The URL can be used to link to this page

14-007 163 Kennedy rd planningC 1 F1 L1 FORM A NORTHAMPTON, MA APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File five completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Planaiaq Board in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.02. To the pl an-1 ^ q Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property division within the meaning of the in the City of Nor -hampton does not constitute Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and Subdivision Control Law is not endorsement that Planning Board approval under t required. 71 H � �a A F k �. 1. Applican t Print or type name z 1651 C4�t� f4o I 584- -09 53 Phone Address Owner �C�1�N �JOi4N SfAFiI 2. Print or type name Saga % 105' CN t 4 6 5 - 0 59 Phon Address /� u /j i AU A J`I�f� 3 . Surveyor AM ' `V�`�� - Print or type name Signature vF isr' I �Io�N 5S4 30 INNS A� Pho Address p� 4. Deed or property recorded in AM Registry, Book Z5(0 2 Page 132- 5. Location and Description of Property: Fgapem Na'g A b - I K Ly 51..�FF OF CHS Ifygof i eLb 'RDA 6. Assessor's Map ID: Lot (s) Date Submitted for Planning Date Planning B and Board Approval: ec. ion Fil Clerk City Clerk: ign ) (Signature) (8/13/91) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - -- --PAGE 60 0 PROCEDURE FOR ACCEPTING FORM A'S APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW All of the following must be included in order to be considered a full application for endorsement: A. The original, reproducible ( mylar) drawing of the Plan, with the endorsed Seal of a Professional Land Surveyor, registered with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, B. Five (5) prints of the Plan, C. Five (5) copies of the fully completed and endorsed application "Form A ", D. Filing Fee made payable to the City of'Northampton: . $50.00 per sheet PLUS $50.00 per lot if there are not four points tied to the Mass. State Plane system (1927 datum) PLUS $25.00 per sheet when no electronic version is provided NO APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE INCLUDED Application should be delivered to the City Clerk for date stamping and then delivered to the Office of Planning and Development. All accepted Applications will be acted upon within twenty -one (21) days of their acceptance. Once an Application has been acted upon, the Applicant receives back only the original, reproducible (mylar) drawing. The five (5) prints and the five (5) "Form A's" shall remain in the Office of Planning and Development for distribution and the Filing Fee shall be deposited with the City (regardless of whether the Plan has been approved or'disapproved). SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - - -- -PAGE 61 C s I F� U� FORM A NORTHAMPTON, MA APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File five completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Pl annin g Board in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.02. To the Pl annin g Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Applicant V O i O + TOAN - t F I Print or type name nature 1 45 t CRn � F•10--b VOA.b MoA 594 Address Phone 2 . Owner Zo NN Print or type name Si.ga t 3. 4. S. 6. CNE3 W- FIE &Ab. N6C' A M 584 0 959 _loci Address Phone Surveyor Print or type name Signature 3o Wwsm(AL I t e tAsT. Iyo��lDN 5S4 - 744+ Address r Phone Deed or property recorded in H.4/ P rH I P F Registry, Book 25(O z7 Page 132- Location and Description of Property: F" uoC^' - n d,-j 1W 1�0�51- 1�R� -y Std O: CHIES" gofje b J?4oAb Assessor's Map ID: I& Lot(s): I Date Submitted for Planning Date Planning BO AZ Board Approval: 6c�sion Fi City Clerk: Cit (Signature) lgna u (8/13/91) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - - -- -PAGE 60 4 PROCEDURE FOR ACCEPTING FORM A'S APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW All of the following must be included in order to be considered a full application for endorsement: _ A. The original, reproducible (mylar) drawing of the Plan, with the endorsed Seal of a Professional Land Surveyor, registered with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, B. Five (5) prints of.the Plan, C. Five (5) copies of the fully completed and endorsed application "Form A D. Filing Fee made payable to the City of'Northampton: . $50.00 per sheet PLUS $50.00 per lot if there are not four points tied to the Mass. State Plane system (1927 datum) PLUS $25.00 per sheet when no electronic version is provided NO APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE INCLUDED Application should be delivered to the City Clerk for date stamping and then delivered to the Office of Planning and Development. All accepted Applications will be acted upon within twenty -one (21) days of their acceptance. Once an Application has been acted upon, the Applicant receives back only the original, reproducible (mylar) drawing. The five (5) prints and the five (5) "Form A's" shall remain in the office of Planning and Development for distribution and the Filing Fee shall be deposited with the City (regardless of whether the Plan has been approved or disapproved). SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - - -- - PAGE 61 *Mor FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE: January 30, 1998 DATE: TO: NORTHAMPTON PLANNING BOARD .d I hg reby d r ,t�a I e allowed to withdraw my application for peci 1 lg (Vest it wit ite pproval to build a sing e family a residence within 200 feet of a brook in a WSP distri '4hich was filed on October 3, 1996. (See attached letter for signature) (See Attached Letter for Signature) Applicant ------------------------------ - - - - -- r � r` �l 7 -- - - - - -- ' - - -' - - -- On January'22, 1998, the Northampton Planning Board unanimously voted 6:0 to accept the withdrawal of the Special Permit application without prejudice. City of Northampton, Massachusetts Office of Planning and Development N ity Hall • 210 Main Street orthampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950 FAX (413) 586 -3726 • Conservation Commission • Historical Commission • Housing Partnership • Parking Commission • Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals Northampton Planning Board Minutes of Meeting January 22, 1998 ,.. ► 11 The Northampton Planning Board held a meeting on Thursday, January 22, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Wallace J. Puchalski Municipal Building, 212 Main Street, Northampton, Massachusetts. Present were Members: Vice Chair Daniel J. Yacuzzo, Paul Diemand, Kenneth Jodrie, Anne Romano and Associate Members Rick Marquis and Sanford Weil, Jr. Staff. Planning Director Wayne Feiden, Senior Planner Paulette Kuzdeba and Board Secretary Laura r zler. At 7:10 p.m., Yacuzzo opened the meeting. At 7:32 p.m., Yacuzzo opened the Continuation of a Public Hearing on a request from Donald A. Chiulli for a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval to build a single family residence within 200 feet of a brook in a WSP District under Section 16.7 (1)(D) and 10.11 (6) of the Zoning Ordinance for property located at 163 Kennedy Road, known as Assessor's Map #14, Parcels 7 and 8. Yacuzzo read the legal notice. Yacuzzo read a letter from the applicant requesting permission to withdraw the application without prejudice and requesting that the Planning Board waive any future filing fee when the application is resubmitted. odrie moved to accept the withdrawal without prejudice and to waive a future filing fee. IDDiemand seconded. Weil requested that the two actions be presented as separate motions. Jodrie moved to waive the future filing fee. Diemand seconded. ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Var ../ Weil commented that he thought it was not appropriate to waive the filing fee, since the purpose of the fee is to cover the expense of notifying abutters, etc. If the applicant's fee is waived, the City will have to pay for these expenses, he noted. However, other members pointed out that the Board has waived filing fees in the past. After further discussion, the motion passed 5:1 (Weil opposed). Jodrie moved to accept the the withdrawal without prejudice. Romano seconded. The motion passed unanimously 6:0. `/ -m./ City of Northampton, Massachusetts Office of Planning and Development City Hall • 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950 FAX (413) 586 -3726 • Community and Economic Development • Conservation • Historic Preservation • Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals • Northampton Parking Commission DECISION OF NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: Donald Chiulli 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds Donald Chiulli 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds RE LAND OR BUILDINGS IN NORTHAMPTON AT: 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds ASSESSOR'S MAP and PARCEL NUMBERS: MAP 14 PARCELS 7 & 8 At a meeting conducted on October 6, 1995, the Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously voted 3:0 to grant the request of Donald A. Chiulli for a VARIANCE under the provisions of Section 6.2 in the Northampton Zoning Ordinance, to allow the creation of a new lot with insufficient lot depth. at 163 Kennedy road, Leeds, MA. Zoning Board Members present and voting were: Vice Chair C. Sanford Weil, Members: Alex Ghiselin and Elaine Reall. In GRANTING the request for a Variance, the Zoning Board of Appeals found: 1. That circumstances exist relating to the topography of such the land and the location and orientation of the structure in question, that effects the property in question, but does not generally effect the zoning district in which the site is located, because the site is unique as far as the location of the barn on the site and it's orientation. 2. That a literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship in the form of a financial hardship to the petitioner because it would deny the applicant use of the barn and would be cost prohibitive to move the barn. ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER aec�ac�� goat "l�ao "a9r L ..i 3. That desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good because the site is unique and there would not be any outward signs that a change had been made on the property, once the new lot lines were drawn. Furthermore, the granting of this varianc does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The following conditions are imposed upon this variance: 1. No further subdivision of the lot, after the receipt of a Flag lot permit. 2. The site shall be used for residential purposes only and the barn shall not be used for-residential purposes. 3. The variance would be contingent upon the approval of a flag lot special permit. `o.r IM/ Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws (MGL) Chapter 40A, Section 11, no Variance or any extension, modification or renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed after the decision has been filed, or if such an appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Hampshire County Registry of Deeds or Land Court, as applicable, and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for such recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. It is the owner or applicant's responsibility to pick up a the certified decision of the City Clerk and record it at the Registry of Deeds. The Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals hereby certifies that a Variance has been granted and that copies of this decision and all plans referred to in it have been filed with the Planning Board and the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 15, notice is hereby given that this decision is filed with the Northampton City Clerk on the date below. If you wish to appeal this action, your appeal must be filed pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A Section 17, with the Hampshire County Superior Court and notice of this appeal filed with the City Clerk within twenty (20) days of the date this decision was filed with the City Clerk. Applicant: DONALD A. CHIULLI - 163 KENNEDY ROAD, LEEDS Decision Date: October 6. 1995 This Decision was Filed with the City Clerk on: October 20, 1995 U ti� M. San ord Weil, Jr. l� Alex Ghlselin Elaine M. Reall `.r CITY OF NORTHAMPTON % ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RE: APPLICATION OF DONALD A. CHIULLI FOR DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Revised 4 October 1995) I. CAN A ZONING VARIANCE BE GRANTED ON THE BASIS OF CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE? Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 10, authorizes local zoning boards to grant variances with respect to particular structures where: owing to circumstances relating to... such... structures and especially affecting such... structures but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance... would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner or appellant, and... desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of such ordinance... The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has upheld zoning variances in cases dealing with existing structures. Johnson v. Board of Appeals of Wareham 360 Mass. 872, 277 N.E.2d 695 (1972) (conversion of a church into office in residential zone). II. CAN A LIMITATION ON THE USE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP? In Johnson supra, the Court found hardship in an owner's inability to convert its 40 year old solid frame church building into office suites. The Court stated, "the hardship is not being able reasonably to use this unusual, if not unique and substantial building..." III. CAN THE CHARACTER OF A STRUCTURE CONSTITUTE A UNIQUE CONDITION AFFECTING THE PARTICULAR STRUCTURE BUT NOT THE ZONING DISTRICT IN GENERAL? The unique conditions required for a variance may be found only in the shape, topography or soil conditions of the lot itself or in the character of existing buildings located on the lot. Unusual existing buildings which are structurally sound, have remaining value and are not well suited to conforming uses have been found sufficient, apart from all other considerations, to establish the uniqueness of the lot in question. MCLE Massachusetts Zoning Manual Section 9.07, page 9 -12, citing Johnson supra. IV. CAN THE LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF A DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT AFFECTING AN EXISTING STRUCTURE CREATE A HARDSHIP WHICH JUSTIFIES A VARIANCE? In Brackett v. Board of Appeals of Boston 311 Mass. 52, 39 N.E.2d 956 (1942), the Court held: "No one factor determines the question of what is prac%,,,cal difficulty or unnecess..ly hardship, but all relevant factors, when taken together, must indicate that the plight of the premises in question is unique in that they cannot be put reasonably to a conforming use..." Even relatively minor "hardship" can justify a variance where inconsequential dimensional variances are involved. Josephs v. Board of Appeals of Brookline 362 Mass. 293, 285 N.E.2d 438 (1972) (Alternative schemes to bring proposed 15 -story building into compliance with loading requirements would involve either safety hazards or loss of usable space within the proposed building). As a general matter, a lesser showing of hardship is appropriate for dimensional variances because they usually do not change the character of the zoning district or endanger nearby properties with an inconsistent land use. DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of Rockport 19 Mass.App.Ct. 339, 474 N.E.2d 198 (1984). "[N]ot being able reasonably to use [an] unusual ... and substantial 'existing building"' is a hardship justifying issuance of a variance. Johnson supra. V. WILL THE GRANT OF A DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD OR NULLIFY OR SUBSTANTIALLY DEROGATE FROM THE INTENT OR PURPOSE OF THE NORTHAMPTON ZONING ORDINANCE? Where a modest dimensional variance is sought rather than a use variance, the courts are more willing to find that there has been no substantial derogation from the intent of the ordinance. MCLE Massachusetts Zoning Manual §9.09, p. 9 -18, citing Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevel. Auth. 374 Mass 37, 371 N.E.2d 728 (1977). In an report entitled "Report of the Department of Community Affairs Relative to Proposed Zoning Changes and Additions to the Zoning Enabling Act," the DCA stated: the strict approach to the granting of use variances adopted by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is, of course, entirely justified in view of the deleterious erosion to the zoning plan which is caused by the overly generous utilization of 'use' variance granting power... whether the same strict standards are necessary in the protection of the public interest when dimensional variances are involved is doubtful. Date: 4 October 1995 Respectfully submitted, DONALD A. CHIULLI By his attorney, John B. Howard 39 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 (4 13) 584 -3605 859MM002.004 Date Filed File No. ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1. Name of Applicant: Donald A. Chiulli Address: 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds, MA Telephone: 2. Owner of Property: Same Address: Telephone: 3. Status of Applicant: x Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee Other (explain )' 4. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheeti P J - L Pa Zoning District(s) (include overl n Rd Street Address /& 3 a , Q Required 5. Existing Proposed by Zonin Use of Structure /Property Residential Same (if project is only interior work, skip to #6) Building height n a n a NMT: %Bldg. Coverage (Footprint)LT 0% 1 LT 2 LT 10 15% 2 10% Setbacks - front 25 + 1 + 80 - side L: 250'+ R: !+ L: Same R: '+ 40 - rear 1000 1) 100'± 2) 600 1) 50 2) 100 Lot size 14.581 acres 1 80,000 2)12.744A± 80,000 each Frontage . 407,84 50' Floor Area Ratio -.Open Space (Lot area minus building and parking) Parking Spaces Loading Signs NnNR Fill (volume & location) 6. Narrative Description of Proposed Work /Project: (Use additional sheets if necessary) Applicant wishes to create a flag lot for construction of a new single - family residence and to include the existing barn and tennis court proposed item 2 above). Applicant wishes to create a lot encompassing the existing house (item 1 above) in full compliance with Zoning Ordinance except for insufficient lot depth in area between existing house and the barn (See Preliminary Plan). 7. Attached Plans: x Sketch Plan Site Plan " Preliminar Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli" 8. Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowl e. Date: , 13. `j S Applicant's Signature: — — — — — — — — — — _ _ _ _ _ — l_QnAld A,,, _Qh;LuJ, — TKIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY: Approved as pp presented /based on information presented _Tz6enied as presented--Reason: Special'* Permit and /or Site Plan Required: Finding Required: Variance Required: Signature of B ding Inspector to NOTE: issuance of a zoning permit does not refiove an applicant's burden to comply Willi all zoning roquiromonts and obtain all roqulrod ponnfts from the Board of Noalth, Consorvalion Commission, Dopattmont of Public Works and othor applicable pormit oranting authoritios. /('9•)- ti.. 9� � / ..W CITY OF NORTHAMPTON 1. Applicant's Name D I'ir/ 1 1 7 1995 i VARIANCE APPLICATION i t' Aftl ona] d A. Chiulli Address PO Box 544, Leeds, MA 01053 Teleph 2. Property Owner's Name: Dona A. Chiulli Address: Po Box 544, Leeds, MA 01053 Telephone: 3. Status of Applicant (explain: 4. Parcel Identification Street Address 163 5. Variance is requeste D 7 J X Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee Other Zoning Map # 14 Parcel # 70 ; Zoning Districts & w p Kennedy Road, Northampton (Leeds) 6.2 6 -2 �d under Zoning Ordinance Section 10 . , Page 10 -3 Narrative Description of Proposed Work /Project (use additional sheets if necessary) see attached Addendum A State How Work /Proposal Complies with Variance Criteria (See Applicant's Guide and use additional sheets if necessary) See attached Addendum A Attached Plans Sketch Plan X Site Plan None Required 9. Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached. 10. Certification I hereby certify that I have read the VARIANCE CRITERIA, and that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date: g Applicants Signature: ✓ ( Date Filed: File #: (zba/variance.zba 8/24/92) ADDENDUM A, 6. Narrative Description of Proposed Work /Proiect The Applicant intends to apply to the Planning Board for a Special Permit to create a Flag Lot for the construction of a new single family dwelling. The proposed Flag Lot will have approximately 12.744 acres and will include the existing barn and tennis court on the property. Before he can file such an application, the Applicant must obtain a Variance to create a separate lot encompassing the existing dwelling house, but excluding the barn and tennis court. The dwelling lot will contain 1.837 acres and will be in full compliance with the Northampton Zoning Ordinance, except for insufficient lot depth in the area between the house and the barn. Section 6.2 of the Ordinance requires a lot depth of 200 feet, and a portion of the rear line of the proposed lot lies within the 200 foot minimum. 7. State How Work /Proposal Complies with Variance Criteria The Applicant purchased thi a Flag Lot and building personal residence, and requisite amount of land. existing barn, which has intended to renovate. property with the intention of creating a new single family dwelling as his selling the existing dwelling and a He intended to retain ownership of the historical significance and which he After purchasing the property, the Applicant learned that the Ordinance requires a minimum depth of 200 feet for any new lot in this zone, and that this requirement applies to the proposed new lot for the existing dwelling. Since a portion of the barn lies within 200 feet of the road, it would be impossible to exclude the barn from the proposed new lot without a dimensional variance. In order for the Applicant to fully comply with the dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, he would have to either include the barn with the proposed lot for the existing dwelling, and thus give up its ownership, or move the barn further to the east, which would involve great expense. Because of the circumstances of the barn's location, circumstances which do not effect generally the zoning district in which the property is located, a literal enforcement of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance would involve a substantial hardship, financial and otherwise, to the Applicant. Desirable relief in the form of a dimensional variance for the proposed lot for the existing dwelling may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the or .,.pur of the Ordinance. Fn i� 859ADDA1.724 ALIG 1 7 1995 CC i� F! 5 _ F —� 1 7 i995 S Date Filed r. File No. ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION ( §10.2) I. Name of Applicant Donald A. Chiulli Address 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds, MA Telephone: 2. Owner of Property: Same Address: Telephone: 3. Status of Applicant: x Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee Other (explain ) 4. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map Sheet` Pa cele Zonin g Districts) (include over s) UJ g Street Address Required 5• Existing Proposed by Zonin Use of Structure /Property Residential Same (if project is only interior work, skip to #6) Building height n a n a NMT: oBldg. Coverage (Footprint)LT 10% 1 LT 10% 2 LT 1 1 % 2 10% Setbacks - front 25 + 80 - side L: 250!± R: + L: S C R: ,+ 40 - rear 1000 1) 100'± 2) 600 1) 50 2) Lot size 14,581 acres 1 80,000 2 12. 744A± 80,000 each Frontage . 501 Floor Area Ratio %Open Space (Lot area minus building and parking) Parking Spaces Loading Signs Fill (volume & location) 6. Narrative Description of Proposed Work /Project: (Use additional sheets if necessary) Applicant wishes to create a flag lot for construction of a new single - family residence and to include the existing barn and tennis court proposed item 2 above). App licant wishes to create a lot encompassing the existing house (item 1 above) in full compliance with Zoning Ordinance except for insufficient lot depth in area between existing house and the barn (See Preliminary Plan). 7. Attached Plans: x Sketch Plan Site Plan "Preliminar Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli" 8. Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date: LLA � 3 • 9 S Applicants I s Signature: THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY: QgnAlJ A _Qh;LuJ,] i_ _ Approved as presented /based on information presented - :E,_-6enied as presented--Reason: Special* Permit and /or Site Plan Required: Finding Required: — Variance Required: Signature of B i ding Inspector 4te NOTE Issuance of a zoning pormit does not roflovo an applicant's burdon to comply whit all zoning roquiromonts and obtain all roquirod pormhs from tho Board of Hoalth, Consomatlon Commission, Dopa,tmont of Public Works and otiior appiicabio Pormh granting authoftos. le 9•)- .`, City of Northampton, Massachusetts Office of Planning and Development City Hall • 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950 • Community and Economic Development • Conservation* Historic Preservation • Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals Special Permit Issued by Planning Board .r' Map I. D. ly fA � t5' File Date Submitted & / -Zf1 OPD Staff Review for fee ✓and for completeness and for B.I. signature Planner Review Set up public file folder Legal Notice Gazette -TeQ ' o�QG 'A"t&y( ` ems- A (Notice 7 and 14 days before hearing) Legal Notice Posted �� _� Agenda Posted Letter to Owner Letter to Abutters /Towns Copy to BI Copy to DPW Copy to BOH Copy to C.C. Copy to Fire Dept. Copy to P.B. members Planning Board Hearing Planning Board Decision Decision filed with City Clerk & 'A" /ft Decision mailed to: Owner /Abutters /Towns l�� / `/ 4 Decision to DPW Decision to BI I LL 9p Permit entered on computer Decision filed O.P.D. I --- (Memorex: PLAN.BD \PBINSTRU 4/3/92) 70'1, A NORTHAMPTON, MA APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File five completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Planning Board in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.02. To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval un r the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Applicant Donald L. Chi.ulli 2 �r Print or type name Signature T d-dress 163 Kennedy Road Northamp 586 - 7956 d Phone 2 , owner Same Print or type name Signature Address Phone 3. Surveyor Harold L. Eaton & Assoc. Print or type name Signature 235 Russell Street Hadley phone Address R e g istry, Re 4. Deed or property recorded in Ham g y 4611 178 Book Page 5. Location and Description of Property: Two parcels of land on the East side of Kennedy Road. 6. Assessor's Map ID: 14 Lot(s): 7 R Date Submitted for Planning Date Planning _Bo Board Approval: Decision ri l7/ City Clerk: 4ity `Clerk (Signature) ( natur (8/13/91) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - -- --PAGE 60 FORM A NORTHAMPTON, MA _APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEME OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPRQVAL File five completed -forms -and plans and one mylar With the City Clerk the'- Planning Board in accordance With the requirements of Section 3.02. To the Planning — Board: — r The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property in the City of Northampton does not_cohstitute division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control.. Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is no required 1. Applicant l}&ro +rZr type name Signat 1 ennedy �R6 e Ln T • a arl M � y - . - --•+� Address Phone .+ 2. Owner same as applicatt Print or type name Signature Address _- - - - Phone 3. surveyor Emily B Holmberg Si natur Print or type name g 7 T)arnnn Pnn Rna ri (}icet crfi MA n, n1 Phone Address 4. Deed or property recorded in Hampshire County Registry, Book 1982 Page 'U7 (PorTi nn ) 5. Location and Description of Property: 3.000 Acres +/- on the east side of Kennedy Road, Leeds 6. Assessor's Map ID: 14 Date -Submitted-.f or--Planning _ _ __.__Date Planning Bo rd Board Approv 1: December 2 -9 -19�gjpecision Filed Ass ist a City Cler n - -- ' _ =- °City Clerk: _ _{ atur - Signature - (8/13/ - 91) - - -_ - = -= _ _ _ - - -- - - - - -- SUBDIVISION .REGULATIONS ------- PAGE 60 I V- City of Northampton, Massachusetts Office of Planning and Development City Hall • 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950 FAX (413) 586 -3726 • Community and Economic Development • Conservation • Historic Preservation • Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals • Northampton Parking Commission DECISION OF NORTHAMPTON PLANNING BOARD APPLICANT: Donald A. Chiulli ADDRESS: 163 Kennedy Road Northampton, MA 01060 OWNER: Donald A. Chiulli ADDRESS: 163 Kennedy Road Northampton, MA 01060 RE LAND OR BUILDINGS IN NORTHAMPTON AT: 163 Kennedy Road MAP AND PARCEL NUMBERS: MAP 14 PARCEL 7 & 8 At a meeting conducted on October 24, 1996, the Northampton Planning Board unanimously voted 7:0 to grant the request of Donald A. Chiulli for a SPECIAL PERMIT with Site Plan Approval under the provisions of Section 6.13 and 10.11 in the Northampton Zoning Ordinance, to create a flag lot at 163 Kennedy Road in accordance with the following plans: 1. "Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli," by Harold L. Eaton & Associates, Inc. dated March 18, 1996; 2. "SITE PLAN: Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli," by Harold L. Eaton & Associates, Inc. dated March 18, 1996; 3. "PROFILE PLAN: Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli," by Harold L. Eaton & Associates, Inc. dated March 18, 1996. Planning Board Members present and voting were: Chair Andrew J. Crystal, Vice Chair Daniel J. Yacuzzo, Jody Blatt, Nancy Duseau, Kenneth Jodrie, Anne Romano and Associate Member Paul Diemand. In Granting the Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for a flag lot, the Planning Board found: A. The requested use for a flag lot protects adjoining premises against seriously detrimental uses because it is a use ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER `I— allowed by Special Permit in a Rural Residential zoning district. B. The requested use will promote the convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets and minimize traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area because it will generate minimal additional traffic. C. The requested use will promote a harmonious relationship of structures and open spaces to the natural landscape, existing buildings and other community assets in the area because it will be in keeping with the residential character of the neighborhood. D. The requested use will not overload the City's resources because it calls for the addition of only one residential dwelling. Therefore, there is no need to mitigate adverse impacts. E. The requested use meets all special regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance under Section 6.13 and Section 10.11. (See Attachments A and B) F. The requested use bears a positive relationship to the public convenience or welfare because it provides additional housing. The use will not unduly impair the integrity of character of the district or adjoining zones because the proposed use is residential, and the property is located in a district zoned Rural Residential. The use will not be detrimental to the health, morals, or general welfare and shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance. G. The requested use will promote City planning objectives to the extent possible and will not adversely affect those objectives, as defined in City master or study plans adopted under M.G.L. Chapter 41, Section 81 -C and D. The Planning Board voted 7:0 to grant the waivers as requested. No conditions were imposed upon the project. 4+� ATTACHMENT A Section 6.13 Flaq Lots. In reviewing the application for a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval to create a flag lot, the Planning Board found the following: 1. The lot met the requirements of the Table of Dimensional and Density Regulations, Section 6.2. 2. The access roadway has no curve with a radius of less than eighty (80) feet. 3. The lot is laid out such that a circle with a diameter one and one -half (1 1/2) times the required frontage can be placed around the principal structure without any portion of said circle falling outside of the property's line. 4. Only one flag lot is being created, and it shall be served by a single driveway and curb cut. 5. The grade, length and location of access driveways are of suitable construction, in the opinion of the Planning Board, for the access and, where applicable, the turn - around for vehicles, including moving vans, ambulances, fire and police. Said driveways shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Approval Not Required Plans submitted to the Planning Board shall include the statement "Lot 2 is a Flag Lot: Building is Permitted Only in Accordance with the Special Flag Lot Provisions of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance. 7. The Special Permit application includes a plan showing the location and layout of the existing driveway and proposed house and provisions for drainage and storm water run -off. NOW ATTACHMENT B Site Plan Approval /Review Criteria Section 10.11 In conducting their Site Plan Review for the Special Permit with Site Plan Approval for a flag lot, the Planning Board found: A. The requested use for a flag lot protects adjoining premises against seriously detrimental uses because it is a use allowed by Special Permit in a Rural Residential zoning district. B. The requested use will promote the convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets and minimize traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area because it will generate minimal additional traffic. C. The requested use will promote a harmonious relationship of structures and open spaces to the natural landscape, existing buildings and other community assets in the area because it will be in keeping with the residential character of the neighborhood. D. The requested use will not overload the City's resources because it calls for the addition of only one residential dwelling. Therefore, there is no need to mitigate adverse impacts. E. The requested use meets all special regulations set forth in the zoning ordinance under Section 6.13 and Section 10.11. F. The project has provided for compliance with the Technical Performance Standards as listed below: 1. The curb cuts have been minimized because only one curb cut will be used. 2. Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic movement will be separated on the site by construction of a driveway. NOW ../ Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 11, no Special Permit, or any extension, modification or renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed after the decision has been filed, or if such an appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Hampshire County registry of Deeds or Land Court, as applicable and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for such recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. It is the owner or applicant's responsibility to pick up the certified decision from the City Clerk and record it at the Registry of Deeds. 'The Northampton Planning Board hereby certifies that a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval has been Granted and that copies of this decision and all plans referred to in it have been filed with the Planning Board and the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 15, notice is hereby given that this decision is filed with the Northampton City Clerk on the date below. If anyone wishes to appeal this action, an appeal must be filed pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17, with the Hampshire County Superior Court and notice of said appeal filed with the City Clerk within twenty days (20) of the date of that this decision was filed with the City Clerk. Applicant: Donald A. Chiulli - 163 Kennedy Road DECISION DATE: October 24 1996 DECISION FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK NoVGMt -e.r 21, 1996 l .� 1 `%.r -"001 City of Northampton, Massachusetts Office of Planning and Development City Hall • 210 Main Street Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586 -6950 FAX (413) 586 -3726 • Community and Economic Development • Conservation • Historic Preservation • Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals • Northampton Parking commission Northampton Planning Board Minutes of Meeting October 24, 1996 The Northampton Planning Board held a meeting on Thursday, October 24, 1996 Building, 7 . ldin , 212 Main Council Street, Northampton, Wallace Massachusetts. Municipal g, Present were Members: Chair Andrew J. Crystal, Vice Chair Daniel J. Yacuzzo, Jody Blatt, Kenneth Jodrie, Nancy Duseau, Anne Romano and Associate Member Paul Diemand. Staff: Senior Planner Paulette Kuzdeba and Board Secretary Laura Krutzler. At 7:01 p.m., Crystal opened the meeting. Minutes - Duseau moved to approve the minutes of August 22, 1996, September 12, 1996 and September 26, 1996 as presented. Blatt seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 7:0. At 7:04 p.m., Crystal opened the Public Hearing on a request from Donald A. Chiulli for a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval to create a flag lot in a RR District under Sections 6.13 and 10.11 (6) of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance for property located at 163 Kennedy Road, known as Assessor's Map #14, Parcels #7 and 8; and concurrently opened the Public Hearing on a request from Donald A. Chiulli for a Special Permit with Site Plan Approval to build a single family residence within 200 feet of a brook in a WSP District under Section 16.7 (1)(D) and 10.11 (6) of the Zoning Ordinance for property located at 163 Kennedy Road, known as Assessor's Map #14, Parcels 7 and 8. Crystal read the legal notice advertising the hearings. Crystal explained the procedure he would use in conducting the hearing. ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER N%WW I"'` John B. Howard, Esq. presented the application, accompanied by Donald A. Chiulli, Sharon Deyette and Don Miner of Harold Eaton & Associates. The applicant has submitted two applications for property located at 163 Kennedy Road: i) an application to create a flag lot for a single- family residence, and ii) an application for the construction of a residence within 200 feet of a brook in a WSP District. The property is located in a Rural Residential (RR) District and a Water Supply Protection Overlay District. The existing parcel is 14.5 acres and has 465 feet of frontage. A house, garage, barn and tennis court are presently located on the property. The applicant proposes to subdivide the land into two lots: the flag lot, which would contain the existing barn, and another lot which would have the house and garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) granted a dimensional Variance for the property in August of 1995. This Variance allowed the applicant to create a house lot with insufficient rear setbacks so that the barn could be located on the flag lot. The ZBA imposed the following conditions: ii) The property shall not be further subdivided once the flag lot is approved, ii) the property shall be used for residential purposes only, iii) the barn shall not be used as a residence and iv) approval is contingent on Planning Board approval of a Special Permit for a flag lot. Howard reviewed the application, stating how the the requested use meets the criteria for Flag Lot Special Permits. In particular, the flag lot: - - -- meets dimensional and density requirements because the lot is over twelve acres and has more than fifty feet of frontage. The minimum lot width is 56.96 feet, and the proposed house location is no closer than sixty feet to any property line. will be used for a single- family residence. - - -- will have a house located within a circle with a minimum diameter equal to 1 1/2 times the minimum frontage requirement, or 262.5 feet. - - -- has a driveway which has no curve with a radius of less than eighty feet. - - -- has a driveway with a grade of -1.0 % for 300 feet and a grade of +2.0% for the remaining length. A hammerhead turn - around will be located at the end of the drive. conforms to Subdivision Control regulations. The house may be located within two hundred feet of an intermittent stream which runs diagonally across the property from the northeast to the southwest. Therefore, the second application requests a , %W ...' Special Permit under Section 16.7. The house location has not yet been set, Howard said. However, the applicant will take measures to minimize disturbance to the site, and only one tree of any magnitude will be cut. In addition, the driveway will have swales to direct storm water run -off, and all areas disturbed by construction will be loamed and seeded. The applicant will install staked hay bales along the driveway and anywhere else soil excavation takes place. The lot meets additional dimensional and density requirements imposed by Section 16.9 for properties located within Water Supply Protection overlay districts. Howard reviewed the requested waivers: waiver of requirement that plan be to scale of 1" = 40' or greater (the site plan is at a scale of 1 to 100 waiver of requirement of showing building elevations and exterior entrances and exits (because the house is not yet designed); and waiver of the requirement of including proposed landscaping, since it is not yet determined. Don Miner displayed a plan of the lot and described existing features and the proposed locations of the house and driveway. The brook on the property is at 409 feet above sea level, while the highest knoll on site is 490 feet. All drainage on site flows toward the brook. Miner observed no standing water on the property when he visited the site earlier in the day, despite recent rainfall. An old farm road runs through the property, crossing the brook. The area is an open meadow which is becoming a wetland marsh, Miner said. The area between the proposed house and the brook is wooded. In constructing the driveway, engineers have tried to save an attractive chestnut tree at the road's entrance and not to disturb ledge outcropping, so the driveway snakes between the ledge and the tree. The driveway follows the property line and runs to a break in an old stone wall. Water drains toward the lowest point in the driveway near the tennis court. Test holes dug to 102 - 106 inches detected no ground water, Miner said. The applicant can not pinpoint an exact house location because he does not know where he may encounter ledge underneath the ground. Crystal asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or against the application. No one spoke. The applicant should submit final grading plans and a plan showing the final house location to the Building Inspector and Planning Department to become part of the file to demonstrate that setback requirements have been met, Kuzdeba said. Members and Kuzdeba asked questions, eliciting the following additional information: - - -- The owners plan to add a small amount of lawn area to what is already present. However, they will not treat the lawn with chemicals. - - -- The applicant may extend the driveway. The barn may be used for parking. Site Inspector Romano reported she had no concerns as a result of her visit to the site. Members discussed whether to require the applicant to return to the Board after determining the house location. The Board could grant the Special Permit with the condition that no work shall occur within one hundred feet of the stream, Kuzdeba suggested. If work were to occur within one hundred feet of the stream, the application would have to be amended. However, Blatt argued in favor of requiring the house to be located more than two hundred feet from the stream. There are many other places on the property where the house could be sited, Blatt pointed out. But, if the house were outside of the two - hundred -foot buffer, no Special Permit would be needed, Crystal pointed out. If work were proposed within one hundred feet of the stream, Conservation Commission approval would be necessary, Kuzdeba said. Yacuzzo and Duseau both said they felt comfortable approving the Special Permit and allowing the applicant to site the house within two hundred feet of the stream. Yacuzzo suggested that if the house is located between one hundred and two hundred feet of the stream, the applicant simply be required to submit plans to complete the file without additional Board review. Two hundred feet was an arbitrary distance picked by the Board, Duseau commented. The reason for the buffer is to prevent water contamination and to protect the recharge area, she said, and the applicant has addressed drainage issues. Duseau said she saw no potential for contamination of the brook. Chiulli said he does not plan to build until Spring. The ordinance seems to focus on industrial and commercial uses and does not seem aimed at single - family homes, Howard said. Clearing will be minimal, and measures will be taken to protect against run- off during construction, he added. The ordinance is aimed mainly at commercial uses, Kuzdeba agreed. Crystal asked why the applicant has requested a permit before knowing the house location? The applicant knew he may require a Special Permit, and the filing fee for two applications was the same as for one, Howard responded. Members continued to discuss how close to the stream to allow the applicant to build without requiring additional review. The applicant would be willing to accept a condition that he may not build within one hundred feet of the brook, Eaton said. If `� LMM anything, the house will probably be moved further from the brook to an elevated area where views are better. The Board could act on the flag lot Special Permit but continue the public hearing on the other application until the house location has been decided, Crystal suggested. This would be acceptable to the applicant, Howard said. Duseua moved to close the flag lot public hearing. Blatt seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 7:0. Duseau moved to continue the public hearing on the application for a Special Permit to build within two hundred feet of a brook in a WSP District to October 23, 1997 at 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Blatt seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 7:0. Duseau moved to grant the Special Permit for a flag lot with the waivers as requested because the applicant meets the criteria as outlined in the application. Blatt seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 7:0. V Type of Project: SPTE PLAN Al 2 3 4. Applicant's Name: Donald A. Chiulli Address: 163 Kennedy Rd. , Nor thamptolpelephone: S� Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # 14 Parcel # 7 & 8 Zoning District: RR—WSP StreetAddress Kennedy Rd. , North ampton Status of Applicant: X Owner, Contract Purchaser; Lessee Other (explain) Property Owner: Same Address: Telephone: 5. Describe Proposed Work/Project (Use additional sheets if necessary): Construct a Single Famil Residence on a Proposed Flag Lot House construction to be no closer than 100 feet of the brook. ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Has the following information been included in the application? Yes Site/Plot Plan Yes List of requested waivers Yes fee Yes 2 sets of labels (supplied by the Assessor's Office) Yes Signed dated and denied Zoning Permit Application Yes _ Three (3) copies of the Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office. "IiCF -.r►' ' 8. Site Plan and Special Permit Approval Criteria. (If any permit criteria does not apply, explain why) Use additional sheets if necessary. Assistance for completing this information is available through the Office of Planning & Development. A. How will the requested use protect adjoining premises against seriously detrimental uses? N/A How will the project provide for: surface water drainage: Disturbed Soil Around the Proposed House will be Planted with Grass. sound and sight buffers: House will be Constructed in Wooded Area of Par cel. the preservation of views, light and air. House will be Constructed in Wooded Area of Parcel Some trees will be Cut to Obtain Views of the Meadow. B. How will the requested use promote the convenience and safety of pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets? How will the project minimize traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area? Where is the location of driveway openings in relation to traffic and adjacent streets? N/A What features have been incorporated into the design to allow for: access by emergency vehicles: 14am,nPrhP ^a Type Tnrn— Armand at the End of th D riveway. the safe and convenient arrangement of parking and loading spaces: N/A provisions for persons with disabilities: N/ A 2 1.0 C. How will the proposed use promote a harmonious relationship of structures and open spaces to: the natural landscape: Minimal Cutting of Trees Around the Proposed Hou and Cutting Trees to Get View of Meadow. to existing buildings: Existing Barn on the Property to be Retained. other community assets in the area: N/A D. What measures are being taken that show the use will not overload the City's resources, including: water supply and distribution system: Private Well on Site . sanitary sewage and storm water collection and treatment systems: On Site Septic System- fire protection, streets and schools: N/A How will the proposed project mitigate any adverse impacts on the City's resources, as listed above? N /A E. List the section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance that states what special regulations are required for the proposed project (flag lot, common drive, lot size averaging, etc.) Section 16.0 Water Supply Protection District. How does the project meet the special requirements? (Use additional sheets if necessary)? See Attached ADDendix A. F. State how the project meets the following technical performance standards: 1. Curb cuts are minimized: Only One Driveway is Proposed. r 3 `✓ Check off all that apply to the project: N/A use of a common driveway for access to more than one business use of an existing side street use of a looped service road 2. Does the project require more than one driveway cut? X NO YES (if yes, explain why) 3. Are pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic separated on -site? YES X NO (if no, explain why) For projects that require Intermediate Site Plan Approval, - ONLY , sign application and end here. 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned owner (s) Planning Board permission to enter the property to review this application. Date: ( O ! C Applicants Signature: Date: Owner's Signature: (If not same as applicant) For projects that require a Special Permit or which are a major project, applicants must also complete the following page. 4 "Y E, J. Fi {, ../ F. Explain why the requested use will: not unduly impair the integrity or character of the district or adjoining zones: Single Family Residence is Allowed By Right — Section 5.0 Use Regulations — Page 5.2 not be detrimental to the health, morals or general welfare: N/A be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance: N/A G. Explain how the requested use will promote City planning objectives to the extent possible and will not adversely effect those objectives, defined in City master study plans (Open Space and Recreation Plan; Northampton State Hospital Rezoning Plan; and Downtown Northampton: Today, Tomorrow and the Future). N/A 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned owner(s) grant the Planning Board permission to enter the property to review this application. Date: (0 £ 6 Applicants Signature: �h Date: Owner's Signature: (If not the same as applicant's) MAJOR PROJECTS must also complete the following page: Ct FiG,E MASS. 01060 �. wD ' 5 Ct FiG,E MASS. 01060 , ..r , MAJOR PROJECT APPROVAL CRITERIA: Does the project incorporate 3 foot sumps into the storm water control system? YES NO (if no, explain why) Will the project discharge stormwater into the City's storm drainage system? YES NO IF NO, answer the following: Do the drainage calculations submitted demonstrate that the project has been designed so that there is no increase in peak flows from pre- to post - development conditions during the: 1, 2, or 10 year Soil Conservation Service design storm ? YES NO (if no, explain why) Will all the runoff from a 4110 inch rainstorm (first flush) be detained on -site for an average of 6 hours? YES NO (if no, explain why) Is the applicant requesting a reduction in the parking requirements? NO YES If yes, what steps have been taken to reduce the need for parking, and number of trips per day? 2 ti \..1 NEW SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS REQUEST FOR WAIVERS APPLICATION The application MUST include a site plan containing the information listed below. The Planning Board may waive the submission of any of the required information, if the Applicant submits this form with a written explanation on why a waiver would be appropriate. To request a waiver on any required information, circle the item number and fill in the reason for the request. Use additional sheets if necessary. A. Locus plan B. Site plan(s) at a scale of 1 11= or greater. Form "A" Plan to be at a Scale of 1" = 100' Due to Size of Property. B -1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of project, date and scale plans: B -2. Plan showing Location and boundaries of COU the adjacent streets or ways all properties and owners within 300 feet all zoning districts within 300 feet Existing and proposed: buildings_ setbacks from property lines building elevations Single Family Residence Design, not y et Selected by Applicant. all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans for all exterior facades structures are encouraged) B -4. Present & proposed use of the land buildings: B -5. Existing and proposed topography (for intermediate projects the permit granting authority may accept generalized topography instead of requiring contour lines): - at two foot contour intervals showing wetlands, streams, surface water bodies showing drainage swales and floodplains: showing unique natural land features r n� B-6. Location of: `"' NOW parking & loading areas public & private ways driveways, walkways access & egress points proposed surfacing: B -7. Location and description of - all stormwater drainage/detention facilities - water quality structures - public & private utilities/easements - sewage disposal facilities water supply facilities B -8 Existing & proposed: landscaping, trees and plantings (size & type of plantings) Single Family Residence — Not DPtPrmInPd at this TiMe. stone walls, buffers and/or fencing: B -9. Signs - existing and proposed: Location dimensions/height color and illumination B -10. Provisions for refuse removal, with facilities for screening of refuse when appropriate: FOR MAJOR PROJECTS ONLY: B -11. An erosion control plan and other measures taken to protect natural resources & water supplies: C. Estimated daily and peak hour vehicles trips generated by the proposed use, traffic patterns for vehicles and pedestrians showing adequate access to and from the site, and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site. Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared and stamped by a: Registered Architect, .A ' W Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer M t Appendix A Section 16.0 Water Supply Protection District Section 16.1 thru 16.5 are the Purpose & Uses and relate toward commercial and industrial development. This project is a single family house. Section 16.6 - Drainage - The proposed driveway will be gravel with swales directing and keeping storm drainage on site.At the house location all disturbed areas will be loamed and seeded. Section 16.7 Uses by Special Permit Item 1 -D. - Any construction within 200 feet of a watercourse requires a special permit. See also Section 16.9. Item 2 - The applicant proposes to install staked hay bales along the south property line, along the driveway, and along the downward side of any and all areas where soil excavation will take place. Section 16.8 - Design & Operations Guidelines - N/A Section 16.9 - Additional Dimensional & Density Regulations Item 1 - Minimum lot size is 80,000 S.F. & the proposed lots 12 Ac.+ . Item 2 - Maximum coverage of impervious will be less than 1 percent. Item 3 - Any alteration within 200 feet of any stream requires a special permit, thus this application. NOTE: The proposed house location may move,subject to final decision by applicant. � i QPT L L l( •...r CITY OF NORTHAMP'T'ON PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR: Vl� 1. Applicant's Name: Donald A. Chiulli Address: 163 Kennedy Rd, Northampto Telephone: 2. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # 14 Parcel # 7 & 8 Zoning District: RR — WSP Street Address: 163 Kennedy Road 3. Status of Applicant: X Owner, Contract Purchaser; Lessee Other (explain) 4. Property Owner: Same Address: Telephone: 5. Describe Proposed Work/Project (Use additional sheets if necessary): Create a Flag Lot for a Single Family Residence ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Has the following information been included in the application? Yes Site/Plot Plan Yes List of requested waivers Yes fee Yes 2 sets of labels (supplied by the Assessor's Office) Yes Signed dated and denied Zoning Permit Application T] ee (3) copies of the Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office. X °. � 3 X996 � - i rY VOMW "No 8. Site Plan and Special Permit Approval Criteria. (If any permit criteria does not apply, explain why) Use additional sheets if necessary. Assistance for completing this information is available through the Office of Planning & Development. A. How will the requested use protect adjoining premises against seriously detrimental uses? N/A How will the project provide for: surface water drainage: Drainage Swale Along the Driveway sound and sight buffers: N/A the preservation of views, light and air. N/A B. How will the requested use promote the convenience and safety of pedestrian movement within the site and on adjacent streets? N/A How will the project minimiz traffic impacts on the streets and roads in the area? N/A Where is the location of driveway openings in relation to traffic and adjacent streets? N/A What features have been incorporated into the design to allow for: access by emergency vehicles: Hammerhead Type Turn — Around at the End of Dr iveway the safe and convenient arrangement of parking and loading spaces: N/A provisions for persons with disabilities: N/A iJ L OCT 3 199 2 IF OFFICE r, n 100 ..►O C. How will the proposed use promote a harmonious relationship of structures and open spaces to: the natural landscape: Minimal Cutting of Trees Around the Proposed Hous and Cutting Trees to Get View of Meadow. to existing buildings: Existing Barn on the Property to be Retained. other community assets in the area: N/A D. What measures are being taken that show the use will not overload the City's resources, including: water supply and distribution system: Private Well on Site. sanitary sewage and storm water collection and treatment systems: On Site Septic System and Proposed Drainage Swales. fire protection, streets and schools: How will the proposed project mitigate any adverse impacts on the City's resources, as listed above? N/A E. List the section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance that states what special regulations are required for the proposed project (flag lot, common drive, lot size averaging, etc.) Section 6.13 Flag Lots How does the project meet the special requirements? (Use additional sheets if necessary)? See Attached — Appendix A F. State how the project meets the following technical performance standards: 1. Curb cuts are minimized: Only One Driveway is Proposed. CT GI (v I LERM:$ UFFfrE NORTHAMPTON MASS. ©1Q60 )hWM" lft� Check off all that apply to the project: N/A use of a common driveway for access to more than one business use of an existing side street use of a looped service road 2. Does the project require more than one driveway cut? X NO YES (if yes, explain why)_ 3. Are pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular trafc separated on -site? YES X NO (if no, explain why) N /A For projects that require Intermediate Site Plan Approval, ONLY , sign application and end here. 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my Grant knowledge. The undersigned owner (s) Planning Board permission to enter the property to review this application. Date: 10 16 Applicants Date: Owner's Signature: (If not same as applicant) For projects that require a Special Permit or which are a major project, applicants must also complete the following page. it 4 `r..r F. Explain why the requested use will: ../ not unduly impair the integrity or character of the district or adjoining zones:_ Single Family Residence is Allow By Right — Se ction 5.0 Use Regulations — Page 5.2 not be detrimental to the health, morals or general welfare: N/A be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance: N/A G. Explain how the requested use will promote City planning objectives to the extent possible and will not adversely effect those objectives, defined in City master study plans (Open Space and Recreation Plan; Northampton State Hospital Rezoning Plan; and Downtown Northampton: Today, Tomorrow and the Future). N/A 9. I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. The undersigned owner(s) grant the Planning Board permission to enter the property to review this application. Date: Io I f ` Applicants Date: Owner's Signature: (If not the same as applicant's) MAJOR PROJECTS must also complete the following page: L3 OCT . CITY CLERKS OFFICE ../ MAJOR PROJECT APPROVAL CRITERIA: Does the project incorporate 3 foot sumps into the storm water control system? YES NO (if no, explain why) Will the project discharge stormwater into the City's storm drainage system? YES NO IF NO, answer the following: Do the drainage calculations submitted demonstrate that the project has been designed so that there is no increase in peak flows from pre- to post - development conditions during the: 1, 2, or 10 year Soil Conservation Service design storm ? YES NO (if no, explain why) Will all the runoff from a 4110 inch rainstorm (first flush) be detained on -site for an average of 6 hours? YES NO (if no, explain why) Is the applicant requesting a reduction in the parking requirements? NO YES If yes, what steps have been taken to reduce the need for parking, and number of trips per day? 6 SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS REQUEST FOR WAIVERS APPLICATION ,moo The application MUST include a site plan containing the information listed below. The Planning Board may waive the submission of any of the required information, if the Applicant submits this form with a written explanation on why a waiver would be appropriate. To request a waiver on any required information, circle the item number and rill in the reason for the request. Use additional sheets if necessary. A. Locus plan IN.. Site plan(s) at a scale of 1 "=40' or greater. Form "A" Plan to be at a Scale of 1" = 100' B. ' D ue to Size of roperty. B -1. Name and address of the owner and the developer, name of project, date and scale plans: B -2. Plan showing Location and boundaries of - the adjacent streets or ways - all properties and owners within 300 feet all zoning districts within 300 feet Existing and proposed: buildings setbacks from property lines building elevations Single Family Residence Design, not yet Selected by Applicant. all exterior entrances and exits (elevation plans for all exterior facades structures are encouraged) B -4. Present & proposed use of the land buildings: B -S. Existing and proposed topography (for intermediate projects the permit granting authority may accept generalized topography instead of requiring contour lines): at two foot contour intervals showing wetlands, streams, surface water bodies showing drainage swales and floodplains: showing unique natural land features 7 „_,_,_d�JttttiA�tiPT�fy NI,ASS�t7i(Io0 B -6. Location of ../ parking & loading areas - public & private ways - driveways, walkways access & egress points proposed surfacing: B -7. Location and description of all stotmwater drainage/detention facilities water quality structures public & private utilities/easements sewage disposal facilities water supply facilities Existing & proposed: landscaping, trees and plantings (size & type of plantings) Single Family Residence — Not Determined at this Time. - stone walls, buffers and/or fencing: B -9. Signs - existing and proposed: Location - dimensions/height color and illumination B -10. Provisions for refuse removal, with facilities for screening of refuse when appropriate: FOR MAJOR PROJECTS ONLY: B -11. An erosion control plan and other measures taken to protect natural resources & water supplies: C. Estimated daily and peak hour vehicles trips generated by the proposed use, traffic patterns for vehicles and pedestrians showing adequate access to and from the site, and adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site. Site Plans submitted for major projects shall be prepared and stamped by a: Re istered Architect, Landscape Architect, or Professional Engineer .1 7 ""�-" '"'t t 8 t' iH ? U1QaQ Appendix A Section 6.13 Flag Lots The Lot Will be Used for a Single Family Residence. ../ 1. The proposed lot will have 12± acres, far in excess of the 80,0000 S.F. minimum. The 50 foot wide access strip will have frontage of 56.96 feet, and the proposed house will be no closer than 60 feet to any property line. 2. The access driveway will not have a curve radius of less than 80 feet. 3. The proposed house location will be within a circle with a minimum diameter equal to 1 1/2 times the minimum frontage requirement or a circle with a diameter of 262.5 feet. 4. Only one flag lot is proposed with no provision to any additional lots. 5. The driveway will be gravel construction, sloping down from Kennedy Road with a grade of -1.0 % for approximately 300 feet, then transition to a gentle increase in grade with +2.0 % for approximately 200 feet. A hammerhead turn - around is proposed at the end of the driveway. 6. The plans submitted are in accordance with the Subdivision Control Law. 7. Drainage swales are provided along the driveway, directing run off in an easterly direction, all on our property. Oate Filed File No. ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION ( §].0.2) 1 • Name of Applicant Donald A. Chiulli Address 163 Kennedy Road, Leeds, MA Telephone: 2. Owner of Property: Same Telephone: 3. Status of Applicant: x Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee Other (explain 4. Parcel Identification: zoning Map Sheet / Pa celkq 7f-8 zoning District(s) (include overt s) 4 0 S Street Address 5. Fill (volume & location) Lot size Frontage. Floor Area Ratio aOpen Space (Lot area ni: building and parking) Parking Spaces Loading Signs Use of Structure /Property (if project is only inter Building height aB1dg.Coverage (Footpri Setbacks - front - side - rear Existin Pro osed Required b Zonin Residential Same NMT: 2 for work, skip to /{6) n a n a t)LT 0% 1 LT 8 1 + 1 L: �+ 12: 1+ 1000'± 1) L: - R: 100 2) 1+ 600'± E 1) 50 2) 1 81 cr s 1 80 000 2 1 12.744A± 1 80 000 e 1 nus 0% 0 0 00 ach 50' 6. Narrative Description of Proposed work /Project: (Use additional sheets if necessary) A licant wishes to create a flag lot for construction of a new single- 77 family residence and to include the existing barn and tennis court proposed item 2 above; App licant wishes to create a lot encompassing the existing house (item 1 above) in full com liance with Zoning Ordinance except for insufficient lot depth in area between existir. house and the barn (See Preliminary Plan). 7. Attached Plans: x Sketch Plan Site Plan "Preliminar Plan of Land in Northampton, Massachusetts Prepared for Donald A. Chiulli" 8. Certification: I hereby certify that the information contained herein is true' and accurate to the best of my knowl e. Date: (3 `j Sr / Applicant's Signature: Ltil THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYS 1ZQnA1� A,, ,Qhi - Approved as presented /based on information presented v�9,jr.vc - �- Z. = Aenied as presented -- Reason: Special' Permit and /or Site Plan Required: Finding Required: _ Variance Required: S gnature of B i ding Inspector 4t e NOTE tuuanco of a zoning ponnh does not refloye an appllcont's burden to comply wigs ail zoning roqul(omonts and obtain all foqulrod pormKs from (ho Booed of Hoolth, Consorvallon CommlWon, Dopoltmont of Public Works and otilor appiicablo pormh granting avihoritios. /c T)- L , e fi r-. • r .^ i r� � r L , e fi r-. • r .^ i r� � r N JUDITH R. LOCrOCO & EN ACE J. LOCOCO JR. BOOK 2998, PAGE 284 PLAN BOOK P2, PAGE 9 BOOK 4611, PAGE 230 PLAN BOOK 178, PAGE 35 O i �T ti 1p) 39. £ N 492675.73 S � S E 270217.31 12 0. 6 8�' to 69 ' r to A, THE PROPERTY SHOWN H €RERON, COMPRISING IS SUBJECT TO A VARIANCE OF LOT 1 do 2, � � F UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 6.2 IN THE 69 N 492508.47 NORTHAMPTON ZONING ORDINANC €, TO ALLOW THE 9 0' E 270165.82 CREATION OF A NEW LOT WITH INSUFFICIENT LOT ' 0 6� DEPTH. THE VARIANCE IS DATED OCTOBER 6, 1995: SEE BOOK 4820, PAGE 292. I LOT 2 IS A FLAG LOT: SUILDINX IS PERMITTED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLAG LOT PROVISIONS OF THE NORTHAMPTON ZONING ORDINANCE. APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED PLANNING BOARD NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS 7� s Q o �� g APPROVAL NL)T s • Vi a.; JAN 0 9 1997 DA TE: I � S8 1 ' 02 ',50- 1 242.62 0 LAND OP DONALD A. CHIULLI o HtULU ?�- 12,725 A a o o LAND OF DONALD A. C 4b 4, 80,074 SO. FT.f 4 4 TO BE APPROVED AS A FLAG LOT 1.838 ACRES v ! --'r "- 5' E �� PROPOSED HOUSE LOCATi�! 53 5 I 60.03 , CIRCLE WITH .DIAMETER OF 262.5' /4 20.0' 01Y. Z N 492045.79 BARN ry #1 63 TENNIS E 270525.03 IQ" � CP ' COURT �j GARAGE / 4� 0% l 15 2.56 9 Sgt 34 241. —f S N 49189 ,9 9.74 j � E 269302.15 N JOHN SARAFIN, JOAN C. SARAFIN & ELLA J. CLAPP BOOK 2568, PAGE 132 PLAN BOOK 179, PAGE 68 LEGEND 0 I.P. FOUND I.P. TO BE SET i STONE BOUND FOUND A UNMARKED POINT E OVERHEAD UTILITIES 1 REPORT THAT THIS PLAN HAS B EEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE 1976 RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. � r RANDALL E. IZER #35032 S s� . x F Q � 46 „� JEFFREY D. do DIANA M. GORDON BOOK 3285, PAGE 318, _ RANDALL G � E. IZ 0350 C7�0 Su E� O LOCUS FIEF ERENCE & LOCATION _ DONALD A. CHIULLI BOOK 4611, PAGE 178 PLAN BOOK 66, PAGE 19 PLAN BOOK 58, PAGE 49 163 KENNEDY ROAD NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS PLAN OF LAND IN NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSSETTS PREPARED FOR DONALD A. CHIULLI SALE: 1 "= 100' MARCH 18, 1996 HAROLD L EATON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 235 RUSSELL STREET — HADLEY — MASSACHUSETTS 100 0 100 200 300 400 FEET X r M� Q Z 00 Qo p U tY ui 2 ned I,I nr. --) � Digitized / �� T Checked N Scanned 3 t Digitized - E- Checked BE SET ll� • Q Q � 0 0 � CA • N o Ll/ Q C IS "OVA K DOUCPkDFF d` t� �� z` t �, �, „� p L E I�OY S. W ti �` N L �o m d sUZAAJ/l1 E M. OEL CP PAGE 180 0 o � �� r � � �/ sEE � BO�� Z 19 2 T` �I� a ?-�� o�v RES ERVED FOR REGISTERS USE ONLY sZ �� z � w el l 0 n o l�, I I 1 MAP G , IZ "�! I�tJUA81 TAll1T - S OF 774F LkMJD. m 120. Z3 CITY OF A OE7�A MPT ) o 91� ti E f 42 � 14 0 SEE 800 987 PAG - p � -�' � �. ,� � /* C PA R CE � d tn 2 � � w� (� Cn � 5 0 5 G, � � r FEAAJK B. MOMTA S U E $ MAkiDJ I/J. MDJTAGUE .SEE . WOK 1151- PAGE 2S3 7 1 I�TE- SET BASE - ?U'OAY- COR. 810 I / 2 "X4 "FS3. FOUIIID UP IZ'' ctm6e) 1, �"QE- &D SET /Al PILE OF STOMES FOUIUD. w �� - 50" LOCUS TITLE REFEKENCE TONAJ ..SAGA FW d JDAA1 C. SAKAFIAI SEE BOOK L5G8 - PAGE f32 AM IES 7D LOTS 111 4 1B OkJM OF WESTH AM P TOAl MASSAC H USE77-5 PLAAIAI )MG 30AU AfffOVAL NOT REQUIRED UNDEI, 1�2 „aE PAD SET BASE N' 14CM. STUMP I'UT 2ykl FEAAk B. MOAUTAGLJE d 4cr APPROVAL 1 Y �; 7 /rlA l� IOIU L . IAOIUT 6L)E NOT SEE . BOOK 1151 PAGE 253 aEQUIitE D TRA CT 4- 4. w SEP 1 4 In yi” RE90D SET 3A - S E 12) "eA I& Ca R. oid b Y) C V 7 7 D C 0 FEET ZD0 IlIE7EES 56 0 50 10D PAUSTIIUE NkJAL!CK 4 AMELIA K. ZA0AL ICK SEE : BOOK 1012 - PA GE 71 8001 185Co -- PAGE 287 421SAA1 M. CODA,2D t LAUEEAICE A. 60DACD, JOE. SEE BOOk 4113- PAGE 55 GLAA/ BWe /75 PAGE 150 LOT 2 AS APPLIES 70 L07.S 2 43: / EEPD2T THAT 7 SNOWS THE P,20PE,2TY L /,VES OF EXIST /illC OWiVE,2SN 1P9 .4VD TLIE LlA/ES OF ,ST2EErs AkJD WAYS JNOWAI AeE TXILISE DF PUBLIC 09 P,CIVATE ST,eEETS D,C WAYS AL2EADY ESTABL /SHED AND 71-1 ND NEW LlA/ES FDe DlV /3/DAI DF EX /.STI.I/6 OWA/E.eSN /P OK. AIEW WAYS EE SND aarE� A,�wsj 2�J�95 AIIJGE L D J VA CC14ELLI BAfBAZR 14. VACCMELLI I � SEE = $DIdK 4273 � PftGE 24,0 I fEI THAT THIS PLAN AND � Blk! - DBL. SURVEY CONFORMS TO THE TECHNICAL 12 "13L. BIR. AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . 6� vq 395 Q cYj h 1 ICM T THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE -� X83 - =38 " RULES AND REGULATIONS of THE COQ. B/ ��2" R I SST REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE c COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. RAIUK B. MOIUTAGUE (I MAID 1aJ kl. MaIUTA GO SEE: 800t 1151 - FAC3E Z53 TRACT 2 LA MD IIU 1d. F. 0H ITE FIELD WORK kiESTUAMP70AI * I D. T. HUktTlEY MASSMASSACHUSETTS D . T N ' J M I -i SURVEYED FOE K ,D T NU�tITlEY M14M SWARM JDAV C. SARAFfiU LE I V I = zw' 2, 199s J. CLAPP AU6L)sT EL LA DATE= Q`s of 4.6,A ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. DAVID ` SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS r T• / USTFIAL DELVE EAST HUNTLEY � 3D IIID #35401 NORTHAMPTON, MASS. �fEss lgNO SUP�E� � _ 3 70 8 IL -02D 95 ET; 1 �I ILI_�11� 4 Ll Checked 1� �V) ( O to v % -sz G MWY.-S, J�P. 4 i STILLMAAI X)AI WE C. BEWES �o SEE: BODr- 2214 PA GE 3Z1 1 h I.PTD Q� � BESET �4e. O o� SPIe IA1 G Vr Ho USE a �N4 -' 4 � '/Z "2EE- ROD Li tz N SET IAJ PILE V , � 4 O 1 E y OF .STDAJES ;� r ` 5a 41 O SEE SIDE ET 3 OF 3 LO sA, 2 dt 1C. SU&TECT TO EASEMEAIT TO AMEEI TEL-EPAOUE t TELEGRAPH CDMPAlY of MASSACHUSETTS. SEE : $ 0010 847- - PAGE 521. �c 179.53 A CR /UDT A BUI LDA LOr ,13• �}$ - 2a , ��E�S i FDUIUD. Q � 0 40:z) 4 ki 04a `� EOkrAE1ZLY kNOLIM AS A MAME AD" 1. P. TO BE 2 �� b� 9 c y � AA1 AIVC IEA1T JAY MO RECOICD OF 'SET LAN v o� o Q A CCEPTAAlCE. ABAMD&J 1�EU oR BASE 14 - 0� ��o u, DISCONT /IVUAAICE FOUND. SUBJECT MEN. � "� 1 v i TO R 16MTJ 7D OTI- E'R5 AS "THEY J � �' MAY EX IST. _4 '3j D5 "W W14. BIE. 109.0 / I �aAK MOP. 2 = 39 "E 10 &.94 2l0 7. 8¢ A CUES o c �i 9,t 3 "I,P s049 PEES E. Mo ITAGUE 4 fy�1- TOTAL �, tW " . MANY P. M0�1 TAG UE I B 0Ae ND T Q BLJIL Dl/UG LD T a P011UT -190 42 s ss w O o tt PoAD 209 192 3 PAGE 5L . , O 203. & 2 AMES * O � � i ' t / SEE- BOOK 1108 ' �Q A1B5.45 -14 • G7 C7�eAcT r ,`� IN Y153TiyAMPTOv � � � � � , � � �. � � � � -�5 -47•kl h mm� zz� �►w- 219. 234dt A S �o , � o 14 °Ak Alb .4 45UILDIAI6 z vv La r w le- ceE3 ± o 1 1A1 /UDeT11AMPTO It a v . STILLMAki G. BOOK 5 4 " JDAMUE E BWOE5 c I V Nei SEE: BLOOK 1492 PA GE 4&4- I2 u ti BOOK 166 - M6F 109 `' �h W &P F CUAJ AJlIU LsHAM 4 . Lu 8 � P TO NAW1 T TE M. CIJAJAJIAI914AM Q 9 y _ 18 PILE �ti � Tn BE SET SEE � a0 L Z077 -• PA (3 E 21 � _� � `� � 1 IU48-37-Z3 E �DEI;D LAID_OLIT' � JDAA.I C. SA�A1= /lU �,�> >, ( 1. I 425.00 � . � � � Z s13 -sz, 4 ,v ,TONIU SAGA Fill! ' S87 44 28 "kJ 147. Zs . � I.P. W l°u � AIDI-44 - � � E SEE• Wd k 2916 -- PAGE 99 i Be SET BE SET tq I "I a Zo ?Z3, 7.°Xo' . PLAAIBOOZ 144 -- PA6E 39 �q I , �� , 1 IP- uP / i , I , LDRUME CLAPP,DKEEFE �- I.P. 1tZ I P. ,UP4 PE FZD F PM ' kE V11U Q XEE FE (!P (." � . _ Z I(o.(�3' -. �4`xt2 "Fs8 =�. RQAD•sT0111E I BE SET ti 203. I _ " 1: IL „ SEE: B DOX 3831 - PAGE 3 _ PLAIN 6Y 144 PAGE 39 • 783 Z'!6E ,USS�4 ? =50 "E -S '� A188 -11 -DIE - 'lG-¢SE s .5103 - 2410+ E ,I�ZS: - Z34.19 ' ZD3.20 =. _ 190 , '► I. t' T SET 549.89 W- SIT 1us8= D�=1L'E 10.14 4 r ' Hk]y BND ,3p L, TIE CQUIZSE Z13.34 TDTJ4L PO Im T 3 3 CuE E D o = � � CAL) ' 000 34 �! CT')' N .SG3 - dl - E � LAID OUT 50' k11DE 99.1L' BY TN I S SURVEY S1o0�38 =02;'12 •. �� , $ 56.3Lo © Ca m , O F ® p 2o.4d -1116� 29.57 AUESt W 11.40 AGES± : 2� -� s57= 4�•'o 11 MICHAEL J. DIZIA1S d ::2 CTnTA L AkEA �, b 3 p0 �B Z BB.SZ C'l- lA�LEEJU L. GO,�h1A 45 CBY DI I - Cw A102THAMPTDAJ) ° 32� Blw -10 VO SEE: BOOK 32-40 PAGE' 339 uAp SUBJECT TD EASE MEAD .� vTd AtA ERI CAA1 �'�b, °J` SB3�dG�3� "E ® °1 ZZ 7.534 AGES t C im WETHAMPTOU yZ" EE POD SCT O F BASE IS'DAK Coe. 8/0 N + "TtEP14aUE k TEL.EGR.APk4 M COM PANY OF S �D,��b - 224 � 12092 �r AJ87=15'38 "E G= 18.11 AGES _ MASSA CIOUsETT -S �' .� �b �� , �` 119.39 BI id -& 69.45' C IAU kJeMA 1A P'TOIU) -SEE: B60 1C 847 - PAGE 521. .,�! �� . fJ yid yF ��_12 • OAK o A MAP. C8Y DIGITIZES ti. ?f"P/ME •6 , F T IELD G cC�Pp 555=47-45 k1 5 �l�d -2D" kC 110E Sy THIS S 33 . I58 35 �''� a� PuUE �� , N�Z 32 5' n 1. P TD ti P ,� , LP. ,� ,off Q� �I SBS - I7-47 E o" s81 -IZ- 05 E BE SET �''�� o� �,b� sl►� -la" S S SG9=4S'd3 "E 217.9 ., 3 159. ^1�' �� 93.46 4i +a 3 „ 001 M - 56 3' 55 - 47-45 E • 1 M 22L7 ' � AJ57' Z4 -Z7 lc1 a � � -� �. I/-/- 57 � Q 97.4 Z BE S�t'� I- LZ9AllEL f. PEP1Al 4 � s43 - IG �� -3 PIS 73.95 ¢� 3 J40 Tyl PE TIE iffiRSE : 102.54' SEE- BOOK 3251 -- PA GE 205 ,Lill = Q8 58'12 - 50. GO' PLAM886k 143 PA GE 56 54.04' - C CDT () MCP ,; UP12" o a a u c 0 a DETA IL M , 1 „_ 40' i - •50. � I _ AJ3 = G -IG "kJ �� v Q 2,90 SD. FT. ± (Al k1ESTHAMPrnIU) W O n x,19 LE�OY S . Di9X 14k I SLZAIU E M. 0EL CN SEE: BOOt 2 192 --- PAGE ISO 15/9.14 TQT�4 LL N ti I PETEE L. - COMP UTATIO NS: Un1 TLEY D.T. IAIJIU DR AFTING: J. az s) o .SEE= 30010 1599- PAGE 184 ,51JKVEYED F02 J014AJ W T0AA1 C. SARARM 0' I" = 2�0' DATE AUGUST Z, 1995 ELU Z. CLAPP a� DAVID HUNTLU #35401 a� ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. a ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 36 IAIDUSTEIAL DKIVE EAST NORTHAMPTON, MASS. JM8 IL -a26 -95 �o M 0 SUR`s N !� I S - 58=53 cot 810 S84 � a4 � �`E ¢ lt� 0 10 " MAP - s89. Sp caP. s�� 3 G9.aG' -. t%j a EAYMDAJD F CATJOSr O 4 a MAkTPA E_ CATUOGIUD SEE: WOK 2420 -- PA 6E 17 .513 - 45 = 251J 1.5 MAP PLAIUBODK t Zle -- PAGE Z8 /50-05 C PA PC EL 1) UP LIZ'' S09t 11' -eG "kJ 1 "IP.-03" 144.I$ 1A1 S TaAlE 5 - NOTE: BOOx 88-- PAGE 15 1;ESEFVEJ 8/vi 1 5 OX G EmS OF LAND 014104 24 "'Hick. ARE NOT 1AITENDED - 08E CNVEYED... AS T46 SELOU - 0 ; , MALE L. TAYLDE , ,Tip 4 ti ti TIDE W IDOW A'Of IA1 A RQOT HAVING , _n SEEA1 RESEEVED I:IR COVII YEJIJIEAICE �, EUM C. TA OF & ATU." EXACT L.00ATIDAI , h SEE BOOK 2449 - PAGE 295 - PkESEW UA1D M9JA1AIABL �, �, PLAMBDOK IZ( - 04612 28 OWAIEZ A DT DE7ECMAJE'D. C PgJ�CEL Z) _ 4 I.P UP )25. 1 O 3 4.07' S23 . 39 =29 "kJ 1 87.310' Blw EEG. VJ -� /lJ310 -37�Dd ft _ 153.7b.. _ 276. �� 14-"aA1C d�= 02=15' 25 _ n EIvD BEG. ti8 33�G s /kl S(IU UP 3'' CITY OF I110ETPAM PTOLI WATEUJO KKS SEE.' BOOK 831 � PAGE 175 PLA111BOOK 10 - PAGE 5J RESERVED FOR REGISTERS USE ONLY 61 0 Q Lo 4 w� LOCUS TITLE REFE10ENCE J014M SAS RAJ I IDAIV C. SA M FIM SEE: 100k 25L9- PAGE 13Z APPLI E,5 TD L073 ,e & 3 : / fEPD ,eT THA T TPI,3 PL4AJ SHOWS TILE PEDPEeTY L IAJES DF EXI,STIAJG OWiVEeS/ 1p3 ARID T1IE LIMES DF STBEETJ AAJD WA Y5 SNOWAJ ARE Ti -IOSE DF PUBLIC DE PBI VA TE JTBEETS D.e WAYS AL,EEADY 56TABL/614ED AVD T14A T AID NEW LlAIES FDR D /VISIDAI AOF E'X /STIA16 DWiUEeSHIP DA AIEW WAYS AEE �- O PL.s. DATE: A &w T" Igq.5 Q WANE G_ TNIBAOLT FF.-ALICE'S LUCES M. TNIBAULT /AJNA B I TA AJ Ts DF THE q SEE 800I` 158 PAGE 738 CITY OF AJDETMA MPZL •� SEE BOOK 987-• PACE E 1242 .a (TieACT I) h I I kERMT THAT THIS PLAN AND I.P. TO it SB5 41 "E BESET � 5-55.OQ DEED 1111111111111111111111111111 7 ID OUT . &,!!A W m � C\j 252.284 ACRESt a (TOTAL AREA) SUBJECT TO EASEMEAIT TO AMEkICAA1 l'LLEPUOAIEd "IELEGUPN COMPAAIY of MNSSACNUSETTS. � .SEE: BOaK 847 PAGE 521. BIW• SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 �a °oaK REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MA ACHUSETTS . 1 SIGNED: ' DATE A 2&:w l 5 APPL /EIS TD 1-D73 1A b !B 7DWiU AF WES7NAMPTDN, MASSAL'NLISETTS SUB VQ �l ,� � ,(.IIJJ,edLL1J WS. �4U /ZED U,UGL�2 � A 200 100 D !Od ZOD 3L�, FEET METEe_S 50 D SO IDO LAUD 1111 klESTNAM PTOAJ 4 I11of T14AM P'TDII� MASSAC141JSETTS ICJ. F. JJH I T12 FIELD WORK- COMP UTATIO NS: Un1 TLEY D.T. IAIJIU DR AFTING: J. C HEC KED. D. T 40J TIE Y ,51JKVEYED F02 J014AJ W T0AA1 C. SARARM 0' I" = 2�0' DATE AUGUST Z, 1995 ELU Z. CLAPP a� DAVID HUNTLU #35401 a� ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. a ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 36 IAIDUSTEIAL DKIVE EAST NORTHAMPTON, MASS. JM8 IL -a26 -95 SHEET. 2 OF: 3 __j 0 SUR`s Ulgitized Checked SURVEY CONFORMS TO THE TECHNICAL I.P_TD AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR HE SET THE PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . 112EPOU THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE � /7= 23 tw- 5 BEEIJ - 1 - � � 1.P. - Z BE i j S-ET: » ID" STILLMAL G. BEOOLS., JE. �$ JOAA1 A JE C. MOXS SEE= 560X 2214- PAGE 321 Lp, 7D BE SL7 1189. avow � �_�� k oODS ROAD 0 Z ALO h�v � Q f' L P. TD BE SET - SUBJECT TO A 16. 01DE PIGNT OF - klAY JAI FA V01` OF -MLL M AAJ G. BCOOYS. SR- � ,TMAI UE C. BWoKS. .SEE' 3001.- 180-7- PAGE 201. 7bGETl-I EIS 0/774 SPr IN G Zl GNTS AS DES CzIf5 ED IN BOOK S37%. PA&E 176. QCC 7 �kl,U L I PA JAL OjEo (W�5 88 . TpT A L �ti W S T A MPTDiI/ i 0 N S !C 179.53 A eEE -t NOT A BUILD /AlG LD T �1.IIL= as'�z SIDNEY A. MOLTAGUE 4 13399 OUSE P M0AJTA62UE , UIDT 44-36 SEE 600K 14-19 PAGE 4�9 (TRACT 3 ) 4` MAP. - 24 "MAP. •ZZ B�j -14" Y. 819. L LOTS IA. 1B d 1C. : IN smMES SUBJEC' TO EASEMENT TO AlIAMICAN TELE'rNA►V E 4 "TELEGRAPH COMPAMY OF Arf 0XIMATE FR11PEKTY LIMES � I MAZA N L)SETTS. AS SNOkIN 01U A FL AAII FDI< Lu SEE .-.BOOK 847 - PAGE 521. LEIGH klAMEK. DATEp � 1/0779 PKOPEM CLAIMED BY R a lU ACCEPTANCE, ABAVXWMEM UST tNI SARAFIAI 4 CLAPP D ISCOKITIAILMI CE FOUND. � IT IS fECOMMENI)ED 714AT BOUNDARY AGREEMENTS BETWE'EAI ABUTTOI�S 1. � _ I" LP.- ._ 6 I"E = I "LP. ' SE ZECDIZDED. OUP 337 9' — UP Iz FoUA1D 1 o LROIAM17T ' O Oq 1 II' L 4"FSB -UP 12" MARCH Z3► 1979 AIUD EP14P.F0 91 HERITAGE SURVEMP SDUT74AMMAJ MASS. PLAN IS Ulu CECORDED. M SAID � v u- -- T C/ OF DES gM p7� � 1 - UPS " uPS /U ND I MEIN DIA Al OF PLANBW 143 PAGE 5(o. klELS S. CNEISTIUSOAI M44 =MtM3 SEE' 8D0K 3071 PAGE No I(oB.35' PLAMBOOk 172 -- PAGE ID8. B1tc1 �� 4ohDA k � S /lu 4 Bl pct Bhvd- 14 43 E �3 BEECq /� SASH 38Z 8� SET- EUD �. BEECH STZI MPP 4 801 E SST- IA1T. Slw 4 -Bl ;j IB 2(o 7.84 A CeEC TJTAL 4 "FSS -UP4' hu STOMES oPrA i 4 APPLIES ?D LOTS 2 0 3 KEP)KT T14R7 714IS PLAA1 SHOOS 774E PIeOPEKTY LIMES OFEXISTlAIG OIrJNEfSPIPS AND 7NE LINES OF STKEETS OK YJAYS SHOYJN ASE THOSE OF PUBLIC 0JZ PKIVRTE .STREETS O121rlAYS ALfzEFIDY ESTABUSFIED AND TNRT Na NEW LINES FOR THED IVISIOAI OF EXIST /A1& 0klAIEPSNIP DP. F6R NEYJ kWY SAZE S HOLJAI. SIGNED " IJ L -� -DfrTE ��cs�sr 2. 195 END Slk! 922 , - �s 1 Z�39'3 9 ^ PETER L. DEEZE .SEE: BOOk 1589 - PALE 184 00 M 00 N M LD Z Z 0: QEG. S1kI _ ,363 F69MEI:LY &00M AS NAFBL.E ROAD" C-3 h �o N o N h ° 4&. /a AceES t X tioerNAMPranJ IO /5978¢ ' `� �7¢ �t I" LP-UPL" �LDiU� FDUIUD Z "I.P. FOUND 3/4 -U JAI STORIES F' ,0UAID BEUSNIEE ELECTEIC CABLE CO. SEE: 8001 145(0 - PAGE 534 PLANB 132-- PAGE45 "ate. sIV-1 ZOd IO D D IDD ZW 3DID FEET METE I:S 50 D so 100 TPOMAS J. 3JOA M I LE SEE-' 800e 4312 PAGE 144 L Cq Q I /2"I.P FaUUD �U N psc 4"c" ZD" BEECH _IAaT. BIk1%s, RESERVED FOR REGISTERS USE ONLY LOCUS TITLE RE FER EAICE JOHM -SPU 1U 4 JoAAu C. SAS AFJN SEE -- B00k ZJL8 - PA GE 132 C NAISLES SCI' IOW klAMEE SEE' BOOK M%- M C-k 2 94- N AMT) 13WK 22D4 PAGE 300 N4. IMT) 0AZUE LXIS JAIUOF SEE = 800K 2204 - PAGE e% N INT) BO OK ZZD4 -- PA 296 (1V4 WT) APPUE3 TO LD T.S lA 1 LB T.3 PLA�/iU1�IG 7 DF WESTNAMPTX MMSANUSET BMW APPROV A AIDT REDUIBED 11A1DER ,sUeDivise Al AIr L LAWS DATE klELS L. CgE ISTEAI SOb SEE: 800r- Ito 25 - PAGE 256 I ItEPOC7 THAT THIS PLAN AND SURVEY CONFORMS TO THE TECHNICAL AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . I R-M ZT THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASS CHUSETTS . SIGNED: I DATE: LAIUD IA.1 W.F. WHITE Fl RK kiiE 4 AlORT14AM PTOU D T, i IUTC.EY MASSA C POSET TS D. T N I y UTLEY s SURVEYED FDA 2ICK D T NUAITGEY JD14U s jM4AJ C. SARA FIAJ d K8LE , It = 2On AUGUST 2, I X95 EL L A J. CL A PP T s yr 1 t� tH of SAS ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. a ASSOCIATES, INC. DAVID' SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS T. AST HUNTLEY 30 INDUSTEIAL DRIVE E � #35401 NORTHAMPTON, MASS. �FESS�� R � EV JDB'l lG -OZD- 95 13KE 3 3 I LI L.AJ. ItIL_t;u _ Checked — I"I.P. F?0U1UD j ��\ TIE CDU,P�'E Drt/L Y .N v m� I VzTEWD SET BEG. 1311 '39�, AN ANCI EAI T JAY- ND rECD RD of lU ACCEPTANCE, ABAVXWMEM UST tNI D ISCOKITIAILMI CE FOUND. TD P I GNTS TO 0734EPS AS TWEY .� MAY EXIST. p �0 o LROIAM17T ' O 1 II' moo UZTE E I SET IsnA1ES 3/4 " P T FouA10 U�S'E �� D� ID UAID. Q 49 -5�„ E 141 C-3 h �o N o N h ° 4&. /a AceES t X tioerNAMPranJ IO /5978¢ ' `� �7¢ �t I" LP-UPL" �LDiU� FDUIUD Z "I.P. FOUND 3/4 -U JAI STORIES F' ,0UAID BEUSNIEE ELECTEIC CABLE CO. SEE: 8001 145(0 - PAGE 534 PLANB 132-- PAGE45 "ate. sIV-1 ZOd IO D D IDD ZW 3DID FEET METE I:S 50 D so 100 TPOMAS J. 3JOA M I LE SEE-' 800e 4312 PAGE 144 L Cq Q I /2"I.P FaUUD �U N psc 4"c" ZD" BEECH _IAaT. BIk1%s, RESERVED FOR REGISTERS USE ONLY LOCUS TITLE RE FER EAICE JOHM -SPU 1U 4 JoAAu C. SAS AFJN SEE -- B00k ZJL8 - PA GE 132 C NAISLES SCI' IOW klAMEE SEE' BOOK M%- M C-k 2 94- N AMT) 13WK 22D4 PAGE 300 N4. IMT) 0AZUE LXIS JAIUOF SEE = 800K 2204 - PAGE e% N INT) BO OK ZZD4 -- PA 296 (1V4 WT) APPUE3 TO LD T.S lA 1 LB T.3 PLA�/iU1�IG 7 DF WESTNAMPTX MMSANUSET BMW APPROV A AIDT REDUIBED 11A1DER ,sUeDivise Al AIr L LAWS DATE klELS L. CgE ISTEAI SOb SEE: 800r- Ito 25 - PAGE 256 I ItEPOC7 THAT THIS PLAN AND SURVEY CONFORMS TO THE TECHNICAL AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS . I R-M ZT THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASS CHUSETTS . SIGNED: I DATE: LAIUD IA.1 W.F. WHITE Fl RK kiiE 4 AlORT14AM PTOU D T, i IUTC.EY MASSA C POSET TS D. T N I y UTLEY s SURVEYED FDA 2ICK D T NUAITGEY JD14U s jM4AJ C. SARA FIAJ d K8LE , It = 2On AUGUST 2, I X95 EL L A J. CL A PP T s yr 1 t� tH of SAS ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. a ASSOCIATES, INC. DAVID' SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS T. AST HUNTLEY 30 INDUSTEIAL DRIVE E � #35401 NORTHAMPTON, MASS. �FESS�� R � EV JDB'l lG -OZD- 95 13KE 3 3 I LI L.AJ. ItIL_t;u _ Checked — I"I.P. F?0U1UD j ��\ TIE CDU,P�'E Drt/L Y .N v m� I VzTEWD SET BEG. 1311 '39�,