08-054 252 cole meadows road planningiigitizei FORM A
�►.��ea NORTHAMPTON, MA
APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT
OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
File six completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Planning Board in accordance with the
requirements of Section 3.02.
I (we) believe that the attached plan of property in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the
meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that
Planning Board approval under the S Control Law is not required.
1. Ap plicant rent or : r
pp (print type): UL3D�lfE,� Signature:
Address: Z Z 0-0(-e5 I Ie4poAJ /ZA-O Phone:
2. Owner (print or type): SA Signature:
Address: Phone:
3. Surveyor (print or type): 44.0 f• - Signature: _
Z 3S /2vssr -6c 59+-7579
Address Phone
4. Deed or property recorded in Hampshire County Registry of Deeds or Land Court:
Book / 5 5 5 Page - /7 .
Location and Description of Property: f lop
6. Assessor's Map ID: 8 Lot(s): 5¢
Date Submitted for P nnin Date Planning oa d ��
Board Approval: Decision File `�
City Clerk (sign ture . City Clerk (signatur
(111M)
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - - -- -PAGE 60
jigitize'
FORM A
NORTHAMPTON, MA
APPLUCATI D J FOR O R QU RE APPROVAL
OF PLAN BELIEVE the City Clerk and the
completed f and plans and one mylar with 3.02*
cordance with
File five comp the requirements of Section
planning Board in ac
plan of his /her property
To the Planning
Board: p of the
that the a ccompanying the meaning and
division within determination
The undersign s not ed believing for a
ton doe $ bmits s plan Law is not
Control
in the City of Nort Law, her
Subdivision ewith Subdivisio
Control Board approval under the
endorsement that Planning
require
as.c1. Kvb oSick
,.�ar Sig ature
1. Appli print or type name 1� 584_�p�°�
Npr \gym Dh
Phone
Address `(�b H � °�
i Ros,�, Kvbos��k
Signatu e 2
2. owner a name 3
print o t ype
Phone
Address
ANn A SU NL Signature
3. Surveyor print or type name
Z3S �uSSFl -L S {LEES
phone
4
Address ` E C Deed or property recorded in 1
l9 ` ZS \ter
c�e�yr5 age Or � �
Book Property: ption of Prop l
p �o,, 0� �z
Location an d
D�o� - 'k bF-� n�j 0` P
5. OTC
M4�p
o r �t�5eS5 or S $ Lot
6. Assessor's Map IE
B and
Date Planning z ovember 2
Date submitted Planning
Decision Fil "'t Board App City Clerk: (Signa ur
City Cl erk: - - (Signatur
(8/13/91) —PAGE 60
SIIBDIVISION REGULATIONS --
-./
TO: File
FROM: Cynthia R. Williams, Conservation & Land Use Planner
DATE: May 12, 1998
SUBJ: Subdivision of land on Coles Meadow Road
On May 12, 1998 Wayne Feiden and Cynthia Williams met with Barbara Barker (584 -1010)
regarding the subdivision of land on Coles Meadow Road. We discussed the following as
options for creating legal building lot(s) for Henry and Rose Kubosiak:
1) Recombine lots and apply for a cluster development (this requires four contiguous
acres of land - of which 50% is dedicated open space).
2) Change property boundary to comply with lot depth requirements and:
a) tear down part of shed to meet setbacks; or
b) relocate shed in order to meet setbacks; or
c) include shed as part of first lot (Henry and Rose Kubosiak's lot)
3) Apply for a Variance to lot depth requirements on first lot; however, staff will
recommend that the Zoning Board does not approve this Variance. Zoning Board is a citizen
board and does not necessarily act on staff recommendations.
4) Exemption for dividing lots between existing buildings applies to structures built
before 1954.
N..i ...W
Office of Planning and Development "
City of Northampton �tgttiae� _
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 587 -1266
FAX (413) 587 -1264 • EMAIL planning@city.northamptoti.ma.us
-Conservation Commission -Historical Commission
-Planning Board • Housing Partnership
-Zoning Board of Appeals
DECISION OF
NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICANT:
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
Henry Kubosiak and Rose Kubosiak
262 Coles Meadow Road
Northampton, MA 01060
Henry Kubosiak and Rose Kubosiak
262 Coles Meadow Road
Northampton, MA 01060
RE LAND OR BUILDINGS IN NORTHAMPTON AT: 262 Coles Meadow Road
ASSESSOR'S MAP and PARCEL NUMBERS: MAP 8 PARCEL 54
At a meeting conducted on September 2, 1998, the Northampton Zoning Board of
Appeals voted 2:0 with one abstention (Snyder) to DENY the request of Henry Kubosiak and
Rose Kubosiak for a VARIANCE to allow a lot which does not meet the lot depth
requirement of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance at 262 Coles Meadow Road.
Zoning Board Members present and voting were: Chair Mark NeJame, Larry Snyder and
Associate Member Bill Brandt.
In DENYING the request for a Variance, the Zoning Board of Appeals found:
There are circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape or topography especially
affecting such land or structure but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it
is located.
2. A literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or
otherwise, to the applicant. However, the hardship was self - created because the
nonconforming lot was created by the applicant by the recordation of an Approval Not
Required (ANR) plan which included a lot which did not meet the lot depth requirement
of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Relief could be granted without detriment to the public good, however, the granting of
this variance would substantially diminish the intent and purpose of the Ordinance.
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws (MGL), Chapter 40A, Section 11, no Variance, or any
extension, modification or renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision bearing
the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed after the decision has been
filed, or if such an appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the
Hampshire County registry of Deeds or Land Court, as applicable and indexed under the
name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The fee
for such recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. It is the owner or
applicant's responsibility to pick up the certified decision from the City Clerk and record it at the
Registry of Deeds.
The Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals hereby certifies that a Variance has been DENIED
and that copies of this decision and all plans referred to in it have been filed with the Planning
Board and the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 15, notice is hereby given that
this decision is filed with the Northampton City Clerk on the date below.
If anyone wishes to appeal this action, an appeal must be filed pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A,
Section 17, with the Hampshire County Superior Court or the Northampton District Court--and
notice of said appeal filed with the City Clerk within twenty days (20) of the date that this
decision was filed with the City Clerk.
APPLICANT: Henry & Rose Kubosiak - 262 Coles Meadow Road
DECISION DATE: September 2, 1998
DECISION FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: September 28, 1998
'h9itizec 4 .
9k;ked
`,
Office of Planning and Development
City of Northampton
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 587 -1266
FAX (413) 587 -1264 • EMAIL planning@city.northampton.ma.us
-Conservation Commission -Historical Commission
-Planning Board • Housing Partnership
-Zoning Board of Appeals
Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals
Minutes of Meeting
September 2, 1998
�igitizec ,_,
The Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals held a meeting on Wednesday, September 2, 1998 at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Wallace J. Puchalski Municipal Building, 212 Main Street,
Northampton, MA.
Present were Members: Chair Mark NeJame, Larry Snyder and Associate Member William Brandt.
Staff. Senior Planner John Bennett and Board Secretary Laura Krutzler.
NeJame called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. NeJame introduced the members of the Board and
recessed the regular meeting in order to open the first public hearing. NeJame read the notices
advertising tonight's hearings and explained the procedure he would use in conducting the hearings.
At 7:14 p.m., NeJame opened the Public Hearing on a request filed by Henry Kubosiak and Rose
Kubosiak for a Variance from the requirements of Section 6.2 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow
a lot which does not meet the lot depth requirement of 200 feet for property located at 262 Coles
Meadow Road, also known as Assessor's Map 8, Parcel 54.
Donald W. Miner of Harold L. Eaton & Associates presented the application on behalf of the
Kubosiaks, accompanied by the applicants' attorney, Donna Mansfield of 114 Main Street,
Northampton, and the applicants' daughter. As background, Miner explained that the Kubosiaks
had previously owned property on Damon Road, which was taken twenty -five years ago for the
industrial park. Miner said that the Kubosiaks then purchased seventy -five acres on Coles Meadow
Road and moved their demolition business to the site and built a house there. He explained that,
since then, the Kubosiaks had sold some building lots to enable them to build a new house and had
given their children parcels of land to build houses for themselves.
With regard to the Variance request, Miner explained that, earlier this year, the Kubosiaks hired-
Eaton & Associates to prepare a plan to allow them to give a piece of property including a workshop
and a garage to their son Edward. He noted that, because of zoning requirements, [the prepared plan]
had to include a side setback [from the workshop] of ten feet. He noted that the plan was prepared
with the intent of also creating a lot to be given to the Kubosiak's daughter and with the intent that
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Nftalle
...-
'iigitizet- -
remaining land would be given to their tvVms s He reported that the plan was reviewed and signed
by the Planning Board and recorded [at the Registry of Deeds].
Miner informed members that when he went to set the iron pins, they fell in a slightly different
location [than shown on the original plan], so he was asked to prepare a revised plan. When the
revised plan went before the Planning Board, it was determined that the property containing the
parent's house did not meet zoning requirements because it did not meet the two hundred foot depth
requirement at the place where the principal structure was located. (The depth was about seven feet
short.) Miner said that when the issue came to light, people went to the Planning Department and
also checked in the Registry of Deeds. Miner alleged that the plan on record at the Registry was
different from what was signed because the record plan included a notation that, "This is not a
building lot,... " Miner said he did not know how or why, but the plan had been altered.
Miner explained that the Kubosiaks intend to keep the property so that Henry has a place to live and
to [eventually] give the lot to their daughter.
Variance Criteria.
In support of the Variance, Miner noted that the property is complex in that the entire parcel has a
wide range of topography, including wetlands and areas now flooded because of beavers in -Broad
Brook. He noted that the property also had an area of ledge which restricted where the owners could
put a house, adding that the Kubosiaks felt that these were reasons the Board could grant relief.
Miner indicated that the structures could not be moved because there was rock ledge which would
prevent excavation.
Miner further stated that, "Unconsciously, an illegal lot has been created, and we feel that a Variance
is not going to be detrimental to any of the parties." He observed that there was a hardship on the
family right now, as they were "very very distressed_by this issue." Rose Kubosiak is presently in
a nursing home, and the Kubosiaks "just want to get [the situation] cleaned up," Miner said.
Members asked questions to clarify the information which had been presented. In response, Miner
presented the following additional information:
- - -- The lot depth in the area of the house is one hundred and ninety -three (193) feet.
Miner indicated that the owners could not alter this line because doing so would
create a zoning violation on the other side.
Brandt asked why the Kubosiaks don't tear the workshop down?
Miner responded that the structure is used by the family for maintaining and repairing their vehicles.
Bennett explained that when a Form A plan is submitted, the Planning Board is limited to looking
only at the frontage and is not able to consider other zoning requirements. As a general rule, when
there is something that looks questionable, the Planning Department puts a stamp on the plan stating
that "The Planning Board has made no determination as to conformance of this lot with the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance." Bennett said that such a stamp did not get applied to this plan.
2
Miner added that, as a courtesy, staff also usually contact the surveyor involved, and this was not
done in this situation.
Bennett commented that the error was not caught at the surveying level or the review level, so [the
plan] went through.
In response to a question from Brandt, Bennett confirmed that detached accessory structures require
a ten -foot setback in Rural Residential districts.
Saying he wanted more information about the financial hardship, Brandt asked how expensive it
would be to cut off the back of the workshop and put up a new wall?
Miner responded that he did not know that there was a financial hardship. He clarified that the
hardship was the result of the ill feelings created by this situation. However, he added that, if the
Variance was not granted, there would be a financial hardship in that the applicant would have to
file a lawsuit against the City of Northampton, the Zoning Board of Appeals, etc.
Miner pointed out that the applicant does not own the structure anymore, so he has no legal rights
to do anything. He informed members that, not only was the plan been recorded, but the father and
mother already conveyed the piece of property, so they had no legal rights t �� titer it
Scallixt . 1
NeJame asked if there were any public comments? h91hZe _.
qt�: Kea
Donna Mansfield, the attorney for Henry and Rose Kubosiak, confirmed that the Kubosiaks
deeded the property to their son and daughter -in -law on March 13th. She reported that the elder
Kubosiaks attempted to enter into negotiations with their son and daughter -in -law to'redeed the
property back to correct the problem. Also, Henry Kubosiak was willing to demolish the building,
but the son has refused, she said. Mansfield advised members that the situation has been a financial
and emotional hardship on the Kubosiaks, leading to them be hospitalized and on medication. The
Kubosiaks went through the appropriate process to have the plan approved, but now, unfortunately,
the land is out of their control, she commented. Mansfield said that if the Board denied the Variance,
the Kubosiak's only avenue would be to file suit to try to get the deed nullified based on fraudulent
representation. She emphasized that no one wanted to go that route, as it would be very costly for
everyone involved. She explained that, unfortunately, Edward Kubosiak did not want to demolish
a perfectly good structure (the workshop). Also, the property has rock ledge, so if the structure is
demolished, it is questionable how much money it would take to rebuild. She stressed that it would
be a tremendous financial hardship if the Zoning Board denied the Variance.
Debra Hoynoski of 206 Coles Meadow Road stated that she saw no reason why a Variance should
not be accorded in this case.
Barbara Barker of 247 Coles Meadow Road, the Kubosiak's daughter, expressed support for
the Variance. She commented that her parents were very upset about this, and "being in their
eighties, they should not have to go through this."
3
on
M
NeJame asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition? No one spoke.
NeJame remarked that he had been doing research on Variances today, and one thing that was very
clear was that, if someone created their own hardship, they were not entitled to a Variance. He noted
that this seemed to be the case here, since the Kubosiaks created the [nonconforming] lot. NeJame
commented that he felt emotionally like the Variance should be granted, but, legally, [the
application] did not meet the requirements because [the nonconformity] was self - created.
Brandt asked to discuss this point. He questioned whether the nonconformity was self - created with
knowledge, in particular, whether the applicant created the lot with the knowledge that it was not a
building lot?
NeJame discussed the process of Form A approval. He noted that the applicant submits a plan and
asks the Planning Board to sign off on it. He pointed out that approval of the plan is required if the
lot meets the criteria in terms of frontage and lot size. He suggested that the plan did not show the
nonconforming dimension of one hundred and ninety -three feet and commented that he did not see
any culpability on the part of the Planning Board in approving the plan.
In response to another question from Brandt, NeJame and Bennett confirmed that the burden [of
insuring that the lot met all zoning requirements] was on the applicant.
Bennett noted that the plan was filed in March. He advised members that there had been a lot of
effort to try to resolve the situation short of Variance and that staff had thoroughly explained to the
applicant that a Variance was hard to achieve. He noted that considerable effort had been expended
in trying to redraw the plan and knock off part of the garage, but all to no avail. Bennett added that
it was also explained that staff could not recommend granting the Variance5cd,,,,, '
tngn tize� -
Brandt asked what the alternatives were if the Variance was denied? r �,� ; geo
Mansfield said the Kubosiaks would be filing suit against the City, Eaton & Associates and Edward
& Shirley Kubosiak. Mansfield told ZBA members that the Planning Department also explained to
Rose that the Planning Department had the right to throw the couple out of their home of twenty -five
years because technically the lot was not a building lot.
Regarding whether the hardship was self - created, Mansfield argued that the Kubosiaks were "a
couple in their 80's who went through all the appropriate steps known to them" to be in compliance.
She noted that the issue would not have come up except that Henry wanted to deed property to his
daughter and discovered the notation "This is not a building lot" on the plan at the registry. She said
they then approached the Planning Department to try to get the plan approved in the most expedient
and inexpensive way possible.
Mansfield stressed that the situation had really been a drain on the Kubosiak's, noting that they tried
to divide up their property to deed it to their children and did not realize that they were going about
it in an inappropriate manner.
- Ioynoski pointed out those present "were only talking about seven feet."
4
'"
.Mw
NeJame commented that, had the Kubosiaks known from the start, they would have done something
about the garage, and this would all be moot. However, Miner countered that they would not have
been able to do anything. He pointed out that the section of the Zoning Ordinance in question was
"clouded under definitions." The Kubosiaks would not have been able to divide off the lot to meet
zoning regulations, Miner stated.
Hoynoski commented that she thought the nonconformity was self - created by error. She pointed out
that people hire professionals to do what they were supposed�nd that she thought there were
gray areas here. iigitizec.
NeJame related an example of a similar case that he had been reading that day, where parents wanted
to chop off a piece of land so that their son or daughter could have a building lot. The parents
created a lot, but when they went to build on it, they discovered that they had created a
nonconforming lot. The parents went to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Board granted a
Variance, but somebody appealed the Variance, and the case was overturned. There were very
similar facts in the two cases, he observed.
Mansfield pointed out that there did not seem to be a threat of anybody appealing this from the
audience. She added that there was no damage being done to anybody at this point except the
applicant.
NeJame commented that, as far as the City being a defendant, he thought [an appeal] would be
dismissed right away.
Mansfield countered that the applicants were before the Board on the advice of the City Solicitor
Brandt said that he had trouble because the lot was only created several months ago, presumably
with good advice. He said he did see the hardship as self - created, although not by the applicant but
by their advisors. He continued that he thought it set a bad precedent to start granting variances
where there was a self - created hardship, because it would not stand up in a court of law. He added
that he thought maybe the matter did belong in a court of law.
Snyder moved to close the public hearing. Brandt seconded. The motion passed unanimously
3:0.
Brandt stated that he would have to vote against the application, because he could not grant a
Variance since he thought [the hardship] was self - imposed.
Barker asked who they thought created the hardship?
Brandt answered that it was not without a heavy heart which he acted, but he did not think the
request met the criteria because the hardship was self - created.
Brandt moved to deny the application. Snyder seconded. The motion passed 2:0 with one
abstention (Snyder).
R
5 , iig�� ize
L!
Office of Planning and Development "iigir izec _.
City of Northampton I Kea
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 587 -1266
FAX (413) 587 -1264 • EMAIL planning@city.northampton.ma.us
*Conservation Commission *Historical Commission
-Planning Board • Housing Partnership
-Zoning Board of Appeals
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Northampton Zoning Board of Appeals will hold a meeting on Wednesday, September 2, 1998
at 7:00 P.M. in Council Chambers, Wallace J. Puchalski Municipal Building, 212 Main Street,
Northampton, to conduct Public Hearings on the following:
- - -- Public Hearing on a request filed by Daniel Curylo and Laurel Curylo for a Finding to
extend a pre - existing nonconforming structure under Section 9.3 (1)(D) of the Zoning
Ordinance for property located at 50 Grant Avenue, Northampton, also known as
Northampton Assessor's Map 25C, Parcel 112.
- - -- Public Hearing on a request filed by Henry Kubosiak and Rose Kubosiak for a Variance
from the requirements of Section 6.2 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a lot which does not
meet the lot depth requirement of 200 feet for property located at 262 Coles Meadow
Road, also known as Assessor's Map 8, Parcel 54.
- - -- Public Hearing on a request filed by Kevin G. Keilty for a Finding to extend a structure
on a pre - existing nonconforming lot by under Section 9.3 (2)(3) of the Zoning Ordinance
for property located at 21 Longview Drive, Florence, also known as Assessor's Map 36,
Parcel 145.
PUBLISH: August 19, 1998 and August 26, 1998.
BILL: Office of Planning and Development, Account #71350
210 Main Street, Northampton, MA 01060
08/13/98 12:48 x$'94135871264 NORTHAMPTON, MA
ACTIVITY REPORT
TRANSMISSION OK
TX /RX NO.
3773
CONNECTION TEL
95855222
CONNECTION ID
START TIME
08/13 12:47
USAGE TIME
00'52
PAGES
1
Q001
RRSrrr T nK
vJD-- h
- M- EM0- R- A-NDUM
TO: Mark NeJame, Chair, Zoning Board of Appeals g`zt.l Sg
FR: Samuel B. Brindis, P.E., Director, Department of Public Works
DA: August 25, 1998
RE: File # 98 -V -9 262 Coles Meadow Road
CC: file
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the above referenced application for the following items:
Traff c:
Volume & Impact on City Street
X Roadway Capacity
Adequacy of City Road Construction
Site Distances
Parking
Driveway Openings
Utilities:
Drainage Into City Stormwater System
Capacity of Stormwater Line
Sanitary Sewer
Water
Other:
The Department of Public Works has the following comments:
_X No Concerns, project will not have an impact on any items reviewed
Traffic Study is required
Roadway does not have adequate capacity to handle the additional traffic
Roadway is not adequately constructed to handle proposed increase in traffic
Site Distances are not adequate for proposed project
Parking spaces do not meet minimum requirements
Parking spaces are too close to driveway opening
Driveway openings are not adequate for proposed use
City stormwater system is not adequate to handle increase in drainage
Stormwater system does not meet minimum requirements for reduction of Total
Suspended Solids (TSS)
Sanitary Sewer line is not adequately sized for proposed use
Sewer line connection is not properly shown
Water line is not adequately sized for proposed use
Water line connection is not properly shown
Other Comments:
r
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
-11V "
S(:di1t�� A o tt � I
•atgt1i _ CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
VARIANCE APPLICATION
AUG - 6 1998
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
NORTHAM MA 01060
Applicant's Name: HENRY & ROSE KUBOSIAK
Address: 262 Coles Meadow Road Phone: (413) 584 -0324
Parcel Identification: Zoningg Map # 8 Parcel #'s 54 Zoning District RR
Street Address: 26Z Co 1 es Meadow R
Status of Applicant X Owner;
Other (explain)
Property Owner's Name:
Address:
hone:
VARIANCE is requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 6 . 2 Page -
Describe proposed work and/or project (use additional sheets if necessary):
No work will be done on the property. The variance is that the lot
be allowed as per th plan approved by the Planning Board.
7. Attached Plans: Sketch Plan Site/Plot Plan X None Required
How does the proposed work and/or project comply with the Variance Criteria listed below:
(See: "Applicant's Guide" for assistance to filling out the questions listed below)
A. Are there circumstances relating to soil conditions, shape or topography of the land or structures
(where the variance is being requested) that effects only this property/structure, and not other
properties in the neighborhood?
NO * (see note at bottom of page)
YES _ X If yes, explain what condition(s) exist:
The Planning Board on 3/6/98 approved a plan submitted by the o wn e rs.
— determined that the parcel retained bV the owners was not in co mpllance
with zoning reguirements
B.(1) Would a literal enforcement of the Zoning Requirements create a hardship, financial or otherwise?
e
* If this is checked, you may not qualify under the statutory requirements for a Variance, but have the
right to apply to the Board of Appeals for relief from any requirement within the Zoning Ordinance.
same
Contract Purchaser; Lessee
NO * (see note at bottom of page)
VRS X If ves. explain below:
..mole
(2) If a Variance is not granted, would the applicant be denied all use of the propert
SCdilllt ,
NO X * (see note at bottom of page) �aigiti
YES If yes, explain below: _ zet
ig i t i eet
(3) Is the hardship self - created?
YES * (see note at bottom of page)
NO — X If no, explain below:
rawn.
C. (1) Can relief be granted without detriment to the public good? YES X NO
(2) If granted, would the variance nullify or substantially derogate from the intent or purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance?
YES * (See note at bottom of page)
NO X If no, explain why, below:
his is not a request for build or changing the physical
>iti n of the property. It involves a variance of e depth requirement
W' to 193'. The neighborh would no a narmed in anyway.
D. Is your request for the smallest relief possible?
NO * (see note at bottom of page)
YES X If yes, explain below:
Th� variance req uest asks that the lot as approved by the
Plannina'Board be allowed This does not crea e a ar s ip on anyone
9. Is a Certified Abutter's List attached? YES X NO (if checked no, the application
will not be accepted).
10. I hereby certify that I have read the "Applicant's Guide for Complying with Variance Criteria", and that
the information provided in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
DATE: APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE:
Print name here:
DATE: 8/4/98 OWNER'S SIGNATURE (if not the applicant)
Printnamehere: Henry & Rose Kubosi
Aly
* If this is checked, you may not qualify under the statutory requirements for a Variance, but have
the right to apply to the Board of Appeals for relief from any requirement within the Zoning
Ordinance. A W y, 01 ,on 7z e�o�
0 y / e - ,i- rn�n�sf�r20
my molly ,Sr4 e-er
* ...i
File # MP -1999 -0005
APPLICANT /CONTACT PERSON Henry Kubosiak
ADDRESS/PHONE 262 Coles Meadow Road (413) 584 -0324 ()
PROPERTY LOCATION 262 COLES MEADOW RD
MAP 08 PARCEL 054 ZONE R
- jigitizet
*kt :, Keo
THIS SECTION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:
PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
REQUIRED DATE
Building Permit Filled out
Fee Paid
Type of Construction:
New Construction
Non Structural interior renovations
Addition to Existing
Accessory Structure
Building Plans Included:
Owner/Occupant Statement or License #
3 sets of Plans / Plot Plan
THE FOLLOWING ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN ON THIS APPLICATION:
Approved as presented/based on information presented.
V Denied as presented:
Special Permit and/or Site Plan Required under: §
PLANNING BOARD ZONING BOARD
Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
Finding Required under: §
w /ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
Variance Required under: § 1� -_Z. _ w/ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ®0es_z
Go7 O��Tr/ Zao '
Received & Recorded at Registry of Deeds Proof Enclosed
Other Permits Required:
Curb Cut from DPW Water Availability Sewer Availability
40 =f Well Water Potability
• %. x � ,`� Board of Health
Permit from Commission
Signature of BuildAj Official Date
Note: Issuance of a Zoning permit does not relieve a applicant's burden to comply with all zoning
requirements and obtain all required permits from Board of Health, Conservation Commission,
Department of public works and other applicable permit granting authorities.
..00
FORM A
NORTHAMPTON, MA
�rgttize� -
Kea APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT
OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
File six completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the Planning Board in accordance with the
requirements of Section 3.02.
I (we) believe that the attached plan of property in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the
meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that
Planning Board approval under the S Control Law is not required.
,/ r
1. Applicant (print or type): /1L Nl�V' U[VOS/Ae Signature:
Address: Z Z ` - Le-_s lt*�e400'4-) AZA -0 Phone:
2. Owner (print or type): S,4-,olQ Signature:
Address: Phone:
Surveyor (print or type) Signature .�
Z .3S/2uss� t� /� AOL�c�/ &r8l- -759 9
Address Phone
4. Deed or property recorded in Hampshire County Registry of Deeds or Land Court:
Book �eS Page
Location and Description of Property:
"J/
h.gitl !� O pt/ /l1
6. Assessor's Map ID: 8 Lot(s): 5¢
Date Submitted f or P nnin Date Planning Board
Board Approval: c IyYd ��Deciision File
City Clerk (sign ture . a City Clerk (signatur
('1/1%98)
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS -------- PAGE 60
33.7'
�
O
to
CA
�p N
J Cri
W O
m
s
10.5'
IMR
W
O O
►00 O
N
J.
L 29,1 '
..✓
N 61'29'10" E 200.00' ---- --
HENRY P. AND ROSE S. KUBOSIAK
LOT 1
44520 + /- SQ. F7,
1-0220+/-, ACRES
PORTION OF BOOK 1585, PAGE 67
SEE: PLAN BOOK 174, PAGE 234
--- S 61'29,' 10" W
203.71'
EDWARD W. AND SHIRLEY M. KUBOSIAK
4 BOOK 4123, PAGE 77
SEE: PLAN BOOK 63, PAGE 69 - LOT #10
SEE ALSO: PLAN BOOK 174, PAGE 234
N
N q
cn O
QD
o
i
L
06
O to
�n
o O
l o
s
m
1
E A�L 0T
JUL 2 1
€?EFT OF 8N0,! 3,; ;!,?E%
f2 1
File NO Scait"'L ' — / 410 ��g�
�igtfize
3NG PEMMff T APPLLCATXON
PLF�SE TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORI-flITION
1. Name of Applicant: Henry & Rose Kubosiak
Address: 262 Coles Meadow Road Telephone: 413 - 584 -0324
2. Owner of Property: Same
Address: Telephone:
:3. Status of Applicant: X Owner Contract Purchaser Lessee
Other (explain):
4. Job Location: 262 Coles Meadow Road
Parcel Id: Zoning Map # Parcel# District(s):
(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT)
5. Existing Use of Structure/Property_ Single Family Residence
6. Description of Proposed Use/Work/Project/Occupation: (Use additional sheets if necessary):
Make lot conform to zoning. Sub - division of land made lot of 2 Col(
Meadow Road Non - Conforming by error. E rror not caught by Planning
Dept. or Surveyor
7. Attached Plans: Sketch Plan Site Plan X Engineered/Surveyed Plans
Answers to the following 2 questions may be obtained by checking with the Building Dept or Planning Department Files.
8. Has a Special PermitNatiance/Finding ever been issued for /on the site?
NO X DON'T KNOW YES IF YES, date issued:
IF YES: Was the permit recorded at the Registry of Deeds?
NO DON'T KNOW YES X
IF YES: enter Book Page and /or Document #
9. Does the site contain a brook, body of water or wetlands? NO X DON'T KNOW YES
IF YES, has a permit been or need to be obtained from the Conservation Commission?
Needs to be obtained Obtained , date issued:
(FORM CONTINUES ON OTHER SIDE)
10. Do any signs exist on the property? YES NO X
IF YES, describe size, type and location:
Are there any proposed changes to or additions of signs intended for the property? YES NO X
IF YES, describe size, type and location:
I1- ALL INFORMATION MUST BE COMPLETED, or PERMIT CAN BE DENIED DUE TO
LACK OF INFORMATION.
This cola to be tilled in
by the Building DePnrtment
1.11dZ zne - inrormation contained herein
G is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
DATE: July 1, 1998 APPLICANT 's SIGNATURE '
NOTE: Issuance of a zoning permit does not relieve an appiioanv= u t wit
zoning requirements and obtain ail re uired
4 permits from the Board of Health, Conservation
CCommisslon, 13 epartment of Publio Works and other applicable permit granting authoritjos
FILE I
Existing
Proposed
Kequired i
By Zoning
Lot size
44520 Sq . Ft.
Frontage
226.39 Ft.
Setbacks - frnnt
-side
L. , __79- R: 9p.
t: R•
a C3
-rear
29'
Building height
Bldg Square footage
%Open Space:
(Lotarea minus bldg
&paved parksng)
V
# Pf - Parking spaces
# of Loading Docks
Fill:
.4 vOl -ume - -& location)
I3 _ C'Prti fir -at; r
s,_ _L_
1.11dZ zne - inrormation contained herein
G is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
DATE: July 1, 1998 APPLICANT 's SIGNATURE '
NOTE: Issuance of a zoning permit does not relieve an appiioanv= u t wit
zoning requirements and obtain ail re uired
4 permits from the Board of Health, Conservation
CCommisslon, 13 epartment of Publio Works and other applicable permit granting authoritjos
FILE I
's 1. dittx. p
IIgtitze.
qty,, Kea
v\
N
i.i
G�
w
w
0
0
H
b
d
o
cl
O
A
w
W
V a
b N ^d
N d
bq
v+
O
a
a O
Gn �
� O
GltAki *90,
1...
O O O. 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
1 C14
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
z O O o z O z z z z z z z p z z z z z O z z z z z
O z O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O
9 0 �� x x z x x x� x� x x x a x x x x x a s as as w as
O g 0 0 0 0 0 O rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
z 0 z z z z z z z M z z z z z z z z z z z z z
x
3 ° z 3 3 3 3 3 3 W 3 w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O R 3 3 3 3 x 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q O q O O O H O O O O O
w W W W W W W N �
a xxaaaaaa�a�aaa�,aaaaa aaa.a a
o z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0
�O O O O [- 00 M M V'1 C� r- H O O "O 00 N O --+ O V'1 C� 1 10 [- It
7 - N N V'1 It O N V'1 V'1 O 't� .--+ O M O M n 00 00 00 .--+
N M P. M M M N N N M M M M N N N N M 7
azU
QQ ¢ z w a
o Q W O cn Q z a
w0 � x x C7 0' v0 Z � � :d o W t'
cn z zzi c4 w w � 8 a u U U Z 9 A¢ x z P 3 q¢
O O O¢ W 0 0� w `� `r' x O O rw Q Z a U
F"a AW w x w` w �Wa
c7 C H Q rw CA� c7 Q 3 Z O Z a� ¢
`�0000¢ z oo u x ao x
000 W W O z w 0 0�� ¢� 0 O W 0 ¢ O
z > >wasasasUwQ7 x xx� aa � ' a � 33
arx rxrxrx a aa.a; aa;aa;a a;rxaa; rx
0 0
q gq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O
0 owwowu�wowowu��w�'¢�www�wow�w� wow
O O O o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
x a x a U U a U U U a U a U U U U U U ° _U U a U U U U a
0 0 0 0� °� O N ,W) v 0 N 0 o 1n m o 0 v" o p o M 0 m r- 00 0 0
z U z U N N U M N M U M U M M N z N N M M M U N N N N U t
.--r .--+ - .--r .--+ - .--+ - .--r .--r .--r .--i .--r .--r .--r .--i .--r .--i .--i
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M V'1 N 1 .0 � V'1 O V'1 [- 7 r- O V'1 M 4 00 ON O\ M -
4'1 4'1 M M 4'1 O N N V'1 N 1 10 O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
[ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
rn
0�1
W
r
scannc-1,
digitizes
ehecked--
DEC ISION OF PnAr-r, APrEALS
At a pudic hearing of
the Boar of Appeals he •.d on APAIL 24, - 19?1
at in the Council Ro
City ,gall, Northampton, Massachusetts,
1: on the pet of HENRY & ROSE KUBOSIAK,,, 41 DAIMON ROAD
NORTHAMPTON,,
MASSACHUSETTS, for a varlatio&frow,the r*q ui
-rements"Of Secti it
u. PaEmm h W 4 of C414pter-44 of tbo d4t Or4i=----
08 Of the C ity
of Korthampton, for the parpose Of HA G
;ST KA
AND EQUIP
AR b
JtbW*x9WkxxXzk COLES MEADOW ROAD.
the Board voted unanimously t gra4k, t
'` j 0
DRAW WITHOUT PREJ ab*" MAU TO
1� -UDICE.
BOARD OF AppL4.LS
fAN
PLEAS PRINT CA Ps IN B
LACE
'MIMI
il-ffl 7"e
=P"
DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS
, iigi'tize( -
At a public hearing of the Board of Appeals held on June 222,—
97 1 at 0 P.M. in the Council Room, City Hall, Northampton,
i
assachusetts on the petiti on of HENRY & ROSE KUBOSIAK 41 DAMON
CAD NORTHAMPTON MASSACHUSETTS fora ipermit Mger the provisions
f Section 11 paragra 1 4 of Chapter 44 of Cit Ordinances
f the City of Northampton, for the RMose o HAVING A STORAGE
UILDING FOR MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT USED IN THEIR WRECKING COMPAN
USINESS. SITUATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLES MEADOW ROAD IN SAID
ORTHAMPTON.
he Boa= voted that the 32etitioners are autho ized by ermit to
se the - proposedlocation for a storage yara for one ear subjec
o the following- conditions:
(1) That only 1 -1/2 acres including the site of
the propsed building shall be used for this
purpose.
(2) The building to be constructed on the locati
shall be four sided.
(3) All salvage materials shall be stored within
the building.
(4) No gunk or vehicles not used in connection
with the petitioners' wrecking company
business shall be stored on the location.
(5) The location shall be enclosed by a fence at
least six feet high, and the fence shall be
constructed of materials which will screen
the area from view.
BOA OF APPEALS
in
a4f� of Nart4amptan Aassar4usdts
BOARD OF APPEALS �_� /c 41/
Room 15 'ligitiZel ,.,
City Hall ' 10, Kea
Notice: —This petition must be filled out in ink or typewritten, filed in triplicate and accompanied by 3 sets of
plans of the affected premises showing location, dimensions and area of the lot, and the locations, dimen-
sions and the distance from the boundary lines of all structures erected and to be erected. It shall be
filed at the office of the Board of Appeals and shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $25.00
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
Petitioner(s) JENRY & R �1
_ ........................................... ..................._. Address .............................._......... .......... +........................................... ...............................
The petitioner is the owner, lessee, tenant in possession, has a written contract to purchase or lease the premises affected by
this petition. '(Cross out inapplicable words, not applicable to petitions for review).
Petiton is hereby made fora
{ �aaFs p r ovisi o ns Ut >t
Section ........_ .................. paragraph(A.).....4............... of C. 44 of the City Ordinances of the City of Northampton.
The Premises affected are situate on the North .................. South .................. East .................. West.......,........ side of OOIRS.,,.. 2A.dQlAt... Rd,
a ll2 MOMS No. Xing
or less /
Street;....... a . ..........:.................... feet distan rom the corner of _..�i'r , ! ..... a 1�"�+►.... ......� /............ Street
**W&x Sea MOra Pssticalarr dascaiptioa below.
Description of Proposed Building
j q g gM
1. Size of building ............................ .*................. ............................... front ................................................... ............................... fe deep.
.................
•
Height................. ............................... stories:......... . 1 ...... ............................... feet.
2. Occupancy or use: of each floor fOr alt.
3. Zone District ............. A.. ............................... 4. Date of erection (only if already existing)
5. Has there been a previous petition concerning the affected premises? I"#..... ..,wt. -two i with petnission
Of board wLthout gr* jWic.,
6. Description of proposed work and use:
. stos' �! . c ld . for .. material and 1p�rrstt . .in v�142 saw"suY
- .............. ...............................
basilaess.
7. ft* rsaaoas ... V.44h ..- Z....bess a ....P!t #t ea .are► as fo21ow1:
................................................................... ...............................
U
tsMs*. we Pasm
............. b
ftet
0
tab" by
rvr�aty (TG) sores of Law on Ries jba&w Vii.
slur ax" JLn"JL " is about ei+gbt bmft" soma"
1MA" A M
a SMOVased &eras road, : _ f *rstesly of _ CI)l
a Meadow lbpai,
.. ..za� __ . _. __ _ _ _
&-y l"umTe oT owner or agent
1
I (we) hereby certify that the persons named below are all the owners of the property adjoining the premises affected, and
are all the owners of all the property within a distance of 200 feet of any boundary of the emises 4ffe9ted as they appear on
the most recent tax list. 7,r�er
C
....... . .... _ ...................... ..... .............. ................. ....
Signature of owner or agent
Names: !i!!!Y ._ .. �t f" . � . .......................... ........... Addresses: '41 '�� Re", � tome mass,
........................................................... ..... .................................................................................................. ...............................
i..
_,. 9�i111x
PUBLIC NOTICE Jivizet
Keo
The Northampton Board of Appeals will hold a public hearing on the
petition of HENRY & ROSE KUBOSIAK,
41
DAMON ROAD,
NORTHAMPTON,
MASSACHUSETTS, for a permit under
the
provisions
of Section 11
paragraph W 4 of Chapter 44 of the City Ordinances of the City of
Northampton, for the purpose of HAVING A STORAGE BUILDING FOR MATERIAL
AND EQUIPMENT USED IN THEIR WRECKING COMPANY BUSINESS.
THE PREMISES AFFECTED ARE SITUATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLES MEAD
ROAD 2,112 FEET MORE OR LESS DISTANT FROM THE CORNER OF COLES MEADOW RO
AND NORTH KING STREET IN SAID NORTHAMPTON.
THE HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 22, 1971 at 7:30 P.M. IN THE
CO CIL ROCK, CI1f HALL_ WOR'1't1APQ2"lO1V. MASSACHUSETTS.
BOARD OF APPEALS
Publish: June 1, 1971 & June 8, 1971
(galled' proofs)
Chairman
PLEASE PRINT CAPS IN BOLD FACE
a4f� of Nort4ampton ' fflassar4usetts
BOARD OF APPEALS ryiauiii
'iigir izew ,
Room 15 � ' KeO
City Hall
Notice: —This petition must be filled out in ink or typewritten, filed in triplicate and accompanied by 3 sets of
plans of the affected premises showing location, dimensions and area of the lot, and the locations, dimen-
sions and the distance from the boundary lines of all structures erected and to be erected. It shall be
filed at the office of the Board of Appeals and shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $25.00
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
Petitioner(s) 1 ........................ _ ........ . Address .............$146
................ ................................................................................................................. ...............................
The petitioner is the owner, lessee, tenant in possession, has a written contract to purchase or lease the premises affected by
this petition. (Cross out inapplicable words, not applicable to petitions for review).
Permit under the provisions
Petiton is hereby made for a Variation from the requirements of
I
Review of a decision of the Building Inspector under
Section ..1.1 ........................ paragraph .U......�........... of C. 44 of the City Ordinances of the City of Northampton.
'
The Premises affected are situate on the North .................. South .................. East .................. West.............. side of ... CO .t........... �! �***& �t .. ............................... ' 4 ,
Street;....." # . ' ............. feet distant from the corner of X.61*11 ....!AM4 **.. a st. ....V11,...... Street and are known as No.
........................................ ......................... ............................... Street.
Description o +wilding
1. Size of building ......................................................i f
..... ............................... front .................... ......................................................... ............................... feet deep.
++��
Height .............. ................Ak............. stories: ............... I t " .............................. feet.
2. Occupancy or use: ..... ............_. ... .. ..................._!................................................................................................. ...............................
P Y ( of each floor ) .............::. ry t.
3. Zone District .... A ............ ............................... 4. Date of erection (only if already existing)
5. Has there been a previous petition concerning the affected premises? ....................
6. Description of proposed work and use:
.......... AU 't l.... .... �". +12:r.....- AtOrl.111.....�t�..t .....I MA V. *. .1R1�!lEl....� 1 �....�"'1 � � 11� ....................................... ...............................
7. The reasons upon which I base my petition are as follows:
.
........... .................................... #rl t �i .....1, out of * 01 0* of ��1 C � �11f4
.. ............................................................................................................................................................. ...............................
............................................................................................................................_.................................................................................................... ...............................
. Alt..... ...............::...... ............................ #tom p amt. * y 2 to r!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
or thlo of*" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........ ... .. .... . .. .. ......... .....
............ _ ............................ ....._........................................... ............................... ...........................................
Date
Date ture of owner or agent
I (we) hereby certify that the persons named below are all the owners of the property adjoining the premises affected, and
are all the owners of all the property within a distance of 200 feet of any boundary of the premises affected as they appear on
the most recent tax list. J
_ ............ ............/................... ... ... ... ...................... ...... ......................... _. ............. ._....
Si ture of owner or agent
Names: .... .._ .... b e*..* J :...... .........._.................... Addresses: 1&.......i"
. �l'... * ......�� ................
Copy of Public Notice mailed to all abutters & applicant . on March 31, 1
......................................................................................................... ............................... .................................. _....
.and . to . the _following people:
...... .................................................................................................. ...............................
Charles Serino
....................... I ........................... -.. ............ . ............................... ................
Roger Slawson Esq. _.
Charles Dragon
Warren Sullivan
............................................................................................. ...............................
Exanci's P......, xyan ...................... ......_...............................................
MaY ..2 r.... Sean... DunPhY ........................................ ...............................
A PETITION
To Mr. Charles J. Serino, Chairman, Board of Appeals, City Hall, Main Street,
Northampton, Eassachusetts, be it known:
We, the undersigned, respectfully petition the Board of Appeals to take notice of our
complete and total opposition to, a petition being heard before your board at 7:30 P.AT.,
June 22, 1971, presented by Henry and Rose Kubosiak of 41 Damon Road, Northampton,
Massachusetts for a permit under the provisions of Section 11, Paragraph (i) 4 of Chapter 4 4
of the City Ordinances of the City of Northampton, for the purpose of having a storage
buil.dia-�g for material and equipment used in their wrecking company business.
We, the undersigned, are in complete and total opposition to property owned by Henry
and Rose Kubosiak of 41 Damon Road, Northampton; Massachusetts, situated on the west side
of Coles Meadm. Road, 2,112 feet more or less distant from the corner of Coles Meadow Road
and North King Street in said Northampton, Massachusetts, to be used for any purpose other
than as specifically defined by City Ordinance under Residence "A ", in its purest form, as
provided for the construction of single family homes.
We, the undersigned, are in complete and total opposition to Henry and Rose Kubosiak's
property on Coles Meadas; Road, Northampton, Massachusetts, to be used for industry, business,
storage; buildings, storage yards (for any type of material and equipment), apartment houses,
and /or garden apartment type structures.
We, the undersigned, respectfully call to the attention of the Board of Appeals, that
the Coles Mea.dosti Road. Area is, by City Ordinance, zoned Residence " A ". Bearing this fact
of law in mind, and confident that our property would be protected by the land use restrictions
defined, under Residence "A« of our City Ordinance zoning laws, we , av the undersigned, residents,
home otirners, and property owners. in the Coles Meadow Road Area, he literally staked our
lives and property on the protection guaranteed us under Residence "A" of the City of
Northampton's zoning laws. �
It is of grave concern to us, the undersigned, that and consideration should be given
to changing the presently zoned. Residential "Art status of Coles Meadow Road, in any way,
at any time, nosy or in the future.
Furthermore, at a time in history, when all of mankind has finally become aware of manes
destruction of his environment, it dictates that every effort should be made not to further
pollute our environment and upset the natural ecology of the land.
Henry and Rose Kubosiakls property on Coles Meadow Road in said Northampton, Massachusetts
plays a. vital role in the balance of nature for the whole Coles Meadow Area; including Broad
Brook, Sunning Gutter, and the Mill River Valley in Hatfield, Massachusetts. Serious
consideration shou:.ld be given to the manner in which Residence "A" zoning; ordinances should
be applied on Henry and Rose Kubosiak's property on Colas Meadow Road, Northam ')ton, Mass—
achusetts for the iunpro -ner placement of septic tank systems might contaminate and pollute
all the above mentioned streaans and rivers, proving a health hazard to people and livestock
for miles belmi the Kubosiak Property.
Again, ire, the undersigned, go on record before the Board of Appeals as being totally
opposed to the Coles Meadow.Road Area, in particular the property owned by Henry and Rose
Kubosiak on whose petition the Board of Appeals is to act upon at 7:30 P.M., June 22, 1971,
to be used In any manner other than to provide single family dwelling houses as defined
under Residence "A", in its purest form, of our City Ordinance mooning Laws.
NAME
ADDRESS
I-
wlrelltrl
.r37�. �` ni I io;'YO 2 J 7-
That the petitioners are authorised by permit to use the
proposed location for a storage yard for one year subject
to the following conditionsa
(1) That only 1 -1/1' acres including the site of the
proposed building shall be used for this purpose.
(2) The building to be constructed on the location
shall be four sided.
(3) All salvage materials shall be stored within the
building.
(4) *o Junk or vehicles not used in connevtion with
the petitioners.. wrecking coMany business shall
be stored on the location.
(5) The location shall be enclosed by a fence at least
six feet high, and the fence shall be constructed
of materials which will *croon the area from view.
ask_ -
COMMC,, OF MASSACHUSETTS
' EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ' ti
y .
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DIVISION OF FORESTS AND PARKS - REGION 1V ALMA
P.O. BOX 484, AMHERST, MA 01004 413 -545 -5993 FAX 545 -5995
William F. weld ,ii}t� tze� .- TRANSMITTAL SHEET
GOVERNOR KeG
Argeo Paul Cellucci
LT. GOVERNOR To: �DEP Regional Office,
Conservatin o Commission
SECRETAR Trudy AR __ Public Wat- , Sapply Authority
Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
Peter C. Webber Assessor's Office
COMMISSIONER
The enclosed Forest Cutting Plan_has been approved by DEM
under the authority of the Forest Cutting Practices Act (Ch.
132, s. 40 -46 M. G.L.). This copy is provided to you as
required by the regulations (3.04 CMR 11.00) and /or the
DEM /DEP Memorandum of Understanding.
If ou have an •
Y y questions or comments please contact me
at the above number.
Sincerely,
1
Service Forester,
Division of Forests and Parks
NOTE �r0 CON6 i�RVATION COMMISSIONS
The Act requires the applicant to deliver this plan to the
local conservation commission at least ten business days prior
to the start of cutting. If you did not receive the required
notice from the applicant please contact me as soon as
possible.
printed on recYc led Puper
rcarest Vuttmg roan
arid, Notice of Intent under. ss- General Laws,
Chapter 132 - the Forest Cutting Practices Act.
FiIFULP t58 IA
Date Rec'
Earliest Start: la
River Basin;
IFS
'c`�, ?6, ?' k o
Nat. Her.?
Pub. Dr. Wtr.1
ACEC? No
Location
Town Ater X/ *-rr e'll, A"
Road anQ
Acres 9a? Proposed start date 4
Vol. MBF / Vol. Cds 5 Vol. Other.
Landowner
Landowner name u -0 S/A
Mailing address �ll ��CS/'�1! a.� d•4 f�
Town, State, Zip 1 I
Phone
Chapter 61 ? Mgmt. Plan #
Est. stumpage value ?
Preparer of Plan Licensed Timber Harvester*
Person, oa :ia: hz:. landn ner ,e?r i:y glare
Firm name
Individual name Di9v /,tj .P� S? .Lt If
Mailing address
�iC! /�7fi' G��
Town, State, Zip
Phone
Firm name T g IL- ,Tir
Individuel name __ �,9yi fJ �.� GS •e.l L
Mailing eddress ar- /157 l,�,ac�d Sf
Town, State, Zip „/G 4k.A -e 4 /c
Phone .r /3 K' 392 3 1V0 License No. f 0�
• This information may be supplied after plan approval.
Stream Crossings Harvesting in Wetlands
Indicate location on map ===10-
SC -1
SC -2
SC -3
SC -4
Type of crossing-
U
i6v
/
Mitigation
Existing structure ?
Type of crossina: Stabilization:
CU Culvert SE Seed
Mijiyation:
FR Frozen
Stabilization
Type of bottom:
is
ST Stony
FO Ford CO Corduroy
OT Other
Bank height (ft.):
PO Poled ST Stone
GR Gravel
OT Other HB Hay bales
Stabilization:
D
OT Other
Wetland Crossings
Indicate location on map a
HW -1
HW -2
HW -3
Length of crossing (ft.)
Forest : (see page two)
Om
i6v
/
Mitigation
Acres to be harvested:
Type of crossina: Stabilization:
CU Culvert SE Seed
Mijiyation:
FR Frozen
Stabilization
Resid. Basal Area ( >50% ?):
is
ST Stony
FO Ford CO Corduroy
Indicate location on map —►
HW -1
HW -2
HW -3
HW-4
Forest : (see page two)
Om
i6v
/
Acres to be harvested:
Type of crossina: Stabilization:
CU Culvert SE Seed
Mijiyation:
FR Frozen
Tyne of bottom-
LE Ledge
Resid. Basal Area ( >50% ?):
is
ST Stony
FO Ford CO Corduroy
OT Other
e s
Other Sys �.
„El' P�
Filter Strips
Indicate location on map
FS -1
FS -2
FS
FS -4
Width(50', 100' or VAriable)
54
i6v
/
•Refer to regulations for information regarding variable filter strips.
Type of crossina: Stabilization:
CU Culvert SE Seed
Mijiyation:
FR Frozen
Tyne of bottom-
LE Ledge
BR Bridge MU Mulch
DR Dry
ST Stony
FO Ford CO Corduroy
OT Other
MU Mud
PO Poled ST Stone
GR Gravel
OT Other HB Hay bales
OT Other
Note:
Applicant must provide DEM with all relevant information
before plan may be approved and cutting may begin.,
Some forestry activities, such as prescribed burning and
pesticide or fertTaer application may require additional
permits. Consult A94 Forestry BMP Manual for further
information.
Attach a Narrative Page if further explanation is needed or "other" is used for any category.
Page 27
Stand treatment
(See codes at bottom of page) `'
Indicate location on map ST -1 .ST - ST - ST
Forest T e ui dr►
Acres 2S ,t
cut
OR
Type of intermediate cut
'If not by marking. describe spp.. size. quality and b.a. to be art below.
Lv I?/ f1 /y' �gryi <1�Y
Ze fijiy
L - --r+�
�C7AS�� ftrtA wr / /� �yf !ti G3 f'/
Landowner
I (we) hereby certify that I (we) have the legal authority
to carry out the afore - described operation. Failure to
accurately update the material herein required and .
provide other relevant information can result in the
voiding of this plan.
I (We) also certify that I (we) have notified the
Conservation Commission in the municipality in which
the operation is to take place and the abutters of record
within two - hundred feet of the area to be harvested.
A Signaturets) of landowner(s) or agent D to
Products tr he harvested
TOTAL MBF 1 14j<
Spades; Record sawtimber volumes by species. CDs
U d4 : MBF - 1,000s of Board Feet, CDs - Cords,
TON - Tons, CCF, - t 00s of Cubic Feet. TON
Vekane; Record to the nrarllot who'e unit IMBF, etc.) _CCF
Appointment of agent
As owner of the property to be harvested I hereby designate
the following person to act as my agent for the purpose of
conducting the harvest covered by this Forest Cutting Plan
km*K V executing all forms and documents required by law. I
understand, however, that the statutes, including criminal
fines, continue to apply to me as the owner of record.
Agent's Name
AAaikv Address
Town, State, Zip ula LA Phone
i(ea
Sgiatwe(s) of landowner(s)
Page 28
Forest Cutting Plan
Approv Disapproved Expires p
C g I n L
ignsture of Service Forester /Di or - s Agent Date:
Approved Disapproved Expires Serv. For. Inits.
Extension 13
Amendment ❑ ❑
Eores- t LME
WP . White Pine
WK WP /Hem
WH WP/Hdwd
WO WP /Oak
RP Red Pine
SR Red Spruce
PP Pitch Pine
PO PP /Oak
HK
Hemlock
OM Mixed Oak
Species Units
Vol. Species
Units Vol.
White Pine
S'OQd Red Maple
Tamarack
Red Pine
Sugar Maple
ddd
Pitch Pine
Red Oak
Bea/Bir /Maple
Hemlock
4U� Black Osk
SM
Spruce
White Oak
�
Other Softwood
Other Oak
SF
White Ash
Other Hdwd.
Beech
Beech
Hdwd Fuelwd
White Birch
Softwood Pulp
8 iii Y Birch
Chips
Blade Cherry
TOTAL MBF 1 14j<
Spades; Record sawtimber volumes by species. CDs
U d4 : MBF - 1,000s of Board Feet, CDs - Cords,
TON - Tons, CCF, - t 00s of Cubic Feet. TON
Vekane; Record to the nrarllot who'e unit IMBF, etc.) _CCF
Appointment of agent
As owner of the property to be harvested I hereby designate
the following person to act as my agent for the purpose of
conducting the harvest covered by this Forest Cutting Plan
km*K V executing all forms and documents required by law. I
understand, however, that the statutes, including criminal
fines, continue to apply to me as the owner of record.
Agent's Name
AAaikv Address
Town, State, Zip ula LA Phone
i(ea
Sgiatwe(s) of landowner(s)
Page 28
Forest Cutting Plan
Approv Disapproved Expires p
C g I n L
ignsture of Service Forester /Di or - s Agent Date:
Approved Disapproved Expires Serv. For. Inits.
Extension 13
Amendment ❑ ❑
Eores- t LME
WP . White Pine
WK WP /Hem
WH WP/Hdwd
WO WP /Oak
RP Red Pine
SR Red Spruce
PP Pitch Pine
PO PP /Oak
HK
Hemlock
OM Mixed Oak
HH
Hem /Hdwd
RM
Red Maple
TK
Tamarack
BC
Blk Cherry
CD
Cedar
BB
Bea/Bir /Maple
OH
Oak /Hdwd.
SM
Sugar Maple
BW
White Birch
BM
IOT
Br/Red Maple
SF
Spruce /Fr
BE
Beech
OR
N Red Oak
Other
Date
Final Report
I hereby certify. that the afore - described Forest Cutting Plan
and vill neftvare* I . !P bOa. aubatantially ccrrtnlied with.
SiDneDNe of Service FOreatef /Director's Agent Date
Service Forester's Comments:
CT Cut Tn"
LT Leave trans
SB Stand Bdoy
OT Other
Primary Obie�+.
WP W Wood Production
IN Short term irteome
WH Wildlife Habitat
AR Aesthetics b Rec
SW Soil b Water Mgmt
OT - Other
Souree
AD
of R a n ration
Advance
Tvoe
SE
of Reoeneretion .t•
Selection
SH
Shelterwood
ST
Seed Tree
CC
Clearcut
SA
Salvage
CO
Coppice
CS.
Copp./Stsndsrds
OT
Other
Souree
AD
of R a n ration
Advance
SE
Natural Seed
DS
Direct Seed
PL
Plant -
CCO
Othe
Type
TH
of Intermndiat �' n•
Thinning
RE
Release
IM
Improvement
SA
Salvage
OT Other
T
�' n r -TI
O
>
- 7
co
00
.
I
rb
Cw
5
00
.
I
r
�.
A I rg
IBS 13 '75
5. 12! os e---
w�
�p7
w c�
Z
Y
9
I
-7
n
tr °
i
16-
P
eb
A
'—
�•
o
in
E
0
no
L
0,
e
�
`^
z
a
o
�
5. 12! os e---
w�
�p7
Y
9
I
-7
i
16-
rb
A
'—
�•
o
in
0
no
L
N
i
16-
M oir►
FORM A
NORTHAMPTON, MA
APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT
OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQL'; ^c APPROVAL
d �
File five completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City Clerk and the
Planning Board in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.02.
To the Planning Board:
The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his /her property
in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the meaning of the
Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and
endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not
required.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Applicant Barbara Barker 4adn f fit/
Print or type name Signature
247 Coles Meadow Road, Northampton 584 -1010
Address Phone
Owner Henry P. Kubosiak =
Print or type name Sig at
262 Coles Meadow Road, Northampton'
Address Phone
Surveyor Harold T. Eaton & Assoc. Tnc_ !;� Z�
Print or type name Signature
235 Russell Street. Hadley MA 01035 584 -7599
Address Phone
Deed or property recorded in Hampshire Registry,
Book 1585 Page 67
Location and Description of Property:
Land on West Side of Coles Meadow Road.
Assessor's Map ID: 8 Lot(s):
Date Submitted for Planning
Board Approval:
City Clerk:
(Signature)
(8/13/91)
54
Date Plan ' B and
Decision it
Ca
City Cle k
(S i +ue
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - - - - -- -PAGE 60
M
0)
t0
Lti
Q
w
co
Y
0
m
Z
OL
Z
0
Ld
0
U
cr-
Z
Q
J
CL
LL-
0
Z
Q
_0
w
W
0
•
O tp- y�2
tp
dip
Ilk 7
0 �'� k 70-- 0 ov,
s
.,wl�
- LEGEND-
FOUND IRON PIN
IRON PIN TO BE SET
1 REPORT THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY
WITH THE 19 76 RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERS OF
DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
DATE: I t—to- OM
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
tH OF Mq
c�.
E
a� a
#35032
10 , S StO�r
�
FEET
U �
to i
APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION
CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED
NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS
j3 h�yy
OVA
+
s=
DATE: NOV 171992
0 4 -
PLAN OF LAND IN
NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS
PREPARED FOR
EDWARD W. AND SHIRLEY M. KUBOSIAK
SCALE: 1` = 20' NOVEMBER 6, 1982
HAROLD L EATON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
235 RUSSELL STREET — HADLEY — MASSACHUSETTS
20 0 20 40 60 80
m
c
r�
OFD - 0.5y A
� z
4
AL:
O �S - OS L � 6
. /
!
f
}
� � !
�
/ f
. !
�
{
41