which makes rigid connections with the building
unless isolation is not specified. "Building" includes, but is not limited to slabs, beams, columns, studs and walls. Coordinate work with other trades to avoid rigid contact with the
building. Any conflicts with other trades which will result in rigid contact with equipment or piping due to inadequate space or other unforeseen conditions should be brought to the
architects/engineers attention prior to installation. Corrective work necessitated by conflicts after installation shall be at the responsible contractors expense. Bring to the architects/engineers
attention any discrepancies between the specifications and the field conditions or changes required due to specific equipment selection, prior to installation. Corrective work necessitated
by discrepancies after installation shall be at the responsible contractors expense.
N/A
Mitigation Plan
The noise mitigation measures will be carried out by the trades on the site. The site engineer will monitor the situation to ensure all mitigations measures are being followed and take
complaints/recommendations from the trades. Any noise complaints by residents will be followed through with. These measures will to take place when permanent equipment is set up and
the daily tasks that need mitigation.
Noise_Abatement_Plan_South_St_Appts.docx
Supporting documentation on completed measures
APPENDIX A: Related Federal Laws and Authorities
Airport Hazards
General policy
Legislation
Regulation
It is HUD’s policy to apply standards to prevent incompatible development around civil airports and military airfields.
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D
1. To ensure compatible land use development, you must determine your site’s proximity to civil and military airports. Is your project within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500
feet of a civilian airport?
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload the map showing that the site is not within the applicable distances to a military or civilian
airport below
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
The project site is not within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport. The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements.
Supporting documentation
South_St_Appts_Airport.pdf
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Coastal Barrier Resources
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
HUD financial assistance may not be used for most activities in units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS). See 16 USC 3504 for limitations on federal expenditures affecting
the CBRS.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) of 1982, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (16 USC 3501)
Is the project located in a CBRS Unit?
(
No
Document and upload map and documentation below.
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act.
Supporting documentation
MA_Coastal_Zones.pdf
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Flood Insurance
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Certain types of federal financial assistance may not be used in floodplains unless the community participates in National Flood Insurance Program and flood insurance is both obtained
and maintained.
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 as amended (42 USC 4001-4128)
24 CFR 50.4(b)(1) and 24 CFR 58.6(a) and (b); 24 CFR 55.1(b).
1. Does this project involve financial assistance for construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of a mobile home, building, or insurable personal property?
No. This project does not require flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance.
(
Yes
2. Upload a FEMA/FIRM map showing the site here:
South_St_Appts_Floodplain.pdf
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designates floodplains. The FEMA Map Service Center provides this information in the form of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). For
projects in areas not mapped by FEMA, use the best available information to determine floodplain information. Include documentation, including a discussion of why this is the best
available information for the site. Provide FEMA/FIRM floodplain zone designation, panel number, and date within your documentation.
Is the structure, part of the structure, or insurable property located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area?
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
The structure or insurable property is not located in a FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Area. While flood insurance may not be mandatory in this instance, HUD recommends that all
insurable structures maintain flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The project is in compliance with flood insurance requirements.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Air Quality
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
The Clean Air Act is administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which sets national standards on ambient pollutants. In addition, the Clean Air Act is administered
by States, which must develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to regulate their state air quality. Projects funded by HUD must demonstrate that they conform to the appropriate SIP.
Clean Air Act (42 USC 7401 et seq.) as amended particularly Section 176(c) and (d) (42 USC 7506(c) and (d))
40 CFR Parts 6, 51 and 93
1. Does your project include new construction or conversion of land use facilitating the development of public, commercial, or industrial facilities OR five or more dwelling units?
Yes
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Based on the project description, this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under the Clean Air Act. The project is in compliance with the Clean Air Act.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Coastal Zone Management Act
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Federal assistance to applicant agencies for activities affecting any coastal use or resource is granted only when such activities are consistent with federally approved State Coastal
Zone Management Act Plans.
Coastal Zone Management Act (16 USC 1451-1464), particularly section 307(c) and (d) (16 USC 1456(c) and (d))
15 CFR Part 930
1. Is the project located in, or does it affect, a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Management Plan?
Yes
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
This project is not located in or does not affect a Coastal Zone as defined in the state Coastal Management Plan. The project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Supporting documentation
MA_Coastal_Zones(1).pdf
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Contamination and Toxic Substances
General requirements
Legislation
Regulations
It is HUD policy that all properties that are being proposed for use in HUD programs be free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances,
where a hazard could affect the health and safety of the occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property.
24 CFR 58.5(i)(2)
24 CFR 50.3(i)
1. How was site contamination evaluated? Select all that apply. Document and upload documentation and reports and evaluation explanation of site contamination below.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
ASTM Phase II ESA
Remediation or clean-up plan
ASTM Vapor Encroachment Screening
(
None of the Above
2. Were any on-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances found that could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the
property? (Were any recognized environmental conditions or RECs identified in a Phase I ESA and confirmed in a Phase II ESA?)
(
No
Explain:
According to Mass. Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs (EEA), there were no waste sites & reportable releases reported on this site or in the vicinity. Per Mass. Department
of Environmental Protection, there were no underground storage tanks (UST) on the site on its immediate vicinity.
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Site contamination was evaluated as follows: None of the above. On-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances that could affect the health and safety of project occupants
or conflict with the intended use of the property were not found. The project is in compliance with contamination and toxic substances requirements.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Endangered Species
General requirements
ESA Legislation
Regulations
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) mandates that federal agencies ensure that actions that they authorize, fund, or carry out shall not jeopardize the continued existence
of federally listed plants and animals or result in the adverse modification or destruction of designated critical habitat. Where their actions may affect resources protected by the
ESA, agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (“FWS” and “NMFS” or “the Services”).
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); particularly section 7 (16 USC 1536).
50 CFR Part 402
1. Does the project involve any activities that have the potential to affect specifies or habitats?
(
No, the project will have No Effect due to the nature of the activities involved in the project.
This selection is only appropriate if none of the activities involved in the project have potential to affect species or habitats. Examples of actions without potential to affect listed
species may include: purchasing existing buildings, completing interior renovations to existing buildings, and replacing exterior paint or siding on existing buildings.
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
No, the project will have No Effect based on a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement, programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office
Yes, the activities involved in the project have the potential to affect species and/or habitats.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
This project will have No Effect on listed species due to the nature of the activities involved in the project. This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Explosive and Flammable Hazards
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
HUD-assisted projects must meet Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards.
N/A
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C
1. Is the proposed HUD-assisted project itself the development of a hazardous facility (a facility that mainly stores, handles or processes flammable or combustible chemicals such as
bulk fuel storage facilities and refineries)?
(
No
Yes
2. Does this project include any of the following activities: development, construction, rehabilitation that will increase residential densities, or conversion?
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Based on the project description the project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable
hazard requirements.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Farmlands Protection
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
The Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) discourages federal activities that would convert farmland to nonagricultural purposes.
Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 (7 U.S.C. 4201 et seq.)
7 CFR Part 658
1. Does your project include any activities, including new construction, acquisition of undeveloped land or conversion, that could convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use?
Yes
(
No
If your project includes new construction, acquisition of undeveloped land or conversion, explain how you determined that agricultural land would not be converted:
This project does not involve new construction, acquisition of or conversion of undeveloped land.
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
This project does not include any activities that could potentially convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy
Act.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Floodplain Management
General Requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, requires federal activities to avoid impacts to floodplains and to avoid direct and indirect support of floodplain development to the extent
practicable.
Executive Order 11988
24 CFR 55
1. Do any of the following exemptions apply? Select the applicable citation? [only one selection possible]
55.12(c)(3)
55.12(c)(4)
55.12(c)(5)
55.12(c)(6)
55.12(c)(7)
55.12(c)(8)
55.12(c)(9)
(
55.12(c)(10)
55.12(c)(11)
None of the above
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
The following exception applies, so the project is in compliance with Executive Order 11988: 55.12(c)(10), special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers
that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Historic Preservation
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Regulations under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) require a consultative process to identify historic properties, assess project impacts on them, and avoid,
minimize, or mitigate adverse effects
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(16 U.S.C. 470f)
36 CFR 800 “Protection of Historic Properties” http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_10/36cfr800_10.html
Threshold
Is Section 106 review required for your project?
No, because the project consists solely of activities listed as exempt in a Programmatic Agreement (PA ). (See the PA Database to find applicable PAs.)
No, because the project consists solely of activities included in a No Potential to Cause Effects memo or other determination [36 CFR 800.3(a)(1)].
(
Yes, because the project includes activities with potential to cause effects (direct or indirect).
Step 1 – Initiate Consultation
Select all consulting parties below (check all that apply):
( State Historic Preservation Offer (SHPO)
Completed
( Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Not Required
(
Indian Tribes, including Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs)
(
Other Consulting Parties
( Northampton Historical Commission
Completed
Describe the process of selecting consulting parties and initiating consultation here:
Home City Development hired Epsilon Associates, Inc. to complete the Section 106 process. They consulted with the Northampton Historical Commission and sent a project notification from
(PNF) to the MA Historical Commission that determined that "no adverse effect" would occur during this project.
Document and upload all correspondence, notices and notes (including comments and objections received below).
Step 2 – Identify and Evaluate Historic Properties
Define the Area of Potential Effect (APE), either by entering the address(es) or uploading a map depicting the APE below:
The area is the apartment complex at 22-34 New South Street, Northampton, MA, 01060. Several historic resources exist within a one eighth-mile radius of the property. Additionally, the
building is within the boundaries of a National Register Historic District, the Northampton Downtown Historic District.
In the chart below, list historic properties identified and evaluated in the APE. Every historic property that may be affected by the project should be included in the chart.
Upload the documentation (survey forms, Register nominations, concurrence(s) and/or objection(s), notes, and photos) that justify your National Register Status determination below.
Address / Location / District
National Register Status
SHPO Concurrence
Sensitive Information
22 New South Street, Northampton, MA 01060
Listed
Yes
( Not Sensitive
34 New South Street, Northampton, MA 01060
Listed
Yes
( Not Sensitive
Additional Notes:
Was a survey of historic buildings and/or archeological sites done as part of the project?
Yes
(
No
Step 3 –Assess Effects of the Project on Historic Properties
Only properties that are listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places receive further consideration under Section 106. Assess the effect(s) of the project by
applying the Criteria of Adverse Effect. (36 CFR 800.5)] Consider direct and indirect effects as applicable as per guidance on direct and indirect effects.
Choose one of the findings below - No Historic Properties Affected, No Adverse Effect, or Adverse Effect; and seek concurrence from consulting parties.
No Historic Properties Affected
(
No Adverse Effect
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Document reason for finding:
According to 36 CFR As. 800.5(b) and confirmed by the MHC's PNF response, there is no adverse effect to the project building or Northampton Historic District. Per the developers PNF,
they are also making every effort to ensure that the historical character of this site are not affected: "Exterior work will include painting of portions of the faAs.ade to match existing,
replacement of rear unit entry doors and storm doors, selective in-kind deck repair and installation of security cameras at rear decks and walkways. The rear doors which will be replaced
are not historic. Interior work will include replacement of in-unit gas heating equipment with new energy-efficient systems, to be located in the basement, and upgrades to fire alarm
and fire protection systems to meet current life safety codes. Flooring in unit kitchens and bathrooms will be replaced along with cabinets, countertops, fixtures and appliances and
units will be painted. Lead and asbestos will be abated and security cameras will be installed in laundry rooms. Historic windows throughout the building will be retained, along with
the historic wood paneled entry doors at the main (west) elevation. Wood siding, porches, and trim features will be retained. No roof repairs will be undertaken."
According to 36 CFR As. 800.5(b) and confirmed by the MHC's PNF response, there is no adverse effect to the project building or Northampton Historic District. Per the developers PNF,
they are also making every effort to ensure that the historical character of this site are not affected: "Exterior work will include painting of portions of the faAs.ade to match existing,
replacement of rear unit entry doors and storm doors, selective in-kind deck repair and installation of security cameras at rear decks and walkways. The rear doors which will be replaced
are not historic. Interior work will include replacement of in-unit gas heating equipment with new energy-efficient systems, to be located in the basement, and upgrades to fire alarm
and fire protection systems to meet current life safety codes. Flooring in unit kitchens and bathrooms will be replaced along with cabinets, countertops, fixtures and appliances and
units will be painted. Lead and asbestos will be abated and security cameras will be installed in laundry rooms. Historic windows throughout the building will be retained, along with
the historic wood paneled entry doors at the main (west) elevation. Wood siding, porches, and trim features will be retained. No roof repairs will be undertaken."
Does the No Adverse Effect finding contain conditions?
Yes (check all that apply)
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload concurrence(s) or objection(s) below.
Adverse Effect
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Based on Section 106 consultation the project will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties. Conditions: None. Upon satisfactory implementation of the conditions, the project is
in compliance with Section 106.
Supporting documentation
South_St_Appts_PNF_Response.pdf
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Noise Abatement and Control
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
HUD’s noise regulations protect residential properties from excessive noise exposure. HUD encourages mitigation as appropriate.
Noise Control Act of 1972
General Services Administration Federal Management Circular 75-2: “Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields”
Title 24 CFR 51 Subpart B
1. What activities does your project involve? Check all that apply:
New construction for residential use
(
Rehabilitation of an existing residential property
NOTE: For modernization projects in all noise zones, HUD encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. See 24 CFR 51 Subpart B for further details. The
definition of “modernization” is determined by program office guidance.
A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction
An interstate land sales registration
Any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provision or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris
and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster
None of the above
2. Do you have standardized noise attenuation measures that apply to all modernization and/or minor rehabilitation projects, such as the use of double glazed windows or extra insulation?
Yes
(
No
3. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000’ from a major road, 3000’ from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport).
Describe findings of the Preliminary Screening:
The project has a 5 ft. setback from the New South Street (MA Route 10), is less than 3,000 ft. from a railroad, and is within a mile of the Northampton Airport.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
The project is modernization or minor rehabilitation of an existing residential property. A Preliminary Screening was performed, and found the following: The project has a 5 ft. setback
from the New South Street (MA Route 10), is less than 3,000 ft. from a railroad, and is within a mile of the Northampton Airport. . The project is in compliance with HUD's Noise regulation
with mitigation.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Sole Source Aquifers
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 protects drinking water systems which are the sole or principal drinking water source for an area and which, if contaminated, would create a significant
hazard to public health.
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 201, 300f et seq., and 21 U.S.C. 349)
40 CFR Part 149
1. Does the project consist solely of acquisition, leasing, or rehabilitation of an existing building(s)?
(
Yes
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
No
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Based on the project description, the project consists of activities that are unlikely to have an adverse impact on groundwater resources. The project is in compliance with Sole Source
Aquifer requirements.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Wetlands Protection
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Executive Order 11990 discourages direct or indirect support of new construction impacting wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative. The Fish and Wildlife Service’s National
Wetlands Inventory can be used as a primary screening tool, but observed or known wetlands not indicated on NWI maps must also be processed Off-site impacts that result in draining,
impounding, or destroying wetlands must also be processed.
Executive Order 11990
24 CFR 55.20 can be used for general guidance regarding the 8 Step Process.
1. Does this project involve new construction as defined in Executive Order 11990, expansion of a building’s footprint, or ground disturbance? The term "new construction" shall include
draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, and related activities and any structures or facilities begun or authorized after the effective date of the Order
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Yes
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
Based on the project description this project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides federal protection for certain free-flowing, wild, scenic and recreational rivers designated as components or potential components of the National
Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) from the effects of construction or development.
The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287), particularly section 7(b) and (c) (16 U.S.C. 1278(b) and (c))
36 CFR Part 297
1. Is your project within proximity of a NWSRS river?
(
No
Yes, the project is in proximity of a Designated Wild and Scenic River or Study Wild and Scenic River.
Yes, the project is in proximity of a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) River.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. There are no study rivers nearby. This project will not effect
any of the rivers on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI).
Supporting documentation
Scenic_Rivers_Northampton.png
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No
Environmental Justice
General requirements
Legislation
Regulation
Determine if the project creates adverse environmental impacts upon a low-income or minority community. If it does, engage the community in meaningful participation about mitigating
the impacts or move the project.
Executive Order 12898
HUD strongly encourages starting the Environmental Justice analysis only after all other laws and authorities, including Environmental Assessment factors if necessary, have been completed.
1. Were any adverse environmental impacts identified in any other compliance review portion of this project’s total environmental review?
Yes
(
No
Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section.
Screen Summary
Compliance Determination
No adverse environmental impacts were identified in the project's total environmental review. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898.
Supporting documentation
Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required?
Yes
(
No