02-019 PLANNING AND ZONING North Farms RdCity of Northampton, Massachusetts
Office of Planning and Development
City Hall • 210 Main Street
Northampton, MA 01060 • (413) 586.6950
FAX (413) 586 -3726
• Community and Economic Development
• Conservation • Historic Preservation
• Planning Board • Zoning Board of Appeals
• Northampton Parking Commission
DECISION OF
NORTHAMPTON PLANNING BOARD
APPLICANT: VIRGINIA M. SULLIVAN
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 52 WARD AVENUE, NORTHAMPTON
OWNER: LAWRENCE CORBETT
OWNER ADDRESS: 569 NORTH FARMS ROAD, FLORENCE
RE LAND OR BUILDINGS IN NORTHAMPTON AT: NORTH FARMS ROAD
At a meeting held on May 28, 1992, the Northampton Planning
Board of Appeals voted unanimously:
1. To APPROVE the request of Virginia M. Sullivan for a SPECIAL
PERMIT under the Provisions of §6 -13 of the Northampton Zoning
Ordinance for a flag lot.
2. To APPROVE the SPECIAL PERMIT under the provisions of $6.12 of
the Northampton Zoning Ordinance for a common driveway;
3. To APPROVE THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AND GRANT the REQUESTED
WAIVERS OF SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS with the condition that
there be no curb cuts allowed on Burts Pit Road.
Present and voting were Chairman Andrew Crystal, Diane Welter,
Nancy Duseau, Marion Mendelson, Bob Riddle, and Dan Yacuzzo.
The findings were as follows:
The Planning Board voted to approve the Special Permit for a flag
lot under §6.13 of the zoning ordinance as outlined in the
applicant's application for permit. The requested use of the
property as a flag lot is authorized by §6.13 of the Zoning
Ordinance at Page 6 -15 and the use of the flag lot as a single
family residence in an RR zone is shown in the Table of Use
Regulations. The requested use bears a positive relationship to
the public convenience or welfare because the use of the property
as a flag lot permits sensitive development of residential land
within the City without the necessity of a full -blown subdivision
1
.•
road. The requested use will not create undue traffic congestion
or unduly impair pedestrian safety because of the shared driveway.
The requested use will not overload any public water or sewer
systems because the residence will have its own water and will not
be dependent on city storm sewer or sewer systems. The requested
use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
ordinance and is consistent with the integrity and character of the
existing Rural- Residential zone.
The Planning Board voted to approve the Special Permit for a common
driveway under 56.12 of the Zoning Ordinance, Page 6 -14. The
common driveway shall service only two lots. The common driveway
shall provide the only vehicle access to the lot being serviced by
it and shall be so stated in the deed to the subject lot. The deed
from Corbett to Sullivan will state that the only access is across
the right -of -way as reserved to Corbett in the Hampshire County
Registry of Deeds, Book 2376, Page 2. The common driveway, as
shown on the site plan, shall have 12 -foot bituminous concrete
surface with four -foot, plus or minus, grass shoulders on each side
as required by the ordinance. The driveway is less than 300 feet
in length, and meets the approval of the DPW and the Fire
Department, and complies with all other driveway requirements.
The Planning Board also reviewed the criteria for site plan
approval under §10.11 and voted unanimously to approve the site
plan review with the requested waivers because there will be
minimum impact on pedestrian and vehicular traffic; provisions for
drainage and water problems have been addressed with the proposed
2' wide swale along the driveway to carry surface water away from
the site; there will be no adverse impact on the City's resources.
Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chap. 40A, 511, no variance,
finding, or special permit, or any extension, modification or
renewal thereof, shall take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the city Clerk that twenty days have
elapsed after the decision has been filed with the City Clerk and
that no appeal has been filed, or if such an appeal has been filed
that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Hampshire
county Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of
record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of
title. The fee for such recording or registering shall be paid by
the owner or applicant.
The Northampton Planning Board certifies that a variance, finding,
or special permit has been granted and that copies of this decision
and all plans referred to in it have been filed with the Planning
Board and the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 40A, section 15, notice is
hereby given that this decision is filed with the Northampton City
Clerk on the date below.
If you wish to appeal this action, your appeal must be filed
pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 40A, Section 17, with the Hampshire
Superior Court and notice of said appeal filed with the City Clerk
within twenty (20) days of the date this Decision was filed with
the City Clerk.
DECISION DATED: May 28, 1992
DECISION FILED WITH CITY CLERK: June 15, 1992
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SIGNATURES FOR APPROVAL:
Chairman: Andrew Crystal
�r
3
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
FLAG LOT SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1. PERMIT AUTHORITY(iES): ZBA_ Planning Board —x Council_
2. Applicant's Name: Virginia M. Sullivan
Address: 52 Ward Avenue, Northampton, M�Telephcne: 586 -9422
3. Property Owner: Lawrence Corbett
Address: 589 North Farms Road. Florence Telephone. 584 -5440
4. Status of Applicant:Owner Contract Purchaser x Lessee
Other (explain)
5. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # 2 Parcel 19 Zoning District: R -R
Street Address: North Farm., Rnad
6. Special Permit requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 6 .1, Pg 6 -15
7. Site Plan is forintermediate Pro)ect_or Major Project_ N/A
8. Narrative Description of the Proposed Project (Use additional sheets if
necessary): see attached Exhibit A
9. How does project comply with Special Permit criteria: (See Applicant's Guide for
criteria -use additional sheets is necessary)
see attached Exhibit A
I
10. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers, must be attached.
11. Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached.
12. 1 certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best
of my knowledge.
Date: Y /1 Applicant's Signature:
oi+ICt uat ONLY Date Filed: J Hie #: �dfv Nd)
(dell \pb:ssteplan.pb 3/6/92)
CITY OF NORTHAMPTON
COMMON DRIVEWAY
SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
1. PERMIT AUTHORIT'(IES): ZBA_ Planning Board x Council
2. Applicant's Name: Virzinia M. Sullivan
Address: 52 Ward Ave Northam Telephone: 586 -942°
3. Property Owner: Lawrence Corbett
Address: 589 North Farms Road, Florenc'lelephone: 584 -5440
4. Status of Applicant:Owner Contract Purchaser x Lessee
Other (explain)
5. Parcel Identification: Zoning Map # 2 Parcel 19 Zoning District: RR_R
Street Address: North Farms Rl,i
5. Special Permit requested under Zoning Ordinance Section 6. 12, Pg 6- 14
7. Site Plan is for: Intermediate Projector Major Project_ N/A
8. Narrative Description of the Proposed Project (Use additional sheets if
necessary): See attached Exhibit A
9. How does project comply with Special Permit criteria: (See Applicant's Guide for
criteria -use additional sheets is necessary)
See attached Exhibit A
10. Site Plan, with any requests for waivers, must be attached.
11. Certified Abutters List from Assessors' Office must be attached.
12. 1 certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate to the best
of my knowledge. 1
Date. N � k Applicant's Signature: 1G1/>!,- �✓1 h,��
urrici, Ust UNLt: Date Filed. // /f de is ¢BAPB)
(deWpb:srteplan pb 3/6/92)
Section 6.13 of Flaa Lot Arproval:
The requirements of a flag lot are set forth on Pages 6-15 and
6--16. The Planning Board may issue a Special Permit allowing a
flag lot in the R -R district when the lot is to be used solely for
a single family residential purpose. Th: lot here shown as parcel
1 -A on the plan attached hereto as Exhibit D will be used for a
single family residence. It is in ar R -R zone and meets the
following requirements for a flag lot:
A. Access frontaae of at least fiftv feet &9.rk feet are
provided.
B. Access width from front line to the orincipal structure of
at least fiftv feet. 1 0 feet are �?rovided.
C. An access roadwav with no curves having a radius of less
than 80 feet. The minimum curve radius shown is greater than 80
feet.
D. At least double the minimum lot area normallv required for
the district. The minimum lot area for a R -R zone is 40,000 square
feet, slightly under an acre. The proposed flag lot has an area of
6.612 acres provided.
E. All setbacks shall be equal to at least twice the setback
normally reauired for the district. In an R -R zone the front
setback is 40 feet. Therefore, 80 would be required here. The
front setback shown is in excess of 200 feet. In an R -R zone, the
side setback required is 20 feet. For a flag lot, 40 feet is
required. The building envelope as shown is 40 feet from the side
lot lines. The principal structure will be located within the
proposed building envelope. In an R -R zone, the rear setback is 50
feet. Therefore, 100 feet is required. The structure will be in
excess of 500 feet from the rear lot line.
F. The maximum building coverage allowed shall not exceed
two- thirds of that normallv provided in the district. The building
coverage is 10% (two- thirds of 150). The building coverage of the
proposed structure will be less than 1.5 -.
G. The minimum open space presented shall not be less than
85 %. The square footage of the lot is in excess of 288,000 (6.612
x 43560 = 288,018.72). 85s is 244,815. Subtracting the area of
open space from the total a_ea of the 1 - t leaves 43,i0x square feet
available for building and driveway coverage. It is estimated that
the driveway and building coverage will be less than 10,000 square
feet.
H. The lot shall be laid out such that the principal
structure may be located in such a manner that a circle with a
minimum diameter equal to one and one -half times the amount of the
minimum frontage required for a non flag lot in that district can
be nlaced around the urincinal structure without anv portion of
said circle falling outside of the vropertv's line. See the
attached plan which shows the above - mentioned circle as follows:
The frontage in a rural residential zone is 175 feet. One and one -
half times that is 262.5 feet. A circle with a diameter of 262.5
has a radius of 131.25. A circle with that radius is shown on the
plan. The proposed envelope is entirely within that circle.
I. Not Applicable. This is a single lot, not a contiguous
flat lot.
J. The grade length and location of the access drivewav shall
be of a suitable construction in the opinion of the Plannina Board._
Said drivewav shall conform to all applicable provisions of the
7onina ordinance. The existing and proposed driveway will conform
to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in that it consists of an
existing twelve -foot wide bituminous concrete drive with a four -
foot plus or minus grass shoulder on each side There is a maximum
grade cf 13 %. The driveway is less than 300 feet long and the
f_rst proposed passing turn is shown at the entrance drive as 20 by
25 feet as required for shared driveways. The Sullivan residence
will provide turnaround space appropriate to residential Parking.
K. The plans submitted to the Planning Board under this
s- shall be the same as the plans submitted to the Planninq
Board on the subdivision control law and shall include the
statement: "Lot _ is a flag lot; building is permitted only in
accordance with the special flag lot provisions of the Northampton
Zonina ordinance." The plan attached hereto is for recording in
the Hampshire County Registry of Deeds and meets all requirements
therefor and bears upon it the note "Lot 1 -A is a flag lot.
Building is permitted only in accordance with the special flag lot
provisions of the Northampton Zoning Ordinance."
L. The following additional information shall also be
submitted with the Special Permit application:
1. A plan showing .
a) the location and lavout of the proposed drivewav and
house. The layout of the proposed driveway and building
envelope are shown on the plan.
b) All provisions for drainage and storm water runoff
drainage or sewer system or any other municipal system to such an
extent that a hazard affectinu health, safety and the General
welfare in the immediate or in any other area of the City will he
created The residence will have its own water and will not be
dependent on city storm sewer or sewer systems.
E. Not applicable.
F. The requested use must not unduly impair the integrity or
character of the district or adioinina zones nor be detrimental to
the health. morals or General welfare. The use shall be in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. The
residential development of back lot land in this portion of
Northampton is consistent with current practice. There are
numerous houses built well back from the street in this part of the
City. This use of the property is consistent with the integrity
and character of the existing Rural - Residential zone. It will not
interfere with the health, morals or general welfare. The
applicant requests that this special permit for a flag lot be
granted.
Section 6.12 - Vehicular Aaress /Access to a Lot and Common Drivewav
The requirements for a shared driveway are set forth in the
Northampton Zoning ordinance at section 6.12 at Page 6 -14. The
only access to Parcel 1 -A as shown on the plan will be over the
side lot line as permitted by an existing right -of -way across the
land of Patrick and Rebecca Lang, Hampshire County Registry of
Deeds Book 2376, Page 2. The requirements set forth in the Zoning
ordinance are met by the existing driveway and proposed driveway.
A. Said common drivewav shall not service more than three
lots The driveway serves two lots onlv.
B. The common drivewav shall provide the onlv vehicular
access to the lot beina serviced by it and shall be so stated in
the deed to the subiect lot. The deed from Corbett to Sullivan
will state that the only access is across the right -of -way as
reserved to Corbett in the Hampshire County Registry of Deeds Book
2376, Page 2.
C. The Grade length and location of the common drivewav
shall be of suitable construction for the access and turnaround of
the number of tvpes of vehicles including moving vans, ambulances,
fire and police which will be utilizing such driveway. Such common
drivewav'
1. shall have a width of at least fifteen feet 15 feet is
provided and is shown on the plan as a 12 -foot bituminous
concrete surface with four -foot plus or minus grass shoulders
one each side.
2. passing turnouts providing a total width of at least 20
feet along a distance of at least 25 feet spaced with no more
than 300 feet between turnouts and with the first such passing
turnout being located at the drivewav connection to the
street The shared driveway is less than 300 feet in length.
The first turnout is shown at the entrance to the driveway.
3. The drivewav must meet the prior approval of the DPW and
the Fire Departments. These approvals have been granted.
4. Shall conform to all of the drivewav requirements of the
7onina Ordinance. The existing and shared driveway comply
with all other driveway requirements.
Snecial Permit Criteria AnDlied to Common Driveway.
A. The shared drivewav use is set forth in Section 6.12 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
B. The requested use bears a Positive relationship to the
nubl is convenience and welfare in that it permits the sharing of an
existing driveway rather than requiring the construction of a
parallel drive and an additional curbcut on the street.
C. The reauested use must not create undue traffic conaestioq
or undulv impair Pedestrian safety. As explained in connection
with the flag lot special permit, the number of trips will not
create any noticeable change in the traffic on North Farms Road or
impair any pedestrian safety.
D. The construction of the drivewav will not have an- impact
on anv Public water drainage or sewer system.
E. There are no special regulations applicable here.
F_ The reauested use is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance,
the character and integrity of the Rural - Residential area in this
part of Northampton in which there are numerous houses located away
from the street at the end of driveways of the same or similar
length as that proposed here. Consequently, the use is in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance.
Wherefore, the applicant requests the Planning Board to allow
the shared driveway as proposed and shown on said plan consistent
with the Shared Driveway Agreement attached hereto which shall be
duly recorded in the Hampshire County Registry of Deeds upon
conveyance of the flag lot from Corbett to Sullivan.
Section 10.11 - Site Plan ADnroval /Special Permit Process
The applicant's flag lot and shared driveway project requires
• site plan review /approval because it is a project which requires
• special permit (Zoning Ordinance 10.11(2), Page 10 -6).
Site Plan /Waivers Reauested_:
The requirements of a site plan are shown on pages 10 -9 and
10 -10 of the local Zoning Ordinance. With respect to each of the
criteria, the applicant states that it has met the criteria stated
or requests a waiver as follows:
B. The scale of one inch to 40 feet. The applicant requests
a waiver and submits a plan at one inch to 100 feet. The applicant
states that the plan is to the scale necessary for the filing of
the plan in the Registry of Deeds as required by the Zoning
Ordinance. A one in forty scale would require two sheets and not
be consistent with Registry regulations.
1. The name and address of the owners and the developer and
date and scale of the plans are shown on the plans. The
project has no name.
2. Location and boundaries of the lot: The adjacent streets
and ways and the location and owners' names of all adjacent
properties on the North side of Mountain Farms Road within 300
feet are shown. There are no zoning district boundaries in
this area. The owners of the property across the street
within 300 feet are not shown and the applicant requests a
waiver from this requirement.
3. Mr. Corbett's existing building is shown. The location of
the proposed building is not known. It will be within the
proposed building envelope. The setbacks are shown as a
dotted line. They determine the proposed building envelope.
The applicant requests a waiver of the remainder of this
requirement in that the proposed building is neither designed
nor located upon the property and such information would not
!- required for a single family residence.
4. The land will be used for a single family residence.
5. The applicant requests a waiver from the two -foot
topography requirement.
6. The location of parking and loading areas, public and
private ways, driveways, walkways, access and egress points,
including proposed surfacing, are shown on the proposed plan
to the extent they are necessary for the approval of a flag
lot.
7. The existing structures are shown on the plan.
8. The applicant requests a waiver from this requirement in
that it would not be required for a single family residence.
9. There will be no proposed signs other than those required
to direct users of the shared driveway to the appropriate
residences.
10. Not applicable.
11. Not applicable.
WHEREFORE, the applicant requests that the Planning Board
accept the site plan as presented.
6. Review /Annroval Criteria
A. The flag lot for the proposed single family residence is
a wooded lot. The flag lot ordinance requires buffers of twice the
dimensions normally required in the zone. These buffers will be
woods in its natural state enhanced by coniferous plantings.
B. The vehicular - d pedestrian movement within the site will
be consistent with its use as a single family residence.
C. Parking and loading spaces will be consistent with the
single family residence. The single family residence will be built
within the building envelope. The plan is for the residence to be
relatively low in height and responsive to the open space and
topography characteristic of the lot.
D. See C above.
E. The residence will have its own well and its own sanitary
sewer system.
F. The performance standards are not applicable to a single
family residence.
For the above reasons, the applicant requests that site plan
approval and the special permit be granted for the flag lot, shared
driveway project as presented.
The applicant is a contract purchaser of Mr. Corbett's
proposed flag lot. The applicant is responsible for securing
necessary approvals for use of the lot as a single family
residence. The proposed flag lot will have access over abutter's
property and therefore requires shared driveway approval.
The applicant's sketch plans show the proposed flag lot plan:
Exhibit 1. The applicant's building envelope on Exhibit 2 is based
upon the applicant's view of the lot tnat on Exhibit 1 line "A" is
the front line, line "B" the rear lot line and line "C" a portion
of the side lot line for setback purposes.
Applicant's Exhibit 2 shows the existing driveway servicing
the residence of Dr. Lang and subject to Lawrence Corbett's right
of way. The maximum grade is 131. Grade at the intersection with
North Farms Road is considerably less. Exhibit 2 shows the
building envelope as setback from side lot lines 40 Front and
rear setbacks are in excess of minimums (front 80 rear 100').
Location of applicant's residence will be entirely within the
building envelope.
Applicant's leach field will be located on property of
Lawrence Corbett per sanitary easement to be drafted. See Exhibit
1.
Applicant believes this zoning permit should be rejected as
two special permits are required:
1) flag lot special permit; and
2) shared driveway special permit.
_Oc /' - /7
B,[WR SST/J J C'oN9uv
BK /4Lt - 'G4JT
W /CClFN59URG
M7i'ThANP70A/
P4TRrCK H GaGGJNd t
0.`!HZ`NGCrryLUS
SfE eK 20U- aBC
PCOUBK )OJ -PG;p
1
1
NORTH QRM R4/0
3/ shaRL EK k' OER03F/
4 C
i 1
SEE 3K r wROSE
p
mC
_ au«,f
h �
y .m_ J
Pgr
45/0 4CRES
`' o
b
/J3'S,.
l9t
jr4
/45b- P6l
.is
%'
4
h
/R1
n
/
,m N, - ) �
a Sf5-
39 -tSW
4),*
33'' -03 4, "W
:F.O'
J
r
rusts am x[cunsr -ws
� � �SGL'- 30'
....
-OJ'N
7477C
rn.....fev. a wnnrusErn
wv
\
p >e b TE 2.14 63
}. , j
_ se ,•,, 1 I \
Hayd
Z ,
enville I - /- -r
•
l
r
\
l
Q CHA % - L ES IV DEfOE�
u L A k DEE05 E
EL ••`- •' ; o ; ►�{ _ i , ' (, r �� 1 .
j� � ...,� o • . • k �i t� . ill '- I , : 1
\ SEE" BK 157 P 155 1� _ .fir .11 '� ,; ► -
- - •' � - �, � •} � ' : ` � � . , � .,�,� ; � l 111 _
B� /6-2/ R Z3
+ ' L OV5
a x V V& L I Z . 57 I V I/ 1 L % V 7 r 0 ' 4,5 !/ I �I `\ i ` V " • / P ZCD 4 . CO `f' k1ofTNA &PTDA J 7t �Q
� St M � ( � �—�.�- Sri• I;�' i. % i %! ; n ��
%rim
n� AZAIc TIC , : - L � ►�► ��� !��' 1 ' `� r'• j ` A
% I . ,. ; • ;r
!rk - - � � � • �� :• -,: • : . �'•� ; //)) l ��l_ ,` , 1 � : % �_ {111 -
IN � � � , �• ., ' , .� \ � � \ -- 777 ;irr ` •-`_ - -- ` -.�: .:v
J LAEe
ESEC LQV& DvOND e X
=SCE ' e 2376 - 9 Z � � F -� PLAN Scale 1,2 5 000
. �, _ 1?��L��AH B. �/�._SE LOCUS ��-
.
5U, TO f/&//
y _ ' � w • � • ' ip� • / / � A ACA - ) � i� - :4., _ +• •. r F
p f � ., CO /� ¢ eTEOCT .SBA
Aci` E/V C, E E t, OL / T �H/L C EL I B��'X
. _ ; - . -.. . • �� - �� *&W D. CO�BETTD�E� A �•- ��`
\� ,eEsE,evED Fae ,eE$�. ,rr& zY, m,r
f < _ Ass . }; la P. SET
c — ,{' .-
�= .. -- l k5 FLAG LOT 8C1�l.�JG IS'��'1TT���
O . / •
.} Ili
\ -
_ t•1 f •
F !
S
1
■
a •.
,
y
-
_ a - . . -: - -
P FAG
_4 f . '• ��1 Al A� DLD4.IX E ' 17
/I Ty
F
}
A O �•
' =
3 `f 4 °
- f
r r i
1
]] r
Q F
s
sir' •� Y . �..: Y
ti - •, '$j' - '
OLCSE 1N -
m LL 8E � {.
F _
_ � ZD,�1
- 1111// r H�
]]]] I�'
R
1 O �
Z r
k
- r a
�UIL
_ T ly "
f
f -
- > a �- + 'J�f r•. . - ,t,., `* br' . _�"�S �_a.. �. � - - : - a..,. ..6 _ _ >` a _ _ _ �.a.._...., �.g -- _ -'rs ?--^- +:c:
er ♦ Y - ...- .yam•.' - a off sz ,�° '4- •tea .a - . - : =- -. 6 _
,.a._ ?'- ,.,,.• �/ 4 !
i - t
ENVELOPE ° \.�•.L �aV �
a a P, .Do sED DomEWAr DB4 /A�Am ffr jLIRFAeE jHEEr F�d W.
SAP 1 9 o �,�,alAr/A�E BYj v meE .3YEEr FL6 r .
E�' /wST/IVv DElYE1�i%
/ X EX1%5;rbV46 849 _ql S 1v moeTN FAZVS LOAD. r .
A!�'�"EAGE!�EADE .4Lf>� �G �X/g T V DRIVE FEW /UDf r
j °�`+ Q \ • �, ROAD TO /ail TE,eSEC T /4!l/ t%v'/ T/-/ PZ0PZ1SED Del YE = I.
4 t, «t �, 3 I O _ X 87 / - .5"""E , I p = ' _ ` . lilili � A ��iE'AGE L ADE P�' pojED D,el vE _ / -e % :t
F` a! I.P SET •38Ls . 58' i \9 - s -
c� � h 9 iOWNEZ OF LDT I A L� /-B: OWAIEZ OF .Si.�IA� Pft-- )W
' - V
- \ a LAWeEAAfE e,0 T PATE /C1C J. G REBECIA MAO
MgrI4 FAEMS EGAD NOETN FAEP S E04D
' i , •'-70 " ..,�.��� - - GL/ WE r14AVPTDA1, AM ND,eryAMPTOA/, MA
- r _ ' .•- : . • - - ` � �, �, i - - .. - D 4 784 ' - - " . � :
PnvEer DEv/ELDPFe • DEED
l.P. ET q A /U,�l Lo /(v I B�'. 4.5�� . ;Sly • J V�i� �i�!/ �� . �.S1lL L ,8� /.�2 S �G. k Jr' r
X /�'TTrG� 5f WARD AkEAIZ,�. ,BBC. 1165 PG. 3;!K4V&5 7
t �ATCy
4 110
\ � joeTAAA4PTD 1 AV PL. B. 124 f6. B3 a
•- � TlJ�if/Ol1T � � _ n _
s .
�D D ZD 40 em BO /DD /ZO :rs
DtnfLLlL THIS PLAN AND
Am o5 3 o � loll
` SURVEY CONFORMS TO THE TECHNICAL PLA�1 c � LAAU fiE WORK* ---
\(/ • A COMPUTATIONS uI. T. i
+1_ = , :• _ Q 1 - k AND PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR i =
N �. > / 1 &PTHp1yDT0k1, F�55XX15CTT,5!
A176 TH€ PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING -3� -5� � � y � � � �k�� `� _ . ,�. Q ll,,,,
43 ��.�� 4I -: IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PAC EPP D FDE D W . T
_ CHf CKEI�= Y
_ "' p M MASSACHUSETTS .--.'{
- f jt/44 58 IT UI \ 4 7 497 c�111 L •"
THIS HAS BEEN
6 6.6 V / is U i Id ! _f"! M.
T 3�r Q °� :. OATS: APE /L x,1992
PREPARED IN CO WITH THE
J:
•. _ NM
ecu 4 7 7G
FH' 7 f E04D k lOk lQ� /' l/ /S RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ,
' f• �' ALMER HUNTLEY, JR. a ASSOC IATES, INC.�`
f • ^ • - ` RE .
�kl /995 1, WV1WL �IT�D yf�/ I�S � � ISTERS OF DEEDS OF THE
t �, +. SU RVEYORS ENGINEERS - PLANERS Dpi T 1flG�/l/Ay P LAID OG T 50 90 Gt1.l E 1 4 _ a T COMWNWEALT OF MASSA CHUSETTS. . �
•` 30 IJU Dl5TP -14L DelY EA-IT
in
- .'. r' , , ' • • ` 5EE & 59. • / 26 / / A 76 E I / ! DAl Al 60ZA I . �'. _ - G.12 lc° - a • _ ii
- ; s . ., NORTHAMPTON, MASS.
6 W& 1,55 A1fJEf%5 54 Z7 /Cs .3 SIGNED :' ` '�'� •� a _,'>
1& -032- 91 / . I
T SHEET. ( ,;
- - Z �'� - ` - - 2~ i i, - •±' r -�.` yc - -�` ,e ' -f '�i_. ti:p - ,a - • •i - DAA \E�
:. ,t _ .p a '♦ a :. � a - • • i - -�_ � - y ,�
- • r 1 - • • .+i.;� _ .f. ,. _ - �''fr - -. r .. F a , � - •�, , }' r - i` •t s i • � K - �•F - . �i t • �_ } _ _ • _ _ _ _ _ —_ _ — ' \-n ° �_.
y ii i o f `i i u i iyil u i i i u u i u i iiliii a � i i '111 i i )Nit i iu i i ii mil I i i ii i i i i i`i i t t • . s _f i �. - Cdj9
70 4/
•r:. r. f •'i .. �•' `s_ z. ''t s '.,; - - � • Y. F - .s _ „rte_ DIgfUzed
t
t - S
i
Y ,}• _
t •.
/ Y Y
b
r. s
TT _ it - 4 s . .
l - y{
', .
T
r f
_ - a
s
.� k
-• \
•• •_{ -_. •+ • � a° ` - -
W7. -
-�.. 1 f Y >�
ty x
yy - tee• - -.: . --
• x' - - i�• _ _. w , > ,e' = i+• � -- . fir.- r
wiG _ .. - ■ i.. - - - ; >71ii` - - • "'i �� h�w� < r `�£s� .. Y �;�' - s. �5.� _ n v: ,. t s , - _ ;�
- r ` ' >' �_ `. - Tr .. � ..wm, ++t'4 isfi __ y -�S• . ... �•�-' s�' - > -' w Rs$i- >s '°." �`' .
C,fo% P atiOcAmo
02 o il
oLX old.
DECISION OF NORTHAMPTON CITY COUNT
At a meeting held on August 21, 1986, the City Council of the
City of Northampton voted unanimously to grant the Special Permit
request of Lawrence E. Corbett and Rita D. Corbett, 569 North
Farms Road, Northampton, for the purpose of creating a Flag Lot
under the provisions of Section 6.13 Flag Lots of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Northampton, for their property at 569
North Farms Road. Public Hearing for this application was held
on August 21, 1966.
Based upon evidence presented to the City Council at said
Public Hearing and after due deliberation, the City Council issues
the following findings:
a. The use requested is listed in the Table of Use
Regulations as a special permit in the district for which
application is made or is so designated elsewhere in this
Ordinance.
b. The requested use bears a positive relationship to the
public convenience or welfare.
C. The requested use will not create undue traffic conges-
tion or unduly impair pedestrian safety.
d. The requested use will not overload any public water,
drainage or sewer system or any other municipal system
to such an extent that the requested use or any developed
use in the immediate area or in any other area of the
City will be unduly subjected to hazards affecting health,
safety, or the general welfare.
e. Does not apply.
f. The requested use will not unduly impair the integrity
or character of the district or adjoining zones, nor be
detrimental to the health, morals, or general welfare.
The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and
intent of the Ordinance.
Do Not Wnteln These Spaces
Application Number,
Uq�
Recd B I
Checked Filed Fee Pd.
a. �i i�
Recd. ZBA
i
Maps)
Parcel(s)
A P PL I CATI O N_IS HEREBY MADE TO THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON d10M KZ'CX X
1 Name of Applicant
Lawrence E. Corbett & Rita D. Corbett CITY COUNCIL
Address fiRd North Farmc Rnad. Northamnton Ma ss. 01060 (Florence)
2 Owner of Property Same
Address Same
3 Applicant is )!Owner, : Contract Purchaser, ❑Lessee, LTenant in Possession
4 Apphcation is made for
VARIANCE from the provisions of Section page of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Northampton
XSPECIAL PERMIT under the provisions of Section 6.13 page 6 -11 of the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Northampton
OTHER
5 Location of Propertv 589 North Farms Road, Northampton being situated on
the Nn rth side of SR9 N n Farms Rnid street; and shown on the Assessors' Maps,
Sheet Nn ? , Parcel(s) to
6 Zone RR
7 Description of proposed work and/or use, Flag Lot:
Annliragts devrA to create a Flao Lot. with an area of 5.69 Acres with Seventy Feet
70' o f frnntmr nn whi to con vtruct a stnole family dwellino for our dau ghter.
8.(a) Sketch plan attached, El Yes ❑ No
(bl Site plan: L�Attched El Not Required r
9- Set forth reasons upon which application is based -
ADnitCants desire to build a single family dwellino for their daughter on said
5.690 acre oarcel, in order to have her closeby, since she has and a physical dtsabilit}
throughout her life.
10 Abutters (see instructions; list on reverse side of form)
12. 1 hereby certify that information contained herein is true to the best of my knowledge.
L.AWW NCE E. CO�RtB�E/TTp &�RITA D. CORBETT
Date n at 6 igRfi A pplicant's Signature ni�.�ncsr,.c. L(1n/rL"'
Da N - try - These Spaces Application Number. (
Recd B I II' Checked Filed Fee Pd Recd ZBA Map(s) Parcel Is)
IB, l og, 'J�t B, oa:e IDaI= I Ari o{ " `,. ,}la' lo.,ie
AR Al MADE TO THE CITY OF NORTHAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
4;Hr
�Y' Name of Applicant Lawrence E. Corbett and Rita D. Corbett
Addre,, 589 North Farms Road, Northampton, MA 01060 (Florence)
2 Owner of Property Same
Address
3. Applicant is X I Owner, Contract Purchaser, 1 !Lessee: I (Tenant In Possession
4 Application is made for iip 1
X VARIANCE from the provisiofiP f�ec1 POn VI 6.8 2 page 666/ of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Northampton (pertaining to one building per lot)
and /or (X] Variance from the provisions of Article VI, Section 6.2, Page 6 -2 of the
Zoning Ordiance of the City of Northampton. (pertaining to frontage).
iSPECIAL PERMIT under the provisions of Section page of the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Northampton
OTHER
5 Location of Propertv Near 589 North Farm; Road being situated on
the Easterly side of North Farms Road street, and shown on the Assessors' Maps,
Sheet No ti Parcel(sr /rf - uircrt !
6 Zone
7 Description of proposed work and/or use
Applicants desire to build a si ngle family home for their dauahtar no a 9.575 arre
parcel of real estate (with accessory ri ht of wav) whirh al raady has an existing sing
family home and frontage of 247.09- said fr ontage having been d erroasod by
the relocation of North Farms Road . Ili visinn of th,s let remits in a F And arra naree)
for this new home as ;hnwn on the survey fi lad horeuiith
8. (a) Sketch plan attached, x: Yes I - :No
(Survey - Iluntley)
(b) Site plan. t lAttched X, Not Required
9 Set f rth reasons upon which application is based
Rpol icarts desire to build a sing family home for their dauahtar on said 8. 9
acre parcel, in order to have her clici since sha ha; had a nhvsical d „ah,lir
throughout her life.
10 Abutters (see instructions, list on reverse side of form)
12 1 hereby certify that information contained herein is true to the best of my knowledge
LAWRENCE E._COR$VTy.and RITA DZUETT
Da'� October 70, 1984 Applicant's Signature (' ✓ -- -ti%� —�
6Y: Leonard C. Jekanowski, Esq.
Their Attorney
01000
• FORM A
N R O 1 ►S•'.
//- ,4
Date
APPLICATION FOR ENDOR..EMENT i
OF PLAN BELI EVED Iii off' TO RE QU 1 RE APPROVAL
File one completed form with the Planning Board
and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with
with requirements of Section 3, 02,
4
�o the Planning Board:
The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of
his property in the City of Northampton does not consti.�tuLe
division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law,
herewith subm1 is sa:.d plan 'for a determination and endorsement
t.l Board approval under the - Subdivision Control Law
is not required.
1
Ap
1
(&&WZem
Print or type a Signature
dd re3a 0
2. owner ��C A99 E , i
Pr nt or type Si nature � "I U� c�
ee
3 . Surveyor ,
Pri nt or type name Signature
Address
4. Deed or prop ert y recorded i Registr
Book Page 3 5 . Location and Description of Property:
scanned
digitized
checked
d a y e
//
Date of Sul
City Clerk
11
FORM A
NORTHAMPTON, MA
APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT
OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL
File five completed forms and plans and one mylar with the City clerk and the
Planning Board in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.02.
To the Planning Board:
The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his/her property
in the City of Northampton does not constitute division within the mean, ng of the
Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and
endorsement that Planning Board anoroval under the Subdivision Control Law is not
required. _
1. Applicant Virginia M. m an
sae I
Print cz type name Signacu;le
52 Ward Avenues. Nnrr1,, -1 n_ MA 01060 986-901
Address Phone
r r
,.. owner Lawrence Corbett
Print or type name Signature
589 North Farms Rd., Northampton, MA 010 /0 584 -5440
Address I+ J \n Ph�p* /�
3. Sur,ey.� Almer Hunt lev, Jr. d Assoc. Print or or type name signature
30 Industrial Drive East, Northampton, PIA 584 -7444
Address 01060 Phone
4. Deed or property recorded in Hampshire 'Registry,
Book 1527 Page 616 -
S. Location and Description of Property:
6. Assessor's Map ID: Lot(.): 19
Date Submitted for Planning Date P ni Board
Board Approval: Debt
ionFid: S ePteMb,r 11, 199
City Clerk: City 1err:�"1T11- I pi P—/ ` `
(signature) (Signature)
(4111191)