NOI.pdf310 CMR 10.99 DEPFilc No. (To be provided by DEP) Form 3 Cityffown: Northampton Applicant: Julius Gy Fabos Commonwealth of Massachuse/fs Notice of Intent Under the Department of Defense United States ofAmeric:a
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40
The City of Northampton's Wetland Protection Ordinance, Ch.24
and
Application for a Department of the Army Permit
Part I: General Information
1. Location: Street Address -=P....,h=eas=an=t::...:H=ill'-'C=o=n=d=o=m=in=i=u=m=s.._. 8=0::....=B-=a"'""rr=ett=-=S"'"'tr=e=et,_ ______ _
Lot Number Parcel No. 24B-04 l -500
2. Project Type Limited Project Description Maintenance dredging of the drainage swale. located
along the southern property boundaiy. of accumulated sediment: improving its hydraulic
characteristics: disposal of soils on adjacent uplands: and future maintenance of the swale.
3. Registry: County: Hampden Current Book: 4547 & Page: 223 -226
Certificate (if Registered Land): ----------~----------~
4. Applicant: Julius Qy & Edith Fabos Telephone: 413-253-7166
Address: 45 Canton Avenue. Amherst. MA 01002
5. Property Owner: Julius Gy & Edith Fabos Telephone: 413-253-7166
Address: 45 Canton Avenue. Amherst. MA 01002
6. Representative: Assoc. Environmental Scientists. Inc. Telephone: 413-737-3586
Address: 311 Elm Street. West Springfield. MA 01089
7. a Have the Conservation Commission and the Department's Regional Office each been sent.
by certified mail or hand deliver, 2 copies of completed Notice of Intent, with supporting
plans and documents? Yes [ X ] No [
b. Has the fee been submitted? Yes [ X] No [
c. Total Filing Fee Submitted $ -=2=-50~."'""00"'-------------------
d. Cityffown Share of Filing Fee $ 137.50 State Share of Filing Fee$ -...:.1...:..1=2.=5-.0 __ _
(~nt to Ci1yrro\n1) ( 1/2 o( foe in excess of $25. sc.:nt lo DcP)
e. Is a brief statement attached indicating how the applicant calculated the fee? Yes [ X ] No [ ]
4/1/94 310 CMR -411
8. Have all obtainable permits, variances and approvals required by local bylaw been obtained" Yes[X] No[] Obtained Applied For Not Applied For Yes per wetland regulation instructions for filing NO Is (310 CMR I 0. 99) 9. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction order pursuant to G.L. c. 131, S 40A orG.L.c.130,SIOS? Yes[] No[X]
10. List all plans and supporting documents submitted with this Notice of Intent.
Identifying
Number/Letter Title, Date
AES 971003 Drainage Swale Dredging. Pheasant Hill Condominium
Northampton. MA by AES. Inc. dated l l-10-97
11. Check those resource areas within which work is proposed:
(a) [ X] Buffer Zone to a
(b) Inland:
[ X] Bank*
[ X] Bordering Vegetated Wetlands*
[ ] Land Under Water Body & Waterway*
(c) Coastal:
[ ] Land Under the Ocean*
[ ] Coastal Beach*
[ ] Barrier Beach*
[ ] Rocky Intertidal Shore*
[ ] Land Under Salt Pond*
[ ] Fish Run*
[ ] Riverfront Area
Land Subject to Flooding
[ ] Bordering
[ ] Isolated
[ ] Designated Port Area*
[ ] Coastal Dune
[ ] Coastal Bank
[ ] Salt Marsh*
[ ] Land Containing Shellfish*
*Likely to involve US Army Corps of Engineers concurrent jurisdiction.
See General Instructions for Completing Notice of Intent
12. Is the project within estimated habitat which is indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife (if any) published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program? YES [ ] NO [ X] Date printed on the Estimated Habitat Map NO MAP AV AlLABLE [ ] (if any): 1997-98 Edition If yes, have you sent a copy of the Notice oflntent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program via the US Postal Service by certified or priority mail (or otherwise sent it in a manner that guarantees delivery within two days) no later than the date of the filing of this Notice oflntent with the conservation commission and the DEP regional office?
YES [ ] NO [ ] NA
If yes, please attach evidence of timely mailing or other delivery to the Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program.
Part II: Site Description
Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description
or calculations) to clearly, completely and accurately describe existing site conditions.
Identifying
Number/Letter
(of plan, narrative
or calculation)
Figure 2 & Narra
Table I & Narra.
AES 971003
AES 971003
AES 971003
NA
NA
AES 971 OOJ&Narra
NA
AES 971003
AES 971003
NA
NA
AES 971003
NA
NA
Natural Features
Soils
Vegetation
Topography
Open water bodies (not including ponds and lakes)
Flowing water bodies (including streams and rivers)
Public and private surface water and ground water supplies
on or within I 00 feet of site
Maximum annual ground water elevations with dates and location
of test
Boundaries of resource areas checked under Part I, item 11 above
Other
Man-made Features
Structures (such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls)
Drainage and flood control facilities at the site and immediately off
the site, including culverts and open channels (with inverts). dams
and dikes
Subsurface sewage disposal systems
Underground utilities
Roadways and parking areas
Property boundaries, easements and rights-of-way
Other
'..._/ Part III: Work Description Indicate which of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in narrative description or calculations) to clearly, completely and accurately describe work proposed within each of the resource areas checked in Part I, item 11 above. Identifying Number/Letter (of plan, narrative or calculation)
NA
NA
NA
AES 971003 & Narra
NA
NA
NA
NA
Planview and Cross Section of:
Structures (such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls)
Drainage and flood controJ facilities, including culverts and open
channels (with inverts), dams and dikes
Subsurface sewage disposal systems & underground utilities
Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and
composition of material
Compensatory storage areas, where required in accordance with
Part III, Section 10.57(4) of the regulations
Wildlife habitat restoration or replication areas
Other
Point Source Discharge
Description of characteristics of discharge from point source (both
closed and open channel), when point of discharge falls within
resource area checked under Part I, item 11 above, as supported by
standard engineering calculations, data and plans. including but not
limited to the following:
1. Delineation of the drainage area contributing to the point of discharge;
2. Pre-and post-development peak run-off from the drainage area, at the point of discharge.
for at least the I 0-year and 100-year frequency storm;
3. Pre-and post-development rate of infiltration contributing to the resource area checked under
Part I, item 11 above;
4. Estimated water quality characteristics of pre-and post-development run-off at the point of
discharge.
Part V: Additional Information for a Department of the Army Permit 1. COE Application No. _ ___,P'-'e""'n,,.d ...... ino.:::g,__ ______ _ (to be provided by COE) 2. Unnamed Intermittent Stream (Drainage Swale) to Barrett Street Brook (Name of waterway) 3. Names and addresses of property owners adjoining your property: See Abutters List 4. Document other project alternatives (i.e., other locations and/or construction methods,
particularly those that would eliminate the discharge of dredged or fill materials into waters or
wetlands).
5. 8 112" x 11" drawings in plan view and cross-section, showing the resource area and the
proposed activity within the resource area. Drawings must be to scale and should be clear
enough for photocopying.
Certification is required from the Division of Water Pollution Control before the Federal permit
can be issued. Certification must be obtained by contacting the Division of Water Pollution
Control, 1 Winter Street, Boston MA 02108.
Where the activity will take place within the area under the Massachusetts approved Coastal Zone
Management Program, the applicant certifies that his proposed activity complies with and will be
conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved program.
Information provided will be used in evaluation of the application for a permit and is made a
matter of public record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of this information is
voluntary; however, if necessary information is not provided, the application cannot be processed,
nor can a permit be issued.
I hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and
accompanying plans, documents and supporting data are true and complete, to the best of my
knowledge.
ti< :r.,rs:<J-L#'~ =~
Signature of Applicant: Julius Gy Fabos
J
ti-/" -f1 > Date
1/-/'1· 71
Date
FORM "Exception to ENG Form 4345 approved by HOUSACE, 6 May 1982"
NED 100 (TEST)
1 May 82 "This do.."'\lanent contains a join D.:pi1rt111.:nt of th.: . ..\n11y a11d Stat.: of l\ia!;liil.:l1us.:tt£ applk:ition for a p.:nnit to
obtai11 p.:nnission to p«fonu ucti,·i1i,.,. in l!nit~d Stat,'S wat~rs. 111~ Olli,-,. ,,f Munag.:111.:111 ~nd ll11dg.:1 (0~ !BJ hu£
approved those qu.:stions requi~d by the llS ..\nny Corps ofEngin.:.:rs. O~IB Numb.:r 0702 _0036 and expiration
date ofJO S.:ptemb.:r 1983 appli<s." ·n1is stat~ment will b.: s.:t in 6 point typo:.
ADDENDUM TO NOTICE OF INTENT (Form 3) Drainage Swale Maintenance Dredging Pheasant Hill Condominium Northampton, MA
PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed work is filed as a "Limited Project," as specified in 310 CMR I0.53(3) (g) and (i).
The work consists of maintenance dredging of the drainage swale, located along rhe southern
property boundary, of accumulated sediment and improving its hydraulic characteristics.
Moreover, the applicant will enhance wildlife habitat associated with the swale by employing
bioengineering techniques to stabilize the bank soils and promote plant growth which will provide
food, cover and breeding sites for wildlife. This filing is made under Category 2( e) of 310 CMR
10.03(c)(Limited Projects), for which the filing fee is $250.00. A copy of the filing fee calculation
work sheet is included with this Notice ofintent
PART II: SITE DESCRIPTION
NATURAL FEATURES
The following soil data was obtained from the US Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey
for Hampshire County, Central Part, Massachusetts. Soils at the project site and the immediate
area consist ofUdorthents (Ud), Enosberg fine sandy loam (EsB) and Maybid silt loam (Ma).
The Udorthents consists of areas from which soil material has been excavated and areas were the
excavated material has been deposited. The original soils were typically excessively drained to
moderately well drained ranging from nearly level to steep.. The Enosberg soils are described as
deep, nearly level or depressional soils that are poorly drained. The Maybid are also described as
deep, nearly level and very poorly drained found in depressions and low-lying areas. Two hand
borings were performed in the lawn just north of the swale as part of the information gathered for
this Notice. These borings indicated a low chroma soil matrix; however, there were no mottles
within the first twelve inches and no other signs of hydrology. Thus, they did not possess the
characteristics of a hydric soil even though they did appear to be poorly drained.
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
[f~:JE~ f • . ----J : :::= -... -'=, Drainage Swale Sediments The sediments to be removed from the site are a mix of sand, silt, clay and organic matter that has accumulated over a number of years. This material has been analyzed for textural composition and potential hazardous content as per the requirements of the DEP Wetland and Waterways Division Application for 401 Water Quality Certification. The required analyses revealed no hazardous substances in excess of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan standards for RCS-I
thresholds found in 310 CMR 40.1600. Complete results of the soil investigations for grain size
and chemical content are included in the Addendum.
Vegetation
Facultative wetland, facultative and upland plants (see Table 1) dominate the vegetation in and
around the swale. Red maple trees, dogwood saplings and jewel weed appear to be the dominant
plants. A large variety of other shrubs and herbaceous plants exist in the general area; however,
jewel weed appears to be the main herb disturbed as a result of work already performed at the
site.
Boundary of Resource Areas
The boundaries shown on the accompanying plan are those delineated in the field by Associated
Environmental Scientists, Inc. (AES) in October 1997. The delineation technique utilized
topography, vegetation, indicators of hydrology and soils.
Bordering Vegetated Wetland (B VW)
The only area of Bordering Vegetated Wetland found in the area of the proposed work is
located on the southern side of the drainage swale. The BVW is outlined by B-2 through B-
24 on the plan and is dominated by jewel weed.
The upper boundary of the Bank is the first observable break in the slope. The lower
boundary is the mean annual low flow level which is the bottom of the swale since the
drainage swale flows intermittently.
Land Under Water CLUW)
There is no Land Under Water resource area within the proposed project area because of the
intermittent flow within the drainage swale.
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
.....
• Riverfront Area Under the Rivers Protection Act, the Riverfront Area extends 200 feet laterally in both directions from the mean high water level of perennial streams. Within this area is an inner and outer riparian zone, each 100 feet in width on either side of the perennial stream. According to the USGS topographical map (Easthampton Quadrangle) of the area and site observations, no perennial streams contribute to the drainage swale within 200 feet of the
project site. Therefore, it would appear that the current project does not fall under the
jurisdiction of the Rivers Protection Act.
Structures
The only structure currently located at the project site is a small footbridge which allows access to
the wooded area south of the prl'>perty. The footbridge is two (2) feet wide spanning a distance
of 16 feet over the drainage swale. The footbridge consists of wood planks across wood beams
which lay on the ground on either end. The footbridge can only accommodate pedestrian traffic.
Resource Area Values
Of the eight (8) interests of the M.G.L. C. 131 s. 40 listed below, only storm damage prevention
and protection of wildlife habitat could be considered partial benefits of the drainage swale.
1. Protection of Public and Private Water Supply
2. Protection of Groundwater Supply
3. Flood Control
4. Storm Damage Prevention
5. Prevention of Pollution
6. Protection ofLand Containing Shellfish
7. Protection of Fisheries
8. Protection of Wildlife Habitat
Storm Damaee Prevention
Currently the small swale south of the condominium complex and close to the property line serves
the function of conducting storm water flows to the larger wetland off the propeny to the east
from around the complex as well as from adjacent land to the south. This function thereby
protects site structures from storm flow damage. Due to increased sedimentation in the swale,
over the years since the complex was built, the movement of water in the swale has been impeded.
The current proposal will increase this very important function by increasing the hydraulic
capacity of the swale.
"Committed To EnvironmentaJiy Sound Solutions"
Wildlife Habitat [[fiflt] =....--~-= Al. =-=I No rare or endangered species of wildlife are known to exist on the project site; nor was there any estimated wildlife habitat noted in the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Atlas, 1997-98 Edition. Completion of a Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Form for the drainage swale and surrounding area revealed that the overall habitat value of the area as it exists now is fairly low
(1.5 to 2.0 out of 10). This is mainly because of the intermittent nature of the stream, its
proximity to the adjacent building, and the extent of accumulated sediment. While it is very poor
habitat for mammals, it is only fair for birds, amphibians, and reptiles (see Wildlife Habitat
Evaluation Form).
PART ill: WORK DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves the dredging of approximately 25 cubic yards of spoils from an
area of approximately 2,600 square feet. This material consist of sands, silts, clays, and organic
litter deposited over the years. The purpose of this project is to restore the drainage swale
located along the southern propeny boundary. It is also intended to grade the area such that the
hydraulic characteristics of the drainage swale will be improved, thereby giving greater protection
for the building to the north of the swale.
Accumulated sediments will be dredged from the drainage swale with a backhoe and/or by hand
excavation. Excavated material will be cast to the north of the swale to construct the proposed
landscape area as shown on the plan. The upland dewatering/disposal area is not located within a
wetland resource area.
Two tree stumps located near the northern edge of the drainage swale will be removed prior to
the dredging activities to allow for access and grading. Additionally, the logs recently placed in
three inlet areas along the southern edge of the drainage swale will be removed. The logs in two
of these areas shown on the plan, where flow enters from offsite, will be replaced by surge stone
to help stabilize the soils against erosion. The third area where logs are removed be graded
loamed and seeded.
A siltation barrier and haybales will be installed across the eastern end (downstream) of the
drainage swale to prevent sediments from being carried out into the Barrett Street Marsh during
dredging operations. In addition, hay bale checks will be placed across the swale during and upon
completion of construction activities. Upon completion of the dredging and stabilization of the
planted areas, the erosion control barriers shall be removed.
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
-
.......
.......
PART IV: MITIGATING MEASURES The regulated bank along the drainage swale on site exists between the mid line of the intermittent stream and the first observable break in the slope. Thus, no LUW exists at this site. The bank
that is present has been degraded over the years by sedimentation of this man-made swale. Its
current condition is that of a relatively broad flat ditch with no good bank definition. The
presumptive functions of this continuous bank do not all appear to be present; however, based on
the lack of borrowing sites and bank overhang. Moreover, vegetation on the north side of the
swale banks has been, and is currently, composed of a grass lawn providing little to no cover or
shading.
The current project will restore the bank to its pre-sedimentation condition. No significant
wildlife habitat appears to have been present in the swale since its creation when the complex was
constructed in the early 1970' s. The proposed swale dredging and rehabilitation will include the
widening of the bottom to about five (5) feet and the stabilization of the banks on both sides by
the installation of coconut fiber blankets along the entire length of the rehabilitated portion (320
ft). Please see the plan for the details of this dredging and rehabilitation. When complete the new
swale will meet the five (S) perfonnance standards for Banks found in 310 CMR 10.54 (4)(a)(l-5)
as follows.
1.
2.
3 .
4.
5.
the bank will have improved physical stability;
the banks which form the intermittent stream will have improved carrying capacity;
ground water quality will be unchanged and surface water quality will be improved by the
filtering abilities of the bioengineered banks;
by planting \>oth banks with a wetland seed mix and stabilization with coconut fiber
blankets the amount and type of vegetation for providing breeding habitat, escape cover
and food for wildlife will be greatly enhanced;
wildlife habitat functions will be provided as noted above.
Bordering Vegetated Wetland CBVW)
The BVW on this project is restricted to the south side of the swale because there is a lawn all
along the north side of the swale. The species present along most of the BVW are limited to a
few dominants. As can be seen from examining Table 1, there are many total species present in
and a round the swale but most of these are uncommon. Also, these plants are mainly near the
eastern end of the swale close to the adjacent marsh area. Therefore, the area where work will be
done to dredge and rehabilitate the swale will be improved in its diversity by placing the fiber
blankets to hold the variety of plants that will grow as a result of the wetland seed mix
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
application. These new plants held by the fiber blanket will therefore represent a restoration of the disturbed BVW along the south side of the swale of approximately 720 sf The area of BVW on the south side of the swale is 1820 sf; of this about 900 sf has been disturbed. Moreover, BVW in the form of a wetland seed mix growing from fiber blankets will also be created on the north bank of the swale (720 sf) where grass currently exists. Thus, the total BVW restoration will be a minimum 1,440 sf plus any other incidental areas on the south side of the swale which will be planted with wetland seed mix.
Buffer Zone
All of the work to be done will be performed within the buffer zone of the BVWs. All activities
will be conducted with care to minimize impacts to the wetland resources that exist in the area.
Erosion controls will be as per specifications on AES Plan #971003.
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
Table 1 Partial List of Plant Species Present Wetland and Adjacent Buffer Zones Pheasant Hill Condominiums, 80 Barrett Street Northampton.MA October 1997 AES Job# 971003 Common Name Taxon Abundance
Trees. Saplings and Vines
Silver Maple Acer saccharinum
Box Elder Acer negundo
Crab Apple Ma/us boccata
Norway Maple Acer platinoides
Black Locust Robinia pseudo-acacia
Red Oak Quercus rubra
Black Cherry Prunus serotina
Oriental Bittersweet Celastrus orbirulatus
Grape Vitus, sp.
Shrubs
Staghorn Sumac
Red Maple
Multiflora Rose
Meadowsweet
Slippery Elm
European Honeysuckle
Red-osier Dogwood
White Mulberry
Black Willow
Silky Dogwood
Red Panicle Dogwood
Rubus, sp.
Common Elderberry
Burning Bush
Northern Arrowwood
Black Raspberry
Quaking Aspen
Rhus typhina
Acerrubrum
Rosa multiflora
Spiraea latifolia
Ulmus rubra
Lonicera xylasteum
Cornus stolinifera
Morus a/ha
Salix nigra
Cornus amomum
Cornus foemina
Rubus, sp.
Sambuccus canadensis
Euonymus atropurpureus
Viburum recognitum
Rubus occidentalis
Populus trembloides
M
U-M
M
U-M
M
M
U-M u
U-M
U-M
M-A
U-M
U-M
U-M
M
M u
M
M
u
M u
u
u
U-M
M
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
[ft)~~ Jf =--i;;=: Indicator
FACW
FAC
NL
NL
FACU·
FACU-
FACU
NL
NL
FAC
FACU
FAC+
FAC
NL
FACW+
NL
FACW+
FACW
FAC
FACW
FACU
FACW
NL
FACU
Herbaceous Plants Clearweed Pi/ea pumila M FACW ,__ Burdock Arctium minus u NL Purple-leaved Willow Herb Epilobium co/oratum u OBL Celandine Stylophorum diphyllum u NL Sensitive Fern Onoclea sensibilis M FACW
Bittersweet Nightshade Solanum du/camara u FAC-
Arrowleaved Tear Thumb Po/ygonum sagittatum U-M OBL
Gill-over Ground Glechoma hederacea u FACU
Bitter Dock Rumex obtusifol u FACU-
New England Aster Aster novae-angliae u FACW-
Ladythumb Po/ygonum persicaria u FACW
Three-seeded Mercury Aca/ypha rhomboidea u FACU-
Arrowhead, sp. Sagittaria, sp. u
Wild Carrot Daucus carota U-M
Jewel Weed Impatiens M-A FACW
Yellow wood-sorrel Oxalis stricta u NL
Lady Fern Athyrium felix-femina u FAC
Yellow-cress Radicula sp. u
Fringed loosestrife Lysimachia ciliata U-M FACW
Marsh Hedge Nettle Stachys palustris M OBL
Common Buttercup Ranunculus acris u FAC+
Meadow Horsetail Equisetum pratense u FACW
Dwarf St. Johnswart Hypericum mutilum u FACW
Pin Cherry Prunus pensylvanica U-M FACU-
Virginia Stickseed Hackelia virginiana u FACU
Rough Bedstraw Galivon asprellum u OBL
Goldenrod Solidago sp. M
Virginia Creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia U-M FACU
Cinnamon Fern Osmunda cinnamomea u FACW
Sphagnum Moss Sphagnum, sp. U-M OBL
Notes
Abundance: VA=Very abundant; A=Abundant; M=Moderate abundance;
U=Uncommon
Hydric categories: OBL=Obligate Wetland; FACW=Facultative Wetland; ..... FAC=Facultative; FACU=Facultative Upland; UPL=Obligate
Upland; NL=Not Listed (often considered UPL)
-
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
application. These new plants held by the fiber blanket will therefore represent a restoration of the disturbed BVW along the south side of the swale of approximately 720 sf. The area of BVW on the south side of the swale is 1820 sf; of this about 900 sf has been disturbed. Moreover, BVW in the form of a wetland seed mix growing from fiber blankets will also be created on the north bank of the swale (720 st) where grass currently exists. Thus, the totaJ B VW restoration will be a minimum 1,440 sf plus any other incidental areas on the south side of the swale which will be planted with wetland seed mix.
Buffer Zone
All of the work to be done will be performed within the buffer zone of the BVWs. All activities
will be conducted with care to minimize impacts to the wetland resources that exist in the area.
Erosion controls will be as per specifications on AES Plan #971003_
"Committed To Environmentally Sound Solutions"
I
1
(
(
l
r
\S
,
IN
C
.
LA
N
I
>
lll
W
D
E
R
WATERllOl>IES.& WATF.RWAYS<11W'AMDl'\IUU"f"1Ulll.GJ...aW'l.u•11tcr . .,.
~EC
l
'
N
O
.
9
1
(
0
0
J
_
ARl!A /:No;v,tt5~ ~~ DATE /O [l~/9~ WIIATIIBR c..leor WILDLIFE HABITAT EVALUATION FORM• EVALUATED DY HCL
~~.
S
r
i
~
+
fl
;
ll
Gr-.
.
.
d
o
s
, No1r1t:la.ll<.c.jl1dl-t A. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS•••
VE
G
E
T
A
T
f
V
E
LA
Y
E
J
t
•
•
.; .• •·•···•·••·· . ..RiL.~Ai.\ :.·~gij~·;::,j irt¢iltifl.!~i'ii iiP~~;~·~·~ ::;~~il~ .. ~~~¢f.:·1;.f •.• ·····••< ..... > <<::j: ilESoURCEAREA DESCRlmON
SU
D
M
E
R
O
E
N
T
S
0 0 ,µ...+ NA-Al.It ~k-IM.o.de.. S'\.Ut.lt~
\F
L
D
A
T
I
N
0
-
1
.
E
A
V
I
I
D
I 0 I 0 I ;VA I NA-I ).) A
J:
M
e
R
a
f
!
f
m
H~v-
b
o
.
.
c
e
G
U
S
I 4 I S-l·l-'J'<o'' I ed~e.. I jGlwe( v.>rec!. a:l ~ 'reQ.~ o~ ~pe~~; witt.. V{'~~--\l>:f 1 ~ °"' S:-cr~ rik.
1m
u
n
s
+T
R
E
E
S
I '3 I ~ I "3-~· I *'ri~ I ~ ~l....; ~o~Wt>0<l
\S
O
I
L
S
,
PEAD
~
~
·
~
~
;
[
~~illl=~~;~fJ;'.;, ·~:~;_Mn~=~~·(,~ c
\o
m
.
n
E
R
s
+
RO
C
K
OlJl'CROPS 0 o NA-NJr-N Jr:-NA--)./If ~tlo-~ ~ -e~· ct-.-..
\E
A
D
n
t
E
E
S
+E
M
E
R
G
E
N
T
S
0 Q tr '' " It ff C~ ~ 1-J~ .... ~~
fA
P
L
I
T
r
n
R
+1
W
I
O
S
'Z-.J() /;heir t~ 1N..o-1'wL, dw~~ (eo..J-O; Ho1-1.-WaoJ.c F~·
~DS
T
R
A
T
E
C
O
M
P
O
s
m
o
N
3 /0-0 °$''<-~.~~Ir;~;[~~ S~; 'vlo cl~ _,
1
JlYD
J
t
O
L
O
O
l
C
:
;
;
(
;
~
i
j
~
;
c
•. :. .10 ~~l.~~tj:· 1 :~:·:;·:·::1;,:i• .. :.:i=·&:'~q+·i]0:mr~~11r;~;1mi.~Jij~~~~:·1~~~·r~:11·::~;:1i1::::1 ·{i¢4*~~08··x .. :.>:: : ...•. · ••· 1 · ··•··· /. P: : N<JrES .· : ....... ··
~TE.
R
D
E
P
T
I
I
P
R
O
F
I
I
B
I 0 I i~~'r~.tr4 '6~. I (S)WRDIDITY I ~;PikJ. .... \(":~ ~.I h•qti ;"" S'~
~TE
R
vm
.
o
c
m
I 'S I l.<;"-2.o +~s I (6)TEMPERATION I t.,~'-'. ;"' ~""'-"'-ev-I /aw ~loc.~ L. {o -+f;:f-
lo
L
T
O
R
I
F
F
L
E
R
A
n
o
I C> I /Jo/JC:-I (?)pH I ;v;v..,..._Q{, ~c.J;c. I 3-f~ ~tL
RA
T
I
O
N
OF
WA
T
E
R
l'
Y
P
E
)o
tl.
T
E
R
IR
A
T
O
R
V
WI
N
T
E
R
I
N
G
~D
I
N
O
I I iKie~"'4.~14,+ I (B)OENERALQUAU1Y I Cl~~ low-jCoM,"{"";'"-IUt~ a.re, /tJu.r-B. FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA• .. REr~v~J: .E.N~ l~~r.tJljt~ci··~\Wtlib~. i;§~·ki~."~~c•ts.~~UALl.v ousERVED <M Dll'ecqf,. ,~, . '2.. '2-I (} ( ~ W\tUt-~ JV().,\,._~ rwcCQ. ~ ~u~J_ 1~ ~"~ "'f~ wl"ttt sil{-~tl 9-a.~, ~ h ~ llitlR. ~J_ or Cd~ cL5"3oc_._~-f.eJ_ wftt& ~ ~~j ~JoaJ. U.{J-~~~b-6~ ~i-k "-. Tu ~. . C. SUMMARY RATING PER WILDLIFE CLASS•••
~s
'Z
-
3
(2) MAMMALS 0 (3) AMPlllDIANS 2.. (4) RErTJLES 2.. (5) FISH 0 -/
~UU
U
A
H
?
1
0
-.
.
a
l
l
l
l
l
l
n
l
W
1
1
1
1
.
A
N
D
S
PIOrBCllONACT (M.OLCloofl. 1J1. """·41J. lllMEI> ltBQ~TIONSBFIB::mlS 11-1"'7.
la
TO
\I
E
I
T
I
C
A
L
O
A
S
l
l
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
H
ICllliMll IJl."VISlill llY llALtllCAll!ll (1"4)
&V
A
U
I
A
T
I
O
N
I
AU
IASliD at.I A SlJDINQ 1-IO ICAU!: IJI. toOI ••• M'Gla&AJw. , •• ~ •-lliXall.UMI --.... ~ C't1€.1nt. ll 1ZA-I. /, ,--z.. 0 Ole-i 0 f. I 0 '-
~I
"O
c
!.
a.
<(
.
r·
I
I
71
/
o
o
"
3
--r-l. r I .l I I I t-"~-e~~IAT l\-l\ ~~' J ~Q..'fV'e."* ~+. If~#' 1.. I I I ( 0 -f 1--~9i-
Se
c
t
i
o
n
11-
In
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
of Hydrology
Hy
d
r
i
c
So
i
l
In
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
1.
So
i
l
Su
r
v
e
y
Is
th
e
r
e
a
pu
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
so
i
l
survey for this site? (!;> no
ti
t
l
e
/
d
a
t
e
:
ma
p
nu
m
b
e
r
:
so
i
l
ty
p
e
ma
p
p
e
d
:
hy
d
r
i
c
so
i
l
in
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
:
Ar
e
fi
e
l
d
ob
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
consistent with soil survey?
Re
m
a
r
k
s
:
2.
So
i
l
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Ho
r
i
z
o
n
De
p
t
h
D
0
,
5
'
-
0
A
0-
1
.
s
-
..
8
"\.
~"
-
~.o ,,
<;,
.
.
'
-
{'
l
.
.
q ,, Matrix Color -2.s-Y' 3/1 z.-rv 4(2-2.~ r 4(/-z.. yes no Mottles Color -#at.Ji;" /.J-O NI: pow&
Re
m
a
r
k
s
:
S
[',~i.
.
t
,
+
f\C4.{i ~es~ j \I\ () \.(A. o1t l--e_ ~
3.
Ot
h
e
r
:
"$
\
l
+
l Q Q. .......
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
:
Is
so
i
l
hydric? yes ® 'f( c'-Other Indicators of Hydrology: (check all that apply and describe) 0 Site inunda1ed: )/d (2-.lt D Depth to free water in observation hole: > . . " 0 Depttl to soil saturation in observation hole: > ( z_ D Water marics; >Jo D No ( Drift lines: --------------D Sedlmen1 deposits: Alo 0 Drainage patterns in BVW: /Jo D Oxidized rhizosphe res: /jrJ D Water-stained leaves: X/(} 0 Recorded data (st1eam, lake, or tidal gauge; aerial photo; other) : __ XJoJJc D Other: 1'1.4 Vegetation and Hydrology Conclusion yes no K Number of wetland fndicator plants D ~ ~ number e>f non-wetland indicator plants r Wetland hydrology present: hydric S-Oil present D @ otlier indicators of hydrology ~ present D Sample lor;atlon Is In a BVW D ~ I Submit UU. fomr wilfl the Reque.attor Determination of_Appllcablllty or Notke of Intent. Ill 'tJ c ca ;; Cll 3: 'tJ Cll .. ca -Cll O> Cll > O> c ·.: Cll 'D .. ' 0 m O> c ;: ., II .!: ii Cl I~
UI'iIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS EXTE~SIO~ West Experiment Station Box 38010 Amherst. MA 01003-8010
Richard Misiaszek
Assoc. Environ. Sci.
311 Elm Street
West Springfield, MA 01090
Mr. Misiaszek:
November 5~ 1997 P.O: Agro~logy Program Soil and Plant Tissue Testing Laboratory 413·545·2~ I t 413·545-1931 Fax
The moisture and organic matter percentages are listed below for your $81Dple
ID 971003 (Pheasant Hill Condo, Northampton). Results are expressed on a
dry weight ~is. Call us if you have questions.
RespectfuJly,
/; /? .·. A 'l ,: :.. .• ·. ·--l .• . . .
Steven M. Bodine
Lab Supervisor
Moisture Content (O/o)
Organic Matter (%)
Dry Weight
Basis
46.9
3.3
... -... _ .. -· .. .. UM~~EXTEN.S10N-,W1?f.lcingP.irtf!M4 .. -··----···---··-·----
UIWCld lll:'lk'I!'. 04'o.VlmM1 al AQl.c&.111Jr11 ~~1;t19. Ul'livvt•IV Of M.191.CllU&ellS u1en-.on Ollets ~JI oooonun.ry •II P'OOIM'll and .,,,PIOY"'el!I, l'•onled on ..c:yc1eel -· 0
r
AE
S
,
IN
C
.
l.
A
N
n
ll
l
l
l
D
E
R
WATERDODIES.& WATl<:RWAYS (PUP.&llDIPUAllL'f'TOW.C'-DW'T.UlaC'I' ....
PR
O
J
E
C
I
'
NO
.
9'q
(
o
o
3
_
_
ARl!A !),.;"'":!le" S(.p~ -DATB lo I f':l-/'i ~ WEATifER c'~ I WILDLIFE HABITAT EVALUATION FORM• EVALUATED DY IKL
?~?.
,
.
s
r
i
1
.
1
-
t
H;u
.
Gn
.
.
d
o
s
, Nov-"tka"'-<Piefl-f A. PHYSICAL CHARACTERIS'TICS•••
VEG
~
A
T
J
V
E
LA
Y
E
R
•
·
.
. ; ... JtELVAl/ ~1»1£~;::. -~TfJiii; .·:;~r~;ffl.ij[·1j; ;r~~~rnAt/1%~t6 it&roURt~ AREA DESCRJmoN
(I
)
SU
D
M
E
R
G
E
I
T
T
S
0 Q #.A-;V.4-NJ'f-~k-K.<.o.de_ 'S'l..JCJ.l-e...
(2
)
FL
O
A
TI
N
O
-
L
E
A
VB
D
0 0 )./A NA-N A CZ ( "jj \r"e.0<.V"° o-C-'/)v-orQY ~;
(l
)
E
M
e
R
a
F
.
r
m
He
v
-
k
e
a
S--·1--:?<o'' .. Qw-e[(...J(ed.. wifti V{>?\~i""ii~ <1'-'
(4
)
s1
m
u
n
s
+
rn
E
E
.
S
3 S:--"3-~o' ~;~ ired~~: ~o~We1ocl. s:-coti=t\:f 11'"lsi... ·
smL\P
E
4
~
v
:
~
:
1
:
i
~
~
!
f
r
~li.11==~~r&l~;~;~('.l·1~JrrAT\WTl1fNSGO Fr. 7
(1
)
BO
U
L
D
E
R
S
+
RO
C
K
O
U
I
'
C
R
O
P
S
0 0 NA-.N..+-Nk NA-N'k I \...N...fl~~ "\.... -Eo.l(· d'-"
1t-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
l
1
-
-
-
~
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
.
-
-
-
L
-
,
.
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
L
.
-
-
-
1
.
c~ ~ tJ~°''"i~
(3
)
1
.
.
E
.
A
P
U
f
T
E
R
+
l
W
I
O
S
L.. 30 /;~v-is \wl..1 e~c.\~ (eQ.~' "1oK-l.Joo F~·
(2
)
DE
A
D
Ti
l
E
E
.
S
+
EM
E
R
G
E
N
T
S
0 ,, ,, It ,, ff 0
(4
)
SU
D
S
T
R
A
T
E
C
O
M
P
O
s
m
o
N
3 /(JtJ -S'<.~rivo-'k Ii;-c;-il"'-~ S~i ~o el~
..
· .•
UY
l
>
J
t
O
L
O
G
I
C
R~
G
r
M
e
:.•<?. : ~kL.~~~<I • :·;·:'1 \::::.;:!:\::~;:l:N.e:;,;;~:1 ~11:1:!r1~:;j:;:I ~tj]~~~l91~91.~:~;i:1r~mj~1~.~~4v~~i::t:::·v : ) :\I · ·· ... :.: • NQTES •• ·
(1
)
WA
T
E
R
DE
M
l
l
PR
O
F
I
L
E
0 I 1~-b-~.tt~~~. I (5)lURDIDnY I ~;f'l~J ... v-~ ~.I ~lqLt i~ S'~
(2
)
WA
T
E
R
vm
.
o
c
r
r
v
'3 I 1.c;--2.0 +t>s I (6)TEMPERATIOl'f I ~~ '"' ~w."'er I lcnu "~toe.~ cL.9 .. :lo --Ra:t-
(3
)
PO
O
L
TO
Rl
m
.
E
R
A
T
I
O
(4
)
DU
R
A
T
I
O
N
O
P
W
A
T
I
!
R
'l'
V
P
E
(1
)
FO
O
D
(2
)
SH
E
L
T
E
R
(3
)
MI
G
R
A
T
O
R
Y
(4
)
OV
E
R
W
I
N
T
E
R
I
N
O
(.5
)
DR
E
E
D
J
N
O
O I /Jo!Je I (7) pH f N-;v,,.,._/2_-./o a.c.Jtc. I ~-t~ ~cl I I iK-fe~kc.~j I (8) GBNERALQUALm' I c:r~i.e low-jCoM,'ii-..:v.a:{ a.H!. lctw-B. FUN CT I 0 NA L CRITERIA••• . REJ~VAL i I:• ~:.~ • .Ji>W~~i:ivi~wi'.~~W.ttf~:v~~7~~;·~~·Ef~ciu~L~Y OBSERVED (llolio DlndlJ •I~) .• Q_ rz_ I (J Tl..iv Wld..V\-~ J'n)..1...r..tp-rw"<Q. ~ ~u~J. 1v.. ~r-~ "t~ w~ ~cl\-~<.l Sn'-\.~. ~ h ~ li:it\R.. ~J. or co~ c1..-5'&oc. .. ~-feJ_ w~ ~ ~~j ~00().J. U\iJ-~~s'b-6~ ~i-k{. ~ ~. C. S U M M A RY R AT I N G P E R W f L 0 f, I F E C LA SS • • •
(I
)
BI
R
D
S
"Z
-
3
(2) MAMMALS 0 (3) AMPlllBIANS 2-(-4) REl'TC~ 2. (5) FISll 0 -I
• P
U
l
A
U
D
-
.
u
.
v
a
T
O
~
wnLU1D1 PllOf1ICl'ION ACr (M.OL a.,., UI. Soa.41). llllVllB> llllOWATIONI mil'ICTM 11-1-11. ~ fJ "L:J • # /, C-z
"
MX
l
O
a
O
C
N
O
TO
VU
T
I
C
A
L
OA
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
talliMll DIMSliD IY llAllNICAID (lfH). \...I(/€,.~ J\..c1 lt~-/ ;1 -• 0
• ••
AU
.
NU
W
£
l
k
'
A
L
&V
A
U
J
A
T
K
N
AU
SAIED OH A IUDU«J l·IA ICAU!: 1.J • IOOI ,.. • wamaAla tf • OC>Cll • • ~ .. • IUI" J.lll.JCAllA , f" 011.-f of lo .,
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS EXTENSION West EitP9riment Station Box 38010 Amherst. MA 01003-S01 O TEXTURAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
Customer Name: Associated Environmental Scien.
Richard Misiaszek 311 Elm Street/P.O. Box 979
West Springfield, MA 01090-0970
Sample ID: 34611
P.02 Agroecology Program Soil and Plant Tissue Testing Laboratory 413·545·23, , 413·545· 1931 Fax
Customer Designation: Pheasant 8ill Condo. Northampton 971003
fercentages based on less than 2 mm {raction
Fraction
Sand Silt Clay
Sand Subrractions
Very Coarse
Coarse
Hedi um
Fine
Very Fine
7.1
11. 7
15. 9.
25.3
11.3
71.3
Percent
71.3
19.l
9.7
100.0
Silt subfractions
Coarse
Medium
Fine
7.4
8.5
3.2
19.l
Under USDA criteria this sample classifies as a sandy loam.
Classification is based on particles that are sand size and finer (i.e. less than 2 millimeters in diameter). Those particles greater than 2 mm a~e included in the textural name as a moditier (ex. gravelly). The sample submitted contained 2.8 ~gravel on a
weight basis. Any questions pertaining to these results may be asked
by calling the Soil Testing Lab.
UMASS EXTENSION· Working Partrr•"------------~
1-1t-,..,,..-!'\\;-11t,.,-. Onp;-wn.w--0-1 "Oto-c:i.11Ut-•_coo_oer_1~-l"Q-. u-ni-v.,-s11Y,.-of_M_aa.;..1-~-C:llftt'rtlOI' offtrt ""~ ~~ 111 P1aor•1111 Md •tMIO¥.....,.. ftnnMCI "" '~ :i;ioier 0
~I
"D
c
G)
a.
a.
<
r I
~f
{
o
o
3
\:>~e.Qs~v._+
Se
c
t
i
o
n
II
.
In
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
of Hydrology
Hy
d
r
i
c
So
i
l
In
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
1.
So
i
l
Su
r
v
e
y
----------·------~-·---.----.. ------···· -----------1 r 1 r r t-\i\\ ~Jos 'Bca.V"veit ~. ) trB~2.. /o-1-=t -91-RC.. L Other Indicators of Hydrology: (check alt that apply and describe) 0 Site inundated: 0 D Depth to free water in observation hole: 7 [).I' 0 Depth to soil saturation in observation hole: 7/~11 r··
Is
th
e
r
e
a
pu
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
so
i
l
survey for this site? ® no
ti
t
l
e
/
d
a
t
e
:
0 Water marks: No (
ma
p
nu
m
b
e
r
:
so
i
l
ty
p
e
ma
p
p
e
d
:
hy
d
r
i
c
so
i
l
in
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
:
Ar
e
fi
e
l
d
ob
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
consistent with soil survey?
Re
m
a
r
k
s
:
2.
So
i
l
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Ho
r
i
z
o
n
De
p
t
h
Matrix Color
o
0•
'
5
"
-
o
-
A
o~
~
:J,-;y3h
B
4-
1
2
~. '.:y 3/~
Re
m
a
r
k
s
:
s
(, j
~-r--r to..+i \A-eS~
3.
Ot
h
e
r
:
sd
+
(oct\.'V\
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
:
Is
so
i
l
hydric? yes yes no Mottles Color -No A.JC-/V(JN-r5 §) 0 Drift lines: : 1) D Sediment deposits: ND 0 Drainage patterns In BVW: Alt) 0 Oxidized lhizospheres: f)<.) D Water-stained leaves: AJi> 0 Recorded data (stream, lake, or tidal gauge; aerial photo; other) : __ No111r D Other: I Vegetation and Hydrology Conclusion K yes no i Number of wetland indicator plants ~number of non-wetland indicator plants D E:f j Wetland hydrolO{ly present: hydric soil present D ~ other indicators of hydrology present D w Sample location Is In a BVW D w-I Sublnil "'1• fonn wtth lhe Reque•I for Determination ofAppllc•blllty or Notice of Intent. C/I 'ti c .! -II ~ "D II -Ill -II °' ~ OI c 1:: II "D ,~ OI c = Ill II .E ~ I~
I Co
(
l
n
ti""
'
•
"'
(
h
I ,-,
r -,-
,
-<
I -·
1.r
.
II
'i
.
l
•.
(
•
'"
r·1
I ... •o
0 ~
.!
]
")
_J
".'
"
!
c -....
.. ,.
~
--'.
)
'-
"
" "
..:1
~
-rs
[L
IL
u.
((
I
Ii"
•
(·
(
-<
[-·~.
;,
,
....
I
IJ
•
,,
T
-<
c cu
.s:
:
.
~
...
.
<1
)
c
·-~
~
r
Gr
a
i
n
Size Distribution Curve So;f & Plam 7'is.Tue Testing l..aborawry West /i.xpertment Station UnfrersilJ• ofMa1stJch11.telts
3"
2"
I" 3/4" 3/8" N4 ii f O #50 # l-00 ~200 Amherst, M.A 01003-8010
10
0
-
:
:
-
i
,
.
J
-
T
L
.
_
1_.J_ --rn-~~---J-~--~---t----r.11,-,-·.-J-..-l-l _ __J ___ r __ ~------1·-, r-,-----.. -. ··-1
:::~:
:
. ~ : . ;--~-... ;__ l ~ f i f : . ' ' f ~ ; ! ~ !
-
i
i
;
.
i
. ! • ~ I • i i -~, l I ! . ' I ' l i . . . t ~ :
•
:
'
.
j
:
•
• • : i : . I • "\. I I ; i ' ~ ~ . ; I I . I ; :
~~-! i
'
i
:
:
' ; ':I . ~: i . Ii,· l . I:':: 1' ; 1' I l , I i ;
I
• j f J ' . ' I. I. • j:: t
90
-
-
~,·
-
~
-
c
-
-
;
-
!
-
'
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
t
l
-
Y
-
;
_
·
-
--,-i---'';I r--·------~i--1,-:-r-; . ;.-r-t+---·-.
.
.
I
!
'
;
:
: ! . . ~ ; : J ! ~ i I J ! : ' : : ' I i f f j ! ~ ; I
: l
i
~ .
!
!
i
~ : ; i ' : . I i I · I : : ' ; . l i i ' l . i . j ' ; !
'1
'
;
:
; ! .: I:. i : 1' ·. t : i . ,, : I I i -+I I l . I
:.:
~
i
.
;
I '. ~ I I ; : . ' J -~ ~ i j ~ ~ ! I
so
-1
·
;
_
.
1
--
r
-
-
·
-
1--
-
r
-
--_-·---·-r'. ·T: +-T· --T--·---1 -~------~+1i·-· -: .. --r. -.---,1---.. -·---·--·---··-
:
:
;
'
'
:
!
, : : , l' ! ' ! . ! l I • ! ! ' ·i; J 1 i . : ' i ! 1) ' :
:
!
:
'
'
,. ' ; i I ' i ! '. I I i ; \i ! I f ! ! : . ; 1' I I : ; i '
.
·
·
'
I
I
' ., ! '. f ! '. \ l · 11.. . I 11 : j
: .•
,
.
.
I
.
f • It ; . I i . I . . . . ! ' I I .
•
~
.
I
!
? : ! : : I ~ f J I ! I . . J ! . I ! ~
70
j_~.
-
l
___
! ..
! --··~ ··-· --~• •-1-Lr-· ~--.. -· ··~lj__.__ --.. -~----· --'-----·-·-+-·-· ·i·----· -f•~-1-:--· ---·--·
3.
;
;
.
'
: i I . i : I,.! . : i i i l . I;. j • •
=
-
,
d
l
'
I
i
j
'
:
.. ,:, ·,· ! li· I!-., J I I I !lll:'
:
.
j
I
~
. ~ ; -I ; l ! -'\ ~ ; ! ; ! ' i ! ; ! I
:
:
I
:
!
• . 1· I! i ; I . , • I I .. 'I : I ! l ' I ;
•
.
I
I J ! . . I . • . I l I i
60
. -:.
:+
r-
:
-
-
·
-
:
-
.
----+ -------,-!-----~~:-----! ' . ··-":--i-'----.-~------t----i-----1
~:,
,
'
' ' "I . ' i ' ! l : \ ' r' i I :
•
J
1
, • I z f J I I f J I • • J ; "
-
.,
,
,
,
,
J":' ;•' ·-,11i I'• -.. I .,.jil,.
•
:
I
•
• I l ' ' I . f : ; \ • ; : , • I ' I f I ~ :
•
•
•
~
• • I ! I i I f ' ' -" ' l f i I I I I ' I I •
•
~ ;
I
I
r
; ! I : : I ; r : I \ ! I ' ! j i ; • : ! ! ~
50
:l~~-
+
-
-
-
<
_
-
~----~--·--+t-"------r-·--~..l.-~..,._.,.------r----4-•--.J..---__ ,
:I
..
,
.
:
; ! 1 1 : ~ i . . : 1 , .. : 1 r i ~ , 1 : i ·
-;
;
i
I
.
• I ! : • : I ~ : ' I I i : \ I I i ! ; : ; I '
•
I
• I I l 1 .. t '
~.'
.
; : ~ I" I I I . i •, I . . ' .
..
,:
·:
I
' . ' F,f,I • · · , I
40
-~J
.
l
.
!
.
__
_
• _ __;
___ ~-•-•: .. -t.1-_____ ;-·---"------• : I ·---------~+-----·----'-----t..:..!~:-------~-•----
=1
:
'
I' j.. i ' . I ~l . ~" ;.1
:
'
I
" • : ; ! ! i ! . " ~ ~ : ! 1 i :
'
'
' •. ! 'I. I 1\, .. I . ,
3
0
)
~---
--
-
-
------r; ~L---' -!--+--jt-~L--~_L_ ~----' ! __ '\--.!--~-----· -----:--------
• •
\
i
1
1
'. I i • 1 0 i ; i ~ i : f ! I \. 1 ~ f •
-J
.
:
l
·
... i;j·: ij l f,,..._; '
:-
f
·
:
·
,
: i'" I : ifl <.. ; , . . . I I j I' "" I •
::
..
:
.
I: i' ; : i . /' i ! ! 1 l ! l". I ; l . '
20
·
-
·
t
-
-
-
·
-
-
·
-
-
-
-
-
·
-----·-·-~ ·---~----4-H---------· ~r-----~--....,.----;~--·----------1
~:.
,
~. iii· ! • , 1::1; ·,,. r -"~l! ; .
:1
·.
.
'
.
J . ; ! I l f ! I . i ··-
.
· , . If I -.
10
-
·
·
-
-
-
'
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
---t·..------· --1-1-Li-~ ---l. ----· --1 --. --~--.--·---
:-:
.
,:
!
:::! I .j' . ' : . ~!Ii .
~1:
..
.
'
I
. 1 ·: . : . i t i . [I :
-
:
·, . ' I I . I . I ' ' . · I " I '
'.
.
' . . '. ' • I ; 11 I ' . I ; I
0
_:~i
i-
H
-
1
-
-
r
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
·
-
T
i
i t--··-~-~---t---f i-r+1-r·--r--i---;-n-h +•·-----,--,-, ·--,·-----"
1i
f
1~ 1~ 1~ 10~ 104
US
D
A
Te
x
t
u
r
a
l
Class: Sandy Loam Grain Size (mm) Assoc. Environ. Sci. 971003 Pheasant Hill Condo Bag#: 3461 l ( (
-
Ma•achulllllt• Certil'ice.Uoa M-MA 138 Connecticut Approval # PH 0777 Rhode I~d # 91 a Maine # n/a Naw Hlllll~ m # 2S3896 New York ID #11393 Florida HRS87+'1 Assoc. Envircmmer1tal Scientist P. 0. Box 979 Or.:tobt:r .JO, 1997 West Springfield, MA 01090
Attn: Tim Coo11
Client Project No.: 971003 Location: Pbea1ant Hill-Northampton, MA
Lah ID N.Q.. cuw 10 Apnlyaia Bfl(\ucated
AA.88.394 Sl $.m./.V~~Gtil• Oz~anics~PAH'6
P~lychla~~n•ted Biphenyl~
~#JI ~y .XR
~O~dl PPJJ Hoe~~s
>•.r-cen e Na tor
VoJ• c.tJa Solids
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES
11 Alm1.<r11n Drive• Apwam. Mll13chusetts01001 • 413-789-9018 • FAX 413-789-407~
10'd VOO"ON l~:St !6.0~ iJQ :131
-··~= "!#ls::lsE S ~Cl'RUI\-1 ANALYI'ICAL, INC. , '---" Laboratory Report ,___,, Client ID: St L(.lh TD No.:AA88394 Location: Plaeasant HilJ-Northampton, MA Client Job No.: 971003 Matrix: Sediment C-Ollected: 10/17 /97 by AES Received on 10120/97 , by MBR QC and Data ReVJew by PreseNative: RcfrjjJcration Container: 2 Olaa SOiJ Jan Condition of Samole aa Received: Satisfactory Delivered by: Client SemivolatHe Orpnics-PAH's
EPA Me1hod 8270
Parameter for AA88394 Result (uWl<g) MDL
Extracted Analyzed
Acenaphthcne Not detected 330.0 10/24197 10/27/97
Acenaphthy1ene Not detected 330.0 10124197 10127/97
Anthracene Not detected )30.0 10124/97 10/'21!91
Benzo (a) anthracene 650 330.0 10124191 10/27197
Benzo (b) fluoranthcne 660 330.0 10/24/97 10/27i97
Benzo (k) fluoranthenc 600 330.0 10/24/97 10127/97
Benzo (g,h,i) perylcne 400 330.0 10/24197 10/27197
Benzo (a) pyrcne 680 l30.0 10124191 10/27/97
Chrysene 810 3.10.0 10/24/97 10/27197
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Not detected 330.0 10/24/97 10(1.1197
Fluoranthene 1,700 330.0 10/24197 "IOf27/97
FJuorene Not detected 330.0 10/24197 10/27197
Indeno (l,2,3-cd) pyrene 430 330.0 10/24197 10127197
Naphthalene Not detected 330.0 10/24/97 10/27/97
Phenanthrcne 890 330.0 IOn.4197 10/27/97.
Pyrcne 1,200 330.0 ·10/24/97 10127197
2-MethyJnaphthaJene Not detected 330.0 10/24/97 10(}.7{97
% Solids 64.4 0.1 10f24/97 10/25/97
Aoalyll
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
ATP
........ ·-· ---~:CTRUM ANALY Laboratory ? '\\C. . '__,/ Client lD: SI Lab ID No: AA88394 Locai.:.>n: Pheasant Hiii-Northampton, MA Oient Job No: 971 OOC\ Matrix: Sediment Collected; 10/17/97 by AES Received llTI I 0/W/97 by MBR QC and Data Review by Preservatiw: Refri.aeration Container: 2 Glass S"oil Jars C.Ogdition of SQtple a.<1 Received: Sati~factory Deuvered by: Client
Polychlorlnated Blphenyls (PCB's)
SW846 Method 8080
Parameter Result (ur/Ka) MDL
Extracted Arudp.ed
-PCB-1016 Not detected 2SO 10(24/97 10124/97
PCB-1221 Nm detected l5<J 10124/97 10/24/97
PCB--1232 Not detected 250 10124/9'1 10124197
PCB-1242 Not detected ~o 10/24/9? lD/24/97
PCB-1248 Not detected 2SO 10124/97 10124/97
-PCB-12.54 Not detected 2!0 10124'97 ·10124197
PCB-1260 Not detected 250 10t24/97 10124/97
-Decachlorobiphcnyl ( % ) 76 10/24/97 10124/97
_ % Solids 64.4 0.1 10124/97 10/25/97
Ana~st
TG
TO
ro
TG
TG
TG
TO
TG
ATP
•
Client ID: SI Lah ID No.:AA88394 s: CTR UM ANAL Yl1CAL, INC. --.J ~ Laboratory Report Location: Pheasant Hiil-Northampton, MA Qient Job No.: 971003 Ptetervative: Refriaera1ion Matrix: Sediment Collected: 10/17197 by AES Received on 10/20197 by MBR QC and Data Review by ;tainer. 2 GI• S"oil Jars ndition of Sgi,Ple • Received: Satisfactory livered by: Oicnt
Parameter
TPHby IR
% Solids
Total Hydrocarbons by IR
EPA Method 418.1
Result (mz'Ka)
66
64.4
MDL
40
0.1
Extnctcd Ana~d Analyst
10/24197 10/29197 MN
10/24197 10125/97 ATP
\_;.CTR UM ANALYI1CAL. INC.~ Laboratory Report CHent ID: SI Lab ID No: AA88394 Matrix: Sediment C.Ollccted: 10/17/97 by AES Received on 10120(97 by MBR QC Md Data Rev1cw by Location: Pheasant Hill-Northampton, MA Qient Job No.: 971003 Preeervative: Refriecration Container : 2 Ola.as Soil Jars Omdition of SaJ!mle as Received: Satisfactory Delivered by: Cllent
Total Priority Pollutut 13 Metals
-Parameter Result (mt/Ka) MDL
Extracted A.aalyzcd
-Antimony Not detected 0.796 10/24/97 10/30/97
Arsenic Not detected t.S93 10/24/97 10/30/97
~Beryllium Not detected 1.593 10124/97 10/30/97
Cadmium Not detected 1~93 10124197 10/30197
Copper 13.7 1.593 10/24/97 10/30197
-Lead 57.7 0.796 10124197 10/30/')7
Mercury Not detected 0.320 10/24/97 10/30/97
Nickel 11.S 1.593 10(1.4/97 10/30197
-Selenium Not detected 0.196 10/24/97 10/.30/97
Silver Not detected 3.186 10/24/97 10/30197
Thallium Not detected 0.796 10124/97 10/30197
Zinc 52.6 1.593 10/24/97 10130197
Chromium 14.8 1.593 10/24/97 10130197
Amdyllt
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
UCTRUM ANALYI1 Laboratory Rcpc. ... ..,, ..__,.,, Client fD: SI Lah TD No: AA88394 Matrix: Sediment C'lllcctcd: 10/17/97 by AES Received on 10/20197 . by MBR QC and Data Review by Location: Pheasant Hill·Northampton, MA QientJob No.: 971003 Preservative: Re1fi8eration C:Omainer : 2 Glau Soil Jars C.Ondition of S~le as Received: Satisfactory Delivered by. Client Pem!lnt Water ('Jo)
Parameter Results(%) MDL
Extracted AnaJyzcd
-Percent Water 36.2 0.1 10/23/97 J0/23/97
Analyst
PX
Parameter
...... _ .......... .-.__._ ~CTRUM ANALYrlCAL, INC.~ Laboratory Report (Subcontracted Analyses) Client ID: St Lab TD No: AA88394 Matrix: Sediment Collected: 10fl7/C)7 by AES Rccci-,,cd on ion.or:n by MBR OC and Data Review by Location: Pheasant HUI-Northampton. MA Oicnt Job No: 971003 Preservative: Refri.aeration C.ontainer: 2 Olau Soil Jars Condition of Semple a.~ Received: Sati~factory Delivered by. Client Wet Chemistry Analyses
Start Date Analyst
_ Volatile Solids
Result
5.8
MDL
1.0
VDlt.s
%
Method
EPA 160.4 10!23191 PX
Spectrum Ana.lytiG&I, Inc. I..aboratory Report Supplement RcferenCC5 Methods for the Determination of Organic Compound1 in Drinking Wator. EPA-600/4-88/039. E.MSL 1988. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste::'!. EPA 600/4-79-020. EMSL 1983. Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wutcwatcr. EPA 600/4-82-057. EMSL 1982. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA SW-846. 1986. S tartdard Methods for the Examination of Water and W ut~. AP HA-A WW A -WPCF. 16th Edition. 1985.
Standard Methods for Comparison of Waterborne Petroleum Oils by Gas Chromatography. ASTM D 3328. 1982.
Oil Spill Identification System. U.S. Coast Guard CG·D-S2·77. 1977.
Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Watennd Wastewater Laboratories. EPA 600/4-79..019. EMSL 1979.
Choosing Cost-Effective QA/QC (Quality A38Uranoc/Quality Control) Programs for Chemical Analyses. EPA-
600/4-85/056. EMSL 1985.
Not Detected,
Not Det, ND or nd
NC
MCL
VOA
BFB
p-DFB
CLB-d5
BCP
TFT
Decachlorooiphenyl
-
-
=
d ... ..
..
Report Notations
,.
The compound w11s not: detected •t: " c:ondent.rdtion
equ4l to or abov~ the est•blished method detect:tcn
li.mit.
Nat Cdl~ul•ted
EPA N•ximum Cont4mln•tion Level
Vol•tile Org.sn1c An•lY$lS
4-SrOlllofJuorobenzsne (an EPA 624 surrogate)
J,4-Difluorobenzene tan EPA 624 Surrogate)
Chlorobenzens-d5 tan EPA 624 Surrogat•)
2-Bromo-1-chloropropane f•n EPA 601 Surro~ateJ
a, 11.,4-Trifluorot.oluene (•n EPA 602 Surro11at:eJ
(dn EPA &08/8080 surroga t:e)
Definitiorus
Surrogate Recovery = The recovery (expressed as a percent) of a non method analyte (see surrogates listed above)
added to the sample for the purpose of monitoring aystem perf'onnanc:e.
Matrix Spike R~oV«Y ~ The: recovery (exp.ressed as a percent) of method analytcs added to the sample for the
purpose of dctcnnining any effect of sample compotition on analyte recovery.
Laboratory Replicate = Two sample aliquots taken in the analytical laboratory and analyzed separately with
identical procedures. Analyses of laboratory duplicatca sive a measure of the p~sion associated with laboratory
procedure:s, but not with ~ample collcr.:Lion, pr~rvation, or storase procedu~.
Field Duplicate ::!! Two separate samples ~llectcd at the same· time and place under identical circumstances and
trcatcc.1 exactly the i1amc throughout field and laboratory procedures. Analysis of Field duplicata give a measure of the
precision associated with sample cotlectioc, preservation and storage, as well as with laboratory procedures.
Relative Pcrc:cut Diffcrcocc: (% RPD) =The precision measurement obtained on duplicate/replicate: anclly:ics.
%RPD is calculated a:i:
%RPO= (yalucl • valuM) • 100'/.
ave. value
--CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Page _L_ of _I_ SPECTRUM ANAi YT/CAL ~PROJECT NO.: tf' '7 I 0 0 J REPORT TO: /) f;_.f -r: 11 l. _SITE NAME: }!:Ji ,&.rr:.-~ Li.·;/ /1-d,. I LOCATION: Nd r. ...... ;f ...l. -STATE 111 A AOORESS: 7. 0. ~d°)( q7q , CITYW1r.J. fA,,"...i!:J.: ~IA ZIP Ol(J ~o -r-REFERENCE QUOTE NUMBER (AON): STATE tnA -d""7Q • ..,
PURCHASE ORDER NO.: INVOICE TO:
I <72. c.. ~ (YJ 1Ii'A~r2'~ I< J Qh>7# .. f PAOJECT Mgr:
1'TM Ir~~ CITY STATE ZIP SAMPLER(s):
SAMPLE TYPE & MATRIX. CODES: CONTAINERS VOC's svoc·s TPH METALS OTHER
1=4°C 2=HCI 3 .. H~so. 4 =I-INC, 5:0THEA -1 -Solublo "" I '·!-5 2 -Total I-!'.! S' u....;; ~ I V) ~ ~ <..i .... "' Q 3-TCLP
! ! ~ ~ ~ M t!1 M
i'C .. COMPOSITE G .. GRAB .... ~ ~ 8 :i xi~ ~ w ! ~ i M a ~ r= .....J ~ ..:, ~ N ~ ~ ff. ~ .... ~r-£ 1 .. AQUEOUS 3 =SLUDGE s .. oTHEA ! ~ ~ l,:j
)( ~ I ~ I ! ~ ~ N LL -
2 •SOIL 4=SEOIMENT 0 I I ::-N \;: . '3
2 I :ii ~ <ii a:> (j r:;;
~ ~ "@ ~ ~ .... ! s LAS USE Si ~ ~ u. I-~ u ::!t,. M ~ '~ ~
ONLY
c::> ~ to? !¥ ~ ~ SAMPLE 1.0. DATE TIME .... .... .... .... .... ,... .... -
~ ·X."A:3'ri S1 JO/r"l/t:-1 Ji' •. ;-4-e. J 2 J I I 2. -t ·~
, 'A">i.'.'.','.'.'.'
-~::::.·:::
);A..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'
'It;'.'.':.·:::
'7!fA' ••..••• . . . . . . . . .
'A~',·,·:.·:.·:
f:..'.·.·.·.·:::
'!;>..': ..• " ..•....
~· ....... . . . . . . . .
~::.·.·.·.·.·.·
·~>.::::.·:.·:
~·.·.·.·.·.·.·.· :»· ....... . . . . . . . . .
··-~·::: .·.·::
-/ r f.LINQUISHED BY: ~ /JFl!v1:i11r~D BY: _... ~ DATE TIME A_ ............ I~ -l\. ( ,,,.~,. c...rA_... I~ 7. Anc.;-..r~,,..., l;<l •1.t) .. y1 ~In
~ \ -'/ I ' ..._.
L5PECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: -4P' &f~CIAL t:t6NQLl~g: Please i Retum Sample attar Analysis check
Ciepoe• of Sample elt.,r 60 days
B$tandatd TAT • 7 10 10 Business days
CJ ~al TAT· 24 hr-48ht•12 hr-5 b.dlrfs • Tit: beGlna when tamplo Is rec:e....a at rosr f11e111ry.
~ Fax results when available to ( _ )
• TAT for Utn!ll•• rec:'d altor 3 pm wilt begin ori rho next busineu aay.
733 .. 4, ,, •All TAT'• ara subject to Jaoorarory appl'O'tal .Jnd cu.sromar consenr.
........__ p "1 0~-~ESULTS l\IEEl)f:D· Id· "'1..,q"J