7 Mulberry Street
Follow Massachusetts Historical Commission Survey Manual instructions for completing this form.
FORM B − BUILDING
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Photograph
Topographic or Assessor's Map
Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons
Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Date (month / year): March, 2010
Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number
10B-25 Easthampton NTH.14
Town: Northampton
Place: (neighborhood or village) Leeds
Address: 7 Mulberry Street
Historic Name: Leeds General Store
Uses: Present: Five-family Residence
Original: General Store
Date of Construction: 1842
Source: Registry of Deeds
Style/Form: Greek Revival
Architect/Builder:
Exterior Material:
Foundation: brick
Wall/Trim: clapboards, stucco
Roof: asphalt shingles
Outbuildings/Secondary Structures:
Major Alterations (with dates):
North ell added, wing added and infill added in angle of
gable and wing. N.d.
Condition: fair
Moved: no | x | yes | | Date
Acreage: 0.189 acres
Setting: This building is set near the foot of a hill
overlooking a former textile mill.
INVENTORY FORM B CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON ] [7 MULBERRY STREET]
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No.
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Continuation sheet 1
NTH.14
___ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form.
Use as much space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:
Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community.
This is a two-and-a-half story, Greek Revival building, formerly a store, that has a complex plan and elevation. The main block
of the store has a front-gable roof whose eaves make full returns to create a Greek Revival pediment. It is this section of the
building that carries its dominant stylistic features. There is a two-and-a-half story utilitarian ell on the north that is four bays
long, and a two-and-a-half story wing on the east. A two-story section fills the angle between the main block and the wing, and it
has fenestration that was formerly commercial, again making this a utilitarian part of the building. The main block on the first
story has a typical storefront with a recessed center entry between a display window on the east and what would have been a
display window on the west but has since been enclosed with clapboards. A lintel with a cornice below a signboard spans the
width of the storefront between first and second stories. Two widely-spaced windows on the second story have 2/2 sash and
there is a window centered in the pediment. The two-story infill section has a low-pitched, shed roof and on the first story of the
south façade is a band of windows and an off-center door beneath a cornice-topped lintel. A shed roofed hood on braces
extends over the door. A fourth window and a secondary entry under a small. shed roofed hood provide two bays on the east
end of the façade. This section of the building has clapboards on the south façade and on the east façade stucco covers the
first story and clapboards on the second story. Windows in this section are a mixture of 2/2 and 1/1 replacement windows. This
building with its evident functional changes over time contributes importantly to the character of the village center of Leeds.
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the
owners/occupants played within the community.
From Form B of 1976: “The narrow and deep gorge of the Mill River 4 ½ miles from the center of Northampton was first settled in
the first decade of the 19th century. By 1814, there were two woolen mills, a cotton mill, subsequently changed to a woolen mill,
a school house, several residences and a boarding house. Two of the mills were owned by Col. James Shepherd and his
cousins. In 1831, the Northampton Woolen Company was formed, and purchased the mills. Soon after they began business,
they opened a store. This was a company owned and run store until 1827. At that time, Phillip Ridgeway, son-in-law of Col.
Shepherd, purchased the store and operated it himself. After passing through two other owners, Benjamin North succeeded as
store owner during the 1830’s. In 1842, he built the current store and remained as proprietor until 1862. Mr. North came fr om
England in 1820, as a hand weaver, and soon became a valued citizen of the town.
For many years, the Leeds Post Office was located in this building.”
BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
Beers, F. W. County Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873.
Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831.
Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895.
Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884.
Walling, Henry F. Map of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
INVENTORY FORM B CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON ] [7 MULBERRY STREET]
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No.
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Continuation sheet 2
NTH.14
National Register of Historic Places Criteria Statement Form
Check all that apply:
Individually eligible Eligible only in an historic district
Contributing to a potential historic district Potential historic district
Criteria: A B C D
Criteria Considerations: A B C D E F G
Statement of Significance by _____Bonnie Parsons___________________
The criteria that are checked in the above sections must be justified here.
The Leeds General Store would contribute to a Leeds Center Historic District. This small industrial village center
was rebuilt after the flood of 1874 had washed away its preceding textile mill buildings, housing and residents. It
continued to function as a mill village into the 20th century and the bridge connected industries on both sides of the
Mill River. Architecturally it is significant as a representative mill village with boarding house, general store, mill
building, bridge, and workers’ housing. It has integrity of design, setting, association, feeling, workmanship and
materials.