Village Hill 1997 Northampton State Hospital Environmental Notification Form ENFm
ca
C
~ I
Environmental Notification Form
~ i
41
0
Northampton. state Hospital
0
L Northampton, Massachusetts
0
0
08
L February 18, 1997
CD
s
v
a~
Submitted To:
MEPA Unit
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street - 20th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02202
r-
0
t Submitted By:
0
CL
N
i Commonwealth of Massachusetts
by its
Division of Capital Planning and Operations
a~
E
Prepared By:
U
N
T
E A R T H E C H
°
a~
7
C
N
IJ
o
February 18, 1997
WILLIAM F. WELD
r
GOVERNOR
ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
CHARLES D. BAKER
SECRETARY
LARK JUREV PALERMO
COMMISSIONER
1
Secretary Trudy Coxe
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202
Attn: MEPA Unit
~iLGeGJ,/iI t. (01P,e At, e Yll./,J/JYI.t//9161416(16(wl and - XVwlnlce
One. I'ZLA1116411 t, y1 e
5od,l n, ~l~a u~~u~eLl 02408
Tel: (617) 727-4050
Fax: (617) 727-5363
Re: Approximately 226 acres of land formerly known as the
Northampton State Hospital campus, Northampton, Massachusetts
Dear Secretary Coxe:
This project consists of the disposition and redevelopment of approximately 226
acres of land and buildings formerly known as the Northampton State Hospital campus in
Northampton (the "Site"). Pursuant to Chapters 86 and 307 of the Legislative Acts of
1994 (the "Legislation"), the Division of Capital Planning and Operations ("DCPO") of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is directed, and in limited instances authorized, to
convey a total of approximately 70 acres of the Site (the "Public Conveyance Parcels") to
the City of Northampton (the "City"), the Northampton Housing Authority ("NHA") and
the Department of Food and Agriculture ("DFA") and to grant certain easements to
Smith College for uses specified in the Legislation. The Public Conveyance Parcels are
to be used for agricultural, recreational, conservation, affordable housing and municipal
purposes (collectively referred to herein as the "Public Conveyance/Project"). The
Legislation also directs DCPO to convey the remaining 154 acres of land and
approximately 880,000 square feet of building space of the Site (the "Private
Development Parcels") to a private developer or developers (the "Private Development
Conveyance/Project"). The disposition and redevelopment of the Private Development
Parcels will be accomplished through the issuance of a Request for Proposals ("UP")
which has been endorsed by the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Site.
it
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 2
The Public Conveyance/Project and the Private Development Conveyance/Project
are subject to the use and development restrictions set forth in the Legislation; the
_ Memorandum of Agreement between the City and DCPO (the "City MOA"); the City's
_l zoning regulations for the Site, which were adopted following a full public re-zoning
process; the City's Planning Board's Northampton State Hospital Plan for the Site (the
"Site Plan") which also was adopted following a full public process, as described in
Section IV of the Environmental Notification Form ("ENF" the recommendations of the
Citizen's Advisory Committee (the "CAC"), different compositions of which worked and
held public meetings for over 15 years on the reuse of the Site, as described in Section IV
of the ENF; and certain historic preservation guidelines pursuant to a Memorandum of
Agreement (the "MHC MOA") between the City, DCPO and the Massachusetts
Commission (collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Guidelines"), all as discussed
~l further below. A complete listing of the conveyances, the transfer recipients and the
expected land uses is provided in Table 1 to the attached ENF. The Legislation, which
directs uses of the Site and the recipients thereof, embodies the collective wisdom of
these public processes in which the CAC, the Mayor, the Conservation Commission, the
Recreation Commission, the Office of Planning and Development, the Planning Board_
D and many other agencies and community members participated since the early 1980's:.
Pursuant to 301 CMR 11. 18, for the reasons and subject to the conditions
specified below, the proponent hereby requests the following waivers of the requirement
to prepare an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"):
(i) With respect to the Public Conveyance Parcels, the proponent requests a full
waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR and authorization for the
immediate disposition, remediation and renovation of the parcels; and
(ii) With respect to the Private Development Parcels, the proponent requests a
waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR for the conveyance of certain
parcels at the Site to private developer(s), subject to the imposition of a
contractual obligation in the Land Disposition Agreements that the
developer(s) fully comply with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act
("MEPA") process prior to undertaking any construction work on the Site.
Background
A. Public Conveyance Parcels. Under the terms of the Legislation, which is
I~ the culmination of approximately 15 years of public process to determine
appropriate uses of the Site, DCPO will convey certain parcels and easements
on the Site totaling approximately 70 acres to the City, NHA, DFA and Smith
College. The Legislation directs that these parcels be used for a variety of
beneficial uses, including open space preservation, recreation/conservation,
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 3
l
community gardens, agriculture, municipal uses (e.g., school, public safety
I)
facility, or athletic field), affordable housing and housing for Department of
Mental Health ("DMH") clients. A 100 foot conservation restriction and
n
public right-of-way easement running parallel to the Mill River will be granted
I__1
to the City for public use of foot trails for fishing, hiking, winter sports and
nature study. DFA will receive an Agricultural Preservation Restriction on
approximately 36 acres of the Site (Parcel D) to ensure that its agricultural use
is preserved. In addition, Smith College will be granted an easement for access
roads and other utilities serving its athletic fields. As stated above, a complete
C
listing of these conveyances; the transfer recipients and the expected land uses
J
is provided in Table 1 to the attached ENF. The Public Conveyance/Project
will not pose significant environmental impacts, as the current uses of these
parcels will be maintained; and although the Legislation permits the use of
Parcel C for a range of municipal uses, the City's current and foreseeable plan
is to use Parcel C for recreational purposes. The Public Conveyance/Project
L,
will provide immediate, significant benefits to the City, the Commonwealth
and the environment, without significant negative impacts, and, thus, should.be
D
undertaken as soon as possible.
B. Private Development Parcels. With respect to the Private Development
Parcels, DCPO will issue a RFP for their disposition, reuse and redevelopment.
u
LJ
The RFP will specify that the reuse of the Site is subject to the Guidelines,
which set forth specific objectives for the redevelopment of the Site, including
(i) preservation of open spaces and agricultural land, including conservation
U
1
restrictions; (ii) preservation of the historic buildings and landscapes in
accordance with the MHC MOA; (iii) job creation and economic growth; and
(iv) the development of affordable housing and housing for DMH clients.
These Guidelines are the result of numerous studies and public review
r }
u
hearings, discussed further below.
C. Guidelines for the Site. The entire project has been subject to numerous
and extensive public review processes which have spanned over 15 years.
Interested parties have had notice and multiple opportunities to comment on
the project and its impacts. These include:
• In 1980 the City authorized the preparation of a reuse study of the Site.
• In 1982 a final reuse study of the site was accepted by the City.
• In 1984, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst Center for
Economic Development prepared a study for the reuse and
redevelopment of the Site.
• In 1986 a Citizen's Advisory Committee was created to study the reuse
and redevelopment of the Site. The CAC is made up of members of the
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 4
li
City's Chamber of Commerce, Development Corporation, City Council
Industrial Committee, Housing Partnership, and representatives from
the Alliance for the Mentally Ill, and DMH, among others. All CAC
ll meetings are open to the public. Shortly after the passage of the
I Legislation, the CAC commenced an extensive review of the proposed
uses for the Site and adopted Development Guidelines for the project.
All of the CAC meetings are open to the public. In addition, the
' Legislation requires prior review by the CAC before commencing
development.
In 1992 the City adopted the Northampton State Hospital Plan (the
"Site Plan"), which is the result of a lengthy review by the City's
Planning Board and community input, as further described in Section
IV of the ENF.
In 1993 the Planning Board proposed rezoning of the Site, which was
ultimately adopted, after public comment and review. The zoning for
the Site, as described in the ENF, is the result of a two year study
process during which the Northampton Office of Planning and
Development and the Planning Board sponsored numerous public
hearings and forums and collected input from the Mayor, City
Councilors, City boards, the CAC, and from numerous City residents.
The Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Recreation
Commission, Partnership for Economic Development, and Greater
Northampton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors all voted
unanimously to endorse the zoning.
• In 1994 and early 1995 the Governor signed legislation authorizing and
directing the dispositions described in the ENF. The Legislation
incorporates the results and recommendations developed with extensive
public participation by the Mayor, the Conservation Commission, the
Recreation Commission, the City Council, State Representatives, the
CAC, the Northampton Office of Planning and Development and the
Planning Board, among others.
• In 1995 DCPO signed a Memorandum of Agreement with
Massachusetts Historical Commission and the City memorializing their
agreement regarding the effort to preserve the historic structures on the
Site.
• In 1995 DCPO also signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the City
in which the City and DCPO agree to use their best efforts to
implement the directives of the CAC guidelines and the Site Plan.
• In 1996 the CAC approved the final draft of the Request for Proposals
regarding the reuse and redevelopment of the Private Development
Parcels.
r~
f
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 5
All of these conditions are the result of a balancing of the positive impacts and
insignificant other impacts of the project, which have been discussed in detail throughout
the public review process.
The project provides a unique and important opportunity for redevelopment of the
Site to advance the Commonwealth's and the community's goals of economic
revitalization while preserving areas of open space and, where feasible, historic buildings
and landscapes. In addition, the project will advance the Commonwealth's goals of
providing affordable housing and housing for the clients of DMH.
Waiver Request
The standards pursuant to which the Secretary may grant a waiver are set forth in
301 CMR 11.18. The Secretary may waive any provision of the MEPA Regulations if
she determines that strict compliance with the provision or requirements would result in
undue hardship and would not serve to minimize or avoid damage to the environment. In
addition, for projects that are categorically included, pursuant to 301 CMR 11.25, a
waiver of the categorical inclusion regulations may be granted based upon one or more:
circumstances listed in 301 CMR 11.18 (2), which are :
FJ
(i) the impacts of the project are insignificant;
(ii) aspects of the project which cause it to be categorically included are
not within the subject matter jurisdiction of MEPA;
(iii) ample and unconstrained infrastructure exists to support the project;
and
(iv) the terms agreed to as a condition to the waiver will bring about
environmental benefits in excess of those that could be achieved in
the absence of the waiver.
Where a proponent seeks to proceed with the first phase of a project pending preparation
of an EIR, the Secretary may also determine that strict compliance with the MEPA
Regulations may be waived, based upon additional considerations listed in 301 CMR
11.18 (3), including:
(i) the project is severable, and the first phase does not require the
implementation of future phases or restrict the ways in which impacts
of future phases may be mitigated;
(ii) the impacts of the first phase, taken alone, are insignificant;
(iii) the proponent commits to a schedule for completion of an EIR for
future phases, also addressing impacts of the first phase; and
(iv) the project is conditioned, by permit restriction or other evidence
satisfactory to the Secretary, such that MEPA compliance is assured
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 6
before later phases are commenced.
The conveyance and development of the Public Conveyance Parcels would not be
l categorically required to complete an EIR under 310 CMR 11.25, nor would it trigger any
- ENF MEPA thresholds except for 301 CMR 11.27(5)(a)1 (disposition by a state agency
of more than 25 contiguous acres). While the Public Conveyance Parcels contain
buildings listed on the State Register of Historic Places (301 CMR 11.25(20)), DCPO
I-~ understands from the Northampton Housing Authority that it does not currently plan to
demolish any of these buildings. However, in the event the condition of any of the
L J buildings on the Public Conveyance Parcels are determined to be in such disrepair that a
t building must be demolished, the Site is subject to the MHC MOA, which specifically
sets forth the concerns of the MHC and the procedures recommended or required by the
MHC prior to the redevelopment of the Site or demolition of contributing buildings.
Hence, as MHC has made its specific requirements regarding any demolition of buildings
F contributing to the historic character of the Site (MHC MOA Section V), no benefit is to
be gained by requiring further review through the MEPA process in the event any of the
buildings must be demolished. The MHC MOA also provides that MHC has had a
"reasonable opportunity to comment on the reuse of Northampton State Hospital."
l__1
The conveyance of the Private Development Conveyance Parcels alone would not
u be categorically required to complete an EIR nor would it trigger any MEPA thresholds
u except for 301 CMR 11.27(5)(a)l and 4, (relating to the transfer of State lands).
} A. Public Conveyance/Project Waiver Request. The Public
l_I Conveyance/Project meets the requirements for granting a waiver for the following
reasons:
(i) Requiring the preparation of an EIR would unnecessarily delay the
realization of environmental improvements, municipal uses and affordable
housing and housing for DMH clients. The proposed uses for these
conveyances, with their potential for long-term environmental, public and
economic benefits for Northampton, will be unnecessarily delayed without the
!J waiver, causing undue hardship to the City, NHA, DFA and Smith College.
Delays in the Public Conveyance/Project could jeopardize commitments of
j 1 resources for the proposed uses, as scarce resources could be reallocated to
~J other public needs if they are not applied promptly to this important project.
(ii) No environmental benefit is to be gained by requiring an EIR. The entire
project has been subject to numerous public review processes, as described
above, giving interested parties notice and numerous opportunities to
comment on the project. The Public Conveyance Parcels are currently used
for agriculture, recreation, public gardens, parks and low-density housing. All
-1
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 7
of the uses will remain the same after the conveyance, as specifically
designated by the Legislation. Many of these uses are overwhelmingly
beneficial to the environment including open space, recreation and agricultural
uses. With respect to the single family residences, NHA is currently using one
for single family housing and one for sheltering the homeless. The other
residences being conveyed to NHA were previously used by DMH for staff
residences and DCPO understands that NHA intends to renovate these homes
for affordable housing, housing for DMH clients and shelter for the homeless.
As explained above, while the Public Conveyance/Project does not trigger any of the
categorical inclusion thresholds, additional circumstances that the Secretary might
consider in her review of this project include:
(i) The Public Conveyance/Project will provide net environmental benefits to
the environment and any impacts are insignificant. The proposed conveyances
to the DFA and much of the conveyance to the City will enhance the
environment, as the agricultural, recreational, conservation and park uses are
U
the types of uses that often comprise mitigation measures. The creation of a.
walking path along the Mill River will also make the property more accessible
to the community for open space and recreational uses.
IL
(ii) Because the uses for the Public Conveyance/Project will remain the same
after the conveyance and are low-density, noncommercial uses, the Public
Conveyance/Project does not create significant impacts on the existing
infrastructure. The only proposed redevelopment for the Public
F
L~
Conveyance/Project involves the renovation of the existing 5 single family
houses for affordable housing and homeless shelter. (The Legislation permits
the use of Parcel C for a range of municipal uses, but the City's current and
t-
foreseeable plan is to use Parcel C for recreational purposes.)
(iii) Allowing the Public Conveyance/Project to proceed without further
MEPA review does not preclude the Secretary from reviewing the impacts and
proposing mitigation for the Private Development Conveyance/Project, as
further discussed below.
Li B. Private Development Conveyance/Project Waiver Request. With
respect to the Private Development Conveyance/Project, the proponent seeks to proceed
'j with the first phase of the project (i.e., conveyance subject to a contractual obligation to
J fully complete the MEPA process prior to on-site construction) pending preparation of an
EIR for the following reasons:
(i) There would be no environmental impact from the conveyance of the
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 8
Private Development Parcels. Full environmental review will be required
before any construction is undertaken on these Parcels and there will be an
early and ample opportunity to formulate mitigation measures and adjust
development plans.
(ii) The disposition of the Private Development Parcels is severable from the
development phases of the project and will not restrict the manner in which the
impacts of the project can be mitigated. DCPO will include in its Land
Disposition Agreements ("LDA") a requirement that no construction work may
occur on the portion of the Site subject to the Private LDA's until full
environmental review under the MEPA process has been completed so that any
open issues will be resolved by the private developer(s). Any open issues will
be resolved during the preparation of the Draft and Final EIRs for the
development phases of the Private Development. In addition, it will be
stipulated that any demolition or remediation shall be subject to all applicable
requirements for asbestos, lead paint and hazardous materials removal.
(iii) Requiring the preparation of an EIR for the conveyance phase of the
Private Development Conveyance/Project would unnecessarily delay the
realization of the objectives of the Legislation, including prompt disposition of
the property.
Conclusion
j In summary, with respect to the Public Conveyance/Project, requiring the
preparation of an EIR would delay the realization of environmental, open space and
~ housing improvements, and could jeopardize commitments of resources for the proposed
uses, causing undue hardship to the City, NHA, DFA and Smith College. No
environmental benefit is to be gained by requiring an EIR for the Public Conveyance
j Parcels, as the entire project has been subject to numerous public review processes and
L} the current uses of the Public Conveyance Parcels, which include agriculture, recreation,
_ public gardens, parks and low-density housing (uses that are overwhelmingly beneficial
to the environment), will remain the same after the conveyance, as specifically designated
{ by the Legislation, and will have insignificant negative impacts on the Site. With respect
to the Private Development Conveyance/Project, preparing an EIR for the conveyance
phase will unnecessarily delay the initial conveyance phase of the project and would not
serve to minimize or avoid damage to the environment. Further, there will be a
contractual obligation imposed on the private developers under the LDA, to complete the
full MEPA review process prior to undertaking construction work on the Site and any
open issues will be resolved during the preparation of the Draft and Final EIRs for the
development phases by the private developer(s).
Based upon the significant environmental and economic benefits of this project,
Secretary Trudy Coxe
February 18, 1997
Page 9
I
IIr~l
L_1
C1
;J
J
the conveyances required should be undertaken as soon as possible. Therefore, DCPO
respectfully requests (i) a waiver of the requirement of preparation of an EIR in
connection with the conveyance, remediation, renovation and reuse of a portion of the
Site to the City, NHA, DFA and Smith College (the Public Conveyance/Project); and (ii)
a waiver of the requirement of preparation of an EIR in connection with the first,
conveyancing phase of the remainder of the Site to a private developer(s) selected
through the RFP process (the Private Development Conveyance/Project).
Respectfully submitted,
On behalf of the Division of
Capital Planning and Operations,
Jamie Lewis Keith
Assistant Commissioner
and General Counsel
cc: ENF Distribution List (attached)
i
III
f--
1 ~
1 '
MErHCaeT
CHURCH
/
~l
~F--DCSY4Z
vi st
T
Rti%
ROUTE i D
M~uaHT HZGI-
Ing Girt
RHODE
COMECIMUT ISLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
CITY OF
NORTHAMPTON
LEGEND
0 PARCa DESICN1noN
sums
COIIELE AN1HAME FOR DISPOSMON
/I NOT AVAILABLE FCR DISPOSMON
C3
AVAIUBLE PARCELS 42
Parcel A 19 Acres
61 Acres
Parcel N I9 Acres
Parcel 8 24 Acres
Parcel 83 10,500 Sq. Ft.
} Parcel 84 13,000 Sq. Ft.
Parcel 85 39,000 Sq. Ft.
5 e~ Parcel E 39.Acres
~E5 'z Parcel K1 10 Acres
Parcel K7 1.6 Acres
PRO
srAl[ ' ,TO°'
300 0 ,T00 e00
DISPOSITION MAP
of State Lands at the Former
NORTHAMPTON STATE HOSPITAL
Northampton. Massachusetts
Apr% 1996
- CCMNKMMfALRr OF n
DM119gV Q'' CAPITAL PIANNAC ArM7 a1V% 0W LARK ,AWY PALERMO, CCA#ASpp&R
MAPPAP61 ROBOW ASST T-M - RWVF M, AW NRPRW - &W&naD. WSS10V/SETTS
'l-,- ,
Canuuem
aurow
~s 9~~ R~NC
Northampton Housing
Authority
City of Northampton
® Private Development
Department of Food
and Agriculture
q
Mary L. Ford
Mayor
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
MASSACHUSETTS
CITY HALL
210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060
OFFICE OF THE MA YOR
(413) 586-6950
FAX: (413) 586-3726
April 1, 1997
Secretary Trudy Coxe
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Attention: MEPA Unit
100 Cambridge Street, 20"' Floor
Boston, MA 02202
EOEA 11047 Northampton State Hospital Disposition/Redevelopment (DCPO)
Dear Secretary Coxe:
I would like to support the Northampton State Hospital ENF, a full waiver of an EIR for the
Public Conveyances and a Phase 1 waiver of an EIR for the Private Development Conveyances.
I would like to request, however, that you issue a Scope of Work and time schedule for the EIR
for the Private Development Conveyances.
The ENF describes a redevelopment process consistent with Northampton's planning and
consensus building efforts. We are confident that the legislation, DCPO's Request for Proposals,
our planning, our zoning, and our Memorandum of Agreement with DCPO and the
Massachusetts Historical Commission will create sustainable redevelopment that meets our
community's goals and objectives.
We agree that you should grant a full waiver of the requirement for an EIR for the Public
Conveyances. As directed by Chapters 86 and 307 of the Legislative Acts of 1994, DCPO will
transfer several parcels to the City of Northampton, the Northampton Housing Authority and the
Department of Food and Agriculture. The environmental impacts of the transfers and the uses
allowed by legislation are negligible and clearly positive.
We support a Phase 1 waiver of the requirement for an EIR for the Private Development
Conveyances if MEPA issues a Scope of Work and a time schedule for the EIR at this time. A
Phase 1 waiver is appropriate because all the impacts of the redevelopment of the Private
Development cannot be evaluated until a campus developer has been selected and a
redevelopment scheme adopted. We believe, however, that developing a Scope of Work and
time schedule at this time is critical so DCPO can immediately begin preparing the necessary
background studies.
0.ZtUHpT
2,0 +n oy
9 ' N
# ck d
N`,dEy
The Scope of Work should reflect that our zoning, the legislation, and the MHC/DCPO/City
Memorandum of Agreement ensure that any development at the Northampton State Hospital will have minimal impacts on the human and built environment. Our zoning has strict performance
standards that ensure that development is in keeping with the character of Northampton's built
environment, preserves historical buildings to the extend possible, minimizes traffic impacts, and
limit all types of emissions. DCPO has already commissioned a detailed traffic study and
DCPO's consultants are working on the redesign of one difficult intersection. As required by the
legislation, DCPO has commissioned a preliminary site evaluation adequate to determine the
magnitude and the cost of cleaning up all hazardous materials from the campus. As required by
the joint Memorandum of Agreement, DCPO is preparing to photo record all historical buildings
on campus.
We believe that you should encourage DCPO to identify and begin any further studies which are
needed for the Private Development EIR. We therefore request that your Record of Decision
will include a Scope of Work for the EIR. We have the following comments on the Scope:
Build-out Assumption: The Northampton Citizen's Advisory Committee established a
goal of the number of jobs and housing units that should eventually be developed on the
campus. Although this goal is higher than market conditions will currently support, the
goal should be used in determining build-out. This goal is consistent with all the
planning that the City has done.
2. Traffic Analysis: DCPO has completed a draft traffic study showing the effects of build-
out (as defined in paragraph 1 above) on area roads. The EIR should consider ways to
mitigate or minimize these impacts.
3.. Municipal Fiscal Impacts: If it is within the scope of your authority, we believe any
development of this magnitude should include an analysis of municipal fiscal impacts.
The base line for this analysis is a tax-exempt property which requires almost no
municipal services.
4. Environmental Impacts: Any required environmental analysis should be based on the
understanding that this is a redevelopment project, not a new "greenfield" development.
The legislation ensures that most of the open space at the campus remains open and that,
except for one 24-acre suburban housing area, redevelopment be limited to areas there
were historically developed. Any analysis of runoff, traffic, noise and other impacts
should be comparing new development to historical development, not to pristine
conditions.
Sincerely,
Mayor Mary L. Ford
a
The Convnonwealth of Massachusetts .
March 18, 1997 William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth
Massachusetts Historical Commission
-Secretary Trudy Coxe
Executive. Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02202 C11AR 2 0 !997
ATTN: MEPA Unit - -
RE: Northampton State Hospital Site Disposition/Redevelopment, Northampton,-MA;.EQ- No. 11047
Dear Secretary Coxe:
Staff of the Massachusetts Historical Commission have reviewed the Environmental Notification Form
you submitted, received February 20, 1997, regarding the proposed project referenced above. The
Northampton State Hospital is listed in the State and National Registers of Historic Places.
MHC staff understand that the proposed project involves the conveyance of t the former State Hospital site,
in parcels, to the City of Northampton, the Northampton Housing Authority, Massachusetts
Department of Agriculture, and Smith College, and the conveyance of approximately 154 acres to a
private developer(s) through the public bidding process. The MHC, DCPO, and the City of Northampton
have consulted extensively regarding the proposed surplussing and redevelopment of the former hospital
site and have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The MOA, a copy of which is included
as an appendix to the ENF, outlines stipulations to ensure that State Register properties are marketed,
preserved, and reused, to the largest extent feasible. The MOA also outlines provisions for the
photographic documentation of contributing State Register properties proposed for demolition, and for
MHC review of proposed new construction.
The MHC anticipates continued consultation and cooperation with DCPO and the City of Northampton
regarding the marketing and redevelopment of the Private Development Parcels and, ultimately, in the
sensitive and successful redevelopment of the historic state hospital complex. The MHC supports the
waiver request.
These comments are provided to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (36 CFR 800), Massachusetts Genearal Laws, Chapter 9, Sec.
26-27c as amended by Charter 254 .of the Acts of 1988 (950 C1VM-- 71.00). and MEPA.
If you have additional questions, please contact Allen Johnson of this office.
Sincerely,
M Q. W
u *th B. McDonough
cutive Director
State Historic Preservation Officer
Massachusetts Historical Commission
cc: Northampton Historical Commission
Penelope Kim, Office of Planning & Development, City of Northampton
Dan Hughes, Office of Real Estate Management, DCPO
Will Donham, EARTH TECH
DEP/DWPC
MHD
220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 • (617) 727-8470
Fax: (617) 727-5128 TDD: 1-800-392-6090
r
City of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hall - 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 - (413) 586-6950
FAX (413) 586-3726
• Conservation Commission • Historical Commission
• Housing Partnership - Parking Commission
• Planning Board - Zoning Board of Appeals
March 24, 1997
Secretary Trudy Coxe
ATTN: MEPA Unit
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202
RE: Northampton State Hospital ENF
Dear Secretary Coxe:
On behalf of the Office of Planning and Development, the Planning Board and the Conservation
Commission, we would like to support the Northampton State Hospital ENF and the related
waiver filed by the Division of Capital Planning and Operations for the Northampton State
Hospital.
The ENF describes a project that is the culmination of over fifteen years of local planning and
consensus building. Our agreements with the Massachusetts Historical Commission and the
Division of Capital Planning and Operations, and numerous city and commonwealth planning,
environmental and traffic studies have identified the impacts of redevelopment and identified
how to minimize or mitigate and adverse impacts.
This project will allow development to proceed in accordance with Northampton's
comprehensive plan and our state hospital zoning. Please contact me or Wayne Feiden, Principal
Planner, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Penelope m, Ph.D.
Planning Di ector
ORIGINAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM
1. SUMMARY
A. Project Identification
1. Project Name Northampton State Hospital Site Disposition/Redevelopment
Address/Location Route 66 (Chapel Street/Vest Street/Earle Street) I
City/Town Northampton I
2. Project Proponent Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Division of
Address Capital Planning & Operations; 1 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108
3. Est. Commencement 1997: , Est. Completion 1997-1998 (conveyance phase)
Approx. Cost $ * . Status of Project Design 0 % Complete.
4. Amount (if any) of bordering vegetated wetlands, salt marsh, or tidelands to be dredged,
filled, removed, or altered (other than by receipt of runoff) as a result of the project.
0 acres 01 square feet.
5. This project is categorically included and therefore requires preparation of an EIR.
Yes X*.*- No ?
* Minimal costs are associated with the conveying the properties. Development costs will be determined during
the RFP selection process. -
It is anticipated that the future redevelopment of the project site will exceed one or more categorical inclusion
thresholds._.__ _
B. Narrative Project Description
Describe project and site.
0
U
The project involves the approximately 226 acre parcel of land located in the City of Northampton and
formerly known as the Northampton State Hospital. The site is currently a closed Department of Mental
Health facility owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Pursuant to Chapters 86 and 307 of the
Legislative Acts of 1994, the project involves conveyance of approximately 70 acres of land to the City of
Northampton, the Northampton Housing Authority, the Department of Food and Agriculture, and Smith
College, and conveyance of approximately 154 acres of land to a private developer(s) through the public
bidding process.
DCPO is preparing this Environmental Notification Form to initiate review of the project under the.
Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). DCPO will require in its Land Disposition Agreements
for the portion of the project site to be developed by the private developer(s) that said developers comply
fully with the MEPA review process prior to undertaking construction at the site. Hence, in accordance
with 301 CMR 11.18, and as discussed in more detail in the attached cover letter, the Commonwealth is
requesting the following waivers: 1) With respect to the Public Conveyance Parcels, the proponent requests
a waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR and authorization for the immediate disposition, remediation
and renovation of the parcels; and 2) With respect to the Private Development Parcels, the proponent
requests a waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR during the first phase of the project involving the
conveyance of the parcels to private developer(s).
A more detailed description of the project is included as Attachment A.
Copies of the complete ENF may be obtained from (proponent or agent):
Name: Fran Dowling Firm/Agency: Earth Tech
Address: 450 Bedford Street, Lexington, MA 02173'. Phone No. (508) 371-4000
1987 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT NOTICE. COMMENT PERIOD IS LIMITED.
For Information, call (617) 727-5830
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Narrative Project Description. This project involves approximately 226
acres of land located in the City of Northampton (the "City") and formerly known as the
Northampton State Hospital campus (the "Site"). The Site is currently a closed
Department of Mental Health ("DMH") facility, owned by the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (the "Commonwealth"). Furthering the Administration's initiative to
stimulate the productive economic reuse of closed State hospitals, in 1994, the State
Legislature approved Chapters 86 and 307 of the Legislative Acts of 1994 (the
"Legislation"), directing, and in limited instances authorizing, the disposition of the Site
by the Division. of Capital Planning and Operations ("DCPO") for reuse and
redevelopment by public and private entities. A complete listing of the conveyances, the
transfer recipients and the expected land uses is provided in Table 1 attached hereto.
Pursuant to the directives of the Legislation, the project involves:
1~ (i) conveyances to each of the City, the Northampton Housing Authority,
("NHA"), the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture
("DFA") and to Smith College for reuse and renovation for open-space,
recreational, conservation, agricultural, affordable housing and
municipal purposes (collectively referred to herein as the "Public
Conveyance/Project"). The Public Conveyance/Project encompasses a
I- total of approximately 70 acres of the Site (the "Public Conveyance
Parcels"); and
(ii) conveyances to. a private developer(s) through the public bidding
process to be redeveloped for recreational, open space, commercial,
institutional, light industrial, retail, residential, and/or other similar uses
(collectively referred to herein as the "Private Development
Conveyance/Project"). The Private Development Conveyance/Project
encompasses approximately 154 acres of land and 880,000 square feet
of buildings at the Site (the "Private Development Parcels").
I J As discussed below, this ENF addresses the potential impacts of the Public
Conveyance/Project. The impacts of the Private Development Conveyance/Project will
be addressed after completion of the public bidding process and will be reviewed through
the MEPA process during the development phase of the project.
This project provides a unique and important opportunity for redevelopment of
the Site to advance the Commonwealth's and the community's goals, including: (i)
preservation of open spaces and agricultural land, including agricultural preservation,
conservation restrictions and an historic park; (ii) preservation of the historic buildings
and landscapes in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement between the City, the
Massachusetts Historical Commission ("MHC") and DCPO; (iii) job creation and
economic growth; and (iv) the development of affordable housing and housing for DMH
clients.
2. Background. The project has been subject to numerous public review processes
which have spanned over 15 years. Any development at the Site must adhere to the
following use and development guidelines, which are the result of numerous studies and
public review hearings (collectively referred to herein as the "Guidelines").
a. The Citizens Advisory Committee ("CAC"), comprised of
representatives of the City of Northampton, local residents and other concerned
parties, was originally established by DCPO in 1985 to ensure that the needs and
concerns of the surrounding community would be incorporated into the reuse or
redevelopment of the Site. All CAC meetings are open to the public. The CAC
has adopted Development Guidelines for the Site and has approved the RFP for
the Private Development Parcels. Further, pursuant to the Legislation, any
developer(s) of the Site must consult with the CAC regarding planning,
development, construction and management decisions relating to the Site.
b. The Site is subject to the Legislation, which directs and, in limited
Iinstances, authorizes the conveyances described in this ENF and specifies the
Ll limitations on uses for the parcels, among other things. The Legislation embodies
the collective wisdom of numerous public review processes in which the CAC,
i the Mayor, the Planning Board and many other agencies and community members
participated for over the course of approximately 15 years.
c. The Site is currently subject to the "Northampton State Hospital
Plan" that encourages a mix of commercial and residential development and open
space preservation at the Site, as more fully described in Section IV of this ENF.
1
The rezoning of the Site is the result of a lengthy study process during which the
Northampton Office of Planning and Development and the Planning Board
sponsored numerous public hearings and forums and collected input from the
I
Mayor, City Councilors, City boards, the CAC and numerous Northampton
residents. The Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Recreation
Commission, Partnership for Economic Development and the Greater
L3
Northampton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors all voted unanimously to
endorse the zoning. Reuse and redevelopment of the Site will be subject to these
j1,
zoning guidelines.
d. The Northampton State Hospital campus was listed on the National
Register of Historic Places on July 25, 1994 in response to its nomination by the
MHC. Reuse and redevelopment of the Site will be subject to guidelines
described in a 1995 Massachusetts Historical Commission Memorandum of
Agreement (the "MHC MOA", included as Appendix 2 hereto).
During the RFP process, DCPO will abide by the provisions of the MHC
MOA. The MHC MOA establishes that any development proposed for the
campus must preserve the historic character-defining elements of the campus, if
feasible, while providing developers with significant flexibility to propose new
construction activities.
e. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between the City and
DCPO, the City and DCPO agree to use their best efforts to implement the
directives of the Northampton State Hospital Plan, the zoning regulations and the
CAC guidelines.
3. Public Conveyance/Project. Under the terms of the Legislation, DCPO will
convey certain parcels and easements on the Site totaling approximately 70 acres to the
City, DFA, NHA and Smith College. The Legislation directs that these parcels be used
j
for a variety of beneficial uses, including open space preservation, recreation,
conservation, community gardens, agriculture, municipal uses (e.g., school, public safety,.
facility, or athletic field) and affordable housing. A 100 foot conservation restriction and,,
I
public right-of-way easement running parallel to the Mill River will be granted to the
City for public use of foot trails for fishing, hiking, winter sports and nature study. DFA
nI
will receive an Agricultural Preservation Restriction on approximately 36 acres of the
lJ
Site (Parcel D) to ensure that its agricultural use is preserved. Although the Legislation
permits the use of Parcel C for a range of municipal uses, the City's current and
foreseeable plan is to use Parcel C for recreational purposes. Smith College intends to
use its easements for access roads and utilities serving its athletic fields. Six parcels
_
within the Public Conveyance/Project are being conveyed to NHA to be renovated for
affordable housing, housing for DMH clients and homeless shelters. One of the single
family residences and one homeless shelter are currently in use. The remaining
residences were previously used by DMH for staff residences and DCPO understands that
NHA intends to renovate these residences for affordable housing, housing for DMH
clients and shelter for the homeless.
4. Private Development Conveyance/Project. With respect to the remaining
approximately 154 acres of land and approximately 880,000 square feet of building space
comprising the Site, DCPO will issue a Request for Proposals ("RIP") for the
disposition, reuse and redevelopment of the Private Development Parcels. The RFP,
which has been reviewed and approved by the CAC, specifies that the reuse of the Site is
subject to the Guidelines which set forth specific objectives for the redevelopment of the
Site. As stated more fully in the RFP, these objectives include (i) preservation of open
spaces, including agricultural land preservation, conservation restrictions and an historic
park; (ii) preservation of the historic buildings and landscapes in accordance with the
MHC MOA; (iii) job creation and economic growth; and (iv) the development of
affordable housing and housing for DMH clients.
I
5. Waiver Request. Pursuant to 301 CMR 11. 18, for the reasons, and subject to the
conditions specified in the attached cover letter, the proponent hereby requests the
following waivers of the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report
(i) With respect to the Public Conveyance Parcels, the proponent requests a
waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR and authorization for the
immediate disposition, remediation and renovation of the parcels. Requiring
the preparation of an EIR would delay the realization of environmental, open
space and housing improvements, and could jeopardize commitments of
resources for the proposed uses, causing undue hardship to the recipients. No
environmental benefit is to be gained by requiring an EIR for the Public
Conveyance Parcels, as the entire project has been subject to numerous public
review processes and the current uses of the Public Conveyance Parcels, which
are overwhelmingly beneficial to the environment, will remain the same after
the conveyance, as specifically designated by the Legislation, and will have
insignificant impacts on the Site; and
(ii) With respect to the Private Development Parcels, the proponent requests a
waiver of the requirement to prepare an EIR during for the conveyance of the:
parcels at the Site to private developer(s). Preparing an EIR for the
conveyance phase will unnecessarily delay the initial conveyance phase of the
project and would not serve to minimize or avoid damage to the environment.
Pursuant to the Land Disposition Agreement, upon the transfer of the Private
j j Development Parcels, private developer(s) will become the proponent(s) of this
J project and will be required to complete the full MEPA review process prior to
_ undertaking any construction work on the Site and any open issues will be
I resolved during the preparation of the Draft and Final EIRs by the private
developers.
4
P.2
C. List the State or Federal agencies from which permits or other actions have been/will be sought:
Agency Name Permit Date filed; file no.
SEE ATTACHMENT B
D. List any government agencies or programs from which the proponent will seek financial assistance
for this project:
Agency Name Funding Amount
Chapter 132 of the Acts of 1993, as amended by Chapter 68 of the Acts of 1994, appropriated $5 million for the selected
I
demolition, asbestos and hazardous waste removal and abatement, if necessary, as well as for planning, marketing,
surveying, site evaluation and site preparation.
n.
E. Areas of potential impact (complete Sections II and III first, before completing this section).
1. Check all areas in which, in the proponent's judgment, an impact of this project may occur. Positive
impacts, as well as adverse impacts, may be indicated.
Construction Long ,Term
Impacts Impacts
Inland Wetlands
Coastal Wetlands/Beaches
Tidelands X
Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Open Space/Recreation positive
Historical/Archaeological X X
Fisheries/Wildlife
Vegetation/ Trees
positive
Agricultural Lands .
Water Pollution X
Water Supply/Use X
Solid Waste X
Hazardous Materials
Air Pollution X
Noise
ff Wind/Shadow
i Aesthetics . X
Growth Impacts X
Community/Housing and the positive
!l Il Built Environment . • • • • • • • • • •
Other (Specify)
Positive long-term impacts with regards to: 1) local economic activity/new taxes; 2) new
!L permanent jobs; 3) Commonwealth economic activity/new taxes
1 2. List the alternatives which have been considered.
SEE ATTACHMENT C
r-~
rl ATTACHMENT B
C.List the State or Federal agencies from which permits or other actions have been/will be sought:
At the present time, the proponent has no plans to take any action at the site except for the disposition of the
properties. For the Public Conveyance Parcels, it is anticipated that the permits listed below may be required
for the reuse and renovation of the parcels. Permitting requirements for the Private Conveyance Parcels will be
determined during the development phase of the project.
Agency Name
Permit
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
• Pre-Asbestos Removal Notice
• NPDES Permit(s) for Stormwater
Discharges from Construction
Activities*
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Section 404 Permit, if required
Massachusetts Department of Environmental
• Pre-Demolition Notice
Protection
• Pre-Asbestos Removal Notice
• Sewer Connection/Extension Permits
• Tier I Permit, if required under the
Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP)
(310 CMR40.00)**
Massachusetts Historical Commission
Determination of Effect on State Register
Properties
Massachusetts Highway Department
Curb Cut Permit
Department of Labor and Industries
Asbestos Removal Permit
* Permit requirements for operations will depend on specific uses
* * Site is not yet classified under the MCP
ATTACHMENT C
2. List the alternatives which have been considered.
1
Reuse plans for the Northampton State Hospital site have been explored periodically since the process of closing the
facility started in the mid-1970s. In 1985, DCPO appointed a Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) made up of
representatives of the City of Northampton, local residents and other concerned parties that has been involved in the
redevelopment process for a number of years.
Since that time the Commonwealth and the City of Northampton have undertaken a number of studies to assess the
1 redevelopment opportunities at the site. These include: Northampton State Hospital Re-Use Plan (Lozano ite.
Associates, 1982); Northampton State Hospital Plan (Northampton Office of Planning and Developmen 1982-1983
Northampton State Hospital Redevelopment Strategy (Center for Economic Development, 1984); Northampton State Hospital Re-Use Project Background Report (DCPO, 1986); and the DCPO Portfolio Review Report (RKG Associates,
Inc., 1992).
These studies and the CAC have considered a number of uses for the site including residential (both single- and multi-
family as well as elderly housing), open space, research and development/light industrial, and office. Future uses for the
site will be prepared by respondents to the RFP to be issued and will be reviewed through the CAC and MEPA processes.
Any users of the site will be subject to the Re-Use Plan, the Legislation that authorizes the disposition of the site, and the
applicable zoning for the site.
J
P.3
F. Has this project been filed with EOEA before? No X Yes EOEA No. -
P
L_I
G. WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS
1. Will an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (c.131s.40) or a License under
the Waterways Act (c.91) be required?
Yes - No X
2. Has a local Order of Conditions been:
a. issued? Date of issuance ; DEQE File No.
b. appealed? Yes ; No
3. Will a variance from the Wetlands or Waterways Regulations be required? Yes
No X
Note: With respect to the Private Development Parcels, the need for activities in or around wetlands will be determined
during the development phase of the project.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
D
A. Map; site plan. Include an original 81/2 x 11 inch or larger section of the most recent U.S.G.S.
7.5 minute series scale topographic map with the project area location and boundaries clearly
shown. If available, attach a site plan of the proposed oroiect.
The section of the U.S.G.S. quadrangle map, scale 1:25,000, which includes the site is attached:as: Figure 1 in
Appendix 1. A site disposition map is included as Figure 2 in Appendix 1.
226 acres.
B. State total area of project:
Estimate the number of acres 1(to 00the nearest 1/10 acre) directly affected that are currently:
1. Developed acres 6. Tidelands 0_ acres
2. Open Space/ 7. Productive Resources
82 acres Agriculture acres
Woodlands:`Recreation 44
_ 0 acres
3. Wetlands 0* i acres Forestry _
-.=O=*,,,, a c r e s 8. Other 0 acres
4. Floodplain
5. Coastal Area 0 i acres
* A potential wetland and/or 100 year floodplain on Parcel E may need to be delineated through the''
development process. -
C. Provide the following dimensions, ii applicable: Existing Increase Total
NA
NA
NA
-
th in miles
L
'5*
~
eng
Number of Housing Units
1-5
-
Number of Stories • • • •
_
880,000
-
-
Gross Floor Area in square feet
- NA
Number of parking spaces
- _ -
Total of Daily vehicle trips to and from site
•
< 100:
(Total Trip Ends)
d A ra a Daily Traffic on road(s)
Estimate ve g
serving site
1. West Street (North of Earle)*** 5,682
13,197
2. Route 10
3 Earle Street' 2,413
* The site contains two single family homes which have been converted into homeless shelters. The remaining single
family dwellings will be used for affordable housing, homeless shelters, and housing for MM clients.
The development program for the Private Development Parcels will be prepared by the private developer(s) during
the development phase of the project and evaluated in the EIR.
Source: P-ioneer.Vallcy Planning Commission, 1993 _
D. TRAFFIC PLAN. If the proposed project will require any permit for access to local roads orr
state highways, attach a sketch showing the location and layout of the proposed driveway(s).
PA
Ill. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Instructions: Explain direct and indirect adverse impacts, including those arising from general
construction and operations. For every answer explain why significant adverse impact is
--1 considered likely or unlikely to result. Positive impact may also be listed and explained.
J Also, state the source of information or other basis for the answers supplied. Such
environmental information should be acquired at least in part by field inspection.
A. Open Space and Recreation
1. Might the project affect the condition, use, or access to any open space and/or recreation
area?
Explanation and Source:
n SEE ATTACHMENT D
~l 2. Is the project site within 500 feet of any public open space, recreation, or conservation land?
Explanatiq^ ^•nd .Source:,.
Yes. ' Tiie site is adjacent io approximately 280 acres of land actively farmed by the Department of Food &
Agriculture. This DFA property includes walking and running trails throughout. The project site is also
n bordered to the east by the Smith College campus.
I _J
Source: Earth Tech
B. Historic and Archaeological Kesources
1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? (Prior
consultation with Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.)
Explanation and Source:
SEE ATTACHMENT D
2. Might any archaeological site be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with
Massachusetts Historical Commission is advised.)
1 Explanation and Source:
U No, There are no known archaeological sites that may be affected by the project.
Source: Earth Tech review of MHC files
u C. Ecological Effects
1. Might the project significantly affect fisheries or wildlife, especially any rare or endangered
species? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised).
I~ Explanation and Source:
SEE ATTACHMENT D
ATTACEDUNT D
A. Open Space and Recreation
1. Might the project affect the condition, use, or access to any open space and/or recreation area?
Explanation and Source:
Yes. The project will enhance open space and recreation/conservation interests. The Public Conveyance
portion of the project includes conveying land to the City of Northampton for uses including community
gardens, a historic park, and one parcel for use as either an athletic field, a school, or a public safety building.
Parcel D, comprising a total of 36 acres, will be conveyed to the Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA)
for preservation of agricultural land. In addition, three easements will be granted to Smith College for access
roads serving athletic facilities. Finally, development of the Private Development Parcels will require
compliance with the Re-Use Plan and review by the CAC, and several of the Private Development Parcels will
be subject to Conservation Restrictions.
Source: Earth Tech; Chapter 86 of the Acts and Resolves of 1994
B. Historic and Archaeological Resources
FI 1. Might any site or structure of historic significance be affected by the project? (Prior consultation with
iMassachusetts Historical Commission is advised.)
Explanation and Source:
Yes. In 1994, Northampton State Hospital campus was accepted for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places.
As described previously in the Project Description, DCPO has signed a Memorandum of Agreement:with..the
J Massachusetts Historical Commission (the MHC MOA). With respect to the Public Conveyance Parcels, the
MHC MOA recommends certain guidelines to be taken into account in the redevelopment of the parcels or the
demolition of any contributing buildings, if necessary. With respect to the Private Development Parcels, the
MHC MOA establishes that any development proposed for the campus must preserve the historic character of
the campus, if feasible, while providing developers with significant flexibility to propose new construction
activities. DCPO will demonstrate a good faith effort at marketing the campus for development which will
n preserve the existing buildings and landscapes. If DCPO does not receive acceptable proposals in response to
J a Request for Proposals, it may accept proposals that call for the demolition, rehabilitation and/or construction
of new buildings that do not conform with the preservation standards. DCPO will consult with MHC before it
1 accepts any such proposal.
Source: Review of Massachusetts Historical Commission files; Chapter 86 of the Acts and Resolves of 1994
C. Ecological Effects
U
1. Might the project significantly affect fisheries or wildlife, especially any rare or endangered species? (Prior
consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised).
Explanation and Source:
There are no known rare or endangered species identified on the project site. However, according to the
Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, the Walker's Limpet has been documented
to occur in a portion of the Mill River. In addition, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
federally-listed dwarf wedgemussel and the state-listed squawfoot mussel and eastern pondmussel are known
to occur in the Mill River. while the northern edge of the project site abuts the Mill River, there will be a
Conservation Restriction and right-of-way for recreational purposes along the portion of the site adjacent to
the Mill River.
Source: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, Natural Heritage and
Endangered Species Program; United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service;
Earth Tech
P.5
2. Might the project significantly affect vegetation, especially any rare or endangered species
of plant? (Prior consultation with the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program is advised.)
(Estimate approximate number of mature trees to be removed: Any tree removal will be determined
Explanation and Source: during the development phase of the project
No. According to the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, the project will not
adversely affect any rare or endangered species of plants, or any ecologically significant ecological
l community. The number of trees to be removed, if any, will be determined during the development phase of
the project.
Natural Heritage and
Source: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Division of Fisheries & Wildlife,
Endangered Species Program
3. Agricultural Land. Has any portion of the site been in agricultural use within the last 15 years?
If yes, specify use and acreage.
Explanation and Source:
Yes. As part of this project, eight acres of the project site currently being used as community gardens will be
transferred to the City of Northampton for permanent use as community gardens. addition, approximately
36 acres will be transferred to the Department of Food & Agriculture for permanent protection as agricultural l
land.
Source: Earth Tech; Chapter 86 of the Acts and Resolves of 1994
D. Water Quality and Quantity
C 1. Might the project result in significant changes in drainage patterns?
Explanation and Source:
If demolition of any existing buildings takes place, site runoff in anticipated to decrease significantly.
n However, assuming that the future development is of similar density as the existing buildings, it is anticipated
LJ that the amount of impervious surfaces will be restored to approximately the same as the existing conditions. j
Any changes will be analyzed and quantified and appropriate mitigation measures will be employed to!,
minimize potential water quality impacts. 1
Source: Earth Tech
2. Might the project result in the introduction of any pollutants, including sediments, into marine
j 1 waters, surface fresh waters or ground water?
LJ Explanation and Source: -
- When the project site is developed, mitigation measures will be employed to minimize potential impacts to
surface fresh water and groundwater. Drainage controls associated with redevelopment should be a
significant improvement over the current conditions.
Source: Earth Tech
None
3. Does the project involve any dredging? No X., Yes Volume . If 10,000
J cy or more, attach completed Standard Application Form for Water Quality Certification,
Part 1 (314 CMR 9.02(3), 9.90, DEQE Division of Water Pollution Control).
P.6
4. Will any part of the project be locatedin flowed or filled tidelands, Great Ponds, or other
waterways? (Prior consultation with the DEQE and CZM is advised.)
Explanation and Source:
No. The project will not be located in flowed or filled tidelands, Great Ponds, or other waterways, and is not
under the jurisdiction of M.G.L. Chapter 91.
Source: Earth Tech; MassGIS (data supplied by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, November
1995)
5. Will the project generate or convey sanitary sewage? No Yes X
If Yes, Quantity: gallons per day
Yes No X
Disposal by: (a) Onsite septic systems .
(b) Public sewerage systems (location; average and peak daily flows to
- treatment works) Yes X: No
Explanation and Source:
Yes. It is expected that the project will generate sewage. The municipal sewer system for the City of
l_ Northampton includes a treatment plant on Hockanum Road. According to treatment plant personnel, the
average daily flow is 4.5 million gallons per day (mgd), the peak flow is 6.8 mgd, and the design capacity is
r - 8.65 mgd. The project site is served by a 12-inch line along Route 66 and a 14-inch line along West Street,
and across the Mill River, a 36-inch line is maintained.
Source: Northampton State Hospital Re-Use Project, Background Report, DCPO, January, 1986; Earth Tech;
City of Northampton Department of Public Works
L l 6. Might the project result in an increase in paved or impervious surface over a soles source
L) aquifer or an aquifer recognized as an important present or future source of water supply?
Explanation and Source:
a No. The project site does not lie over a sole source aquifer or an aquifer recognized as an important present or
future source of water supply.
Source: Earth Tech; MassGIS
7. Is the project in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply?
Explanation and Source:
No. The project site is not in the watershed of any surface water body used as a drinking water supply.
Source: Earth Tech; MassGIS
r- 8. Are there any public or private drinking water wells within a 1/2-mile radius of the proposed
)J project?
Explanation and Source:
There are no public drinking water wells within a'/z-mile radius of the proposed project. Although there are
private drinking wells in the City of Northampton, these should not be impacted by the future development of
t
the site.
r-l
I Source: Earth Tech; MassGIS; City of Northampton Department of Public Works
P.7
9. Does the operation of the project result in any increased consumption of water? unici l
Approximate consumption gallons per day. Likely water source(s) M Pa
Explanation and Source:
It is expected that the project will result in some increased consumption of water. The municipal water system
supplies water to the project site and had met the needs of Northampton State Hospital when the facility was
fully operational. The site is served by a 12-inch line along West Street leading to six-inch lines along both
Prince Street and Earle Street, as well as by a six-inch line which enters the campus from the north along
Washington Avenue.
Source: Northampton State Hospital Re-Use Project, Background Report, DCPO, January, 1986.
E. Solid Waste and Hazardous Materials
1. Estimate types and
sewage sludge, construction debris from demolished structures. How/
domestic, hospital,
where will such waste be disposed of?
Explanation and Source:
Demolition will only occur after DCPO makes a good-faith effort to market the site "as-is," and after
consultation with MHC. If demolition does occur, the material will be removed by private licensed
commercial haulers and disposed of off-site at approved landfills and recycling facilities. At this time the
amount of demolition debris cannot be estimated. The redevelopment of the site will generate solid waste,
which will be defined once a redevelopment plan is formulated.
Source: Earth Tech
2. Might the project involve the generation, use, transportation, storage, release;;or disposal
of potentially hazardous materials?
Explanation and Source:
If demolition of the buildings is to take place, asbestos and asbestos-containing-materials from the buildings
will be disposed of as "Special Waste" in accordance with applicable state regulations. In addition, if any
additional materials are found that require disposal as hazardous waste, they will be disposed of as such.
Source: Earth Tech
3. Has the site previously been used for the use, generation, transportation, storage, release,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
Explanation and Source:
SEE ATTAci-R LENT E
F. Energy Use and Air Quality
1. Will space heating be provided for the project? If so, describe the type, energy source, and
approximate energy consumption.
Explanation and Source:
The specific space heating methods for each component of the future development of the project have not yet
been selected. The site is served by Bay State Gas Company and the Massachusetts Electric Company.
Source: Earth Tech; Northampton State Hospital Re-Use Project, Background Report, DCPO, January, 1986.
ATTACHMENT E
3. Has the site previously been used for the use, generation, transportation, storage, release, or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials?
Explanation and Source:
Yes. When the Northampton State Hospital was in operation, potentially hazardous materials were used and
stored at the site. The site was formerly listed as part of the Clean State Initiative. However, as further
described below, DCPO understands from DMH that the site has been de-listed. Although a recent site
assessment found a number of containers of oil and hazardous materials, including transformers containing
PCBs, batteries, cleaning agents, and dried paint cans, DCPO understands from DMH that, with the exception
of the transformers, all of these materials have been removed to Department of Environmental Protection's
(DEP) satisfaction in accordance with applicable state regulations and pursuant to walk-throughs with the
Office of Technical Assistance and the DEP. DCPO will require the transformers to be removed in accordance
with applicable laws, as well. .As part of the ongoing site assessment, no reportable releases of hazardous
materials have been discovered. In addition, many of the buildings contain lead paint, asbestos and asbestos-
containing-materials, which will be removed as described in subsection 1 and 2 above. Finally, the Site
contained nine underground storage tanks (USTs) which have been removed by DCPO and from which no
releases of petroleum were detected.
Source: Earth Tech
P.8
2. Will the project require process heat or steam? If so, describe the proposed system, the fuel
1
type, and approximate fuel usage.
Explanation and Source:
. After the specific tenants and uses for the future development of the project site are selected, further study will
':be conducted in order to determine whether process heat or steam is required.
Source: Earth Tech
3. Does the project include industrial processes that will release air contaminants to the
atmosphere? If so, describe the process (type, material released, and quantity released).
Explanation and Source:
At the present time, the specific tenants and uses for the future development of the site have not yet been
identified. After the specific tenants and uses are selected, further study will be conducted in order to define
the levels of air emissions and appropriate mitigation measures.
Source: Earth Tech
4. Are there any other sources of air contamination associated with the project (e.g. automobile
traffic, aircraft traffic, volatile organic compound storage, construction dust)?
Explanation and Source:
Any future demolition and construction phases of the project will generate dust. However, standard measures
to minimize these fugitive dust emissions will be employed. The impacts are expected to, be minimal,!
temporary and occur only during the demolition and construction phases of the project. When the project site.
is developed, potential sources of air contamination will include additional traffic and heating equipment.
Further study will define the levels of air emissions and appropriate mitigation measures.
Source: Earth Tech .
5. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g. hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be
u affected by air contamination caused by the project?
Explanation and Source:
The project site is adjacent to low to moderate density residential areas to the northeast, east and south.
However, due to the size of the project site, the natural buffer between the project site and the surrounding!
neighborhoods, and the employment of construction mitigation measures, the project is not expected to create
significant or permanent air quality impacts on any sensitive receptors.
Source: Earth Tech
G. Noise
1. Might the project result in the generation of noise?
(Include any source of noise during construction or operation, e.g., engine exhaust, pile
driving, traffic.)
Explanation and Source:
Temporary increases in noise levels within the site boundaries will occur during any potential demolition and
construction phases of the project. These impacts are expected to be minimal, temporary and to occur only
during the demolition and construction phases of the project. Operational period noise impacts, if any, will be
addressed in the EIR.
Source: Earth Tech
P.9
t
2. Are there any sensitive receptors (e.g., hospitals, schools, residential areas) which would be
affected by any noise caused by the project?
1 Explanation and Source:
The project site is adjacent to low to moderate density residential areas to the northeast, east and south.
However, due to the size of the project site, the natural buffer between the project site and the surrounding
neighborhoods, and the employment of construction mitigation measures, noise from any future development
is not expected to create significant or permanent impacts on sensitive receptors.
Source: Earth Tech
3. Is the project a sensitive receptor, sited in an area of significant ambient noise?
Explanation and Source:
The former use of the site as a hospital for the mentally ill, was a sensitive receptor. Future redevelopment of
the project site could include residential areas. The project site is not in an area of significant ambient noise.
Source: Earth Tech
H. Wind and.Shadow
1 1. Might the project cause wind and shadow impacts on adjacent properties?-
Explanation and Source:
No. Due to the size of the project site, and the natural buffer between the project site and the surrounding
neighborhoods, any new development is not expected to cause wind or shadow impacts on adjacent properties.
Source: Earth Tech
I
j j 1. Aesthetics
L_J 1. Are there any proposed structures which might be considered incompatible with existing
adjacent structures in the vicinity in terms of size, physical proportion and scale, or
significant differences in land use?
Explanation and Source:
At the present time, no new structures are being proposed. Any future development will be designed to be'
l compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and land uses, and will be subject to review by DCPO, MHC, I
J the City of Northampton and the CAC.
Source: Earth Tech
2. Might the project impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas?
Explanation and Source:
No. The project will not impair visual access to waterfront or other scenic areas. It is anticipated that as part
of any future development scenarios, a portion of the project site might be set aside as protected open space.
Source: Earth Tech
Discuss consistency with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, open space,
recreation and environmental plans and policies. Consult with local or regional planning
authorities where appropriate.
SEE ATTACHMENT F
Il
LJJ
P.10
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH PRESENT PLANNING
V. FINDINGS AND CERTIFICATION
A. The public notice of environmental review has been/will be published in the following
newspaper(s):
j
Daily Hampshire Gazette;
(NAME) (Date}
February 20, 1997
B. This form has been circulated to all agencies and persons as required by 301 CMR 11.24.
za zis(
Date Si ature o Responsible Officer Date Signature of person preparing
or Project Proponent ENF (if different from above)
Christopher Lane, Director Willard Donham
Name (print or tvoe) Name (print or type)
Office of Real Estate Management,
Address Division of Capital Planning & Operations Address Earth Tech
100 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02202 450 Bedford St., Lexington, MA 0217=
Telephone Number (617) 727-8090 Telephone Number (508) 371-4000 i
ATTACHMENT F
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH PRESENT PLANNING
Discuss consistency with current federal, state and local land use, transportation, open space, recreation
and environmental plans and policies. Consult with local or regional planning authorities where
appropriate.
In 1985, when the process of disposing of and redeveloping the Northampton State Hospital site started in earnest,
DCPO established a CAC in anticipation that a majority of the land would be declared surplus. In part, the purpose of
the CAC was to ensure that the needs and desires of the surrounding community were an important piece of the process
for any future reuse or redevelopment of the Northampton State Hospital campus.
As mentioned previously, since that time, the Commonwealth and the City of Northampton have undertaken a number
of studies to assess the redevelopment opportunities at the site.
In 1994, after the passage of legislation authorizing the disposition of the site, DCPO convened a new CAC, which is
made up of representatives from the Northampton Chamber of Commerce (two seats), the Northampton Development
Corporation, the Alliance for the Mentally Ill (two seats), the Northampton Labor Council, the Northampton Housing
Partnership, the Pioneer Valley Community Development Corporation, the Hampshire Community Action Committee,
the Department of Mental Health, the City Council Industry Committee, the Franklin/Hampshire County Private
Industry Council, as well as the Mayor of the City of Northampton. The CAC reviewed, approved, and had
considerable input into the use and redevelopment of the so-called Public Conveyance Parcels and the RFP that is being
- issued by DCPO for the reuse and redevelopment of the so-called Private Development Parcels, consisting of 154 acres
of land and approximately 880,000 square feet of building space.
In addition, the site is currently subject to zoning overlay districts that encourage a mix of commercial and residential
development and open space preservation. The overlay districts are the result of a two-year study process during which
the Northampton Office of Planning and Development and the Northampton Planning Board sponsored numerous
public hearings and forums and collected input from the Mayor's Office, City Councilors, City boards, the CAC and
from numerous residents. The Planning Board, Conservation Commission, Recreation Commission, Partnership for
Economic Development, and the Greater Northampton Chamber of Commerce Board all voted unanimously to endorse
the zoning.
As a result, on April 8, 1993, the Northampton Planning Board adopted the Northampton State Hospital Plan as an
element of the Northampton General Plan. The Northampton Planning Board initiated this study to ensure that the
J reuse of the State Hospital campus is consistent with the goals of the community. The Executive Summary of this
document outlined the Northampton Planning Board's goals and objectives for the site.
These include:
1. Any redevelopment should insure that the unique resources [of the campus] are protected.
2. The main hospital complex, including the Historic Main Complex, Haskell Building, and Memorial Complex
should be rezoned to create a mixed-use village-center.
3. Areas well suited for housing in existing residential areas should be maintained at a density in keeping with
surrounding residential areas.
4. The School Department should determine if the future school needs can and should be met on Parcel A or other
parcels.
5. The vast majority of the existing open space should be protected for farmland, recreation and conservation.
6. The Conservation Commission and the Department of Food and Agriculture should attempt to acquire open space
and agricultural lands, mostly on the west side of the complex.
7. Traffic, including pedestrian traffic, and infrastructure issues, must be addressed prior to any significant
development in Northampton, including the redevelopment of the main complex.
8. Every effort should be made to preserve and reuse existing structures of architectural and historical significance,
but unrealistic historic preservation requirements that will impede or prevent development should not be adopted.
APPENDIX 1
Figures
w
U
Q
s
112
J
Z
o0
O ~
v ~
0
o
~
Y
a
e C~
Y
~
cf ~Y Yr
zS~Y~~
O
~
i
Y^
~ryn
g
ry~
~
w
j
I
g
<t Clm m~WYY
~
U
°
aa
n° a8N
c
a
E-
P-4
o O
o
Z
m
m
O W
H C/)
p
H
co zw6
O
y
x
O
z
APPENDIX 2
Memorandum of Agreement between
The Massachusetts Historical Commission,
The Division of Capital Planning & Operations, and
The City of Northampton
Memorandum of Agreement
Regarding the Northampton State Hospital
By and Between
The Massachusetts Historical, Commission
and
Division of Capital Planning and Operations
r ` THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT entered into as of the day of
1995 by and between the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC), the Division
of Capital Planning and Operations (DCPO), and the City of Northampton (City).
WHEREAS, the Northampton State Hospital (NSH) has been listed in the State and
National Registers of Historic Places;
I WHEREAS, Chapter 86 of the Acts of 1994, as amended by Chapter 307 of the Acts of
1994 (as so amended, the "Act") authorizes the disposition of the NSH property by DCPO, some
portions of which will be marketed and other portions of which will be disposed of to the
recipients identified in said Act;
WHEREAS, the City has proposed a plan for the NSH as an element of the Northampton
General Plan, which includes the possible reuse or demolition of historically significant buildings,
J new construction, and preservation of agricultural lands and open space under city zoning;
WHEREAS, the City has been consulted by DCPO and MHC and has been invited to
concur in this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA);
WHEREAS, the Act authorizes or directs DCPO to convey ownership or interests-in the
following land or buildings to specified parties:
(i) Easement to Smith College on Parcel K
.11•
1, 1 (ii) Halligan and Daley Monument to the City of Northampton
} (iii) Parcel D to the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture
` J iv Conservation and right-of-way easement to the City of Northampton on
Parcel A
v Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the Northampton Housing Authority
(vi) 91 Grove Street to the City of Northampton
~ a.
(vii) Parcel C to the City of Northampton
(viii) Parcel G (community gardens) to the City of Northampton
(the above-listed parcels are referred to as the "named disposition parcels"); and
Page 1
DCPO will be conveying these parcels pursuant to the Act and the applicable stipulations of this
MOA, but will not be marketing these parcels pursuant to Section II of this MOA.
NOW; THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that the following points of agreement will be
followed in order to take into account the affect on historically significant properties of the disposal
of NSH in accordance with M.G.L. Ch. 9, ss. 26-27C (950 CMR 71).
Stipulations
DCPO, the City, and MHC will ensure that the following stipulations are implemented:
I. The Northampton State Hospital Campus
A. For the purposes of this Memorandum of Agreement, it is understood that:
6
1. The MHC, following the guidelines of the National Register criteria (36 CFR 60),
has determined that the Northampton State Hospital Campus (hereinafter, the
Campus) is eligible for listing as a historical district on the National Register of
Historic Places. The MHC voted on June 8, 1994 to confirm the eligibility of the
Campus for listing on the National Register and sent this nomination for listing to
the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places. The Keeper of the National
Register of Historic Places listed the Campus on the National Register on July 25,
1994.
2. The MHC regards the buildings and landscapes at the Campus listed as Status "C
in Attachment A as properties contributing to the historic character of the Campus.
The MHC regards all other buildings and structures as non-contributing. This list
of contributing buildings and landscapes is a part of the Northampton State Hospital
Historic District, which is itself a part of the State Hospital and State Schools of
l Massachusetts Multiple Property Submission.
I,.,1J 3. The MHC regards the following attributes of the contributing buildings and
landscapes on the Campus (all of which address exterior areas only) as character-
defining elements for the purposes of re-use planning:
• Building and structure exteriors;
• Fenestration;
• Scale;
• Color,
• Use of Material;
• Mass;
• Organization of the landscape;
• Views from, to and across the landscape;
• Curvilinear circulation system conforming to the hilly terrain;
• A campus-like organization of buildings among predominantly mature
landscape, in particular, the relationship of the dominant historic building
massing at the crest of the hill to the smaller scaled and sized structures of
heterogeneous building type sited along the slopes of the hill;
• The use of masonry, particularly red brick, as exterior building materials for
those buildings at the crest of the hill; and
Page 2
• The use of wood frame and cladding nearer the perimeter locations of the
campus.
Interiors of the buildings and structures are not character-defining elements.
4. Nothing contained in this MOA constitutes concurrence by the DCPO with any of
the MHC's determinations or opinions concerning the historic character of any
portion of the Campus. Nothing contained in this MOA constitutes an agreement
by, or binds, DCPO to seek legislative authorization to dispose of the Campus (or
any part thereof) or otherwise, with or withoui legislation, to proceed with
disposition of the Campus (or any part thereof). The decision whether and when to
make or pursue any disposition respecting the Campus or any part of it is in the sole
discretion of DCPO and the Legislature.
5. All parties to this MOA acknowledge that the uses to which the Campus has been
put in the past may change in the near future as new uses may be found for the
buildings formerly used for mental health purposes. These new uses may
themselves change over time, according to the market and the goals of the
community.
B. DCPO and the City are encouraged to include historic preservation in any redevelopment
process. Options for reuse of the Campus which incorporate historic preservation should take into
account the following principles in reuse planning:
1. Preservation of the character-defining features of the contributing buildings and
l~
landscapes of the Campus should be encouraged if feasible.
2. If it is determined that it is not feasible to preserve all of the character defining
features of the contributing buildings and landscapes of the campus, the feasibility
of preserving the character-defining features of portions of the contributing
buildings and landscapes of the campus will be examined, and encouraged where
feasible.
3. Rehabilitation of contributing buildings and new construction on the Campus
should be consistent with the recommended approaches in the Secretary of the
TT'_-__
B~iildinas (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1
hereinafter "Standards").
II. Marketiu Plan
A. Notwithstanding any provisions of this MOA, DCPO has full marketing authority for the
Campus and will make all final marketing decisions. In the event that DCPO plans to implement a
marketing plan, DCPO will consult with the MHC and the City in the preparation of such
marketing plan for the Campus (other than the named disposition parcels, interests or ownership in
which will be conveyed as provieded in the Act) which shall include the following elements:
An appendix prepared by MHC for submission to DCPO on or before thirty (30)
days from written notice from DCPO that explains what MHC regards as the
Page 3
significance and the character-defining elements of various buildings and
landscapes, and information concerning potential tax benefits. DCPO will have the
j right to reasonably approve such appendix within fourteen (14) days of submission
and prior to its inclusion in any marketing materials. If DCPO and MHC cannot
agree on the appendix, DCPO shall amend the appendix if necessary to state that it
contains MHC's opinions only and may then at DCPO's discretion proceed with the
- marketing plan.
DCPO will include a photograph and a parcel map of the campus.
I
DCPO will make reference to the points listed under I.B. and any plan developed
based on these points. The information package and the marketing plan as a whole
j will make a good faith effort to generate interest in the preservation of what the
MHC has defined as the historic character of the property.
~j 2. DCPO will develop an initial distribution list as part of the marketing package and
l will include on such list any contact offered by MHC and the City.
3. - DCPO will prepare an advertising plan and schedule.
4. DCPO will prepare a schedule for receiving and reviewing submissions.
i. B. MHC and the City will have 30 days to review and comment on the draft marketing plan. If
-1 MHC or the.City does not find the draft marketing plan acceptable, DCPO will make reasonable
efforts exercised in good faith to accommodate the concerns of MHC and re-submit a final
marketing plan. Before implementation, MHC and the City will have 21 days to review and
comment on the portions of the final marketing plan which address issues of historic preservation.
In the event that MHC does not provide its initial comments on the draft marketing plan within 30
days or its comments on the final marketing plan within 21 days, the plan shall be deemed
acceptable to the MHC. It is understood that the content of the marketing plan shall not require
approval of MHC or the City.
C. The marketing effort shall be continued for no less than three months from the date of the initial
~_5 implementation of the marketing plan subject to any contrary requirements of legislation which may
be enacted. Implementation shall occur when the marketing package is distributed to the initial
distribution list.
i
D. If, after consultation with the MHC for a technical review of duration no greater than thirty
(30) days with regard to the applicability of the "Standards" to the submissions, but, in its sole
j determination, DCPO receives no acceptable submissions that are feasible and acceptable to DCPO
for an individual parcel or for the Campus as a whole that provide for rehabilitation or new
construction in conformance with the recommended approaches in the "Standards," it will convey
these conclusions to the MHC and the City.
1. For all such buildings and landscapes for which there was no preservation
~-submission that is feasible and acceptable to DCPO, to its sole discretion, then
DCPO or any buyer of the property or any other person can proceed with
demolition of buildings or rehabilitation or new construction that does not conform
to the "Standards" following completion of photographic recordation and
( documentation as stipulated in Section V.
Page 4
2. Unless prior to the expiration of MHC's marketing review period [as outlined in
Section II (A)(1)], N4HC notifies DCPO in writing that MHC considers the
marketing plan to materially fail to encourage preservation, MHC will provide its
written opinion that any such demolition permitted under Section II(D)(1) does not
constitute anticipatory demolition, as this term is used in federal Section 106
review. MHC shall provide this opinion promptly upon request by DCPO or any
Buyer of the property.
E. In the event that a building or landscape that does not generate preservation interest in the initial
marketing effort and is not demolished prior to the commencement of a subsequent formal
marketing effort, DCPO will make reasonable efforts exercised diligently to support the
development of the property in a manner consistent with the principles listed in I.B.
III. New Construction
A. DCPO shall encourage new buildings and landscapes that are sympathetic or compatible to
what MHC has determined to be character-defining attributes of the contributing buildings and
landscapes on the Campus, including a campus-like organization of buildings in predominantly
mature landscape; the curvilinear circulation system conforming to the hilly terrain; the relationship
of the dominant historic building massing at the crest of the hill to the smaller scaled and sized
structures of heterogeneous building types sited along the slopes of the hill, the use of masonry,
particularly red brick, as the predominant exterior building materials for these buildings and
masonry or wood frame and cladding for buildings at perimeter locations of the campus. It is not
necessarily desirable, however, for new buildings and landscapes to mimic construction styles or
materials of the existing buildings with twentieth century materials. For example, new buildings
need not have red brick exteriors or otherwise use the same materials or construction as were used
on the existing buildings.
L_ Other Design Guidelines which vary from the Zoning Code also would be acceptable, provided
that requirements relating to materials, siting, and massing are addressed. MHC and the City will
have 30 days to review and comment on the final draft of any such additional design guidelines
` I which vary from the zoning ordinance or this MOA. DCPO shall have design review authority.
I_ I IV. Exempted Activities
A. The following construction activities are unlikely to affect what MHC regards as the character-
defining attributes of the Campus and are exempted from further review by the MHC, including
`Jr comments in any environmental review process:
F_ Resurfacing, maintenance, repair or improvement of existing parking lots, roads, and
driveways.
• Repair, replacement or improvements to infrastructure, i.e. heating and electrical
systems, sewer, water, ventilation systems, or plumbing.
Page 5
• Maintenance work such as painting, repair or replacement of substantially in-kind
architectural elements.
• All interior work.
• Maintenance, repair, or replacement of substantially in-kind landscape features.
• Demolition or alterations of non-contributing structures.
• New construction on parcels C, D, and E. (See Attachment B, the parcel identification
map).
• New construction of 40' or less in height, excluding mechanical systems, on Parcels F,
B (south of Grove Street), K (the eastern half), and J.
V . Photographic Recordation and Documentation
A. Prior to demolition of any contributing building, disposition of any part of the Campus,
- substantial new construction or other major change to the landscape of the Campus, DCPO shall
require that the buildings, structures and designed open spaces of the Campus are documented by
photographs and narratives in accordance with a "recordation plan" that satisfies all of the
following:
1. Provides for documentation of the historical processes that shaped the organization,
design and history of Northampton State Hospital. (The nomination of the Campus
to the National Register prepared by MHC is sufficient documentation.)
f 2. Contains photographs and documentation of the character-defining attributes.
3. Includes but is not limited to elements listed in Attachment C.
4. Is reviewed and commented upon by MHC.
5. Provides that copies of the resulting documentation are made available to the MHC,
the City of Northampton, and, if any federal funds are used, the Library of
Congress.
V1. Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits
A. In order to ensure that rehabilitation of buildings that MHC believes contribute to the historical
significance of the Campus can qualify for applicable tax credits, DCPO shall encourage any
designated developer to consult with MHC and the National Park Service for the purpose of
meeting tax credit standards in any work to be completed.
Page 6
VII. Coordination with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Massachusetts Enviro=ental Policy
Act
A. If any state or federal agency funding, license, or permit is contemplated or required for the
rehabilitation or demolition of any contributing building or landscape on the Campus, or for new
r construction on any contributing landscape, DCPO shall provide a copy of this MOA to any project
proponent which is hereby on notice that notice and review procedures under the National Historic
Preservation Act, 16 USC 470 et. seq. (including sections 106 and 110) (36 CFR 800), the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and/or the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act
- (MEPA) may be applicable to any such project, requiring notice and review by the appropriate
federal agency, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) and/or the
r~ MEPA unit, as applicable, as early as possible during the planning stages of the project to the
i extent required by such laws. A copy of this MOA shall be included in the documentation
submitted to the federal agency, the Advisory Council, and/or the MEPA Unit, along with MHC's
written comments concerning the project, which shall be used to document a good faith effort to
I consult with the MHC concerning historic preservation. MHC, DCPO, and all parties interested in
the project agree that if the procedures in this MOA are fulfilled in compliance with this MOA,
MHC's comments will provide that, even if there is an adverse impact or effect on the historic
resources, all reasonable, prudent and feasible means and actions required to mitigate such adverse
impact or effect on such historic resources -have taken place under said laws and this MOA and that
it is in the public interest to proceed with the project.
Execution and implementation of this Memorandum of Agreement evidences that DCPO has
f~_T afforded MHC reasonable opportunity to comment on the re-use of Northampton State Hospital.
r Page 7
VIII. Modifications
Any party to this MOA may request that it be amended or modified whereupon the parties will
-.l consult in accordance with 950 CMR 71 to consider such amendment or modification.
J Executed as of the date first above written.
(-I Division of Capital Planning and Operations (DCPO):
By:
' Lark Jurev Palermo
Commissioner
Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC):
By: l~ U4t,0H
McDonough
D~tor
City of Northampton (City):
By:
Mary L. Ford
Mayor
i
%I
IJ,
Page 8
',-_1 ATTACHMENT A PAGE of 3
wi
i UI
a
pi
O
W
r it
C-1
:Z1
:4
j j
l ~
I
L-11
JI
H
~I
E-I
UI
WI
E-4
H
UI
al
~I
a
WI
t:.
~i
WI
al
W
a
E-
M
._:JOU]wgq W gggqr,-a' PgCAq _~.:~G:gggqqqqq q q qq ggCgqqu~qG._'.
U U U U
"..'Ur,;:JUUUUUZ000UU UUUHUUUU2UZUUUUZUUUUUVU:J
J
nr~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.3 0
-j 17~
-I i4 i4 ~-4 i-I N rl
0 0 0 O O C.
r-v
r-i
CJ
0 r r r r lV (V
'll Q) > > > v >
_
(n uz.~.~_~.~.~.~.~.~•~ r
_
r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri
-
tU fl),_ O O C O O O O O 1
-
.-.UUC: UUUUU I--I
V
•J
_ 1J
r L
L
U7
UQ 1J
>
>
D O
0
0
(D
0 0
>
U U
0 a) U
U
= U
fD
'll Q)
C
- 'J r; J
J..1 TS
7J
v
V ro
(1) G)
r Sl. r. Q)
a)
(i
J (1)
r
Q) (0 -
• H ti) TlJ
( 4 . Q)
a)
)
(i) Q)
r.
• r I _
(1) U r! r-1
r-1
r--1
rl rl
0
O O
Q)
- r
~4
r CO
O
~'D O
O
D (D ; ul
Ul r•l 0 CD (Z) C7 CD Z) C7 C^ 0 0 C
_ =1 Ql M rn -V I'D Lr) Cl- 'I_n 'J M M r-' :--i C
Gl Gl cc of co CO Cb it , co C. G) C) C%
WI 1 N C•1 Ln Ln co oo N Ul N co N ~ O 7l 0 0 0 N Ln to
E-+ D000`1NMMLn NM :D COCA l~l C. .'C' Q'c* M~MC~.-•-
mOJCT01CilGlC1CTmCT r rQlm r Z (`c co co r r r (0m (0 00 r (0 (0 (d (0 ral G)mm mm CO G`.
A r-I r-( r-I .-I -4 --I :-1 r1 r-i U U U U U U ri u r-1 U U U U U U r-
>s as L
C G ~
r
Q)
s 3 3 w Q) m r;
'O -LJJ1~.1Q WU449 F- E 0 (1) Q) ( 0 t 0 0) Q)
r1 or. m X X X X X , ~4 J-) ro 44
q r rl Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) (!1 U1 Ul• ul •rl 1J J 1J Q) .u -0 Q) (1) .u Q) (1) Q) r--I (0
3 r rl r1 r-I r-1 rl Qn)~ a) y ~ ~ Ul q) a) Q) a) Q) a) Q) 11 Q) Q) Q) L
as 0) Ol a a a a a Q) (1) a O a Q) . Sa a) Q) ~l }4 rl S4 S4 ~4 r".
n C. .u a) r I~ E F- F, I; ~4 m ) 14 ~4 .!J a) -0 Q) a Q) -LJ 1, m -L) (1) q s~
a • i 71 E -rl •r{ 0 0 O O O 0 0 1~ r0 Lv -Li is Ul 11 .ll m 0) U) Ol to U) U) iT cn a) rd u
Ul 1 " G S
Z 1) rO " ro 'a u U U U U r-♦ -1 O Ul M a) Ul Ul (0 U) U) it 10 Ul (d co
C)
X rl 0 -1 r--I a a x Q) I Q) }-1 Q) Q) }•4 r-I S4 - }4 r•--I r--I ~4 r Q) 0 (d
C7 S4 .r.( U •ri •ri r-1 r-1 r-1 -1 r--1 E~ F 4J S4 M J l1 11 (0 r-1 Q) (1) > (0 Q) (0 1) (0 (L) N (0 U ~4 a.) -11 -1 ~ u
2 0 0 ~:J ~J (d (0 (d (0 (0 W W - 1.1 Q) M L() (0 Ul Ul 0) ~4 > > 0 U) S-( 01 ~4 }M a a -~j w r(
H QQ r71.,i rQ q -rl •rl •r-I •ri •r-I Ul Q) U ? 3 0 0 0 ~ ~ :I (d CQ 'S" (d S~1 }~1 (0 I 4 a(d w rO
-rq 0 0 0 O 0 1J 1J Ul 'Q) •r'( I Gi C7 (D U U a Q) ~4 Q)
H • rI ~-4 > 1~ a~ i i i i r ~4 :J ~4 r-I U) M ri c- Ln m N 03 a U 3 ~:j ri
m (_+~4 9 P4 z z z z z Z~E: Z Ul Z Z W r-iZH-i NLnmr-1 N N Nc--I C*1 Ul Qa Q4 W Z
xk
r•i
P4
d O :--I N M Ln to r- CO CT O r-1 N M -v m to C,- of a) O rl c,4 M -p Ln lD C- co m c)
M o m LD C-- m m r--1 -i H ri ,--I r-1 r-1 r1 -4 (11 N N N N N N N N N M M M ('n M M M M M rn
v+
0-
ATTACHMENT A - PACE 2 of 3
I 1
C1~
C-4
E•4
w Ei
~ W
~ W
x x
U ~
Q
Q
. 2 H
~ U
• E4H
P4
r Ea
ax ~
H
R:
0
-z
W
U
a
D
O
W
cY ]q mmCQ W O0.1 mm mm m co C*- mcaCQP' ca p]m m mco UIU)cl, ~ C]co
E-4 1 U U ~j
vl V U U U /ti /-y iCy U U U U U U H U U U H U U U U U U r=r H U U ~./J U U U L/
E4
U
W
E4
H
x
U
C
WI
HI
Ull
WI
al
al
~I
Ei
W
WI
ELI
A
0
z
H
A
a
H
x
al
Q1
~i
cl.
,D O O
C C ~
J ~ :J
r n L
N r 0 C r
i0 r0 C C CC. C r0 m u rz~
.r-i H r, .h -,..I .,..I .ry -ri C •-1 .H •-i •ra •-i -r; .r; •.-i
~4 14 --I --i r-! ;-4 14 1•4 ~4 ~4 G ;4 ~4 }4 ~4 )4 ;4 1-d S4 ;4
r6 r r rr (0 03 N z c0 co co rr < 60 ris r0 r3 r0 m ru m m
L L •ri •r-i rl -n' •-i 1 J-" L -1 J-0 L L J J J J 1J
•-r •-i C C". '4 :•-i U •-i .,A .ri --i •ri C •ri - -i -r-i -r-; --i -r-i
-i r-1 O O .J OJ O 7 -1 --i N --i --1 --i -4 --1 i -
-ri - r-I --i -r' V --i r0 r-i rr.. •ri --i -r-I iJ -ri -r-i -r-i -ra •r-i - r-4 - r-I .r-I --f ro Cu- - : i>✓ v _
-L) O O O O O O (0 y 0-L) Ll y U li -L) L)
41 _u
U: (A
O o o c c o 0 o c o C
O t- N _ C' Cl '1T c In U'l rn ("1 r"
Gl OJ x m Gl Gl = - _ - G-1 Gl c:'.
Ln Gl t- k o O 0 -4 Gl O C (Z-1 -'J O C
• Cl c`l U'l 110 rn .-.I 1'.0 \D lD r) k0 rn ,-D O Ln i'D Ul .
-
Oa)in ,c"i 0m m mmcca) m0) r3 0c1~.^, rrco cc
--I - U e-i --t ri --i ri U - --1 U U U U
tT
N
• -I • ri r--I N O
N 3 ::I U 0 Ul N U)
1a N A u u E ro rO >
0 (0 (0 a) ul co Q) m -75
ro 14 ~4 1.1 it s~ 44 U) ~4
}
0) Q) N }l O
W N N rid ro 1~ I~ (0 N i) -L-) r-4 M ~ S4
: ~ y4 •ri M (D O O O -'1 01 r^d ~ O O O
O s~ O O N .1.1 I) ro 0 . rC O M ~ Id )2i O --1 .U li 1J
~4 -r-1 ?4 ~4 b1 cn cn N Ul 3rd U) •-i U) t0 U U U
rd N ro r» 0 0 r0 -I C+ N U) N v N S. ~4 ~4 N N N
~4 N --1 ~j ~-4 U!1 ~:l t71 41 U) ~4 O !-1 O s~
•-i •-i - 1 - I r0 U N'~ W r0 ~ O r101 s~ G N ~ N ~i r0 O u S~
N O ~ ~ --1 r0 r0 b) O Q4 >1 M O x H N ?4 U) O y w U 4-4 CO --1 O O O
0) CA as --i •r-1 -r-I S4 •-I r0 ~i ~4 ~4 x ro E UO U0 ~4 x q -H ~l U U U
c0 N ~i s4 N S4 N N N N 0 a CQ -Hl PQ N^ ~--I _ }4 U
r, a W N 1~ o --i
s4 N O o a U s~ tr r-l U l N U r4 W
O N -11 . ri Ul E E ~4 q Ol -IJ ~4 S4 r0 3 rCS ~4 ~4 f4 F4 •-I --1 •-i E ~-4 U U U
1.1 ~4 M 0 r0 N N M M CD N •ri O O •-i O N N b X r0 r0 (Z 0 z rd a) b) .
i (DZZ r~r~xwPQ xwUzWx(J OwC)MPQ X ~
cV rnarml0 immcD --IN Mcl+ll),oC-mmO--INMCv U1lO1-00m0 -iN rr)l m
lczr "clr 10 'Ili d+ 'IT d+ m m m m In m m m m to 1'0 1,0 l0 l0 lD "D lD lD w lD C- C- t- C-- C- r-
N
~4
~ a
• ri :-J
-.1 U
^-1 O
- r-i
1
:4
O
U
N
1-0
c!l
W
U
a
0
U1
W
C
a
Fl.
H
0
E-+
n
lj
•D
C ill U)
7Zj)G)G)
• n • r-1 • ri • -I
J J J .J
J 1.7 L 1.1
O O O O
U U U U
Ln
N
J
ti)
r
c.
I41
_ ~
ATTACHMENT A --PfJi--- - - -
I
' r.
G
I!
M ~
7,
l
1J
l I%
J
vI ~
~j
JI
`I
Z- m
~ki), _ i
lop
O ~ r
L
c N
5
I,
ti
i
I
I
i
Nn
i J
!C
c
~i
G
0
Z
F-'
G
1
cr-
O
Z
-l
ATTACHMENT B
_I
r7'
i
Li
it
l
1M
j
~r o
DFA Land
91 Gib
Power P 1 rec'e o°
v o
0
a a d a `dinR' Old hlai ' ooz.p cz
1 . y o v ~ i
S,e
Iauet~ Smith Collcg&`\ t 00 ° o
Pakaclise •~tNici,\
NORTHAMPTON
STATE HOSPITAL
C•~a..~••iri Mu•.••,...ru Di.,.,...( C.„ul Nl..n,n( .n~ 0~..•..••• 40° Ia0
_I\
r(, ATTACHMENT C
SCOPE OF RECORDATION
I. Written Documentation
A narrative summary shall be written for the overall District which
describes the architectural, historical, and cultural significance at the appropriate national,
state and/or local levels. The narrative overview should be followed by individual
summaries of the individual buildings. The National Register nomination form shall be
referenced and.utilized to the fullest extent possible.
II. Graphic Documentation
A series of 8 1/2" x 11" historic site plans, showing key periods in the
evolution of the District shall accompany the narrative summary. This should include the
current plan, showing the location of the District and each documented structure within it.
III. Photographic Documentation
A. Indices to photographs for the overall District and for each
individual building being documented.
B. Photo keys to show locations of overall views and those taken of
large, multi-faceted buildings.
C. Exterior views of each individually documented building:
1. General views of structure within setting.
2. Elevation views. More than one elevation may be
shown at a time.
3. Architectural details.
4. Engineering details.
D. Historic Views
A thorough search should be conducted, and photographic copies made of
a sample of historic photographs of the overall District and of each
individually documented building, if available. A source and approximate
date should be given for each original photograph.
E. Any original or other historic floor plans, photographically reduced
to 4" x 5", 5" x 7", or 8" x 10" format, of all individually documented
structures.
F. All photographs shall be black and white, archivally stable.
IV. Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS)
If any federal agency funding, license or permit is used for demolition or new
construction, the National Park Service, Mid-Atlantic Region, shall be contacted
regarding the scope of the HABS recordation.
-1
Ii1
F W
0
~ GBH SJey`~
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth
February 6, 1997 Massachusetts Historical Commission
Daniel P. Hughes
Office of Real Estate Management
Division of Capital Planning & Operations
100 Cambridge Street, Room 1611
Boston, MA 02202
RE:. Northampton State Hospital Redevelopment, Northampton, MA; MHC No. 3230
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the final draft of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the
proposed project referenced above. The Northampton State Hospital is listed in the State and National
Registers of Historic Places.
The Massachusetts Historical Commission is pleased that the RFP reflects the terms of the Memorandum
of Agreement between the-MHC DCPO, and the City of Northampton and encourages the marketing,
rehabilitation, and reuse of State Register properties The MHC looks forward to working with DCPO
and the City of Northampton in the sensitive and successful redevelopment of the former state hospital
campus. MHC staff anticipate additional consultation with DCPO regarding preparation of a draft
marketing plan for the campus.
These comments are provided to assist in compliance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 9, Sec.
26-27c, as amended by Chapter 254 of the Acts of 1988 (950 CMR 71.00).
If you have additional questions, please contact Allen Johnson of this office.
9
Sincerely,
e~th McDonough
Director
State Historic Preservation Officer
Massachusetts Historical Commission
cc: Northampton Historical Commission
Penelope Kim, Office of Planning & Development, City of Northampton
Wayne Feiden, Office of Planning & Development, City of Northampton
220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 • (617) 727-8470,
Fax: (617) 727-5128 TDD: 1-800-392-6090