62 Chestnut Street
Follow Massachusetts Historical Commission Survey Manual instructions for completing this form.
FORM B − BUILDING
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Photograph
Topographic or Assessor's Map
Please see continuation sheet.
Recorded by: Bonnie Parsons
Organization: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Date (month / year): March, 2010
Assessor’s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number
17C -187 Easthampton NTH.108
Town: Northampton
Place: (neighborhood or village) Florence
Address: 62 Chestnut Street
Historic Name: David Ranney House
Uses: Present: single-family house and bed and
breakfast establishment Original: single-family house
Date of Construction: ca. 1865
Source: Directory and map
Style/Form: eclectic
Architect/Builder:
Exterior Material:
Foundation: brick
Wall/Trim: clapboards
Roof: asphalt shingles
Outbuildings/Secondary Structures: Shed built 2004
Major Alterations (with dates): Enclosed side porch
added ca. 1930.
Condition: good
Moved: no |x| yes | | Date
Acreage: 0.258 Acres
Setting: This property is located on a quiet residential
street and is adjacent to a rail-trail bike path. It is shaded by
a mature maple tree.
INVENTORY FORM B CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON] [62 Chestnut Street]
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No.
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Continuation sheet 1
NTH.108
___ Recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
If checked, you must attach a completed National Register Criteria Statement form.
Use as much space as necessary to complete the following entries, allowing text to flow onto additional continuation sheets.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:
Describe architectural features. Evaluate the characteristics of this building in terms of other buildings within the community.
This one-and-a-half story house under a front-gable roof began as a small house that has over time been expanded and
embellished to become a substantial building. The main block of the house is three bays wide and the equivalent of four bays
long. It has a center chimney and an added through-eaves exterior chimney on its north elevation. The east side hall entry is a
Colonial Revival style alteration with slender colonettes rising through an entablature to support a cornice. This is a unique
surround whose proportions are consistent with the house. There is a one-story ell on the west side of the house followed by an
attached garage. A three-sided, Italianate style bay is located on the south elevation of the ell and there is a shed-roofed wing
on the north elevation. This house is among a number of workers’s houses on the street and is one of the best-preserved
among them.
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Discuss the history of the building. Explain its associations with local (or state) history. Include uses of the building, and the role(s) the
owners/occupants played within the community.
From the Form B of 1980, “Some time before 1854 Chestnut Street was laid out from Main Street to Bridge Road. An impetus to
develop was provided by the expansion of the Florence Sewing Machine Company on the southern side of Main Street at the
intersection of Chestnut Street. They built and owned a number of cottages and boarding houses in this area during the 1860s
and 1870s. This cottage is not much different from those owned by the company and was probably built for them in the early
1860s. The 1873 atlas shows this house as being occupied by David Ranney, an employee of the Florence Sewing Machine
Company who by 1885 had risen to superintendent of the machine department.”
BIBLIOGRAPHY and/or REFERENCES
Beers, F. W. County Atlas of Hampshire Massachusetts, New York, 1873.
Hales, John G. Plan of the Town or Northampton in the County of Hampshire, 1831.
Miller, D. L. Atlas of the City of Northampton and Town of Easthampton, Hampshire County, Massachusetts, Philadelphia, 1895.
Walker, George H. and Company. Atlas of Northampton City, Massachusetts, Boston, 1884.
Walling, Henry F. Map of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, New York, 1860.
INVENTORY FORM B CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON] [62 Chestnut Street]
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No.
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Continuation sheet 2
NTH.108
INVENTORY FORM B CONTINUATION SHEET [NORTHAMPTON] [62 Chestnut Street]
MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Area(s) Form No.
220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125
Continuation sheet 3
NTH.108
National Register of Historic Places Criteria Statement Form
Check all that apply:
Individually eligible Eligible only in an historic district
Contributing to a potential historic district Potential historic district
Criteria: A B C D
Criteria Considerations: A B C D E F G
Statement of Significance by _____Bonnie Parsons___________________
The criteria that are checked in the above sections must be justified here.
This property would contribute to a Florence Center Historic District. The potential historic district of Florence
Center is significant as the commercial, residential, institutional center of the village that developed from 1657 when
it was set off as Northampton’s “Inner Commons” as agricultural land and 1681 when the first sawmill was erected at
a falls on the Mill River. The agricultural and industrial village developed through the 18th and 19th centuries around
industry on the Mill River, agriculture on the alluvial flood plain and the Strong Tavern and later Cottage Hotel at the
intersection of Main and Maple Streets. It is significant for the silk industry that flourished through the Civil war as
an alternative to slave-picked cotton and for the establishment of the Northampton Association for Education and
Industry, a utopian community that existed 1843-1847. Association members after its close continued in Florence
their principles of equality by running the Underground Railroad through the village and harboring fugitive slaves. It
is significant as the home of Sojourner Truth. 19th century industry in the Center included the Florence Sewing
Machine Company, which built its own housing.
Architecturally the Center is significant for the range of Gothic Revival, Italianate, Stick Style, French Second
Empire, Queen Anne and Colonial Revival style homes, for its commercial blocks and library in the Revival styles of
the late 19th century. Gothic Revival and Italianate style churches are architect-designed in high style versions. The
potential district has integrity of workmanship, design, feeling, association, and materials.